Space Charge Mi-ga-on

Similar documents
BEAM INSTABILITIES IN LINEAR MACHINES 1.

Space Charge in Linear Machines

BEAM INSTABILITIES IN LINEAR MACHINES 2

Accelerator physics: basic principles on beam focusing and transport

Emittance Compensation. J.B. Rosenzweig ERL Workshop, Jefferson Lab 3/20/05

Low Emittance Machines

CERN Accelerator School. Intermediate Accelerator Physics Course Chios, Greece, September Low Emittance Rings

Lecture 4: Emittance Compensation. J.B. Rosenzweig USPAS, UW-Madision 6/30/04

Low Emittance Machines

Analysis of Slice Transverse Emittance Evolution in a Photocathode RF Gun. Abstract

Low Emittance Electron Injectors

RF LINACS. Alessandra Lombardi BE/ ABP CERN

Linac JUAS lecture summary

Linac Driven Free Electron Lasers (III)

Physics 598ACC Accelerators: Theory and Applications

Simulation of transverse emittance measurements using the single slit method

Introduction to electron and photon beam physics. Zhirong Huang SLAC and Stanford University

D. Brandt, CERN. CAS Frascati 2008 Accelerators for Newcomers D. Brandt 1

ASTRA simulations of the slice longitudinal momentum spread along the beamline for PITZ

Self-consistent analysis of three dimensional uniformly charged ellipsoid with zero emittance

Longitudinal Beam Dynamics

Linear Collider Collaboration Tech Notes. Design Studies of Positron Collection for the NLC

Transverse dynamics. Transverse dynamics: degrees of freedom orthogonal to the reference trajectory

Diagnostic Systems for Characterizing Electron Sources at the Photo Injector Test Facility at DESY, Zeuthen site

ELECTRON DYNAMICS WITH SYNCHROTRON RADIATION

Transverse dynamics Selected topics. Erik Adli, University of Oslo, August 2016, v2.21

Particle Accelerators: Transverse Beam Dynamics

Beam Dynamics. D. Brandt, CERN. CAS Bruges June 2009 Beam Dynamics D. Brandt 1

Time resolved transverse and longitudinal phase space measurements at the high brightness photo injector PITZ

Tools of Particle Physics I Accelerators

USPAS Accelerator Physics 2017 University of California, Davis. Chapter 11: Space Charge Effects Space Charge, Beam-Beam

FACET-II Design Update

Beam Dynamics in Synchrotrons with Space- Charge

Accelerator Physics. Tip World Scientific NEW JERSEY LONDON SINGAPORE BEIJING SHANGHAI HONG KONG TAIPEI BANGALORE. Second Edition. S. Y.

Introduction to Accelerators. Scientific Tools for High Energy Physics and Synchrotron Radiation Research

Nonlinear Single-Particle Dynamics in High Energy Accelerators

SC forces RMS Envelope SC Child Langmuir law SCC Simulation Codes LEBT Simulation

Introduction to Collider Physics

Practical Lattice Design

Accelerator Physics Issues of ERL Prototype

Beam halo formation in high-intensity beams

Transverse Dynamics II

Fundamental Concepts of Particle Accelerators III : High-Energy Beam Dynamics (2) Koji TAKATA KEK. Accelerator Course, Sokendai. Second Term, JFY2012

Beam Dynamics with Space- Charge

Introduction. Thermoionic gun vs RF photo gun Magnetic compression vs Velocity bunching. Probe beam design options

Modeling of Space Charge Effects and Coherent Synchrotron Radiation in Bunch Compression Systems. Martin Dohlus DESY, Hamburg

Bernhard Holzer, CERN-LHC

The Accelerator Hamiltonian in a Straight Coordinate System

Compton Scattering I. 1 Introduction

Accelerator Physics NMI and Synchrotron Radiation. G. A. Krafft Old Dominion University Jefferson Lab Lecture 16

Dark Current at Injector. Jang-Hui Han 27 November 2006 XFEL Beam Dynamics Meeting

Extensions of the Longitudinal Envelope Equation

Simulations of the IR/THz source at PITZ (SASE FEL and CTR)

!"#$%$!&'()$"('*+,-')'+-$#..+/+,0)&,$%.1&&/$ LONGITUDINAL BEAM DYNAMICS

Recent developments in the Dutch Laser Wakefield Accelerators program at the University of Twente: New external bunch injection scheme.

