STABILITY ANALYSIS MODULE

Similar documents
April 15, 2011 Sample Quiz and Exam Questions D. A. Caughey Page 1 of 9

APPENDIX C DRAG POLAR, STABILITY DERIVATIVES AND CHARACTERISTIC ROOTS OF A JET AIRPLANE (Lectures 37 to 40)

AE Stability and Control of Aerospace Vehicles

Fundamentals of Airplane Flight Mechanics

Flight Dynamics and Control. Lecture 3: Longitudinal stability Derivatives G. Dimitriadis University of Liege

Mechanics of Flight. Warren F. Phillips. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Professor Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Utah State University WILEY

Alternative Expressions for the Velocity Vector Velocity restricted to the vertical plane. Longitudinal Equations of Motion

Aerodynamics SYST 460/560. George Mason University Fall 2008 CENTER FOR AIR TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS RESEARCH. Copyright Lance Sherry (2008)

Flight Vehicle Terminology

Introduction to Flight Dynamics

( ) (where v = pr ) v V

Design, Analysis and Research Corporation (DARcorporation) ERRATA: Airplane Flight Dynamics and Automatic Flight Controls Part I

Stability and Control Some Characteristics of Lifting Surfaces, and Pitch-Moments

Applications Linear Control Design Techniques in Aircraft Control I

Trim 2D. Holly Lewis University of Colorado Center for Aerospace Structures April 29, 2004

Experimental Aerodynamics. Experimental Aerodynamics

Rotor reference axis

/ m U) β - r dr/dt=(n β / C) β+ (N r /C) r [8+8] (c) Effective angle of attack. [4+6+6]

AOE 3104 Problem Sheet 10 (ans)

Aircraft Performance, Stability and control with experiments in Flight. Questions

Flight Dynamics and Control

Lecture AC-1. Aircraft Dynamics. Copy right 2003 by Jon at h an H ow

Computer mechanization of six-degree of freedom flight equations

University of California at Berkeley Department of Mechanical Engineering ME 163 ENGINEERING AERODYNAMICS FINAL EXAM, 13TH DECEMBER 2005

Chapter 4 The Equations of Motion

Aircraft Flight Dynamics & Vortex Lattice Codes

PRINCIPLES OF FLIGHT

Design, Analysis and Research Corporation (DARcorporation) ERRATA: Airplane Flight Dynamics and Automatic Flight Controls Part I

AA 242B/ ME 242B: Mechanical Vibrations (Spring 2016)

Supplementary Section D: Additional Material Relating to Helicopter Flight Mechanics Models for the Case Study of Chapter 10.

MDTS 5705 : Aerodynamics & Propulsion Lecture 2 : Missile lift and drag. G. Leng, MDTS, NUS

AEROSPACE ENGINEERING

Extended longitudinal stability theory at low Re - Application to sailplane models

AE 451 Aeronautical Engineering Design I Aerodynamics. Prof. Dr. Serkan Özgen Dept. Aerospace Engineering December 2017

EFFECT OF SIDESLIP ANGLE ON THE BALANCE OF AIRCRAFT MOMENTS THROUGH STEADY - STATE SPIN

Lecture #AC 3. Aircraft Lateral Dynamics. Spiral, Roll, and Dutch Roll Modes

Analysis of Wind Tunnel Oscillatory Data of the X-31A Aircraft

Introduction to Aerospace Engineering

Definitions. Temperature: Property of the atmosphere (τ). Function of altitude. Pressure: Property of the atmosphere (p). Function of altitude.

Given the water behaves as shown above, which direction will the cylinder rotate?

