INTERSECTION THEORY CLASS 2

Similar documents
INTERSECTION THEORY CLASS 6

INTERSECTION THEORY CLASS 1

INTERSECTION THEORY CLASS 7

FOUNDATIONS OF ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY CLASS 41

FOUNDATIONS OF ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY CLASS 27

INTERSECTION THEORY CLASS 19

INTERSECTION THEORY CLASS 12

FOUNDATIONS OF ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY CLASS 26

INTRODUCTION TO ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY, CLASS 14

FOUNDATIONS OF ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY CLASS 48

FOUNDATIONS OF ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY CLASSES 47 AND 48

3. Lecture 3. Y Z[1/p]Hom (Sch/k) (Y, X).

FOUNDATIONS OF ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY CLASS 24

COMPLEX ALGEBRAIC SURFACES CLASS 9

Math 418 Algebraic Geometry Notes

DIVISORS ON NONSINGULAR CURVES

INTERSECTION THEORY CLASS 16

NONSINGULAR CURVES BRIAN OSSERMAN

Algebraic Varieties. Notes by Mateusz Micha lek for the lecture on April 17, 2018, in the IMPRS Ringvorlesung Introduction to Nonlinear Algebra

APPENDIX 3: AN OVERVIEW OF CHOW GROUPS

FOUNDATIONS OF ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY CLASS 18

FOUNDATIONS OF ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY CLASS 43

FOUNDATIONS OF ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY CLASS 5

CHAPTER 0 PRELIMINARY MATERIAL. Paul Vojta. University of California, Berkeley. 18 February 1998

COMPLEX VARIETIES AND THE ANALYTIC TOPOLOGY

ABSTRACT NONSINGULAR CURVES

FOUNDATIONS OF ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY CLASSES 43 AND 44

FOUNDATIONS OF ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY CLASSES 51 AND 52

FOUNDATIONS OF ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY CLASS 24

AN EXPOSITION OF THE RIEMANN ROCH THEOREM FOR CURVES

CHEVALLEY S THEOREM AND COMPLETE VARIETIES

FOUNDATIONS OF ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY CLASS 27

Introduction to Arithmetic Geometry Fall 2013 Lecture #18 11/07/2013

INTRODUCTION TO ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY, CLASS 1. Contents 1. Commutative algebra 2 2. Algebraic sets 2 3. Nullstellensatz (theorem of zeroes) 4

FOUNDATIONS OF ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY CLASS 37

3. The Sheaf of Regular Functions

NOTES ON FLAT MORPHISMS AND THE FPQC TOPOLOGY

DESCENT THEORY (JOE RABINOFF S EXPOSITION)

A SHORT PROOF OF ROST NILPOTENCE VIA REFINED CORRESPONDENCES

INTRODUCTION TO ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY, CLASS 23

BEZOUT S THEOREM CHRISTIAN KLEVDAL

MA 206 notes: introduction to resolution of singularities

Chern classes à la Grothendieck

Summer Algebraic Geometry Seminar

PROBLEMS, MATH 214A. Affine and quasi-affine varieties

Algebraic Geometry Spring 2009

10. Smooth Varieties. 82 Andreas Gathmann

AN INTRODUCTION TO AFFINE SCHEMES

FOUNDATIONS OF ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY CLASS 37

ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY COURSE NOTES, LECTURE 9: SCHEMES AND THEIR MODULES.

FOUNDATIONS OF ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY CLASS 2

Preliminary Exam Topics Sarah Mayes

MATH 233B, FLATNESS AND SMOOTHNESS.

Exploring the Exotic Setting for Algebraic Geometry

Homework 6 Solution. Math 113 Summer 2016.

div(f ) = D and deg(d) = deg(f ) = d i deg(f i ) (compare this with the definitions for smooth curves). Let:

Algebraic varieties and schemes over any scheme. Non singular varieties

LECTURE 7: STABLE RATIONALITY AND DECOMPOSITION OF THE DIAGONAL

Algebraic Geometry I Lectures 14 and 15

FOUNDATIONS OF ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY CLASS 2

Reid 5.2. Describe the irreducible components of V (J) for J = (y 2 x 4, x 2 2x 3 x 2 y + 2xy + y 2 y) in k[x, y, z]. Here k is algebraically closed.

Curtis Heberle MTH 189 Final Paper 12/14/2010. Algebraic Groups

(dim Z j dim Z j 1 ) 1 j i

Math 6140 Notes. Spring Codimension One Phenomena. Definition: Examples: Properties:

Lecture 7: Etale Fundamental Group - Examples

CRing Project, Chapter 7

Algebra Homework, Edition 2 9 September 2010

π X : X Y X and π Y : X Y Y

Vector bundles in Algebraic Geometry Enrique Arrondo. 1. The notion of vector bundle

Diagonal Arithmetics. An introduction : Chow groups.

