Analisi sismica non lineare di edifici in muratura con il programma TREMURI

Similar documents
Nonlinear seismic analysis of masonry buildings

STATIC NONLINEAR ANALYSIS. Advanced Earthquake Engineering CIVIL-706. Instructor: Lorenzo DIANA, PhD

Response of Historic Masonry Structures to Tectonic Ground Displacements

Seismic resistance of a reinforced concrete building before and after retrofitting Part II: The retrofitted building

Effects of Damping Ratio of Restoring force Device on Response of a Structure Resting on Sliding Supports with Restoring Force Device

A Modified Response Spectrum Analysis Procedure (MRSA) to Determine the Nonlinear Seismic Demands of Tall Buildings

APPLICATION OF A POINT ESTIMATE METHOD FOR INCORPORATING EPISTEMIC UNCERTAINTY IN THE SEISMIC ASSESSMENT OF A MASONRY BUILDING

Sabah Shawkat Cabinet of Structural Engineering Walls carrying vertical loads should be designed as columns. Basically walls are designed in

THE EFFECTIVENESS OF LIGHT INTERVENTIONS OF ANTI-SEISMIC REINFORCEMENTS ON A MASONRY BUILDING

Dynamics of structures

SIMPLIFIED PROCEDURE FOR THE SEISMIC RISK ASSESSMENT OF UNREINFORCED MASONRY BUILDINGS

Dynamic non-linear analysis Hysteretic models EDCE: Civil and Environmental Engineering CIVIL Advanced Earthquake Engineering

ENERGY DIAGRAM w/ HYSTERETIC

SEISMIC RESPONSE EVALUATION OF AN RC BEARING WALL BY DISPLACEMENT-BASED APPROACH

Structural Analysis Lab

Boundary Nonlinear Dynamic Analysis

Analysis Of Seismic Performance Of Fps Base Isolated Structures Subjected To Near Fault Events

Preliminary Examination - Dynamics

Limit analysis of brick masonry shear walls with openings under later loads by rigid block modeling

Design of Earthquake-Resistant Structures

Inelastic shear response of RC coupled structural walls

Structural Damage Detection Using Time Windowing Technique from Measured Acceleration during Earthquake

Dynamic Analysis of a Reinforced Concrete Structure Using Plasticity and Interface Damage Models

Application of Capacity Spectrum Method to timber houses considering shear deformation of horizontal frames

Nonlinear static analysis PUSHOVER

Dynamics of Structures

Lecture 4 Dynamic Analysis of Buildings

Comparison between Different Shapes of Structure by Response Spectrum Method of Dynamic Analysis

Nonlinear Analysis of Reinforced Concrete Bridges under Earthquakes

EFFECT OF SHEAR REINFORCEMENT ON FAILURE MODE OF RC BRIDGE PIERS SUBJECTED TO STRONG EARTHQUAKE MOTIONS

Multi Linear Elastic and Plastic Link in SAP2000

on the figure. Someone has suggested that, in terms of the degrees of freedom x1 and M. Note that if you think the given 1.2

Introduction to structural dynamics

6. NON-LINEAR PSEUDO-STATIC ANALYSIS OF ADOBE WALLS

IS DIRECT DISPLACEMENT BASED DESIGN VALID FOR LONG SPAN BRIDGES?

Seismic design of bridges

Gravity dam and earthquake

CAPACITY SPECTRUM FOR STRUCTURES ASYMMETRIC IN PLAN

Codal Provisions IS 1893 (Part 1) 2002

RESPONSE SPECTRUM METHOD FOR ESTIMATION OF PEAK FLOOR ACCELERATION DEMAND

Unscaled, scaled, adjusted, and artificial spectral matching accelerograms: displacement- and energy-based assessment.

DUCTILITY BEHAVIOR OF A STEEL PLATE SHEAR WALL BY EXPLICIT DYNAMIC ANALYZING

EVALUATION OF COLLAPSE LOAD FOR MASONRY WALLS

Evaluation of the ductility demand in partial strength steel structures in seismic areas using non-linear static analysis

ANALYSIS OF HIGHRISE BUILDING STRUCTURE WITH SETBACK SUBJECT TO EARTHQUAKE GROUND MOTIONS

Displacement-based methods EDCE: Civil and Environmental Engineering CIVIL Advanced Earthquake Engineering

INELASTIC SEISMIC DISPLACEMENT RESPONSE PREDICTION OF MDOF SYSTEMS BY EQUIVALENT LINEARIZATION

Effect of Dynamic Interaction between Train Vehicle and Structure on Seismic Response of Structure

Software Verification

Giacomo Boffi. Dipartimento di Ingegneria Civile Ambientale e Territoriale Politecnico di Milano

Seismic Performance of High-rise RC Wall-type Buildings in Korea

Preliminary Examination in Dynamics

SEISMIC RELIABILITY FUNCTIONS OF MULTISTORY BUILDINGS THEIR SENSITIVITY TO SEVERAL ANALYSIS AND DESIGN VARIABLES

SEISMIC DESIGN OF ARCH BRIDGES DURING STRONG EARTHQUAKE

D : SOLID MECHANICS. Q. 1 Q. 9 carry one mark each. Q.1 Find the force (in kn) in the member BH of the truss shown.