Introduction to Flight

A SIMPLIFIED ANALYSIS OF NONLINEAR LONGITUDINAL DYNAMICS AND CONCEPTUAL CONTROL SYSTEM DESIGN

Introduction to Atmospheric Flight. Dr. Guven Aerospace Engineer (P.hD)

Stability and Control

Chapter 1 Lecture 2. Introduction 2. Topics. Chapter-1

Flight Test Data Analysis

Flight and Orbital Mechanics

( ) = ( ) ( ) = ( ) = + = = = ( ) Therefore: , where t. Note: If we start with the condition BM = tab, we will have BM = ( x + 2, y + 3, z 5)

ν δ - 1 -

Flight Control Simulators for Unmanned Fixed-Wing and VTOL Aircraft

Spacecraft and Aircraft Dynamics

EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATION OF THE DYNAMIC STABILITY DERIVATIVES FOR A FIGHTER MODEL

AE 451 Aeronautical Engineering Design I Aerodynamics. Prof. Dr. Serkan Özgen Dept. Aerospace Engineering December 2015

Air Loads. Airfoil Geometry. Upper surface. Lower surface

8 The HIRM+ Flight Dynamics Model

Introduction to Aerospace Engineering

Aero-Propulsive-Elastic Modeling Using OpenVSP

Drag (2) Induced Drag Friction Drag Form Drag Wave Drag

Chapter 5 Performance analysis I Steady level flight (Lectures 17 to 20) Keywords: Steady level flight equations of motion, minimum power required,

Drag Analysis of a Supermarine. Spitfire Mk V at Cruise Conditions

A Blade Element Approach to Modeling Aerodynamic Flight of an Insect-scale Robot

F-35: A case study. Eugene Heim Leifur Thor Leifsson Evan Neblett. AOE 4124 Configuration Aerodynamics Virginia Tech April 2003

A model of an aircraft towing a cable-body system

Modelling the dynamics of an unmanned aircraft using a graphical simulation tool

16.333: Lecture # 7. Approximate Longitudinal Dynamics Models

Giovanni Tarantino, Dipartimento di Fisica e Tecnologie Relative, Università di Palermo (Italia)

AM25 UNMANNED AIR VEHICLE FLIGHT CONTROL

Numerical Study on Performance of Innovative Wind Turbine Blade for Load Reduction

FLIGHT DYNAMICS. Robert F. Stengel. Princeton University Press Princeton and Oxford

Theoretical and experimental research of supersonic missile ballistics

Study of Preliminary Configuration Design of F-35 using simple CFD

PART ONE Parameters for Performance Calculations

Longitudinal Static Stability

Prediction of Aircraft s Longitudinal Motion Based on Aerodynamic Coefficients and Derivatives by Surrogate Model Approach

Induced Drag and High-Speed Aerodynamics Robert Stengel, Aircraft Flight Dynamics, MAE 331, 2018

Chapter 1 Introduction (Lectures 1,2 and 3)

Dynamics and Control Preliminary Examination Topics

Experimental Aircraft Parameter Estimation

Consider a wing of finite span with an elliptic circulation distribution:

FREQUENCY DOMAIN FLUTTER ANALYSIS OF AIRCRAFT WING IN SUBSONIC FLOW

Flight and Orbital Mechanics

Evaluation of the Drag Reduction Potential and Static Stability Changes of C-130 Aft Body Strakes

GyroRotor program : user manual

MAV Unsteady Characteristics in-flight Measurement with the Help of SmartAP Autopilot

Written in August 2017 during my holiday in Bulgaria, Sunny Coast

Equations of Motion for Micro Air Vehicles

Aircraft stability and control Prof: A. K. Ghosh Dept of Aerospace Engineering Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur

Thin airfoil theory. Chapter Compressible potential flow The full potential equation

I would re-name this chapter Unpowered flight The drag polar, the relationship between lift and drag.

