Introduction to Quantum Spin Systems

Similar documents
Automorphic Equivalence Within Gapped Phases

Frustration-free Ground States of Quantum Spin Systems 1

Frustration-free Ground States of Quantum Spin Systems 1

A classification of gapped Hamiltonians in d = 1

The AKLT Model. Lecture 5. Amanda Young. Mathematics, UC Davis. MAT290-25, CRN 30216, Winter 2011, 01/31/11

Propagation bounds for quantum dynamics and applications 1

On positive maps in quantum information.

MAT265 Mathematical Quantum Mechanics Brief Review of the Representations of SU(2)

Introduction to the Mathematics of the XY -Spin Chain

Analysis Preliminary Exam Workshop: Hilbert Spaces

Quantum Many Body Systems and Tensor Networks

SPECTRAL THEOREM FOR COMPACT SELF-ADJOINT OPERATORS

08a. Operators on Hilbert spaces. 1. Boundedness, continuity, operator norms

REPRESENTATION THEORY WEEK 7

Ferromagnetic Ordering of Energy Levels for XXZ Spin Chains

The following definition is fundamental.

Quantum Computing Lecture 3. Principles of Quantum Mechanics. Anuj Dawar

Recitation 1 (Sep. 15, 2017)

A Brief Introduction to Functional Analysis

The Simple Harmonic Oscillator

Spectral Theorem for Self-adjoint Linear Operators

MP463 QUANTUM MECHANICS

5 Compact linear operators

Hilbert space methods for quantum mechanics. S. Richard

Chapter 5. Density matrix formalism

ALGEBRA 8: Linear algebra: characteristic polynomial

4th Preparation Sheet - Solutions

Attempts at relativistic QM

MATH 423 Linear Algebra II Lecture 33: Diagonalization of normal operators.

Stability of local observables

Chapter 6 Inner product spaces

Mic ael Flohr Representation theory of semi-simple Lie algebras: Example su(3) 6. and 20. June 2003

H ψ = E ψ. Introduction to Exact Diagonalization. Andreas Läuchli, New states of quantum matter MPI für Physik komplexer Systeme - Dresden

MA5206 Homework 4. Group 4. April 26, ϕ 1 = 1, ϕ n (x) = 1 n 2 ϕ 1(n 2 x). = 1 and h n C 0. For any ξ ( 1 n, 2 n 2 ), n 3, h n (t) ξ t dt

1 Math 241A-B Homework Problem List for F2015 and W2016

Quantum Computing Lecture 2. Review of Linear Algebra

Lie algebraic aspects of quantum control in interacting spin-1/2 (qubit) chains

Lecture notes for Mathematics 208 William Arveson. 24 November 1998

Representation theory & the Hubbard model

Chapter 4 Euclid Space

Random Fermionic Systems

Compression, Matrix Range and Completely Positive Map

Decay of correlations in 2d quantum systems

2. Introduction to quantum mechanics

1 Mathematical preliminaries

1 Readings. 2 Unitary Operators. C/CS/Phys C191 Unitaries and Quantum Gates 9/22/09 Fall 2009 Lecture 8

Applied Analysis (APPM 5440): Final exam 1:30pm 4:00pm, Dec. 14, Closed books.

Introduction to Quantum Computing

Quantum Phase Transitions

AN EFFECTIVE METRIC ON C(H, K) WITH NORMAL STRUCTURE. Mona Nabiei (Received 23 June, 2015)

4.3 Lecture 18: Quantum Mechanics

SYLLABUS. 1 Linear maps and matrices

Representation theory and quantum mechanics tutorial Spin and the hydrogen atom

BRST and Dirac Cohomology

Functional Analysis II held by Prof. Dr. Moritz Weber in summer 18

Dynamics and Quantum Channels

TD 1: Hilbert Spaces and Applications

Resolvent Algebras. An alternative approach to canonical quantum systems. Detlev Buchholz

Lecture 5: Orbital angular momentum, spin and rotation

Quantum Field Theory

WOMP 2001: LINEAR ALGEBRA. 1. Vector spaces

Introduction to Quantum Mechanics

Postulates of quantum mechanics

U.C. Berkeley Better-than-Worst-Case Analysis Handout 3 Luca Trevisan May 24, 2018

Physics 239/139 Spring 2018 Assignment 2 Solutions

Hilbert Space, Entanglement, Quantum Gates, Bell States, Superdense Coding.

