The solid state. Ga Ge As Se Br d 10 4s 2. Sn Xe 1.49 I Sb Te In d 10 5s 2. Pb 0.

Similar documents
Lone Pairs in the Solid State

Visualizing lone pairs in compounds containing heavier congeners of the carbon and nitrogen group elements

At the end of this lesson, students should be able to :

bond energy- energy required to break a chemical bond -We can measure bond energy to determine strength of interaction

Molecular Geometry. Dr. Williamson s Molecular Geometry Notes. VSEPR: Definition of Terms. Dr. V.M. Williamson Texas A & M University Student Version

Molecular Geometry. Dr. Williamson s Molecular Geometry Notes. VSEPR: Definition of Terms. VSEPR: Electronic Geometries VSEPR

Ch. 9 NOTES ~ Chemical Bonding NOTE: Vocabulary terms are in boldface and underlined. Supporting details are in italics.

Review questions CHAPTER 5. Practice exercises 5.1 F F 5.3

CHAPTER TEN MOLECULAR GEOMETRY MOLECULAR GEOMETRY V S E P R CHEMICAL BONDING II: MOLECULAR GEOMETRY AND HYBRIDIZATION OF ATOMIC ORBITALS

Chapter 9 Molecular Geometry and Bonding Theories

Section 12: Lewis Structures

General and Inorganic Chemistry I.

Materials 218/UCSB: Phase transitions and polar materials

Unit 3 - Chemical Bonding and Molecular Structure

Chemical Bonding II: Molecular Geometry and Hybridization of Atomic Orbitals Chapter 1

Example: Write the Lewis structure of XeF 4. Example: Write the Lewis structure of I 3-. Example: Select the favored resonance structure of the PO 4

Chemical Bonding II: Molecular Geometry and Hybridization of Atomic Orbitals

Subtopic 4.2 MOLECULAR SHAPE AND POLARITY

Molecular Geometry. Valence Shell Electron Pair. What Determines the Shape of a Molecule? Repulsion Theory (VSEPR) Localized Electron Model

: Bond Order = 1.5 CHAPTER 5. Practice Questions

CHEM 101: CHAPTER 11: CHEMICAL BONDS: THE FORMATION OF COMPOUNDS FROM ATOMS

Molecular Geometry & Polarity

Experiment 15. The Valence Shell Electron Pair Repulsion (VSEPR) Theory of Directed Valency: An exercise

Chemical Bonding II. Molecular Geometry Valence Bond Theory Phys./Chem. Properties Quantum Mechanics Sigma & Pi bonds Hybridization MO theory

Chapter 9. Molecular Geometry and Bonding Theories

Ch 6 Chemical Bonding

All chemical bonding is based on the following relationships of electrostatics: 2. Each period on the periodic table

Chapter 11 Chemical Bonds: The Formation of Compounds from Atoms Advanced Chemistry Periodic Trends in Atomic Properties Learning Objective

Bonding - Ch. 7. Types of Bonding

Adapted from CHM 130 Maricopa County, AZ Molecular Geometry and Lewis Dot Formulas Introduction

Chapters 8 and 9. Octet Rule Breakers Shapes

Chapter 8 Test Study Guide AP Chemistry 6 points DUE AT TEST (Wed., 12/13/17) Date:

Ionic and Covalent Bonding

Chapter 9. Molecular Geometry and Bonding Theories

Bonding - Ch Types of Bonding

5 Polyatomic molecules

Unit Six --- Ionic and Covalent Bonds

Chemical Bonding II: Molecular Geometry and Hybridization of Atomic Orbitals

Chemical Bonding II: Molecular Geometry and Hybridization of Atomic Orbitals Chapter 10

Molecular Geometry and Bonding Theories. Chapter 9

Chem 1075 Chapter 12 Chemical Bonding Lecture Outline. Chemical Bond Concept

Chapter 9 Molecular Geometry and Bonding Theories

Chapter 10: Modern Atomic Theory and the Periodic Table. How does atomic structure relate to the periodic table? 10.1 Electromagnetic Radiation

Bonding/Lewis Dots Lecture Page 1 of 12 Date. Bonding. What is Coulomb's Law? Energy Profile: Covalent Bonds. Electronegativity and Linus Pauling

CHEMICAL BONDING. Chemical Bonds. Ionic Bonding. Lewis Symbols

Drawing Good Lewis Structures. Molecular Shape

Chapter 8. Bonding: General Concepts. Copyright 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.