12. Acceleration and Normalized Emittance *

Synchrotron Motion with Space-Charge

TWISS FUNCTIONS. Lecture 1 January P.J. Bryant. JUAS18_01- P.J. Bryant - Lecture 1 Twiss functions

HOMDYN STUDY FOR THE LCLS RF PHOTO-INJECTOR

Photoinjector design for the LCLS

Lund/Barnard USPAS Problem 1

Introduction to the benchmark problem

Andreas Kabel Stanford Linear Accelerator Center

4. Statistical description of particle beams

PBL SCENARIO ON ACCELERATORS: SUMMARY

FACET-II Design, Parameters and Capabilities

E. Wilson - CERN. Components of a synchrotron. Dipole Bending Magnet. Magnetic rigidity. Bending Magnet. Weak focusing - gutter. Transverse ellipse

LCLS-II SCRF start-to-end simulations and global optimization as of September Abstract

Power efficiency vs instability (or, emittance vs beam loading) Sergei Nagaitsev, Valeri Lebedev, and Alexey Burov Fermilab/UChicago Oct 18, 2017

SPACE CHARGE NEUTRALIZATION AND ITS DYNAMIC EFFECTS

A 6 GeV Compact X-ray FEL (CXFEL) Driven by an X-Band Linac

PAL LINAC UPGRADE FOR A 1-3 Å XFEL

50 MeV 1.4 GeV 25GeV 450 GeV 8 TeV. Sources of emittance growth CAS 07 Liverpool. Sept D. Möhl, slide 1

Γ f Σ z Z R

2. Passage of Radiation Through Matter

LCLS S-band Structure Coupler

Ultra-Relativistic Heavy Ion Physics (FYSH551), May 31, 2013 Jan Rak and Thorsten Renk

Problems of Chapter 1: Introduction

Envelope and Matrix Codes (TRACE 3-D & TRANSPORT Introduction)

Introduction to particle accelerators

Part III. Interaction with Single Electrons - Plane Wave Orbits

r,t r R Z j ³ 0 1 4π² 0 r,t) = 4π

Magnets and Lattices. - Accelerator building blocks - Transverse beam dynamics - coordinate system

Potential use of erhic s ERL for FELs and light sources ERL: Main-stream GeV e - Up-gradable to 20 + GeV e -

Investigation of the Feasibility of a Free Electron Laser for the Cornell Electron Storage Ring and Linear Accelerator

Heating and current drive: Radio Frequency

Small Synchrotrons. Michael Benedikt. CERN, AB-Department. CAS, Zeegse, 30/05/05 Small Synchrotrons M. Benedikt 1

Lecture Models for heavy-ion collisions (Part III): transport models. SS2016: Dynamical models for relativistic heavy-ion collisions

RF cavities (Lecture 25)

Investigation of the Effect of Space Charge in the compact-energy Recovery Linac

ELECTRON DYNAMICS with SYNCHROTRON RADIATION

06.lec Acceleration and Normalized Emittance *

Motivation of emission studies at PITZ

Novel, Hybrid RF Injector as a High-average. Dinh Nguyen. Lloyd Young

Particle physics experiments

Lecture 2: Modeling Accelerators Calculation of lattice functions and parameters. X. Huang USPAS, January 2015 Hampton, Virginia

Waves in plasma. Denis Gialis

CEPC Linac Injector. HEP Jan, Cai Meng, Guoxi Pei, Jingru Zhang, Xiaoping Li, Dou Wang, Shilun Pei, Jie Gao, Yunlong Chi

Reduction of thermal emittance of rf guns *

Experimental Measurements of the ORION Photoinjector Drive Laser Oscillator Subsystem

Transcription:

Space Charge Mi-ga-on Massimo.Ferrario@LNF.INFN.IT Hamburg June nd 016

OUTLINE The rms emicance concept rms envelope equa-on Space charge forces Space charge induced emicance oscilla-ons Matching condi-ons and emicance compensa-on

Trace space of an ideal laminar beam " x $ # x! = dx dz = p x $ % p z p x << p z X X

Trace space of a laminar beam X X

Trace space of non laminar beam X X

Geometric emittance: Ellipse equation: ε g γx + αx x $ + β x $ = ε g Twiss parameters: βγ α = 1! Ellipse area: A = πε g β = α

Trace space evolution No space charge => cross over X With space charge => no cross over X X X

rms emittance ' x ε rms + + f x,! x ( x )dx d x! =1 f! x, x! rms beam envelope: + + = x = x f ( x, x &)dxd x & Define rms emittance: ( ) = 0 γx + αx $ x + β $ x = ε rms such that: = x = βε rms ' = x! = γε rms Since: α = β $ β = x ε rms it follows: α = 1 ε rms d dz x = x x % ε rms = x' ε rms

