Biological Forum An International Journal 8(2): (2016)

Similar documents
International Journal of Science, Environment and Technology, Vol. 6, No 2, 2017,

1(1): 1-6(2015) (Published by Research Trend, Website: ISSN NO. (Print): ISSN NO. (Online):

TRICHO-TAXONOMIC STUDY OF GUARD HAIRS OF THREE SPECIES OF BOVIDAE OF SAURASHTRA REGION OF GUJARAT, INDIA

Refined techniques for the analysis of Asiatic lion Panthera leo persica scats

MORPHOLOGICAL HAIR IDENTIFICATION KEY OF COMMON MAMMALS IN TURKEY

CLASS XI BIOLOGY NOTES CHAPTER 1: LIVING WORLD

Finding Order in Diversity

Introduction to Part III Examining wildlife distributions and abundance using boat surveys

Creating an e-flora for South Africa

Finding Order in Diversity

Natural History of Exotic Mammals

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CONSERVATION SCIENCE

Phylogenetic diversity and conservation

Hair identification key of wild and domestic ungulates from southern Europe

Prey abundance and food habit of tigers (Panthera tigris tigris) in Pench National Park, Madhya Pradesh, India

Identification of Sri Lankan Muroid Rodents using Hair Anatomy

Morphological Markers Related to Sex Expression in Papaya (Carica papaya L.)

Class XI Chapter 1 The Living World Biology


NCERT MULTIPLE-CHOICE QUESTIONS. 1. Which of the following countries has the highest biodiversity? a. Brazil b. South Africa c. Russia d.

PAWS Science Grade 4 Released Items With Data Life Systems

Lesson Overview 4.2 Niches and Community Interactions

Climate Change Vulnerability Assessment for Species

Environmental Science. Teacher Copy

How does variation in niche act as a basis for natural selection?

ASSESSING SEXUAL SEGREGATION IN DEER

ESM: S1: Table of colour patterns and ecological traits, their definitions, measures used and possible values

NATIONAL WORKSHOP ON APPLICATIONS OF NON-INVASIVE TECHNOLOGY TO WILDLIFE ENDOCRINE ASSESSMENT

FACULTY OF LIFE SCIENCES

Chapter Niches and Community Interactions

1 29 g, 18% Potato chips 32 g, 23% 2 30 g, 18% Sugar cookies 35 g, 30% 3 28 g, 19% Mouse food 27 g, 18%

A Geo-Statistical Approach for Crime hot spot Prediction

Climate Change and Arctic Ecosystems

Trait-based Australian mammal distribution patterns and extinction risks

EFFECT OF TEMPERATURE ON OXYGEN CONSUMPTION OF THE MOUSE, Mus musculus

Biology 2201 Unit Test Holy Spirit High Mr. Pretty Name: ANSWER KEY

SPACING OF RURAL SETTLEMENTS IN NAGAUR DISTRICT, RAJASTHAN: A SPATIAL ANALYSIS

FIRST REPORT OF CEROPEGIA BULBOSA ROXB. FROM COASTAL HABITAT OF KULABA FORT, ALIBAG, MAHARASHTRA

Wildlife A Map Colouring Book Map Colouring Books 2

1.0 Forest Ecology at the Ecosystem Level

Finding Order in Diversity

Pangolins. Guidelines and Sampling Protocols. For. Confiscations

Monthly Overview. Rainfall

Background: Why Is Taxonomy Important?

Advt. No. YVJ/WII/T. CELL/APNT/2016/196

SEASONAL VARIATION OF PREY DENSITY OF LARGE PREDATORS IN SATKOSIA TIGER RESERVE, ANGUL, ODISHA, INDIA

Cambridge International Examinations Cambridge International General Certificate of Secondary Education

CHAPTER VI GENERAL CONCLUSION

Groups of organisms living close enough together for interactions to occur.

