Global GMPEs. Caribbean Regional Programme Workshop Port of Spain, Trinidad & Tobago, May 2 nd 2011

Similar documents
Global Earthquake Model. KICK-OFF MEETING PEER UC Berkeley 16 th February Global Components - Hazard Ground Motion Prediction Equations (GMPEs)

Recent Advances in Development of Ground Motion Prediction Equations

Next Generation Attenuation (NGA) Projects

NGA-Subduction: Development of the Largest Ground Motion Database for Subduction Events

Blank line 11 pt. Bla

Selection of a Global Set of GMPEs for the GEM-PEER Global GMPEs Project

GEM-PEER Global GMPEs Project Guidance for Including Near-Fault Effects in Ground Motion Prediction Models

GMPE Implementation in OpenQuake (and GEM s Development Tools) Graeme Weatherill

PACIFIC EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING RESEARCH CENTER

Vertical to Horizontal (V/H) Ratios for Large Megathrust Subduction Zone Earthquakes

Ground Motion Prediction Equations: Past, Present, and Future

Hazard Feedback using the. current GMPEs for DCPP. Nick Gregor. PG&E DCPP SSHAC Study. SWUS GMC Workshop 2 October 22, 2013

Ground Motion Prediction Equation Hazard Sensitivity Results for Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station Site (PVNGS)

Global Instrumental Seismicity Catalogue

Damping Scaling of Response Spectra for Shallow CCCCCCCCCrustalstallPaper Crustal Earthquakes in Active Tectonic Title Line Regions 1 e 2

Updated NGA-West2 Ground Motion Prediction Equations for Active Tectonic Regions Worldwide

Eleventh U.S. National Conference on Earthquake Engineering Integrating Science, Engineering & Policy June 25-29, 2018 Los Angeles, California

DIRECT HAZARD ANALYSIS OF INELASTIC RESPONSE SPECTRA

GMPEs for Active Crustal Regions: Applicability for Controlling Sources

Seismic hazard modeling for Bulgaria D. Solakov, S. Simeonova

Updating the Chiou and YoungsNGAModel: Regionalization of Anelastic Attenuation

Estimation of Strong Ground Motion: Aleatory Variability and Epistemic Uncertainty

Representative ground-motion ensembles for several major earthquake scenarios in New Zealand

7 Ground Motion Models

Rupture directivity effects during the April 15, 2016 Kumamoto. Mw7.0 earthquake in Japan

Ground-Motion Prediction Equations (GMPEs) from a Global Dataset: The PEER NGA Equations

Modifications to Existing Ground-Motion Prediction Equations in Light of New Data

Modifications to Risk-Targeted Seismic Design Maps for Subduction and Near-Fault Hazards

GEM Faulted Earth. A Global Active Fault and Fault Source Database

The Ranges of Uncertainty among the Use of NGA-West1 and NGA-West 2 Ground Motion Prediction Equations

Simulation-based Seismic Hazard Analysis Using CyberShake

Ground Motion Prediction Equations for Application to the 2015 Canadian National Seismic Hazard Maps

The transition period T L in the recommended spectra of the draft New Zealand Seismic Isolation Guidelines

Hybrid Empirical Ground-Motion Prediction Equations for Eastern North America Using NGA Models and Updated Seismological Parameters

Regional differences in subduction ground motions

GEM's community tools for probabilistic seismic hazard modelling and calculation

RECORD OF REVISIONS. Page 2 of 17 GEO. DCPP.TR.14.06, Rev. 0

Kappa for Candidate GMPEs

VALIDATION AGAINST NGA EMPIRICAL MODEL OF SIMULATED MOTIONS FOR M7.8 RUPTURE OF SAN ANDREAS FAULT

Updated Graizer-Kalkan GMPEs (GK13) Southwestern U.S. Ground Motion Characterization SSHAC Level 3 Workshop 2 Berkeley, CA October 23, 2013

Maximum Direction to Geometric Mean Spectral Response Ratios using the Relevance Vector Machine

