YONGDO LIM. 1. Introduction

Similar documents
AN EXTENDED MATRIX EXPONENTIAL FORMULA. 1. Introduction

Recursive Solutions of the Matrix Equations X + A T X 1 A = Q and X A T X 1 A = Q

The iterative methods for solving nonlinear matrix equation X + A X 1 A + B X 1 B = Q

Norm inequalities related to the matrix geometric mean

The matrix arithmetic-geometric mean inequality revisited

On matrix equations X ± A X 2 A = I

On the Hermitian solutions of the

RIEMANNIAN AND FINSLER STRUCTURES OF SYMMETRIC CONES

ISOLATED SEMIDEFINITE SOLUTIONS OF THE CONTINUOUS-TIME ALGEBRAIC RICCATI EQUATION

ELA

PERTURBATION ANAYSIS FOR THE MATRIX EQUATION X = I A X 1 A + B X 1 B. Hosoo Lee

Ann. Funct. Anal. 5 (2014), no. 2, A nnals of F unctional A nalysis ISSN: (electronic) URL:

Kantorovich type inequalities for ordered linear spaces

Banach Journal of Mathematical Analysis ISSN: (electronic)

Singular Value Inequalities for Real and Imaginary Parts of Matrices

The Metric Geometry of the Multivariable Matrix Geometric Mean

THE NEARLY ADDITIVE MAPS

QUADRATIC MAJORIZATION 1. INTRODUCTION

The symmetric linear matrix equation

Some Properties of the Augmented Lagrangian in Cone Constrained Optimization

u(0) = u 0, u(1) = u 1. To prove what we want we introduce a new function, where c = sup x [0,1] a(x) and ɛ 0:

Singular Value and Norm Inequalities Associated with 2 x 2 Positive Semidefinite Block Matrices

On (T,f )-connections of matrices and generalized inverses of linear operators

Regular operator mappings and multivariate geometric means

CORACH PORTA RECHT INEQUALITY FOR CLOSED RANGE OPERATORS

ENTANGLED STATES ARISING FROM INDECOMPOSABLE POSITIVE LINEAR MAPS. 1. Introduction

Analytical formulas for calculating extremal ranks and inertias of quadratic matrix-valued functions and their applications

Improvements on Geometric Means Related to the Tracy-Singh Products of Positive Matrices

SINGULAR VALUE INEQUALITIES FOR COMPACT OPERATORS

Wavelets and Linear Algebra

NON POSITIVELY CURVED METRIC IN THE SPACE OF POSITIVE DEFINITE INFINITE MATRICES

Solution Methods. Richard Lusby. Department of Management Engineering Technical University of Denmark

Interval solutions for interval algebraic equations

Largest dual ellipsoids inscribed in dual cones

POSITIVE MAP AS DIFFERENCE OF TWO COMPLETELY POSITIVE OR SUPER-POSITIVE MAPS

Interpolating the arithmetic geometric mean inequality and its operator version

Eigenvalue inequalities for convex and log-convex functions

On some positive definite functions

Seul Lee, Dong-Soo Kim and Hyeon Park

IMPROVED METHODS AND STARTING VALUES TO SOLVE THE MATRIX EQUATIONS X ± A X 1 A = I ITERATIVELY

Supplement: Universal Self-Concordant Barrier Functions

ON RIGHT S-NOETHERIAN RINGS AND S-NOETHERIAN MODULES

Legendre surfaces whose mean curvature vectors are eigenvectors of the Laplace operator

Convex Optimization of Graph Laplacian Eigenvalues

Optimization problems on the rank and inertia of the Hermitian matrix expression A BX (BX) with applications

POSITIVE DEFINITE MATRICES AND THE S-DIVERGENCE

On the simplest expression of the perturbed Moore Penrose metric generalized inverse

THE ARITHMETIC, GEOMETRIC AND HARMONIC MEANS IN OPERATOR ALGEBRAS AND TRANSFORMATIONS AMONG THEM

Yongge Tian. China Economics and Management Academy, Central University of Finance and Economics, Beijing , China

AN EFFECTIVE METRIC ON C(H, K) WITH NORMAL STRUCTURE. Mona Nabiei (Received 23 June, 2015)

A Note on the Harmonic Quasiconformal Diffeomorphisms of the Unit Disc

On-Line Geometric Modeling Notes VECTOR SPACES

arxiv: v1 [math.ra] 8 Apr 2016

FUNCTION BASES FOR TOPOLOGICAL VECTOR SPACES. Yılmaz Yılmaz

Riemannian geometry of positive definite matrices: Matrix means and quantum Fisher information

arxiv: v1 [math.fa] 24 Aug 2012

Moore-Penrose Inverse and Operator Inequalities

Abstract. In this article, several matrix norm inequalities are proved by making use of the Hiroshima 2003 result on majorization relations.

Jae Heon Yun and Yu Du Han

Math 241, Exam 1 Information.

Primal-dual relationship between Levenberg-Marquardt and central trajectories for linearly constrained convex optimization

Extremal Characterizations of the Schur Complement and Resulting Inequalities

GENERALIZED POPOVICIU FUNCTIONAL EQUATIONS IN BANACH MODULES OVER A C ALGEBRA AND APPROXIMATE ALGEBRA HOMOMORPHISMS. Chun Gil Park

arxiv: v1 [math.fa] 1 Oct 2015

Positive Solution to a Generalized Lyapunov Equation via a Coupled Fixed Point Theorem in a Metric Space Endowed With a Partial Order

NORM INEQUALITIES FOR THE GEOMETRIC MEAN AND ITS REVERSE. Ritsuo Nakamoto* and Yuki Seo** Received September 9, 2006; revised September 26, 2006

Convergence Analysis of Structure-Preserving Doubling Algorithms for Riccati-Type Matrix Equations

COMMUTATIVITY OF OPERATORS

The principal inverse of the gamma function

Higher rank numerical ranges of rectangular matrix polynomials

Some inequalities for unitarily invariant norms of matrices

ON A CLASS OF OPERATORS RELATED TO PARANORMAL OPERATORS

ELA MAPS PRESERVING GENERAL MEANS OF POSITIVE OPERATORS

The Nearest Doubly Stochastic Matrix to a Real Matrix with the same First Moment

On Quasi Quadratic Functionals and Existence of Related Sesquilinear Functionals

On some properties of T 0 ordered reflection

Two Results About The Matrix Exponential

MATH 423 Linear Algebra II Lecture 33: Diagonalization of normal operators.

Using Schur Complement Theorem to prove convexity of some SOC-functions

APPENDIX A. Background Mathematics. A.1 Linear Algebra. Vector algebra. Let x denote the n-dimensional column vector with components x 1 x 2.

MODULUS OF CONTINUITY OF THE DIRICHLET SOLUTIONS

c 1998 Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics

ON QUASI-ZERO DIVISOR GRAPHS OF NON-COMMUTATIVE RINGS. Communicated by S. Alikhani

A sensitivity result for quadratic semidefinite programs with an application to a sequential quadratic semidefinite programming algorithm

A priori bounds on the condition numbers in interior-point methods

ON POSITIVE SEMIDEFINITE PRESERVING STEIN TRANSFORMATION

Applied Math Qualifying Exam 11 October Instructions: Work 2 out of 3 problems in each of the 3 parts for a total of 6 problems.

Linear Algebra and Matrix Inversion

MCS 563 Spring 2014 Analytic Symbolic Computation Friday 31 January. Quotient Rings

Journal of Inequalities in Pure and Applied Mathematics

Operators with numerical range in a closed halfplane

Iterative Solution of a Matrix Riccati Equation Arising in Stochastic Control

and the compositional inverse when it exists is A.

Multivariable Calculus

LOCAL FIXED POINT THEORY INVOLVING THREE OPERATORS IN BANACH ALGEBRAS. B. C. Dhage. 1. Introduction

AN ELEMENTARY PROOF OF THE GROUP LAW FOR ELLIPTIC CURVES

The Hermitian R-symmetric Solutions of the Matrix Equation AXA = B

An Iterative Procedure for Solving the Riccati Equation A 2 R RA 1 = A 3 + RA 4 R. M.THAMBAN NAIR (I.I.T. Madras)

Moore-Penrose-invertible normal and Hermitian elements in rings

Semidefinite Programming

Transcription:

THE INVERSE MEAN PROBLEM OF GEOMETRIC AND CONTRAHARMONIC MEANS YONGDO LIM Abstract. In this paper we solve the inverse mean problem of contraharmonic and geometric means of positive definite matrices (proposed in []) A = X + Y (X 1 + Y 1 ) 1 B = X#Y by proving its equivalence to the well-known nonlinear matrix equation X = T BX 1 B where T = 1 (A+A#(A+8BA 1 B)) is the unique positive definite solution of X = A + BX 1 B. The inverse mean problem is solvable if and only if B A. 1. Introduction In [] Anderson and coauthors have introduced a natural matrix generalization of the contraharmonic mean of scalars (a + b )/(a + b) and studied related fixed point and least squares problems on positive semidefinite matrices. The contraharmonic mean C(A, B) of positive definite matrices A and B is defined by C(A, B) = A + B (A 1 + B 1 ) 1. Inverse mean problems involving the contraharmonic mean are considered and answered for the problem of contraharmonic and arithmetric means in [] where the inverse mean problem of contraharmonic and geometric means is proposed even for the scalar version. The geometric mean A#B of positive definite matrices A and B is defined by A#B = A 1/ (A 1/ BA 1/ ) 1/ A 1/ and is well-known in theory of matrix inequalities (cf. [4], [5], [6], [15]) and appears in semidefinite programming (scaling point, [0]) and in geometry (geodesic middle, [16], [8], [18]). Although the inverse mean problem occurs on positive semidefinite matrices A and B, we restrict our attention to the positive definite case. Similar questions on geometric, arithmetic and harmonic means are answered in [3]. 1

YONGDO LIM The inverse mean problem of contraharmonic and geometric means is to find positive definite matrices X and Y for the system of nonlinear matrix equations: A = C(X, Y ) (1.1) B = X#Y where A and B are given positive definite matrices of same size. The main result of this paper is that the inverse mean problem (1.1) is equivalent to a system of the well-known nonlinear matrix equations (Theorem.3): X = A + BX 1 B (1.) Y = X BY 1 B. The matrix equations X = Q + A X 1 A and X = Q A X 1 A with Q positive definite have been studied recently by several authors (see [1], [9], [10], [11], [1], [14], [17], [19], [1], []). For the application areas where the equations arise, see the references given in [1] and [1]. In section 3, we compute an explicit solution T of the first equation X = A + BX 1 B of (1.) and then assert that the inverse mean problem is equivalent to the matrix equation X = T BX 1 B. Solving directly the matrix equation X = T BX 1 B we conclude that the inverse mean problem is solvable if and only if B T, equivalently B A (Theorem 3.3). Extreme solutions of the inverse mean problem are also discussed.. The inverse mean problem The following characterization and properties of the geometric mean are wellknown. See [4], [5], [13], [18], and [7] for multivariable geometric means. Lemma.1. (The Riccati Lemma) The geometric mean A#B of positive definite matrices A and B is the unique positive definite solution of the Riccati equation XA 1 X = B.

INVERSE MEAN PROBLEM 3 Furthermore, the geometric mean operation has the following properties: (i) A#B = B#A, (ii) (A#B) 1 = A 1 #B 1, (iii) M(A#B)M = (MAM )#(MBM ) for any nonsingular matrix M, (iv) A #B A#B whenever A A and B B where A B means that B A is positive semidefinite. For given positive definite matrices A and B, the inverse mean problem (1.1) of contraharmonic and geometric means is said to be solvable if there exist positive definite matrices X and Y satisfying the equations of the problem, and in this case the pair (X, Y ) is called a solution of the problem. One immediately sees that solutions of the inverse mean problem do not depend on the order from the commutativity of the contraharmonic and geometric means. That is, if (X, Y ) is a solution of (1.1) then so is (Y, X). By the Riccati Lemma, the second equation of (1.1) is solved in terms of X: B = X#Y implies Y = BX 1 B. Thus the inverse mean problem (1.1) can be alternatively written as A = C(X, Y ) (.3) Y = BX 1 B. The matrix (X 1 + Y 1 ) 1 in the first equation of (1.1) or in the contraharmonic mean C(X, Y ) is known as the parallel addition of X and Y, and has an alternative expression useful for optimal control theory and algebraic Riccati equations (cf. []): (X 1 + Y 1 ) 1 = X X(X + Y ) 1 X. But, the following expression looks new and will be crucial for our approach. Lemma.. For positive definite matrices X and Y, (X 1 + Y 1 ) 1 = (X#Y )(X + Y ) 1 (X#Y ). Proof. The Riccati Lemma implies that X 1 = (Y 1 #X 1 )Y (Y 1 #X 1 ) Y 1 = (X 1 #Y 1 )X(X 1 #Y 1 ).

4 YONGDO LIM It then follows from the commutative and inversion properties of the geometric mean (Lemma.1) X 1 = (X#Y ) 1 Y (X#Y ) 1 Y 1 = (X#Y ) 1 X(X#Y ) 1 and therefore (X 1 + Y 1 ) = (X#Y ) 1 (X + Y )(X#Y ) 1. Taking the inverses of the both sides leads (X 1 + Y 1 ) 1 = (X#Y )(X + Y ) 1 (X#Y ). Theorem.3. The inverse mean problem (1.1) is equivalent to the system of nonlinear matrix equations X = A + BX 1 B (.4) Y = X BY 1 B. More precisely, if we denote S and T by the solution sets of the system (1.1) and (.4), respectively, then the maps Φ : S T, Φ(X, Y ) = (X + Y, X) Ψ : T S, Ψ(X, Y ) = (Y, X Y ) are bijective and S 1 = T. Proof. Suppose that (X, Y ) S. That is, X and Y are positive definite matrices so that A = X + Y (X 1 + Y 1 ) 1, B = X#Y. Setting S := X and T := X + Y, we have S = X = T Y (.3) = T BX 1 B = T BS 1 B.

INVERSE MEAN PROBLEM 5 The equation A = C(X, Y ) = X + Y (X 1 + Y 1 ) 1 of (1.1) leads to T = X + Y = A + (X 1 + Y 1 ) 1 Lemma(.) = A + (X#Y )(X + Y ) 1 (X#Y ) = A + BT 1 B. Therefore, (T, S) = (X + Y, X) is a solution of (.4). Conversely, suppose that (X, Y ) is a solution of (.4). That is, X and Y are positive definite matrices so that Put T := Y and S := X Y. Then X = A + BX 1 B and (.5) Y = X BY 1 B. (.6) X = S + Y = S + T. (.7) It then follows from (.6) that S = X Y = BY 1 B > 0 and then by the Riccati Lemma The equation (.5) X = A + BX 1 B leads to B = S#Y = S#T. (.8) A = X BX 1 B (.7),(.8) = (T + S) (S#T )(T + S) 1 (S#T ) Lemma(.) = (T + S) (T 1 + S 1 ) 1 = C(S, T ). Therefore, (T, S) = (Y, X Y ) is a solution of the inverse mean problem (1.1). It is obvious to see that the maps Φ and Ψ are bijective and S 1 = T. Remark.4. If (X, Y ) is a solution of (.4) then (Y, BY 1 B) is a solution of (1.1) and (Y, BY 1 B) = (Y, X Y ). Indeed, Y = X BY 1 B implies that X Y = BY 1 B.

6 YONGDO LIM 3. Solvability In this section we give a complete answer for the inverse mean problem (1.1) by solving the equivalent system of matrix equations (.4) in Theorem.3. First, we solve the first equation X = A + BX 1 B in (.4). The uniqueness and existence of a positive definite solution of the matrix equation X = A + BX 1 B appear in (Proposition 4.1, [1]). However, we compute it explicitly in terms of geometric means. Proposition 3.1. Let A and B be positive definite matrices. Then the nonlinear matrix equation X = A + BX 1 B has the unique positive definite solution X = 1(A + A#(A + 4BA 1 B)). Proof. By setting Y = A 1/ XA 1/ and C = A 1/ BA 1/, we observe that the matrix equation X = A + BX 1 B is equivalent to Y = I + CY 1 C. (3.9) By Lemma.1 the equation (3.9) means that C = Y #(Y I) = (Y Y ) 1/ and hence Y Y C = 0. This equation has a unique positive definite solution defined as Y = 1 (I + (I + 4C ) 1/ ) = 1 (I + I#(I + 4C )). Therefore again by Lemma.1 the equation (3.9) has a unique positive definite solution X = 1 (A + A#(A + 4BA 1 B)). Proposition 3.. The inverse mean problem (1.1) is equivalent to the nonlinear matrix equation X = T BX 1 B where T = 1 (A+A#(A+8BA 1 B)). In particular, if X is a positive definite solution of X = T BX 1 B then (X, BX 1 B) = (X, T X) is a solution of the inverse mean problem (1.1).

INVERSE MEAN PROBLEM 7 Proof. By Proposition 3.1, the nonlinear equation X = A + BX 1 B of the system (.4) has the unique positive definite solution T = 1 (A + A#(A + 8BA 1 B)) and therefore (.4) and hence (1.1) is equivalent to the single matrix equation X = T BX 1 B. If X is a positive solution of X = T BX 1 B then (T, X) is a solution of (.4) and hence Ψ(T, X) = (X, T X) = (X, BX 1 B) is a solution of the inverse mean problem (1.1) by Theorem.3 and Remark.4. The solvability criterion of the matrix equation X = T BX 1 B (3.10) in Proposition 3. appeared in Anderson-Morley-Trapp (Theorem 4., [1]) and Engwerda [10]: (3.10) has a positive definite solution if and only if ( ) T/ B 0, B T/ and it is well-known that this ( requirement ) is equivalent to T/ B. Indeed for A B positive definite A and B, 0 if and only if A BA 1 B (Lemma 3.3, B A [18]) if and only if B 1/ AB 1/ B 1/ A 1 B 1/ if and only if B 1/ AB 1/ I if and only if A B. We also have a direct proof of solvability of (3.10) as follows. Positive definite solvability of (3.10) is equivalent to solvability of the equation (T X)#X = B with a side condition T > X > 0. With transforms Z = T 1/ XT 1/ and D = T 1/ BT 1/ this is equivalent to solvability of the equation, with a side condition I > Z > 0, (I Z)#Z = (Z Z ) 1/ = D or Z Z + D = 0. (3.11) It is immediate that the solvability in the last form is I D 0. Therefore we can conclude that positive definite solvability of the original equation is T B. Theorem 3.3. The inverse mean problem (1.1) is solvable if and only if B A. In this case (X +, Y + ), defined as

8 YONGDO LIM X + 1 (T + T #(T 4BT 1 B)) = 1 (T + (T + B)#(T B)), Y + 1 (T T #(T 4BT 1 B)) = 1 (T (T + B)#(T B)) where T = 1 (A + A#(A + 8BA 1 B)), is the extreme solution in the sense that X X + and Y + Y for all solutions (X, Y ) of (1.1). Proof. By Theorem.3 and Proposition 3.1 we have to consider the solvability of the matrix equation Y = T BY 1 B with T = 1 (A + A#(A + 8BA 1 B)). But this is the case if and only if B T, equivalently 4B A + A#(A + 8BA 1 B). Let C = B 1/ AB 1/. Then by Lemma.1 the above inequality becomes 4I C + C#(C + 8C 1 ) = C + (C + 8I) 1/. (3.1) It is straightforward to see 4 λ + λ + 8 (λ > 0) λ 1. Hence the inequality (3.1) is equivalent to I C, hence to B A. Now the equation X = T BX 1 B (3.13) is equivalent to the equation (3.11) Z Z + D = 0 (3.14) where Z = T 1/ XT 1/ and D = T 1/ BT 1/. Since B T is equivalent to 4D I, the maximum and the minimum solution of (3.14) are respectively Z + = 1 (I + (I 4D ) 1/ ) = 1 (I + (I + D)#(I D)) and Z = 1 (I (I 4D ) 1/ ) = 1 (I (I + D)#(I D)).

INVERSE MEAN PROBLEM 9 Therefore again by Lemma.1 the maximum and the minimum solutions of (3.13) are respectively X + 1 (T + T #(T 4BT 1 B)) = 1 (T + (T + B)#(T B)) and X 1 (T T #(T 4BT 1 B)) = 1 (T (T + B)#(T B)). Since X = T X +, the assertion on the extremity follows from Theorem.3. Remark 3.4. The simple condition A B is very natural in the sense that it corresponds to the fact that twice of the arithmetic mean is larger than the sum of the geometric and harmonic means: If (X, Y ) is a solution of (1.1) then A B = A(X, Y ) H(X, Y ) (X#Y ) = (A(X, Y ) X#Y ) + (A(X, Y ) H(X, Y )) where A(X, Y ) and H(X, Y ) are the arithmetic and harmonic means of X and Y. The arithmetic-geometric-harmonic mean inequality A(X, Y ) X#Y H(X, Y ) implies that A B. Acknowledgements. The author is very grateful to the referees for many points to improve the paper, particularly on Theorem 3.3 and Remark 3.4. References [1] W. N. Anderson, T. D. Morley and G. E. Trapp, Positive solutions to X = A BX 1 B, Linear Algebra Appl. 134 (1990), 53-6. [] W. N. Anderson, M. E. Mays, T. D. Morley and G. E. Trapp, The contraharmonic mean of HSD matrices, SIAM J. Alg. Disc. Meth. 8 (1987), 674-68. [3] W. N. Anderson and G. E. Trapp, Inverse problems for means of matrices, SIAM J. Alg. Disc. Meth. 7 (1986), 188-19. [4] T. Ando, Topics on Operator Inequalities, Lecture Notes Hokkaido Univ., Sapporo, 1978. [5], Concavity of certain maps on positive definite matrices and applications to Hadamard products, Linear Alg. and Appl. 6 (1979) 03-41. [6], On the arithmetic-geometric-harmonic-mean inequalities for positive definite matrices, Linear Algebra and Its Applications 5/53 (1983), 31 37.

10 YONGDO LIM [7] T. Ando, C-H. Li, and R. Mathias, Geometric means, Linear Algebra Appl. 385 (004), 305-334. [8] G. Corach, H. Porta, and L. Recht, Geodesics and operator means in the space of positive operators, International J. of Math. 4 (1993), 193-0. [9] S. M. El-sayed and A. C. M. Ran, On an iteration method for solving a class of nonlinear matrix equations, SIAM J. Matrix Ana. Appl. 3 (00), 63-645. [10] J. C. Engwerda, On the existence of a positive definite solution of the matrix equation X + A T X 1 A = I, Linear Algebra Appl. 194 (1993), 91-108. [11] J. C. Engwerda, A. C. M. Ran, and A. L. Rijkeboer, Necessary and sufficient conditions for the existence of a positive definite solution of the matrix equation X + A X 1 A = Q, Linear Algebra Appl. 186 (1993), 55-75. [1] A. Ferrante and B. Levy, Hermitian solutions of the equation X = Q + NX 1 N, Linear Algebra Appl. 47 (1996), 359-373. [13] M. Fiedler and V. Pták, A new positive definite geometric mean of two positive definite matrices, Linear Algebra and Its Applications 51 (1997), 1-0. [14] C.-H. Guo and P. Lancaster, Iterative solution of two matrix equations, Math. Comp. 68 (1999), 1589-1603. [15] F. Kubo and T. Ando, Means of positive linear operators, Math. Ann. 46 (1980), 05-4. [16] S. Lang, Fundamentals of differential geometry, Graduate Texts in Mathematics 191, Springer- Verlag, New York, 1999. [17] X. Liu and H. Gao, On the positive definite solutions of the matrix equations X s ± A T X t A = I n, Linear Algebra Appl. 368 (003), 83-97. [18] J. D. Lawson and Y. Lim, The geometric mean, matrices, metrics, and more, Amer. Math. Monthly 108 (001), 797-81. [19] B. Meini, Efficient computation of the extreme solutions of X + A X 1 A = Q and X A X 1 A = Q, Math. Comp. 71 (00), 1189-104. [0] Yu. E. Nesterov and M.J. Todd, Self-scaled barriers and interior-point methods for convex programming, Mathematics of Operations Research (1997), 1-4. [1] A. C. M. Ran and M. C. B. Reurings, On the nonlinear matrix equation X + A F(X)A = Q: solutions and perturbation theory, Linear Algebra Appl. 346 (00), 15-6. [] X. Zhan and J. Xie, On the matrix equation X + A T X 1 A = I, Linear Algebra Appl. 47 (1996), 337-345. Department of Mathematics, Kyungpook National University, Taegu 70-701, Korea E-mail address: ylim@knu.ac.kr