Laser de-spin maneuver for an active debris removal mission - a realistic scenario for Envisat

Similar documents
SLR-based orbit determination and orbit prediction of space debris objects

Graz in Space Graz SLR System. Daniel Kucharski. IWF / SatGeo

SLR Graz: khz Satellite Laser Ranging & Co

Results and Analyses of Debris Tracking from Mt Stromlo

INTERNATIONAL SLR SERVICE

Copyright 2016 Advanced Maui Optical and Space Surveillance Technologies Conference (AMOS)

Satellite and debris characterisation in LEO and GEO using adaptive optics

A method to calculate zero-signature satellite laser ranging normal points for millimeter geodesy - a case study with Ajisai

Development of Laser Measurement to Space Debris at Shanghai SLR Station

Automating the assessment of orbit predictions and estimations for building and maintaining a new catalogue

Adaptive Optics for Satellite and Debris Imaging in LEO and GEO

ORBIT DETERMINATION ANALYSIS FOR A JOINT UK-AUSTRALIAN SPACE SURVEILLANCE EXPERIMENT

Comparison of ENVISAT s attitude simulation and real optical and SLR observations in order to refine the satellite attitude model

ATTITUDE CONTROL MECHANIZATION TO DE-ORBIT SATELLITES USING SOLAR SAILS

End of Life Re-orbiting The Meteosat-5 Experience

2 INTRODUCTION 3 ORBIT DETERMINATION

SUMMARY REPORT. Characterization of objects in near-earth space using Metsähovi satellite laser ranging system

Status of the Gravitational Redshift Test with Eccentric Galileo Satellites

A TLE-BASED REPRESENTATION OF PRECISE ORBIT PREDICTION RESULTS. Jizhang Sang and Bin Li. School of Geodesy and Geomatics, Wuhan University

THE ROLE OF IMPACTS AND MOMENTUM TRANSFER FOR THE EVOLUTION OF ENVISAT S ATTITUDE STATE

Defunct Satellites, Rotation Rates and the YORP Effect. Antonella A. Albuja and Daniel J. Scheeres University of Colorado - Boulder, Boulder, CO, USA

Application of Accelerometer Data in Precise Orbit Determination of GRACE -A and -B

ACCURATE ORBIT DETERMINATION OF SPACE DEBRIS WITH LASER TRACKING

What Happened to BLITS? An Analysis of the 2013 Jan 22 Event

1. (a) Describe the difference between over-expanded, under-expanded and ideallyexpanded

Prediction accuracy analysis from orbital elements generated for a new space object catalogue

Solar radiation pressure model for the relay satellite of SELENE

The Orbit Control of ERS-1 and ERS-2 for a Very Accurate Tandem Configuration

High-Altitude airborne platform characterisation of adaptive optic corrected ground based laser

Venus Express Aerobraking and End of Mission

Tools of Astronomy Tools of Astronomy

Detumbling and Capturing Strategies with Eddy Current Brake System on Orbital Space Robot

INTER-AGENCY SPACE DEBRIS COORDINATION COMMITTEE (IADC) SPACE DEBRIS ISSUES IN THE GEOSTATIONARY ORBIT AND THE GEOSTATIONARY TRANSFER ORBITS

Satellite Components & Systems. Dr. Ugur GUVEN Aerospace Engineer (P.hD) Nuclear Science & Technology Engineer (M.Sc)

Orbital Debris Observation via Laser Illuminated Optical Measurement Techniques

Study Participants: T.E. Sarris, E.R. Talaat, A. Papayannis, P. Dietrich, M. Daly, X. Chu, J. Penson, A. Vouldis, V. Antakis, G.

Orbit Design Marcelo Suárez. 6th Science Meeting; Seattle, WA, USA July 2010

Experimental Analysis of Low Earth Orbit Satellites due to Atmospheric Perturbations

Debris orbit prediction accuracy from orbit determinations using very short-arc optical and laser tracking data *

