Commonwealth of Pennsylvania PA Test Method No. 709 Department of Transportation October Pages LABORATORY TESTING SECTION. Method of Test for

Similar documents
CALCULATIONS FOR THE MARSHALL MIX DESIGN OF BITUMINOUS MIXTURES

AF2903 Road Construction and Maintenance. Volumetric Analysis of Asphalt Mixtures

Note 2: For mechanical hammers, the lab shall determine its own equivalency to the 75 blows of the manual hammer.

YEAR 2018 CCIL CORRELATION. MIX COMPLIANCE (Ontario)

DESIGN OF ULTRA-THIN BONDED HOT MIX WEARING COURSE (UTBHMWC) MIXTURES

EFFECTS OF TEST VARIABILITY ON MIXTURE VOLUMETRICS AND MIX DESIGN VERIFICATION

SPECIFIC GRAVITY AND ABSORPTION OF COARSE AGGREGATE FOP FOR AASHTO T 85

METHOD OF TEST FOR RELATIVE DENSITY AND ABSORPTION OF FINE AGGREGATE

SPECIFIC GRAVITY AND ABSORPTION OF COARSE AGGREGATE FOP FOR AASHTO T 85

Volumetric Tests. Overview

CE330L Student Lab Manual Mineral Aggregate Properties

Commonwealth of Pennsylvania PA Test Method No. 729 Department of Transportation October Pages LABORATORY TESTING SECTION. Method of Test for

Superpave Volumetric Calculations Review

Of course the importance of these three problematics is affected by the local environmental conditions.

Asphalt Mix Designer. Module 2 Physical Properties of Aggregate. Specification Year: July Release 4, July


Influence of Variation in the Aggregate Gradation Range on Mix Design Properties of Bituminous Concrete (BC) Mixes used as Wearing Course

SIEVE ANALYSIS OF AGGREGATE (Kansas Test Method KT-2)

WACEL AGGREGATE LABORATORY TESTING TECHNICIAN

Dry mix design. Lecture Notes in Transportation Systems Engineering. Prof. Tom V. Mathew. 1 Overview 1. 2 Selection of aggregates 1

EXPERIMENT 3 DETERMINATION OF SPECIFIC GRAVITY AND WATER ABSORPTION OF AGGREGATES

EVALUATION OF VACUUM DRYING FOR DETERMINATION OF BULK SPECIFIC GRAVITY OF HMA SAMPLES

Influence of Crushing Size of the Aggregates on Dense Bituminous Mix and Experimental Study on Mechanical Properties

The Nottingham eprints service makes this work by researchers of the University of Nottingham available open access under the following conditions.

OHD L-14 METHOD OF TEST FOR DETERMINING THE SPECIFIC GRAVITY AND UNIT WEIGHT OF COMPACTED BITUMINOUS MIXTURES

Mar 1, 2018 LAB MANUAL INDEX 1. Table of Contents Laboratory Testing Methods Reducing Aggregate Field Samples to Testing Size (Ver.

Status Update: NCHRP Project 9-48

Chapter 2. The Ideal Aggregate. Aggregates

COARSE VERSUS FINE-GRADED SUPERPAVE MIXTURES: COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF RESISTANCE TO RUTTING

rom the Job-mix Formu on the Properties of Paving Mixtures

Influence of Aggregate Flakiness on Dense Bituminous Macadam & Semi Dense Bituminous Concrete Mixes

TESTING of AGGREGATES for CONCRETE

Relationships of HMA In-Place Air Voids, Lift Thickness, and Permeability Volume Two

SECTION AGGREGATE OR GRANULAR SUBBASE

SUPERPAVE VOLUMETRIC MIXTURE DESIGN AND ANALYSIS HANDBOOK

Evaluation of Rutting Depth in Flexible Pavements by Using Finite Element Analysis and Local Empirical Model

