Definitions. Seismic Risk, R (Σεισμική διακινδύνευση) = risk of damage of a structure

Similar documents
AN OVERVIEW AND GUIDELINES FOR PROBABILISTIC SEISMIC HAZARD MAPPING

5. Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analysis

log 4 0.7m log m Seismic Analysis of Structures by TK Dutta, Civil Department, IIT Delhi, New Delhi. Module 1 Seismology Exercise Problems :

Comment on Why Do Modern Probabilistic Seismic-Hazard Analyses Often Lead to Increased Hazard Estimates? by Julian J. Bommer and Norman A.

Seismic Hazard & Risk Assessment

Seismic hazard modeling for Bulgaria D. Solakov, S. Simeonova

THE ROLE OF EPSILON FOR THE IDENTIFICATION OF GROUPS OF EARTHQUAKE INPUTS OF GIVEN HAZARD

PROBABILITY-BASED DESIGN EARTHQUAKE LOAD CONSIDERING ACTIVE FAULT

CHARACTERIZING SPATIAL CROSS-CORRELATION BETWEEN GROUND- MOTION SPECTRAL ACCELERATIONS AT MULTIPLE PERIODS. Nirmal Jayaram 1 and Jack W.

Codal provisions of seismic hazard in Northeast India

Uniform Hazard Spectrum(UHS) for performance based seismic design

PROBABILISTIC SEISMIC HAZARD MAPS AT GROUND SURFACE IN JAPAN BASED ON SITE EFFECTS ESTIMATED FROM OBSERVED STRONG-MOTION RECORDS

Probabilistic Earthquake Risk Assessment of Newcastle and Lake Macquarie Part 1 Seismic Hazard.

Effects of earthquake source geometry and site conditions on spatial correlation of earthquake ground motion hazard

Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Maps in Dam Foundation

SEISMIC HAZARD ANALYSIS. Instructional Material Complementing FEMA 451, Design Examples Seismic Hazard Analysis 5a - 1

Development of U. S. National Seismic Hazard Maps and Implementation in the International Building Code

Seismic Analysis of Structures Prof. T.K. Datta Department of Civil Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Delhi. Lecture 03 Seismology (Contd.

Probabilistic Performance-Based Optimum Seismic Design of (Bridge) Structures

Occurrence of negative epsilon in seismic hazard analysis deaggregation, and its impact on target spectra computation

Performance based Engineering

Overview of Seismic PHSA Approaches with Emphasis on the Management of Uncertainties

Seismic Performance Assessment Uses Incremental Dynamic Analysis

PSHA results for the BSHAP region

PROBABILISTIC LIQUEFACTION HAZARD ANALYSIS IN JAPAN

Japan Seismic Hazard Information Station

I N T R O D U C T I O N T O P R O B A B I L I S T I C S E I S M I C H A Z A R D A N A LY S I S

Development of Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analysis for International Sites, Challenges and Guidelines

DEVELOPMENT OF DESIGN RESPONSE SPECTRAL SHAPES FOR CENTRAL AND EASTERN U.S. (CEUS) AND WESTERN U.S. (WUS) ROCK SITE CONDITIONS*

International Journal of Advance Engineering and Research Development. Development of Site Specific Seismic Inputs for Structures

Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analysis of Nepal considering Uniform Density Model

Special edition paper Development of Shinkansen Earthquake Impact Assessment System

Development of Ground Motion Time Histories for Seismic Design

VALIDATION AGAINST NGA EMPIRICAL MODEL OF SIMULATED MOTIONS FOR M7.8 RUPTURE OF SAN ANDREAS FAULT

Preliminary test of the EEPAS long term earthquake forecast model in Australia

I N T R O D U C T I O N T O P R O B A B I L I S T I C S E I S M I C H A Z A R D A N A LY S I S

EARTHQUAKE MODELLING. Algiers, Belhassen Tonat

(Seismological Research Letters, July/August 2005, Vol.76 (4): )

Deaggregation of the Regional Seismic Hazard: City of Patras, Greece.