= x = βε rms ' = x ' = γε rms x' = x x! = αε rms It holds also the relation: γβ α = 1 Substituting α,β,γ we get ' " x' $ ε rms ε rms # ε rms % ' & =1 We end up with the definition of rms emittance in terms of the second moments of the distribution: ε rms = ( x ) σ x' σ xx' = x x" x "

Which distribution has no correlations? x' = x x! = αε rms = 0? x x

What does rms emittance tell us about phase space distributions under linear or non-linear forces acting on the beam? x ε rms = x x # x x # x a a a x a x Assuming a generic x, x " correlation of the type: x! = Cx n When n = 1 ==> ε rms = 0 ε rms = C ( x x n x n+1 ) When n = 1 ==> ε rms = 0

Constant under linear transformation only And without acceleration: " x = p x p z

Normalized rms emittance: ε n,rms Canonical transverse momentum: p x = p z x! = m o cβγ x! p z p ε n,rms = 1 m o c σ xσ px σ xpx = 1 m o c ( x p x xp ) βγ ε x rms Liouville theorem: the density of particles n, or the volume V occupied by a given number of particles in phase space (x,p x,y,p y,z,p z ) remains invariant under conservative forces. It hold also in the projected phase spaces (x,p x ),(y,p y )(,z,p z ) provided that there are no couplings

Limits of single particle emittance Limits are set by Quantum Mechanics on the knowledge of the two conjugate variables (x,p x ). According to Heisenberg: σ px! This limitation can be expressed by saying that the state of a particle is not exactly represented by a point, but by a small uncertainty volume of the order of! 3 in the 6D phase space. In D it holds: ε n,rms = 1 m o c σ xσ px σ xpx = $ 0 classical limit & % 1! m o c = " c & =1.9 10 13 m quantum limit '

OUTLINE The rms emicance concept rms envelope equa-on Space charge forces Space charge induced emicance oscilla-ons Matching condi-ons and emicance compensa-on

Envelope Equation without Acceleration Now take the derivatives: d dz = d dz d dz = d dz x = 1 x! = 1 d x! dz d dz x = 1 x x! = x! σ x x! σ = 1 x! + x x! 3 x x ( )! 3 = σ! x + x x!! x! 3 And simplify: σ!! x = σ xσ x' x' + x x!! 3 = ε rms σ + x x!! 3 x We obtain the rms envelope equation in which the rms emittance enters as defocusing pressure like term. σ!! x x x!! = ε rms 3

σ!! x x x!! = ε rms 3 Assuming that each particle is subject only to a linear focusing force, without acceleration: x!! + k x x = 0 take the average over the entire particle ensemble " + k x = ε rms 3 x x!! = k x x We obtain the rms envelope equation with a linear focusing force in which the rms emittance enters as defocusing pressure like term. ε rms σ T 3 x V P

Beam Thermodynamics Kinetic theory of gases defines temperatures in each directions and global as: k B T x = m v x T = 1 ( 3 T x +T y +T z ) E k = 1 m v = 3 k BT Definition of beam temperature in analogy: k B T beam,x = m o v x v x = ( βγc) x! = ( βγc) ( γ x ε x,rms ) We get: k B T beam,x = m o c ( βγ) ( γ x ε x,rms )

k B T beam,x = m o c ( βγ) ( γ x ε x,rms ) S = kn log πε ( )

OUTLINE The rms emicance concept rms envelope equa-on Space charge forces Space charge induced emicance oscilla-ons Matching condi-ons and emicance compensa-on

Space Charge: what does it mean? The net effect of the Coulomb interactions in a multi-particle system can be classified into two regimes: 1) Collisional Regime ==> dominated by binary collisions caused by close particle encounters ==> Single Particle Effects ) Space Charge Regime ==> dominated by the self field produced by the particle distribution, which varies appreciably only over large distances compare to the average separation of the particles ==> Collective Effects

Continuous Uniform Cylindrical Beam Model ρ = I π R v R J = I π R Gauss s law ε o E ds = Ampere s law ρdv E r = E r = I πε o R v r for r R I πε o v 1 r for r > R Ir B dl = µ o J ds B ϑ = µ o πr for r R I B ϑ = µ o for r > R πr B ϑ = β c E r