Satellite imaging with adaptive optics on a 1 m telescope

EVALUATING ORBITS WITH POTENTIAL TO USE SOLAR SAIL FOR STATION-KEEPING MANEUVERS

EXTENSIVE LIGHT CURVE DATABASE OF ASTRONOMICAL INSTITUTE OF THE UNIVERSITY OF BERN

ACCURACY ASSESSMENT OF GEOSTATIONARY-EARTH-ORBIT WITH SIMPLIFIED PERTURBATIONS MODELS

Towards an improved ILRS TRF contribution

USA Space Debris Environment, Operations, and Policy Updates

CONCEPTUAL DESIGN FOR EXPERT COORDINATION CENTRES SUPPORTING OPTICAL AND SLR OBSERVATIONS IN A SST SYSTEM

Ludwig Combrinck HartRAO 3rd Space Geodesy Workshop 16 March 2009 Matjiesfontein

PROBA 1. F. Teston ESA/ESTEC D/TEC-EL

SCIAMACHY REFLECTANCE AND POLARISATION VALIDATION: SCIAMACHY VERSUS POLDER

Optimization of Orbital Transfer of Electrodynamic Tether Satellite by Nonlinear Programming

Swiss Contributions to a Better Understanding of the Space Debris Environment

Improving LEO prediction precision with TLEs

3.4.2 International Laser Ranging Service (ILRS)

Orbit and Transmit Characteristics of the CloudSat Cloud Profiling Radar (CPR) JPL Document No. D-29695

THE NEWEST HUNGARIAN COSMIC RADIATION MEASUREMENT RESULTS IN THE STRATOSPHERE USING STRATOSPHERIC BALLOONS AND SOUNDING ROCKETS

System and Concurrent Engineering for the e.deorbit Mission Assessment Studies Robin Biesbroek Jakob Hüsing Andrew Wolahan

Pointing Control for Low Altitude Triple Cubesat Space Darts

Passive Orbital Debris Removal Using Special Density Materials

COE CST Fifth Annual Technical Meeting. Task 187: Space Situational Awareness. PI: Dan Scheeres Student: In-Kwan Park University of Colorado

ORBIT DETERMINATION THROUGH GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEMS: A LITERATURE SURVEY

Physics Higher level Paper 1

The ACES Mission. Fundamental Physics Tests with Cold Atom Clocks in Space. L. Cacciapuoti European Space Agency

Orbital Debris Challenges for Space Operations J.-C. Liou, PhD NASA Chief Scientist for Orbital Debris

SPACE DEBRIS CHASER CONSTELLATION

EVALUATION OF A SPACECRAFT TRAJECTORY DEVIATION DUE TO THE LUNAR ALBEDO

FORMATION FLYING WITH SHEPHERD SATELLITES NIAC Fellows Meeting Michael LaPointe Ohio Aerospace Institute

The Quantum Sensor Challenge Designing a System for a Space Mission. Astrid Heske European Space Agency The Netherlands

Orbits for Polar Applications Malcolm Macdonald

Sail-Assisted End-of-Life Disposal of High-LEO Satellites

EVOLUTION OF SPACECRAFT ORBITAL MOTION DUE TO HYPERVELOCITY IMPACTS WITH DEBRIS AND METEOROIDS

Improvement of the CNES/CLS IDS Analysis Center solution for the contribution to the next ITRF

PRELIMINARY HARDWARE DESIGN OF ATTITUDE CONTROL SUBSYSTEM OF LEONIDAS SPACECRAFT

Questions from April 2003 Physics Final Exam

AS3010: Introduction to Space Technology

International Space Station (ISS) Nears A Six-Figure Orbit Count

Systems Engineering in Venus Satellite

CHAPTER 3 PERFORMANCE

Space Surveillance with Star Trackers. Part II: Orbit Estimation

Current Status of Non-conservative Force Modelling:

EFFECTS OF DIRECT AND INDIRECT SOLAR RADIATION PRESSURE IN ORBITAL PARAMETERS OF GPS SATELITTES

DETERMINATION OF THE STATION COORDINATES FOR QUALITY CONTROL OF THE SATELLITE LASER RANGING DATA S.

Co-location of VLBI with other techniques in space: a simulation study

Design optimization of a Solar Panel Angle and its Application to CubeSat 'CADRE'

BravoSat: Optimizing the Delta-V Capability of a CubeSat Mission. with Novel Plasma Propulsion Technology ISSC 2013

Exercise 1: Earth s Moon

Gravitational Waves & Intermediate Mass Black Holes. Lee Samuel Finn Center for Gravitational Wave Physics

A Mission to Planet Mars Gravity Field Determination

Results from the NOAA-14 Microwave Sounding Unit Pitch Test

Overview of the Current Baseline of the Solar-C Spacecraft System

CHAPTER 3 PERFORMANCE

Vital Statistics. The Moon. The Tides The gravitational pull between the Earth, the Moon and the Sun causes three inter-related effects: Lunar Phases

INTERNAL THALES ALENIA SPACE

Remote Sensing I: Basics

Attitude Determination and. Attitude Control

Optimal Gravity Assisted Orbit Insertion for Europa Orbiter Mission

THERMAL CONTROL DESIGN FOR A MICROSATELLITE. Kaipo Kent Department of Electrical Engineering University of Hawai i at Mānoa Honolulu, HI 96822

HYPER Industrial Feasibility Study Final Presentation Orbit Selection

MAE 180A: Spacecraft Guidance I, Summer 2009 Homework 2 Due Tuesday, July 14, in class.

