Absolute energy calibration

Similar documents
Calorimeter energy calibration using the energy conservation law

Combined Calorimeters Properties Part 1.

Hadronic energy reconstruction in the combined electromagnetic and hadronic calorimeter system of the CALICE Collaboration

CALICE scintillator HCAL

Calorimeter ECAL (tungsten silicon) HCAL (tile, iron - scintillator)

CALICE Test Beam Data and Hadronic Shower Models

Jet Reconstruction and Energy Scale Determination in ATLAS

Experimental Particle Physics Informal Lecture & Seminar Series Lecture 1 Detectors Overview

CALICE Si-W EM Calorimeter: Preliminary Results of the Testbeams 2006

Collider Physics Analysis Procedures

Study of TileCal Sampling Fraction for Improvement of Monte-Carlo Data Reconstruction

ATLAS Z-Path Masterclass 2013

Application of Birks' law of scintillator nonlinearity in Geant4. Alexander Tadday Kirchhoff Institute for Physics Heidelberg University

Software compensation in particle flow reconstruction

Discovery of the W and Z 0 Bosons

V0 cross-section measurement at LHCb. RIVET analysis module for Z boson decay to di-electron

Digital Calorimetry for Future Linear Colliders. Tony Price University of Birmingham University of Birmingham PPE Seminar 13 th November 2013

NA64. Dipanwita Banerjee ETH, Zurich On behalf of the NA64 collaboration

Recent Results of + c + X and + b + X Production Cross Sections at DØ

HERA e-p scattering events observed in the H1Detector. H1 Events Joachim Meyer DESY

Lecture 2 & 3. Particles going through matter. Collider Detectors. PDG chapter 27 Kleinknecht chapters: PDG chapter 28 Kleinknecht chapters:

Diffractive production of isolated photons with the ZEUS detector at HERA

Software compensation in particle flow reconstruction

Reconstruction and identification of hadronic tau-decays in ATLAS

QCD Results from HERA

Geant3/Geant4 Comparisons - status

CEPC NOTE CEPC-RECO April 1, Higgs Signal Reconstruction at CEPC-v4 Baseline Detector for the CEPC CDR. CEPC Simulation Group

Electromagnetic calorimetry for the ILC

Introduction to CERN and CMS

Modern Accelerators for High Energy Physics

Introduction. The LHC environment. What do we expect to do first? W/Z production (L 1-10 pb -1 ). W/Z + jets, multi-boson production. Top production.

The Particle World. This talk: What is our Universe made of? Where does it come from? Why does it behave the way it does?

LHCb status. Raluca Mureşan EPFL. p.1/20

Jet Energy Calibration. Beate Heinemann University of Liverpool

Validation of Geant4 Physics Models Using Collision Data from the LHC

Studies of the diffractive photoproduction of isolated photons at HERA

AIM AIM. Study of Rare Interactions. Discovery of New High Mass Particles. Energy 500GeV High precision Lots of events (high luminosity) Requirements

David Gascón. Daniel Peralta. Universitat de Barcelona, ECM department. E Diagonal 647 (Barcelona) IFAE, Universitat Aut onoma de Barcelona

How to Measure Top Quark Mass with CMS Detector??? Ijaz Ahmed Comsats Institute of Information Technology, Islamabad

Z-Path 2014 Event Displays Examples of l + l -, and 4-lepton events

arxiv: v1 [physics.ins-det] 10 Apr 2013

Missing Transverse Energy. Performance with CMS

High Pt Top Quark Mass Reconstruction in CMS

Part II: Detectors. Peter Schleper Universität Hamburg

The Electromagnetic Calorimeter of the HERA-B Experiment

Upgrade of the CMS Forward Calorimetry

CDF top quark " $ )(! # % & '

Inclusive Cross Sections at HERA and Determinations of F L

Optimising ILD. Mark Thomson University of Cambridge. ECFA 2008, Warsaw, 11/06/08 Mark Thomson 1

Hadronic Calorimetry

Hadronic Calorimetry

Inclusive Deep-Inelastic Scattering at HERA

Matt Nguyen Rencontres QGP-France September 13 th, 2013

The art of calorimetry part III

Hadron Calorimetry at the LHC

Calorimetry at Future Particle Colliders Technologies & Reconstruction Techniques

First Stage Analysis of the Energy Response and Resolution of the Scintillator ECAL in the Beam Test at FNAL, 2008

SUSY Search at CMS. Jet+MET+0 lepton analysis Jet+MET+leptons analysis MET independent analysis Conclusions

ILD Detector Optimization and Benchmarking

Novel Measurements of Proton Structure at HERA

Jean Claude BRIENT Laboratoire Leprince Ringuet CNRS IN2P3 / Ecole polytechnique. Pavia CALOR08 J. C.Brient (LLR CNRS/Ecole polytechnique) 1