Principles of Ecology

IUCN Red List Process. Cormack Gates Keith Aune

How Communities Evolve

Finding Order in Diversity

CH. 18 Classification

A Guide to Life on Earth

ICRP & Alliance, Integrated Protection of People and the Environment

A guide to SIMS targeting in difficult samples. WiscSIMS. Department of Geoscience University of Wisconsin-Madison

Monitoring tigers: Any monitoring program is a compromise between science and logistic constraints - Hutto & Young ! Vast landscape low density,

Chapter 26. Phylogeny and the Tree of Life. Lecture Presentations by Nicole Tunbridge and Kathleen Fitzpatrick Pearson Education, Inc.

Salamanders. Jefferson Complex

1) Which of the following describes the mammals, fish, birds, and plants that live in an environment? a) Abiotic c) biome b) population d) biotic

Evolution and Biodiversity 5.3- Classification and Biodiversity

Relationship between weather factors and survival of mule deer fawns in the Peace Region of British Columbia

WEBINAR AGENDA. Review of connectivity mapping progress to date. Describe draft methodology for delineating and validating core areas

Steppe Forward 2013 Field Course: Camera Trapping For Biodiversity Monitoring Information Pack

International Journal of Computing and Business Research (IJCBR) ISSN (Online) : APPLICATION OF GIS IN HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT

A three-step cleaning methodology to remove the yellowing of the Carrara marble in Oslo Opera House

Are these organisms. animals or not?

Classification Revision Pack (B2)

Pollen fertility Vs Spikelet fertility in F2 of a CMS based hybrids in rice (Oryza sativa L.) under Aerobic condition

PENNSYLVANIA. All living things need to interact in an ecosystem in order to survive.

Ridgeley Formation Pulpit Rock Weathering Rinds: Thickness of the Rind Compared to the Altitude and Location on the Formation

Classification of organisms. The grouping of objects or information based on similarities Taxonomy: branch of biology that classifies organisms

GCSE 4781/01 SCIENCE B UNIT 1: Space, Energy and Life FOUNDATION TIER

EL NINO-SOUTHERN OSCILLATION (ENSO): RECENT EVOLUTION AND POSSIBILITIES FOR LONG RANGE FLOW FORECASTING IN THE BRAHMAPUTRA-JAMUNA RIVER

VicForests Pre-harvest Fauna Surveys

CLASSIFICATION. Finding Order in Diversity

Home Range Size and Body Size

Chapter 6 Vocabulary. Environment Population Community Ecosystem Abiotic Factor Biotic Factor Biome

REDESCRIPTION OF DORYPHORIBIUS VIETNAMENSIS (IHAROS, 1969) (TARDIGRADA) COMB. NOV. ON THE BASIS OF THE HOLOTYPE AND ADDITIONAL MATERIAL FROM CHINA

5 th Grade Ecosystems Mini Assessment Name # Date. Name # Date

NATIONAL ACTION PLAN FOR POLAR BEAR CONSERVATION IN THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION. Meeting of the Parties to the Agreement on the Conservation of Polar Bear

How Biological Diversity Evolves

Animal Sound Archives and Zoological Museums

Community Structure. Community An assemblage of all the populations interacting in an area

WEATHER, CLIMATE AND ADAPTATIONS OF ANIMALS TO CLIMATE

Monthly Overview. Rainfall

Tolerance. Tolerance. Tolerance 10/22/2010

CS 4495 Computer Vision Binary images and Morphology

DOUBLE INTEGRAL REPRESENTATION AND CERTAIN TRANSFORMATIONS FOR BASIC APPELL FUNCTIONS

The Atlas Aspect of the Atlas of Living Australia

RESULTS: ASSESSMENT OF UNGULATE-HABITAT RELATIONS

IDENTIFICATION OF DORSAL GUARD HAIRS OF NINE INDIAN SPECIES OF THE FAMILY VIVERRIDAE (CARNIVORA: MAMMALIA)

Unit Two: Biodiversity. Chapter 4

Need for systematics. Applications of systematics. Linnaeus plus Darwin. Approaches in systematics. Principles of cladistics

Marsh Club-moss Lycopodiella inundatum at Stedham and Iping Commons Graeme Lyons January 2013

0610 BIOLOGY. 0610/62 Paper 6 (Alternative to Practical), maximum raw mark 40

SPECIES IDENTIFICATION OF THAI RICE-FIELD CRAB IN THE LOWER NORTH-EASTERN REGION OF THAILAND

A glimpse on Insect capturing glandular hairs of Plumbago zeylanica Linn. and Plumbago auriculata Lam.

