When will Voyager 1 and 2 cross the termination shock?

Similar documents
Modern Multi-component Models of the Heliospheric Interface

A Multi-ion Model of the Heliosphere with Secondary Charge Exchange

X (A.U.) Z (A.U.)

Interpretation of Pioneer 10 heliospheric Ly α glow data obtained beyond 30 AU

arxiv:astro-ph/ v1 13 Sep 2005

Mass transport in the heliosphere by energetic neutral atoms

Boundary conditions of the heliosphere

Interstellar Neutral Atoms and Their Journey Through the Heliosphere Elena Moise

What is New in the Outer Heliosphere?: Voyager and IBEX

Heliolatitudinal and time variations of the solar wind mass flux: Inferences from the backscattered solar Lyman-alpha intensity maps

VOYAGER 1, VOYAGER 2, AND PIONEER 10 Ly DATA AND THEIR INTERPRETATION

Hydrogen wall and heliosheath Ly A absorption toward nearby stars: Possible constraints on the heliospheric interface plasma flow

Interstellar and Interplanetary Material. HST Astrobiology Workshop: May 5-9, 2002 P.C. Frisch University of Chicago

arxiv: v2 [astro-ph.sr] 19 May 2014

How are the present solar minimum conditions transmitted to the outer heliosphere and heliosheath? John Richardson M.I.T.

Modeling Secondary Neutral Helium in the Heliosphere

Title: Multi-ion, multi-fluid 3-D magnetohydrodynamic simulation of the outer heliosphere

THE GLOBAL SOLAR WIND BETWEEN 1 AU AND THE TERMINATION SHOCK

arxiv:astro-ph/ v2 31 Jul 2003

Magnetic Effects Change Our View of the Heliosheath

Temporal and spectral variations of anomalous oxygen nuclei measured by Voyager 1 and Voyager 2 in the outer heliosphere

COMPOSITION OF ANOMALOUS COSMIC RAYS AND OTHER HELIOSPHERIC IONS A. C. Cummings, E. C. Stone, and C. D. Steenberg

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph.sr] 20 Sep 2016

What do we know about the orientation of the Local Interstellar Magnetic Field?

Interstellar Gas Inside the Heliosphere

Anomalous cosmic rays in the distant heliosphere and the reversal of the Sun s magnetic polarity in Cycle 23

Effects of the solar wind termination shock and heliosheath on the heliospheric modulation of galactic and anomalous Helium

The Energetic Particle Populations of the Distant Heliosphere

Energetic Neutral Atoms: An Additional Source for Heliospheric Pickup Ions

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph.sr] 29 Sep 2015

Solar Wind Turbulent Heating by Interstellar Pickup Protons: 2-Component Model

HELIOSPHERIC RADIO EMISSIONS

Lyman-alpha Radiation Pressure in the Heliosphere: Results from a 3D Monte Carlo Radiative

The Voyager Journey to the Giant Planets and Interstellar Space

Mesoscale Variations in the Heliospheric Magnetic Field and their Consequences in the Outer Heliosphere

Pickup Proton Instabilities and Scattering in the Distant Solar Wind and the Outer Heliosheath: Hybrid Simulations

arxiv: v1 [physics.space-ph] 12 Feb 2015

Confronting Observations and Modeling: The Role of the Interstellar Magnetic Field in Voyager 1 and 2 Asymmetries

Confronting Observations and Modeling: The Role of The Interstellar Magnetic Field in Voyager 1 and 2 Asymmetries

ESS 200C. Lectures 6 and 7 The Solar Wind

Pickup Ion Effect of the Solar Wind Interaction with the Local Interstellar Medium

Heliospheric Structure: The Bow Wave and the Hydrogen Wall 1

W.R. Webber 1 and D.S. Intriligator 2

Polar Coronal Holes During Solar Cycles 22 and 23

Coordinated observation of local interstellar helium in the Heliosphere

The Solar Wind in the Outer Heliosphere

A new mechanism to account for acceleration of the solar wind

Interstellar Pickup Ion Observations to 38 AU

Relation between the solar wind dynamic pressure at Voyager 2 and the energetic particle events at Voyager 1

Cosmic Rays in the Dynamic Heliosphere

The Interstellar Hydrogen Shadow: Observations of Interstellar Pickup Ions Beyond Jupiter

Correlation between energetic ion enhancements and heliospheric current sheet crossings in the outer heliosphere

PLASMA FLOWS IN THE HELIOSHEATH ALONG THE VOYAGER 1 AND 2 TRAJECTORIES DUE TO EFFECTS OF THE 11 YR SOLAR CYCLE

HELIOSPHERIC RESPONSE TO DIFFERENT POSSIBLE INTERSTELLAR ENVIRONMENTS

Local Interstellar Hydrogen's Disappearance at 1AU: Four Years of IBEX in the rising solar cycle.