Soil Mechanics III. SOIL COMPOSITION WEIGHT-VOLUME RELATIONSHIPS TERMINOLOGY AND DEFINITIONS

Basic Aggregates Study Guide

Haleh Azari, Ph.D. AASHTO Materials Reference Laboratory HSOM Meeting, Aug. 2008

The Use of Expanded Shale, Clay and Slate Lightweight Aggregates in Granular Geotechnical Fills

Standard Test Method for Flat Particles, Elongated Particles, or Flat and Elongated Particles in Coarse Aggregate 1

EVALUATING GEORGIA S COMPACTION REQUIREMENTS FOR STONE MATRIX ASPHALT MIXTURES

A STUDY ON THE INFLUENCE OF SHAPE OF COARSE AGGREGATES ON STRENGTH OF DENSE BITUMINOUS MACADAM

APPENDIX B ABBREVIATIONS, SYMBOLS AND CONVERSION FACTORS Abbreviations

Guide for Mechanistic-Empirical Design

ROUND ROBIN EVALUATION OF NEW TEST PROCEDURES FOR DETERMINING THE BULK SPECIFIC GRAVITY OF FINE AGGREGATE

APPENDIX H CONVERSION FACTORS

Effect of glass powder instead of mineral powder on asphalt mixture

Estimating Fatigue Resistance Damage Tolerance of Asphalt Binders Using the Linear Amplitude Sweep

United States 3 The Ultran Group, Inc. Boalsburg, Pennsylvania, Unites States

SOIL MECHANICS SAB1713 DR. HETTY

Laboratory Study for Comparing Rutting Performance of Limestone and Basalt Superpave Asphalt Mixtures

Clay Robinson, PhD, CPSS, PG copyright 2009

TARGET AND TOLERANCE STUDY FOR THE ANGLE OF GYRATION USED IN THE SUPERPAVE GYRATORY COMPACTOR (SGC) By

Yield Energy of Asphalt Binders Using the Dynamic Shear Rheometer

EFFECT OF AGGREGATE SHAPE FACTORS ON THE PERFORMANCE OF ASPHALT MIXES

Aggregates. AAPA training

State of Nevada Department of Transportation Materials Division

Scope. Overview. Apparatus. FOP for AASHTO T 329. Sample. Procedure. Moisture Content of Asphalt Mixtures by Oven Method

Precision Estimates of Selected Volumetric Properties of HMA Using Non-Absorptive Aggregate

Estimating Damage Tolerance of Asphalt Binders Using the Linear Amplitude Sweep

AGGREGATE WAQTC FOP AASHTO T 248 (14) REDUCING SAMPLES OF AGGREGATES TO TESTING SIZE FOP FOR AASHTO T 248

METHOD FOR MEASURING PAVEMENT LIFT THICKNESS

APPENDIX C. Modified ASTM C 1260 Test Method to Evaluate Aggregate Reactivity in Presence of Deicer Solutions

2015 North Dakota Asphalt Conference

FACTORS AFFECTING RESILIENT MODULUS

Asst. L.Musaab.S.A. ch.2 Soil Aggregate Basic Relationships (composition of soil terminology and definitions) 2.1Composition of soil

CEEN Laboratory 4 Aggregates for Base Layers, Portland Cement Concrete & Hot Mix Asphalt

Role of Binders in Pavement Performance

Mid-Atlantic Region Technician Certification Program AGGREGATE TECHNICIAN MANUAL

Chemistry 1. Worksheet 3. Significant Figures in Calculations. 1 MathTutorDVD.com

Research Article SGC Tests for Influence of Material Composition on Compaction Characteristic of Asphalt Mixtures

Haleh Azari, Ph.D. AASHTO Materials Reference Laboratory (AMRL) AASHTO Subcommittee on Materials Meeting August 2007

(Issued 1 June 1963) C 125 CRD-C METHOD OF TEST FOR COEFFICIENT OF LINEAR THERMAL EXPANSION OF COARSE AGGREGATE (STRAIN-GAGE METHOD)

AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF BASIC AND APPLIED SCIENCES. Evaluating the Impact of Aggregate Gradations on Permanent Deformation of SMA Mixture

Effect of Mixture Design on Densification

Specific Gravity and Absorption of Aggregate by Volumetric Immersion Method (Phunque Test)

SOILS/AGGREGATE TECHNICIAN REVIEW

Introduction to Soil Mechanics Geotechnical Engineering-II

BULK SPECIFIC GRAVITY ROUND-ROBIN USING THE CORELOK VACUUM SEALING DEVICE

VOL. 2, NO. 11, Dec 2012 ISSN ARPN Journal of Science and Technology All rights reserved.

MEASURING THE EFFECT OF DE-ICING SOLUTIONS ON THE ADHESION OF ASPHALT MIXTURES

Use of Polyphosphoric Acid in Asphalt Pavement Performance Prediction WRI/FHA Symposium Cheyenne, WY June 2005

SOUTH AFRICAN NATIONAL STANDARD

Slurry Seal and Micro Surfacing Systems

GeoShanghai 2010 International Conference Paving Materials and Pavement Analysis

Design of Overlay for Flexible Pavement

ABSTRACT. The new pavement design methodology is based on mechanistic-empirical

COMPARISON OF TESTING MEHODS FOR DETERMINATION OF ASPHALT CONTENT FOR HIGH LOSS AGGREGATES

EXPERIMENT 2 SIEVE ANALYSIS OF AGGREGATES

EVALUATION OF COMPACTION SENSITIVITY OF SASKATCHEWAN ASPHALT MIXES. Thesis Submitted to the College of. Graduate Studies and Research

CONTRIBUTION OF THE COARSE AGGREGATE FRACTION TO RHEOLOGY

Adhesion and Cohesion of Asphalt in Pavement

DETAILS OF LABORATORY TESTS CONDUCTED IN THE MONTH OF APRIL 2013

Everything you ever wanted to know about HMA in 30 minutes. John D AngeloD The mouth

Soil Mechanics/Geotechnical Engineering I Prof. Dilip Kumar Baidya Department of Civil Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur

Laboratory Performance of Liquid Anti-Stripping Agents in Asphalt. Mixtures used in South Carolina

CE 240 Soil Mechanics & Foundations Lecture 3.2. Engineering Classification of Soil (AASHTO and USCS) (Das, Ch. 4)

The Superpave System Filling the gaps.

Professional Agreement Invoice and Progress Report

Transcription:

Commonwealth of Pennsylvania PA Test Method No. 709 Department of Transportation 15 Pages LABORATORY TESTING SECTION Method of Test for EFFECTIVE ASPHALT CONTENT OF BITUMINOUS PAVING MIXTURES 1. SCOPE 1.1 This method computes the effective asphalt content in a bituminous paving mixture. The effective asphalt content (P be ) of a paving mixture is the total asphalt content (P b ) minus the quantity of asphalt lost by absorption into the aggregate particles. It is the portion of the total asphalt content that remains as a coating on the outside of the aggregate particles in which the service performance of a paving mixture depends. 1.2 The effective asphalt content (not the total asphalt content) is to be used to compute the VMA (voids in mineral aggregate) and the VFA (voids filled with asphalt) in Marshall specimens (PTM 705) and pavement cores. 2. MATERIALS AND TESTS 2.1 Coarse Aggregate(s) 2.1.1 A representative sample of the coarse aggregate(s) shall be obtained in accordance with AASHTO T-248. Nominal Maximum Size (inches) Minimum Mass of Sample (kg) 12.5 mm (1/2 inch) or less, (1B) aggregate 2.5 25.0 mm (1 inch), (2B) aggregate 4.5

