arxiv: v1 [nucl-th] 9 Jun 2008

Similar documents
Hydrodynamical description of ultrarelativistic heavy-ion collisions

Hadronic equation of state and relativistic heavy-ion collisions

In this chapter we will discuss the effect of shear viscosity on evolution of fluid, p T

Relativistic Viscous Hydrodynamics for Multi-Component Systems with Multiple Conserved Currents

Heavy Ions at the LHC: First Results

arxiv: v1 [nucl-th] 2 Mar 2015

Nearly Perfect Fluidity: From Cold Atoms to Hot Quarks. Thomas Schaefer, North Carolina State University

Some Comments on Relativistic Hydrodynamics, Fuzzy Bag Models for the Pressure, and Early Space-Time Evolution of the QCD Matter

Viscosity of Quark-Gluon Plasma!

Status of viscous hydrodynamic code development

Strongly interacting quantum fluids: Experimental status

Beam energy scan using a viscous hydro+cascade model: an update

Towards new relativistic hydrodynamcis from AdS/CFT

Rapidity Dependence of Transverse Momentum Correlations from Fluctuating Hydrodynamics

Beam energy scan using a viscous hydro+cascade model

Divergence of the gradient expansion and the applicability of fluid dynamics Gabriel S. Denicol (IF-UFF)

arxiv: v1 [nucl-th] 11 Sep 2013

Introduction to Relativistic Hydrodynamics

Event-by-event distribution of azimuthal asymmetries in ultrarelativistic heavy-ion collisions

Recent lessons about hydrodynamics from holography

Anisotropic Hydrodynamics

Shear Viscosity of a strongly interacting system: Green-Kubo versus Chapman-Enskog and Relaxation Time Approximations

Uncertainties in the underlying e-by-e viscous fluid simulation

QGP, Hydrodynamics and the AdS/CFT correspondence

THERMALIZATION, ISOTROPIZATION AND FLOWS OF THE SHATTERED CGC

Strongly coupled plasma - hydrodynamics, thermalization and nonequilibrium behavior

Instabilities in the Quark-Gluon Plasma

Anisotropic fluid dynamics. Thomas Schaefer, North Carolina State University

Introduction to Relativistic Heavy Ion Physics

Thermalization of Color Glass Condensate within Partonic Cascade BAMPS and Comparison with Bottom-Up Scenario.

Relativistic hydrodynamics for heavy ion collisions can a macroscopic approach be applied to a microscopic system?

Relativistic hydrodynamics for heavy ion collisions can a macroscopic approach be applied to a microscopic system? Dirk H. Rischke

Mechanics of Materials and Structures

Quark-gluon plasma from AdS/CFT Correspondence

ELLIPTIC FLOW FROM THERMAL AND KLN INITIAL CONDITIONS

Hybrid Model of Heavy-Ion Collisions at BES Energies with Dynamical Sources

Bulk and shear viscosities for the Gribov-Zwanziger plasma

Fluid dynamics: theory and applications in heavy-ion physics

Hydrodynamics. Stefan Flörchinger (Heidelberg) Heidelberg, 3 May 2010

arxiv: v2 [nucl-th] 24 Sep 2012

arxiv:hep-ph/ v2 8 Aug 2002

Ultra-Relativistic Heavy Ion Collision Results

Scale invariant fluid dynamics for the dilute Fermi gas at unitarity

Space-time evolution of the Quark Gluon Plasma. Klaus Reygers / Kai Schweda Physikalisches Institut University of Heidelberg

Lectures on hydrodynamics - Part I: Ideal (Euler) hydrodynamics

Equilibration of Scalar Fields in an Expanding System

arxiv:nucl-th/ v2 2 Dec 2003

Hydrodynamics of the superfluid CFL phase and r-mode instabilities

arxiv:comp-gas/ v1 28 Apr 1993

Latest results from the EbyE NLO EKRT model. Eskola, K. J

Constraining the bulk viscosity of QCD

Hadron-string cascade versus hydrodynamics in Cu + Cu collisions at s NN = 200 GeV

Lecture 12: Hydrodynamics in heavy ion collisions. Elliptic flow Last lecture we learned:

Recent Results from RHIC: On the trail of the Quark-Gluon Plasma

Department of Physics

Azimuthal anisotropy of the identified charged hadrons in Au+Au collisions at S NN. = GeV at RHIC

Adrian Dumitru. pp, pa, AA: - forward dijets - near-side long-range rapidity correlations

Experimental signatures of perfect fluidity at RHIC. Derek Teaney Arkansas State University