SPECTRAL PROPERTIES OF THE LAPLACIAN ON BOUNDED DOMAINS

4 Matrix product states

Quantum mechanics in one hour

Quantum Mechanics I Physics 5701

SPECTRAL THEOREM FOR SYMMETRIC OPERATORS WITH COMPACT RESOLVENT

here, this space is in fact infinite-dimensional, so t σ ess. Exercise Let T B(H) be a self-adjoint operator on an infinitedimensional

Quantum mechanics. Chapter The quantum mechanical formalism

The Principles of Quantum Mechanics: Pt. 1

FUNCTIONAL ANALYSIS-NORMED SPACE

C.6 Adjoints for Operators on Hilbert Spaces

A geometric analysis of the Markovian evolution of open quantum systems

The Hamiltonian and the Schrödinger equation Consider time evolution from t to t + ɛ. As before, we expand in powers of ɛ; we have. H(t) + O(ɛ 2 ).

LECTURE NOTE #11 PROF. ALAN YUILLE

Loos Symmetric Cones. Jimmie Lawson Louisiana State University. July, 2018

THE FORM SUM AND THE FRIEDRICHS EXTENSION OF SCHRÖDINGER-TYPE OPERATORS ON RIEMANNIAN MANIFOLDS

Short note on compact operators - Monday 24 th March, Sylvester Eriksson-Bique

A proof of the Jordan normal form theorem

LINEAR PRESERVER PROBLEMS: generalized inverse

REPRESENTATION THEORY WEEK 5. B : V V k

Representation theory of SU(2), density operators, purification Michael Walter, University of Amsterdam

C/CS/Phys 191 Quantum Gates and Universality 9/22/05 Fall 2005 Lecture 8. a b b d. w. Therefore, U preserves norms and angles (up to sign).

von Neumann algebras, II 1 factors, and their subfactors V.S. Sunder (IMSc, Chennai)

Density Matrices. Chapter Introduction

1 Definition and Basic Properties of Compa Operator

4 Linear operators and linear functionals

Tensor network simulations of strongly correlated quantum systems

Unitary Dynamics and Quantum Circuits

Quantum Mechanics C (130C) Winter 2014 Assignment 7

Mathematical Analysis of a Generalized Chiral Quark Soliton Model

Berry s phase in Hall Effects and Topological Insulators

MAGNETIC BLOCH FUNCTIONS AND VECTOR BUNDLES. TYPICAL DISPERSION LAWS AND THEIR QUANTUM NUMBERS

A Glimpse of Quantum Computation

Topic 1: Matrix diagonalization

Elementary linear algebra

Transcription:

1 Introduction to Quantum Spin Systems Lecture 2 Sven Bachmann (standing in for Bruno Nachtergaele) Mathematics, UC Davis MAT290-25, CRN 30216, Winter 2011, 01/10/11 2 Basic Setup For concreteness, consider finite subsets Λ Z d, and assume H x = C n, for all x Z d. The Hilbert space describing the total system is H Λ = H x. x Λ The algebra of observables of the system is A Λ = x Λ B(H x ) = B(H Λ ). If X Λ, we have A X A Λ, by identifying A A X with A 1l Λ\X A Λ. The algebra of local observables A loc is then defined by (inductive limit): A loc = A Λ. Λ Z d

3 4 The C -algebra A Since A loc is built from the net of matrix algebras B(H Λ ), it inherits a natural -operation and norm (note A 1l = A ) from them with the following basic properties: A loc is an algebra with unit 1l (1l = 1l, 1l = 1); A = A, (A + B) = A + B, (λa) = λa, (AB) = B A ; the positive elements are defined as all A of the form B B; A A = A 2, A + B A + B, AB A B, λa = λ A, A = 0 A = 0. All these properties carry over from properties for bounded linear operators on a Hilbert space, although A loc is not obviously a set of operators on a Hilbert space. By definition, a C -algebra is an algebra with all these properties which, in addition, is complete for the norm topology. Later we will use this compeltion denoted by A Z d = A loc, or A for short. States For any algebra of observables A as above (e.g., A Λ, A loc, or A Z d ), a state on A is linear functional ω : A C with the following two properties: Positivity: ω(a A) 0, for all A A; Normalization: ω(1l) = 1. finite dimensional, it yields the set of all the density matrices. Theorem Let H = C n and ω a state on B(H), then there exists a unique density matrix ρ B(H) (ρ 0, Trρ = 1) such that ω(a) = TrρA, for all A B(H). The proof is an exercise.

