Dynamic Earth Pressure Problems and Retaining Walls. Behavior of Retaining Walls During Earthquakes. Soil Dynamics week # 12

Similar documents
UNIT V. The active earth pressure occurs when the wall moves away from the earth and reduces pressure.

DESIGN AND DETAILING OF COUNTERFORT RETAINING WALL

two structural analysis (statics & mechanics) APPLIED ACHITECTURAL STRUCTURES: DR. ANNE NICHOLS SPRING 2017 lecture STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS AND SYSTEMS

UNIT-V MOMENT DISTRIBUTION METHOD

Chapter (3) Ultimate Bearing Capacity of Shallow Foundations

Sabah Shawkat Cabinet of Structural Engineering Walls carrying vertical loads should be designed as columns. Basically walls are designed in

FOUNDATION ENGINEERING UNIT V

Module 3. Analysis of Statically Indeterminate Structures by the Displacement Method

T1 T e c h n i c a l S e c t i o n

QUESTION BANK. SEMESTER: V SUBJECT CODE / Name: CE 6501 / STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS-I

Module 2. Analysis of Statically Indeterminate Structures by the Matrix Force Method

Reinforced Soil Structures Reinforced Soil Walls. Prof K. Rajagopal Department of Civil Engineering IIT Madras, Chennai

INTI COLLEGE MALAYSIA

ΙApostolos Konstantinidis Diaphragmatic behaviour. Volume B

Moment Distribution Method

1. Replace the given system of forces acting on a body as shown in figure 1 by a single force and couple acting at the point A.

D : SOLID MECHANICS. Q. 1 Q. 9 carry one mark each. Q.1 Find the force (in kn) in the member BH of the truss shown.

This equation of motion may be solved either by differential equation method or by graphical method as discussed below:

CHAPTER 5. T a = 0.03 (180) 0.75 = 1.47 sec 5.12 Steel moment frame. h n = = 260 ft. T a = (260) 0.80 = 2.39 sec. Question No.

Chapter (11) Pile Foundations

EXAMPLE OF PILED FOUNDATIONS

COEFFICIENT OF DYNAMIC HORIZONTAL SUBGRADE REACTION OF PILE FOUNDATIONS ON PROBLEMATIC GROUND IN HOKKAIDO Hirofumi Fukushima 1

Foundation Engineering Prof. Dr N.K. Samadhiya Department of Civil Engineering Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee

Verification Manual. of GEO5 Gravity Wall program. Written by: Ing. Veronika Vaněčková, Ph.D. Verze: 1.0-en Fine Ltd.

Seismic design of bridges

LATERAL EARTH PRESSURE

D : SOLID MECHANICS. Q. 1 Q. 9 carry one mark each.

Chapter (6) Geometric Design of Shallow Foundations

Simplified Base Isolation Design Procedure. Gordon Wray, P.E.

Codal Provisions IS 1893 (Part 1) 2002

2. a) Explain the equilibrium of i) Concurrent force system, and ii) General force system.

Structural Dynamics. Spring mass system. The spring force is given by and F(t) is the driving force. Start by applying Newton s second law (F=ma).

Where αh and αv are the horizontal and vertical pseudostatic k h, k v = coefficient of horizontal and vertical pseudostatic

By Dr. Mohammed Ramidh

Module 4 : Deflection of Structures Lecture 4 : Strain Energy Method


Chapter 12: Lateral Earth Pressure

Name: Fall 2014 CLOSED BOOK

Module 2. Analysis of Statically Indeterminate Structures by the Matrix Force Method

MODULE 3 ANALYSIS OF STATICALLY INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES BY THE DISPLACEMENT METHOD

OUTCOME 1 - TUTORIAL 3 BENDING MOMENTS. You should judge your progress by completing the self assessment exercises. CONTENTS

B.Tech. Civil (Construction Management) / B.Tech. Civil (Water Resources Engineering)

7.6 Journal Bearings

E 490 FE Exam Prep. Engineering Mechanics

Objectives. In this section you will learn the following. Rankine s theory. Coulomb s theory. Method of horizontal slices given by Wang (2000)

Prof. Dr.-Ing. Martin Achmus Institute of Soil Mechanics, Foundation Engineering and Waterpower Engineering. Monopile design

Structural Analysis III Moment Distribution

Analysis of the horizontal bearing capacity of a single pile

UNIT II SHALLOW FOUNDATION

FLOW CHART FOR DESIGN OF BEAMS

two structural analysis (statics & mechanics) Structural Requirements Structure Requirements Structure Requirements serviceability efficiency

Engineering Mechanics

EARTH PRESSURES ON RETAINING STRUCTURES

Sub. Code:

SECTION A. 8 kn/m. C 3 m 3m

Introduction to structural dynamics

Design Procedures For Dynamically Loaded Foundations

AB Engineering Manual

SN QUESTION YEAR MARK 1. State and prove the relationship between shearing stress and rate of change of bending moment at a section in a loaded beam.