AST111, Lecture 1b. Measurements of bodies in the solar system (overview continued) Orbital elements

AIM RS: Radio Science Investigation with AIM

Transcription:

Laser de-spin maneuver for an active debris removal mission - a realistic scenario for Envisat Daniel Kucharski Space Environment Research Centre, Mt Stromlo Observatory, Weston Creek ACT, 2611, AUSTRALIA James C. Bennett Space Environment Research Centre, Mt Stromlo Observatory, Weston Creek ACT, 2611, AUSTRALIA Georg Kirchner Space Research Institute, Graz SLR Observatory, Austrian Academy of Sciences, Lustbühelstrasse 46, 8042 Graz, AUSTRIA ABSTRACT The defunct satellite Envisat is considered to be a potential target for a future de-orbit mission (ESA s e.deorbit). Before the removal from orbit, the massive satellite has to lose its rotational energy to present a stable attitude in the space. The laser tracking and optical observations reveal that the satellite s spin energy decays according to an exponential trend and will dissipate by 2032. This loss of the spin energy is caused by the interaction between the metallic spacecraft and the Earth s magnetic field and the de-spin process can be accelerated if an additional laser photon pressure is applied on the spacecraft s body. The simulations performed with the macromodel of Envisat indicate that a global network of ten high power laser systems (20 kw each) has the potential to exert a significant laser photon pressure force and de-spin the spacecraft 11 years earlier than it would occur naturally. 1. INTRODUCTION The environmental satellites Envisat and Topex (Table 1) were nadir stabilized during the active time of the mission. After the end of life the satellites became passive space debris objects and lost their attitude stabilization. The lack of the active maneuvers resulted in the slow orbit decay which can be observed as a decrease of the orbital period (Fig. 1). Table 1. Mission parameters of Envisat and Topex Satellite NORAD Sponsor Mission start Mission end Inclination Eccentricity Altitude Mass Envisat 27386 ESA March April 2002 2012 98.5 0.001 796 km 8200 kg Topex 22076 NASA and CNES August 1992 October 2005 66 0.000 1340 km 2400 kg

Fig 1. Envisat and Topex orbit decay after the end of the mission. Image credit: ESA, NASA The large, passive satellites interact with the space environment and change their attitude mostly under the influence of the Earth s gravity and magnetic fields and solar radiation pressure. Envisat and Topex reveal a very interesting spin dynamics which can be measured by the laser ranging and optical systems. In order to determine the spin rates of the satellites we use the laser range observations collected by the SLR systems from Graz (major participant) and other participants organized within the Space Debris Study Group of International Laser Ranging Service [3]. 2. SPIN ANALYSIS Envisat and Topex are equipped with the retro-reflector arrays for the satellite laser ranging (SLR) observations. The SLR data can be also used to determine the inertial orientation and the spin rates of such objects. The laser observations delivered by the global ILRS stations indicate an opposite spin behavior of the analyzed satellites: the spin period of Envisat is increasing over time (Fig. 2), while the spin period of Topex is decreasing (Fig. 3). Fig 2. Spin period of Envisat determined from SLR data. RMS of the spin period residuals calculated to the trend function is 5.6 s.

Fig 3. Spin period of Topex determined from the SLR data. RMS of the spin period residuals calculated to the trend function is 21 ms. The decrease in the spin period observed in the case of Topex is caused by the solar radiation pressure. The force exerted by sunlight on the large solar panel causes the spacecraft to gain the rotational energy over time the spin period decreases at the rate of 44.3 ms/year. The physical simulations performed with the macromodel of Topex indicate that the modulation of the spin period trend is the result of the change of incident angle between the normal vector to the solar panel surface and the direction to the Sun. The torque produced on the satellite by the solar radiation pressure varies over time, but remains below 1 mnm Fig. 4. Fig 4. Solar photon pressure torque on Topex. Values averaged over 3 orbital periods. The observed increase of the spin period of Envisat is caused by the strong interaction between the spacecraft and the external magnetic field. The flow of the eddy currents in the metallic elements of the body dissipates the rotational energy according to an exponential trend. Fig. 5 presents the modeled magnetic torque on Envisat during year 2015. The torque has a magnitude of a few tens of nnm and always acts against the spin of the satellite the flowing eddy currents convert the spin energy into heat. Due to the sun-synchronous orbit of Envisat the solar radiation pressure torque averages out and does not cause any long term perturbations of the spin rate.

