PoS(Nufact08)043. The Totally Active Scintillator Detector. Alan Bross 1 2. Malcolm Ellis. Steve Geer. Enrique Fernandez-Martinez.

Similar documents
PoS(NEUTEL2015)037. The NOvA Experiment. G. Pawloski University of Minnesota Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, USA

Neutrino Detectors for future facilities - III

PoS(KAON13)012. R K Measurement with NA62 at CERN SPS. Giuseppe Ruggiero. CERN

PoS(NOW2016)003. T2K oscillation results. Lorenzo Magaletti. INFN Sezione di Bari

NEUTRINO FACTORY / MUON STORAGE RING

Advanced Neutrino Sources

Neutrino Cross Sections and Scattering Physics

PoS(KAON)049. Testing the µ e universality with K ± l ± ν decays

SciBar and future K2K physics. F.Sánchez Universitat Aútonoma de Barcelona Institut de Física d'altes Energies

Analysis of muon and electron neutrino charged current interactions in the T2K near detectors

Particle production vs. energy: how do simulation results match experimental measurements?

Neutrino oscillation physics potential of Hyper-Kamiokande

LBNF Neutrino Beam. James Strait Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory P.O. Box 500, Batavia, IL , USA. on behalf of the LBNF/DUNE Team

The Reconstruction Software for the Muon Ionization Cooling Experiment Trackers

New Limits on Heavy Neutrino from NA62

PoS(KAON)059. Giuseppe Ruggiero. Scuola Normale Superiore and INFN, Pisa, Italy

Status and Perspectives for KM3NeT/ORCA

Validation of Geant4 Physics Models Using Collision Data from the LHC

Charge Reconstruction with a Magnetized Muon Range Detector in TITUS

arxiv:hep-ex/ v1 15 Oct 2004

Recent Results from Alysia Marino, University of Colorado at Boulder Neutrino Flux Workshop, University of Pittsburgh, Dec 6 8,2012

arxiv: v4 [physics.ins-det] 15 Jan 2018

PoS(HEP2005)177. Status of the OPERA experiment. Francesco Di Capua. Universita Federico II and INFN.

Precision measurement of kaon radiative decays in NA48/2

Charged Current Quasielastic Analysis from MINERνA

NO A. Karol Lang. University of Texas at Austin. For the NOvA Collaboration. XII International Workshop on Neutrino Telescopes

Detecting ν τ appearance in the spectra of quasielastic CC events

The SHiP experiment. Colloquia: IFAE A. Paoloni( ) on behalf of the SHiP Collaboration. 1. Introduction

Anti-fiducial Muons in MINOS. Matthew Strait. University of Minnesota for the MINOS collaboration

Baby MIND: A magnetised spectrometer for the WAGASCI experiment

LBL projects and neutrino CP violation in Europe

PoS(FPCP2017)023. Latest results from T2K. Jennifer Teresa Haigh, for the T2K Collaboration

Muon reconstruction performance in ATLAS at Run-2

New Hadroproduction results from the HARP/PS214 experiment at CERN PS

New Results from the MINOS Experiment

PoS(KAON09)023. Beam Hole Photon Veto For J-PARC K O TO experiment. Yosuke Maeda Kyoto University

PoS(Nufact08)026. Summary of Working Group I: Theory. S. Choubey (a), P. Hernández (b), and C. W. Walter (c)

A data summary file structure and analysis tools for neutrino oscillation analysis at the NOvA experiment

Potential of Hyper-Kamiokande at some non-accelerator Physics and Nucleon Decay Searches

Gadolinium Doped Water Cherenkov Detectors

PoS(EPS-HEP2017)238. Experimental limiting factors for the next generation

arxiv: v1 [nucl-ex] 7 Sep 2009

The First Large Application of MPPC: T2K Neutrino Beam Monitor INGRID

Status and Neutrino Oscillation Physics Potential of the Hyper-Kamiokande Project in Japan

Recent T2K results on CP violation in the lepton sector

Neutrino Event Tagging Based On Nucleon Energy Spectra

The ALICE Inner Tracking System Off-line Software

Phenomenology at neutrino oscillation experiments

ICARUS T600 experiment: latest results and perspectives

PANDA Muon System Prototype

Particle Identification of the LHCb detector

Quasi-Elastic Scattering in MINERvA

STATUS OF ATLAS TILE CALORIMETER AND STUDY OF MUON INTERACTIONS. 1 Brief Description of the ATLAS Tile Calorimeter