IDE 110 Mechanics of Materials Spring 2006 Final Examination FOR GRADING ONLY

Entrance exam Master Course

DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF PILES IN SAND BASED ON SOIL-PILE INTERACTION

Technical Note 16 Equivalent Static Method

P.E. Civil Exam Review:

Chapter 2: Rigid Bar Supported by Two Buckled Struts under Axial, Harmonic, Displacement Excitation..14

Passive Force on Retaining Wall Supporting Φ Backfill Considering Curvilinear Rupture Surface

RAMWALL DESIGN METHODOLOGY

Module 6. Approximate Methods for Indeterminate Structural Analysis. Version 2 CE IIT, Kharagpur

five Mechanics of Materials 1 ARCHITECTURAL STRUCTURES: FORM, BEHAVIOR, AND DESIGN DR. ANNE NICHOLS SUMMER 2017 lecture

ENG1001 Engineering Design 1

UNIT IV FLEXIBILTY AND STIFFNESS METHOD

CE 2302 STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS I UNIT-I DEFLECTION OF DETERMINATE STRUCTURES

UNIT II 1. Sketch qualitatively the influence line for shear at D for the beam [M/J-15]

Deep Foundations 2. Load Capacity of a Single Pile

Chapter (7) Lateral Earth Pressure

MECHANISM OF EARTH PRESSURE AND SIDEWALL FRICTION ACTING ON AN EMBEDDED FOOTING IN DRY SAND BASED ON CENTRIFUGE TESTING

Engineering Mechanics Department of Mechanical Engineering Dr. G. Saravana Kumar Indian Institute of Technology, Guwahati

Rigid and Braced Frames

Structural Analysis III Moment Distribution

Seismic Analysis of Retaining Structures. Nanjundaswamy P. Department of Civil Engineering S J College of Engineering, Mysore

Dynamic Soil Pressures on Embedded Retaining Walls: Predictive Capacity Under Varying Loading Frequencies

Associate Professor. Tel:

QUESTION BANK SEMESTER: III SUBJECT NAME: MECHANICS OF SOLIDS

Problem " Â F y = 0. ) R A + 2R B + R C = 200 kn ) 2R A + 2R B = 200 kn [using symmetry R A = R C ] ) R A + R B = 100 kn

ME 323 Examination #2 April 11, 2018

Verification of a Micropile Foundation

KNIFE EDGE FLAT ROLLER

QUESTION BANK DEPARTMENT: CIVIL SEMESTER: III SUBJECT CODE: CE2201 SUBJECT NAME: MECHANICS OF SOLIDS UNIT 1- STRESS AND STRAIN PART A

MAHALAKSHMI ENGINEERING COLLEGE

Author(s) Sawamura, Yasuo; Kishida, Kiyoshi;

Rigid pavement design

Shear force and bending moment of beams 2.1 Beams 2.2 Classification of beams 1. Cantilever Beam Built-in encastre' Cantilever

BEAM A horizontal or inclined structural member that is designed to resist forces acting to its axis is called a beam

[5] Stress and Strain


Dept of ECE, SCMS Cochin

Response Modification of Urban Infrastructure. 7 Chapter 7 Rocking Isolation of Foundations. Kazuhiko Kawashima Tokyo Institute of Technology

SOLUTION (17.3) Known: A simply supported steel shaft is connected to an electric motor with a flexible coupling.

Chapter 5 CENTRIC TENSION OR COMPRESSION ( AXIAL LOADING )

Statics Chapter II Fall 2018 Exercises Corresponding to Sections 2.1, 2.2, and 2.3

Transcription:

Dynamic Earth Pressure Problems and Retaining Walls 1/15 Behavior of Retaining Walls During Earthquakes - Permanent displacement = cc ' 2 2 due to one cycle of ground motion

2/15 Hence, questions are : 1 What is the change in earth pressure? 2 Where is its point of application? 3 How much displacement of the wall occurs? (What is the permissible displacement?) Modification of Coulomb`s Theory - Inertia forces on the trial wedge in horizontal and vertical directions = Wa g and Wa 1 / g respectively 1 h / v ( a : horizontal acceleration, a : vertical acceleration) h v - During the worst conditions for wall stability Wa g acts toward the wall, 1 h / Wa 1 v / g acts downward (or upward)

3/15 - a g h α h =, av α v = g horizontal, vertical seismic coefficients - The forces acting on the wedge abc 1 : Weight of the wedge abc 1, W 1, acting at its CG. Earth pressure P 1 inclined at an angle δ to normal to the wall Soil reaction R 1 inclined at an angle φ to normal to the face bc1 Horizontal inertia force Wα 1 h Vertical inertia force Wα 1 v - Constant force polygon to obtain P ( ) 1 = P = P +Δ P total a d - The maximum value of P total is determined by considering other trial surfaces - Analytically, Ptotal 2 2 cos ( φ ψ α)(1 ± αv) = γ H 2 1 1 1 2 cosψ cos αcos( δ + α + ψ) sin( φ+ δ)sin( φ i ψ) 2 {1 + [ ] } cos( α i) cos( δ + α + ψ) 2