AN INTRODUCTION TO AIRCRAFT WING FLUTTER Revision A

SPC Aerodynamics Course Assignment Due Date Monday 28 May 2018 at 11:30

EVOLVING DOCUMENT ME 5070 Flight Dynamics

Stability and Control Analysis in Twin-Boom Vertical Stabilizer Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV)

DEPARTMENT OF AEROSPACE ENGINEERING, IIT MADRAS M.Tech. Curriculum

Full-Scale Wind Tunnel Study of the Seaglider Underwater Glider

Introduction to Aerospace Engineering

Stability Characteristics of Micro Air Vehicles from Experimental Measurements

Aeroelasticity & Experimental Aerodynamics. Lecture 7 Galloping. T. Andrianne

Lecture 11 Overview of Flight Dynamics I. Dr. Radhakant Padhi Asst. Professor Dept. of Aerospace Engineering Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore

AN ENGINEERING LEVEL PREDICTION METHOD FOR NORMAL-FORCE INCREASE DUE TO WEDGE SECTIONS

Transcription:

SURFAES STABIITY ANAYSIS MOUE User Manual

SURFAES - Stability Analysis Module Orientation of Forces and Moments...3 Force and Moment Nomenclature...4 Aerodynamic versus Stability oordinate System...5 Increase in Angle of Attack... 5 Increase in Angle of Yaw... 6 Standard tion of Stability Parameters...7 Stability erivatives omputed by SURFAES...15 ocument Title Page Numbers stab.doc Surfaces - Validation Page of 17

Orientation of Forces and Moments Positive F Positive M Y +α Positive M -α Y Aerodynamic S (AS: Note that +α causes F >0, M >0, and M Y<0 STABE M +M STABE M Y +M Y NEUTRA M +M Stability S (SS: Note that +α (is also +α in the AS causes F <0, M <0, and M Y<0 -α +α -α +α -α +α -M -M Y -M Positive M Negative M Positive F Y Y -β +β Aerodynamic S (AS: Note that +β causes F Y>0, M <0, and M >0 STABE M NEUTRA M Y STABE M Stability S (SS: Note that +β (is actually β in the AS causes F Y<0, M >0, and M <0 +M +M Y +M +β +β -β -β -β +β -M -M Y -M ocument Title Page Numbers stab.doc Surfaces - Validation Page 3 of 17

Force and Moment Nomenclature Name SURFAES Other names Axial force (along -axis F Side force (along Y-axis FY Y Normal force (along -axis F Rolling moment (about -axis M Pitching moment (about Y-axis MY M Yawing moment (about -axis M N oefficient of axial force (along -axis x x oefficient of side force (along Y-axis y y oefficient of normal force (along -axis z z oefficient of rolling moment (about -axis l l oefficient of pitching moment (about Y-axis m m oefficient of yawing moment (about -axis n n z x y x y Standard right-handed Aerodynamic oordinate System (AS. z Typical right-handed Stability oordinate System (SS. Note 1: Positive rotation about an axis is always in the direction of the thumb of the right hand, as can be seen in the above figure. Note : SURFAES uses a standard right handed Aerodynamic oordinate System (AS, which is conventionally used for other aspects of aircraft aerodynamic analyses. In this coordinate system, the sign of the lift is positive, when pointing upwards (i.e. towards positive, and the sign of the drag is positive, when pointing backwards (i.e. towards positive. The user must be cognizant of the orientation of the axes when interpreting results. Note 3: SURFAES comes with a routine that will convert stability derivatives to a standard body axes Stability oordinate System (SS. This is typically the default for stability and control related tools. ocument Title Page Numbers stab.doc Surfaces - Validation Page 4 of 17

Aerodynamic versus Stability oordinate System Increase in Angle of Attack Standard right-handed Aerodynamic oordinate System (AS. Typical right-handed Stability oordinate System (SS. x z y +α +α y z x Increase in a (in Aerodynamic S Values in VM x (drag becomes more positive xa > 0 y 0 (no side force for a symmetric aircraft ya 0 z (lift becomes more positive za > 0 l 0 (no roll for a symmetric aircraft la 0 m (nose pitch down more negative ma < 0 n 0 (no yaw for a symmetric aircraft na 0 a > 0 a > 0 Increase in a (in Stability S Values in STAB x (drag becomes more negative xa < 0 y 0 (no side force for a symmetric aircraft ya 0 z (lift becomes more negative za < 0 l 0 (no roll for a symmetric aircraft la 0 m (nose pitch down more negative ma < 0 n 0 (no yaw for a symmetric aircraft na 0 a > 0 a > 0 ocument Title Page Numbers stab.doc Surfaces - Validation Page 5 of 17