Page 2 2.1.2 The bulk specific gravity (dry) of the coarse aggregate(s) shall be determined in accordance with AASHTO T-83 using the following formula (the value shall be reported to three decimal places): 2.2 Fine Aggregate(s) Bulk Sp. Gr. 2.2.1 A representative sample of the fine aggregate(s) weighing at least 1.0 kg shall be obtained in accordance with AASHTO T-248. 2.2.2 The bulk specific gravity (dry) of the fine aggregate(s) shall be determined in accordance with AASHTO T-84 using the following formula (the test value shall be reported to three decimal places): A Bulk Sp. Gr. B + S - C 2.3 Mineral Filler A B-C 2.3.1 If a mineral filler is added separately to the paving mixture, a representative sample weighing at least 200 g shall be obtained in a plastic lined bag. 2.3.2 The specific gravity of the mineral filler shall be determined in accordance with AASHT0 T-133 using kerosene as a wetting agent. The test value shall be reported to three decimal places. 2.4 Asphalt Cement 2.4.1 The specific gravity of the asphalt cement (G b ) shall be determined at 25 o C (77 o F) in accordance with AASHT0 T-228 and shall be reported to three decimal places. The value furnished by the asphalt supplier may be used.

Page 3 2.5 Bituminous Paving Mixture 2.5.1 The maximum specific gravity (G mm ) of the loose bituminous paving mixture containing a known asphalt content (P b ), by total mass of the mixture, shall be determined by AASHTO T-209. 2.5.2 The effective specific gravity (G se ) of the combined aggregates in the same mixture shall be calculated as follows (Note 1): Where: G se Gmm (100 - Pb) Gmm FUNCx 100 - Pb Gb G se effective specific gravity of the aggregates G mm maximum specific gravity of the loose paving mixture P b asphalt content, percent by total weight of the mixture G b specific gravity of the asphalt NOTE 1- A worksheet to calculate the effective specific gravity(g se ) by the above formula is appended to this PTM.

Page 4 3. CALCULATIONS 3.1 Bulk specific gravity of the total aggregate (G sb )- When the total aggregate consists of separate fractions of coarse aggregate(s), fine aggregate(s), and mineral filler (if added separately), all having different specific gravities, the combined bulk specific gravity for the total aggregate is calculated as follows (assuming there are three aggregates): G sb P1 + P2 + P3 P1 + P2 + P3 G1 G2 G3 Where: G sb bulk specific gravity of the total aggregate P 1, P 2, P 3 percentages by weight of aggregates l, 2 and 3 in the paving mixture G 1, G 2, G 3 bulk specific gravities of aggregates l, 2, and 3 (Sections 2.1, 2.2, and 2.3 of this PTM) NOTE 2- A worksheet to calculate G sb by the above formula is appended to this PTM. 3.2 Percent asphalt absorbed by the aggregate (P ba )- Absorption is expressed as a percentage by weight of aggregate rather than as a percentage by total weight of the mixture. It shall be calculated as follows: Where: P ba G G se se - G x G sb sb x G b x 100 P ba absorbed asphalt, percent by weight of aggregate G se effective specific gravity of the aggregate G sb bulk specific gravity of the aggregate G b specific gravity of the asphalt NOTE 3 - A worksheet to calculate P ba by the above formula is appended to this PTM.

Page 5 3.3 Effective asphalt content of the paving mixture- The effective asphalt content (P be ) of a paving mixture is the total asphalt content minus the quantity of asphalt lost by absorption into the aggregate particles. Effective asphalt content (P be ) shall be calculated as follows: Pba Pbe Pb - (100 - Pb) 100 Where: P be effective asphalt content, percent by total weight of the mixture P b asphalt content, percent by total weight of the mixture P ba absorbed asphalt, percent by weight of the aggregate NOTE 4 - A worksheet to calculate P be by the above formula is appended to this PTM. 4. REPORT 4.1 Effective asphalt content (P be ) shall be reported to the nearest 0.1 percent. 4.2 Effective asphalt content (P be )is intended to be used to compute the VMA (voids in mineral aggregate) and the VFA (voids filled with asphalt) using the Marshall specimen worksheet (PTM 705). 5. REFERENCES The Asphalt Institute MS-2 AASHTO T-84, T-85, T-209, T-248, and PTM 705