5 Bloch sphere Example/Exercise: Let H = C 2. Then all states ω on B(H) = M 2 (C) are of the form ( ) r µ ω(a) = TrρA, ρ = (1) µ 1 r where r [0, 1] and µ C s.t. µ 2 r(1 r). The parameters have a simple interpretation in terms of the basic observables (S 1, S 2, S 3 ) = 1 2 (σ1, σ 2, σ 3 ) (2) TrρS 1 = Re µ, TrρS 2 = Im µ, TrρS 3 = r 1 2 (3) Exercise: ρ is a rank-1 projection and ω = ψ, ψ for a unit vector ψ H iff µ 2 = r(1 r). 6 General Properties of States Theorem Let ω be a state on A. Then: 1. ω(a ) = ω(a) 2. ω(a B) 2 ω(a A)ω(B B) (Cauchy-Schwarz ineq.) 3. ω(a) A 4. ω(a BA) B ω(a A) For proofs of these properties in the case of arbitrary A, see Bratteli & Robinson, vol 1. The set of all states on a given algebra A is convex. The extreme points of this set are called pure states.

7 Hamiltonian Dynamics A quantum spin model is typically defined by specifying for a family of finite Λ, the Hamiltonian: H Λ = HΛ A Λ. Then, U t = e ithλ, is unitary for all t R. The dynamics on A Λ is defined by α t (A) = Ut AU t (4) The maps α t have the following properties: α t : A Λ A Λ is linear; α t (AB) = α t (A)α t (B) α t (A ) = α t (A) α t (1l) = 1l α t (A) = A, A A Λ 8 These properties characterize each α t as an automorphism of the C -algebra A Λ. Furthermore, the family {α t t R} has the properties α 0 = id; α t α s = α t+s, for all t, s R; lim t 0 α t (A) A = 0, for all A A Λ We say that {α t } a strongly continuous one-parameter group of automorphisms of A Λ. This dynamics on observables is the so-called Heisenberg picture. A t = α t (A) satisfies the Heisenberg equation d dt A t = i[h, A t ] iδ(a t ) (5) and α t = e itδ = e it[h, ] (6) δ is a derivation on A Λ : It is linear and δ(ab) = δ(a)b + Aδ(B).

9 The Schrödinger picture is given by ψ t = U t ψ 0, which is the solution of the Schrödinger equation: d dt ψ t = ih Λ ψ t In the case of dim H =, and H a densely-defined (unbounded) self adjoint operator, this equation can still be solved by a group of unitaries U t = e ith. Theorem (Stone s Theorem) Let U t be a strongly continuous one-parameter group (lim t 0 U t ψ = ψ, for all ψ) of unitaries on H. Then there exists a s.a. operator H with dense domain Dom(H) such that U t = e ith (7) and such that for all φ Dom(H), lim t 0 Ut φ φ t = ihφ 10 The Heisenberg Model Example: For x, y Z d, let x y denote the lattice distance between x and y. x and y are called nearest neighbors if x y = 1. Let H x = C 2, for all x. The Hamiltonians of the spin-1/2 (homogeneous and isotropic) Heisenberg ferromagnet on Λ is given by H Λ = S x S y (8) x,y Λ, x y =1 where S = (S 1, S 2, S 3 ) = 1 2 (σ1, σ 2, σ 3 ) and the subscript x denotes that S i is considered as an element of A {x}.