Increase in Angle of Yaw Standard right-handed Aerodynamic oordinate System (AS. Typical right-handed Stability oordinate System (SS. x z x y +β y z β Increase in b (in Aerodynamic S Values in VM Increase in b (in Stability S Values in STAB x or (expect a small change y > 0 (if β is positive z or (expect a small change l < 0 (for a restoring dihedral effect m (expect a small change n > 0 (yaw for a symmetric aircraft or or xb small yb > 0 zb small lb < 0 mb small nb > 0 b small b small x or (expect a small change y < 0 (if β is positive z or (expect a small change l < 0 (for a restoring dihedral effect m or (expect a small change n > 0 (yaw for a symmetric aircraft or or xb small yb < 0 zb small lb < 0 mb small nb > 0 b small b small ocument Title Page Numbers stab.doc Surfaces - Validation Page 6 of 17

Standard tion of Stability Parameters The following expressions can be used when other method fail to yield results. Note that selected formulation is obtained from hapter 4 in Reference 1. The user must understand limitations of each for proper use. escription Total force in the -direction of a plane-fixed global coordinate system. General Forces and Moments SURFAES 1 F F df Surface Total force in the Y-direction of a plane-fixed global coordinate system. FY F Y df Y Surface Total force in the -direction of a plane-fixed global coordinate system. F F df Surface Total moment about the -axis of a plane-fixed global coordinate system. M r l M ( df Surface r Total moment about the Y-axis of a plane-fixed global coordinate system. MY r m M Y ( df Surface r Y Total moment about the -axis of a plane-fixed global coordinate system. M r n M ( df Surface r escription Steady State oefficients SURFAES rag coefficient + i 0 ρ V S 1 The symbols are recommended as some of them are recognized internally by SURFAES. ocument Title Page Numbers stab.doc Surfaces - Validation Page 7 of 17

Induced drag i i π AR e ift coefficient + α 0 α ρ V S M Rolling moment coefficient l l M ρ V S b M Pitching moment coefficient m 3 m M Y ρ V S Y M ρ Yawing moment coefficient n 4 n M V S b Force in the -direction. x 5 General form: Small angle relation: sin α cosα T T α Force in the Y-direction. (Main contributions made are by and the fuselage y 6 Tail contribution: Y ( ( α S β σ S Force in the -direction. z 7 General form: ( cosα sin α Small angle relation: ( α Thrust coefficient. t T T ρ V S Note that l derivatives are referred to as la, lb, lta, lu, lp, lq, lr. 3 Note that m derivatives are referred to as ma, mb, mta, mu, mp, mq, mr. 4 Note that n derivatives are referred to as na, nb, nta, nu, np, nq, nr. 5 Note that x derivatives are referred to as xa, xb, xta, xu, xp, xq, xr. 6 Note that y derivatives are referred to as ya, yb, yta, yu, yp, yq, yr. 7 Note that z derivatives are referred to as za, zb, zta, zu, zp, zq, zr. ocument Title Page Numbers stab.doc Surfaces - Validation Page 8 of 17

irectional stability contribution of vertical tail nvt ( n V ( V V V escription SURFAES AOA erivatives ift curve slope a α + AR β κ π AR tan Λ 1+ β / + 4 rag curve slope a α π AR e α General form: α T + + α Since T is typically not dependent on α, this becomes: F variation with AOA. xa α π AR e α as shown in Reference 1. Note that the subscript 0 in the reference document is omitted here, but this refers to a reference condition. SURFAES always uses and where Reference 1 uses o and o. Should be zero for a symmetric airplane. FY variation with AOA. ya Yα Y F variation with AOA. za + + α ( + α α α Should be zero for a symmetric airplane: Rolling moment variation with AOA. la M α M l ocument Title Page Numbers stab.doc Surfaces - Validation Page 9 of 17