ZOOLOGISCHE MEDEDELINGEN

Transcription:

ISSN No. (Print): 0975-1130 ISSN No. (Online): 2249-3239 Tricho-taxonomic studies for Identification of Indian Cervids, Axis axis (Erxleben, 1777), Axis porcinus Zimmermann, 1780, Muntiacus muntjak Zimmermann, 1780 and Rusa unicolor (Kerr, 1792) (Artiodactyla: Mammalia) by Dorsal Guard Hairs Gaurav Sharma *, M. Kamalakannan, C.K. Manna, ** and Dam Debashree *Zoological Survey of India, M-Block, Prani Vigyan Bhawan, New Alipore, Kolkata-700 053, INDIA ** Department of Zoology, University of Kalyani, Kalyani-741235, West Bengal, INDIA (Corresponding author: Gaurav Sharma drgaurav.zsi.india@gmail.com) (Received 05 August, 2016, Accepted 10 September, 2016) (Published by Research Trend, Website: www.researchtrend.net) ABSTRACT: A combination of characters of hairs of cervids are much required in the field of forensic science and predator diet analysis for species identification. The dorsal guard hairs of four species of Indian cervids i.e. Spotted Deer, Axis axis (Erxleben, 1777), Indian Hog Deer, Axis porcinus Zimmermann, 1780, Barking Deer, Muntiacus muntjak Zimmermann, 1780 and Sambar Deer, Rusa unicolor (Kerr, 1792) were examined using optical light and scanning electron microscopes. Both morphological and microscopic characters of hairs had showed differences among the four species. Based on a combination of characters of dorsal guard hairs, the four cervid species can be identified. Further, this study supports other published hair identification studies, as an appropriate reference of microscopic images and descriptions of hairs of four cervid species presented here for species identity. Key words: forensic science, mammals, illegal trade, morphological and microscopic characters. INTRODUCTION Biological Forum An International Journal 8(2): 162-167(2016) Identification of mammals based on the morphological and microscopic structure of hairs are relatively significant in the study of mammalian identification along with diet-ecology and control of illegal trade of wildlife and its derivatives. While general morphology alone is not suitable for accurate identification, details of hair structure based on a combination of characters (morphological & microscopic) are helpful in the identification of species (Stains 1958; Brunner & Coman 1974; Koppikar & Sabins 1976; Teerink 1991; Chakraborty & De 2010; Sahajpal et al. 2010). Identification of hairs of some ungulates have been carried out by Gopal et al. (1993, Hard -ground Barasingha); Chatterjee et al. (2005, Yak); Bahuguna & Mukherjee (2000, Tibetan Antelope); Bahuguna et al. (2010, selected carnivores & artiodactyls); Sahajpal et al. (2010, Tibetan Antelope & Capra sp.); Joshi et al. (2012, 4 species of deer); Dharaiya & Soni (2012, cross-section of ungulates). However, a combination of characters for identification of species based on hair characteristics for family Cervidae is more appropriate for species identification. (Brunner & Coman 1974; Teerink 1991). Out of seven cervid species listed in India, four species namely Spotted Deer Axis axis (Erxleben 1777), Hog Deer Axis porcinus (Zimmermann 1780), Barking Deer Muntiacus muntjak (Zimmermann 1780) and Sambar Deer Rusa unicolor (Kerr 1792) were addressed in the present study. All the four species are listed under Schedule III of the Indian Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972. As per the IUCN Red List category, Axis porcinus is Endangered, Rusa unicolor is Vulnerable, Axis axis and Muntiacus muntjak are Least Concern. The present study was carried out to provide a complete combination of characters such as morphological, cuticular, medullary and cross-sectional characteristics of hair with high on images and detailed descriptions using optical light and scanning electron microscopes for the identification of above mentioned four cervid species. MATERIAL AND METHODS The guard hairs were collected from the mid-dorsal region of three dry skins of each species present in the National Zoological Collections, Mammal & Osteology Section, Zoological Survey of India, Kolkata, India. The samples were washed thoroughly with Acetone ((CH₃)₂CO = 58.08) and Carbon tetrachloride (CCl₄ = 153.82) to remove the dirt of exogenous materials. The morphological characters of hairs (n = 20) such as shape, colour, bands were recorded, and total lengths (mm) and diameters (µm) were measured using Dial calliper (Mitutoyo) and optical microscope (Olympus BX41), respectively.

