Investigation on mass composition of UHE cosmic rays using CRPropa 2.0

Similar documents
arxiv: v1 [astro-ph.he] 14 Jul 2017

Overview: UHECR spectrum and composition Arrival directions and magnetic field Method for search for UHE nuclei sources Application to the Auger data

Secondary particles generated in propagation neutrinos gamma rays

Implications of cosmic ray results for UHE neutrinos

Ultrahigh Energy Cosmic Rays propagation II

The Physics of Ultrahigh Energy Cosmic Rays. Example Poster Presentation Physics 5110 Spring 2009 Reminder: Posters are due Wed April 29 in class.

Cosmogenic neutrinos II

Ultrahigh Energy cosmic rays II

Open questions with ultra-high energy cosmic rays

Ultra High Energy Cosmic Rays What we have learnt from. HiRes and Auger. Andreas Zech Observatoire de Paris (Meudon) / LUTh

Ultra High Energy Cosmic Rays: Observations and Analysis

Cosmic Ray Astronomy. Qingling Ni

Extensive Air Showers and Particle Physics Todor Stanev Bartol Research Institute Dept Physics and Astronomy University of Delaware

STATUS OF ULTRA HIGH ENERGY COSMIC RAYS

99 Years from Discovery : What is our current picture on Cosmic Rays? #6 How cosmic rays travel to Earth? Presented by Nahee Park

Absorption and production of high energy particles in the infrared background

Cosmic ray studies at the Yakutsk EAS array: energy spectrum and mass composition

Ultra High Energy Cosmic Rays I

Ultra-High-Energy Cosmic Rays: A Tale of Two Observatories

IMPACT OF OSCILLATIONS ON UHE NEUTRINO ASTRONOMY

Mass Composition Study at the Pierre Auger Observatory

Search for clustering of ultra high energy cosmic rays from the Pierre Auger Observatory

Interpretation of the energy spectrum observed with the Telescope Array surface detectors

Ultra-High Energy Cosmic Rays and the GeV-TeV Diffuse Gamma-Ray Flux

RESULTS FROM THE PIERRE AUGER OBSERVATORY

STUDY ON MASS COMPOSITION OF EXTENSIVE AIR SHOWER WITH ULTRA HIGH ENERGY COSMIC RAYS USING Q PARAMETER AND THEIR MUON COMPONENT

Ultra-High Energy Cosmic Rays and Astrophysics. Hang Bae Kim Hanyang University Hangdang Workshop,

Cosmic Rays: high/low energy connections

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph.he] 14 Nov 2011

On the GCR/EGCR transition and UHECR origin

A few grams of matter in a bright world

The Pierre Auger Observatory Status - First Results - Plans

Parameters Sensitive to the Mass Composition of Cosmic Rays and Their Application at the Pierre Auger Observatory

> News < AMS-02 will be launched onboard the Shuttle Endeavour On May 2nd 2:33 P.M. from NASA Kennedy space center!

Ultra-High Energy Cosmic Rays & Neutrinos above the Terascale

arxiv:hep-ph/ v2 23 Sep 1998

STUDY OF EXTENSIVE AIR SHOWERS IN THE EARTH S ATMOSPHERE

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph.he] 27 Dec 2018

The AUGER Experiment. D. Martello Department of Physics University of Salento & INFN Lecce. D. Martello Dep. of Physics Univ. of Salento & INFN LECCE

Extensive Air Shower and cosmic ray physics above ev. M. Bertaina Univ. Torino & INFN

Ultrahigh Energy Cosmic Rays propagation I

Cosmic Rays. Discovered in 1912 by Viktor Hess using electroscopes to measure ionization at altitudes via balloon

Implications of recent cosmic ray results for ultrahigh energy neutrinos

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph.he] 22 Aug 2014

Upper Limit of the Spectrum of Cosmic Rays

Cosmic Rays. M. Swartz. Tuesday, August 2, 2011

Studies of Ultra High Energy Cosmic Rays with the Pierre Auger Observatory

Propagation of high-energy cosmic rays in extragalactic turbulent magnetic fields: resulting energy spectrum and composition

Ultra High Energy Cosmic Rays. Malina Kirn March 1, 2007 Experimental Gravitation & Astrophysics