M Static stability derivative Y ma ( Mα α neu cg Should be zero for a symmetric airplane. Yawing moment variation with AOA. na M α M n escription SURFAES AOY erivatives ift curve variation with AOY b rag curve variation with AOY b rag force derivative xb Should be a symmetric curve, with a zero when AOY0. Side force derivative yb Tail contribution: ( ( Yβ α σ S 1 β S ift force derivative zb Should be a symmetric curve, with a zero when AOY0. ihedral effect (rolling moment lb Use USAF ATOM ontribution of vertical tail to dihedral effect σ S z 1 β S b V V lb ( l ( β β Pitching moment variation with AOY. mb Should be a symmetric curve, with a zero when AOY0. irectional stability nb nβ n β ontribution of vertical tail to directional stability V V V nbvt ( n V ( β β ocument Title Page Numbers stab.doc Surfaces - Validation Page 10 of 17

escription Rolling moment derivative Pitching moment derivative Yawing moment derivative rag force derivative Side force derivative ift force derivative d(aoa/dt erivatives SURFAES TA YTA TA TA YTA TA escription SURFAES U erivatives General form: u V V u u T ρ V S u T T u M M Speed damping xu Gliders: Jets/rockets: u u onstant speed propellers: u M M 3 3 T T M M ( + tan θ M M ( + tan θ M M M M ift damping yu Usually zero. Variation of vertical force by change in airspeed. By definition this is: u V u V u M M ift damping zu Get by a first or a second order curvefit of versus U in radians. This tends to be small, except at transonic speeds. Per Reference 1, theoretical values are easily calculated for high AR straight wings from: M 1 M u α The derivative impacts phugoid mode by changing the damping. ocument Title Page Numbers stab.doc Surfaces - Validation Page 11 of 17

Rolling moment derivative lu Usually zero. hange in pitching moment with airspeed. May be due to compressibility or aeroelastic reasons, but primarily due to shift in center of pressure at transonic speeds. Theoretically, this is given by: Pitching moment derivative mu m u M M MY + ρ V MY 1 ( ρ V Yawing moment derivative nu Usually zero. The derivative impacts phugoid mode by changing the frequency of oscillation (i.e. period. P (Roll Rate erivatives escription SURFAES rag force derivative xp Negligible. amping in roll derivative (mostly a wing contribution yp FY variation with P. (Often negligible, but mostly impacted by wing and. ypvt contribution: ( ( yp α S S z b σ P b V ift force derivative zp amping in roll derivative lp No simple formula. Pitching moment derivative mp Negligible. ross derivative due to roll np Negligible. contribution: ontribution of the to the ross derivative due to roll npvt ( ( np HT α z VV b HT σ P b V Q (Pitch Rate erivatives escription SURFAES rag force derivative xq Negligible, unless wing is swept or of low aspect ratio. Side force derivative yq Negligible, unless wing is swept or of low aspect ratio. F variation with Q. zq Negligible, unless wing is swept or of low aspect ratio. ontribution of the horizontal tail to the F variation with Q. zqht ( zq ( H HT α HT V Rolling moment derivative lq Negligible, unless wing is swept or of low aspect ratio. MY variation with Q, etc. mq Negligible, unless wing is swept or of low aspect ratio. ontribution of the horizontal tail to the MY variation with Q. mqht ocument Title Page Numbers stab.doc Surfaces - Validation Page 1 of 17