Tracking and Fitting. Natalia Kuznetsova, UCSB. BaBar Detector Physics Series. November 19, November 19, 1999 Natalia Kuznetsova, UCSB 1

arxiv:hep-ex/ v1 19 Jun 2004

arxiv: v1 [physics.ins-det] 23 Oct 2007

MINERνA, a Neutrino Nucleus Interaction Experiment

A method for detecting ν τ appearance in the spectra of quasielastic CC events

Heavy Hadron Production and Spectroscopy at ATLAS

Status of the LHCb Experiment. Ueli Strauman, University of Zurich, Switzerland. Sept. 13, 2001

LHCb Semileptonic Asymmetry

Neutrino-Nucleus Scattering at MINERvA

arxiv: v1 [hep-ex] 25 Aug 2015

Emittance Measurement in the Muon Ionization Cooling Experiment

Recent results at the -meson region from the CMD-3 detector at the VEPP-2000 collider

Pros and Cons of the Acceleration Scheme (NF-IDS)

LC Muon System R & D

Track measurement in the high multiplicity environment at the CBM Experiment

NOE, a Neutrino Oscillation Experiment at Gran Sasso Laboratory

Neutrino physics with the SHiP experiment at CERN

Lepton Number and Lepton Flavour Violation

Application of GLoBES: GLACIER on conventional neutrino beams

PoS(DIS 2010)058. ATLAS Forward Detectors. Andrew Brandt University of Texas, Arlington

Recent Results from Fermilab Charm Experiment E791. David A. Sanders. Representing the Fermilab Experiment E791 Collaboration

Optical Gain Measurements for a Portable Plastic-Scintillator-Based Muon Tomography System

Long Baseline Neutrinos

The R&D study for the KLOD experiment. at IHEP (Protvino) U-70 proton

PoS(EPS-HEP2015)522. The status of MICE Step IV

PoS(ICHEP2016)552. The Mu3e Experiment at PSI. Alessandro Bravar University of Geneva

XMASS 1.5, the next step of the XMASS experiment

COMET muon conversion experiment in J-PARC

LHCb: Reoptimized Detector & Tracking Performance

Measurements and Simulations of Single-Event Upsets in a 28-nm FPGA. Hans Calén, Tord Johansson, Karoly Makónyi, Pawel Marciniewski

The Electromagnetic Calorimeter of the HERA-B Experiment

Track reconstruction for the Mu3e experiment Alexandr Kozlinskiy (Mainz, KPH) for the Mu3e collaboration DPG Würzburg (.03.22, T85.

Giant Liquid Argon Observatory for Proton Decay, Neutrino Astrophysics and CP-violation in the Lepton Sector (GLACIER)

Project P2 - The weak charge of the proton

Neutrino Nucleus Deep Inelastic Scattering at MINERvA

Status of the LHCb RICH and hadron particle identification

EUROPEAN STRATEGY FOR FUTURE NEUTRINO PHYSICS

Higgs Factory Magnet Protection and Machine-Detector Interface

Measurement of Properties of Electroweak Bosons with the DØ Detector

Alignment of the ATLAS Inner Detector tracking system

Track Reconstruction and Muon Identification in the Muon Detector of the CBM Experiment at FAIR

MINOS. Physics Program and Construction Status. Karol Lang The University of Texas at Austin. YITP: Neutrinos and Implications for Physics Beyond

Hands on LUNA: Detector Simulations with Geant4

Hadron Production Experiments and Neutrino Beams

CALICE Test Beam Data and Hadronic Shower Models

arxiv: v1 [physics.ins-det] 14 Jan 2016

THE CERN NA62 experiment [1] aims to measure the

Transcription:

