Environmental Justice Areas with 2040 Roads

Similar documents
ADDRESSING TITLE VI AND ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE IN LONG-RANGE TRANSPORTATION PLANS

Regional Performance Measures

Environmental Analysis, Chapter 4 Consequences, and Mitigation

Regional Performance Measures

APPENDIX C-3 Equitable Target Areas (ETA) Technical Analysis Methodology

GIS Analysis of Crenshaw/LAX Line

Appendixx C Travel Demand Model Development and Forecasting Lubbock Outer Route Study June 2014

Urbanization factors in the Gilleland Creek watershed, Travis County, Texas. Michael Kanarek GEO386G Final Project Dec. 2, 2011

Environmental Justice Analysis

FHWA Peer Exchange Meeting on Transportation Systems Management during Inclement Weather

Expanding the GSATS Model Area into

The Role of Transitways in Our Region s Economic Competitiveness. The 23rd CTS Annual Research Conference St. Paul, MN May 23, 2012

GIS Models for Analyzing Intercity Commute Patterns: A Case Study of the Austin-San Antonio Corridor in Texas

Technical Memorandum #2 Future Conditions

Extreme Weather and Climate Change Vulnerability Assessment of Central Texas Transportation Infrastructure

Evaluating access to jobs via transit from disparate neighborhoods

2015 Grand Forks East Grand Forks TDM

BROOKINGS May

Updating the Urban Boundary and Functional Classification of New Jersey Roadways using 2010 Census data

Prepared for: San Diego Association Of Governments 401 B Street, Suite 800 San Diego, California 92101

Applying Health Outcome Data to Improve Health Equity

Tier 2 Final Environmental Assessment I-66 Transportation Technical Report. Appendix E. Travel Demand Forecasting Model Validation Memorandum

Network Equilibrium Models: Varied and Ambitious

Environmental Justice Analysis FOR THE MINNESOTA STATEWIDE FREIGHT SYSTEM PLAN

3.0 ANALYSIS OF FUTURE TRANSPORTATION NEEDS

CRP 608 Winter 10 Class presentation February 04, Senior Research Associate Kirwan Institute for the Study of Race and Ethnicity

Spatiotemporal Analysis of Commuting Patterns: Using ArcGIS and Big Data

Mapping Accessibility Over Time

Spatiotemporal Analysis of Commuting Patterns in Southern California Using ACS PUMS, CTPP and LODES

StanCOG Transportation Model Program. General Summary

FHWA Planning Data Resources: Census Data Planning Products (CTPP) HEPGIS Interactive Mapping Portal

Analyzing the Market Share of Commuter Rail Stations using LEHD Data

ITEM 11 Information June 20, Visualize 2045: Update to the Equity Emphasis Areas. None

Sensitivity of estimates of travel distance and travel time to street network data quality

Geospatial Analysis of Job-Housing Mismatch Using ArcGIS and Python

Identifying Megaregions in the US: Implications for Infrastructure Investment

HORIZON 2030: Land Use & Transportation November 2005

Developing the Transit Demand Index (TDI) Gregory Newmark, Regional Transportation Authority Transport Chicago Presentation July 25, 2012

III. FORECASTED GROWTH

APPENDIX V VALLEYWIDE REPORT

Spatial and Socioeconomic Analysis of Commuting Patterns in Southern California Using LODES, CTPP, and ACS PUMS

Frequently Asked Questions

Typical information required from the data collection can be grouped into four categories, enumerated as below.

Alternatives Analysis

Spatial Organization of Data and Data Extraction from Maptitude

2040 MTP and CTP Socioeconomic Data

Figure 8.2a Variation of suburban character, transit access and pedestrian accessibility by TAZ label in the study area

VHD Daily Totals. Population 14.5% change. VMT Daily Totals Suffolk 24-hour VMT. 49.3% change. 14.4% change VMT

VALIDATING THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN URBAN FORM AND TRAVEL BEHAVIOR WITH VEHICLE MILES TRAVELLED. A Thesis RAJANESH KAKUMANI

APPENDIX IV MODELLING

H. R heading to fund the award and oversight by the Administrator of grants made under this heading. FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION

GIS Data and Technology to Support Transportation & MPO Decision-Making & Planning. using an Eco-Logical* Approach within the Kansas City Region

Data Collection. Lecture Notes in Transportation Systems Engineering. Prof. Tom V. Mathew. 1 Overview 1

An Integrated Approach to Statewide Travel Modeling Applications in Delaware

Local Economic Activity Around Rapid Transit Stations

Table of Contents. Executive Summary... ES Introduction Transportation Data

presents challenges related to utility infrastructure planning. Many of these challenges

TRAVEL DEMAND MODEL. Chapter 6

Alternatives Analysis Report

DIFFERENT INFLUENCES OF SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS ON THE HUNTING AND FISHING LICENSE SALES IN COOK COUNTY, IL

Section 12. Winter Storms

A More Comprehensive Vulnerability Assessment: Flood Damage in Virginia Beach

Developing Built Environment Indicators for Urban Oregon. Dan Rubado, MPH EPHT Epidemiologist Oregon Public Health Division

Can Public Transport Infrastructure Relieve Spatial Mismatch?

