Underground Drilling and Packer Test in Fault F16 of Wugou Coal Mine

Similar documents
The Mine Geostress Testing Methods and Design

Journal of Engineering Science and Technology Review 10 (6) (2017) Research Article

A BOOKLET ON. T Rangasamy, A R Leach and A P Cook. Facilitating safety and health research in the South African mining industry

HYDROGEOLOGICAL PROPERTIES OF THE UG2 PYROXENITE AQUIFERS OF THE BUSHVELD COMPLEX

Characteristics of Deformation and Destruction to the Mining Roadway Floor of Three-soft Thick Coal Seam by Field Measurement

Fig. 1 Location of the New Shanghai No. 1 Mine in Inner Mongolia, China.

Numerical Analysis on Shaft Lining Stability during Aquifer Quick Drainage in Eastern Chinese Coal Mines

Evaluation of Hydraulic Characteristics of the Normal Fault Based on Key Data

The Detection Method of Fire Abnormal Based on Directional Drilling in Complex Conditions of Mine

HOW. HOW vehicle mounted units portable units also available. HOW, WHEN & WHY to Geophysically Log in S.I.?

Mining-Caused Activation of Fault

EAS 233 Geologic Structures and Maps Winter Miscellaneous practice map exercises. 1. Fault and separation:

Gotechnical Investigations and Sampling

Main Means of Rock Stress Measurement

Pressure Grouting of Fractured Bedrock to Control Acid Mine Drainage

Study of Soft Rock Roadway Support Technique

Analysis of the Factors Causing Roof Water Inrush in Coal Seam Mining with Thin Bedrock

25th International Conference on Ground Control in Mining

DEPILLARING DEPILLARING OF THE ANJAN HILL 0 SEAM WORKINGS

Water Inrush Prevention in Polish Coal Mines

Optimum Size of Coal Pillar Dimensions Serving Mechanised Caving Longwall Face in a Thick Seam

Automatic Drawing of the Complicated Geological Faults

STUDY ON THE LAW OF MINING STRESS EVOLUTION AND FAULT ACTIVATION UNDER THE INFLUENCE OF NORMAL FAULT

Numerical Simulation on Support of Roadway with Compound Roof and Large Cross Section

A STUDY ON THE BLASTING VIBRATION CONTROL OF CREEP MASS HIGH SLOPE

Roadway Support Technology with Sliding Cracking Surrounding Rock under Tectonic Stress

Monday 2 June 2014 Morning

End-wall Slope Stability Analysis of Surface Coal Mine under the Combined Open-pit Mining with Underground Mining

Research on Coal Pillar Width in Roadway Driving Along Goaf Based on The Stability of Key Block

PALEOKARST CRUST OF ORDOVICIAN LIMESTONE AND ITS CAPABILITY IN RESISTING WATER INRUSHES IN COAL MINES OF NORTH CHINA

Experimental Study on the Mechanical Properties of Coal Seam as a Main Aquifer of Xiaojihan Coal Mine

Waterview Connection Tunnels

Delineation of Zones at Risk from Groundwater Inflows at an Underground Platinum Mine in South Africa

Bedrock Dewatering for Construction of Marmet and Soo Lock Projects

Boreholes. Implementation. Boring. Boreholes may be excavated by one of these methods: 1. Auger Boring 2. Wash Boring 3.

Successful Use of a Stress Relief Roadway at Appin Colliery

SYLLABUS AND REFERENCES FOR THE STRATA CONTROL CERTIFICATE. METALLIFEROUS MINING OPTION Updated November 1998

10. GEOTECHNICAL EXPLORATION PROGRAM

SYLLABUS AND REFERENCES FOR THE STRATA CONTROL CERTIFICATE COAL MINING OPTION

NAME HOMEWORK ASSIGNMENT #3 MATERIAL COVERS CHAPTERS 8, 9, 10, 11

Support stability mechanism in a coal face with large angles in both strike and dip

Numerical Analysis of the Influence of Seepage on the Displacement Law of Different Overburden Strata

Lab 6: Plate tectonics, structural geology and geologic maps

A simulation study of support break-off and water inrush during mining under the high confined and thick unconsolidated aquifer

Appendix Z. Groundwater Assessment Supplementary Report. Document Name i Insert Month/Year

APPIN MINE 708D PRESSURE BUMPS

Faults. Strike-slip fault. Normal fault. Thrust fault

Answers: Internal Processes and Structures (Isostasy)

Geomechanical controls on fault and fracture distribution with application to structural permeability and hydraulic stimulation

11/22/2010. Groundwater in Unconsolidated Deposits. Alluvial (fluvial) deposits. - consist of gravel, sand, silt and clay

=%REPORT RECONNAISSANCE OF CHISHOLM LAKE PROSPECT. October 25, 1977

UNIT 10 MOUNTAIN BUILDING AND EVOLUTION OF CONTINENTS

Appendix 6 Geotechnical report

Answer sheet for question 1 Answer question 1 as soon as the sample arrives at your desk.