1 2 Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory Batavia, IL 60510-0500, USA E-mail: bross@fnal.gov Malcolm Ellis Brunel University Uxbridge, Middlesex UB8 3PH, United Kingdom E-mail: malcolm.ellis@brunel.ac.uk Steve Geer Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory Batavia, IL 60510-0500, USA E-mail: sgeer@fnal.gov Enrique Fernandez-Martinez Max Planck Germany E-mail: enfmarti@mppmu.mpq.de Olga Mena INFN Sez. Di Roma,Dipartimento di Fisica, Universit a di Roma P.le A. Moro, 5, I-00185 Roma, Italy E-mail: olga.menarequejo@roma1.infn.it Silvia Pascoli IPPP, Department of Physics, Durham University Durham DH1 3LE, United Kingdom E-mail: silvia.pascoli@durham.ac.uk For baselines of O(1000 km), the rich oscillation pattern at a Low-Energy Neutrino Factory (E ν = 0.5-3 GeV ) provides unique performance with regard to sensitivity to CP violation and the determination of the neutrino mass hierarchy [1]. A unique neutrino detector is needed, however, in order to exploit this oscillation pattern. The Totally Active Scintillator Detector (TASD) is particularly well suited for this facility. In this paper we give an update on the performance of TASD and discuss the detector R&D program. 10th International Workshop on Neutrino Factories, Super beams and Beta beams Valencia, Spain 30 June 05 July, 2008 1 Speaker 2 This work was supported by the Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, which is operated by Universities Research Association, under contract No. DE-AC02-76CH03000 with the U.S. Department of Energy, Copyright owned by the author(s) under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike Licence. http://pos.sissa.it

1. Introduction At baselines on the order of 1000 km, the 4 GeV (E ν = 0.5-3 GeV) Low-Energy Neutrino Factory (LENF) provides great sensitivity to the full spectrum of neutrino oscillation parameters. This is possible if the detector can fully exploit the rich oscillation pattern (see Figure 1) possible at this baseline and neutrino energy. The LENF requires a detector technology that can detect lower energy muons. Recently ideas have emerged for a Neutrino Factory detector based on a fully active calorimeter within a potentially affordable large volume magnet [2]. Figure 1 Oscillation Pattern as a function of neutrino energy for neutrinos and anti-neutrinos for normal and inverted hierarchy 2. TASD The Totally Active Scintillator Detector consists of roughly 10,000 modules of triangular scintillator extrusions (10 7 channels) which are immersed in a 0.5 T magnetic field. The total detector mass is approximately 30 kt with a fiducial mass of 20 kt. 2.1 TASD Tracking Performance The detector has been simulated with GEANT4. The model included individual scintillator strips, and the digitisation assumed a readout performance based on measurements made with prototype scintillator for the MINERνA experiment [3]. A uniform 0.5T magnetic field was used for the simulation and reconstruction. Individual muons were simulated with initial momentum between 100 MeV/c and 5 GeV/c. Monte Carlo truth information was used to aid the pattern recognition and the resulting set of space points was passed to a Kalman Filter [4] to fit the track. The reconstructed position resolution was determined to be approximately 4.5 mm 2

RMS. The charge misidentification rate was determined by fitting each track twice, once with the correct charge and again with the incorrect charge. The misidentification rate was determined by counting the number of tracks in which the fit made with the incorrect sign had a better χ 2 per degree of freedom than that made with the correct sign. The charge misidentification rate was approximately 2-3 X 10-5 for muon momenta greater than 400 MeV/c. Neutrino interactions were generated with the NUANCE code [5] and input into the GEANT4 simulation of the TASD in order to study the detector efficiency for charged current interactions. The reconstruction efficiency for ν µ charged current events is high above neutrino energy of 500 MeV, reaching a plateau of approximately 98% for neutrino interaction energy > 2 GeV. The charge mis-identification rate, neutrino reconstruction efficiency and neutrino energy resolution from the simulations were used to determine the physics reach of the TASD at a low energy neutrino factory [2]. This analysis showed that the combination of the low energy neutrino factory with the low energy threshold TASD is a powerful tool for studying neutrino oscillations through the golden channel. 2.2 TASD Electron ID Capability In order to study the potential for the TASD to analyze electron neutrino interactions, and hence access the platinum channel, simulations were made of isolated positrons, with initial momenta ranging between 100 MeV/c and 4.9 GeV/c. In this study the point reconstruction was simulated by randomly discarding hits to simulate the point reconstruction efficiency and then smearing the remaining hits with the position resolution determined from the muon studies. These smeared points were then presented in the form of an event display which showed the position perpendicular to the magnetic field (see Figure 2). Figure 2 An example of the event display produced from the smeared Monte Carlo hits for a positron. The initial momentum was 2.4 GeV/c and despite the straight track seen in the zoomed view of the start of the track (right), it was still possible to correctly determine the direction that the particle bent by looking at the complete event (left). The events were passed through a "blinder" program which randomly flipped the Y axis in the plot and distributed the different momentum bins randomly throughout the range of event numbers. In this way, it was not possible to determine the initial momentum or direction of curvature from the name of the image files. Each of the simulated events was studied independently by four people. They were told to look at the two images of each event and attempt to determine whether the initial particle was curving up or down. A third option of 3