GIS ANALYSIS METHODOLOGY

Advancing Urban Models in the 21 st Century. Jeff Tayman Lecturer, Dept. of Economics University of California, San Diego

Com munity Advisor y C ommitte e Meeting

WOODRUFF ROAD CORRIDOR ORIGIN-DESTINATION ANALYSIS

Using GIS to Determine Goodness of Fit for Functional Classification. Eric Foster NWMSU MoDOT

Study Overview. the nassau hub study. The Nassau Hub

Rural Alabama. Jennifer Zanoni. Geography Division U.S. Census Bureau. Alabama State Data Center 2018 Data Conference Tuscaloosa, Alabama

Forecasts from the Strategy Planning Model

Regional Snapshot Series: Transportation and Transit. Commuting and Places of Work in the Fraser Valley Regional District

Table 3-1 Gallatin County Population and Employment Trends ( )

MINNESOTA SIDE Draft TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM

Forecasts for the Reston/Dulles Rail Corridor and Route 28 Corridor 2010 to 2050

Appendix B. Durham Region Travel Demand Model Calibration

STAR COMMUNITY RATING SYSTEM OBJECTIVE EE-4: EQUITABLE SERVICES & ACCESS COMMUNITY LEVEL OUTCOMES FOR KING COUNTY, WA

About places and/or important events Landmarks Maps How the land is, hills or flat or mountain range Connected to maps World Different countries

Regional Transit Development Plan Strategic Corridors Analysis. Employment Access and Commuting Patterns Analysis. (Draft)

Spatial Disparities in the Distribution of Parks and Green Spaces in the United States

Rural Pennsylvania: Where Is It Anyway? A Compendium of the Definitions of Rural and Rationale for Their Use

Service Area Analysis of Portland's METRO Bus System. Andy Smith-Petersen, University of Southern Maine -

final report A Recommended Approach to Delineating Traffic Analysis Zones in Florida Florida Department of Transportation Systems Planning Office

High Speed / Commuter Rail Suitability Analysis For Central And Southern Arizona

Three Ways the CSU is Using Geographic Information Systems (GIS) to Inform Decisions

Background of Project

Speakers: Jeff Price, Federal Transit Administration Linda Young, Center for Neighborhood Technology Sofia Becker, Center for Neighborhood Technology

NORTH HOUSTON HIGHWAY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT (NHHIP)

Traffic Impact Study

EAGLE FORD Regional Field Study

Refinement of the OECD regional typology: Economic Performance of Remote Rural Regions

The Emerging Southeast MegaRegion

East Bay BRT. Planning for Bus Rapid Transit

Tracey Farrigan Research Geographer USDA-Economic Research Service

Market Street PDP. Nassau County, Florida. Transportation Impact Analysis. VHB/Vanasse Hangen Brustlin, Inc. Nassau County Growth Management

Geography and Usability of the American Community Survey. Seth Spielman Assistant Professor of Geography University of Colorado

Uses of Travel Demand Models Beyond the MTP. Janie Temple Transportation Planning and Programming Division

A Simplified Travel Demand Modeling Framework: in the Context of a Developing Country City

Economic and Social Urban Indicators: A Spatial Decision Support System for Chicago Area Transportation Planning

Transcription:

CAPITAL AREA METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION CAMPO Region Date: 2/23/15 Environmental Justice Areas with 40 Roads Map : EJ Areas with 40 Road Types BRNET I BELL 138 WILLIAMSON 1 MILAM LLANO 9 281 TRAIS A 2243 79 973 2222 6 LEE 1 360 2244 111 ress Cong BLANCO 2304 967 12 21 150 01 HAYS 32 BASTROP 304 142 123 86 FAYETTE CALDWELL GADALPE 0 BEXAR 2.5 5 15 90 Mi This map was developed by CAMPO for the purpose of aiding in regional transportation planning decisions and is not wranted for any other use. CAMPO makes no guantee regding its accuracy or completeness. If you would like to receive the GIS layers found on this map send your request to: campo@campotexas.org. Data Source: Census Bureau Author: GSG Document Path: H:\Maps\40 Plan Maps\Public Review Maps\Environmental Justice Areas with Roads.mxd 82 COMAL 4 EJ Area GONZALES Non-EJ Area Road Type Interstate Freeway/Expressway Tolled Principal Arterial 150 CAMPO 40 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN Minor Arterial Collector Local Ramp/Frontage /Direct Connector