HT ( ( V mq HT α HT H Yawing moment derivative nq Negligible, unless wing is swept or of low aspect ratio. R (Yaw Rate erivatives escription SURFAES rag force derivative xr Negligible. amping in roll derivative (mostly a contribution yr Most important contribution is normally from the. Vertical tail contribution. yrvt contribution: ( ( yr α S S b σ + P b V ift force derivative zr Negligible. ross derivative due to yaw lr No simple formula. aused by increase in lift on one wing and decrease in the other. Additionally, large may contribute. argest at low speeds. ontribution of the vertical tail to the ross derivative due to yaw lrvt contribution: ( ( lr α S S z b + b σ + P b V Pitching moment derivative amping-in-yaw derivative mr nr No simple formula. Always negative. Fuselage effects are usually negligible. Mostly affected by wing and. ontribution of the vertical tail to the amping-in-yaw derivative nrvt contribution: ( ( nr α VV b σ + P b V escription Horizontal Tail Volume Miscellaneous oefficients SURFAES Vht V H HT S S HT ocument Title Page Numbers stab.doc Surfaces - Validation Page 13 of 17

Horizontal Tail Volume Vvt V V S b S ocument Title Page Numbers stab.doc Surfaces - Validation Page 14 of 17

Stability erivatives omputed by SURFAES escription STEAY STATE OEFFIIENTS Basic lift coefficient ift curve slope ift coefficient Basic drag coefficient (user input Skin friction drag coefficient (user input Induced drag coefficient rag coefficient rag coefficient slope o a o f i a F variation with AOA FY variation with AOA F variation with AOA Rolling Moment wrt AOA Pitching Moment wrt AOA Yawing Moment wrt AOA Variation of thrust with AOA ocation of neutral point as % of MA ongitudinal Static Margin F variation with AOY Side force derivative F variation with AOY ihedral Effect Pitching Moment wrt AOY irectional Stability AOA ERIVATIVES AOY ERIVATIVES xa ya za la ma na Ta hn SM xb yb zb lb mb nb U ERIVATIVES rag variation with airspeed (Mach Number Thrust variation with airspeed Speed amping Side force damping ift force damping Rolling moment with U Pitching moment with U Yawing moment with U M Tu xu yu zu lu mu nu ift variation with P rag variation with P F variation with P Side force due to roll derivative F variation with P amping-in-roll derivative P ERIVATIVES(RO p p xp yp zp lp ocument Title Page Numbers stab.doc Surfaces - Validation Page 15 of 17

Pitching moment variation with P ross derivative due to roll ift variation with Q rag variation with Q F variation with Q FY variation with Q F variation with Q Rolling moment with Q Pitching moment with Q Yawing moment with Q ift variation with R rag variation with R F variation with R FY variation with R F variation with R ross derivative due to yaw Pitching moment with R amping-in-yaw derivative Q ERIVATIVES(PITH R ERIVATIVES(YAW mp np q q xq yq zq lq mq nq r r xr yr zr lr mr nr ift variation with roll rag variation with roll F variation in roll FY variation in roll F variation in roll M variation in roll MY variation in roll M variation in roll ift variation with pitch rag variation with pitch F variation in pitch FY variation in pitch F variation in pitch M variation in pitch MY variation in pitch M variation in pitch ift variation with yaw rag variation with yaw F variation in yaw FY variation in yaw F variation in yaw M variation in yaw AIERON EFETION ERIVATIVES(RO EEVATOR EFETION ERIVATIVES(PITH RUER EFETION ERIVATIVES(YAW da da xda yda zda lda mda nda de de xde yde zde lde mde nde dr dr xdr ydr zdr ldr ocument Title Page Numbers stab.doc Surfaces - Validation Page 16 of 17

MY variation in yaw M variation in yaw ift variation with flap rag variation with flap F variation in flap FY variation in flap F variation in flap M variation in flap MY variation in flap M variation in flap HIGH IFT EFETION ERIVATIVES mdr ndr df df xdf ydf zdf ldf mdf ndf ocument Title Page Numbers stab.doc Surfaces - Validation Page 17 of 17