PACIFIC EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING RESEARCH CENTER

UPDATED PROBABILISTIC SEISMIC HAZARD MAPS FOR TURKEY

Non-Ergodic Site Response in Seismic Hazard Analysis

by Shahram Pezeshk, Arash Zandieh, Kenneth W. Campbell, and Behrooz Tavakoli Introduction

The effect of bounds on magnitude, source-to-site distance and site condition in PSHA-based ground motion selection

Selection of Ground Motion Records for Two Dam Sites in Oregon

Relevance Vector Machines for Earthquake Response Spectra

Toward a Ground-Motion Logic Tree for Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Assessment in Europe

Adrian Rodriguez Marek Virginia Tech

Are Ground-Motion Models Derived from Natural Events Applicable to the Estimation of Expected Motions for Induced Earthquakes?

Development of Ground Motion Time Histories for Seismic Design

Beyond Sa GMRotI : Conversion to Sa Arb, Sa SN, and Sa MaxRot

Ground motion selection for performance-based engineering, and the Conditional Mean Spectrum as a selection tool

Hybrid Empirical Ground-Motion Prediction Equations for Eastern North America Using NGA Models and Updated Seismological Parameters

GMPE Development: Duration Model Development

A Test of the Applicability of NGA Models to the Strong Ground-Motion Data in the Iranian Plateau

PEER PSHA Code Verification Project. Christie Hale Norm Abrahamson Yousef Bozorgnia

Usability of the Next Generation Attenuation Equations for Seismic Hazard Assessment in Malaysia

Empirical Correlations between Cumulative Absolute Velocity and Amplitude-Based Ground Motion Intensity Measures

The Role of Physics-Based Ground Motion Models in Non-Ergodic Site-Specific PSHA Studies

Modelling Strong Ground Motions for Subduction Events in the Wellington Region, New Zealand

PGV, and Spectral Accelerations in Europe, the Mediterranean Region, and the Middle East

Strong Ground Motion Attenuation Relations for Chilean Subduction Zone Interface Earthquakes

GROUND MOTION TIME HISTORIES FOR THE VAN NUYS BUILDING

Non-Ergodic Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analyses

Conditional Spectrum Computation Incorporating Multiple Causal Earthquakes and Ground-Motion Prediction Models

Scenario Earthquake Shaking Maps in Japan

Comparisons of Ground Motions from the 1999 Chi-Chi Earthquake with Empirical Predictions Largely Based on Data from California

Seismic Displacement Demands for Performance-Based Design and Rehabilitation of Structures in North America

Ground motion directionality in the Canterbury earthquakes

NGA-West2 Research Project

Time-varying and long-term mean aftershock hazard in Wellington

Comparisons of ground motions from the M 9 Tohoku earthquake with ground-motion prediction equations for subduction interface earthquakes

Arthur Frankel, William Stephenson, David Carver, Jack Odum, Robert Williams, and Susan Rhea U.S. Geological Survey

Seismic Hazard Assessment Study for the Eastern Caribbean Islands

CAMPBELL-BOZORGNIA NEXT GENERATION ATTENUATION (NGA) RELATIONS FOR PGA, PGV AND SPECTRAL ACCELERATION: A PROGRESS REPORT

BC HYDRO SSHAC LEVEL 3 PSHA STUDY METHODOLOGY

Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project (FERC No ) Site-Specific Seismic Hazard Study Study Plan Section 16.6

PACIFIC EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING RESEARCH CENTER

Single-Station Phi Using NGA-West2 Data

Site-specific hazard analysis for geotechnical design in New Zealand

Comparison of NGA-West2 GMPEs

A NEW PROBABILISTIC SEISMIC HAZARD MODEL FOR NEW ZEALAND

Scientific Research on the Cascadia Subduction Zone that Will Help Improve Seismic Hazard Maps, Building Codes, and Other Risk-Mitigation Measures

NEXT GENERATION ATTENUATION (NGA) EMPIRICAL GROUND MOTION MODELS: CAN THEY BE USED IN EUROPE?