Open Access Support Technique of Horse Head in Weakly Cemented Soft Rock

Study the architecture and processes responsible for deformation of Earth s crust. Folding and Faulting

Construction Technical Specifications on Rock-Foundation Excavating Engineering of Hydraulic Structures

Lab 7: STRUCTURAL GEOLOGY FOLDS AND FAULTS

Effect Of The In-Situ Stress Field On Casing Failure *

Experimental investigation into stress-relief characteristics with upward large height and upward mining under hard thick roof

Risks of environmental contamination from proposed fracking in the Fylde, Lancashire

Name. GEOL.5220 Structural Geology Faults, Folds, Outcrop Patterns and Geologic Maps. I. Properties of Earth Materials

Hydro-chemical Characters and Ions Source of Groundwater from Qidong Coal Mine, Northern Anhui Province, China

Section 19.1: Forces Within Earth Section 19.2: Seismic Waves and Earth s Interior Section 19.3: Measuring and Locating.

The layered water injection research of thin oil zones of Xing Shu Gang oil field Yikun Liu, Qingyu Meng, Qiannan Yu, Xinyuan Zhao

Underground Excavation Design Classification

Effects of load distribution exerting on coal pillars on the stress and energy distribution of the floor strata

Rock slope rock wedge stability

Module 1 : Site Exploration and Geotechnical Investigation

Slake Durability of a Deep Red Stratum Sandstone under Different Environments

Time-lapse geophysical technology-based study on overburden strata changes induced by modern coal mining

ontribution of Geotechnical and Rock echanics design to vertical shaft nking and design

PROBLEM SET #X. 2) Draw a cross section from A-A using the topographic profile provided on page 3.

Evaluation of Geological Conditions Ahead of Tunnel Face Using Seismic Tomography between Tunnel and Surface

Investigation into strata behaviour and fractured zone height in a high-seam longwall coal mine

GEOLOGIC MAPS PART II

Evaluating the role of groundwater in the stability of slopes in an open pit coal mine with shallow dipping multi-seam stratigraphy.

Western Kentucky CO 2 Storage Test

Coal Loss and Dilution Considerations for Western Canadian Foothills Open Pit Coal Projects

Staple this part to part one of lab 6 and turn in. Lab 6, part two: Structural geology (analysis)

SECOND DRILL HOLE IHAD2 INTERSECTS MINERALIZED TAPLEY HILL FORMATION AND MINERALIZED BASEMENT IRON FORMATION

Geotechnical modelling based on geophysical logging data

A STUDY ON NUMERICAL SIMULATION DURING CHEMICAL GROUTING

PHYSICAL AND MECHANICAL PARAMETERS OF BOREHOLE HYDRAULIC MINING OF NONG AN OIL SHALE

M. Cushing 1, A. Revil 2,3, C.. Gélis 1, D. Jougnot 3, F. Lemeille 1, J. Cabrera 1, A. De Hoyos 1, M. Rocher 1. Introduction

Crags, Cracks, and Crumples: Crustal Deformation and Mountain Building

Groundwater Rebound in the South Yorkshire Coalfield: A review of initial modelling

Interactions of overburden failure zones due to multiple-seam mining using longwall caving

UNFC COAL MINES CASE STUDIES

DESTRESS BLASTING AS A PROACTIVE MEASURE AGAINST ROCKBURSTS. PETR KONICEK Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Geonics

Central Queensland Coal Project Appendix 4b Geotechnical Assessment. Environmental Impact Statement

The Experimental Research of the Effect of Heating Temperature and Heating Time for Oil Shale Crack

ANALYTICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL STUDY OF WATER SEEPAGE PROPAGATION BEHAVIOR IN THE FAULT

AVON DAM MONITORING BOREHOLES REPORT

Stress and Strain. Stress is a force per unit area. Strain is a change in size or shape in response to stress

Geology of Landscapes Chapter 6 (Building Earth s Surface Faulting and Folding)

N.Nikolaev Antech TFA ltd, Sofia, Bulgaria. V.Parushev University of Mining and Geology, Sofia, Bulgaria. S.Nikolaev Antech TFA Ltd.

