Implementation of the Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Act in Los Angeles County

Similar documents
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT POLICY & PROCEDURE

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT POLICY & PROCEDURE

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT POLICY & PROCEDURE

9. GEOLOGY, SOILS, AND MINERALS

GEOLOGY AND SOILS. This chapter summarizes geologic and geotechnical aspects of the site as they relate to the Project.

Geotechnical Extreme Events Reconnaissance Report:

LANDUSE APPLICATIONS OF EARTHQUAKE HAZARD MAPS CALIFORNIA EXPERIENCE

IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS E. GEOLOGY/SOILS

IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS G. GEOLOGY AND SOILS

County of Santa Cruz

COMMENT CARD RESPONSES (SEISMIC)

IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS E. GEOLOGY AND SOILS

IV. Environmental Impact Analysis D. Geology

4.5 GEOLOGY AND SEISMICITY

Appendix C - Geotechnical Report. Landmark Consultants, Inc.

IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS F. GEOLOGY AND SOILS

IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS E. GEOLOGY AND SOILS

4.5 GEOLOGY, SOILS AND SEISMICITY

PROBABILISTIC SURFACE FAULT DISPLACEMENT HAZARD ANALYSIS (PFDHA) DATA FOR STRIKE SLIP FAULTS

5.11 Geology and Soils

IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS E. GEOLOGY AND SOILS

Guidelines for Site-Specific Seismic Hazard Reports for Essential and Hazardous Facilities and Major and Special-Occupancy Structures in Oregon

COUNTY OF SONOMA PERMIT AND RESOURCE MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT 2550 Ventura Avenue, Santa Rosa, CA (707) FAX (707)

Appendix 2. Extracts from Ministry for the Environment Active Fault Guidelines 2003

Seismic Geotechnical Hazard Zonation Of Geological Factors

Surface Faulting and Deformation Assessment & Mitigation

SLOPE STABILITY EVALUATION AND ACCEPTANCE STANDARDS

4.5 GEOLOGY AND SOILS

SLOPE STABILITY EVALUATION AND ACCEPTANCE STANDARDS

IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS K. GEOLOGIC AND SEISMIC HAZARDS

5. Environmental Analysis

3E. Geology and Soils

Executive Summaries for the Century City Area Tunneling Safety Report and Fault Investigation Report

4.5 GEOLOGY AND SOILS

IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS E. GEOLOGY/SOILS

Impact : Changes to Existing Topography (Less than Significant)

HOUSE BILL No June 19, 2007, Introduced by Reps. Warren, Ward, Gillard, Wojno and Bauer and referred to the Committee on Regulatory Reform.

Managing Recognized Hazards: Land Use Planning and Zoning, Strategies and Public Education/Notification

5. Environmental Analysis

Roy Pyle March 24, 2017 Chief Facilities Planner Contra Costa Community College District 500 North Court Street Martinez, CA 94533

GEOLOGY, SOILS, AND SEISMICITY

Response to Leighton Consulting Report

SURFACE GEOLOGY AND LIQUEFACTION SUSCEPTIBILITY IN THE INNER RIO GRANDE VALLEY NEAR ALBUQUERQUE, NEW MEXICO

4.6 GEOLOGY AND SEISMICITY

4.5 GEOLOGY AND SOILS

Earthquakes.

IV. Environmental Impact Analysis D. Geology and Soils

GOAL 7 AREAS SUBJECT TO NATURAL DISASTERS AND HAZARDS. To protect life and property from natural disasters and hazards.

4.5 Geology and Soils

FAULT-RUPTURE HAZARD ZONES IN CALIFORNIA

4.L GEOLOGY, SOILS, AND SEISMICITY 4.L.1 INTRODUCTION

5. Environmental Analysis

4.6 GEOLOGIC AND SEISMIC HAZARDS

Report to the Seventy-first Legislative Assembly on the Implementation of 1999 Senate Bill 12 Relating to Public Safety and Rapidly Moving Landslides

Estimation of Short Term Shelter Needs FEMA Earthquake HAZUS Model

PHIMF Project - Limited Geotechnical Investigation - Feasibility-Level Report RESPONSE TO INITIAL REVIEW LETTER

5.3 GEOLOGY AND SOILS

C.Y. Geotech, Inc. Soil Engineering Investigation Victory Boulevard, Van Nuys, California. August 31, Ibid.

IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS C. GEOLOGY/SOILS

APPENDIX IV.A Geotechnical Study

2.10 Geology/Soils/Seismic/Topography

4.6 GEOLOGY AND SOILS

Mitigation Strategies for Earthquake Surface Rupture Hazard in the Basin and Range Province

A Method for Mapping Settlement Area Boundaries in the Greater Golden Horseshoe

CHAPTER GEOLOGICALLY HAZARDOUS AREAS Applicability Regulations.