Voyager observations of galactic and anomalous cosmic rays in the helioshealth

IBEX observations of heliospheric energetic neutral atoms: Current understanding and future directions

THE OUTER HELIOSPHERE: SOLAR WIND, COSMIC RAY AND VLF RADIO EMISSION VARIATIONS

THE PHYSICS OF PARTICLE ACCELERATION BY COLLISIONLESS SHOCKS

Imprints from the solar cycle on the helium atom and helium pickup ion distributions

Interstellar Medium V1

Space Weather at 75 AU

Plasma properties at the Voyager 1 crossing of the heliopause

Deformation of ICME and MC on 1 30 AU Seen by Voyager 2 and WIND

Interstellar He + ring-beam distributions: Observations and implications

Effects of Anomalous Cosmic Rays on the Structure of the Outer Heliosphere

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph.ga] 6 Jan 2014

Challenges to. Future Outer Heliosphere. and Interstellar Probes. Science. Mission. Technology,

Solar wind termination shock and heliosheath effects on the modulation of protons and antiprotons

Instrumentation for Interstellar Exploration

Science Questions from inside 150AU Heliosheath/Heliopause. Merav Opher Boston University

The cosmic rays mediated nonpolytropic solar wind interacting with the interstellar neutral matter

Heliosphere in a strong interstellar magnetic field

COSMIC-RAY ENERGY CHANGES IN THE HELIOSPHERE. II. THE EFFECT ON K-CAPTURE ELECTRON SECONDARIES

Observations of interstellar helium pickup ions in the inner heliosphere

Galactic cosmic rays measured by UVS on Voyager 1 and the end of the modulation. Is the upwind heliopause a collapsed charge-exchange layer?

with two-component circumsolar interstellar cloud: Mutual influence of thermal plasma and galactic cosmic rays

Cosmic-Ray Transport in the Heliosphere

In situ Investigations of the Local Interstellar Medium. Science Mission Technology, TRL

GALACTIC COSMIC-RAY MODULATION USING A SOLAR MINIMUM MHD HELIOSPHERE: A STOCHASTIC PARTICLE APPROACH

The Sun's Dynamic Influence on the Outer Heliosphere, the Heliosheath, and the Local Interstellar Medium

A Time-dependent and Anisotropic Force Field Model For Galactic Cosmic Ray Flux

Elastic collisions of interstellar helium atoms with solar wind protons

Caltech, 2 Washington University, 3 Jet Propulsion Laboratory 4. Goddard Space Flight Center

Probing the Edge of the Solar System: Formation of an Unstable Jet-Sheet

Multifractal Structures Detected by Voyager 1 at the Heliospheric Boundaries

Limitations of the force field equation to describe cosmic ray modulation

Instrumentation for interstellar exploration

IBEX discoveries over a half decade of observing the outer heliosphere

Survey of the Solar System. The Sun Giant Planets Terrestrial Planets Minor Planets Satellite/Ring Systems

Interstellar flow longitude from pickup ion cut-off observations at 1 AU with STEREO and ACE

Where is the Cosmic-Ray Modulation Boundary of the Heliosphere? and Applied Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing , China

Dust Destruction and Ion Formation in the Inner Solar System

Space Physics: Recent Advances and Near-term Challenge. Chi Wang. National Space Science Center, CAS

The Interstellar Boundary Explorer (IBEX)

Weaker solar wind from the polar coronal holes and the whole Sun

Evolving outer heliosphere: Large scale stability and time variations observed by the Interstellar Boundary Explorer

ICMES at very large distances

THE UNFOLDING OF THE SPECTRA OF LOW ENERGY GALACTIC COSMIC RAY H AND HE NUCLEI AS THE VOYAGER 1 SPACECRAFT EXITS THE REGION OF HELIOSPHERIC MODULATION

Evolving outer heliosphere: Large-scale stability and time variations observed by the Interstellar Boundary Explorer

Transcription:

GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, VOL.???, NO.??, PAGES 1 15, SOMETIME 2002 When will Voyager 1 and 2 cross the termination shock? Vlad Izmodenov 1, George Gloeckler 2, Yuri Malama 3 (1) Lomonosov Moscow State University, Department of Aeromechanics and Gas Dynamics, Faculty of Mathematics and Mechanics, Russia (2) Department of Physics and IPST, University of Maryland, USA (3) Institute for Problems in Mechanics, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia Vlad Izmodenov, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Department of Aeromechanics and Gas Dynamics, Faculty of Mechanics and Mathematics, Moscow, 119899, Russia (izmod@ipmnet.ru) George Gloeckler, Department of Physics and IPST, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742, USA (gg10@umail.umd.edu) Yuri Malama, Institute for Problems in Mechanics, Russian Academy of Sciences, Prospect Vernadskogo 101-1, Moscow, 117526, Russia (malama@ipmnet.ru)

2 IZMODENOV ET AL.: WHEN WILL VOYAGER 1 AND 2 CROSS THE TERMINATION SHOCK? Abstract. Our Solar System moves through a warm (ο6,500 K), partly ionized local interstellar cloud (LIC) with a relative speed of ο26 km/s. The solar wind interacts with the LIC to form a cavity around the Sun called the heliosphere. The solar wind meets the interstellar charged component at the heliopause, where solar wind pressure balances the pressure of the LIC. Before reaching the heliopause, the supersonic solar wind is decelerated at an extended shock wave, the heliospheric termination shock (TS). The two Voyager spacecraft are cruising away from the Sun and approaching the termination shock. Here we present predictions of when the Voyagers will encounter the termination shock by calculating the position of the TS using a numerical multi-component model of the heliospheric interface and improved measurements of interstellar H atoms. Interstellar atoms penetrate into the heliosphere where they are ionized and detected as pickup ions by the SWICS instrument on Ulysses. We conclude that the most probable crossing of the termination shock by Voyager 1 will occur between 2007 and 2012.

IZMODENOV ET AL.: WHEN WILL VOYAGER 1 AND 2 CROSS THE TERMINATION SHOCK? 3 1. Introduction The solar wind interacts with the LIC to form the heliospheric interface, which separates pristine interstellar medium from the unperturbed solar wind. At the heliopause, which separates the solar wind from the interstellar charged components, the solar wind pressure balances the pressure of the LIC. Since the solar wind is a supersonic flow, the heliospheric termination shock (TS) is expected be formed, making the solar wind subsonic before it reaches the heliopause. The Voyagers 1 and 2 spacecraft are moving away from the Sun at 3.6 and 3.3 per year respectively and are thus approaching the termination shock believed to be roughly around 100 AU. In January 2003 Voyager 1, the most distant spacecraft, will be at about ο87 AU. The termination shock crossing by Voyagers has been anticipated for a long time and it is therefore important to update predictions when each of them will cross the termination shock. Different types of remote diagnostics can be used to estimate the time of Voyagers encounters with the termination shock. A summary of five different methods previously used to estimate the termination shock location was presented recently by Stone [2001], who concluded that Voyager 1 would most likely have one or more encounters with the termination shock by 2005. In this paper we use updated measurements of pickup H + by the Solar Wind Ion Composition Spectrometer (SWICS) on Ulysses [Gloeckler et al., 1992] in the slow solar wind at ο5 AU and low latitude. This method provides the most accurate determination of the density of interstellar H atoms inside the heliosphere near the TS. We will use results of this determination of the neutral H density as one of the constraints on the LIC proton and neutral hydrogen densities which determine the dominant components of the LIC pressure.

4 IZMODENOV ET AL.: WHEN WILL VOYAGER 1 AND 2 CROSS THE TERMINATION SHOCK? 2. Model of the heliospheric interface In this work we used the heliospheric interface model developed and advanced by the Moscow group [Baranov and Malama, 1993, Izmodenov et al., 1999; Alexashov et al.,2000; Myasnikov et al., 2000; Zaitsev and Izmodenov, 2001; for reviews see also Zank, 1999; Izmodenov, 2001] ] to calculate the neutral hydrogen density at the termination shock and to predict its location. Theoretical studies of the heliospheric interface began more than four decades ago. Our latest model provides a realistic theoretical description of the heliospheric interface, taking account of the multi-component nature of both the LIC and the solar wind. In this axisymmetric model, a one-fluid approach is used to describe plasma component (electrons, protons and pickup ions), while a kinetic approach is used to describe H atoms in the heliospheric interface. The latter approach is required to describe H atoms because their mean free path is comparable to the size of the heliosphere [see, e.g., Izmodenov et al., 2000]. The charged and neutral components interact by charge exchange. Galactic cosmic rays do not influence the termination shock and the distribution of interstellar atoms in the heliosphere [Myasnikov et al., 2000]. Therefore, we disregard the GCR in the present work. Neither the direction nor the magnitude of the interstellar magnetic field is presently known. However, it is believed that the magnetic field is weak [Gloeckler et al., 1997]. We have included a weak magnetic field, B= 2 10 6 Gauss in our model, but find that such a field has only a minor effect on the location of the termination shock and on the atomic H distribution [Alexashov et al., 2000]. Influence of pickup ions on the solar wind plasma flow in the outer heliosphere is taken into account using the relevant parts of momentum and energy equations for the plasma components. In the global model we assume immediate assimilation of pickup protons into the solar wind flow. This approach is reasonable for prediction of the TS location, because it satisfies basic conservation laws of mass,

