Symplectic Geometry versus Riemannian Geometry

Similar documents
Symplectic and Poisson Manifolds

Convex Symplectic Manifolds

Tesi di Laurea Magistrale in Matematica presentata da. Claudia Dennetta. Symplectic Geometry. Il Relatore. Prof. Massimiliano Pontecorvo

SOME HIGHLIGHTS OF SYMPLECTIC GEOMETRY, SUMMER SCHOOL UTRECHT, GEOMETRY, AUGUST 16, 2017

The topology of symplectic four-manifolds

LIE ALGEBROIDS AND POISSON GEOMETRY, OLIVETTI SEMINAR NOTES

Lecture I: Overview and motivation

Exercises in Geometry II University of Bonn, Summer semester 2015 Professor: Prof. Christian Blohmann Assistant: Saskia Voss Sheet 1

Poisson geometry of b-manifolds. Eva Miranda

Hamiltonian flows, cotangent lifts, and momentum maps

A little taste of symplectic geometry

BRST 2006 (jmf) 7. g X (M) X ξ X. X η = [ξ X,η]. (X θ)(η) := X θ(η) θ(x η) = ξ X θ(η) θ([ξ X,η]).

Eva Miranda. UPC-Barcelona. (joint with Victor Guillemin and Ana Rita Pires) Zaragoza, February

UNCERTAINTY PRINCIPLE, NON-SQUEEZING THEOREM AND THE SYMPLECTIC RIGIDITY LECTURE FOR THE 1995 DAEWOO WORKSHOP, CHUNGWON, KOREA

1.2. Examples of symplectic manifolds 1. (R 2n, ω 0 = n

COMPUTING THE POISSON COHOMOLOGY OF A B-POISSON MANIFOLD

Dierential geometry for Physicists

Embedded contact homology and its applications

Many of the exercises are taken from the books referred at the end of the document.

CALCULUS ON MANIFOLDS. 1. Riemannian manifolds Recall that for any smooth manifold M, dim M = n, the union T M =

SYMPLECTIC CAPACITY AND CONVEXITY

A 2-COCYCLE ON A GROUP OF SYMPLECTOMORPHISMS

GEOMETRIC QUANTIZATION

Reeb dynamics in dimension 3

SYMPLECTIC MANIFOLDS, GEOMETRIC QUANTIZATION, AND UNITARY REPRESENTATIONS OF LIE GROUPS. 1. Introduction

fy (X(g)) Y (f)x(g) gy (X(f)) Y (g)x(f)) = fx(y (g)) + gx(y (f)) fy (X(g)) gy (X(f))

Applications of embedded contact homology

Differential Geometry qualifying exam 562 January 2019 Show all your work for full credit

(g 1, g 2 ) g 1 g 2. i : G G

Exercise 1 (Formula for connection 1-forms) Using the first structure equation, show that

LECTURE 16: LIE GROUPS AND THEIR LIE ALGEBRAS. 1. Lie groups

14 Higher order forms; divergence theorem

Introduction to Index Theory. Elmar Schrohe Institut für Analysis

PREQUANTIZATION OF SYMPLECTIC SUPERMANIFOLDS

Contact pairs (bicontact manifolds)

Math 426H (Differential Geometry) Final Exam April 24, 2006.

Vortex Equations on Riemannian Surfaces

An Introduction to Symplectic Geometry

Math 868 Final Exam. Part 1. Complete 5 of the following 7 sentences to make a precise definition (5 points each). Y (φ t ) Y lim

The Poisson Embedding Problem

B 1 = {B(x, r) x = (x 1, x 2 ) H, 0 < r < x 2 }. (a) Show that B = B 1 B 2 is a basis for a topology on X.

BACKGROUND IN SYMPLECTIC GEOMETRY

Deformations of coisotropic submanifolds in symplectic geometry

Chap. 1. Some Differential Geometric Tools

Lecture III: Neighbourhoods

Calderón-Zygmund inequality on noncompact Riem. manifolds

Two simple ideas from calculus applied to Riemannian geometry

COTANGENT MODELS FOR INTEGRABLE SYSTEMS

LECTURE 1: LINEAR SYMPLECTIC GEOMETRY

Twisted Poisson manifolds and their almost symplectically complete isotropic realizations

A LITTLE TASTE OF SYMPLECTIC GEOMETRY: THE SCHUR-HORN THEOREM CONTENTS

Euler Characteristic of Two-Dimensional Manifolds

CHARACTERISTIC CLASSES

Notes for Math 535 Differential Geometry Spring Francis Bonahon. Department of Mathematics, University of Southern California

THE NEWLANDER-NIRENBERG THEOREM. GL. The frame bundle F GL is given by x M Fx

Relation of the covariant and Lie derivatives and its application to Hydrodynamics

4-MANIFOLDS: CLASSIFICATION AND EXAMPLES. 1. Outline

MATRIX LIE GROUPS AND LIE GROUPS

A MARSDEN WEINSTEIN REDUCTION THEOREM FOR PRESYMPLECTIC MANIFOLDS

EXERCISES IN POISSON GEOMETRY

Lie 2-algebras from 2-plectic geometry

Lie algebra cohomology

Invariant Nonholonomic Riemannian Structures on Three-Dimensional Lie Groups

LECTURE 9: MOVING FRAMES IN THE NONHOMOGENOUS CASE: FRAME BUNDLES. 1. Introduction

Lecture XI: The non-kähler world

MORSE HOMOLOGY. Contents. Manifolds are closed. Fields are Z/2.