Fig 5. Magnetic torque on Envisat. Values averaged over one orbital period. 3. LASER FORCE FOR DE-SPIN MANEUVER Defunct Envisat occupies a crowded polar orbit and it is a potential candidate for the active debris removal mission e.deorbit (ESA s Clean Space program). The risk of the debris removal maneuver can be minimized if the spin energy of Envisat is dissipated before a close contact with the robotic spacecraft. We propose the use of the high power laser systems to produce a negative torque on the spacecraft and stabilize its attitude for the active removal mission. The proposed idea is investigated with the simulated network of 10 globally distributed high power laser systems (wavelength 532 nm) - Fig. 6 which can observe Envisat whenever it is above 10 degrees of elevation. Fig 6. Simulated global distribution of the high power laser systems. An orbital track of Envisat is marked: red line satellite in Sun, blue line in shadow. The field of view (at Envisat altitude) of the polar systems is indicated by the red lines. The orientation of Envisat spin axis is stable in the orbital coordinate system and makes 62 angle with the nadir vector [1]. This information along with the actual (observed) spin period and the spin phase of the body allows prediction of the epoch times when the laser force applied from a defined ground position can produce a negative torque on the spinning satellite. In order to compute the laser force vector on Envisat we use the standard photon pressure model [2] successfully used to explain the observed spin behavior of Topex (Fig. 3). In the simulations it is assumed that the laser fire times are synchronized with the Envisat spin model in such a way that the torque produced by the laser force acts always against the spin motion.

The observed exponential spin period trend indicates that the satellite will lose the spin energy in April 2032 (spin period equals to orbital period). The spin simulations show that the high power laser network can increase the rate at which the satellite loses the rotational energy: the use of 20 kw lasers can de-spin Envisat by August 2021, while 50 kw by April 2018 (Fig. 7-A). Fig. 7-B presents the torque (along spin axis component - responsible for the spin rate change) produced by the solar and laser radiation pressure on Envisat: the generation of the laser force is synchronized with the satellite spin model and is applied only when the produced torque acts against the satellite spin. Fig 7. A) The spin period of Envisat: blue the observed exponential trend; green, orange, red the simulated trends with the use of the laser force. B) The computed solar and laser photon pressure torque (along spin axis component) the laser torque remains negative and acts against the satellite spin. 4. CONCLUSIONS The solar radiation pressure can significantly affect the dynamics of the space debris objects. The spin period of defunct Topex is not stable and changes over time with the rates dependent on the solar photon pressure received by the spacecraft. The spin period of Envisat increases over time due to the magnetic interaction between the satellite and the external field and will become equal to the orbital period in April 2032. The additional photon pressure generated by the ground laser systems can be used to exert a negative torque on Envisat and increase the de-spin rate of the body. The use of the tracking network consisting of ten 20 kw laser systems has the capability to de-spin Envisat by August 2021 and stabilize it for the active debris removal mission.

5. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT We acknowledge the use of data provided by Graz SLR station obtained within the ESA project Debris Attitude Motion Measurements and Modelling (Project No. 40000112447), as well as the other SLR systems organized within the International Laser Ranging Service ILRS. The authors would also like to acknowledge the support of the Cooperative Research Centre for Space Environment Management (SERC Limited) through the Australian Government s Cooperative Research Centre Programme. 6. REFERENCES 1. Kucharski, D., Kirchner, G., Koidl, F., et al., Attitude and spin period of space debris Envisat measured by Satellite Laser Ranging, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., vol. 52 (12), pp. 7651-7657, doi:10.1109/tgrs.2014.2316138, 2014. 2. Milani, A., Nobili, A.M., Farinella, P., Non-Gravitational Perturbations and Satellite Geodesy, Bristol Hilger, ISBN 0-85274-538-9, 1987. 3. Pearlman, M.R., Degnan, J.J., Bosworth, J.M., The International Laser Ranging Service, Adv. Space Res. 30 (2), 135 143, doi:10.1016/s0273-1177(02)00277-6, 2002.