IZMODENOV ET AL.: WHEN WILL VOYAGER 1 AND 2 CROSS THE TERMINATION SHOCK? 5 momentum and energy. Since Anomalous Cosmic Rays (ACRs) mainly affect the structure of the termination shock, forming a precursor, and do not influence significantly its location [Chalov and Fahr, 1997; le Roux and Fichtner, 1997], we neglect ACRs. Among interstellar parameters influencing the heliospheric interface structure, the LIC velocity relative to the Sun and the temperature of the local interstellar gas are now well established by direct measurements of interstellar helium atoms by the GAS instrument on Ulysses [Witte et al., 1996]. Unlike interstellar H atoms, neutral He penetrate the heliospheric interface almost undisturbed, because of the negligible strength of the coupling with protons due to small cross sections of elastic collisions and charge exchange. Therefore, measurements of He inside the heliosphere can be used to determine its characteristics in the LIC. In this paper we use the latest values for temperature of the interstellar gas of 6500 K and the speed of the LIC relative to the Sun of 26.4 km/s [ Witte, private communication]. The temperature and speed determine the Mach number, which is about 2 for the interstellar medium. Since the solar wind is also supersonic, a two-shock interface is formed in the LIC/SW interaction (Figure 1). The heliopause is a contact discontinuity, separating the interstellar plasma from the solar wind. The heliospheric termination shock decelerates the solar wind from supersonic to subsonic. The bow shock decelerates the supersonic interstellar gas before it reaches the heliopause. While interstellar H atoms interact with the plasma mainly by charge exchange, both photoionization and electron impact ionization are also important near the Sun and in the heliosheath, and these effects are included in our model. We use the Ulysses (SWOOPS) averaged solar wind parameters for the 2-year time period 1997.108-1999.108 to determine the average locations of the boundaries shown in Figure 1. The

6 IZMODENOV ET AL.: WHEN WILL VOYAGER 1 AND 2 CROSS THE TERMINATION SHOCK? average values of the solar wind speed and proton number density at 1 AU were 432 km/s and 7.39 cm 3, respectively. The remaining two important input parameters required to calculate the location of the TS are the interstellar proton number density, n p;lic and the the neutral H number density, n H;LIC. These parameters cannot be measured directly. To obtain best estimates of these important LIC parameters that influence the position of the termination shock we use the following constraints in this paper: (1) SWICS/Ulysses measurements of pickup ions; (2) measurements of ionization of interstellar helium by the Extreme Ultraviolet Explorer [Wolff et al.,1999], and (3) the standard universal H/He ratio [Anders and Grevesse, 1988]. Based on these constraints, described in more detail in the next section, the best values for n p;lic and n H;LIC are 0.05 ± 0.015 cm 3 and 0.18 ±0:02 cm 3 respectively. The best value for the ionized interstellar He density, which also contributes to the dynamic pressure and thus affects the location of the TS, n He + ;LIC = 0.008 ± 0.002 cm 3. With these input parameters the mean location of the termination shock in the upwind direction (direction of relative motion) is ο96 AU from the Sun. 3. Determination of number densities of H atoms and protons in LIC Charge exchange processes in the heliospheric interface lead to a predictable reduction, or filtration, of interstellar atomic hydrogen that enters the heliosphere. The most accurate determination of the density of interstellar H atoms inside the heliosphere comes from measurements of pickup H +. Pickup ions are created from interstellar atoms inside the heliosphere by photoionization and charge exchange with the solar wind. An example of a typical proton velocity distribution is given in Figure 2. This spectrum was observed with SWICS on Ulysses in the slow solar wind at ο5 AU during quiet times at low latitudes.