PEER/SSC Tall Building Design. Case study #2

Displacement capacity of ancient structures through non-linear kinematic and dynamic analyses

NUMERICAL SIMULATION OF THE INELASTIC SEISMIC RESPONSE OF RC STRUCTURES WITH ENERGY DISSIPATORS

Soil-Structure Interaction in Nonlinear Pushover Analysis of Frame RC Structures: Nonhomogeneous Soil Condition

Probabilistic assessment of the seismic damage in reinforced concrete buildings

Inclusion of a Sacrificial Fuse to Limit Peak Base-Shear Forces During Extreme Seismic Events in Structures with Viscous Damping

Non-Linear Modeling of Reinforced Concrete Structures for Seismic Applications

Centrifuge Shaking Table Tests and FEM Analyses of RC Pile Foundation and Underground Structure

University of Bristol - Explore Bristol Research. Peer reviewed version. Link to published version (if available): / _4

Dynamic Analysis and Modeling of Wood-framed Shear Walls

Seismic Analyses of Concrete Gravity Dam with 3D Full Dam Model

Hand Calculations of Rubber Bearing Seismic Izolation System for Irregular Buildings in Plane

SIMPLIFIED SEISMIC VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT PROCEDURE FOR REINFORCED CONCRETE BRIDGES

Coupling Beams of Shear Walls

DYNAMIC RESPONSE OF EARTHQUAKE EXCITED INELASTIC PRIMARY- SECONDARY SYSTEMS

A BEAM FINITE ELEMENT MODEL INCLUDING WARPING

Cyclic behaviour of a reinforced concrete braced frame with high damping rubber devices

PSEUDO-ENERGY RESPONSE SPECTRA FOR THE EVALUATION OF THE SEISMIC RESPONSE FROM PUSHOVER ANALYSIS

SEISMIC PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT AND RETROFITTING OF RC STRUCTURES

Comparative study between the push-over analysis and the method proposed by the RPA for the evaluation of seismic reduction coefficient

Static & Dynamic. Analysis of Structures. Edward L.Wilson. University of California, Berkeley. Fourth Edition. Professor Emeritus of Civil Engineering

THE MODELLING OF EARTHQUAKE INDUCED COLLAPSE OF UNREINFORCED MASONRY WALLS COMBINING FORCE AND DISPLACEMENT PRINCIPALS

BI-DIRECTIONAL SEISMIC ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF BRIDGE STEEL TRUSS PIERS ALLOWING A CONTROLLED ROCKING RESPONSE

Chapter 4 Seismic Design Requirements for Building Structures

Evaluation of dynamic behavior of culverts and embankments through centrifuge model tests and a numerical analysis

Special edition paper

Displacement ductility demand and strength reduction factors for rocking structures

Alireza Mehdipanah BEHAVIOUR OF BUILDINGS FEATURING TRANSFER BEAMS IN THE REGIONS OF LOW TO MODERATE SEISMICITY

CHAPTER 3 VIBRATION THEORY. Single Degree of Freedom Systems (SDOF) Stiffness, k Member Stiffness (Member Rigidity).

Dynamic Earth Pressure Problems and Retaining Walls. Behavior of Retaining Walls During Earthquakes. Soil Dynamics week # 12

CAPACITY DESIGN FOR TALL BUILDINGS WITH MIXED SYSTEM

Pushover Seismic Analysis of Bridge Structures

COLUMN BASE WEAK AXIS ALIGNED ASYMMETRIC FRICTION CONNECTION CYCLIC PERFORMANCE

CE6701 STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS AND EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING QUESTION BANK UNIT I THEORY OF VIBRATIONS PART A

Dr.Vinod Hosur, Professor, Civil Engg.Dept., Gogte Institute of Technology, Belgaum

Seismic design of bridges

VIBRATION AMPLIFICATION IN OSCILLATING SYSTEMS WITH DEGRADING CHARACTERISTICS *

1. Background. 2. Objectives of Project. Page 1 of 29

Modal pushover analysis for seismic vulnerability analysis

Response Analysis for Multi Support Earthquake Excitation

Contents i. Contents

Visco-Re-Centring Energy Dissipating System for Seismic Protection of Framed Buildings