CAMPO Region Date: 9//15 40 Transit with Environmental Justice Map 36: EJ Areas with 40 Transit I BELL 138 BRNET 1 MILAM LLANO 9 WILLIAMSON 281 2243 A 79 973 2222 6 2244 BLANCO 111 Cong ress 1 360 LEE TRAIS 2304 967 12 01 32 304 142 123 86 CALDWELL FAYETTE GADALPE 15 90 Mi This map was developed by CAMPO for the purpose of aiding in regional transportation planning decisions and is not wranted for any other use. CAMPO makes no guantee regding its accuracy or completeness. If you would like to receive the GIS layers found on this map send your request to: campo@campotexas.org. Data Source: CAMPO, CapMetro, Census Author: GSG Document Path: H:\Maps\40 Plan Maps\Revised Plan Maps\Transit Projects 40 with EJ_092815.mxd 82 0BEXAR 2.5 5 150 HAYS COMAL BASTROP 21 4 GONZALES Commuter Rail Transit Center/ Pk and Ride Facility Future Concept Environmental Justice Area Intercity Rail Express Bus Rapid Bus Planning 151

CAPITAL AREA METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION Have at least 25 percent of the population ening an income below the national poverty thresholds for a family of three ($17,373 in,.s. Census Bureau. Minority TAZs have less than 50 percent of the population identifying themselves as White, non-hispanic (see Table 23. CAMPO used the following data from the.s. Census Bureau to identify EJ TAZs: median family income levels; poverty data; and, ethnicity data. CAMPO 40 Plan EJ Analysis CAMPO analyzed the 40 transportation system to determine whether the system as envisioned would cause disproportionate negative impacts for the EJ population. Some of the road improvements include a tolling component, which may disproportionately burden low-income individuals. The plan also includes several Centers in EJ eas, focusing growth and economic opportunity. Map and Map 36 show the EJ eas and the planned 40 transportation system. Travel Time Analysis Travel time is one measure of equity in transportation. The distance traveled in a specified The interconnected network of existing and planned toll roads and express lanes form a regional toll network. Project sponsors evaluate the effects of toll roads and express lanes on the EJ community for individual road projects in accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA. CAMPO also evaluates the regional toll network for the effect of the total interconnected network on the EJ community. CAMPO will conduct the 40 Plan Regional Toll Network Analysis (RTA after the Transportation Policy Bod adopts the 40 Plan. CAMPO s most recent RTA includes all planned and potential toll projects, except for the IH express lanes. Given that IH traverses both EJ and non-ej eas, adding IH to the RTA may not change results signifiamount of time should be roughly the same whether the trip originated in an EJ ea or not. If EJ eas have a significant time or distance disadvantage comped to non-ej eas, then there e likely transportation system inequities. CAMPO analyzed travel times using output from the travel demand model. CAMPO selected representative sample EJ and non-ej zone pairs in Bastrop, Burnet, Caldwell, Hays, Travis, and Williamson counties. CAMPO selected EJ zones with high populations and non-ej zones based on compable distance from major roads and simil population as the EJ zones. CAMPO calculated five-minute travel time intervals from five to 30 minutes for both the EJ and non-ej zones for each zone pair, resulting in the ea (in sque miles covered for each five-minute travel interval. CAMPO comped the ea covered by each of the time intervals for each zone pair to determine whether there were any significant differences between the two. Since most people tend to think of their trips in five minute intervals, the ea covered by a five-minute interval for the EJ zone of the zone pair is used to determine significant differences. If the ea covered by an EJ zone five-minute interval is one half or less of the ea covered by a non-ej zone five-minute interval, then the EJ zone is initially determined to have a significant travel time disadvantage. Results of the travel time analysis for,, and 40 did not identify any significant differences in travel times between EJ and non-ej zones. This finding indicates that implementation of the 40 transportation system would not cause the EJ population any disproportionate negative impacts in terms of travel time. See Appendix H for detailed results of the travel time analysis. Regional Toll Network Analysis 152 CAMPO 40 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN

Table 24: Tolled Highways FM to SH N A 0 0 21.3 21.3 SH N to Scofield Ridge Pkwy Loop 1 14 3.1 0 17.1 IH- to S S SH 9.8 13.4 69.8 193 S N to SH SH N 39.7 0 33.6 73.3 IH- to SH SH SE 25.8 0.8 0 26.6 Total 189.3 17.3 124.7 331.3 Table 25: Non-Tolled Highways Guadalupe to Gonzales Co IH- 7.3 0 11.7 19 Bell Co to Comal Co IH- 234 1.2 62.1 497.3 Scofield Ridge to Davis Ln. Loop 1 5 24.2 84.1 113.3 S N to S. Blvd Loop 360 0 0.8 55.8 56.6 East of FM 969 to Colorado River SH 0 0 9.2 9.2 IH- to W. of Riverside Dr. SH 17.7 0 0 17.7 SH N to Springdale Rd S 46.5.7 30.2 87.4 Airport Blvd to S E 13.9 0 0 13.9 Pkwood Dr. to IH- W 14.9 2.8 22.4 40.1 Total 339.3 239.7 275.5 854.5 Table 26: Tolled Highways 40 S N to SH N A 0 0 58.3 58.3 SH N to Scofield Ridge Pkwy Loop 1 14 3.1 0 17.1 IH- to Guadalupe Co SH 2.1 13.2 87 302.3 S N to SH SH N 39.7 0 33.6 73.3 IH- to SH SH SE 25.8 0.8 0 26.6 Loop 1 to FM 1626 SH SW 0 0 13 13 FM 973 to SH SH E 3.6 0 0 3.6 Silvermine Rd. to S W SH W 0 0 5.1 5.1 S to SH S S 42.4 0 0 42.4 S S to FM 734 S E 34.4 0 0 34.4 West of Scenic Brook to Joe Tanner S W 0 0 17.7 17.7 Total 362 17.1 214.7 594 Planning 153

CAPITAL AREA METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION Table 27: Non-Tolled Highways 40 Guadalupe to Gonzales Co IH- 7.3 0 11.7 19 Bell Co to Comal Co IH- 234 1.2 62.1 497.3 Scofield Ridge to La Crosse Loop 1 5 24.2 92.6 121.8 S N to S. Blvd Loop 360 0 0.8 55.8 56.6 West of Colorado River to East of Loop 150 E SH 0 0 14.1 14.1 IH- to FM 973 SH 24.2 16 0 40.2 SH N to Springdale Rd S 46.5.7 30.2 87.4 Airport Blvd to S E 13.9 0 0 13.9 Pkwood Dr. to IH- W 14.9 2.8 22.4 40.1 Total 3.8 255.7 288.9 890.4 Table 28: Express Lanes 40 SH to Posey Rd IH- 72.4.6 19 137 FM 734 to Slaughter Ln Loop 1 1.8 7.2 32.1 41.1 SH N to Loop 1 S N 3.3 2.4.2 15.9 Total 77.5 55.2 60.1 192.8 All numbers in lane miles Networks used: HN_121714 and HN_111714 cantly. Please see the CAMPO website for the most recent RTA. EJ Lane Mile Analysis One way CAMPO evaluates equity in regds to tolling, is to measure the number of tolled lane miles in EJ and non-ej eas. Tables 24-28, which show tolled and non-tolled lane miles for the and 40 road networks, do not indicate a disproportionately negative impact eas. Elderly and Aging Population Nine percent of the CAMPO region s population is age 65 or older. CAMPO includes the aging and elderly as a population for additional consideration because many elderly do not drive and rely on public or other transportation services for critical trips (see Map 37 and Table. Disabled Population Table 30 illustrates that 15 percent of the CAMPO region s population had a disability, according to the 00.S. Census (the Census did not provide disability data at the census tract level, so the 00 Census is the most reliable available data source. In order to address the needs of both the aging and disabled populations, the CAMPO 40 Plan: Supports accessibility enhancements to fixedroute transit throughout the region; Calls for continued operation and enhancement of demand-response, door-to-door public transportation offered by providers throughout the region, including CARTS and Capital Metro; and, 154 CAMPO 40 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN

CAMPO Region Date: 2/23/15 Aging Population Map 37: Aging Population I BELL BRNET MILAM LLANO WILLIAMSON LEE TRAIS BLANCO BASTROP HAYS CALDWELL COMAL FAYETTE GADALPE 0 BEXAR 2.5 5 15 This map was developed by CAMPO for the purpose of aiding in regional transportation planning decisions and is not wranted for any other use. CAMPO makes no guantee regding its accuracy or completeness. If you would like to receive the GIS layers found on this map send your request to: campo@campotexas.org. Data Source: Census Author: GSG Document Path: H:\Maps\40 Plan Maps\Public Review Maps\Aging Population.mxd GONZALES Mi Aging Population as Percent of Total Population > 9% <= 9% Planning 155