Chapter 13: Phenomena

Chapter 6 PRETEST: Chemical Bonding

Chemical Bonding. Section 1 Introduction to Chemical Bonding. Section 2 Covalent Bonding and Molecular Compounds

Chapter 6. Preview. Objectives. Molecular Compounds

Chapter Eight. p328. Bonding: General Concepts

Covalent Bonding. In nature, only the noble gas elements exist as uncombined atoms. All other elements need to lose or gain electrons

8.1 Types of Chemical Bonds List and define three types of bonding. chapter 8 Bonding General Concepts.notebook. September 10, 2015

1. Following Dalton s Atomic Theory, 2. In 1869 Russian chemist published a method. of organizing the elements. Mendeleev showed that

Chapter 13: Phenomena

CHAPTER 12 CHEMICAL BONDING

Chemistry and the material world Lecture 3

Cartoon courtesy of NearingZero.net. Chemical Bonding and Molecular Structure

A Simple Model for Chemical Bonds

Covalent Bonding. In nature, only the noble gas elements exist as uncombined atoms. All other elements need to lose or gain electrons

Pauli Principle. ! This requirement (which has no theoretical proof) does not change the overall state of the system.

Chapter 9: Chemical Bonding I: Lewis Theory. Lewis Theory: An Overview

We study bonding since it plays a central role in the understanding of chemical reactions and understanding the chemical & physical properties.

Chapter 6. The Chemical Bond

What is a Bond? Chapter 8. Ionic Bonding. Coulomb's Law. What about covalent compounds?

CHEMISTRY - MCMURRY 7E CH.7 - COVALENT BONDING AND ELECTRON DOT STRUCTURES

Fill in the chart below to determine the valence electrons of elements 3-10

Molecular Geometry and Bonding Theories. Molecular Shapes. Molecular Shapes. Chapter 9 Part 2 November 16 th, 2004

Carbon and Its Compounds

Chapter 10: Chemical Bonding II. Bonding Theories

Cartoon courtesy of NearingZero.net. Unit 3: Chemical Bonding and Molecular Structure

Check Your Solution A comparison with the figures in Figure 4.31 on page 234 of the student textbook confirms the results.

Chapter 7. Chemical Bonding I: Basic Concepts

What Do Molecules Look Like?

Hey, Baby. You and I Have a Bond...Ch. 8

Microscopic Mechanism of Stereochemically Active Lone Pair Studied from Orbital Selective External Potential Calculation

; (c) [Li] [: O :] [Li]. 5a. The electrostatic potential map that corresponds to IF is the one with the most red in it. ... C C H

VSEPR. Valence Shell Electron Pair Repulsion Theory

Chapter 9. Chemical Bonding II: Molecular Geometry and Bonding Theories

4/25/2017. VSEPR Theory. Two Electron Groups. Shapes of Molecules. Two Electron Groups with Double Bonds. Three Electron Groups.

Cartoon courtesy of NearingZero.net. Chemical Bonding and Molecular Structure

Covalent Bonding. Click a hyperlink or folder tab to view the corresponding slides. Exit

Bonding: Part Two. Three types of bonds: Ionic Bond. transfer valence e - Metallic bond. (NaCl) (Fe) mobile valence e - Covalent bond

of its physical and chemical properties.

Chapter 12 Structures and Characteristics of Bonds Objectives

CHEM 172 EXAMINATION 2. February 12, Dr. Kimberly M. Broekemeier NAME: l = 2r l = 8 1/2 r l = (4/3 1/2 )r. h = 6.

Name Date Class STUDY GUIDE FOR CONTENT MASTERY. covalent bond molecule sigma bond exothermic pi bond

CHEM 130 Exp. 8: Molecular Models

Chapter 9. Molecular Geometry and Bonding Theories

Chapter 7 Electron Configuration and the Periodic Table

Aspects of Bonding & Acid Strength

Bonding: Part Two. Three types of bonds: Ionic Bond. transfer valence e - Metallic bond. (NaCl) (Fe) mobile valence e - Covalent bond

Chapter 7. Ionic & Covalent Bonds

PERIODIC PROPERTIES Chapter 8

SMK SULTAN ISMAIL JB, NUR FATHIN SUHANA BT AYOB

Application of density functional theory to real materials problems. Nicola Spaldin Materials Department, UCSB

Name: Period: Date: What Is VSEPR? Now explore the Compare Two Structures link. Try changing the display to explore different combinations.