Assessment of Point-Source Stochastic Simulations Using Recently Derived Ground-Motion Prediction Equations

Malaysian Journal of Civil Engineering 22(1) : (2010) Malaysia

New developments in the evaluation of seismic hazard for Romania

Ground-Motion Attenuation Relationships for Subduction- Zone Earthquakes in Northern Taiwan

GROUND MOTION TIME HISTORIES FOR THE VAN NUYS BUILDING

Empirical Ground-Motion Models for Point- and Extended-Source Crustal Earthquake. Scenarios in Europe and the Middle East

Peak ground accelerations from large (M 7.2) shallow crustal earthquakes: a comparison with predictions from eight recent ground-motion models

Review of The Canterbury Earthquake Sequence and Implications. for Seismic Design Levels dated July 2011

NGA-West2 Models for Ground Motion Directionality

Comparison of response spectra from Australian earthquakes and North American attenuation models

CONDITIONAL PULSE PROBABILITY FOR NEAR-SOURCE HAZARD ANALYSIS

Development of Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analysis for International Sites, Challenges and Guidelines

PACIFIC EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING RESEARCH CENTER. NGA-West2 Ground Motion Prediction Equations for Vertical Ground Motions

PACIFIC EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING RESEARCH CENTER

Transcription:

Caribbean Regional Programme Workshop Port of Spain, Trinidad & Tobago, May 2 nd 2011 Global GMPEs Marco Pagani Executive Committee Hazard Coordinator, GEM Foundation Slides based on C. Di Alessandro presentation - GEM Review Meeting December 2010

PROJECT MANAGEMENT Principal investigators / Leading Institutions Yousef Bozgornia (PEER, Berkley) There is a project coordination committee consisting of four international experts (Abrahamson, Akkar, Bozorgnia, Erdik), who coordinate the tasks, and communicate with GEM s Executive Committee and the Regional Programs. and a large group of international experts In total there are 26 international experts participating in the project (from South Africa, Russia, China, Latin America etc). Combined, they have extensive GMPE expertise in various parts of the world. Project duration 24 months

PROJECT OUTCOMES Main Products/Goal The main goal of the project is to select a suite of GMPEs that can be used at both the global and regional level for hazard and risk assessment, by using a collaborative approach.

TASKS " Task 1: Definition of a consistent strategy of modelling ground motion. a. consistency in model parameters b. consistency in site parameters " Task 2: Compilation and critical review of GMPEs " Task 3: Selection or derivation of a Global Set of GMPEs. " Task 4: Inclusion of near-fault effects " Task 5: Database of Recorded Waveform " Task 6: Specifications for compilation of a global database of Soil Classification.

PROJECT COORDINATION COMMITTEE Abrahamson - Akkar Bozorgnia - Erdik TASK 1: Define a Consistent Strategy to Model Ground Motion TASK 1a Akkar (Chair) Campbell Cotton / Douglas Silva TASK 1b Stewart (Chair) Boore Campbell Erdik Silva TASK 2: Compile and Critically Review GMPEs Cotton and Douglas (Co-Chairs) Abrahamson Akkar Boore Di Alessandro TASK 3: Select or Derive a Global Set of GMPEs WG Campbell (Chair) Abrahamson Bommer Boore Bozorgnia Di Alessandro Erdik Scherbaum Extended WG Akkar Arefiev Cheng Chiou - Cotton / Douglas Fajfar - McVerry Midorikawa - Midzi Molas - Saragoni Shoja - Silva Somerville Stewart - Wang

CONSORTIUM and ORGANIZATION CHART PROJECT COORDINATION COMMITTEE Abrahamson - Akkar Bozorgnia - Erdik TASK 4: Include Near-Fault Effects Baker (Chair) Chiou Erdik Somerville Silva TASK 5: Build a Database of Recorded Waveforms Akkar (Chair) Arefiev Boroshek Di Alessandro McVerry Midorikawa TASK 6: Design the Specifications to Compile a Global Database of Soil Classification Stewart (Chair) Boore Campbell Erdik Silva