Spatial Correlation of Ground Motions in Seismic Hazard Assessment

Shaking Hazard Compatible Methodology for Probabilistic Assessment of Fault Displacement Hazard

EPPO-ITSAK : Institute of Engineering Seismology & Earthquake Engineering, Thessaloniki, GREECE

Scenario Earthquakes for Korean Nuclear Power Plant Site Considering Active Faults

Investigation of Seismic Hazard in NW-Himalayas, Pakistan using Gumbel s First Asymptotic Distribution of Extreme Values

Assessment and Mitigation of Ground Motion Hazards from Induced Seismicity. Gail M. Atkinson

THE RESPONSE SPECTRUM

Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering

PEAK GROUND HORIZONTAL ACCELERATION ATTENUATION RELATIONSHIP FOR LOW MAGNITUDES AT SHORT DISTANCES IN SOUTH INDIAN REGION

Usability of the Next Generation Attenuation Equations for Seismic Hazard Assessment in Malaysia

An Introduction to Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analysis (PSHA) Jack W. Baker

THESSALONIKI SEISMIC HAZARD ASSESSMENT: PROBABILISTIC AND DETERMINISTIC APPROACH FOR ROCK SITE CONDITIONS

log (N) 2.9<M< <M< <M< <M<4.9 tot in bin [N] = Mid Point M log (N) =

Site specific seismic hazard assessment a case study of Guanyin offshore wind farm 場址特定地震危害度評估 - 以觀音離岸風力發電廠為例

SCENARIO EARTHQUAKE FOR SPATIALLY DISTRIBUTED STRUCTURES

WP2: Framework for Seismic Hazard Analysis of Spatially Distributed Systems

Understanding Seismic Hazard Needs for Infrastructure Risk Analysis: Lessons from SYNER-G

Epistemic Uncertainty in Seismic Hazard Analysis for Australia

Professor Terje Haukaas University of British Columbia, Vancouver terje.civil.ubc.ca. Earthquakes

An earthquake is the result of a sudden displacement across a fault that releases stresses that have accumulated in the crust of the earth.

Accelerograms for building design for hard soil in Mexico City

Incorporating simulated Hikurangi subduction interface spectra into probabilistic hazard calculations for Wellington

Assessment of Seismic Design Motions in Areas of Low Seismicity: Comparing Australia and New Zealand

Ground Motion Studies for Critical Sites in North-West Bangladesh

Characterization and modelling of seismic action

Bayesian tsunami fragility modeling considering input data uncertainty

Scientific Programme. 1. Opening Day

Estimation of Gutenberg-Richter seismicity parameters for the Bundaberg region using piecewise extended Gumbel analysis

I. INTRODUCTION II. EARTHQUAKES

Relevance Vector Machines for Earthquake Response Spectra

Disaggregation of seismic drift hazard

Naturgefahren Erdbebenrisiko. Seismische Gefährdungsanalyse. Evaluation of earthquake hazard

Earthquakes. Forces Within Eartth. Faults form when the forces acting on rock exceed the rock s strength.

Italian Map of Design Earthquakes from Multimodal Disaggregation Distributions: Preliminary Results.

RESPONSE SPECTRA RECOMMENDED FOR AUSTRALIA

Chapter 2 Strong Motion and Estimation of Seismic Hazard

Introducing a New Approach for Modelling the Near Field Effects in Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analysis

Uncertainties in a probabilistic model for seismic hazard analysis in Japan

3D Seismic Hazard and Risk Maps for Earthquake Awareness of Citizens with Aids of GIS and Remote Sensing Technologies

Natural Hazards Mitigation in Iceland

A probabilistic approach for landslide hazard analysis

Spatial variation of maximum considered and design basis earthquakes in peninsular India

Deterministic Seismic Hazard Assessment of Quetta, Pakistan

OPTIMIZATION OF RESPONSE SIMULATION FOR LOSS ESTIMATION USING PEER S METHODOLOGY

Quantifying the effect of declustering on probabilistic seismic hazard

2 Approaches To Developing Design Ground Motions

Seismic Vulnerability Assessment of Wood-frame Buildings in Southwestern British Columbia

THE ECAT SOFTWARE PACKAGE TO ANALYZE EARTHQUAKE CATALOGUES

Probabilistic Performance-Based Optimum Seismic Design of (Bridge) Structures

Module 7 SEISMIC HAZARD ANALYSIS (Lectures 33 to 36)

CONSIDERATION OF EARTHQUAKES IN THE DESIGN OF THE MACAU TOWER

PROTECTING MONUMENTS AND HISTORICAL SETTINGS FROM THE NEXT EARTHQUAKE

Commentary Appendix A DEVELOPMENT OF MAXIMUM CONSIDERED EARTHQUAKE GROUND MOTION MAPS FIGURES THROUGH

Modifications to Risk-Targeted Seismic Design Maps for Subduction and Near-Fault Hazards

Current Seismic Hazard Assessment and Creation of Early Warning System in the Republic of Armenia

SEISMIC RISK ANALYSIS OF L AQUILA GAS DISTRIBUTION NETWORK Paper ID. 2999

Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analysis in Thailand and Adjacent Areas by Using Regional Seismic Source Zones

A METHODOLOGY FOR ASSESSING EARTHQUAKE-INDUCED LANDSLIDE RISK. Agency for the Environmental Protection, ITALY (