Chapter 6. Preview. Lesson Starter Objectives Chemical Bond

UNIVERSITY OF VICTORIA. CHEMISTRY 101 Mid-Term Test 2, November

Transcription:

Molecular shape The shapes of molecules: van t Hoff (1874): CH 4 tetrahedron Werner (1893): Pt(NH 3 ) 2 Cl 2 planar Lewis (1915): Electron pairs and octets Sidgwick and Powell (1940): Foundations of Valence Shell Electron Pair Repulsion theory Bonding pairs and lone pairs are of equal importance and these distribute themselves to minimize interelectron repulsion Problems, for example, with the deviation from tetrahedral angles in H 2 O and NH 3 Proc. R. Soc. London A 176 (1940) 153

VSEPR Gillespie and Nyholm (1957): (1) that a lone pair repels electron pairs more than a bonding pair of electrons, (2) that a double bond repels other bonds more than a single bond; (3)... The tendency of the electrons pairs in a valency shell to keep apart is mainly due to the exclusion principle. Problems: Fails for XeO 3 Quart. Rev. Chem. Soc. 11 (1957) 339

The solid state Hyde and Andersson, Inorganic Crystal Structures, Wiley (1988): In many crystalline solids with cation-centered lone pairs, the lone pair occupies the same volume as an oxide or fluoride ion. However the cation-lone pair distance (in Å) is much shorter than the cation-anion distance: 1+ 2+ 3+ 4+ 5+ 6+ 3d 10 4s 2 Ga 0.95 Ge 1.05 As 1.26 Se 1.22 Br 1.47 4d 10 5s 2 In 0.86 Sn 0.95 Sb 1.06 Te 1.25 I 1.23 Xe 1.49 5d 10 6s 2 Tl 0.69 Pb 0.86 Bi 0.98 Po 1.06 Polyhedra of anions and lone pairs must have off-centric cations.

Andersson & Galy vs. Gillespie & Nyholm Traditional view Modified/corrected

Why is this important? Cation-centered lone pairs (often with Pb 2+ as the central cation, but also Sn 2+ and Bi 3+ ) are tremendously important for applications requiring off-centered polyhedra and their associated dipoles: Ferroelectric and piezoelectric materials, actuators Multiferroic materials Non-linear optical materials Ionic conductors High-refractive index materials (lead crystal) Semiconductor/semimetal to insulator transitions Phosphors (?)

This talk Density Functional calculations of the electronic structure of crystals, combined with special tools for visualization of lone pairs: What constitutes a lone pair? When are lone pairs stereochemically active? Lone pairs and inert pairs What is the cooperative behavior of lone pairs? Can lone pairs be used to design polar polyhedra? Can lone pairs be frustrated? DFT: Stuttgart TB-LMTO-ASA program [O. K. Andersen, O. Jepsen etc.] Electron localization functions (ELFs): An orbital independent measure of electron localization based on the pair probability of electrons. A. D. Becke and K. E. Edgecombe J. Chem. Phys. 92 (1990) 5397

The ELF with and α-pbo BiOF B. Silvi and A. Savin, Nature 371 (1994) 683. J.-M. Raulot, G. Baldinozzi, R. Seshadri, and P. Cortona, Solid State Sciences 4 (2002) 467; R. Seshadri, Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. (Chem. Sci.) 113 (2001) 487.

NH 3 Electron density decorated by the ELF

XeO 3 Three-coordinate Xe, is described by Sten Andersson as being Xe outside a trigonal prism.