LECTURES ON SYMPLECTIC REFLECTION ALGEBRAS

MA257: INTRODUCTION TO NUMBER THEORY LECTURE NOTES

Exercises of the Algebraic Geometry course held by Prof. Ugo Bruzzo. Alex Massarenti

Chow groups of Zero-Cycles Relative to Hyperplane Arrangements. Karl-Dieter Crisman

CHEAT SHEET: PROPERTIES OF MORPHISMS OF SCHEMES

FOUNDATIONS OF ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY CLASS 21

A Humble Example of Notions of Divisor

Lecture 3: Flat Morphisms

DEFORMATIONS VIA DIMENSION THEORY

ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY I, FALL 2016.

Algebraic Cobordism Lecture 1: Complex cobordism and algebraic cobordism

Math 145. Codimension

HARTSHORNE EXERCISES

MATH 8253 ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY WEEK 12

HYPERSURFACES IN PROJECTIVE SCHEMES AND A MOVING LEMMA

Zero-cycles on surfaces

Elliptic curves over function fields 1

DIVISOR THEORY ON TROPICAL AND LOG SMOOTH CURVES

mult V f, where the sum ranges over prime divisor V X. We say that two divisors D 1 and D 2 are linearly equivalent, denoted by sending

AFFINE PUSHFORWARD AND SMOOTH PULLBACK FOR PERVERSE SHEAVES

FOUNDATIONS OF ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY CLASS 25

1 Flat, Smooth, Unramified, and Étale Morphisms

MATH 8254 ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY HOMEWORK 1

Porteous s Formula for Maps between Coherent Sheaves

ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY COURSE NOTES, LECTURE 2: HILBERT S NULLSTELLENSATZ.

11. Dimension. 96 Andreas Gathmann

0.1 Spec of a monoid

NOTES ON DIMENSION THEORY OF SCHEMES

COMPLEX ALGEBRAIC SURFACES CLASS 15

MODULI SPACES AND DEFORMATION THEORY, CLASS 1. Contents 1. Preliminaries 1 2. Motivation for moduli spaces Deeper into that example 4

Transcription:

INTERSECTION THEORY CLASS 2 RAVI VAKIL CONTENTS 1. Last day 1 2. Zeros and poles 2 3. The Chow group 4 4. Proper pushforwards 4 The webpage http://math.stanford.edu/ vakil/245/ is up, and has last day s notes. The new times starting next week will be Mondays 9 10:50 and Wednesdays 10 10:50. So there will be a class on Friday. To do: read the summaries of Chapters 1 and 2. Looking over today s notes, I realize that what will be newest and most disconcerting for those who haven t seen schemes is the fact that we can localize at the generic point of a subvariety X of a scheme Y. What this means is that we are considering the ring of rational functions defined in a neighborhood of the generic point of X in Y; in other words, they are defined on a dense open subset of X. This is indeed a ring (you can add and multiply). The dimension of this ring is the difference of the dimensions of X and Y (or more precisely dimensions of X and Y near X ). Recall that the points of Y correspond to irreducible subvarieties of Y; the old-fashioned ( before schemes ) points are the closed points in the Zariski topology. So what are the points of Spec O X,Y, or equivalently, what are the prime ideals of the ring O X,Y? They are the irreducible subvarieties of Y containing X. The maximal ideal of this local ring corresponds to X itself. 1. LAST DAY 1.1. Examples. I showed you some examples. For example: Parabola x = y 2 projected to t-line. Q[t] Q[x, y]/(x y 2 ) via t x. (I m letting my field be Q for the moment.) Intersecting parabola with a vertical line x = α. We get the scheme Date: Wednesday, September 29, 2004. Spec Q[x, y]/(x y 2, x α) = Spec Q[y]/(y 2 α) 1

which is length 2 over the base field Q. If α = 1, we get 2 points: Q[y]/(y 2 α) = (K[y]/(y + 1)) (K[y]/(y 1)) If α = 0, we get 1 point, with multiplicity 2: Q[y]/(y 2 ) has only one maximal ideal. If α = 2, we get 1 point with multiplicity 1, but this point has degree 2 over Q ; the residue field is a degree 2 extension of Q. 1.2. Strategy. We re going to define Chow groups of a variety X as cycles modulo homotopy (called rational equivalence). Dimension k cycles are easy: they are dimension k subvarieties of X. More subtle is rational equivalence. (1) Two points on P 1 are defined to be rationaly equivalent. (2) If X Y is flat then there is a pullback. π : X Y, dim X = dim Y + d, then π : H n (Y) H n+d (X). (3) If X Y is proper (new definition!) then we have a pushforward: X Y, π : H n (X) H n (Y). Just to be clear before we start: throughout this course we ll work over a field, to be denoted K. We ll consider schemes X that are sometimes called algebraic schemes over K. They are schemes of finite type over K. This means that you get them by gluing together a finite number of affine schemes of the form Spec K[x 1,..., x n ]/I. Mild generalization of algebraic variety. All morphisms between algebraic schemes are separated and of finite type. In this language, a variety is a reduced irreducible algebraic scheme. We ll end up localizing schemes: this leads to the notation of essentially of finite type = localizations of schemes/rings of finite type. 2. ZEROS AND POLES Given a rational function on an irreducible variety X, I ll define its order of pole or zero along a codimension 1 variety. (A rational function is a(n algebraic) function on some dense (Zariski-)open set. ) An irreducible codimension 1 variety is called a Weil divisor. Example: (x 1) 2 (x 2 2)/(x 3) over C. Over Q. Weil divisors. If X is generically nonsingular=smooth along Weil divisor, then the same thing will work. More precicsely, in this case the local ring along the subvariety is dimension 1, with m/m 2 = 1, i.e. it is a discrete valuation ring, which I ll assume you ve seen. Discrete valuation rings are certain local rings (A, m). Here are some characterizations: an integral domain in which every ideal is principal over K a regular local ring of dimension 1 a dimension 1 local ring that is integrally closed in its fraction field 2