"unable to determine" could also be assigned to each event. In the vast majority of cases, everyone gave the same determination for each event. In rare cases, one person would disagree, in which case the determination for that event was taken as that produced by the majority of people. In approximately 85% of the events, the scanners thought that they could determine the sign of the particle. It was often the case (see Figure 2) that while the stub appeared to be straight, the bending direction of the particle could be obtained from the downstream section of the track following a hard bremsstrahlung and thus and the correct charge assigned. Figure 3 (left) shows that the efficiency for making a determination for the sign from the scan did not depend strongly on the initial momentum. Figure 3 Fraction of events in which the sign could be determined versus the initial momentum (left), fraction of events in which the sign was determined correctly (right). The charge assignment accuracy was determined by using the information produced by the blinding application to extract the true bending direction for each of the event display images. Figure 3 (right) shows the fraction of events in which the charge was identified correctly. It should be noted that this ratio includes all the events for which no charge assignment could be made at all, and shows that at low momentum, almost all the charge assignments were correct. This very quick "by eye" reconstruction seems to be able to determine the charge of the track in approximately 80% of events. The charge is correctly identified almost all the time at low energy and even at 3 GeV/c only 30% of the events are given the wrong sign. The use of a proper track fit to the stub should allow these values to be improved. 3. TASD R&D Needs There are three key components to the TASD that require R&D: 1. Magnet 2. Scintillator production 3. Photo-detector and electronics The concept for the magnetisation of such a large volume is based around the superconducting transmission line (SCTL) developed for the VLHC project [6]. The SCTL consists of an outer vacuum jacket which provides thermal insulation, within which there is a liquid nitrogen shield and an inner pipe for liquid helium. Wrapped around the liquid helium pipe is a 4

superconducting braid. The SCTL concept has been prototyped, tested and costed for the VLHC project at Fermilab. A design for the TASD magnet using SCTL wrapped around a 15 m diameter mandrel that would house the TASD modules has been shown to require half the maximum current that was achieved for the VLHC SCTL and can generate an on-axis field of 0.6 T over most of the length of the detector. The basic concept of the scintillator requires a relatively small R&D program to increase the through-put and efficiency for generating the scintillator. In addition a R&D program to develop a reliable technique to co-extrude wavelength shifting fibre with the scintillator extrusion is envisioned. This technique has been successfully used on post-cladding Kuraray fiber with various polymers. However, in these tests, the post-clad material was much thinner than that which would be needed for a TASD element. The photo-detector and electronics R&D is already occurring around the world. Hamamatsu, RMD and other companies are currently working on Silicon-PM devices (also known as MPPDs or MRSDs). The goal for the TASD would be to reduce the cost per channel to less than $5. 4. Conclusions A low energy Neutrino Factory, coupled with the right detector, gives excellent capability in exploring the full neutrino mixing matrix and measuring leptonic CP violation. A finely segmented TASD is quite possibly the right analysis tool for a low energy Neutrino Factory. Much more simulation and study are required; however the initial results are promising. The detector R&D program required for the TASD is well defined and is dominated by the need to magnetise the large volume. A low energy (4 GeV) Neutrino Factory is certainly cheaper than a 20 GeV Neutrino Factory and with proper planning may even be upgradable to the high energy facility. The TASD performance appears to be impressive and while more study is required, it could even be useful for studying nucleon decay, atmospheric neutrinos and neutrinos from relic supernovae. References [1] A. Bross, M. Ellis, S. Geer, O. Mena, S. Pascoli, "A Neutrino Factory for both large and small theta(13)", Phys. Rev. D77:0933012, 2008. [2] A. Bross, M. Ellis, S. Geer, O. Mena, S. Pascoli, "The low-energy neutrino factory", AIP Conf. Proc. 981:187-189,2008. [3] A. Pla-Dalmau et al., "Extruded plastic scintillator for MINERνA", FERMILAB-CONF-05-506-E, Nov 2005. [4] A. Cervera-Villanueva, J.J. Gomez-Cadenas, J.A. Hernando, "'RecPack' a reconstruction toolkit", Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A534:180-183, 2004. [5] D. Casper, "The Nuance neutrino physics simulation, and the future", Nucl. Phys. Proc. Suppl. 112:161-170, 2002. [6] Ambrosio et al, Fermilab-TM-2149, June, 2001. 5