ALGORITHM FOR NON-PROPORTIONAL LOADING IN SEQUENTIALLY LINEAR ANALYSIS

A. Belejo, R. Bento & C. Bhatt Instituto Superior Técnico, Lisbon, Portugal 1.INTRODUCTION

To initiate a dynamic analysis in FormWorks, the Analysis Mode in the JOB CONTROL tab of DEFINE JOB window has to be set to one of the two Dynamic

Transcription:

Analisi sismica non lineare di edifici in muratura con il programma TREMURI S. Lagomarsino, A. Penna, A. Galasco e S. Cattari Dipartimento di Ingegneria Strutturale e Geotecnica Università degli Studi di Genova

Strategie di modellazione Analisi limite Metodo POR Elementi finiti Macroelementi l F 2 (Podestà, 21) Como & Grimaldi Tomaževic, Braga & Dolce Gambarotta & Lagomarsino, Anthoine, Maier et al., Lourenço spandrel beam pier l F 1 joint Pagano et al. Braga & Liberatore D Asdia & Viskovic Magenes & Della Fontana

3D model of a masonry building Hypotheses: Earthquake Resistant Structure: walls + floors Walls are bearing elements Floors share vertical loads to the walls and are planar stiffening elements (orthotropic membrane) Walls out-of-plane behaviour and flexural floors response negligible with respect to global one Wall in-plane model: Frame-type model 2 nodes macro-elements: piers and lintels Joints: rigid bodies Tie-rods (no compression spar) and stringcourses (beam) elements included

Macro-element wall models Nodo Rigido Fascia Maschio Earthquake Damage Observation FEM Non-linear Continuum Model

The non-linear macro-element (Gambarotta & Lagomarsino, 1996) 3 ϕ j w j u j j 2 ϕ w 2 2 u 2 M 2 2 N 2 T 2 3 M j M 2 N j j T j 2 T 2 N 2 h 2 δ φ 2 n m w 1 (a) 1 ϕ 1 1 i w i b u 1 u i ϕ i s 1 T 1 M 1 N 1 (b) 1 N 1 M 1 1 T 1 i T i M i N i

The non-linear macro-element (Gambarotta & Lagomarsino, 1996) Shear-sliding (friction) Bending-rocking

b Crushing with degrade?b s w z x f w o w R w max = µ w R w R w s s R s R el * N = N N el M = M M * µ 1 µ ζ 1 M ( µζ,, wmax ) = bn 3 2 * N ( µζ,, wmax) = k ζbswmax * * w Vertical displacement rotation interaction: with and w/o crushing j

3D Building Model Plane structures Orthotropic floors 5 dof 3D nodes Mass sharing q, E 1, E 2, G

3D Building Model Plane structures Orthotropic floors 5 dof 3D nodes Mass sharing uz = w f x f y f u u y u x 3 dof nodes (2D) 5 dof nodes (3D) Z? Y X

3D Building Model l J Mx My x Plane structures Orthotropic floors 5 dof 3D nodes Mass sharing m Mx I My I I l M = M + m(1 cos α ) x x I I l M = M + m(1 sinα ) y y x l x l Y Z α X

TREMURI Program Implemented non-linear analysis procedures STATIC INCREMENTAL (FORCE / DISPLACEMENT) DYNAMIC (Newmark integration, Rayleigh viscous damping) 1 8 6 4 2-2 -4-6 -8-1 Influence of the vertical vibrations 1 8 6 4 2-2 -4-6 -8 -.3 -.25 -.2 -.15 -.1 -.5.5.1.15.2.25.3

TREMURI Program Implemented non-linear analysis procedures STATIC INCREMENTAL (FORCE / DISPLACEMENT) DYNAMIC (Newmark integration, Rayleigh viscous damping) PUSHOVER (analisi statica non lineare p.to 4.5.4) K k K x λf FF Fm FC F F T T k kfm mm kcm xm = λ fm K CF kcm KCC xc rc K k K x FF Fm FC F T T kfm kmm kcm xm = λ fm K CF kcm KCC xc rc f i f i f i ki1 km 1 x1 +... + kim kmm xm +... + kin kmn xn = fm fm fm

3D Pushover Analysis Parete 1 Parete 4 Parete 2 Parete 3

3D Pushover Analysis 35 35 3 3 25 2 15 1 5.2.4.6.8.1.12.14.16 Rigid floors Parete 1 Parete 2 Globale Taglio alla base [N] 25 2 15 1 5.2.4.6.8.1.12 Spostamento 2 piano [m] Flexible floors Parete 1 Parete 2 Globale P2 P2 P3 P4 P3 P4 P1 P1

3D Dynamic Analysis 3 2 1-1 a [m/s 2 ],9,6,3 -,3-2 -3 -,6 T [s] -,9 2 4 6 8 1 12 14 16 18 2 3 2 1-1 -2-3 -,9 -,6 -,3,3,6,9 -,9 -,6 -,3,3,6,9 -,9 -,6 -,3,3,6,9 Wall 1 Wall 2 Global