NOTES ON DIFFERENTIAL FORMS. PART 1: FORMS ON R n

The Geometry of Euler s equation. Introduction

APPLICATIONS OF HOFER S GEOMETRY TO HAMILTONIAN DYNAMICS

Math 550 / David Dumas / Fall Problems

Lecture 5 - Hausdorff and Gromov-Hausdorff Distance

LECTURE 8: THE MOMENT MAP

RIEMANNIAN MANIFOLDS WITH INTEGRABLE GEODESIC FLOWS

An integral lift of contact homology

COMPUTABILITY AND THE GROWTH RATE OF SYMPLECTIC HOMOLOGY

Topics in Representation Theory: Lie Groups, Lie Algebras and the Exponential Map

Contact and Symplectic Geometry of Monge-Ampère Equations: Introduction and Examples

L 2 Geometry of the Symplectomorphism Group

ANSWERS TO VARIOUS HOMEWORK PROBLEMS IN MATH 3210, FALL 2015

Section 2. Basic formulas and identities in Riemannian geometry

Dirac structures. Henrique Bursztyn, IMPA. Geometry, mechanics and dynamics: the legacy of J. Marsden Fields Institute, July 2012

THE FUNDAMENTAL GROUP OF MANIFOLDS OF POSITIVE ISOTROPIC CURVATURE AND SURFACE GROUPS

Math 147, Homework 5 Solutions Due: May 15, 2012

4 Divergence theorem and its consequences

LECTURE 4: SYMPLECTIC GROUP ACTIONS

Complex manifolds, Kahler metrics, differential and harmonic forms

LECTURE 5: SOME BASIC CONSTRUCTIONS IN SYMPLECTIC TOPOLOGY

Practice Qualifying Exam Questions, Differentiable Manifolds, Fall, 2009.

AN INTRODUCTION TO DIFFERENTIAL FORMS, STOKES THEOREM AND GAUSS-BONNET THEOREM

A BRIEF INTRODUCTION TO DIRAC MANIFOLDS

Introduction to Teichmüller Spaces

A NEW CONSTRUCTION OF POISSON MANIFOLDS

M4P52 Manifolds, 2016 Problem Sheet 1

Groups up to quasi-isometry

Generalized complex geometry

ON NEARLY SEMIFREE CIRCLE ACTIONS

Nicholas Proudfoot Department of Mathematics, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR 97403

Global Lie-Tresse theorem

LECTURE 28: VECTOR BUNDLES AND FIBER BUNDLES

Infinitesimal Einstein Deformations. Kähler Manifolds

Transcription:

Symplectic Geometry versus Riemannian Geometry Inês Cruz, CMUP 2010/10/20 - seminar of PIUDM 1

necessarily very incomplete The aim of this talk is to give an overview of Symplectic Geometry (there is no intention of giving a list of recent results or open problems) 2

Notation: throughout the talk: - M - real, finite-dim al, differentiable manifold without boundary - C ( M ) = { f : M : f is smooth} - χ ( M ) = { X : M TM : X is a vector field} - Ω k M = { ω :TM TM } or Ω k ( M ) = ω : χ M ω p;v 1,,v k { χ ( M ) C ( M )} ω ( X 1,, X k ) C ( M ) given by: ω ( X 1,, X k )( p) = ω p; X 1p,, X kp 3

1. Symplectic Manifolds 1. Riemannian Manifolds Def: Symplectic manifold is a pair ( M,ω ), where: (a) ω Ω 2 ( M ) i.e., = ω ( X,Y ) ω Y, X ω ( fx + gy, Z ) = fω ( X, Z ) + gω ( Y,Z ) (b) ω is nondegenerate, i.e.: ω ( X,Y ) = 0, X χ ( M ) Y = 0 (c) ω is closed, i.e. dω = 0 We call ω a symplectic form. which manifolds qualify for being symplectic? Necessary conditions: (N1) dim M = 2n consider local coordinates ( x 1,, x m ) the matrix A with entries: and build Def: Riemannian manifold is a pair ( M,<,> ), where: (a) <,>: χ(m ) χ(m ) C M < Y, X > = < X,Y > < fx + gy, Z > = f < X, Z > +g < Y,Z > (b) <, > is positive definite. satisfies: Consequence: <, > is nondegenerate. which manifolds qualify for being Riemannian? all smooth manifolds! 4

then (a) and (b) imply: A T = A and det( A) 0 m = 2n (N2) M is oriented consider the nth exterior power: then (b) implies ω (n) = ω ω Ω 2n ( M ) ω (n) is a volume form on M. (N3) if M is compact then H 2 DR ( M, ) 0 ω = dα ω (n) = d α ω ω vol M a ij = ω, x i x i ω ( n) is called symplectic volume. dβ = β = 0 = ω (n) = M M M S 2n is not symplectic, for any n >1 (S 2 is symplectic) 5

2. Examples example 1: M = 2n with coords: { x 1,, x n, y 1,, y n } and symplectic structure given by: ω 0 = n i=1 dx i dy i = dx dy example 2: form: M = T * N ω = dλ with symplectic ( λ is the Liouville 1-form on M : =< α,dπ p,α > ) λ ( p,α ) X X The importance of example 1 will be clear soon. example 2 is behind the Hamiltonian formulation of Conservative Mechanics. 6

3. Special vector fields Nondegeneracy of ω implies that the following is an isomorphism: Def: Given vector field is: Ω 1 ( M ) I : χ M X i X ω = ω X, f C ( M ) X f = I 1 ( df ) its Hamiltonian = df (in other words: ω X f, ) Lemma X f is tangent to the level surface: ΣC = p M : f ( p) = C { } 3. Special vector fields Nondegeneracy of <, > implies that the following is an isomorphism: Def: Given vector field is: Ω 1 ( M ) I : χ M X < X, > f C ( M ) f = I 1 ( df ) its gradient (in other words: < f, >= df ( ) ) Lemma f is normal to the level surface: Σ C = p M : f ( p) = C { } (equivalently f is constant on the flow of X f ) note that: v T Σ C df v = 0 and: if v T Σ C then: < f,v >= df v = 0 = ω ( X f, X f ) = 0 df X f 7

f X f Other important vector fields: Def: A vector field X is said to be symplectic if I(X) is closed. In other words: di X ω = 0 Hamiltonian vector fields are symplectic, since ddf=0. Condition (c) implies that the flow of any symplectic vector field preserves ω : L X ω = di X ω + i X dω = 0 = 0 = 0 because of (c) 8

4. Poisson bracket One can use Hamiltonian vector fields to define an operation between smooth functions: Def: Poisson bracket on M is: {,} :C ( M ) C ( M ) C ( M ) ( f, g) ω X f, X g = df ( X g ) Condition (c) implies this bracket satisfies Jacobi s identity: f,{ g,h} { } { } { } + { g, h, f } + { h, f,g } = 0 which, together with obvious properties of {,}, implies that: ( C ( M ),{,}) is an infinite-dimensional Lie algebra. 9

5. Equivalence 5. Equivalence Def: Two symplectic manifolds ( M,ω ) M ',ω ' and are symplectomorphic if there exists a C 1 map: satisfying: i.e., ϕ : M M ' ϕ * ω ' = ω ( ) = ω p ( X,Y ) ω ' ϕ ( p) dϕ p ( X),dϕ p Y ϕ is called a symplectic map and necessarily dϕ p is injective, for all p so: dim M dim M ' A symplectomorphism is a symplectic diffeomorphism of M. Symplectomorphisms form an (infinite dimensional) subgroup of the group diff(m). Def: Two Riemannian manifolds ( M,<,> ) and ( M ',<,> ') are isometric if there exists a C 1 map: satisfying: < dϕ p ( X),dϕ p Y ϕ : M M ' > ' ϕ p = < X,Y > p ϕ is called an isometry and necessarily dϕ p is injective, for all p so: dim M dim M ' 10

Darboux-Weinstein theorem Let p be any point on a symplectic manifold of dimension 2n. Then there exist local coordinates ( x 1,, x n, y 1,, y n ) (in U) such that: ω U = n i=1 dx i dy i Therefore all symplectic manifolds are (locally) symplectomorphic to example 1. Consequence: there are no local invariants (apart from dimension) in Symplectic Geometry curvature is a local invariant in Riemannian Geometry 11

6. Global Invariants As seen before, a symplectic manifold carries a symplectic volume: If volumes: ϕ : M M ' ω (n) = ω ω is a symplectic map, then it preserves (symplectic) ϕ * ω ' (n) = ϕ * ( ω ' ω ') = ϕ * ω ' but the converse is not true for n > 1. ϕ * ( ω ') = ω ω = ω (n) example: take 2 ( M,ω ) = 4, dx i dy i i=1 ϕ x 1, x 2, y 1, y 2 and consider the map: = 1 2 x 1,2x 2, 1 2 y 1,2y 2 This map preserves the symplectic volume symplectic. 2dx 1 dx 2 dy 1 dy 2 but is not so what really characterizes symplectomorphisms? 12