CHAPTER 3 METHODOLOGY

EARTHQUAKE HAZARD ASSESSMENT IN KAZAKHSTAN

CALIBRATED RESPONSE SPECTRA FOR COLLAPSE ASSESSMENT UNDER MULTIVARIATE HAZARD AND STRUCTURAL RESPONSE UNCERTAINTIES

Transcription:

SEISMIC HAZARD

Definitions Seismic Risk, R (Σεισμική διακινδύνευση) = risk of damage of a structure Seismic Hazard, Η (Σεισμικός κίνδυνος) = expected intensity of ground motion at a site Vulnerability, V (Τρωτότητα) = vulnerability of a structure depending on its resistance R = H V

METHODOLOGY 1. Identification of seismic sources around the site under examination. 2. Determination of number and magnitude of earthquake events for each seismic source according to historic data 3. Determination of an attenuation model in order to calculate ground motion parameters for given magnitude and distance from the site of a particular earthquake 4. Determination of the stochastic model for the appearance of earthquake events. Usually the Poisson distribution is considered. 5. Evaluation of seismic hazard curve associating a particular ground motion parameter (i.e. peak ground acceleration) with an annual frequency of exceedence or a probability of exceedence in a given time period.

METHODOLOGY 1. Identification of seismic sources around the site under examination. 2. Determination of number and magnitude of earthquake events for each seismic source according to historic data 3. Determination of an attenuation model in order to calculate ground motion parameters for given magnitude and distance from the site of a particular earthquake 4. Determination of the stochastic model for the appearance of earthquake events. Usually the Poisson distribution is considered. 5. Evaluation of seismic hazard curve associating a particular ground motion parameter (i.e. peak ground acceleration) with an annual frequency of exceedence or a probability of exceedence in a given time period.

The determination of the number and magnitude of earthquake events for a particular seismic source is performed through a Guttenberg-Richter relationship with the following form: where: log 10 N = a b M N = the number of earthquakes with magnitude larger than M during a time period T. a = a constant that measures the total number of earthquakes at the given source b = a measure of the number of small versus large events. The number of events N can be divided by the T years in order to get the annual frequency of exceeding the M event magnitude: N 1 (M) = N(M) / T Furthermore, N 1 can be divided by the source area A (or length L) in order to define the annual frequency of exceedence per unit source area: N 2 (M) = N 1 M) / A

Effect of faults that produce large earthquakes Faults tend to produce essentially the same size or characteristic earthquakes having a relative narrow range of magnitudes near the maximum. Large earthquakes on the fault are more probable than indicated by the G-R relationship

For each seismic source a table is constructed, where the columns represent different event magnitudes and the lines different distances from the examined site. At a bin of magnitude M i and distance R j is given the annual frequency of having an earthquake in the range of magnitude M i, (Μ i -dm/2 < M < M i +dm/2) and distance R j (R j -dr/2 < R < R j +dr/2). This annual frequency is calculated from: N 1,ij = [ N 1 (Μ i -dm/2) - N 1 (M i +dm/2) ]da where da is at the portion of the source area between R j -dr/2 and R j +dr/2. R min Μ min Μ i Μ max Different tables are obtained for each source and finally a global table is constituted by adding the values in the corresponding bins of the particular tables. R j N 1,ij R max

METHODOLOGY 1. Identification of seismic sources around the site under examination. 2. Determination of number and magnitude of earthquake events for each seismic source according to historic data 3. Determination of an attenuation model in order to calculate ground motion parameters for given magnitude and distance from the site of a particular earthquake 4. Determination of the stochastic model for the appearance of earthquake events. Usually the Poisson distribution is considered. 5. Evaluation of seismic hazard curve associating a particular ground motion parameter (i.e. peak ground acceleration) with an annual frequency of exceedence or a probability of exceedence in a given time period.

Another table is created by giving in each (M i, R j ) bin the ground motion value obtained from a corresponding attenuation relationship. Such relationships are those given for peak ground acceleration and spectral accelerations by Boore and Atkinson. A similar but simpler relationship is the one given by Papazachos, in the form: lna g = 3.88 + 1.12 M s 1.65 ln(r+15) where a g = peak ground acceleration in cm/sec 2 R = distance from the source in km s ij s k If we consider as s ij the values of the chosen ground motion parameter for the M i, R j pair we can define a region of bins at which the s ij values are larger or equal to a target value s k. R min Μ min Μ i Μ max R j s ij The addition of the corresponding N 1,ij values from the first table gives the annual frequency of exceedence N 1,k for the target value s k. R max

METHODOLOGY 1. Identification of seismic sources around the site under examination. 2. Determination of number and magnitude of earthquake events for each seismic source according to historic data 3. Determination of an attenuation model in order to calculate ground motion parameters for given magnitude and distance from the site of a particular earthquake 4. Determination of the stochastic model for the appearance of earthquake events. Usually the Poisson distribution is considered. 5. Evaluation of seismic hazard curve associating a particular ground motion parameter (i.e. peak ground acceleration) with an annual frequency of exceedence or a probability of exceedence in a given time period.