Prospective of gamma hadron correlation. study in CMS experiment

First Data Quality of the CALICE Test Beam 2008

Observation of Isolated High-E T Photons in Photoproduction at HERA

Z 0 Resonance Analysis Program in ROOT

Feasibility of a cross-section measurement for J/ψ->ee with the ATLAS detector

Transition Radiation Detector for GlueX

Particle ID in ILD. Masakazu Kurata, KEK Calorimeter Workshop IAS program 01/19/2018

Particle Flow Algorithms

NuSOnG Detector Resolution, Calibration, and Event Separation

First Stage Analysis of the Energy response and resolution of the Scintillator ECAL in the Beam Test at FNAL, 2008

Inclusive SUSY Searches at CMS with Emphasis on Detector Systematics

Analog vs. Digital Hadron Calorimetry for the ILC

Searches for long-lived particles at CMS

Calorimeter test-beam results with APDs

Tau Lepton Reconstruction in ATLAS. Tau 2016 Conference, Beijing, 21st September 2016

SUSY Searches at CMS in the Fully Hadronic Channel

The first Z boson measurement in the dimuon channel in PbPb collisions at s = 2.76 TeV at CMS

Study of Quark compositeness in pp q * at CMS

Shower fine structure

Spacal alignment and calibration

Measurements of the Proton F L and F 2 Structure Functions at Low x at HERA

Seaches fo log-lived paticles with displaced signatues at the LHC. Daniela Salvatore (INFN Cosenza) on behalf of the ATLAS and CMS Collaborations

Analyses with photons or electrons with early LHC data at the CMS experiment

Analysis of Top Quarks Using a Kinematic Likelihood Method

Neutrinos & the MINOS Experiment

CMS Higgs Results Adi Bornheim Caltech

Jet reconstruction in LHCb searching for Higgs-like particles

Overview of validations at LHC

Measurement of Quenched Energy Flow for Dijets in PbPb collisions with CMS

Richard Hall-Wilton University College London. July 2002

Study of di-muon production with the ZEUS detector at HERA

Calorimetry in particle physics experiments

Forward QCD studies and prospects at the LHC

Searches for new Physics at HERA

Simulation study of scintillatorbased

Usage of GEANT 4 versions: 6, 7 & 8 in BABAR

Detectors in Nuclear and High Energy Physics. RHIG summer student meeting June 2014

The achievements of the CERN proton antiproton collider

Transition Radiation Detector for GlueX

Transcription:

E coeffs 1 Absolute energy calibration V. Morgunov DESY, Hamburg and ITEP, Moscow HCAL main meeting, DESY, January 19, 26 The copy of this talk one can find at the http://www.desy.de/ morgunov Jan 19, 26, DESY

E coeffs 2 Introduction I would like to show the first results for the fresh simulated events by Mokka at the GRID. And a new absolute energy calibration method. Jan 19, 26, DESY

E coeffs 3 How to get calorimeter energy conversion coeffs? Easy: One should run muons in Monte Carlo, take whole energy in absorber and scintillator, and divide it by energy in the scintillator. The reason for this is: if one particle crosses one sampling layer it should deposit the whole energy, but we can measure the scintillator energy only. But: the cascade in matter consists of not only pure particles (track like) but rather dense electromagnetic showers and a mixture of the photoeffect s and compton scattered electrons together with pure track like energy deposition. This leads to the co called e/π ratio for the calorimeter response for different types of particles. The using of the complex calorimeter, which we have in LDC detector, leads to even more tricky procedure for the calibration, because it needs to define the coeffs for each part of the calorimeter with different samplings and then choose the correct ratio between that coeffs to get a correct whole measured energy. So, let us start from the coeffs defined by muon run in the simulation. C = E whole /E visible for each sampling structures, that is in our case three of them. Jan 19, 26, DESY

E coeffs 4 How to get a whole event energy conservation? Hcal energy () 6 5 Old coeffs for t tbar to 6 jets, 5 The simple formula should give us an answer E Ecal + E Hcal = E CM but, we have no this see a picture. 4 So, let us rotate the black line to the position of the red one by rescaling the coefficient of 3 energy conversion (see previous slide). Rotation actually means of the affine trans- 2 formation of this 2 D space. (see next slide) 1 These rotated coeffs consist of all the properties of the whole LDC calorimeters as well as the flavor s containment of the jets! 1 2 3 4 5 6 Ecal energy () Jan 19, 26, DESY

E coeffs 5 The black line equation is: How to rotate? a E Ecal + E Hcal = a (c 1 E vis1 + c 2 E vis2 ) + c 3 H vis = E where: c 1, c 2 and c 3 is an initial energy conversion coeffs, a is the slope which give us the minimal energy width. E is some constant the line should come through the most probable value of the initial energy sum. By the way; if the initial coeffs were bad fitted to the intrinsic mutual calorimeter properties (bad inter calibration), one will never get the sharp top right edge of the energy distribution as well as the most probable line! The red line equation is: E calib ECAL + Ecalib HCAL = E CM energy conservation law. Then we got the new coeffs: where: f = E CM /E ; and Let us require E = E CM and a = 1 exactly. c calib 1 = fa c 1, c calib 2 = fa c 2 and c calib 3 = fc 3 ; c calib 1 E vis1 + c calib 2 E vis2 + c calib 3 H vis = E CM along the most probable line These three coeffs will be applied latter on to each hit in the particular sampling regions of the calorimeter. Jan 19, 26, DESY

