Soft Condesnsed Matter : Polymer Dynamics

Similar documents
Part III. Polymer Dynamics molecular models

Polymer Dynamics. Tom McLeish. (see Adv. Phys., 51, , (2002)) Durham University, UK

Polymer Dynamics and Rheology

Polymers Dynamics by Dielectric Spectroscopy

Chemical Engineering 160/260 Polymer Science and Engineering. Lecture 14: Amorphous State February 14, 2001

Polymer dynamics. Course M6 Lecture 5 26/1/2004 (JAE) 5.1 Introduction. Diffusion of polymers in melts and dilute solution.

Chapter 7. Entanglements

Entanglements. M < M e. M > M e. Rouse. Zero-shear viscosity vs. M (note change of slope) Edwards degennes Doi. Berry + Fox, slope 3.4.

Polymer Dynamics. 6. Dilute Solution Dynamic Models. The Rouse Model

Polymer solutions and melts

This is a repository copy of Molecular observation of contour-length fluctuations limiting topological confinement in polymer melts.

Chapter 6: The Rouse Model. The Bead (friction factor) and Spring (Gaussian entropy) Molecular Model:

Supporting Information for. Dynamics of Architecturally Engineered All- Polymer Nanocomposites

QENS in the Energy Domain: Backscattering and Time-of

First-Principles Calculations of Internal Friction of a Gaussian Chain

Anomalous diffusion of a tagged monomer with absorbing boundaries

Chap. 2. Polymers Introduction. - Polymers: synthetic materials <--> natural materials

3.1 Hydrodynamic interactions in a Gaussian chain

Polymer Solution Thermodynamics:

Macromolecular Hydrodynamics Quiz Solutions. (i) To start, we recognize the following relationships on the stress and strain

Polyelectrolyte Solution Rheology. Institute of Solid State Physics SOFT Workshop August 9, 2010

Supplementary information: Applying Polymer. Blend Dynamics Concepts to a Simplified. Industrial System. A Combined Effort by Dielectric Spectroscopy

Rouse chains, unentangled. entangled. Low Molecular Weight (M < M e ) chains shown moving past one another.

Chapter 2 Polymer Physics Concentrated Solutions and Melts

Polymers. Hevea brasiilensis

Physics with Neutrons II, SS2016

Simulation of Coarse-Grained Equilibrium Polymers

CHARGED POLYMERS THE STORY SO FAR

Neutron scattering. Max Wolff. Division for Material Physics Department of Physics and Astronomy Uppsala University Uppsala Sweden

2.1 Traditional and modern applications of polymers. Soft and light materials good heat and electrical insulators

VIII. Rubber Elasticity [B.Erman, J.E.Mark, Structure and properties of rubberlike networks]

Chapter 6 Molten State

Molecular Theories of Linear Viscoelasticity THE ROUSE MODEL (P. 1)

Part 8. Special Topic: Light Scattering

Statistical and hydrodynamic properties of topological polymers for various graphs showing enhanced short-range correlation

Lecture 8. Polymers and Gels

Rouse vs. Zimm Regime: Hydrodynamic Interactions 1, a)

Lecture 5: Macromolecules, polymers and DNA

Structure and linear viscoelasticity of flexible polymer solutions: comparison of polyelectrolyte and neutral polymer solutions

V(φ) CH 3 CH 2 CH 2 CH 3. High energy states. Low energy states. Views along the C2-C3 bond

DIELECTRIC SPECTROSCOPY. & Comparison With Other Techniques

Chapter 5: Molecular Scale Models for Macroscopic Dynamic Response. Fluctuation-Dissipation Theorem:

BROADBAND DIELECTRIC SPECTROSCOPY - BASICS AND SELECTED APPLICATIONS

Small Angle Neutron Scattering in Different Fields of Research. Henrich Frielinghaus

ENAS 606 : Polymer Physics

Lecture 8 Polymers and Gels

The Positive Muon as a Probe in Chemistry. Dr. Iain McKenzie ISIS Neutron and Muon Source STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory

Scattering Techniques in Soft Condensed Matter

Physical Chemistry of Polymers: Entropy, Interactions, and Dynamics

RHEOLOGY OF BRANCHED POLYMERS

Notes. Prediction of the Linear Viscoelastic Shear Modulus of an Entangled Polybutadiene Melt from Simulation and Theory (1) 3π 2 k B T D(T)N (2)