Modified Culmann`s construction 4/15 - bs at an angle φ ψ with the horizontal line - bl = bl - use W ( W (1 ) 1α + W1 + α ) h v Point of Application of the total ( P ) a dyn - at midheight of the wall - at the upper third point of the wall Displacement analysis - no information on permissible displacement of retaining wall 1. Draw a dimensional sketch 2. Draw a line bs ' and bl (= bl ') 3. Intercept bd1, equal to the wt. of wedge abc 1, to a convenient scale along 4. Draw a line de 1 1 parallel to bl ( = bl ' ) 5. Trace a Culmann s line 6. Draw a line parallel to bs ' and tangential to the Culmann`s line. 7. Find de P a obtained bs '

5/15 Earthquake Loads on Footings (Pseudostatic method) Effect of moment only - Eccentricity M e = Q v Qv M : moment( = a l ) g Q v : central vertical static load due to the shaking of structure i.e., horizontal acceleration force (lumped mass at CG) B - For e < 6 Q e qmax = (1+ 6 ) A B B - For e > 6 Q 4B qmax = ( ) A 3B 6e - Effective width, B ' = B 2e Effect of trust only - Inclination Pp + F Pa FS = Q H F : Frictional Resistance 1 2 - Pa = kaγ h 2 1 2 - Pp = kpγ H, take ( 1 ~ 1 2 2 3 ) of Pp

At the present state of practice for earthquake loading 6/15 - Bearing capacity & settlement may be calculated by the pseudostatic method - Interconnecting beams (Tie beams) be provided to tie the foundations. It should be capable of carrying, in tension or compression, a force equal to A a /4of the largest footing or column load ( A a =effective peak acceleration). ATC(1978) Tie beams - transmits the unbalanced shear and moment - reduces the differential settlement - PC pile no use(depends on the building class & earthquake intensity)

Dynamic Analysis for Pile Foundations 7/15 - Evaluate the free-vibration characteristics of pile-soil system Calculate the spectral displacement ( y g ) Maximum bending moment ( M ) Computation of soil reaction ( Px ( ) ) max - Preliminaries - Soil properties are known ( kn, h...) - Pile characteristics are known (size, EI, length, type) - Lateral load-deflection of the pile under static conditions - nondimensional frequency factor ( F SL1 ) (based on parametric study) (k varies linearly with depth) F = w W SL1 n1 2 g nh T T =, 5 EI n h w n1 : the first natural angular frequency (rad/sec) W / g : the lumped mass at the pile top k : the soil modulus T : the relative stiffness factor

Soil Dynamics week # 12 8/15 - the depth coefficient(z) Z= z (if Z max < 2, rigid body / if Z max > 5, long pile) T - the max. depth coefficient ( Z max ) Z max = D T

Soil Dynamics week # 12 9/15 - max. bending moment coefficients (Fig 7.24)

Soil Dynamics week # 12 10/15 Step-by-step procedures ① Estimate the dynamic soil modulus k (or nh ) (modified value from a static lateral load test based on the engineering judgement) ② Compute the relative stiffness factor, T ③ Calculate the maximum depth factor Z max for a pile ; ( Z max should be > 5) ④ Read the frequency factor FSL1 for the Z max and the pile end condition from Fig 7.22

Soil Dynamics week # 12 11/15 ⑤ Estimate the dead load on the pile top mt = W / g ⑥ Determine the natural frequency wn1 wn1 = FSL1 W gnht 2 ⑦ Compute the time period Tn1 = 2π / wn1 ⑧ From Fig 7.25 determine the spectral displacement S d for assumed damping (for pile-soil system 5% damping may be assumed) maximum displacement of the pile head

9 Estimate the maximum bending moment in the pile section 12/15 M = B n T S (From table 7.7) 3 max me1 h d Pile section needs to be checked against this moment 10 Compute the soil reaction Pz = nh z yz(displacement of the pile at z) (refer to table 7.8 & Example 7.3) Compare this with the allowable Soil reaction : 1+ sinφ P = γ b z ( kg / cm 1 sinφ a ) = K σ b p v

Soil Dynamics week # 12 13/15

Soil Dynamics week # 12 14/15

15/15 11 Check on Design 1. Estimate the fixity of the pile head. In the absence of a realistic estimate, 50 percent fixity may be assumed. 2. Compute displacement. For 50 percent fixity, the displacement under seismic loading condition is 2.0 + 1.0 = 1.5cm. For any other fixity of the pile head, linear 2 interpolation may be made. 3. Compute the maximum bending moment as for displacements Mmax = 1213 t cm( ) 4. The soil reaction needs to be interpolated at each point and a new diagram obtained