E coeffs 6 The results of rotation/rescaling are Hcal energy () 1 8 New coeffs for t tbar to 6 jets, 1 Hcal energy () 5 45 4 New coeffs for t tbar to 6 jets, 5 Hcal energy () 5 45 4 New coeffs for e+ e- to heavy quarks, 5 35 35 6 3 3 25 25 4 2 2 15 15 2 1 1 5 5 2 4 6 8 1 Ecal energy () 5 1 15 2 25 3 35 4 45 5 Ecal energy () 5 1 15 2 25 3 35 4 45 5 Ecal energy () Hcal energy () 1 8 New coeffs for W+ W- to everything, 1 Hcal energy () 5 45 4 New coeffs for W+ W- to everything, 5 Hcal energy () 5 45 4 New coeffs for e+ e- to light quarks, 5 35 35 6 3 3 25 25 4 2 2 15 15 2 1 1 5 5 2 4 6 8 1 Ecal energy () 5 1 15 2 25 3 35 4 45 5 Ecal energy () 5 1 15 2 25 3 35 4 45 5 Ecal energy () Jan 19, 26, DESY

E coeffs 7 Calorimeter energy sum 12 New coeffs for t tbar to 6 jets, 1 Constant 15.8 Mean 982.5 Sigma 24.64 14 New coeffs for t tbar to 6 jets, 5 Constant 111.9 Mean 488.8 Sigma 16.9 14 New coeffs for e+ e- to heavy quarks, 5 Constant 14.5 Mean 495. Sigma 14.78 1 12 12 8 1 1 8 8 6 6 6 4 4 4 2 2 2 2 4 6 8 1 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 7 New coeffs for W+ W- to everything, 1 Constant 64.38 Mean 992.6 Sigma 25.47 8 New coeffs for W+ W- to everything, 5 Constant 71.89 Mean 496.6 Sigma 14.52 16 New coeffs for e+ e- to light quarks, 5 Constant 139.9 Mean 497.9 Sigma 14.9 6 7 14 5 6 12 4 5 1 4 8 3 3 6 2 2 4 1 1 2 2 4 6 8 1 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Jan 19, 26, DESY

E coeffs 8 Check plots 12 1 Check quality, t tbar to 6 jets, 1 Constant 13. Mean.1879 Sigma 18.69 1 Check quality, t tbar to 6 jets, 5 Constant 87.81 Mean 1.22 Sigma 12.62 1 Check quality, e+ e- to heavy quarks, 5 Constant 79.47 Mean -.4959 Sigma 12.84 8 8 8 6 6 6 4 4 4 2 2 2-1 -75-5 -25 25 5 75 1-6 -4-2 2 4 6-6 -4-2 2 4 6 18 16 Check quality, W+ W- to everything, 1 Constant 11.8 Mean 2.684 Sigma 17.37 14 12 Check quality, W+ W- to everything, 5 Constant 98.97 Mean 1.567 Sigma 1.89 9 8 Check quality, e+ e- to light quarks, 5 Constant 72.4 Mean -1.73 Sigma 14.14 14 1 7 12 6 1 8 5 8 6 4 6 4 3 4 2 2 2 1-1 -75-5 -25 25 5 75 1-6 -4-2 2 4 6-6 -4-2 2 4 6 Jan 19, 26, DESY

E coeffs 9 For reference Z pole reaction Hcal energy () 1 8 Z to everything, 91.2 18 16 14 Z to everything, 91.2 Constant 152.3 Mean 9.44 Sigma 4.67 12 6 1 8 4 6 2 4 2 2 4 6 8 1 Ecal energy () 2 4 6 8 1 12 All decay channels are allowed. Jan 19, 26, DESY

E coeffs 1 Let us check the result 12 1 Check quality, Z to everything, 91.2 Constant 99.7 Mean -.5865E-1 Sigma 4.247 Sigma = 44.5 % 8 6 4 2-6 -4-2 2 4 6 Jan 19, 26, DESY

E coeffs 11 Marlin Reco also knows about this LDC (tile HCal), 4T 4 35 3 χ 2 / ndf 139.8 / 63 Prob 1.517e-8 Normalisation 369.5 Mean -.8576 Sigma Central Part 3.399 Sigma Left Tail 9.77 Sigma Right Tail 7.756 Fraction Central Part.7956 25 2 15 1 5-6 -4-2 2 4 6 Jan 19, 26, DESY

E coeffs 12 Conclusion Let us use the energy conservation law with its full power. Jan 19, 26, DESY

E coeffs 13 After the conclusion Picture from ZEUS experiment at HERA. Here is no one line can be used to rotate coeffs. But much more complex method is still available for this case for the absolute energy calibration. Only Linear Collider might give us a possibility to use energy conservation law. Jan 19, 26, DESY