Phase 1 Geoscientific Preliminary Assessment Southern Ontario, Sedimentary Communities

Similar documents
Initial Borehole Drilling and Testing in Central Huron,

Initial Borehole Drilling and Testing in or Near Ignace

Initial Borehole Drilling in the Hornepayne and Manitouwadge Area

Phase 1 Geoscientific Desktop Preliminary Assessment of Potential Suitability for Siting a Deep Geological Repository for Canada s Used Nuclear Fuel

The volunteer process of site selection for radwaste disposal in Canada:

Ontario Ministry of Northern Development and Mines Submission to the Joint Review Panel Public Hearing Proposed Bruce Deep Geological Repository

Geoscientific Research and Links to the Regulatory Framework for the Development of the Safety Case

CNSC Review of the Long-Term Safety Case for a Deep Geologic Repository

IAEA SAFETY STANDARDS Geotechnical Aspects of Site Evaluation and Foundations in NPPs, NS-G-3.6

Underground nuclear waste storage

Urbanization and Sustainable Development of Cities: A Ready Engine to Promote Economic Growth and Cooperation

Dept. of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Waterloo, 200 University Ave W, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada, N2L 3G1 2

WHAT IS MINERAL EXPLORATION?

Deep Borehole Disposal Performance Assessment and Criteria for Site Selection

BCGQ Mission Statement. Acquire new geoscientific knowledge in Québec within a sustainable development perspective of our mineral resources.

Potential for Shale Gas in Georgia:

Introduction and Project Overview

Answers to questions raised by Gerhard Schmidt concerning the planning process for a Danish nuclear waste repository

CONFERENCE STATEMENT

NATURAL RESOURCES CANADA

Role of SF-MST. A summary of SF-MST

patersongroup Mineral Aggregate Assessment 3119 Carp Road Ottawa, Ontario Prepared For Mr. Greg LeBlanc March 7, 2014 Report: PH2223-REP.

Hydrogeological Assessment for Part of Lots 2 and 3, Concession 5, Township of Thurlow, County of Hastings 1.0 INTRODUCTION. 1.

APPLICATION OF 1D HYDROMECHANICAL COUPLING IN TOUGH2 TO A DEEP GEOLOGICAL REPOSITORY GLACIATION SCENARIO

Technical Requirements of Geothermal Exploration in the RSM DADI THORBJORNSON, RSM CONSULTANT WORKSHOP SWISS HOTEL IZMIR 5 JULY 2018

Geological Survey of Canada Lands and Minerals Sector Natural Resources Canada OneGeology, June 2018

Rio Tinto Serbia Highlights Innovating to Develop New Resources

Measuring Disaster Risk for Urban areas in Asia-Pacific

Finding Large Capacity Groundwater Supplies for Irrigation

about GCC

Geological information for Europe : Towards a pan-european Geological Data Infrastructure

Phase 2 Geoscientific Preliminary Assessment, Findings from Initial Field Studies

The National Spatial Strategy

Advancing Geoscientific Capability. Geological Survey of Finland

Geological control in 3D stratigraphic modeling, Oak Ridges Moraine, southern Ontario. Logan, C., Russell, H. A. J., and Sharpe, D. R.

AN OVERVIEW OF RESPONSES TO THE AMIGO QUESTIONNAIRE ON THE USE OF GEOSCIENCE DATA IN SAFETY CASES. M. Jensen 1, B Goodwin 2

National Instrument Technical Report

Evaluating Suitability of Appalachian Basin Reservoirs for NGLs Storage Jessica Moore, West Virginia Geological & Economic Survey

What is Spatial Planning?

Geoscientific Verification Plan

a national geological survey perspective François ROBIDA BRGM (French Geological Survey)

OIL AND GAS PLAYS OF THE MICHIGAN BASIN, SOUTHERN ONTARIO. Terry Carter, Consulting Geologist London, Ontario

Comprehensive Community Planning

Vermont Geological Survey s Impact on Public Issues: Geologic Mapping Applied to Hazards and Water

What is the scope for carbon capture and storage in Northern Ireland. Michelle Bentham

Exploring Eastern Africa. East Africa Oil and Gas Summit, 2014 March 2014

The first steps in the hydropower project cycle:

City of Manitou Springs

Biodiversity and Protected Areas Management Project

The Niagara Escarpment extends from western New York, through the GTA all the way up to Manitoulin Island and into Michigan and Wisconsin.

Harvey Thorleifson, Director, Minnesota Geological Survey. Status of geological mapping needed for groundwater protection in Minnesota

MANN SILVER-COBALT MINE. PORE: TSXV PowerOre.com

CONFERENCE STATEMENT

- CHU PROJECT - MOLYBDENUM IN THE NECHAKO PLATEAU

CO 2 Atlas Assessment of Geological Storage Potential

Metallic Mineral Exploration in Minnesota: Typical Exploration Activities. Division of Lands and Minerals Minnesota Department of Natural Resources

TECHNICAL SUPPORT DOCUMENT # 1 COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF ALTERNATIVE SITES APPENDIX TSD#1-H. Design & Operations Component

1. Introduction NORTHWATCH 1

11/22/2010. Groundwater in Unconsolidated Deposits. Alluvial (fluvial) deposits. - consist of gravel, sand, silt and clay

Evaluation of the hydraulic gradient at an island for low-level nuclear waste disposal

Buried-valley Aquifers: Delineation and Characterization from Reflection Seismic and Core Data at Caledon East, Ontario

Geodata flow TUKES GTK mineral exploration data - future prospecting capital!