IZMODENOV ET AL.: WHEN WILL VOYAGER 1 AND 2 CROSS THE TERMINATION SHOCK? 7 To model the pickup ion distribution (labeled 'pi' in the figure) we first compute the predicted phase-space density of pickup protons in the solar wind frame of reference at the location (R, ) of Ulysses (with R the heliocentric radial distance in AU and the angle between the direction of motion of the Sun relative to the interstellar cloud and the Sun-Ulysses line) using the "hot model" of Thomas [1978] for the spatial distribution of hydrogen atoms in the heliosphere and equations (9) and (10b) of Vasyliunas and Siscoe [1976] derived under the assumption of rapid pitch-angle scattering and hence isotropy the phase-space density of the resulting pickup protons. We then make the coordinate transformation to the spacecraft frame and finally integrate the model phase space density in the spacecraft frame over the view directions of SWICS. This predicts what the SWICS instrument would measure. Model parameters, in particular the neutral hydrogen density at the termination shock, are adjusted until the best fit to the measured spectrum is obtained. The assumption of isotropic pickup ion distributions is justified in this case because at 5 AU in the ecliptic plane the average magnetic field direction is nearly perpendicular to the solar wind flow direction. Heliospheric parameters affecting the model pickup ion distribution are well known from direct measurements. During the 2-year time period of Figure 2 the average photoionization rate for hydrogen, derived from Lyman alpha measurements on SOHO was 0.8 10 7 s 1 [D. R. McMullin and D. L. Judge, private communication]. The ionization rate from charge exchange, a product of solar wind flux (measured with SWICS) and charge exchange cross section [Maher

8 IZMODENOV ET AL.: WHEN WILL VOYAGER 1 AND 2 CROSS THE TERMINATION SHOCK? and Tinsley, 1977] was 5.4 10 7 s 1, giving a total loss rate of 6.2 10 7 s 1. The total production rate of pickup hydrogen is somewhat smaller (5.1 10 7 s 1 ) because the average solar wind flux for time periods of low thermal speed was measured to be lower than for the entire two year time period. With these values for the loss and production rates an excellent fit to the measured pickup proton distribution is obtained and the number density of atomic H at the termination shock is determined to be 0.100 ± 0.008 cm 3. The least known of the interstellar parameters are the LIC densities of atomic hydrogen and protons. We use (1) our measurements of the atomic H density at the TS (=0.100 ± 0.008 cm 3 ), (2) measurements of the LIC atomic He density (= 0.015 ± 0.002 cm 3 )[Gloeckler and Geiss, 2001; Witte, private communication], (3) the standard universal ratio of the total H to He (n p;lic +n H;LIC )/(n He + ;LIC +n He;LIC ) = 10, (4) measurements of local interstellar helium ionization rate of n He + ;LIC /(n He + ;LIC +n He;LIC ) = 0.35 ± 0.05 [Wolff et al., 1999]. Previously, similar methodology was used to determine interstellar H atom and proton number densities by Lallement [1996] and Gloeckler et al. [1997]. Here we use the latest measurements. With these constraints we find that the heliospheric interface model with n H;LIC = 0.18 ± 0.02 cm 3 and n p;lic = 0.05 ±0.015 cm 3 provides the best fit to SWICS Ulysses pickup hydrogen data. Interstellar hydrogen ionization fraction derived from our results is in agreement with recent calculations of the photoionization of interstellar matter within 5 pc of the Sun [Slavin and Frisch, 2002]. 4. Predictions of times of TS crossing by Voyagers 1 and 2 The location of the termination shock is not stationary because of solar-cycle-dependent variations of the solar wind parameters resulting in about a factor of 1.6 variation in the ram pressure. To estimate when the Voyagers will cross the termination shock we use results of the time-