What is the composition of the lone pair? Orgel (1959): The lone pair cannot have purely s character when it is stereochemically active; it must admix with p. Bersuker (1984): Filled anion p states must play a role. anion p filled cation s & p empty typical oxide (BaO) cation s filled anion p filled cation p empty lone pair oxide (PbO) energy

What is the composition of the lone pair? A lone pair sorted structural field (IV-VI semiconductors): S Se Te massicot Ge GeS GeSe GeTe Sn SnS SnSe SnTe Pb PbS PbSe PbTe arsenic U. Waghmare, N. A. Spaldin, H. C. Kandpal, and R. Seshadri, Phys. Rev. B. 67 (2003) 125111. rock salt

What is the composition of the lone pair? Electronic structure of cubic AQ S Se Te Ge GeS GeSe GeTe Sn SnS SnSe SnTe Pb PbS PbSe PbTe When the lone pair is stereochemically active (as in GeS), cation s states are broader and are better mixed with anion p states. The mixing is intermediated by empty cation p. Cation s states are narrow and largely unmixed with anion p in cases when the lone pair is not stereochemically active (Cf. the inert pair effect).

Cooperative behavior The expression of cooperative stereochemical activity of the lone pair plays an important role in the development of polar behavior. PbTiO 3 above 766 K Pm-3m PbTiO 3 below 766 K P4mm Seshadri, Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. (Chem. Sci.) 113 (2001) 487. Even above the phase transition, the Pb 2+ ion (in Pb 2 NbYbO 6 ) is not really where it is supposed to be. Baldinozzi, Raulot, Seshadri, MRS Symp. Proc. 718 (2002) D12.7.1.

Lone pair cooperativity Octahedral rotations coupled with lone pair activity make PbZrO 3 antiferrodistortive (antipolar). PbZrO 3 below 503 K Pbam R. Seshadri, Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. (Chem. Sci.) 113 (2001) 487.

Lone pair cooperativity Pb 2 MnWO 6 Cubic paraelectric 445 K Orthorhombic antiferroelectric Pb 2 CoWO 6 Cubic paraelectric 300 K Incommensurate antiferroelectric 230 K Ferroelectric Pb 2 MgWO 6 Lone pair & d 0 SOJT distortions strongly coupled Pb 2 YbNbO 6

Multiferroics ABO 3 perovskites where A is lone pair active and is associated with ferroelectricity, while B is magnetic and associated with ferromagnetism BiMnO 3 : T. Atou, H. Chiba, K. Ohoyama, Y. Yamaguchi, and Y. Syono, J. Solid State Chem. 145 (1999) 639; R. Seshadri and N. A. Hill, Chem. Mater. 13 (2001) 2829.

Multiferroics Structural relaxation (DFT-LDA and DFT-LDA+U) indicates that the polar structure is actually not stable for BiMnO 3. P. Baettig, R. Seshadri and N. A. Spaldin, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 129 (2007) 9854-9855. C2/c C2

Lone pairs and d 0 ions

Lone Pairs: Constitution; Sn 2+ vs. Pb 2+ vs. Bi 3+ in ternary systems Interactions that drive lone pair activity in more complex (than binary) systems: What are the periodic trends in lone pair activity? What is the cooperative/competitive nature of A O M networks? Experiments and calculations on ternary compounds: lone pair + d 0 + oxygen Scheelite (I4 1 /a) type β-snwo 4 (P213) Zircon (I4 1 /amd) type PbWO 4 (inactive) SnWO 4 (active) BiVO 4 (active) Why are these structures so different? β-snwo4 is quite unique.

Lone Pairs: Constitution; Sn 2+ vs. Pb 2+ vs. Bi 3+ in ternary systems E g = 2.9 ev cation s anion p antibonding cation s anion p bonding With Sn 2+ there is hybridization and covalency between the Sn 6s, Sn 6p and O 2p orbitals. This leads to a highly stereoactive, localized lone pair. Pb 2+ in PbWO 4 does no show these features no lone pair activity ( inert ).

Lone Pairs: Constitution; Sn 2+ vs. Pb 2+ vs. Bi 3+ in ternary systems The differences arise because of energy levels are distinct (5s vs. 6s) and because of differences in charge: 2+ vs. 3+. In addition, how strongly oxygen bonds the second cation. Pb 2+ inert Sn 2+ covalent s and p Bi 3+ inert s and covalent p cation p anion p cation s M. W. Stoltzfus, P. M. Woodward, R. Seshadri, J.-H. Klepeis, and B. Bursten, Inorg. Chem. 46 (2007) 3839.