Relativistic hydrodynamics for heavy-ion physics

Modelling Early Time Dynamics of Relativistic Heavy Ion Collisions

Causal Dissipation for the Relativistic Fluid Dynamics of Ideal Gases

Transport coefficients from Kinetic Theory: Bulk viscosity, Diffusion, Thermal conductivity. Debarati Chatterjee

Causal Viscous Hydrodynamics for RelaBvisBc Systems with MulB Components and MulB Conserved Currents

Phenomenology of Heavy-Ion Collisions

Strongly interacting quantum fluids: Transport theory

Hydrodynamical Model and Shear Viscosity from Black Holes (η/s from AdS/CFT)

Overview of anisotropic flow measurements from ALICE

Fluid dynamics for the unitary Fermi gas. Thomas Schaefer, North Carolina State University

Modeling Quark Gluon Plasma Using CHIMERA

Hints of incomplete thermalization in RHIC data

Hydrodynamic response to initial state fluctuations

PART 2. Formalism of rela,vis,c ideal/viscous hydrodynamics

(Nearly) perfect fluidity in cold atomic gases: Recent results. Thomas Schaefer North Carolina State University

arxiv: v1 [nucl-th] 9 Jul 2018

Perfect-fluid hydrodynamics for RHIC successes and problems

Ideal Hydrodynamics. Pasi Huovinen. JET Summer School. J. W. Goethe Universität. June 16, 2012, McGill University, Montreal, Canada

Fluid dynamic propagation of initial baryon number perturbations

Hydrodynamics and QCD Critical Point in Magnetic Field

Viscous Relativistic Hydrodynamics for heavy-ion collisions

J/Ψ-suppression in the hadron resonance gas

Conservation Laws on the Cooper-Frye Surface and Hadronic Rescattering. Hannah Petersen May 11, 2018, ECT*, Trento, Italy

Comparing Initial Conditions in a (3+1)d Boltzmann + Hydrodynamics Transport Approach

ECT*, Trento December 3, Collaborators: Vincenzo Greco Salvo Plumari Armando Puglisi Marco Ruggieri Francesco Scardina

Relativistic hydrodynamics at large gradients

AdS/CFT and Second Order Viscous Hydrodynamics

Second-Order Relativistic Hydrodynamics

arxiv: v2 [nucl-ex] 3 Jun 2008

Current Status of QGP hydro + hadron cascade approach

Hydrodynamic Fluctuations in relativistic heavy ion collisions

Resonances in Hadronic Transport

Collaborators: Aleksas Mazeliauskas (Heidelberg) & Derek Teaney (Stony Brook) Refs: , /25

Intersections of nuclear physics and cold atom physics

CHAPMAN-ENSKOG EXPANSION OF THE BOLTZMANN EQUATION AND ITS DIAGRAMMATIC INTERPRETATION

A Senior Honors Thesis

(Nearly) Scale invariant fluid dynamics for the dilute Fermi gas in two and three dimensions. Thomas Schaefer North Carolina State University

arxiv:nucl-ex/ v1 10 May 2004

Investigation of jet quenching and elliptic flow within a pqcd-based partonic transport model

(Super) Fluid Dynamics. Thomas Schaefer, North Carolina State University

arxiv: v1 [nucl-th] 28 Nov 2017

Equation of state. Pasi Huovinen Uniwersytet Wroc lawski. Collective Flows and Hydrodynamics in High Energy Nuclear Collisions

Transcription:

Dissipative effects from transport and viscous hydrodynamics arxiv:0806.1367v1 [nucl-th] 9 Jun 2008 1. Introduction Denes Molnar 1,2 and Pasi Huovinen 1 1 Purdue University, Physics Department, 525 Northwestern Ave West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA 2 RIKEN BNL Research Center, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, NY 11973, USA Abstract. We compare 2 2 covariant transport theory and causal Israel- Stewart hydrodynamics in 2+1D longitudinally boost invariant geometry with RHIC-like initial conditions and a conformal ε = 3p equation of state. The pressure evolution in the center of the collision zone and the final differential elliptic flow v 2 (p T ) from the two theories agree remarkably well for a small shear viscosity to entropy density ratio η/s 1/(4π), and also for a large cross section σ 50 mb. A key to this agreement is keeping all terms in the Israel- Stewart equations of motion. Our results indicate promising prospects for the applicability of Israel-Stewart dissipative hydrodynamics at RHIC, provided the shear viscosity of hot and dense quark-gluon matter is indeed very small for the relevant temperatures T 200 500 MeV. PACS numbers: 24.10.Lx, 24.10.Nz, 25.75.Ld Recent interest in heavy-ion physics has focused on constraining the transport properties of hot and dense nuclear matter using experimental data from RHIC. A particular open question is the effect of the conjectured minimal shear viscosity η = s/(4π) [1] on the dynamics and observables (s is the entropy density). Studies of dissipation require a suitable theory framework, in principle a non-equilibrium one. However, close to local equilibrium, one can also apply dissipative extensions of ideal (Euler) hydrodynamics [2, 3, 4]. The straightforward Navier-Stokes extension of relativistic ideal hydrodynamics with corrections linear in gradients leads to acausal behaviour and instabilities. An improved formulation proposed by Mueller and later extended by Israel and Stewart[5] (IS) includes second derivatives, which alleviates the causality problem. However, that theory originates from an arbitrary truncation of the entropy current at quadratic order in dissipative corrections (shear and bulk stress, and heat flow), which is not a controlled approximation. Derivations of the IS equations from kinetic theory again rely on an arbitrary truncation of nonequilibrium corrections to the phase space density at quadratic order in momentum (Grad s 14-moment approximation). In contrast, rigorous (Chapman-Enskog) expansion in small gradients near local equilibrium results in Navier-Stokes theory. Because of these uncertainties about the region of validity of Israel-Stewart theory, detailed cross-checks against a nonequilibrium approach are paramount. Here we

Dissipative effects from transport and viscous hydrodynamics 2 report on a comparison against covariant transport theory, for conditions expected in Au+Au at s NN 200 GeV at RHIC, and investigate the effect of small shear viscosities on the dynamics and differential elliptic flow v 2 (p T ). 2. Covariant transport and Israel-Stewart hydrodynamics We solve the equations of motion of causal Israel-Stewart dissipative hydrodynamics µ T µν = 0, µ N µ = 0 (1) Dπ µν = 1 τ π (π µν 2η µ u ν ) (u µ π να +u ν π αµ )Du α 1 2 πµν ( α u α +Dln β 2 µ )+2π λ T ων λ (2) T µν (ε+p)u µ u ν pg µν +π µν, N µ nu µ (3) in 2+1D longitudinally boost invariant geometry. Here ε, p, u µ, and n are the local energy density, pressure, flow velocity and particle density; D u µ µ ; the brackets denote traceless symmetrization and projection orthogonal to the flow A µν 1 2 µα νβ (A αβ +A βα ) 1 3 µν αβ A αβ, µν g µν u µ u ν, and µ µν ν. Inthe equationfortheshearstressπ µν weincludethe termwiththe vorticity tensor ω µν (1/2) µα νβ ( β u α α u β ) that follows from kinetic theory. The numerical IS solutions are obtained with a modified version of the code used in [7]. Details of the algorithm will be published elsewhere. Covariant transport solutions are calculated via the MPC algorithm [8, 9]. To aid comparison with covariant 2 2 transport theory, we take an ideal gas equation of state of massless particles, ε = 3p, and keep particle number conserved. For our conformal system bulk viscosity vanishes, while heat flow is ignored for simplicity. The shear viscosity and shear stress relaxation time of the fluid are matched to the values from kinetic theory [5, 6]: η 6T/(5σ) and τ π 2β 2 η 9λ MFP /5 (because β 2 = 3/4p), where an isotropic two-body cross section is utilized for simplicity. We consider two scenarios: i) a constant cross section, and ii) a cross section σ τ 2/3 growing with proper time τ t 2 z 2. During the initial one-dimensional expansion stage η/s τ 2/3 grows in the former case, while in the latter case η/s const. Initial conditions expected at RHIC for Au+Au at s NN 200 GeV and impact parameter b = 8 fm are modelled through an initial density profile proportional to the (local) number of binary collisions for diffuse gold nuclei, normalized to dn/dη(b = 0) = 1000 to account for the observed dn ch /dη 700. The system is assumed to start from local thermal equilibrium (π µν = 0) at a thermalization time τ 0 = 0.6 fm with uniform initial temperature T 0 = 385 MeV. 3. Main results Figure 1 compares the evolution of the transverse and longitudinal pressure from covariant transport (lines with symbols) and IS hydrodynamics (lines without symbols), averaged over the center of the collision zone r T x 2 +y 2 < 1 fm for η/s 1/(4π). At such a low shear viscosity, we find that IS hydrodynamics is a good approximation to covariant transport in the densest region of the collision.

Dissipative effects from transport and viscous hydrodynamics 3 Figure 1. Proper time evolution of the average transverse (T xx, solid) and longitudinal pressure (T zz, dashed) in covariant transport (symbols) and causal Israel-Stewart hydrodynamics (no symbols) near the center of the collision zone (r T < 1 fm) for RHIC-like initial conditions (see text) and η/s 1/(4π). For clarity, T zz is divided by a factor of 10. In order to calculate momentum distributions, a freezeout prescription is necessary. Here we apply Cooper-Frye (sudden) freezeout dn dyd 2 = dσ µ (x)p µ f(x, p), (4) p T where f is the phasespace density corresponding to the local fluid variables and dσ µ is the local normal to the freezeout hypersurface. We choose a constant density hypersurface n = 0.365 fm 3, which is the density of an ideal gas of massless gluons in chemical equilibrium at T = 120 MeV (3 colours). Figure 2(left) shows elliptic flow from IS hydrodynamics as a function of transverse momentum, for the η/s 1/(4π) scenario. The dashed curve corresponds to (4) with the local equilibrium ansatz f eq (x, p) = n(x)/[8πt(x) 3 ]exp[ p µ u µ /T(x)] (we use Boltzmann statistics for consistent comparison with transport). This incorporates dissipative corrections to the evolution of the flow field, temperature and particle number density, but ignores nonequilibrium distortions of the local momentum distributions (i.e., assumes π µν = 0). The solid curve is the result for [ f(x, p) = f eq (x, p) 1+ pµ p ν ] π µν (x) 8n(x)T 3 (5) (x) that properly takes the local shear stress into account. We find that relative to ideal hydrodynamics(dotted curve), dissipation reduces elliptic flow by 30%, even at such a low η/s 1/(4π). This reinforces an earlier kinetic theory estimate [10]. Unlike [4], we find that at least one third of the reduction comes from corrections to the ideal hydrodynamicvariables(the lowerthe p T, the largerthe fraction), while the remaining up to two-thirds come from shear stress altering the local momentum distributions. Finally, we compare in Figure 2(right) differential elliptic flow v 2 (p T ) between covariant transport (squares) and IS hydrodynamics (dashed and solid). The dotted line is the ideal hydrodynamics reference. For σ gg gg 47 mb as in [9] we find excellent agreement between transport and IS hydro (open squares vs dashed line). We also find good agreement for η/s 1/(4π) (filled squares vs solid line), for which

Dissipative effects from transport and viscous hydrodynamics 4 Figure 2. Left: Elliptic flow as a function of p T for Au + Au at snn 200 GeV and b = 8 fm from ideal hydrodynamics (dotted) and IS hydrodynamics with Cooper-Frye freezeout ignoring (dashed) or incorporating (solid) dissipative corrections to the local momentum distributions (see text) for η/s 1/(4π). Right: Comparison of v 2 (p T ) from covariant transport (squares) and IS hydrodynamics (lines) for η/s 1/(4π) (open squares vs dashed), and σ gg gg 47 mb (filled squares vs solid). The ideal hydro reference is also shown (dotted). IS hydro somewhat underpredicts the transport results at higher p T > 1.5 GeV. We cautionthatthehydroresultsathighp T arealsosensitivetothefreezeoutprescription, which deserves further investigation. The modest 30% dissipative corrections found agree well with [2] and are much smaller than the effect in [3]. We suspect that this is because [3] ignored the first term in the second line of (2). If the system is near global equilibrium, that is appropriate. On the other hand, RHIC-like initial conditions have large gradients, and our comparison to kinetic theory shows that in that case those terms are important. 4. Conclusions See abstract. Acknowledgements. We thank RIKEN, Brookhaven National Laboratory and the US Department of Energy [DE-AC02-98CH10886] for providing facilities essential for the completion of this work. References [1] P Kovtun, D T Son and A O Starinets 2005, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 111601 [2] P Romatschke U Romatschke 2007, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 172301 [3] H Song and U W Heinz 2008, Phys. Lett. B 658, 279 [4] K Dusling and D Teaney 2008, Phys. Rev. C 77, 034905 [5] W Israel, 1976, Ann. Phys. 100, 310; W Israel, J M Stewart 1979, Ann. Phys. 118, 349 [6] S R de Groot, W A van Leeuwen, Ch G van Weert 1980, Relativistic kinetic theory - Principles and applications, Chs. V, VI. [7] P Huovinen, 2005 Nucl. Phys. A 761, 296 [8] D Molnar and M Gyulassy 2000, Phys. Rev. C 62, 054907 [9] D Molnar and P Huovinen 2005, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 012302

Dissipative effects from transport and viscous hydrodynamics 5 [10] D Molnar 2008, arxiv:0806.0026