Group Theory - QMII 2017

Similar documents
Particles I, Tutorial notes Sessions I-III: Roots & Weights

Symmetries, Groups, and Conservation Laws

4. Killing form, root space inner product, and commutation relations * version 1.5 *

Notes on Lie Algebras

Physics 129B, Winter 2010 Problem Set 4 Solution

Simple Lie algebras. Classification and representations. Roots and weights

Lecture 10: A (Brief) Introduction to Group Theory (See Chapter 3.13 in Boas, 3rd Edition)

Introduction to Group Theory

Symmetries, Fields and Particles. Examples 1.

L(C G (x) 0 ) c g (x). Proof. Recall C G (x) = {g G xgx 1 = g} and c g (x) = {X g Ad xx = X}. In general, it is obvious that

Physics 251 Solution Set 4 Spring 2013

Lecture notes for Mathematical Physics. Joseph A. Minahan 1 Department of Physics and Astronomy Box 516, SE Uppsala, Sweden

BRST and Dirac Cohomology

QUANTUM MECHANIC S. Symmetries

Part III Symmetries, Fields and Particles

Highest-weight Theory: Verma Modules

Symmetries, Fields and Particles 2013 Solutions

Physics 557 Lecture 5

LIE ALGEBRAS: LECTURE 7 11 May 2010

Mic ael Flohr Representation theory of semi-simple Lie algebras: Example su(3) 6. and 20. June 2003

1 Classifying Unitary Representations: A 1

GROUP THEORY PRIMER. D(g 1 g 2 ) = D(g 1 )D(g 2 ), g 1, g 2 G. and, as a consequence, (2) (3)

Kirillov Theory. TCU GAGA Seminar. Ruth Gornet. January University of Texas at Arlington

The Cartan Decomposition of a Complex Semisimple Lie Algebra

MAT 445/ INTRODUCTION TO REPRESENTATION THEORY

2.4 Root space decomposition

Topics in Representation Theory: SU(n), Weyl Chambers and the Diagram of a Group

Problem Set (T) If A is an m n matrix, B is an n p matrix and D is a p s matrix, then show

The groups SO(3) and SU(2) and their representations

On the singular elements of a semisimple Lie algebra and the generalized Amitsur-Levitski Theorem

Notes on nilpotent orbits Computational Theory of Real Reductive Groups Workshop. Eric Sommers

Group representations

The Gelfand-Tsetlin Basis (Too Many Direct Sums, and Also a Graph)

Group theory - QMII 2017

Topics in Representation Theory: Roots and Complex Structures

CLASSICAL GROUPS DAVID VOGAN

Left-invariant Einstein metrics

INTRODUCTION TO LIE ALGEBRAS. LECTURE 1.

Group Theory and the Quark Model

Tutorial 5 Clifford Algebra and so(n)

Quantum Field Theory III

7. The classical and exceptional Lie algebras * version 1.4 *

THE THEOREM OF THE HIGHEST WEIGHT

1. Rotations in 3D, so(3), and su(2). * version 2.0 *

LINEAR ALGEBRA BOOT CAMP WEEK 4: THE SPECTRAL THEOREM

Kac-Moody Algebras. Ana Ros Camacho June 28, 2010

LECTURE 25-26: CARTAN S THEOREM OF MAXIMAL TORI. 1. Maximal Tori

SEMISIMPLE LIE GROUPS

1.4 Solvable Lie algebras

Symmetries and particle physics Exercises

33 Idempotents and Characters

Background on Chevalley Groups Constructed from a Root System

Symmetries, Fields and Particles 2013 Solutions

CHAPTER 6. Representations of compact groups

Topics in Representation Theory: Roots and Weights

Differential Geometry, Lie Groups, and Symmetric Spaces

10. Cartan Weyl basis

REPRESENTATION THEORY OF S n

Representations Are Everywhere

Representations of Lorentz Group

LIE ALGEBRAS: LECTURE 3 6 April 2010

Cartan s Criteria. Math 649, Dan Barbasch. February 26

Notation. For any Lie group G, we set G 0 to be the connected component of the identity.

1 Linear Algebra Problems

Problems in Linear Algebra and Representation Theory

Simple Lie algebras. Classification and representations. Roots and weights

A 2 G 2 A 1 A 1. (3) A double edge pointing from α i to α j if α i, α j are not perpendicular and α i 2 = 2 α j 2

4 Group representations

GROUP THEORY PRIMER. New terms: tensor, rank k tensor, Young tableau, Young diagram, hook, hook length, factors over hooks rule

Lecture 11 The Radical and Semisimple Lie Algebras

5 Irreducible representations

8. COMPACT LIE GROUPS AND REPRESENTATIONS

Exercises Lie groups

Continuous symmetries and conserved currents

GROUP THEORY PRIMER. New terms: so(2n), so(2n+1), symplectic algebra sp(2n)

Homework set 5 - Solutions

REPRESENTATION THEORY WEEK 7

Elementary linear algebra

Semi-Simple Lie Algebras and. Their Representations. Robert N. Cahn. Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory. University of California. Berkeley, California

Plan for the rest of the semester. ψ a

MATH 423 Linear Algebra II Lecture 33: Diagonalization of normal operators.