The influence of the observatory latitude on the study of ultra high energy cosmic rays

Air Shower Measurements from PeV to EeV

Hadronic interactions of ultra-high energy cosmic rays

John Ellison University of California, Riverside. Quarknet 2008 at UCR

An Auger Observatory View of Centaurus A

Neutral particles energy spectra for 900 GeV and 7 TeV p-p collisions, measured by the LHCf experiment

UHE Cosmic Rays and Neutrinos with the Pierre Auger Observatory

High Energy Particle Production by Space Plasmas

PEV NEUTRINOS FROM THE PROPAGATION OF ULTRA-HIGH ENERGY COSMIC RAYS. Esteban Roulet CONICET, Bariloche, Argentina

Comparison of UHECR spectra from necklaces and vortons

Extragalactic ultra-high energy cosmic rays II. Comparison with experimental data

Measurement of air shower maxima and p-air cross section with the Telescope Array

Numerical study of the electron lateral distribution in atmospheric showers of high energy cosmic rays

Frontiers: Ultra High Energy Cosmic Rays

Comparison of UHECR spectra from necklaces and vortons

Multi-Messenger Astonomy with Cen A?

Experimental Constraints to high energy hadronic interaction models using the Pierre Auger Observatory part-i

Possible sources of ultrahigh-energy cosmic protons A. V. Uryson

Gamma-ray bursts as the sources of the ultra-high energy cosmic rays?

Detection of Cosmic Rays at Ultra-High Energies with Phase I of the Square Kilometre Array (SKADS) Olaf Scholten and Heino Falcke

arxiv:astro-ph/ v1 17 Dec 2004

Ultra- high energy cosmic rays

The Pierre Auger Project. Angela Olinto University of Chicago

SEARCHES OF VERY HIGH ENERGY NEUTRINOS. Esteban Roulet CONICET, Centro Atómico Bariloche

Cosmic particles with energies above ev: a brief review of results

Recent results from the Pierre Auger Observatory

Ultra-High Energy AstroParticles!

UHECRs sources and the Auger data

White Paper on Ultra-High Energy Cosmic Rays

The Pierre Auger Observatory in 2007

ULTRA-HIGH ENERGY COSMIC RAYS

Very high energy photons and neutrinos: Implications for UHECR

arxiv: v2 [astro-ph.he] 8 Nov 2018

Ultrahigh Energy Cosmic Rays from Tidal Disruption Events: Origin, Survival, and Implications

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph.he] 8 Apr 2015

RECENT RESULTS FROM THE PIERRE AUGER OBSERVATORY

Precision measurements of nuclear CR energy spectra and composition with the AMS-02 experiment

Neutrino Oscillations and Astroparticle Physics (5) John Carr Centre de Physique des Particules de Marseille (IN2P3/CNRS) Pisa, 10 May 2002

Recent Results of the Observatory Pierre Auger. João R. T. de Mello Neto Instituto de Física Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro

Ultra High Energy Cosmic Rays

Propagation in the Galaxy 2: electrons, positrons, antiprotons

Dr. John Kelley Radboud Universiteit, Nijmegen

PoS(ICRC2015)349. TA Spectrum Summary

The Highest Energy Cosmic Rays

arxiv:astro-ph/ v1 28 Oct 2004

PoS(ICRC2015)657. Telescope Array extension: TA 4

Cosmic Rays, their Energy Spectrum and Origin

Highlights from the Pierre Auger Observatory the birth of the Hybrid Era. Introduction

Intergalactic Magnetic Field and Arrival Direction of Ultra-High-Energy Protons

The Pierre Auger Observatory

Lecture 5 - Ultra high energy cosmic rays and the GZK cutoff

Transcription:

Investigation on mass composition of UHE cosmic rays using CRPropa. G Rastegarzade B Parvizi,, Physics Department, Semnan University, Semnan, P.O. Box 596-599, Iran Email: G_ rastegar@alum.sharif.edu Abstract In this paper, we used the Monte Carlo code CRPropa version. to simulate the propagation of UHE cosmic rays. In the simulation, uniform cosmic ray sources with spectral indices of α =., α = and E max = ev for pure iron composition at the source position are assumed. We obtained the logarithmic average mass of cosmic rays as a function of energy and compared it with the experimental values in the ankle, and we demonstrated how the mass composition changes before and after the ankle. Key words: Ultra-high energy cosmic ray propagation, extragalactic magnetic fields, CRPropa, mass composition. PACS numbers: 9, 95.. Introduction The sources and composition of ultra-high energy cosmic rays have not been specifically identified, and efforts continue to solve this mystery. The measurement of mass composition in high energy can help answer current questions about the origin of cosmic rays; in addition, the measurement provides a good clue for determining the causes of the knee, ankle, and GZK cut-off [, ] in the spectrum of the CRs. Fig. : Spectrum of cosmic rays

According to fig, the slope of the curve increases from.7 to. at approximately 5 ev, and the number of particles decreases; this point is known as the knee. In addition, there is a second knee at 7 ev that is not visible in this figure. At 8 ev, the spectrum again experiences a sudden change: the slope decreases to.7, and the number of cosmic rays increases, which can be attributed to new sources in this energy and can be explained using the Larmor radius equation: ( ) ( ) This equation indicates that CRs with energies greater than 8 ev cannot exist in the magnetic field of our galaxy. If the sources are in our galaxy, then the Larmor radius will be greater than the radius of our galaxy, and the CRs will be outside the galaxy. Three models that have been under consideration regarding the subject of shifting from galactic to extragalactic sources are as follows: Ankle model []: this model assumes that transfer occurs in the ankle, that the predominant composition is galaxy sources after the second knee, and that there are protons of extragalactic origin in the ankle. Dip model []: in this model, transfer occurs near the second knee, and there is a compositional change from galactic iron to extragalactic protons at this point; based on this model, there is an ankle because of the energy loss processes, such as pair production and pion production, as a result of proton interactions with the CMB. Mixed composition [5]: this model is similar to the dip model, except it considers the mixing of extragalactic particles instead of extragalactic protons in the place of transmission. In this paper, we used the Monte Carlo code CRPropa version. [6, 7] to perform the simulations. The simulations can be performed either in one-dimensional (D) or three-dimensional (D) mode [8]. The deflections of UHECRs in extragalactic magnetic fields are considered in D mode. In D mode, cosmological and source evolution with redshift can be implemented.. Mass Composition of the CRs The mass composition at ultra-low energies is the same as that of interstellar matter, which contains 9% hydrogen and % helium. Because the flux of cosmic rays decreases at high energies, it is much more complex and difficult to determine the mass composition at these energies. The Fly's Eye HiRes, Yakutsk,

and Auger experiments operate in different energy ranges, and their mass composition results are associated with uncertainties at ultra-high energies. [9] Fig. 8 shows the logarithmic mean mass of cosmic rays as a function of energy for E > 8 ev. We assumed a uniform source with =. and ev for pure iron composition at the source position. The magnetic field for D simulation is equal to. Interactions of particles with the CMB are handled using the SOPHIA [] event generator. Fe N He 8. 8.5 9. 9.5..5..5 P Fig.. Logarithmic mean mass of cosmic rays as a function of energy for pure iron composition, with α =. and ev from a D simulation. Points are from the average data of 5 cosmic rays. As observed in fig., the average mean mass decreases after E = 8 ev and increases after 9 ev, which is consistent with the experimental results from Fly s Eye and Yakutsk experiments. Based on the Fly s Eye experiment, which uses for mass composition determination, the composition is heavy before 8.5 ev and the spectrum is light above this energy []; this transition is called the ankle. The mass composition spectrum changes when crossing the ankle. The Yakutsk experiment found a light spectrum above 8.5 ev [], and the HiRes experiment confirmed this result []. There is more iron at energies below the ankle energy, but the number of protons increases above the ankle energy. This experiment determined the location of the ankle to be at 7.5 ev. The Auger experiment predicts a heavier spectrum at high energies compared with the results of the other experiments [].