etc. If generator of m is π, then the ideals are all of the form (π n ) or 0. The corresponding scheme as 2 points; it is the germ of a smooth curve. Examples: K[x, y], localized along divisor x = 0. We get rational functions of the form f(x, y)/g(x, y) where x is not a factor of g. This is a local ring, and it is a DVR! Given any rational function, you can tell me the order of poles or zeros. (Ask: (x 2 3y)/(x 2 + x 4 y)?) Then this also works if x is replaced by some other irreducible polynomial, e.g. x 2 3y. This is nice and multiplicative. So what if X is singular along that divisor (dim m/m 2 > 1)? Example: y 2 = x 3 x 2, the rational function y/x. Exercise. Consider y/x on y 2 = x 3. What is the order of this pole/zero? (This will be homework, due date TBA.) Patch 1: If V is a Weil divisor, and r is a rational function that gives an element of the local ring O V,X, then define ord V (r) = dim K O V,X /(r). (What it means to be in the local ring, intuitively: at a general point of V it is defined. More precisely: there is an open set meeting V not necessarily containing it where the rational function is an actual function. For example, x/y on Spec K[x, y] is defined near the generic point of x = 0. Language of generic points.) Then given a general rational function, f, we can always write it as f = r 1 /r 2, where r 1 and r 2 lie in the local ring. (But we need to check that if we write f as a fraction in two different ways, then the answer is the same. That s true. More on that in a minute.) Technical problem: If you have a dimension 1 local ring (A, m) with quotient field K, then A isn t necessarily a K-vector space. Z (p), pz (p). (Exercise: Find an example in characteristic 0.) Better: ord V (r) = l OV,X (O V,X /(r)). Recall length is the one more than the length of the longest series of nested modules you can fit in a row. So the length of a vector space over K is its dimension. Fact: ord is well-defined (Appendix A.3): If ab = cd then l(a/(a)) + l(a/(b)) = l(a/(c)) + l(a/(d)). Hence this thing is well-defined. Facts about facts. (I will pull facts out of Fulton s appendix as black boxes. But if you take a look at the appendix, you ll see that these results are very easy. The vast majority of proofs in A.1 A.5 are no longer than a few lines. With the exception of the section on determinantal identities which we likely won t use in this course I think almost no proof is longer than half a page. He even has a crash course in algebraic geometry in Appendix B.) 3

Fact: finiteness of zeros and poles (Appendix B.4.3). For a given r, there are only a finite number of Weil divisors V where ord V (r) 0. 3. THE CHOW GROUP Let X be an algebraic scheme (again: finite type over field K). Recall: A k-cycle is a finite formal sum n i [V i ], n i Z. A cycle is positive if all n i 0, some n i > 0. (I forgot to mention this.) Call this Z k [X], the group of k-cycles. { } Z k [X] = ni [V i ], n i Z. For any (k + 1)-dimensional subvariety W of X, and any nonzero rational function r R(W), define a K-cycle on X by [div(r)] = ord V (r)[v]. This generates a subgroup Rat k X, the subgroup of cycles rationally equivalent to 0. (You can probably see where I m going to go with this.) Define (Say visually.) A k (X) = Z k [X]/ Rat k [X] Note: this definition doesn t care about any nonreduced structure on X: A k [X] A k [X red ]. 4. PROPER PUSHFORWARDS Next day we ll see that rational equivalence pushes forward under proper maps. First: 4.1. Crash course in proper morphisms:. A morphism f : X Y is said to be proper if it is separated (true in our case of algebraic schemes), of finite type (true in our case), and universally closed. (Closed: takes closed sets to closed sets. Universally closed: for any Y Y, X Y Y Y is closed.) Key examples: projective morphisms are proper. A morphism f : X Y is projective if Y can be covered by opens such that on each open U, f 1 (X) Y U U factors f 1 (X) Y U P k U U where the left morphism is a closed immersion. Finite morphisms are projective, hence proper. A morphism is finite if for each affine open U = Spec S, f 1 (U) is affine = Spec R, and the corresponding map of rings S R is a finite ring extension, i.e. R is a finitely generated S-module (which is stronger than a finitely generated S-algebra!). Example: parabola double-covering line. (How to recognize: finite implies each point of target has finite number of preimages. Reverse implication isn t true. finite = proper plus this property.) Another example: closed immersion. 4

Finite, projective, and proper morphisms are preserved by base change: if f is one of them, then f is too in the following fiber diagram: W f X Y f Z (They are also preserved by composition: f, g proper etc. implies g f is too.) E-mail address: vakil@math.stanford.edu 5