Considering that the appearance of earthquake events follows the Poisson distribution, the probability of exceeding s k in t years is given by the relationship: p(t) = 1 exp( N 1,k t) Accordingly, for different s k values a hazard curve can be obtained with the s k value on the vertical axis and on the horizontal either the probability of exceedence of s k or the return period of events larger than s k which is the inverse of N 1,k. s s d sσχ T R t ln( 1 p) p t T R TE, σχ TE T (έτη) R (years) 10 100 1000 10000 100000

DEAGGREGATION Determine earthquake parameters, principally magnitude and distance, to consider in seismic-resistant design Choose the most likely magnitude distance pair

Example A seismic hazard analysis showed that: The site is affected by earthquakes that happen within a region of radius R = 80 km from the site. The probability of occurrence of a seismic event is the same at every point in this region. The G-R relation for the earthquakes that have occurred in a period T = 120 years in this region is: logn = 6.55 0.85 M (Ν = number of earthquakes Μ) 1. Every how many years (in the average) an earthquake happens with Μ 6.5. Answer logn = 6.55 0.85 M Annual rate: Ν 1 = Ν/T = N/120 logn 1 = logn log120 logn 1 = 6.55 0.85 M 2.079 logn 1 = 4.471 0.85 M For Μ = 6.5 logn 1 (M 6.5) = 4.471 0.85 6.5 = 1.054 N 1 (M 6.5) = 10 1.054 = 0.0883 Return period: Τ R (Μ 6.5) = 1/Ν 1 = 11.3 years.

Example (cont.) 2. Calculate the probability of occurrence of at least one earthquake of magnitude Μ 7.5 in the next 100 years. Answer p(t) = 1 e N1 t For Μ = 7.5, t = 100: logn 1 (M 7.5) = 4.471 0.85 7.5 = 1.904 N 1 (M 7.5) = 10 1.904 = 0.0125 p(t=100) = 1 e 0.0125 100 = 0.713 = 71.3% 3. Calculate the probability of occurrence of at least one earthquake of magnitude Μ 6.0 in the next 50 years and in a distance less than 20 km from the site. Answer logn 1 (M 6.0) = 4.471 0.85 6.0 = 0.629 N 1 (M 6.0) = 10 0.629 = 0.235 A 1 = π 20 2, Α = π 80 2 Ν 1 (Α 1 ) = Ν 1 (Α) (Α 1 /Α) = 0.235 20 2 /80 2 = 0.01469 p(t=50) = 1 e 0.01469 50 = 0.520 = 52.0%

EXERCISE 10 SOURCE AREA WITH A RADIUS OF 200 km GUTTENBERG RICHTER RELATIONSHIP log N = 7.1 M GRID 2 2 km CALCULATE PROBABILITY OF EXCEEDENCE OF 0.50 g AT 50 YEAR PERIOD

Consider as attenuation relationship the one given by Papazachos: lna g = 3.88 + 1.12 M s 1.65 ln(r+15) Define the area that must be taken into account Evaluate the seismicity of each square of the grid from the Guttenberg Richter relationship: logn = 7.1 - M Define for each of the selected squares the minimum magnitude that produces a 0.50 g acceleration at the examined site. Evaluate the annual frequency of exceedence of the referred minimum magnitude for each square. Calculate the annual frequency of exceedence of 0.50 g at the examined site. Calculate the probability of exceedence in a 50 year period of the 0.50 g ground acceleration.

EXERCISE 11 SOURCE AREA WITH RADIUS 40 km PRODUCES A CHARACTERISTIC EARTHQUAKE OF MAGNITUDE 6.0 WITH A RETURN PERIOD OF 10 YEARS. LINE SOURCE WITH A LENGTH OF 40 km PRODUCES A CHARACTERISTIC EARTHQUAKE OF MAGNITUDE 7.5 WITH A RETURN PERIOD OF 100 YEARS. CALCULATE PROBABILITY OF EXCEEDENCE OF 0.25 g AND 0.50 g AT 50 YEAR PERIOD.

Define for each source the portion of its area or length that produces the target acceleration at the examined site as a result of the characteristic earthquake. Define the annual frequency of appearance of the characteristic earthquake at the defined portions. Calculate the annual frequency of exceedence of the target acceleration at the examined site. Calculate the probability of exceedence of the target acceleration in a 50 year period.