Titelmaster. Geometrical and Kinematical Precise Orbit Determination of GOCE

Similar documents
Test Computations

Fall 2013 Physics 172 Recitation 3 Momentum and Springs

and the Doppler frequency rate f R , can be related to the coefficients of this polynomial. The relationships are:

Physics 2010 Motion with Constant Acceleration Experiment 1

Lower Limb Stiffness Estimation during Running: The Effect of Using Kinematic Constraints in Muscle Force Optimization Algorithms

Professional Development. Implementing the NGSS: High School Physics

Yeu-Sheng Paul Shiue, Ph.D 薛宇盛 Professor and Chair Mechanical Engineering Department Christian Brothers University 650 East Parkway South Memphis, TN

Chapter 2. Kinematics in One Dimension. Kinematics deals with the concepts that are needed to describe motion.

Flipping Physics Lecture Notes: Simple Harmonic Motion Introduction via a Horizontal Mass-Spring System

Flipping Physics Lecture Notes: Simple Harmonic Motion Introduction via a Horizontal Mass-Spring System

Figure 1a. A planar mechanism.

7 TH GRADE MATH STANDARDS

1 Course Notes in Introductory Physics Jeffrey Seguritan

NGSS High School Physics Domain Model

AP Physics Kinematic Wrap Up

SPH3U1 Lesson 06 Kinematics

Q x = cos 1 30 = 53.1 South

NUMBERS, MATHEMATICS AND EQUATIONS

Kepler's Laws of Planetary Motion

Lab 1 The Scientific Method

Conceptual Dynamics SDC. An Interactive Text and Workbook. Kirstie Plantenberg Richard Hill. Better Textbooks. Lower Prices.

SOLUTION OF THREE-CONSTRAINT ENTROPY-BASED VELOCITY DISTRIBUTION

Kinematic transformation of mechanical behavior Neville Hogan

Faculty of Engineering and Department of Physics Engineering Physics 131 Midterm Examination February 27, 2006; 7:00 pm 8:30 pm

Image Processing Adam Finkelstein & Tim Weyrich Princeton University

BASD HIGH SCHOOL FORMAL LAB REPORT

Computational modeling techniques

SAMPLING DYNAMICAL SYSTEMS

A study on GPS PDOP and its impact on position error

Space Shuttle Ascent Mass vs. Time

= m. Suppose the speed of a wave on a string is given by v = Κ τμ

Consistency of antenna products in the MGEX environment

(1.1) V which contains charges. If a charge density ρ, is defined as the limit of the ratio of the charge contained. 0, and if a force density f

DESIGN OPTIMIZATION OF HIGH-LIFT CONFIGURATIONS USING A VISCOUS ADJOINT-BASED METHOD

Free Vibrations of Catenary Risers with Internal Fluid

Homework 1 AERE355 Fall 2017 Due 9/1(F) NOTE: If your solution does not adhere to the format described in the syllabus, it will be grade as zero.

AC : ANALYTICAL SYNTHESIS AND ANALYSIS OF MECHANISMS USING MATLAB AND SIMULINK

14. Which shows the direction of the centripetal force acting on a mass spun in a vertical circle?

Eric Klein and Ning Sa

CHAPTER 4 Dynamics: Newton s Laws of Motion /newtlaws/newtltoc.html

EFFECTS OF WALL ORIENTATION AND THERMAL INSULATION ON TIME LAG AND DECREMENT FACTOR

PHYSICS Unit 3 Trial Examination

Study Group Report: Plate-fin Heat Exchangers: AEA Technology

14. Which shows the direction of the centripetal force acting on a mass spun in a vertical circle?

Exercise 3 Identification of parameters of the vibrating system with one degree of freedom

Computational modeling techniques

o o IMPORTANT REMINDERS Reports will be graded largely on their ability to clearly communicate results and important conclusions.

CHAPTER 8b Static Equilibrium Units

Phys101 Final Code: 1 Term: 132 Wednesday, May 21, 2014 Page: 1

. (7.1.1) This centripetal acceleration is provided by centripetal force. It is directed towards the center of the circle and has a magnitude

Kinetics of Particles. Chapter 3

ENSC Discrete Time Systems. Project Outline. Semester

A Study Extracting Information on Ground Objects from Characteristics of Space Thermal Distribution

Computational modeling techniques

Introductory Thoughts

205MPa and a modulus of elasticity E 207 GPa. The critical load 75kN. Gravity is vertically downward and the weight of link 3 is W3

ANGULAR PARAMETERS OF UNDERMINED GROUND MOVEMENT PROCESS IN UNKNOWN AREAS

Richard A. Luettich, Jr. University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Institute of Marine Sciences 3431 Arendell St. Morehead City, NC 28557

Work, Energy, and Power

Introduction: A Generalized approach for computing the trajectories associated with the Newtonian N Body Problem

making triangle (ie same reference angle) ). This is a standard form that will allow us all to have the X= y=

On Boussinesq's problem

Video Encoder Control

[COLLEGE ALGEBRA EXAM I REVIEW TOPICS] ( u s e t h i s t o m a k e s u r e y o u a r e r e a d y )