EXAM I COURSE TFY4310 MOLECULAR BIOPHYSICS December Suggested resolution

(Polymer rheology Analyzer with Sliplink. Tatsuya Shoji JCII, Doi Project

Part III. Polymer Dynamics molecular models

Amorphous Polymers: Polymer Conformation Laboratory 1: Module 1

Antonio Faraone. Dept. of Nuclear Engineering, UMD NIST Center for Neutron Research

Concentration inequalities for Feynman-Kac particle models. P. Del Moral. INRIA Bordeaux & IMB & CMAP X. Journées MAS 2012, SMAI Clermond-Ferrand

University of Washington Department of Chemistry Chemistry 453 Winter Quarter 2005

Neutron Spin Echo Spectroscopy

Heterogeneous structure of poly vinyl chloride as the origin of anomalous dynamical behavior

Polymer Simulations with Pruned-Enriched Rosenbluth Method I

Polymer Dynamics in Melts

Physics 562: Statistical Mechanics Spring 2003, James P. Sethna Homework 5, due Wednesday, April 2 Latest revision: April 4, 2003, 8:53 am

X-ray Intensity Fluctuation Spectroscopy. Mark Sutton McGill University

THEORY OF POLYMER DYNAMICS

CROSSOVER FROM UNENTANGLED TO ENTANGLED DYNAMICS: MONTE CARLO SIMULATION OF POLYETHYLENE, SUPPORTED BY NMR EXPERIMENTS. A Dissertation.

DETERMINING ENTANGLEMENT BEHAVIOR OF BRANCHED POLYMERS. Submitted by: Ramnath Ramachandran Date: 10/26/2007

Rudiments of Polymer Physics

Section B. Electromagnetism

The Polymers Tug Back

How can x-ray intensity fluctuation spectroscopy push the frontiers of Materials Science. Mark Sutton McGill University

Models for Single Molecule Experiments

Tools to Characterize and Study Polymers.

This page intentionally left blank

Harnack Inequalities and Applications for Stochastic Equations

Quiz 5 Morphology of Complex Materials

Protein Dynamics, Allostery and Function

Soft Matter and Biological Physics

Sem /2007. Fisika Polimer Ariadne L. Juwono

1 Polymer Characterization

Neutron Scattering 1

INFLUENCE OF MOLECULAR WEIGHT AND ARCHITECTURE ON POLYMER DYNAMICS. A Dissertation. Presented to. The Graduate Faculty of The University of Akron

II.D Scattering and Fluctuations

THE MICROSCALE POLYMER PROCESSING PROJECT Status Report:2007

Supporting Information Conformations of Ring Polystyrenes in Semidilute Solutions and in Linear Polymer Matrices Studied by SANS

MAE 545: Lecture 4 (9/29) Statistical mechanics of proteins

CHARACTERIZATION OF BRANCHED POLYMERS IN SOLUTION (I)

Energy Barriers and Rates - Transition State Theory for Physicists

Viscoelastic Flows in Abrupt Contraction-Expansions

Jacob Klein Science 323, 47, p. 2

Lab Week 4 Module α 3. Polymer Conformation. Lab. Instructor : Francesco Stellacci

Relaxation. Ravinder Reddy

Final Morphology of Complex Materials

arxiv: v1 [cond-mat.soft] 15 Jul 2016

Supplementary Information for Atomistic Simulation of Spinodal Phase Separation Preceding Polymer Crystallization

Neutron Spin-Echo Instruments

Microscopic Picture of Aging in SiO 2 : A Computer Simulation

Direct Rheological Evidence of Monomer Density Reequilibration for Entangled Polymer Melts

G. R. Strobl, Chapter 5 "The Physics of Polymers, 2'nd Ed." Springer, NY, (1997). J. Ferry, "Viscoelastic Behavior of Polymers"

There are 6 parts to this exam. Parts 1-3 deal with material covered since the midterm exam. Part 4-6 cover all course material.