The cuticular characters of hair such as position, patterns, structure of margins and distance between margins and medullary characters such as width composition, structure and form of margins of the medulla, and shape of cross-section of hair were examined under 200 X and 400 X magnification with help of the digital camera fitted on optical microscope (Olympus BX41) and the observed microscopic characters of hair were photographed. To obtain the three dimensional structure and a more detailed examination of cuticular s of hair, the scanning electron microscope (ZEISS Evo18 - Special edition) was used. The cuticular structures of hairs were observed under the high magnification from 1150 to 4080 X and the observed cuticular structures of hairs were photographed. All the measurements of cuticular s were through the optical microscope and the mean values were taken into the consideration for analysis. The methodology and nomenclature of morphological, cuticular, medullary and cross sectional characteristics of dorsal guard hairs were followed according to the descriptions provided by Ridgway (1886); Brunner & Coman (1974); Moore et al. (1974); Teerink (1991); Chakraborty et al. (1995). The description of different terms of patterns used in the results and discussion have been given herewith were followed from the Brunner & Coman (1974); Teerink (1991). Cuticle characteristics: the position of s lie at right angles and their width is greater than their length. wave the pattern of s are non-overlapping, wavy in appearance and usually continuous, with the length of the waves on the same and different s equal. Smooth the structure of margins have no interruptions, irregularities or indentations. Near the distance between the margins of the two consecutive s are neither too close nor too away from each other. Medulla characteristics: Multicellular in rows the medulla is composed of a continuous two or more Sharma, Kamalakannan, Manna, and Debashree 163 columns of cells. Wide aeriform lattice the structure of medulla is filled with air spaces appear as a network or lattice enclosing aggregations of shrunken wide medullary cells. Straight the form of the medulla margins have a smooth and straight line. Scalloped the form of the medulla margins have a series of convex and rounded projections. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION The dorsal guard hairs of the four species studied under family Cervidae can be identified on the basis of following combination of morphological and microscopic characters of dorsal guard hair. (a). Morphological characters The shape of studied species found as straight in both A. axis and A. porcinus, whereas the shape was slightly wavy and undulated between the M. muntjak and R. unicolor respectively. The coat colour of cervids had showed different shades of brown. The dorsal guard hairs of all the four species were unbanded. The mean length of hair significantly varied between two cervids, the R. unicolor (49.8±8.7 mm) had the maximum and the M. muntjak (21.2±3.3 mm) had the minimum length. Similarly, the maximum and minimum of mean diameter of hair were observed in the R. unicolor (89.4±14.7 µm) and M. muntjak (40±6.6 µm), respectively. The mean length and diameter were almost equal in size in the A. axis (length = 29.1±4.7 mm, diameter=84.7±2.9 µm) and A. porcinus (length= 30±5.9 mm; diameter = 87.4±2.4 µm), but they were highest than the M. muntjak and lowest than the R. unicolor (Table 1). The morphological characters of hairs of mammals may differ due to the age, sex, season, climate, geographical variations, etc. However, the shape, colour, length and diameter of dorsal guard hair are presented here may be helpful for the preliminary investigations of hair and can be used as one of the combination of characters of hair for the identification of species. Table 1: Morphological characteristics of the dorsal guard hairs of species. Species Axis axis Axis porcinus Muntiacus muntjak Rusa unicolor Scale position Scale patterns Structure of margins Cuticular characteristics Distance between margins Scale count/mm length of hair Length of cuticular 68-146 (102±13.4) 64.3-83.6 (71±6.8) 96-132 78.1-82.1 (117.2±11.1) (73.5±1.8) 132-168 36.1-42.1 (150.3±11) (38.9±1.7) 65-95 (80±9.3) 69.1-86.1 (79.5±6.3) Width cuticular 8.3-12.4 (10.4±1.2) 8.8-14.1 (11.7±1.1) 7.1-10.6 (9.4±1.9) 11.7-15.2 (12.9±11.9) of