IZMODENOV ET AL.: WHEN WILL VOYAGER 1 AND 2 CROSS THE TERMINATION SHOCK? 9 dependent version of the Baranov-Malama model of the heliospheric interface, which allows us to take into account effects of the solar cycle variations of the solar wind [Zaitsev and Izmodenov, 2001]. Five-point running averages of six-month averages of the solar wind speed and density measured by the MIT plasma analyzer on IMP 8 (at 1 AU) from 1973 to 2001, and an average alpha to proton number density ratio of 0.03 were used to derive solar cycle variations of the distance to the termination shock. For interstellar parameters we used n H;LIC = 0.18 ± 0.02 cm 3,n p;lic = 0.05 ± 0.015 cm 3 and n He + ;LIC = 0.008 ± 0.002 cm 3. Model calculations show that the termination shock reaches minimum heliocentric distance in a little more than two years after solar maximum. Using Ulysses/SWOOPS measurements of solar wind parameters during a 2-month period in 2002.8 when Ulysses was at +34 latitude, about the same as Voyager 1, places the predicted shock distance at 108 AU in 2004. We adjusted the solar-cycle curves (Figure 3) to that shock location in 2004. In the direction of travel of Voyager 1 the termination shock moves from its closest distance to the Sun, 99 AU, to the furthest distance, ο113 AU. The termination shock moves back and forth from its mean distance of 106 AU with amplitude of 7 AU. We note, however, that although we calculate the global heliospheric interface structure self-consistently, we neglect solar-cycle variation of filtration of interstellar atoms [Zaitsev and Izmodenov, 2000]. We do not expect that these variations will change our results significantly. Development of self-consistent models which can account for solar-cycle variations of filtration is currently in progress [Izmodenov and Malama, 2002]. In the direction of travel of Voyager 1, approximately 30 from the upwind direction, the most probable heliocentric distance of the termination shock is 102 AU in 2002 as shown in Figure 3. In August 2002, Voyager 1 was at ο86 AU. As the solar cycle goes from maximum to minimum, the termination shock starts to move away from the Sun at about the same speed as Voyager 1.

10 IZMODENOV ET AL.: WHEN WILL VOYAGER 1 AND 2 CROSS THE TERMINATION SHOCK? The termination shock reaches its furthest distance from the Sun in about 2006 before starting to move in again with the transition from solar minimum to solar maximum. From Figure 3, the most probable encounter of Voyager 1 with the termination shock will therefore be between 2007 and 2012. However, should solar maximum conditions of the present solar cycle persist a year longer than predicted, then there is about a 20 % chance that the encounter will take place in the next several years. The most probable encounter of the termination shock by Voyager 2 is estimated to be between 2011 and 2018. Our present axisymmetric model does not allow us to include any variations of solar wind speed and density with latitude. The TS location at Voyager 1, now ο30 degrees northward from the ecliptic, may be influenced by different solar wind conditions at that latitude. To take proper account of latitude-dependent effects would require a three-dimensional time-dependent MHD model, which we are currently developing. This 3D model is also needed to properly estimate effects of the interstellar magnetic field. In this study we assumed that the interstellar magnetic field is parallel to the interstellar flow. We believe that inclusion of these 3D effects would change our prediction only slightly. Finally, we only used average values of the solar wind alpha to proton abundance ratio, p/a, which varies from 0.02 at solar minimum to 0.045 at solar maximum [Aellig et al., 2001]. We estimate that for p/a = 0.02 the TS location moves inward by about 1 AU, while for p/a = 0.045 the shock moves outward by 2 AU. These variations are less than our error bars shown in Figure 3. 5. Summary In this paper we use our global heliospheric interface model to predict Voyager 1 and 2 crossings of the termination shock. To constrain the least known of the interstellar parameters the LIC

IZMODENOV ET AL.: WHEN WILL VOYAGER 1 AND 2 CROSS THE TERMINATION SHOCK? 11 densities of H (n H;LIC ) and protons (n p;lic ) in the LIC, we use (1) SWICS Ulysses measurement of pickup ions of H + and He + to determine the atomic H density at the termination shock, (2) measured ionization fractions of LIC He, and (3) the standard universal H/He abundance ratio. With these constraints we find n H;LIC = 0.18 ± 0.02 cm 3 and n p;lic = 0.05 ± 0.015 cm 3.In the direction of travel of Voyager 1 the termination shock location varies from 99 AU to ο113 AU. We find that the most probable encounter of Voyagers 1 and 2 with the termination shock will be between 2007 and 2012 and between 2011 and 2018 respectively. Acknowledgments. We thank D. R. McMullin and D. L. Judge for making the photoionization rates derived from SOHO measurements available to us, J. D. Richardson and A. J. Lazarus for their IMP 8 solar wind data, and D. J. McComas for the SWOOPS solar wind data. We thank the International Space Science Institute (ISSI) staff for their hospitality during our visit to ISSI where discussions leading to results of this publication were initiated. This work was supported in part by NASA/Caltech grant NAG5-6912, NASA/JPL contract 955460, the International Space Science Institute in Bern, INTAS grant 2001-0270, and RFBR grants 01-02-17551, 02-02-06011 and 01-01-00759. References Aellig, M.R., Lazarus, A.J., and Steinberg, J.T., The solar wind helium abundance: variation with wind speed and the solar cycle, in Solar and Galactic Composition, A joint SOHO/ACE Workshop, Ed. R.F. Wimmer-Schweingruber, AIP Conference Proceeding 598, 89-95, 2001. Anders, E., and Grevesse, N., Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 53, 1197, 1988. Alexashov, D. B., Baranov, V. B., Barsky, E. V., and Myasnikov, A. V, An Axisymmetric Magnetohydrodynamic Model for the Interaction of the Solar Wind with the Local Interstellar