Physics 1200 Mechanics, Kinematics, Fluids, Waves

Guaranteeing Reliability with Vibration Simulation and Testing. Dr. Nathan Blattau

Math 302 Learning Objectives

CLASS XI SET A PHYSICS

Modelling of Clock Behaviour. Don Percival. Applied Physics Laboratory University of Washington Seattle, Washington, USA

Chapter 3 Kinematics in Two Dimensions; Vectors

Least Squares Optimal Filtering with Multirate Observations

Physics 212. Lecture 12. Today's Concept: Magnetic Force on moving charges. Physics 212 Lecture 12, Slide 1

( ) + θ θ. ω rotation rate. θ g geographic latitude - - θ geocentric latitude - - Reference Earth Model - WGS84 (Copyright 2002, David T.

More Tutorial at

Physics 321 Solutions for Final Exam

APEX DYNAMICS, INC. Stainless

Solution to HW14 Fall-2002

AP Statistics Practice Test Unit Three Exploring Relationships Between Variables. Name Period Date

OP AMP CHARACTERISTICS

1996 Engineering Systems Design and Analysis Conference, Montpellier, France, July 1-4, 1996, Vol. 7, pp

A Correlation of. to the. South Carolina Academic Standards for Mathematics Precalculus

February 28, 2013 COMMENTS ON DIFFUSION, DIFFUSIVITY AND DERIVATION OF HYPERBOLIC EQUATIONS DESCRIBING THE DIFFUSION PHENOMENA

Modeling the Nonlinear Rheological Behavior of Materials with a Hyper-Exponential Type Function

Chapter 3: Cluster Analysis

Accelerated Chemistry POGIL: Half-life

ESM Geographic Information Systems Winter 2019

LOTNAV: A LOW-THRUST INTERPLANETARY NAVIGATION TOOL

A Mission to Planet Mars Gravity Field Determination

Electric Current and Resistance

NATIONAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE FOR AERONAUTICS

MIDTERM EXAM SOLUTIONS

Beam vibrations: Discrete mass and stiffness models

I understand the new topics for this unit if I can do the practice questions in the textbook/handouts

Phy 213: General Physics III 6/14/2007 Chapter 28 Worksheet 1

Compressibility Effects

Assume that the water in the nozzle is accelerated at a rate such that the frictional effect can be neglected.

Revision: August 19, E Main Suite D Pullman, WA (509) Voice and Fax

Section 6-2: Simplex Method: Maximization with Problem Constraints of the Form ~

Lecture 5: Equilibrium and Oscillations

Concept Category 2. Trigonometry & The Unit Circle

Transcription:

Titelmaster Gemetrical and Kinematical Precise Orbit Determinatin f GOCE Akbar Shabanlui Institute f Gedesy and Geinfrmatin, University f Bnn 7th Octber 2010 Clgne, Germany

Outline Precise Orbit Determinatin (POD) principle Gemetrical Precise Orbit Determinatin (GPOD) Kinematical Precise Orbit Determinatin (KPOD) 2 GOCE Lagrange receiver (clck) Zer difference estimatin prcedure Results Cnclusins

Precise Orbit Determinatin (POD) 3 Credit by ESA

Precise Orbit Determinatin (POD) methds 4 POD

Gemetrical Precise Orbit Determinatin (GPOD) 5

Precise Orbit Determinatin (POD) methds 6 POD

Kinematical Precise Orbit Determinatin (KPOD) 7

Precise Orbit Determinatin (POD) methds Gemetrical POD : pint-wise, psitins!= KPOD, e.g. Bern Kinematical POD : cntinus, psitins, velcities and acceleratins 8 Dynamical POD : cntinus, psitins, velcities and acceleratins based n frce functin infrmatin POD

GPS LAGRANGE receiver nbard GOCE 9 Credit by ESA

GNSS receiver n-bard GOCE 10 Credit by ESA

GNSS receiver n-bard GOCE LAGRANGE (Laben GNSS Receiver fr Advanced Navigatin, Gedesy and Experiments) 12 chanels, dual frequency (L1 and L2) GPS/GLONASS The clck f the GOCE LAGRANAGE receiver is nt steered t integer secnds (free clck system) Interplatin f SST bservatins (Data Screening with triple differenced methd) Interplatin f GPS rbits (Zer differenced) 11

GNSS receiver n-bard GOCE (Rinex SST) Clck is nt steerd t be integer 12

Clck jumps f receiver (Nv. 2009) 13 GPS LAGRANGE receiver clck behavir!

Clck behavir f receiver (Nv. 2009) 14 20 ms Clck jumps f 20 ms at ~27 hurs can be seen

GPS visibility nbard GOCE (Nv. 2009) 15 7 < Number f GPS satellites (PRNs) < 12

GPS visibility nbard GOCE (Nv. 2009) 16 7 < Number f GPS satellites (PRNs) < 12

Zer differenced GPOD 17 Credite by ESA

Zer differenced GPOD Zer Difference Only cnnectin between LEO satellite and GPS satellites, Gemetrical Only pure gemetrical relatins between LEO and the GPS satellites have t be used, n frce mdels and n cnstraints, 18 Precise Cnsideratin all effects n GPS-SST bservatins and using precise GNSS satellites ephemerides.