Algebraic Theory of Entanglement

Lie Theory in Particle Physics

On the Harish-Chandra Embedding

Linear Algebra. Min Yan

Representation theory & the Hubbard model

Clifford Algebras and Spin Groups

Review of Linear Algebra Definitions, Change of Basis, Trace, Spectral Theorem

Appendix Complexifications of Real Lie Algebras and the Tensor Product Decomposition of sl(2, C) R Representations

Lecture Notes Introduction to Cluster Algebra

Lemma 1.3. The element [X, X] is nonzero.

The Homogenous Lorentz Group

Topics in Representation Theory: Lie Groups, Lie Algebras and the Exponential Map

Quantum Computing Lecture 2. Review of Linear Algebra

Matrix Lie groups. and their Lie algebras. Mahmood Alaghmandan. A project in fulfillment of the requirement for the Lie algebra course

Lorentz-covariant spectrum of single-particle states and their field theory Physics 230A, Spring 2007, Hitoshi Murayama

Algebra I Fall 2007

Representations of Matrix Lie Algebras

INTRODUCTION TO REPRESENTATION THEORY AND CHARACTERS

Contents. Preface for the Instructor. Preface for the Student. xvii. Acknowledgments. 1 Vector Spaces 1 1.A R n and C n 2

Transcription:

Group Theory - QMII 017 Reminder Last time we said that a group element of a matrix lie group can be written as an exponent: U = e iαaxa, a = 1,..., N. We called X a the generators, we have N of them, they span a basis for the Lie algebra, and they can be found by taking the derivative with respect to α a at α = 0. The generators are closed under the Lie product ( [, ]), and related by the structure constants [X a, X b ] = if abc X c. (1) We end with the Jacobi identity [X a, [X b, X c ]] + [X b, [X c, X a ]] + [X c, [X a, X b ]] = 0. () 1 Representations of Lie Algebra 1.1 The adjoint rep. part- I One of the most important representations is the adjoint. There are two equivalent ways to defined it. Here we follow the definition by Georgi. By plugging Eq. (1) into the Jacobi identity Eq. () we get the following: f bcd f ade + f abd f cde + f cad f bde = 0 (3) Proof: 0 = [X a, [X b, X c ]] + [X b, [X c, X a ]] + [X c, [X a, X b ]] = if bcd [X a, X d ] + if cad [X b, X d ] + if abd [X c, X d ] = (f bcd f ade + f cad f bde + f abd f cde ) X e (4) 1

Now we can define a set of matrices T a s.t. [T a ] bc = if abc. (5) Then by using the relation of the structure constants Eq. (3) we get [T a, T b ] = if abc T c. (6) Proof: [T a, T b ] ce = [T a ] cd [T b ] de [T b ] cd [T a ] de = f acd f bde + f bcd f ade which means that: = f cad f bde + f bcd f ade = f abd f cde = f abd f dce = if abd [T d ] ce (7) [T a, T b ] = if abd T d. (8) Therefore the structure constants themselves generate a representation. This representation is called the adjoint representation. The adjoint of su() We already found that the structure constants of su() are given by the Levi-Civita tensor. Therefore we get: 0 0 0 0 0 i 0 i 0 T 1 = 0 0 i, T = 0 0 0, T 3 = i 0 0 (9) 0 i 0 i 0 0 0 0 0 Back to the adjoint We can define a scalar product on the linear space of the generators in the adjoint representation as tr(t a T b ). This is a real symmetric matrix, and hence can be diagonalized with orthogonal matrix. By performing a linear

transformation on the generators: X a X a = S ab X b (10) with some orthogonal matrix S, Eq. (10) induces the following transformation of the structure constants f abc f abc = S ad S be f deg S 1 gc. (11) The matrices T a of the adjoint representation transform by T a T a = S ab ( STb S 1) (1) which is a combination of a similarity transformation and simultaneously a linear transformation of the form (10). In the trace, however, only the latter transformation matters and we obtain tr(t a T b ) tr(t at b) = S ac S bd tr(t c T d ) = S ac tr(t c T d )(S T ) db (13) tr(t T ) S tr(t T ) S T Selecting a diagonal basis, we write tr(t a T b ) = κ a δ ab (no sum!) (14) However, we still have freedom to re-scale our generators. We shall assume that all of the κ a are positive. This will be the case if the algebra is compact 1 and semisimple. Then we can just go ahead and write tr(t a T b ) = λδ ab (15) with some positive λ. 1 Non-compact Lie algebras, in which some of the κ a are negative, do not have nontrivial, finite dimensional unitary representations. They still, however, play an important role in physics: The lorentz algebra is an example. A semisimple group contains no nontrivial abelian invariant subgroup. 3