Transcription:

ECNS23 Introductory Course on Neutron Scattering Saint Remy Les Chevreuses 23 Soft Condesnsed Matter : Polymer Dynamics Michael Monkenbusch FZ-Jülich, Institut für Festkörperforschung, IFF, Germany

What means SOFT? 12 11 typical metals 1 rubbery plateau flow In general: high response to weak external perturbations large susceptibilities (linear χ x ) large nonlinear effects caused by small forces

Random Flight & Gaussian Chains Random walk = freely jointed chain R 2 = Nb 2 = 6R 2 g Freely rotating chain R 2 = Nb 2 1 + cosθ 1 cosθ = Nb2 C Scaled random walk Φ(R, N) (3/2πNb 2 ) 3/2 exp 3R2 2Nb 2 T S R = k BTΦ(R, N) = 3k BT R Nb 2 R Gaussian Chain U ({R n }) = 3 2b 2k BT N (R n R n 1 ) 2 n=1 [ ] 3/2 [ 3 Φ(R n R m ) = exp 3(R n R m ) 2 ] 2πb 2 n m 2 n m b 2 From M.Doi and S.F.Edwards, The Theory of Polymer Dynamics

Good solvents & excluded volume Random walks Self-avoiding walks R 2 N R 2 N 2ν ν =.588... 3/5 melts Θ-solvent S(Q ) Q 2 good solvents reluctant to interpenetrate S(Q ) Q 1/ν

Osmotic pressure, Blobs & Scaling Semidilute Solutions Π k B Tc p = 1 + F Π (c/c ) (1) c p = concentration of polymers c = concentration of segments c = overlap concentration Scaling / dimensional analysis: s = c p R 3 g(n) cn 3ν 1 c/c Local density ρ B within a blob of size R B ξ B ρ B N B R 3 B N 1 3ν B equating this to the overall average density: ρ B = ρ = c p N determines the blob size n B c 1/(3ν 1) ( c 1.39 ) ; R B c ν/(3ν 1) ( c.777 ) For c > c we expect Pi = Π(c) only (for s >> 1): Π k B T c ps 1 3ν 1 c 3ν 3ν 1 c B i.e. F/(blob) k B T!

Dilute Semidilute c < c R g 1..8.6 R g =1 I(Q).4.2 ξ ξ=1/3 2 4 6 8 1 Q c > c

Why Neutrons? Scattering lengths b H = 3.739 fm b D = 6.6714 fm b C = 6.646 fm b N = 9.362 fm b O = 5.83 fm Contrast ρ = 1 b i v molecule molecule I ρ 2 = (ρ A ρ B ) 2 Labeling & Contrast matching... and dynamics

Gaussian coil and Rouse dynamics D CM = k BT Nζ S(Q,t) 1..8.6.4.2 ( D CM Q 2 t) e τ= (Debye Fktn.).5.1.2.4.8.16.32.64 1.28 τ = 2.56 τ= (Gauss Fktn.) 1 2 3 Q Scaling plot 1. PEE Homopolymer, T=473K.8. S(Q,t)/S(Q) H H PEE: -[-C--C-]- H n HCH HCH H.6.4.2 Rouse + Diffusion Rouse (N = ) 1 1 2 Q 2 (Wl 4 t) 2

Rousemodell Gaussian chain ζ v D R 3kT l 2 x ζ d r n dt = 3k BT ( r l 2 n+1 2 r n + r n 1 ) + f }{{} n random }{{} k 2 r/ n 2 k = entropy spring Solution: relaxation modes of a linear chain τ p = 1 p 2 t/τ p ~ e de Gennes universal scaling function for long chains: S(q, t) = S(q, ) e D Rq 2t g( q 4 Wl 4 t) Wl 4 = 3k B Tl 2 /ζ

Neutronenspin Spinrotationen π/2 π π/2 Magnetfeld π π/2 Flipper Präzession 1 Probe Präzession 2 π/2 Detektor Analysator 1. Flipper = Stromblattkasten Counts / 3 msec.8.6.4.2 2 2 4 Phase current (4 turns) / A Echoform S(Q,τ)/S(Q) 1..8.6.4.2 Meßkurven 2.5% Polyisoprenlösung 1 2 τ/ns Auswertung von 2 Winkelstellungen Principle of NSE first π/2-flipper: start precession main solenoid I precession 2πN +Φ π-flipper rotation: 2πN Φ sample v v+ v main solenoid II precession 2πN + 2πN Φ + Φ +(2πN + Φ) v/v 2nd π/2-flipper: end precession