12 IZMODENOV ET AL.: WHEN WILL VOYAGER 1 AND 2 CROSS THE TERMINATION SHOCK? Medium, Astronomy Letters 26, 743-749, 2000. Baranov, V. B., Malama, Y. G., Model of the solar wind interaction with the local interstellar medium - Numerical solution of self-consistent problem, J. Geophys. Res. 98, pp. 15,157-15,163, 1993. Chalov, S.V. and Fahr, H.J., The three-fluid structure of the particle modulated solar wind termination shock, Astron. Astrophys. 326, 860-869, 1997. Gloeckler, G., Fisk, L. A. Geiss J., Anomalously small magnetic field in the local interstellar cloud, Nature, 386, 374-377, 1997. Gloeckler, G., and Geiss, J., Joint SOHO/ACE workshop on Solar and Galactic Composition. Edited by Robert F. Wimmer-Schweingruber. Publisher: American Institute of Physics Conference proceedings vol. 598 location: Bern, Switzerland, March 6-9, 2001., p.281 Gloeckler, G., Geiss, J., Balsiger, H., et al., The Solar Wind Ion Composition Spectrometer, Astron. Astrophys.Suppl. Ser., 92, 267-289, 1992. Izmodenov, V. V., Geiss, J., Lallement, R., Gloeckler, G., Baranov, V. B., and Malama, Yu. G., Filtration of interstellar hydrogen in the two-shock heliospheric interface: inferences on the LIC electron density, J. Geophys. Res., 104, 4731-4741, 1999. Izmodenov, V. V., Malama, Y. G., Kalinin, A. P., et al., Hot neutral H in the heliosphere: elastic H-H, H-p collisions, Astrophys. Space Sci. 274, 1/2, 71-76, 2000. Izmodenov, V. V., Interstellar atoms in the heliospheric interface, in Proceedings of COSPAR Colloquium on The Outer Heliosphere: The Next Frontiers, Potsdam, Germany, 24-28 July 2000; Eds. K. Scherer, H. Fichtner, H.-J. Fahr, E. Marsch, 23-32, 2001. Izmodenov, V. V., and Malama, Yu. G., Variation of interstellar H atom filtration at the entrance to the heliosphere: the solar cycle effect, in preparation, 2002.

IZMODENOV ET AL.: WHEN WILL VOYAGER 1 AND 2 CROSS THE TERMINATION SHOCK? 13 Lallement, R., Relations Between ISM Inside and Outside the Heliosphere, Space Science Reviews, 78, 361-374 (1996). le Roux, J. A., and Fichtner, H., A self-consistent determination of the heliospheric termination shock structure in the presence of pickup, anomalous, and galactic cosmic ray protons, J. Geophys. Res. 102, 17365-17380, 1997. Maher, L. J., and Tinsley, B.A., Atomic hydrogen escape rate due to charge exchange with hot plasmaspheric ions, J. Geophys. Res. 82, 689-695, 1977. Myasnikov, A.V., Izmodenov, V.V., Alexashov, D. B., Chalov, S. V., Self-consistent model of the solar wind interaction with two-component circumsolar interstellar cloud, J. Geophys. Res., 105, 5179-5188, 2000. Slavin, J. D., and Frisch, P.C., The Ionization of Nearby Interstellar Gas, Astrophys. J., 565, 364-379, 2002. Thomas, G. E., The interstellar wind and its influence on the interplanetary environment, Ann. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. 6, 173, 1978. Stone, E.C., News from the Edge of interstellar space, Science 293, 55-56, 2001. Vasyliunas, V. M. and. Siscoe, G. L., On the flux and the energy spectrum of interstellar ions in the solar system, J. Geophys. Res. 81, 1,247-1,252, 1976. Witte, M., Banaszkiewicz, M., and Rosenbauer, H., Recent Results on the Parameters of the Interstellar Helium from the Ulysses/Gas Experiment, Space Science Reviews, 78, 289-296,1996. Wolff, B., Koester, D., and Lallement, R., Evidence for an ionization gradient in the local interstellar medium: EUVE observations of white dwarfs, Astron. Astrophys., 346, 969-978,1999. Zaitsev, N. A., and Izmodenov, V. V., Solar cycle heliospheric interface variations: influence of neutralized solar wind, Proceedings of COSPAR Colloquium on The Outer Heliosphere: The

14 IZMODENOV ET AL.: WHEN WILL VOYAGER 1 AND 2 CROSS THE TERMINATION SHOCK? Next Frontiers, Potsdam, 65-68, Pergamon (2001). Zank, G., Interaction of the solar wind with the local interstellar medium: a theoretical perspective, Space Science Reviews, 89, 413-688 (1999).