N. J. Macala. C ONTENT S. LIST OF PLATES.

Making the Most out of Downhole Geophysics. Travis Pastachak, P.Geo, PMP

Key Stage 3 - Volcano Fracking

Transcription:

An Interdisciplinary Response to Mine Water Challenges - Sui, Sun & Wang (eds) 2014 China University of Mining and Technology Press, Xuzhou, ISBN 978-7-5645-0125-5 Underground Drilling and Packer Test in Fault F16 of Wugou Coal Mine Yaowen Yang, Hua Yang, Junsong Wu, Jian Jie, Qiuju Zheng Wugou Coal Mine, Wanbei Coal & Electricity Group Co., Ltd., Huaibei, Anhui Abstract Fault F16 of Wugou Coal Mine is located in the north-west direction of the mine, which is a large normal fault. With a fall of 30-150 m, strike length within the coal mine is about 2.24km. Air roadway of the 1031 working face's mechanical lane is near F16 normal fault, tunneling along the anti-pillar line of the fault's hanging side. Because of the influence of F16 normal fault, distance between coal mine of the 10th mine seam in the hanging side and the limestone of Taiyuan Formation in the heading side was further reduced. There is certain danger of water inrush of Taiyuan Formation due to the mining. Location, throw, and water transmissibility of the F16 fault was further detected by means of underground drilling and pressure water test, hydro-geological parameters of permeable rate and osmotic coefficient of F16 fault are obtained, giving the key basis for the setting up of the coal pillar for F16 fault in a reasonable way. Keywords fault, packer test, hydrological parameters General situation of fault F16 F16 is located in the north-west direction of the mine, and in the north of the 1031 working face, it is a large normal fault. Three-dimensional seismic ground control: the 5th coal seam leaped to Ordovician limestone, with a NNE strike and a SSW tendency, with a strike length of 2.24 km in the mine, dip angle of 70 m, fall of 30-150 m. The east and Wugou fault intersect, controlled by drilling holes of J1-6, J1-4, and Bu22. The Bu 22 drilling hole revealed the F16 fault, the fault zone is located at the drilling-hole's depth of 355.10 m, with a fall of 80m. Pumping test was performed with osmotic coefficients respectively 0.8333 m/d, 0.9562 m/d, 1.0554 m/d. The fault is almost paralleled to the 1031 working face, about 84-141 m from the air way of the working face, there is no practical data at present. Working face is at the hanging side (downthrown side) of the fault. The effective water-resisting layer between baseboard in the 10th coal seam and limestone in Taiyuan Formation is further reduced even connected. To further control the location, fall, and water transmissibility of the F16 fault, 2 sets of searching drilling holes are designed to perform searching and pressure water test so as to provide geological proof for the safety recovering on the 1031 working face. Geological and hydrogeololgical conditions of the construction section Geological and coal seam condition of the construction section Construction section is located in the TZ3 drilling site of 1031 air way, near hanging side of the normal fault F16. Secondary faults and fractures may be more developed near the fault. 10th coal seam is in the middle of Shanxi Formation. It is 42.95-60.99 m away from the aluminum mudstone of the lower Shihezi formation, and 33.15-51.55 m from the limestone of Taiyuan Formation. Thickness of coal is 2.44-5.47 m. The direct roof of the 10th coal seam gradually turns from siltstone into fine-grained sandstone. The upper roof is consisted of light gray fine-grained sandstone, interbedding with the dark gray mudstone showing an horizontal bedding. Carbonaceous components are shown in the bedding planes. 587