6.1. Gromov s Nonsqueezing Theorem The key theorem for characterizing symplectomorphisms (using symplectic invariants) is: Nonsqueezing theorem - Gromov (1985) There is a symplectic embedding: ϕ : B 2n ( r),ω 0 if and only if r R. ( Z 2n ( R),ω 0 ) (where: B 2n Z 2n ( r) = x, y ( R) = x, y n 2n : x i 2 + y i 2 < r 2 i=1 { 2n : x 2 1 + y 2 1 < R 2 } open (symplectic) ball of radius r open symplectic cylinder of radius R ) a symplectic embedding is just a symplectic map which is also an embedding. It is denoted by: ϕ :( M,ω ) ( M ',ω '). U,ω U if M,ω is a symplectic manifold and U is open in M, then is also symplectic. 13

The theorem is not valid if symplectic cylinder is replaced by cylinder : C 2n ( R) = ( x, y) 2n : x 2 1 + x 2 2 < R 2 { } example: the following is a symplectic embedding from B 4 (2) into C 4 (1): = 1 2 x 1, 1 2 x 2,2y 1,2y 2 ϕ x 1, x 2, y 1, y 2 14

6.2. Symplectic Invariants - Capacities Using Gromov s nonsqueezing theorem, we will construct a symplectic invariant: Gromov s width. This is one of many symplectic invariants known as symplectic capacities. Let M(2n) denote the set of all symplectic manifolds of dimension 2n. Def Symplectic capacity is a map: satisfying all three properties: c : M ( 2n) + 0 + (1) monotonicity - if there is a symplectic embedding: ( M 2,ω 2 ) ϕ : M 1,ω 1 then c( M 1,ω 1 ) c( M 2,ω 2 ) (2) conformality - c( M,λω ) = λ c( M,ω ) λ 0 (3) (strong) nontriviality - c B 2n ( 1),ω 0 = π = c( Z 2n ( 1),ω 0 ) 15

If n = 1 then (absolute value of) total volume of M is a symplectic capacity. If n > 1 then (absolute value of) total volume of M is not a symplectic capacity (nontriviality fails). Theorem Any symplectic capacity is a symplectic invariant, i.e., if there is a symplectomorphism: then c( M 1,ω 1 ) = c( M 2,ω 2 ). (proof: monotonicity in both ways) ϕ :( M 1,ω 1 ) ( M 2,ω 2 ) Lemma Any symplectic capacity satisfies: c( B 2n ( r),ω 0 ) = πr 2 = c( Z 2n ( r),ω 0 ). (proof: previous theorem+conformality+nontriviality) 16

Theorem The existence of a symplectic capacity is equivalent to Gromov s nonsqueezing theorem. suppose c exists and that: ( Z 2n ( R),ω 0 ) ϕ : B 2n ( r),ω 0 is a symplectic embedding. Then monotonicity+previous lemma imply: so r R. c( Z 2n ( R),ω 0 ) = π R 2 πr 2 = c B 2n ( r),ω 0 define the Gromov s width of a symplectic manifold: W G ( M,ω ) = sup{ πr 2 : ϕ :( B 2n ( r),ω 0 ) ( M,ω )} r >0 (the area of the disk of the bigger ball one can symplectically-embed on ( M,ω ) If Gromov s nonsqueezing theorem holds (it does!) then Gromov s width is a symplectic capacity. 17

Theorem Gromov s width W G is the smallest of all capacities: W G (proof: let c be any capacity and fix r such that there is an embedding: Then monotonicity of c implies: Since this holds for all r and proving the result). ( M,ω ) c( M,ω ), for any capacity c and any ( M,ω ). sup r >0 c( M,ω ) M,ω ϕ : B 2n ( r),ω 0 πr 2 = c B 2n ( r),ω 0 c M,ω is independent of r: { πr 2 : ϕ :( B 2n ( r),ω 0 ) ( M,ω )} c M,ω 18

6.3. Back to Symplectomorphisms We go back to the question: so what really characterizes symplectomorphisms? It turns out that symplectomorphisms of 2n are (almost) characterized by the property of preserving capacity of ellipsoids (1) : Theorem (Eliashberg, 1987) (Hofer, 1990) Let be a diffeomorphism and c a capacity. Then: ( 2n,ω 0 ) c( ϕ ( E,ω 0 )) = c E,ω 0 ϕ : 2n,ω 0 for any ellipsoid E 2n if and only if ϕ is symplectic or anti-symplectic (2). (1) ellipsoid is the image of a ball by a linear/affine diffeomorphism (2) meaning that ϕ * ω 0 = ω 0 19