IZMODENOV ET AL.: WHEN WILL VOYAGER 1 AND 2 CROSS THE TERMINATION SHOCK? 15 400 Interstellar Medium Interstellar plasma Streamlines X (AU) 200 0 Trajectory of interacting interstellar H atom H Termination Shock -200 Bow Shock Solar wind Streamlines -400 Heliopause 400 200 0 Z (AU) -200-400 Figure 1. Structure of the heliospheric interface, the region of interaction of the solar wind with the Local Interstellar Cloud, based on results of numerical modeling. We used the following interstellar parameters: (a) atomic hydrogen number density (= 0.18 cm 3 ), (b) proton number density (= 0.05 cm 3 ), (c) gas temperature (= 6500 K), and (d) gas speed (relative to the Sun) (= 26.4 km/s), and solar wind parameters: (e) solar wind density (at 1 AU) (= 7.39 cm 3 ), and speed (= 432 km/s). Discussion of, and references for the chosen parameters are given in the text.

16 IZMODENOV ET AL.: WHEN WILL VOYAGER 1 AND 2 CROSS THE TERMINATION SHOCK? F(W) Phase Space Density (s 3 /km 6 ) 10 8 10 6 10 4 10 2 10 0 10-2 Figure 2. (pi) (sw) (st) SWICS Ulysses Solar Wind Protons Interstellar Pickup Hydrogen H + 1997.108-1999.108 Vth < 15 km/s Suprathermal Tail 0.7 1 2 3 4 W Proton Speed/Solar Wind Speed Two-year-averaged phase space density of H + versus normalized speed W (proton speed divided by solar wind speed) observed with the Solar Wind Ion Composition Spectrometer (SWICS) on Ulysses in the slow solar wind at ο5 AU and low latitude. Only quiet-time periods, characterized by a low solar wind thermal speed (< 15 km/s) were used in this average. Interstellar pickup hydrogen is the dominant component in the flat portion of the spectrum between W ο1.3 and ο2.2. Solar wind protons, modeled by curve (sw), dominate below W ο1.3 and accelerated protons form the suprathermal tail above W ο2.2, modeled by curve (st). During quiet time periods used here, the solar wind distribution is sufficiently narrow and the suprathermal tail sufficiently weak, to reveal more fully the pickup ion component of the spectrum. The curve labeled (pi) is computed using model parameters given in the text. The atomic hydrogen density at the termination shock is found to be 0.100 ± 0.008 cm 3.

IZMODENOV ET AL.: WHEN WILL VOYAGER 1 AND 2 CROSS THE TERMINATION SHOCK? 17 Distance of the Termination Shock from the Sun (AU) Probability 130 120 110 100 90 80 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 (a) (b) Voyager 1 distance Voyager 1 Voyager 2 distance Voyager 2 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 Time (Year) Figure 3. (a) Mean (bold curves) and 1-ff limits (light curves) of the termination shock heliocentric radial distance (in astronomic units) as a function of time at 30 from the upwind direction, calculated using the models described in the text. IMP 8 solar wind parameters were used for the time period between 1975 and 2001 (solid curves) to establish the solar-cycle dependence of the termination shock location. The distance-time curves were then repeated with a 20-year lag corresponding to the approximate period of the magnetic field reversal cycle of the Sun (dotted curves). Using Ulysses measurements of solar wind parameters during a 2-month period in 2002.8 when Ulysses was at +34 latitude, about the same as Voyager 1, places the predicted shock distance at 108 AU in 2004. We adjusted the solar-cycle curves to that shock location in 2004. The Voyager 1 and 2 distances from the Sun are indicated by the labeled lines. (b) Probability of termination shock crossing for Voyager 1 (solid curve) and Voyager 2 (dotted curve) as a function of time. The probability of shock encounter is calculated as a function of time t by integrating the gaussian probability distribution (with mean <R(t)> and ff(t) from the upper panel) from minus infinity to the radial distance from the Sun of Voyager 1 or 2 respectively. The most probable encounter of the termination shock by Voyager 1 is between 2007 and 2012, indicated by the shaded region.