IMPORTANT INFORMATION The contract was signed on November 16 th, 2010 (kick-off meeting to be organized soon!) Changes in the Coordination Committee: " J. Bommer has been substituted by S. Akkar: The latter is now also Chair of Task 1.a (consistency in model parameters) Changes in the Working Groups: " J. Bommer has been substituted by Cotton & Douglas: who are currently Chairs of Task 2 (compile and critically review GMPEs) Addition in the Working Groups: " G. McVerry will work on the GMPEs for Volcanic Areas as an additional sub-task within Task 2 (compile and critically review GMPEs)

TASK 1 STRATEGY FOR GROUND MOTION MODELLING Task 1a: Consistency in Model Parameters. Magnitude Style of faulting classification Use of ground motion in terms of geometric mean vs maximum component Approach; e.g., empirically-based models versus simulation-based Task 1b: Consistency in site parameters Define a consistent set of site parameters to be used Recommend simplification of GMPEs for regions with less data On going activities Duration: 8 months. Completion: 8 months after project s start Learn from successful past experience (NGA-West) Interact with other regional or international projects to ensure consistency.

TASK 2 Compile and review large set of GMPEs for Shallow crustal earthquakes in active tectonic regions Stable continental regions Subduction regions (subduction zone interface vs. intraslab) Volcanic earthquakes Duration: 8m. Completion: 8m after project s start On going activities Douglas REPORT on existing GMPEs (1964-2010 incl.) Harmonization of approaches towards GMPEs SELECTION or EXCLUSION (SHARE, PEGASUS, NGA-EAST, BC-HYDRO) Validation of GMPEs developed for limited area (for instance Vrancea Romania) Checking NGA Models against regional data in high seismicity areas other regional or international projects to ensure consistency.

TASK 3 Task 3: Selection or derivation of a Global Set of GMPEs For each tectonic region, a set of GMPEs will be selected to be - Applicable to a wide range of magnitude, distance etc - Compatible with the regional data Duration: 18m. Completion: 24 m after project s start Selected GMPEs (coefficients, parameters definitions and coded equations) will be organized in various files (which format?) On going activities GUIDELINES to compute RESIDUALS (procedural consensus and software development) Review GMPEs EVALUATIONS literature and schemes TEST PERFORMANCE against REGIONAL DATASET

TASK 5 Task 5: Database of Waveforms Data already collected by PEER for shallow crustal earthquakes in active tectonic regions (NGA-West) and for stable continental regions (NGA-East): is available online (through PEER website) Newly collected data from other regions Magnitude 8 7 6 Duration: 18 months. Completion: 24 months after project s start On going activities 5 Previous Data New Data 4 0.1 1 10 100 1000 Distance (km) " COLLECTION of PEER DATABASE " COMMUNICATION (and future exchange) with SHARE project (EUROPE) " ESTABLISHING CONTACTS with OTHER REGIONS such as Africa, Russia and Australia " Seeking for synergy with REGIONAL PROGRAMMES within GEM

TASKS 4 AND 6 Task 4: Inclusion of near-fault effects A working group will provide recommendations regarding correction of GMPEs for near-fault effects, including directivity and directionality Latitude 35 34.5 1992 Landers, CA, EQ Lucerne Valley 136 cm/sec Rupture propagation Forward directivity region Epicenter 34 Joshua Tree 43 cm/sec Task 6: Specifications to Compile Soil Database Backward directivity region -117-116.5-116 Longitude " A working group of experts will write specifications for collection of the soil data " No soil data will be collected under this task WILL START IN THE NEXT 12 18 MONTHS, RESPECTIVELY

RELEVANT ISSUES Cooperation with other projects Cooperation with other Consortia and Regional Programmes on GMPE standards and use remains a key element