Bunched Uniform Cylindrical Beam Model L(t) R(t) (0,0) s l v z = βc Longitudinal Space Charge field in the bunch moving frame: ρ = Q πr L E z s,r = 0 ( ) = ρ 4πε o R π L ( l s ) rdrdϕd l & ( l s ) + r 3 / ) 0 0 0 '( * + E z ( s,r = 0) = ρ % ε 0 &' ( ) R + ( L s ) R + s + s L ( )*

Radial Space Charge field in the bunch moving frame by series representation of axisymmetric field: $ E r (r, s) ρ & % ε 0 s ' E z (0, s) ) r ( + [ ] r3 16 + E r (r, s ) = ρ ε 0 % ' & ' ( L s ) R + ( L + s ) s R + s ( * ) * r

Lorentz Transformation to the Lab frame E z = E z E r = γ E r L = γl ρ = ρ γ s = γs E z (0,s) = ρ & R + γ (L s) R + γ s + γ s L γ ε 0 '( ( ) ) * + E r (r,s) = γρ & ( (L s) ε + 0 ' ( R + γ (L s) s R + γ s ) + * + r It is still a linear field with r but with a longitudinal correlation s

Bunched Uniform Cylindrical Beam Model E z (0,s,γ ) = I πγε 0 R βc h s,γ ( ) E r (r,s,γ ) = Ir πε 0 R βc g s,γ ( ) γ= 1 γ = 5 γ = 10 R s (t) L(t) Δt

Lorentz Force F r = e( E r βcb ) ϑ = e( 1 β )E r = ee r γ is a linear function of the transverse coordinate dp r dt = F r = ee r γ = eir πγ ε 0 R βc g s,γ ( ) The attractive magnetic force, which becomes significant at high velocities, tends to compensate for the repulsive electric force. Therefore space charge defocusing is primarily a non-relativistic effect. F x = eix πγ ε 0 βc g s,γ ( )

Envelope Equation with Space Charge Single particle transverse motion: dp x dt d dt x!! = = F x p x = p x! = βγm o c x! ( p x! ) = βc d dz p x! F x βcp ( ) = F x F x = eix πγ ε 0 βc g s,γ ( ) x!! = k sc s,γ ( ) x k sc = I I A g s,γ ( ) I A = 4πε o m o c3 e

Now we can calculate the term x x " that enters in the envelope equation σ!! x = ε rms σ + x x!! 3 x!! x = k sc x x x!! = k sc x =k sc Including all the other terms the envelope equation reads: Space Charge De-focusing Force σ!! x + k = ε n ( βγ) σ + k sc 3 x Emittance Pressure External Focusing Forces Laminarity Parameter: ( ρ = βγ ) k sc ε n

The beam undergoes two regimes along the accelerator " + k = ε n ( βγ) σ + k sc 3 x ρ>>1 Laminar Beam " + k = ε n ( βγ) σ + k sc 3 x ρ<<1 Thermal Beam

OUTLINE The rms emicance concept rms envelope equa-on Space charge forces Space charge induced emicance oscilla-ons Matching condi-ons and emicance compensa-on

Surface charge density Surface electric field Restoring force Plasma frequency Plasma oscillations

Neutral Plasma Oscillations Instabilities EM Wave propagation Single Component Cold Relativistic Plasma Magnetic focusing Magnetic focusing

( ) σ " + k s σ = k sc s,γ σ Equilibrium solution: ( ) = k sc( s,γ ) σ eq s,γ k s Single Component Relativistic Plasma k s = qb mcβγ Small perturbation: σ( ζ ) = σ eq ( s) +δσ ( s) δ σ # s ( ) + k s δσ ( s) = 0 δσ ( s) = δσ o ( s)cos( k s z) Perturbed trajectories oscillate around the equilibrium with the same frequency but with different amplitudes: σ( s) = σ eq ( s) +δσ o ( s)cos( k s z)

σ eq ( s) Perturbed trajectories oscillate around the equilibrium with the same frequency but with different amplitudes: σ ( s) = σ eq ( s) +δσ o ( s)cos( k s z)

Envelope oscillations drive Emittance oscillations σ(z) ε(z) ε rms = ( x ) sin k sz σ x σ x' σ xx' = x x % x % ( )

Energy spread induces decoherence σ(z) ε(z)

Emittance Oscillations are driven by space charge differential defocusing in core and tails of the beam p x Projected Phase Space x Slice Phase Spaces

Perturbed trajectories oscillate around the equilibrium with the same frequency but with different amplitudes X X