Terms of Reference for the Comparative Environmental Review (CER) of. Options for the Mactaquac Project, Mactaquac, New Brunswick

Postclosure Safety Assessment: Groundwater Modelling

Regional groundwater mapping and model

Current Status of Program for Geological Disposal of high-level radioactive waste (HLW) in Japan 1

CITY OF CAMBRIDGE Growth & Intensification Study Secondary Plan Stakeholder Session June 26th, 2017

Cuyama Basin North Fork Vineyard

CREDENTIALS. HERBERT E. JOHNSTON 185 Manville Hill Rd, Unit 203 Cumberland, Rhode Island (401)

Access to MRM deposits in European countries and associated territories. Case Study: Aggregates plans and their future:

DEPARTMENT OF GEOLOGY AND MINERAL INDUSTRIES WAYS & MEANS SUBCOMMITTEE ON NATURAL RESOURCES MARCH 2, 2017

EUSAIR on sea topics from Slovenian perspective

ENVISIONING OUR CITY: 2041 PUBLIC INFORMATION CENTRE #2 November 16, 2017

GEOTHERMAL ENERGY EXPLORATION IN UGANDA, COUNTRY UPDATE 2006

For Official Use NEA/RWM/CLAYCLUB/A(2010)1. Integration Group for the Safety Case (IGSC) 13-Jul-2010

Legal problems of environmental management. Spatial planning and space management. M. Gajewski 2014 / 2015

An introduction to thee Urban Oases Site Selection Tool:

The Need for Regional Geological Datasets

Realizing benefits of Spatial Data Infrastructure A user s perspective from Environment Agency - Abu Dhabi

REGIS RESOURCES LTD. McPhillamys Update Presentation May 2018

Aquifer Mapping and Characterization in southern Ontario:

UN-GGIM: Strengthening Geospatial Capability

NEW PRODUCTS AND ADVANCEMENTS IN 3-D MODELLING PROTOCOLS BASED ON STUDIES IN THICK DRIFT AREAS IN ONTARIO, CANADA

November 29, World Urban Forum 6. Prosperity of Cities: Balancing Ecology, Economy and Equity. Concept Note

Measurement of the Urban-Housing Deficit:

CHAPTER 4 HIGH LEVEL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK (SDF) Page 95

Karst Assessment. March Prepared by: S.R.H. Worthington NWMO DGR-TR

Geologic Management. Contents

CHINESE GEOTOURISM AND GEOPARKS: SELECTED CASES

PROMOTING NATURE CONSERVATION AND SUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT IN THE RURAL AREAS OF HONG KONG

REGIONAL GROUNDWATER MAPPING AN ASSESSMENT TOOL FOR INCORPORATING GROUNDWATER INTO THE PLANNING PROCESS

Together towards a Sustainable Urban Agenda

Tourism. April State Planning Policy state interest guideline. Department of Infrastructure, Local Government and Planning

Oriented Core Logging of DGR-5 and DGR-6. Steve Gaines, Kenneth Raven and Michael Melaney

Delta Flood Protection Strategy Update. May 16, 2016

Development of the Portal of Cultural Heritage Objects the Kingdom of Poland

Prospectors Making NEW Discoveries

WITPRESS WIT Press publishes leading books in Science and Technology. Visit our website for the current list of titles.

Coastal Viewer Mapping Application:

Drilling. What is the Activity?

Transcription:

Phase 1 Geoscientific Preliminary Assessment Southern Ontario, Sedimentary Communities Presented to: Community Liaison Committees (Brockton, Huron-Kinloss, South Bruce) March 2014

Project Description» High technology, national infrastructure project o Investment of $16 billion to $24 billion o Will operate as centre of expertise o Project requires dedicated surface area of ~100 hectares (250 acres) and subsurface area of ~2.5 km x 1.5 km (375 hectares/930 acres) o Sustainable over more than 100 years» Highly regulated strict scientific and technical criteria ensure safety» Informed and willing host community» Long-term partnership between NWMO and community» Fosters community well-being» Multi-barrier system 2

Multiple Stages of Assessment and Dialogue Initial Screening (few months) Preliminary Assessment: Phase 1 (Desktop) (18 months) Preliminary Assessment: Phase 2 (Field Work) (potentially 3 yrs) Detailed Site Characterization ~ potentially 3-5 years (followed by regulatory approvals) Process guided by NWMO s values and siting principles:» Multi-year process to identify informed, willing community» Community-driven: take stock at each step» Option to withdraw for many years» Assessments focus on safety and community well-being» Respect for Aboriginal rights, treaties» Transparent, fair, clear decision-making process» Published siting factors and process» Assessments informed by broad base of expertise» Planned narrowing-down process prior to field work» Inclusive engagement that builds over time» Dialogue broadens from community out to Aboriginal people, surrounding communities, region, transportation hubs» Extended period of learning with resources and capacity-building» Respect for those communities in process :» timely reporting back on process and findings» timely decision-making» sensitive communication of results of assessments» honouring communities exiting process