Monomerdimensionen nichtuniverselle (lokale) Eigenschaften PIB bei T=47K, Q=.3.4 Å 1 1. S(Q,t) / S(Q).5 Q=.15 ROUSE Q=.2 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1. t / ns S(Q,t) / S(Q).5 Q=.15 INT VISCOSITY Q=.2 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 t / ns Daten: IN11, Zusammenarbeit mit: A. Arbe, J. Colmenero, Universidad del Pais Vasco, San Sebastian, Spanien

REPTATION: virtual tube=topological constraint 1 log[r 2 (t)] 1 2 τ d = 77 µs 1 2 1 4 τ e = 6 ns τ R = 1.6 µs log(t)

REPTATION: virtual tube=topological constraint Coherent scattering from h-labeled chains in a melt of d-labeled chains: S(Q,t > τ e ) S(Q) = (1 F(Q) ) exp t erfc( t/τ ) τ } {{} density fluctuations along the tube + F(Q) [Creep(t/τ d ) const.] Form factor of the virtual tube: F (Q) = exp[ (Qd/6) 2 ]

Polyethylene (PE) 19 g/mol Single chain structure factor from chains in a melt at T=59 K 1. F(Q 1 ) F(Q 2 ) S(Q,t)/S(Q).75.5.25 Q 1 =.3 A 1 Q 2 =.5 A 1 Q 3 =.77 A 1 Q 4 =.96 A 1 Q 5 =.115 A 1 F(Q 3 ) F(Q 4 ) F(Q 5 ) 5 1 15 t / ns tube dimension d = 49Å follows from exploitation of: F(Q) = exp[ (Qd/6) 2 ]

Incoherent scattering: h-pe self-correlation function S inc (Q,t) 1 S inc (Q, t) = exp 1 6 Q2 r 2 (t) r 2 (t) = 6 log [S inc (Q,t)]/Q 2 (?)

τ e 1 ns Free Rouse segmental diffusion (t < τ e ): r 2 (t) = 2 Wl 4 /π t 1 2 (t > τ e ) r 2 (t) locrep = d 2/3(Wl 4 t /π) 1 4 log <r 2 > 1/2 τ e =6 ns 1/4 log t Diffusion along a contorted tube (Fatkullin & Kimmich PRE52,3273(1995)) (t >> τ e ) S inc (Q,t > τ e ) = exp Q4 d 2 72 r 2 (t) 3 erfc Q2 d 6 2 r 2 (t) 3

Incoherent Scattering from PE Resolve coherent/incoherent inconsistency of τ e and d Rouse 1,,75 S inc (Q,t),5,25 Q = 1. nm -1 Q = 1.5 nm -1 Fatk.&Kim., 1-2 1-1 1 1 1 Fourier time t / ns 1 1 Q = 1. nm -1 Doi&Edw. <r 2 (t)> / nm 2 1 Q = 1.5 nm -1 t 1/4 t 1/2 1-2 1-1 1 1 1 Fourier time t / ns Plot in terms of PSEUDO-mean-squared-distance

Modulus due to Rouse chains G(t) = c N k BT p=1 exp( t 2p 2 /τ R ) Re[G(ω)] Im[G(ω)] 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 3 1 4 η ω J e ()η ω 2 ω 1/2 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 3 ω τ R

Rouse Dynamics: Single Chain Scattering I ζ v D R 3kT 2 x l ξ d R n dt k BT b 2 ( R n+1 2 R n + R n 1 ) = f n (t) with f n (t) with f nα (t 1 )f mβ (t 2 ) = 2k B Tξδ nm δ αβ δ(t 1 t 2 ) assuming a continuous index variable n: ξ R n t 3k BT b 2 2 Rn 2 n = f n (t) boundary condition: R n / n n=,n =. X p (t) = 1 N N dn cos( pπn N ) R n (t) yields: 2Nξ X p t + 6k BTπ 2 p 2 Xp = f Nb 2 p (t)

Rouse Dynamics: Single Chain Scattering II Solution: Relaxation modes for p > : X pα (t)x qβ (t) = δ αβ δ pq k B T τ R = ξn 2 b 2 /(3π 2 k B T). Nb 2 p2 exp( t ) 3k B T2πp2 τ R Mode p = center-of-mass diffusion: X α (t)x β () = δ αβ 2k B T Nξ t S(Q, t) = N Scattering Function: n,m=1 exp[i Q ( R n (t) R m (t))] Gaussian chain! averages analytically exp[iq ( R n (t) R m (t))] = exp[ 1 2 α=x,y,z Q2 α (R nα (t) R mα (t)) 2 ] = exp[ 1 1 23 Q2 ( R n (t) R m (t)) 2 ] }{{} Φ nm (t) S(Q, t) = 1 N exp( 1 n,m 6 Q2 Φ nm (t)) (2)