Page 6 APPENDIX TO PTM 709 EXAMPLE 1 (Using Formula) Given: Constituent Bulk Sp. Gr Percent by Weight Material Value Test Method Total Mix Coarse aggregate 2.604 (G 1 ) AASHTO T-85 51.4 (P 1 ) Fine aggregate #1 2.827 (G 2 ) AASHTO T-84 18.7 (P 2 ) Fine aggregate #2 2.619 (G 3 ) AASHTO T-84 22.9 (P 3 ) Asphalt cement 1.010 (G b ) AASHTO T-228 7.0 (P b ) TOTAL: 100.0 Maximum Sp. Gr. of Mix (AASHTO T-209) 2.439 (G mm ) Calculate the Effective Asphalt Content in the above mixture as follows: (a) Bulk Sp. Gr. of the Total Aggregate (G sb ) G sb P1 + P2 + P3 P1 + P2 + P3 G1 G2 G3 51.4 +18.7 + 22.9 51.4 18.7 22.9 + + 2.604 2.827 2.619 93.0 19.739 + 6.615 + 8.744 93.0 35.098 2.650

Page 7 (b) Effective Sp. Gr. of the Total Aggregate (G se ): Gmm (100 - Pb) Gse Gmm x 100 - Pb Gb 2.439 (100-7.0) 2.439 x 7.0 100-1.010 226.827 100-16.904 226.827 83.096 2.730 (c) Percent Asphalt Absorbed by the Aggregate (P ba ): Gse - Gsb Pba x Gb x 100 Gse x Gsb 2.730-2.650 x 1.010 x 100 2.730 x 2.650 0.080 x 101.0 1.117 7.234

Page 8 (d) Effective Asphalt Content (P be ) in the Mixture: Pba Pbe Pb - (100 - Pb) 100 1.117 7.0 - (100-7.0) 100 7.0-1.039 5.961 6.0 (rounded to one- tenth percent)

Page 9

Page 10

Page 11

Page 12

WORK SHEET FOR DETERMINATION OF EFFECTIVE ASPHALT CONTENT A. BULK SP. GR. OF THE TOTAL AGGREGATE (G sb ) PTM No.709 Page 13 Aggregate Type (Coarse or Fine) Percentage in Mix (P) Bulk Sp. Gr. (G) P G Aggregate #1 Aggregate #2 Aggregate #3 Aggregate #4 Mineral Filler TOTALS Gsb Summation of P Summation of P/G B. EFFECTIVE SP. GR. OF THE TOTAL AGGREGATE (G se ) 1 2 3 1 Max. Sp. Gr. of the Mix (G mm ) 2 % Total AC in the Mix (P b ) 3 Sp. Gr. of the AC (G b ) 4 Line 2 Line 3 (cc of AC) 5 100 - Line 2 6 Line 1 x Line 5 7 Line 1 x Line 4 8 100 - Line 7 9 Line 6 Line 8 (Effective Sp. Gr. of the total aggregate, (G se ) Average Value of G se

Page 14 C. PERCENT ASPHALT ABSORBED BY AGGREGATE (P ba ) Line 1 Effective Sp. Gr. of the total aggregate (G se ) 2 Bulk. Sp. Gr. of the total aggregate (G sb ) 3 Sp. Gr. of the Asphalt Cement (G b ) 4 Line 1 - Line 2 5 Line 1 x Line 2 6 Line 4 Line 5 7 Line 6 x Line 3 8 Line 7 x 100 (Percent AC Absorbed by the aggregate, P ba ) D. EFFECTIVE ASPHALT CONTENT IN MIX (P be ) Line 1 % Total AC in the Mix (P b ) 2 % AC Absorbed by the aggregate (P ba ) 3 Line 2-100 4 100 - Line 1 5 Line 3 x Line 4 6 Line 1 - Line 5 (Effective Asphalt Content in the Mix, P be )

This page left intentionally blank PTM No.709 Page 15