11 Ground states and the spectral gap Some of the first and most important questions to address about the Hamiltonians H Λ are the 1) what is the number of ground states, 2) what is the magnitude of the spectral gap above the ground state energy, and 3) what are the salient features of the ground states and low-lying excited states. Ground state: eigenvector with eigenvalue E 0 = inf spech. Spectral gap above the ground state: if dim H Λ <, and H has eigenvalues E 0 < E 1 < E 2 <..., we define γ = E 1 E 0 > 0. In general γ = sup{δ 0 spech Λ (E 0, E 0 + δ) = } 0. If E 0 is simple, one says that the system has a unique (or non-degenerate) ground state. 12 Back to the spin 1/2 Heisenberg Model The Hamiltonian is H Λ = J S x S y x y =1,x,y Λ with J > 0 (J < 0) corresponding to the (anti-)ferromagnet. It is useful the introduce σ ± such that σ 1 = σ + + σ, σ 2 = i(σ σ + ). Then S x S y = 1 2 (σ+ x σy + σx σ y + ) + 1 4 σ3 xσy 3 = 1 2 t xy 1 4 1l. where t xy A {x,y} acting on C 2 C 2 as the swap of the two tensor factors: t(u v) = v u.

13 Clearly the ground states of the ferromagnetic model are the eigenvectors with smallest eigenvalue of the operator H Λ = x y =1,x,y Λ t xy Consider Λ as a graph with N vertices x Λ and E edges (xy) given by the nearest neighbor pairs. Theorem Suppose Λ considered as a graph is connected. Then, the smallest eigenvalue of H Λ is E and its eigenspace has dimension N + 1 and consist of all vectors symmetric under permutations of the vertices. 14 Proof Let {e, e + } be an o.n. basis of C 2, and λ 0 (A) the smallest eigenvalue of a matrix A. Observation 1) For any Hermitian operators, λ 0 (A + B) λ 0 (A) + λ 0 (B). (For any hermitian matrix the lowest eigenvalue satisfies the variational principle λ 0 (A) = inf ψ 0 A φ. Thus λ 0 (A + B) = inf ψ 0 A + B ψ, while for any ψ, A + B ψ = A ψ + B ψ λ 0 (A) + λ 0 (B), which proves the observation.) Apply this to H to obtain λ 0 ( H) E. Observation 2) H( e + ) = E e + x Λ x Λ which implies that λ 0 (H) does equal E.

15 Observation 3) If λ 0 (A + B) = λ 0 (A) + λ 0 (B) then (A + B)φ = λ 0 (A + B) implies Aφ = λ 0 (A)φ and Bφ = λ 0 (B)φ. (For a hermitian matrix A, ψ is an eigenvector for λ 0 (A) iff A ψ = λ 0 (A). Now suppose λ 0 (A + B) = λ 0 (A) + λ 0 (B) and φ is a ground state for A + B. Then A φ + B φ = A + B φ = λ 0 (A + B) = λ 0 (A) + λ 0 (B) Also, A φ λ 0 (A) and B φ λ 0 (B). So we have A φ = λ 0 (A) and B φ = λ 0 (B). And this implies Aφ = λ 0 (A)φ and Bφ = λ 0 (B)φ.) Apply this to determine Hφ = Eφ only if t xy φ = φ for all (xy) Λ. 16 Observation 4) If Λ is a connected graph then any permutation of its vertices, π, can be written as a product of transpositions τ xy where (xy) is an edge in the graph. Apply this to deduce that for any ground state φ, U π φ = φ for all permutations π, where U π is the unitary determined by its action on simple tensors: U π (v 1 v N ) = v π1 v πn

17 So, all ground states have to be permutation-invariant vectors, and vice-versa if U π φ = φ for all π then t xy φ = φ for all x, y (because t xy = U τxy ). An o.n. basis of permutation invariant vectors is given by ψ k = 1 U π ((e e ) (e N! }{{} + e + )) }{{} π Perm(Λ) k N k for k = 0, 1,, N. This is also the maximum spin irreducible representation contained in x Λ D (1/2). More about that later. 18 (Let G be the group generated by {τ xy : (xy) Λ}. Prove by induction that τ xy G for all i and j, vertices in Λ. Induction is on d(x, y) = min{n : (xx 2 ), (x 2 x 3 ),..., (x n 1 y) Λ} For d(x, y) = 0 it is trivial that τ xx = id G. For the induction step assume that τ xy G whenever d(x, y) n. If d(x, y) = n + 1 let x 2,, x n be a sequence s.t. (xx 2 ),..., (x n y) Λ. Then τ xxn, τ xny G by the induction hypothesis. So τ xy = τ xnyτ xxn τ xny G. Since the permutation group is generated by all transpositions, G = Perm({x : x Λ}).)