Rouse Dynamics: Single Chain Scattering III S(Q, t) = 1 N n,m exp( 1 6 Q2 Φ nm (t)) (1) the rms distance: Φ nm (t) = Φ D (t) + Φ nm + Φ 1 nm(t) Φ D (t) = 6Dt Φ nm = n m b 2 the center-of-mass diffusion Gaussian chain structure Φ 1 nm = 4Nb2 π 2 p=1 1 p 2 cos(pπm N ) cos(pπn N )[1 exp( tp2 /τ R )] dynamic part, Φ 1 nm (t = ) =. The center-of-mass diffusion is as for any diffusing object represented by a common factor exp( Q 2 Dt): S(Q, t) = exp( Q 2 Dt)S intrachain (Q, t) For t = is S(Q, t) = S(Q), i.e. the structure factor corresponds to a snap-shot of the chain structure: S(Q) = 1 N exp( 1 n,m 6 Q2 n m b 2 )

Rouse Dynamics: Single Chain Scattering IV S(Q) = 1 N n,m exp( 1 6 Q2 n m b 2 ) summations integration R 2 g = 1 6 Nb2 Debye-function: S(Q) = Nf Debye (Q 2 R 2 g) f Debye (x) = 2 x 2(e x 1 + x) 1 1 dσ/dω / cm 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 3 incoherent incoherent / 3 d incoherent 1 1 1 1 1 Q / nm 1

Rouse Dynamics: Single Chain Scattering V S(Q, t) = 1 N n,m exp( 1 6 Q2 Φ nm (t)) F(Q, t) = S(Q, t)/s(q) 1..8 S(Q,t).6.4 t=.2 t= 2 4 6 8 Q R g h(u) = 2 π high-q behavior of S intrachain (Q, t) [degennes] S intern (Q, t) = 12 du exp[ u Γ Q 2 b 2 q t h(u/ Γ q t)] characteristic relaxation rate: Γ q = k BT 12ξ Q4 b 2 with dx cos(xu)(1 e x2 )/x 2 = 2 π e u2 /4 + u [erf(u/2) 1]

Rouse Dynamics: Single Chain Scattering VI Rouse scaling: 1. PEE Homopolymer, T=473K.8 S(Q,t)/S(Q).6.4.2 Rouse + Diffusion Rouse (N = ) 1 1 2 Q 2 (Wl 4 t) 2 1 1 1. Kumulante (PEE) Γ(q) / (s 1 ) 1 9 1 8 1 7 T=533K T=473K 1 6 1 5 Wl 4 q 4 q / A 1.1

Zimm Dynamics: Single Chain Scattering in Solution I ζ v D R f 3kT l 2 x H( r) = 1 8πηr 1 + r r r 2 R n t = m H nm k 2 m 2 R m + f m (t) preaveraging... H nm = 1 6πη 1 R n R m 1 (6π 3 n m ) 1/2 ηb) 1 = 1 h(n m).

Zimm Dynamics: Single Chain Scattering in Solution I Fourier transform (mode representation): X p / t = q h pq (k q Xq + f q ) FT[h(m n)] h pq δ pq 1/(2ηb 3π 3 pn) analogous to Rouse but: τ p = α 1 η( N/b) 3 k B T p 3/2 and k B T D cm = α 2 η N/b (1) with α 1.325 and α 2 =.196 for theta solutions (Gaussian chain) high Q approximation: S intern (Q, t) = 12 du exp[ u ( Γ (Qb) 2 q t) 2/3 h(u/[ Γq t] 2/3 )] with Γ q = k BT 6πη Q3 h(u) = 2 π dx cos(xu)(1 e x3/2 / 2 )/x 2

Zimm Dynamics: Single Chain Scattering in Solution I Scaling: Γ Q 3 S(Q, t) = f[(k B T/6πη) 2/3 (Q 3 t) 2/3 ], solely depends on the solvent viscosity η! S(Q,t)/S(Q) 1..8.6.4.2 1 2 3 4 5 [kt/(6πη) Q 3 t] (2/3)