Setting MOUNTAIN HOUSE NEIGHBORHOODS I AND J INITIAL STUDY 5. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST 6. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Issue

Fault-Rupture Hazard Zones in California

Earthquake Hazards in Henderson

Seismically Induced Ground Failure

Section 5.7 Geology and Soils

APPLICATIONS OF EARTHQUAKE HAZARD MAPS TO LAND-USE AND EMERGENCY PLANNING EXAMPLES FROM THE PORTLAND AREA

IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS G. GEOLOGY AND SOILS

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS C. GEOLOGY


5.9 Geology and Soils

Probabilistic Estimation of Site Specific Fault Displacements

3E. Geology and Soils

4.6 GEOLOGY AND SOILS

EXPLORATION NEWS RELEASE MAGISTRAL DISTRICT: MORE GROWTH, MORE GOLD, MORE SILVER

3.1.3 Geology and Soils

Seismic Hazard Assessment of the San Joaquin Hills Using GIS

5.5 Geology, Soils and Seismicity

Shasta Valley Groundwater Basin Boundary Modification

Geotechnical Geologic Coastal Environmental

Downtown Anchorage Seismic Risk Assessment & Land Use Regulations to Mitigate Seismic Risk

4.6 GEOLOGY, SOILS, AND MINERAL RESOURCES

4.7 GEOLOGY AND SOILS

The Earthquake Cycle Chapter :: n/a

Zoning Ordinance. Requirements Used Districts R1 R2 R2.6 R3 R4 R5 B1 B2 B3 B4 M1 M2 RH Density Low Low Med Med High High Gen Local CBD Local LT Hvy Ag

Earthquake Hazards in Douglas County

E-3: VAN BEVEREN & BUTELO, INC., TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM GEOTECHNICAL INPUT TO ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATION

November 16, 2016 Revised August 15, 2017 File No Trammell Crow Company 2221 Rosecrans Avenue, Suite 200 El Segundo, California 90245

Geology, Soils, and Seismicity

3.6 Geology, Soils, Mineral Resources, and Paleontological Resources

Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council

4.4 GEOLOGY AND SOILS Existing Conditions

PRELIMINARY WORKING DRAFT Work in Progress

Preliminary Geotechnical and Environmental Report

TODAY - March 20, 2000

COUNTY OF GLENN BOARD REPORT. Submitted by Department of Agriculture

Transcription:

Implementation of the Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Act in Los Angeles County Charles Nestle County of Los Angeles Dept. of Public Works Surface Fault Rupture Workshop May 10, 2013

What Work is Governed by the Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Act?

California Public Resources Code 2621.6 Project defined (1) Any subdivision of land which contemplates the eventual construction of structures for human occupancy. (2) Structures for human occupancy, with the exception of a single-family wood-frame or steel-frame dwelling not exceeding two stories when that dwelling is not part of a development of four or more dwellings.

What is the intent of the Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Act?

California Public Resources Code 2621.5(a) Purpose and application of chapter The Legislature declares that this chapter is intended to provide policies and criteria to assist cities, counties, and state agencies in the exercise of their responsibility to prohibit the location of developments and structures for human occupancy across the trace of active faults.

California Code of Regulations 3600. Purpose It is the purpose of this subchapter to set forth the policies and criteria of the State Mining and Geology Board, to prohibit the location of developments and structures for human occupancy across the trace of active faults. The policies and criteria set forth herein shall be limited to potential hazards resulting from surface faulting or fault creep within earthquake fault zones delineated on maps officially issued by the State Geologist.

California Code of Regulations 3603(a). Specific Criteria No structure for human occupancy, identified as a project under Section 2621.6 of the Act, shall be permitted to be placed across the trace of an active fault.

Definitions and interpretation

California Code of Regulations 3601(e). Definitions A "structure for human occupancy" is any structure used or intended for supporting or sheltering any use or occupancy, which is expected to have a human occupancy rate of more than 2,000 person-hours per year.

California Code of Regulations 3601(a). Definitions An "active fault" is a fault that has had surface displacement within Holocene time (about the last 11,000 years), hence constituting a potential hazard to structures that might be located across it

California Code of Regulations 3601(b). Definitions A "fault trace" is that line formed by the intersection of a fault and the earth's surface, and is the representation of a fault as depicted on a map, including maps of earthquake fault zones

Active Fault This definition does not, of course, mean that faults having no evidence for surface displacement within Holocene time are necessarily inactive. A fault may be presumed to be inactive based on satisfactory geologic evidence; however, the evidence necessary to prove inactivity sometimes is difficult to obtain and locally may not exist. California Geological Survey Special Publication 42 (rev. 2007), pg. 5.

Active Fault If appropriate data cannot be provided, then the presence of an active fault trace within the area of investigation must be assumed. County of Los Angeles Manual for the Preparation of Geotechnical Reports December 2010, pg. 13.

Does The A-P Act Specify a Setback?

California Code of Regulations 3603(a). Specific Criteria Furthermore, as the area within fifty (50) feet of such active faults shall be presumed to be underlain by active branches of that fault unless proven otherwise by an appropriate geologic investigation no such structures shall be permitted in this area.

Other Issues

A-P Fault Zone Boundaries Zone boundaries on early maps were positioned about 660 feet away from the fault traces to accommodate imprecise locations of the faults and possible existence of active branches. The policy since 1977 is to position the boundary about 500 feet away from major active faults and about 200 to 300 feet away from well-defined, minor faults. California Geological Survey Special Publication 42 (rev. 2007), pg. 6.

California Code of Regulations 3603. Specific Criteria (f) One (1) copy of all such geologic reports shall be filed with the State Geologist by the lead agency within thirty (30) days following the reports acceptance. The State Geologist shall place such reports on open file.

Questions Is there any concern that supporting infrastructure is permitted to be placed within a fault zone? Does the County view denial of a project based on an 11,000+ year old hazard as extreme? Is the County concerned that the avoidance of an 11,000+ year old hazard does not balance against the 475 year return period for structural design?

Questions?