. Influence of Magnetic Field on the Mass Composition of the Secondary CRs Magnetic fields can play an important role in propagation and can increase the trajectory length of the particles during their journey from the source to the earth. Deflections of CRs due to the magnetic field are considered in the D simulation, but not in the D case. The redshift evolution of the background and the energy losses due to the adiabatic expansion of the universe are accounted for in the D simulation. To compare the mass of the secondary cosmic rays in the presence of a magnetic field, we obtained the average mass vs. energy for pure iron composition at the sources with α = and.. The results are shown in fig.. 5 5 D D D D Fe N He P - 8. 8.5 9. 9.5..5. - 8. 8.5 9. 9.5..5. Fig.. Logarithmic mean mass of cosmic rays as a function of energy for pure iron composition, with α = (left panel) and α =. (right panel) with ev for a D simulation (circles) and a D simulation (squares). Points are from the average data of 5 cosmic rays. The galactic magnetic field acts as a box for trapping charged particles and deflects them from their path, such that the particles will travel a longer path and undergo further interactions. As the number of interactions increases, the number of particles that decay into lighter particles also increases; as a result, the composition is lighter in the D simulation than it is in the D simulation.. Influence of the Spectral Indices on the Mass Composition of the CRs Figure shows a comparison of the mass composition for two different spectral indices: α = and.. For this comparison, the simulation was performed in both D and D mode for a source with iron composition.

Fe <LnA> N He P - 8. 8.5 9. 9.5..5. - 8. 8.5 9. 9.5..5..5 Fig.. Logarithmic mean mass of cosmic rays as a function of energy for pure iron composition, with α =. (circles) and α = (squares) for ev from a D simulation (left panel) and a D simulation (right panel). Points are from the average data of 5 cosmic rays. As the spectral index increases (from α =. to α = ), the number of particles decreases and the slope of the CR energy spectrum curve, which shows the flux as a function of energy, increases. Thus, a source with a smaller spectral index accelerates more particles to higher energies and is a strong source for the production of high-energy particles. Generally, the numbers of such sources are very small, which can be one of the reasons for the existence of an energy cutoff (GZK cut off) in the cosmic ray spectrum at energies above 6 9 ev. According to fig., the mass composition is lighter when the spectral index is smaller. This behaviour occurs because particles with a smaller spectral index are more energetic than particles with a larger spectral index; thus, they interact more with cosmic microwave background (CMB) photons and the increment of interactions is equal to further decomposition of the nucleus and the conversion of the nucleus into smaller and lighter particles. 5. Conclusions Using the Monte Carlo code CRPropa version., 5 uniform iron and proton sources with ev and =. and were simulated. For the D simulations, the magnetic field is set to ng. We have determined the logarithmic average mass of cosmic rays as a function of energy. We have shown that after the ankle energy ( 8 ev), the mass composition is light and that after 9 ev, it becomes heavy, which is consistent with the experimental results. In addition, we investigated the influence of the magnetic field on the mass composition and demonstrated that in the presence of the magnetic field, the mass composition is lighter because deflections caused by the magnetic field increase the propagation path length, thereby increasing the number of interactions, and the average mass number <A> decreases.

We found that the spectral index has an effect on the mass, i.e., as the spectral index increases (from α =. to α = ), the mass composition becomes heavier. 6. References [] Greisen, K. 966, Phys. Rev. Lett, 6, 78 [] Zatsepin, G. T. Kuzmin, V. A. 966, Sov. Phys. JETP Lett,, 78 [] Wibig, T. Wolfendale, A. W., Available from: <arxiv: 6v>. [] Berezinsky, V. Grigorieva, S. 988, Astronomy & Astrophysics 99, [5] Aloisio, R. Berezinsky, V. S. Gazizov, A., Astrop. Phys, 9-, 9 [6] Https:// crpropa. desy.de/images//5/user Guide.pdf [7] https:// apcauger. inp. fr/crpropa [8] Sigl G, Kulbartz J, Maccioe L et al., nd ICRC () [9] Kampert, K. H. Unger, M., Astroparticle physics 5, 66-678 [] Mucke, A. Engel, R. Rachen, J. P. Protheroe, R. J and Stanev, T., Comput. Phys. Commun,, 9 [] Bird D. J., et al. 99, (the HiRes Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 7,. [] Knurenko, S. P. Sabourov, A., Nuclear Physics B (Proc. Suppl.) -, -5 [] Abbasi R. U.,, Phys. Rev. Lett,, 6 [] Abraham J. et al,, (The Pierre Auger Collaboration), <arxiv:.699v>