Prcessing cncept Cde measurements Phase measurements Zer differencing prcedure (ZD) 19 GPOD

Precise Orbit Determinatin (POD) 1 1 1 Φ () t = ρ () t + cδt () t I () t s s s ri, r r r s1 s1 s1 s1 + T () t + λ A + e () t + ε () t r i ri, ri, ri, N trpsphere effect at GOCE altitude (~250 km) First rder inspheric effect eliminated with In-free linear cmbinatin Ambiguity term cannt be slved as Integer (real)! 20 GPS precise rbits (at 15 minutes) and clcks at 30 sec

GPS Antenna ffsets 21

GPS antenna ffsets GPS receiver ffset with respect t GOCE reference frame is cnstant L1 and L2 (L3) Phase Center Offsets (PCO) are derived frm IGS ANTEX (ANTenna Exchange frmat) Phase Center Variatin (PCV) can be empirical estimated based n carrier phase residuals! (r ANTEX?) 22 Offset with respect t center f mass (COM) is slwly varing!

Gemetrical POD hl-sst s1 s1 Φ ri, () t = s ρr () t + cδtr() t + 1 s1 Φ ri, () t = a s x () t x 1 s1 s1 s + λiari, + eri, () t + εri, () t 1 s 1 s2 s2 Φ ΦΦ ri, () ri =, () = At ρ x, a () t r () t x+ C cφ δtr() t + s s 2 2 s 2 Φ Φ Φ ( t ri, 1() ) t = ri, () ta s2 s2 s2 + = r λia a ( t1 ) () t x, x CΦ( t x ri, + eri, () 1) t + εri, () t s3 s3 Φ s3 s3 Φ ri, () ri t, () t = = ρr () t a + () c t x, C x δtr() t + Φ t s 4 s s 3 43 ΦΦ x=n Φ ( ri t, () t s3 s3 s3 + ri, () t = λi a () t 2) = A Φ, C r( tx Φ ri, + 2 ) C x eri, () x, NC t + ε Φ xˆ ri, () ( t2 ) s5 s5 ri, () t () t Φ ( T 1 N= AC a ) x s Φ A 4 s4 Φ ri, () t s= ρr () t + cδtr() t + 4 s4 Φ ri, () t = ax () t x Φ( tn) = A s4 s4 s4 + λi r( t ri, + n) x, C eri, () t + εφ( ri, () t n t) s5 s5 Φ ri, () t = ρr () t + cδtr() t + 1 x ˆ = x 0 + x, C s5 s xˆ = N 5 Φ ri, () t = s a () 5 x st x 5 s5 + λ A + e () t + ε () t 1 T 1 1 ˆ = i ri, ri, ri, () 23

Grund tracks f GPS, GOCE (2 Nv. 1 Rev.) 24

Shrt arc f GOCE (02 Nv. 2 Rev.) 25 30 minutes shrt arc (2009-11-02 02 00 00-02 30 00)

GPOD GOCE results 26 Estimated gemetrical 3D Ps. - PSO

Kinematical POD 27

Shrt arc representatin LEO rbit can be represented as: Gibbs effect! r r( τ) = r( τ) + d( τ) = r( τ) + dυ sin( υπτ) n υ= 1 Precisin! 28 J r( τ) = r( τ) + d( τ) = r( τ) + e E ( τ) + b B ( τ) 2 j 2 j 2 j+ 1 2 j+ 1 j= 1 j= 1 J J n r( τ) = r( τ) + d ( τ) + d ( τ) Slutin? P F fast cnvergence! J J n r( τ ) = r( τ ) + e E ( τ ) + b B ( τ ) + dυ sin( υπτ ) 2 j 2 j 2 j+ 1 2 j+ 1 j= 1 j= 1 υ= 1

Determinatin f Euler-Bernulli cefficients A satellite shrt arc can be represented with the Euler- Bernulli term up t degree J as: J r( τ) r( τ) = d( τ) e2 je2 j( τ) + b2 j 1B2 j 1( τ) j= 1 j= 1 J + + 29 Reference mtin ra Euler-Bernulli rb

KPOD GOCE results 30 Estimated kinematical Ps. (J=4) PSO (Furier index 30 and 40)

Cnclusins and recmmendatins GNSS-GOCE satellites cnfiguratin and gemetrical strength play an imprtant rle in POD. Estimated Gemetrical Precise Orbit can be used t estimate kinematical POD f GOCE. 31 Kinematical POD can be used t recver the Earth s gravity field mdel based n the hl-sst methds, (GOCE SST mdel). N gravity field and n frce mdels have been used in the Gemetrical and Kinematical mdes (advantage). Empirical PCV results shuld imprve POD f GOCE!

Thank yu fr yur attentin!