Simulazione numerica delle prove sperimentali su un prototipo in scala reale di edificio in muratura (Università di Pavia Magenes & Calvi, 1997) -25-2 -15-1 -5 5 1 15 2 25 Numerical results

Damage n8 9 3 n5 1 4 n9 4 5 6 n6 7 1 n4 8 2 n7 1 2 3 n1 n2 n3

Earthquake response prediction 3D building model Pushover Analysis: Load pattern: P = pm? Capacity Curve 1 Cyclic Pushover Analysis: Modal Analysis: T 1 =.16 s (= experimental value) ξ c, eff = ξ v + 2π Equivalent hysteretic damping

Curva di Capacità ed energia dissipata 3 2 1 Window wall Door wall Global Pushover Base shear [kn] -1-2 -3-3 -2-1 1 2 Second floor displacement [mm]

Analisi Dinamica PGA.2 g.4 g.6 g Base shear [N] 3 2 1-1 -2-3 Displacement [cm] 1.5 1.5 -.5-1 -1.5-2.5-2 -1.5-1 -.5.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 Second floor displacement [cm] Time [s] 2 4 6 8 1 12 14 16 18 2

Risultati delle analisi dinamiche 4.2 g.6 g.4 g 3.5 3 Sa [m/s2] 2.5 2 1.5 1.5.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 Sd [cm]

Analisi sismica di edifici reali Osservatorio Sismico delle Strutture Servizio Sismico Nazionale SSN Modal analysis P2 Modal testing Dynamic Identification by Modal Testing T 1 T 1 P6 P5 P4 P3 P7.139.139 P1 P2 T 2 T 2 P6 P5 P7 P4 P3.119.12 P1 P2 T 3 T 3 P6 P5 P7 P4 P3.15.95 P1 Seismic Analysis Acceleration [ms -2 ] 4,5 4 3,5 3 2,5 2 1,5 1 SDOF Structure,5,5,1,15,2,25,3,35,4,45,5 Displacement [m]

Analisi sismica di edifici reali Eixample district, Barcelona (Bonet et al., 22) - RISK-UE Project

Analisi di edifici reali Castelnuovo Belbo Hall, Piedmont Monferrato Earthquake 2

Municipio Castelnuovo Belbo Monferrato Earthquake 2 Analisi di edifici reali N9 48 n33 52 n28 56 n37 59 N41 32 35 39 42 45 N8 47 n32 51 n27 55 n36 58 N4 31 34 38 41 44 N7 46 N31 5 n26 54 N35 57 N39 33 36 37 4 43 N2 N29 49 n25 53 N34 N38

Seismic analysis of real buildings Pushover Analysis Dynamic Analysis 4 Direzione X Tbase (kn) 35 3 25 2 15 1 5 5 1 15 2 25 3 35 4 45 5 Umedio sommità (mm) T (kn) 4 3 2 1-3 -2-1 -1 1 2 3-2 -3-4 -5 s (mm) 4 Direzione Y Tbase (kn) 35 3 25 2 15 1 5 5 1 15 2 25 3 35 4 45 5 T (kn) 4 3 2 1-3 -2-1 -1 1 2 3-2 -3-4 -5 Umedio sommità (mm) s (mm)

Analisi di edifici reali Municipio Castelnuovo Damage simulation BelboMonferrato Earthquake 2 N15 219 N13 2 34 n128 n127 39 4 n126 n125 322 n129 33 336 337 339 38 37 338 41 N97 N197 5 N94222 N74 N174 29 212 217 N14 218 N96 6 N93 7 N73 28 211 214 216 N13 31 N95 N92 22 221 N72 27 21 213 215 N23 N98 N91 N71 N1 42 344 N17 n121 14 N11 43 317 1317 342 318 n1211 343 15 N16 13 N762 n7762 N62 N111 162 51 159 1156 156 N761 n7761 161 5 N61 158 1155 155 N76 n776 16 49 N6 157 1154 154 N759 n7759 N59

Simulazione del danno osservato Municipio Castelnuovo Damage simulation BelboMonferrato Earthquake 2 N15 219 N13 2 34 n128 n127 39 4 n126 n125 322 n129 33 336 337 339 38 37 338 41 N97 N197 5 N94222 N74 N174 29 212 217 N14 218 N96 6 N93 7 N73 28 211 214 216 N13 31 N95 N92 22 221 N72 27 21 213 215 N23 N98 N91 N71 N1 42 344 N17 n121 14 N11 43 317 1317 342 318 n1211 343 15 N16 13 N762 n7762 N62 N111 162 51 159 1156 156 N761 n7761 161 5 N61 158 1155 155 N76 n776 16 49 N6 157 1154 154 Observed damage N759 n7759 N59 Numerical simulation