OUTLINE The rms emicance concept rms envelope equa-on Space charge forces Space charge induced emicance oscilla-ons Matching condi-ons and emicance compensa-on

High Brightness Photo-Injector

Envelope Equation with Longitudinal Acceleration dp x dt x!! +! = d ( p x! ) = βc d ( dt dz p x! ) = 0 p p x! = 0 x!! = βγ βγ ( )! x! p = βγm o c σ!! x = ε rms σ + x x!! 3 x x x!! ( = βγ )! βγ x x! ( = βγ )! ( )! βγ x' = βγ βγ σ! x Space Charge De-focusing Force Adiabatic Damping ( )! σ!! x + βγ βγ σ! x + k = ε n ( βγ) σ + k sc 3 x Emittance Pressure Other External Focusing Forces ε n = βγε rms

Beam subject to strong acceleration σ!! x + γ! σ! x + k RF γ γ σ = ε n x γ σ + k o sc 3 x γ 3 We must include also the RF focusing force: k RF =! γ k o sc = I g( s,γ ) I A

" + γ " σ " x + k RF γ γ = ε n γ 3 σ + x k o sc γ 3 γ = 1 +αz ==> γ " = 0 Looking for an equilibrium solution σ inv = σ o γ n ==> all terms must have the same dependence on γ σ " inv = nσ o γ n 1 γ " σ inv " = n( n 1)σ o γ n " γ n( n 1)σ o γ n γ % + nσ o γ n γ % + k RF σ o γ n = k o sc γ 3 n n = 3 n n = 1

γ = 1 +αz ==> γ " = 0 " + γ " σ " x + k RF γ γ = ε n γ 3 σ + x γ 3 Looking for an equilibrium solution σ inv = σ o γ n ==> all terms must have the same dependence on γ k o sc Laminar beam Thermal beam ρ >> 1 n = 1 ρ << 1 n = 0 σ q = σ o γ σ ε = σ o

Space charge dominated beam (Laminar) σ q = 1 γ # I I A γ Emittance dominated beam (Thermal) σ ε = ε n γ $

σ q = 1 γ # I I A γ This solution represents a beam equilibrium mode that turns out to be the transport mode for achieving minimum emittance at the end of the emittance correction process

An important property of the laminar beam σ q = 1 γ # I I A γ σ q ' = I I A γ 3 Constant phase space angle: δ = γσ ' q σ q = γ & p x p x δ X δ X

Laminarity parameter ρ = Iσ γi A ε Iσ q n γi A ε = 4I n γ ' I A ε n γ Transition Energy (ρ=1) γ tr = I # γ I A ε n ρ I=4 ka ε th = 0.6 µm E acc = 5 MV/m I=1 ka Potential space charge emittance growth I=100 A ρ = 1

Matching Conditions with a TW Linac γ tr = I # γ I A ε n 150 MeV σ ' = 0 σ q = 1 # γ I I A γ 5 MV/m

z=0.3891 0.05 z=1.5 z=10 0.04 0.04 0.0 0.0 Pr 0 Pr 0 pr_[rad] 0-0.0-0.0-0.04 3.5-0.05 0 0.001 0.00 0.003 0.004 0.005 0.006 0 0.0008 0.0016 0.004 0.003 0.004 R [m] R [m] -0.04 0 0.0008 0.0016 0.004 0.003 0.004 R_[m] 3.5 rms norm. emittance [um] rms beam size [mm] 1.5 1 0.5 0 0.004 0.0035 0.003 Gun Linac 0 4 6 8 10 z=0.3891 z=1.5 Z=10 0.004 0.004 0.0035 Z_[m] 0.0035 0.003 0.003 Rs [m] 0.005 0.00 0.0015 0.001 Rs [m] 0.005 0.00 0.0015 0.001 Rs [m] 0.005 0.00 0.0015 0.001 0.0005 0.0005 0 0-0.003-0.00-0.001 0 0.001 0.00 0.003-0.003-0.00-0.001 0 0.001 0.00 0.003 Zs-Zb [m] Zs-Zb [m] 0.0005 0-0.003-0.00-0.001 0 0.001 0.00 0.003 Zs-Zb [m]

Energy spread induces decoherence σ(z) ε(z)

Emittance Compensation for a SC dominated beam: Controlled Damping of Plasma Oscillations ε n oscillations are driven by Space Charge propagation close to the laminar solution allows control of ε n oscillation phase ε n sensitive to SC up to the transition energy

References: