Narrow-Gap Semiconductors, Spin Splitting With no Magnetic Field and more.. Giti Khodaparast Department of Physics Virginia Tech Supported by: NFS-DMR-0507866 AFOSR Young Investigator Award University of Virginia, Oct 11 th 2007
InSb Based Samples J. K. Furdyna, InMnSb Department of Physics, University of Notre Dame, M. B. Santos, InSb QWs Department of Physics & Astronomy, University of Oklahoma
III-V V Semiconductors
InSb Quantum Wells δ-doped Si δ-doped Si δ -doped Si InSb cap 100Å Al x In 1-x Sb Top Layer 100Å Al x In 1-x Sb Spacer 1000Å Al x In (1-x) Sb Barrier 300Å InSb Well 11.5 nm to 30nm Al x In (1-x). Sb Barrier 300Å Al x In 1-x Sb Layer 600Å Al x In 1-x Sb Buffer 4μm AlSb Buffer 2150Å GaAs (001) substrate Density: 1-4x10 11 cm -2 Mobility: 100,000-200,000 cm 2 /Vs Alloy concentration: 9%, 15% Intel and Qinetiq researchers have recently demonstrated prototype InSb quantum well transistors. InSb QW has the lowest energy dissipation and gate delay which is an important metric for logic microprocessors. Single electron charging effect in a surfacegated InSb/AlInSb has been reported. Tim Ashley s group, New Journal of Physics, 9, (2007) S. J. Chung, N. Goel, M. B. Santos, University of Oklahoma
Basic Characteristics m*/m o g-factor E(k) GaAs 0.067-0.5 Least non-parabolic InAs 0.023-15 More non-parabolic InSb 0.014-51 Most non-parabolic
InSb Based Heterostructures An ideal model of a narrow-gap semiconductor Small effective mass, large g-factor Small e-e interaction Large spin-orbit coupling
Quantum Hall Effect in InSb Rxy (h/e 2 ) 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 2 1 2/3 1.4K 33mK Shubnikov de Haas oscillations down to low B (0.4T) Spin splitting resolved at starting at low B (>0.8T) 2 0.05 2/3 9 5 Integer Quantum Hall Effect Rxx (kω) 1 0.00 0 2 2 1 1/2 No evidence of Fractional Quantum Hall Effect, but not insulating at ν<1 0 0 5 10 15 B (T) S. J. Chung et al. Physica E7, 809 (2000) Ballistic transport in InSb mesoscopic structures Hong Chen, J.J. Heremans, J.A. Peters, N. Goel, S.J. Chung, and M.B. Santos, Applied Physics Letters 84, 5380 (2004)
Intensity Anomaly in Spin-Split Split CR, InSb/AlInSb QW Landau level calculation predicts that blue transition is stronger but experiment determines that red transition is stronger! Spin Effects in InSb Quantum Wells, G.A. Khodaparast, et al., Physica E20, 386 (2004).
Narrow Gap : Revisited I SD Normal Field Effective Transistor (FET) Spin Field Effective Transistor: Datta and Das, 1990, APL. Phys. Lett., 56, 665 Spin Polarized FET V G
InSb Quantum Well Structures Symmetric quantum well InSb Al x In 1-x Sb Al x In 1-x Sb Asymmetric quantum well X Al x In 1-x Sb InSb Al x In 1-x Sb Z Ez V B eff =E V/c Y
Zero Field Spin Splitting E K E 2 2 sub h kt = Ez + * 2m ± α k t Asymmetry of the confining potential in a QW remove the degeneracy of band structure Rashba effect Bulk Inversion asymmetry is known as Dresselhaus effect Zero Field Spin Splitting, Rashba (J. Phys. C 17, 6039 1983) or Dresselhaus effects (Phys Rev 100, 580, 1995)
Spin Polarized Current E Jx (a) E (b) CB +1/2> -1/2> σ+ CB -1/2> +3/2> -3/2> +1/2> Jx HH 0 K x K - x 0 K + x K x S. D. Ganichev and W. Prettl, J. Phys: Condens. Matter 15 (2003) R935-R983
Rashba Splitting at B>0 J. Luo, et al. PRB, 41,7685 (1990) In addition to: E(k)=ħ 2 k 2 /2m ±αk Y.A. Bychkov and E.I. Rashba, J. Phys. C 17, 6039 (1984); Y.A. Bychkov and E.E. Rashba, [JETP Lett. 39, 78 (1984)] Change in g* at low magnetic field G. A. Khodaparast, et al. Phys. Rev. B 70, 155322 (2004)
Electron Spin Resonance in InSb QWs ΔRxx (arb. unit) n = 1.3x10 11 cm -2 λ = 432μm 45 o tilt ν=3 ESR ν=5 ν=4 ΔR xx (arb. units) CR S644, 4.2K 30 o tilt λ = 184μm ESR CR ν = 7 6 5 4 3 0 1 2 B(T) 0 1 2 3 B (T) G. A. Khodaparast et al., Spectroscopy of Rashba spin splitting in InSb quantum wells, Phys. Rev. B 70, 155322 (2004),
Our Motivation To understand charge/spin dynamics in narrow gap structures To study phenomena such as interband and intraband photogalvanic effects, in order to generate spin polarized current To probe the effect of magnetic impurities on the spin/charge dynamics
Spin Relaxation Process Elliot-Yafet Mechanism Wave function of the electron is a mixture of spin up and spin down states, with a finite probability of a flip of the spin during scattering events even for spin-conserving scattering process. D'yakonov-Perel Mechanism System acts as if in a magnetic field dependent on wavevector k Spins precess in the field, and relax as k varies due to scattering B(k) B(k )
Spin Relaxation Time [τ[ s ] E-Y Y Mechanism: D-P P Mechanism: PRB, Volume 74,075331 2006 τ p => momentum relaxation time
Fast or Slow Relaxation? Kimberley Hall, Michael FLATTÉ (APL, 88, 162503 (2006) DAVID D. AWSCHALOM AND MICHAEL E. FLATTÉ Nature physics VOL 3 MARCH 2007
Kerr 130 years ago!! Change in the polarization state when a linearly polarized light reflected from a soft polished iron pole- piece of a strong electromagnet. K Eip K Eis M Ers Erp
Time Resolved Spectroscopy Time Resolved Faraday/Kerr Effect
Experimental Setup
Spin Relaxation Equilibrium Excitation Recombination Non-equilibrium http://www.physics.ucsb.edu/~awschalom/
Test Spin Decoherence in GaAs We observed in GaAs but not in our narrow gap semiconductors!!
Al x In 1-x Sb Band Gap 77 K, ~530 mev RT, ~470 mev 2.6 μm 477 mev AlInSb InSb AlInSb Dia et al., Appl. Phys. Lett. 73, 3132 (1998) Univ. of Oklahoma
InSb QWs Low Fluence and Degenerate -40 0 40 80 Sample S1 MOKE (1 mv per div.) d) 77K Fluence 50 μj/cm 2 ΔR/R (2% per div.) Pump 800 nm Photo-Induced Carrier density ~10 17 cm -3-40 0 40 Time Delay (ps) 80
InSb QWs,, Pump 2 μm, Probe 800 nm MO KE (0.5 μv Per Div.) (b) Fluence 5 mj/cm 2 RT InSb QW 30nm Pump 2 μm Probe 800nm ΔR/R (2% Per Div.) Pump 2 μm Probe 800nm InSb QW 30 nm 0 2 4 6 Time Delay (ps) 8 10-4 0 4 T ime Delay (ps) 8 12
InSb,, 11.5 nm wide QW, Pump 2.6 μm, Probe 800 nm 10 mj/cm 2 MOKE (100 μv Per Div.) InSb QW 11.5 nm (c) Pump 2.6 μm Probe 800 nm 77 K 5 mj/cm 2 Pumping only inside the QW 2 mj/cm 2-5 0 5 10 15 20 Time Delay (ps)
Spin Relaxation in Narrow Gap Semiconductors Boggess et al., Appl. Phys., Lett., 77, 1333 (2000). Murzyn et al., Appl. Phys., Lett., 83, 5220(2003). Hall et al., Phys. Rev. B., 68, 115311(2003). Murdin et al., Phys. Rev. B, 72, 085346 (2005) Litvinenko et al., Phys. Rev. B, 74, 075331 (2006). For thicknesses larger than 1 microns, spin relaxations 20-50 ps For thin InAs 0.15 micron, spin relaxation of ~ 1 ps has been reported Litvinenko et al., New Journal of Physics 8, 49, (2006) In InSb QWs reported relaxations below 2 ps!! Recent transport measurements on our InSb QW samples suggest spin coherence time of ~ 12 ps. (Prof. Jean Heremans group at VT)
Narrow Gap Ferromagnetic Semiconductors Most current understanding of III-Mn-V : Small lattice constants Large gap and Small hole effective masses Such as GaMnAs There are observations where the photo-induced spin relaxation is influenced by Mn ions, Wang et al., J. Phys.: Condens. Matter, 18, R501 (2006) and there are cases which no interaction has been observed, Kimel, et al. PRL, 92, 237203 (2004)
CW Optical Control of Ferromagnetism S. Koshihara et al., PRL 78, 4617 (1997); A. Oiwa et al., APL 78, 518 (2001). Light-induced induced ferromagnetism Light-induced induced coercivity decrease
InMnSb Films Mn Content 2.0-2.8%, 2.8%, p~ 2x10 20 Tc= 10K cm - 3, μ ~ 100 cm 2 /Vs 20 cm InMnSb (0.23 μm) InSb buffer layer (0.1 μm) CdTe substrate (4.5 μm) GaAs substrate T.Wojtowicz, X. Liu, J.K Furdyna, University of Notre Dame
InMnSb Based Ferromagnetic Structures MCD (%) 10 T(K) 1.55 2.1 4 6 5 8 9 15 100 0-5 (a) ρ Hall (B) (mωcm) 40 20 0-20 (b) Negative R A, not expected for a p-type structure R A positive in GaMnAs,InMnAs negative in GaMnSb, not fully understood -10-400 -200 0 200 400 Magnetic field (Gs) -40 400 200 0-200 -400 Magnetic field (Gs) Wojtowicz T, Appl. Phys. Lett. 82, 4310, 2003 Wojtowicz T, Physica E20, 325, 2004 Large spin-orbit coupling
Fluence Dependence of Relaxation Times InMnSb(B) Fluence 20 μj/cm 2 Photo-induced 10 17 cm -2 MOKE (50µV Per Div.) Fluence 20 μj/cm 2 850 nm (c) ΔR/R (10% per Div.) -10-5 0 5 Time Delay (ps) 10 15 MOKE (20 μv Per Div.) (b) 77 K RT Pump 1.3 μm Probe 800 nm Fluence 5 mj/cm 2 Photo-induced 10 19 cm -2-2 0 2 Time Delay (ps) 4
InMnSb Samples, Different Mn Effusion Cell Temp 12x10-3 11 MOKE (V) 10 9 8 Fluence 50 μj/cm 2 800 nm, 5 K 800 nm, 5 K 800 nm, 5K (0.7 T) -2-1 0 1 Time Delay (ps) 2 3 MOKE (1 mv Per Div.) Fluence 50 μj/cm 2 InMnSb(C) σ+ σ 77 K 850 nm (d) ΔR/R (10% Per Div.) -100-50 0 50 100 Time Delay (ps)
Temperature Dependence of InMnSb MOKE Signal (0.5 mv Per. Div.) (a) Sample A 5K Sample D 2 K Pump/Probe 800 nm MOKE Signal (0.5 mv Per. Div.) (b) Sample D (2.8% Mn) 25 K 77 K 2 K Pump/Probe 800 nm -4 0 4 Time Delay (ps) 8-2 0 2 4 Time Delay (ps) 6 8 K. Nontapot et al., APL, 90, 143109 (2007)
Dynamics in InMnAs Photoinduced MOKE Signal (10-5 V) 0-2 -4-6 0 Photoinduced MOKE 1 2 Time Delay (ps) 3 ΔR/R (%) 0.0-0.5-1.0-1.5-2.0-2.5 0 Reflectivity 1 2 3 Time Delay (ps) J. Wang J, G. A. Khodaparast, J. Kono, T. Slupinski, A. Oiwa, and H. Munekata Journal of Modern Optics 51, 2771,2004
Summary/Future Plans We have explored spin/charge dynamics in a series of Narrow Gap Semiconductors We can alter the relaxation as a function of photo-induced The relaxations in ferromagnetic samples very much depends on the sample properties Working on spin-polarized current generation Fabricating 1-D system to probe the dynamics in lower dimensions Taking advantages of the FEL to probe the conduction bands
Inter subband Dynamics 0.5 0.4 0.3 ΔT/T 0.2 0.1 0 0 100 200 300 400 Time Delay (ps) 1.5K Differential Transmission Interband Pumping (800 nm) Probe Beam (42 μm) Undoped InSb MQW containing 25 periods of 35 nm InSb wells
Group Members Brett, Emily, Kanokwan, Matt, Rajeev Jonathan and Ashley
Thank you for your attention
Time Resolved Cyclotron Measurements Interband pump + Intraband probe (T 0 -T)/T 0 Monitor dynamics of relaxing carriers in conduction band directly in time: B (T) Delay (ps) Effective mass Density Scattering time m*(t) n(t) τ(t) G. A. Khodaparast et al, PRB 67 035307 (2003)
Relaxations in Undoped InSb QW Time Delay (ps) -80-40 0 40 80 MOKE (0.5 mv per Div.) 77 K Pump/Probe 775 nm 24 MQW (30nm wells) Fluence 50 μj/cm 2 ΔR/R (7% per Div.) Photo-Induced Carrier density ~10 17 cm -3 Carrier/Spin lifetime longer than 40ps -40 0 40 Time Delay (ps) 80 Undoped InSb MQW containing 25 periods of 30 nm InSb wells