Feasibility Study Components Feasibility Study Geoscientific suitability Engineering Transportation Environment and safety Environmental, social, economic and cultural considerations, and Engagement Is there the potential to find a potentially suitable site in the community? Is there the potential to safely construct the facility in the community? Is there the potential for safe and secure transportation? Is there the potential to manage any environmental effects and to ensure safety of people and the environment? Is there the potential to foster the well-being of the community and region and to lay the foundation for moving forward? 4

Technical Studies: Criteria Identified siting areas must have the potential to satisfy six safety functions considering the technical evaluation factors described in the site selection process (chapter 6): 1. Safe containment and isolation of used nuclear fuel 2. Long-term resilience to future geological processes and climate change 3. Isolation of used fuel from future human activities 4. Amenable to site characterization and data interpretation activities 5. Safe construction, operation and closure of the repository 6. Safe and secure transportation 5

Geoscientific Preliminary Assessment PHASE 1 Desktop Geoscientific Studies» For all communities electing to be the focus of a preliminary assessment» Desktop study using available geoscientific information PHASE 2 Preliminary Field Investigations» For all subset of communities selected by NWMO to further assess potential suitability of general siting areas» Site investigations that include geophysical surveys, detailed geological mapping and drilling of a limited number of boreholes 6

Geoscientific Preliminary Assessment (Phase 1) Objectives and Approach PHASE 1 Desktop Geoscientific Studies» Assess potential suitability of the communities:» Can potentially suitable general siting areas be identified within each community?» Assess relative geoscientific suitability of communities» Select a subset of preferred communities for Phase 2, taking into account other nongeoscientific factors Example community and potential siting areas B A C 7

Communities in Phase 1 0 5 10 20 30 40 Kilometres 8

Phase 1 Activities Assembly and detailed review of available geoscientific information such as geology, structural geology, natural resources, hydrogeology and overburden deposits (surficial deposits); Interpretation of available geophysical surveys; Interpretation of available borehole geophysical data and selected 2-D seismic reflection surveys to provide information on the geometry and potential structural features of the subsurface bedrock geology; Terrain analysis studies to help assess overburden (surficial deposits) type and distribution, bedrock exposures, accessibility constraints, watershed and subwatershed boundaries, groundwater discharge and recharge zones; and Assessment of land use and protected areas including parks, conservation reserves, heritage sites and source water protection areas. 9

Phase 1 Considerations Bedrock and structural geology Ordovician Cobourg Formation (limestone) within the sedimentary sequence in the area of the five communities is the preferred host rock for a used fuel deep geological repository. Minimum depth of top of the Cobourg Formation - A minimum depth of 500 m is preferred in order to maintain the integrity of a repository within the Cobourg Formation. Protected areas All known protected areas were excluded from further consideration, including: areas identified by the Communities for future development, Conservation Areas and Reserves, First Nation Reserves, Provincial Parks and Provincially Significant Wetlands. Source water protection areas - Land-based water protection zones (IPZs, Intake Protection Zones) 1 and 2, and groundwater protection areas (WHPAs, Well Head Protection Areas) A, B and C were excluded from further consideration. Surface constraints Built-up areas were excluded from further consideration. Natural resources - Not a significant constraint. 10

Interim Findings from Phase 1 Municipality of Arran-Elderslie and the Town of Saugeen Shores have limited potential to satisfy NWMO s geoscientific evaluation factors. Interim findings suggest that the Municipality of Brockton, the Township of Huron-Kinloss and the Municipality of South Bruce appear to contain areas that have the potential to satisfy NWMO s geoscientific evaluation factors. NWMO is continuing the geoscientific evaluations as part of the broader Phase 1 assessments in progress. 11

Geoscientific Preliminary Assessment ( Phase 2) Objectives and Approach PHASE 2- Preliminary Field Investigations» Further assess potential suitability and refine siting areas:» Can potentially suitable repository siting areas (in red) be identified within each community» Evaluate relative suitability of communities and select one or two preferred communities, taking into account other nongeoscientific factors Example community and potential repository siting areas 12

Geoscientific Preliminary Assessment ( Phase 2) Activities» High resolution airborne geophysical surveys» Detailed geological mapping» Drilling a limited number of vertical and/or inclined boreholes High resolution airborne geophysical surveys Detailed geological mapping Borehole drilling & testing 13

Detailed Site Evaluations» Detailed Site Evaluations will be conducted at one or more preferred sites to confirm suitability.» This step would include detailed site investigations involving geophysical surveys, characterization of the existing environment, drilling and sampling of boreholes, field and laboratory testing and monitoring activities.» This step is expected to last more than five years. Geophysics 14