(b). Microscopic characters (i). Cuticular characteristics The cuticular characteristics of the four species studied had showed no variations except the measurements of cuticular s. The position, patterns, structure of margins and distance between margins were as transversal, regular wave, smooth and near, respectively in relation to the longitudinal direction of the hair of all the four species. However, measurement data had showed variations among the species, the count per millimetre mean length of hair was highest in the M. muntjak (150.3±11 µm) and Species Sharma, Kamalakannan, Manna, and Debashree 164 lowest in the R. unicolor (80±9.3 µm), and the A. axis and A. porcinus values were 102±13.4 and 117.2±11.1 µm, respectively. The minimum mean length of cuticular s (38.9±1.7 µm) was observed in the M. muntjak and the maximum (79.5±6.3 µm) was observed in the R. unicolor, whereas the A. axis and A. porcinus values were 71±6.8 and 73.5±1.8 µm, respectively. The mean width of cuticular s of the all the four species were slightly varied: 10.4±1.2 and 11.7±1.1 µm in the A. axis and A. porcinus, respectively, and 9.4±1.9 and 12.9±11.9 µm in the M. muntjak and R. unicolor, respectively (Table 2). Table 2: Cuticular characteristics of the dorsal guard hairs of species. Morphological characteristics Shape Coat colour Colour of dorsal guard No. of bands Length (mm) Axis axis Straight Reddish brown coat with white spots Axis porcinus Muntiacus Slightly Glossy reddish muntjak wavy brown Rusa unicolor Fallow Unbanded 23-35.9 (29.1±4.7) Straight Olive brown Chamoisee Unbanded 21.0-37.6 (30.0±5.9) Sepia Unbanded 14.1-26.1 (21.2±3.3) Undulated Dark brown Camel Unbanded 31.8-60.3 (49.8±8.7) Diameter (µm) 81.1-89.5 (84.7±2.9) 83.4-93.4 (87.4±2.4) 32.1-48.1 (40.0±6.6) 57.1-98.3 (89.4±14.7) (ii). Medullary and Cross-sectional characteristics The width composition of medulla had showed no variations and it was filled with as multicellular in rows in all the four species. The structure of medulla of the species was observed as wide aeriform lattice in both A. axis and M. muntjak and as wide medulla lattice in both A. porcinus and R. unicolor. The form of the medulla margins were as straight in all the species except in the M. muntjak, where it was as scalloped. The shape of cross-section of the species had showed significant variation among the four species. The shape of the cross-section was observed as: oval large medulla in both A. axis and M. muntjak, oval medium medulla in the A. porcinus and biconvex large medulla in the R. unicolor (Table 3). Joshi et al. (2012) have done a comparative hair study on four species of deer namely Moschiola indica, Axis axis, Muntiacus muntjak and Rusa unicolor only on the basis of the hair colour and medulla structures of the species. Dharaiya & Soni (2012) have documented only the transverse sections of hairs of Axis axis and Rusa unicolor in the family Cervidae. Some studies of species under family Cervidae are mainly based on the predator s scat-hair (diet) analysis. Methods of hair identification need exact identification keys (Rajaram & Manon 1975; Dharaiya & Soni 2012). Table 3. Medullary characteristics and cross-section of the dorsal guard hairs of species. Species Medullary characteristics Cross-section Width composition of medulla Structure of medulla Form of medulla margins Shape Axis axis Multicellular in rows Wide aeriform lattice Straight Oval- large medulla Axis porcinus Multicellular in rows Wide medulla lattice Straight Oval- medium medulla Muntiacus muntjak Multicellular in rows Wide aeriform lattice Scalloped Oval-large medulla Rusa unicolor Multicellular in rows Wide medulla lattice Straight Biconvex- large medulla

The single character of hair does not help for the species identification, as the hair characters often show high variance, but the combination of characters may give significant values for identification of species (Brunner & Coman 1974; Teerink 1991). Among the four studied species, both A. axis and A. porcinus had showed having almost similar characters except the coat colour, colour of dorsal guard hair, structure of medulla and shape of cross-section, however, the M. muntjak and R. unicolor showed significant variations in both morphological and microscopic characters of dorsal guard hairs. On the basis of morphological and microscopic characters of dorsal guard hairs, the key characters of hair for the four species studied under the Sharma, Kamalakannan, Manna, and Debashree 165 family Cervidae is presented in Table 1-3 along with microscopic photographs (Figs. 1-16). The four species of cervids studied here such as the A. axis, A. porcinus, M. muntjak and R. unicolor are the deer species highly trafficked in the illegal trade after carnivores, used mainly for local bushmeat consumption, and for their skin and other derivatives. On the other hand, they are chief prey of large carnivores. Therefore, the identification keys along with the microphotographs presented here can be used in animal forensic science as well as the cross-section of hair-structure can be used for predator diet analysis, as an appropriate reference for species identification.

Sharma, Kamalakannan, Manna, and Debashree 166 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The authors convey sincere thanks to Dr. Kailash Chandra, Director, Zoological Survey of India, Kolkata for providing necessary facilities and encouragements. REFERENCES Bahuguna, A. & Mukherjee, S.K. (2000). Use of SEM to recognize Tibetan antelope (Chiru) hair and blending in wool products. Science and Justice, 40, 177 182. Bahuguna, A., Sahajpal, V., Goyal, S.P., Mukherjee, S.K. & Thakur, V. (2010). CD version of forensic guide for identification of selected mammals from primary guard hair. Wildlife Institute of India, Dehradun, India. 438 pp. Brunner, H. & Comman, B. (1974). The Structure of Hairs. Inkata Press, Melbourne, Australia. 170 pp. Chakraborty, R. & De, J.K. (1995). Structure and pattern of cuticular s on mid dorsal guard hairs of marbled cat, Felis marmorata charltoni Gray (Mammalia: Carnivora: Felidae). Records of Zoological Survey India, 95(1-2), 65 70.

Chakraborty, R. & De, J.K. (2010). Atlas on hairs Indian Mammals (Part- I: Carnivora): Published by the Zoological Survey India, Kolkata, India. 141 pp. Chatterjee, A., Raquil, M., Sheikh, I.V. & Bhattacharya, M. (2005). Elemental status in Yak hair. Indian Veterinary Journal 82(5), 526 528. Dharaiya, N. & Soni, V.C. (2012). Identification of hairs of some mammalian prey of large cats in Gir Protected Area, India. Journal of Threatened Taxa 4(9), 2928 2932. Gopal, R., Kotwal, P.C. & Homkar, U. (1993). Hair structure of the hard ground barasingha ( Cervus duuvauceli branderi). My Forest, 29(3), 197 199. Joshi, H.R., Gaikwad, S.A., Tomar, M.P.S. & Shrivastava, K. (2012). Comparative trichology of common wild herbivores of India. Advances in Applied Science Research, 3(6), 3455 3458. Koppiker, B.R. & Sabins, J.H. (1975). Identification of hairs of some Indian mammals. Journal of Bombay Natural History and Society, 73, 5 20. Sharma, Kamalakannan, Manna, and Debashree 167 Moore, T.D., Spence, L.E. & Dugnolle, C.E. (1974). Identification of the dorsal guard hairs of some mammals of Wyoming. Game and Fish Department, Wyoming. 177 pp. Rajaram, A. & Manon, R.K. (19 85). A scanning electron microscopic study of the hair keratin of some animals of the Indian subcontinent - a preliminary report. Journal of the Bombay Natural Society, 83, 427 429. Ridgway, R. (1886). Nomenclature of colours. University Press, John Wilson and Son, Cambridge, 1 129. Sahajibal, V., Goyal, S.P., Singh, K. & Tahkur, V. (2010). Dealing wildlife offences in India: Role of the hair as Physical evidence. International Journal of Trichology, 1(1), 18 26. Stains, H.J. (1958). Field key to guard hair of Middle Western furbearers. Journal of Wildlife Management, 22, 95 97. Teerink, B. J. (1991). Hair of West-European mammals atlas and identification key. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. 223 pp.