A nice feature of this basis comes from the following: tr([t a, T b ]T c ) = if abd tr(t d T c ) = iλf abc f abc = iλ 1 tr([t a, T b ]T c ). (16) Thanks to the trace we find that the structure constants in this basis are completely anti-symmetric! 1. Adjoint, states, and why we call it a rep. So far we didn t define a representation of a Lie algebra. In fact the definition is straight forward once we defined it for a group: Representation - A rep. of a Lie algebra g is a linear map π : g gl(n, C) (17) that preserves the product, X, Y g π([x, Y ]) = [π(x), π(y )]. (18) A linear map between two Lie algebras that preserves the product is called a Lie algebra homomorphism. If this map is 1-to-1 and onto it is called an isomorphism. 1..1 States and the adjoint Here we would like to generalize our construction of the regular representation to semi-simple Lie groups. 1. For each generator T a g associate a vector T a s.t. they form an orthonormal basis, T a T b = λ 1 tr(t at b ) = δ 3 ab.. Define the adjoint representation on this vector space as ad(t a ) T b = [T a, T b ] (19) 3 The dagger will become important in the following sections. 4

exercise check that this is a rep, i.e. [ad(x), ad(y )] = ad([x, Y ]). 3. The components of the matrices are given by [ad(t a )] bc T b ad(t a ) T c = if acd T b T d = if abc = [T a ] bc (0) So the remarkable thing is that ad(t a ) = T a. Therefore it sometimes said that the adjoint representation is the action of the algebra on itself. Note that there are few different (but equivalent) definitions for the adjoint representation. We will make use of the construction given above in For completeness we define the following: Irrep. - A Lie algebra rep π : g gl(v ) is irreducible if there is no nontrivial subspace W V such that X g π(x)w W. (1) Subalgebra and the Cartan subalgebra Lie Subalgebra - For a given Lie algebra g, if a subspace h g is a Lie subalgebra if it is closed under the Lie product, X, Y h, i[x, Y ] h. () Example -su(3) and su() You saw in class that the Gell-Mann matrices are a good basis for su(3): σ λ i = 1 0 i 0, i = 1,, 3 λ 4 = 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 λ 5 = 1 0 0 i 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 i 0 0 λ 6 = 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 λ 7 = 1 0 0 0 0 0 i λ 8 = 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 3 0 1 0 0 i 0 0 0 5

It s easy to see that [λ i, λ j ] = iɛ ijk λ k for i, j, k = 1,, 3. This is also the algebra of su(). Therefore su() is a subalgebra of su(3)..1 Cartan subalgebra Cartan Subalgebra - A Cartan Subalgebra h, is the maximal commuting subalgebra of a Lie algebra g. Namely, 1. H 1, H h, [H 1, H ] = 0.. If X g and [X, H] = 0 for all H h, then X h. Example -su(3) The Cartan subalgebra of su(3) can be chosen as λ 3 = 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 λ 8 = 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 All Cartan subalgebras of g have the same dimension. We define the rank of an algebra to be the dimension of its Cartan subalgebra..1.1 Casimir operator A Casimir operator is an operator (in the enveloping algebra) that commutes with all members of the algebra. For example, J = Jx +Jy +Jz is a Casimir of su(). The number of Casimirs is equal to the rank of the algebra. 6

3 Roots and Weights The philosophy of Roots and weights is to give a geometrical interpretation to a minimal (to be defined later) number of generators, and then by using this geometrical interpretation to construct the whole algebra, and to construct all irreps. of the group. 3.1 Weights Recall that any number of commuting linear operators is simultaneously diagonalizable, thus we can choose a basis in which all of the H i are diagonalized. In this basis their action on the states of some irrep of dim D is H i µ, D = µ i µ, D. (3) The entries µ i are the weights. Since H i are hermitian µ i R. The vector µ is called the weight vector. It s a real vector of length M. We have D of those. In different irreps we will get different weight vectors. 3. Roots The weights of the adjoint representation are called Roots. 1. We choose an orthonormal basis for the Cartan states H i H j = λ 1 tr(h i H j ) = δ ij. (4). The Cartan generators have zero roots since H i H j = [H i, H j ] = 0. (5) 7

3. The other states of the adjoint, those not corresponding to the Cartan, have non-zero roots. H i E α = α i E α [H i, E α ] = α i E α. (6) α is called the root vector. 4. Since α is real [ ] Hi, E α = αi E α E α = E α. (7) It means that in the basis where the Cartan generators are diagonal, the rest of the generators are no longer hermitian! As we will see, E ±α will play the role of J ± in SU(). 5. Since E α are not hermitian we defined their inner product as E α E β = λ 1 tr(e αe β ) = δ αβ. (8) 6. The state E α E α has zero root. Therefore [E α, E α ] is in the Cartan [E α, E α ] = β i H i (9) By using orthonormality of the Cartan generators we can calculate β i β i = H i E α E α = λ 1 tr (H i [E α, E α ]) = λ 1 tr (E α [H i, E α ]) = α i So we conclude that [E α, E α ] = α i H i. (30) 8