The direct baseboard consists of dark gray siltstone, mainly with aleuritic texture and containing line shaped light gray fine sand. The older baseboard is interbedded with sandstone and mudstone.11th coal seam is about 12-24 m under 10th coal seam. Thickness of the coal of 11th coal seam is 0.5 m. Hydrological conditions of the construction section Main influence of the construction section is from crevice aquifer of both top and bottom board in the 10th coal seam, as well as the aquifer from the limestone of the baseboard. Sandstone crevices in the sandstone aquifer are rarely seen, with a poor aquosity. Coal seam of the hanging side connects with limestone from the opposite side due to the big fall of F16 fault. Gushing may occur because that aquifer in the opposite side may be drilled into when drilling hole going through F16 fault. According to the real-time water level (-39.21 m) of the 6th water hole (Long observation holes in the limestone of Taiyuan Formation), max pressure water of the limestone of the test section is calculated as 3.45 MPa.Max gushing amount for a single drilling-hole is predicted to be 50 m 3 /h. Underground drilling of fault F16 Drilling site: TZ3 drilling site of 1031airway, shown in the pressure water test plan (Fig.1). Actually 6 searching holes are constructed, with a total work amount of 769 m. Of them, T6#: azimuth 328, dip angle 11, depth of hole 95 m, fractured zones with a width of 5m are seen at the depth of 85.5~91m, limestone from the heading side is seen at 91~95 m. Effluent rate of the final hole is 5 m 3 /h. T6# is also the pressure water hole; T7#:azimuth 28, dip angle 17, depth of the hole 133 m, coal from footwall 11 is seen at 106.7~112.8 m; T8#: azimuth 28, dip angle 0, depth of hole 99 m, limestone from the heading side is seen at 97~99 m, effluent rate of the final hole is 10 m 3 /h; T9#:azimuth 28, dip angle -5, depth of hole 107 m, limestone of the heading side is seen at 101.5~107 m, effluent rate of the final hole is 0.5 m 3 /h. Fig. 1 Plan of pressure water test Synthetic analysis of drilling: dip angle of fault F16 is 67~80, fall of 75 m. Distance between air way and the intersecting line of fault and coal seam ranges from 77 to 95 m. Width of fault zone varies from 4 to 5 m. No water containing and flowing is seen in the fault. See the searching profile of fault F16 (fig. 2). 588

Fig.2 Searching profile of F16 fault Pressure water test of fault F16 Trial objective Pressure water test is to press water into the drilling holes by means of high pressure, an insitu test according to the soakage of the rock body to calculate and know the development and water permeability of rock body. Specialized sealing equipment is applied in pressure water test to segregate off drilling test section with certain length, and then applied fixed water head to drill hole and drain water for this section. Water penetrates into the rock body through the crevices around the wall of holes. Penetrated water amount finally tends to be a fixed value. Intensity of water permeability can be determined according to the length of test section and water yield of stable penetration. For this time, high pressure water test is done mainly in the fault zones. Length of test section is determined according to the width of faults that are actually drilled and searched. High pressure water test simulates the gushing and inrush from space as much as possible. Test procedures Considering the long construction period, high cost of the ground pressure water test, but since the effect of pressure water test is nearly as same as that on the ground. So it's determined to carry out the high pressure water test for fault F16 at 75-83 m within the drilling hole T6#, and underground airway 1031 drilling site TZ3. (1)The confirmation of testing water pressure Water pressure of limestone in the strata of the test section is calculated as 3.45MPa, according to the real-time water level (-39.21m) of the 6th water hole (limestone in Taiyuan Formation). To make a true simulation of the limestone water, making use of existing equipments synthetically, testing pressure water of the high pressure is set to be 4Mpa. The 7 pressure stages of 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 3.0 2.0 1.0 are applied. Medium-speed method is applied as the way of boosting. Duration of each pressure stage is 30min. (2) Experiment process Drilling in casing coring slip casting drill-hole cleaning drill-hole washing connection of pressurized water tube performing observation of pressure and the pressed in water amount in the pressure water test stage performing data arrangement and curve verification on site. (1) Flush holes in positive cycle method. Hole-washing drilling tools should be drilled to the 589

bottom of holes. Flow rate should be the max output of the water pumps. Piston suction method is appropriate for the holes with severe blockage of rock powder. Standard for the accomplishment of hole flushing is that back water of the orifice is clean and thickness of sediments at the bottom is less than 0.2 m. (2) Adjust the testing pressure to the index value and keep it stable. Then start observing the pressure and flow. (3) The interval between pressure and flow observation is 1 or 2 min. On condition that pressure keeps the same, and there is no continuous growing trend, and the difference value between the max and the min values of all the 5 readings of the flow is less than 10% of the final reading or less than 1 L/min. Test of this stage shall be ended and the final value is taken as the calculation value. (4) Repeat the testing processes above by following the pressure stage and corresponding pressure value until test of this stage is accomplished. (5) If there is any back flow in depressurization stage, the back flow shall be recorded until the back flow stops and its flow rate reaches the required standard. (6) During the testing period, water inflow near the testing holes shall be observed. (7) After finishing the test, draw P-Q curves in order to check whether the test results are true. Device installation and matters needing attention (1) Installation diagram for devices Diagrammatic drawing for installation of testing devices with high pressure water is shown as fig.3 Fig.3 Diagrammatic drawing of the installation for devices of pressing water in holes (2) Matters needing attention in the test (1) Testing equipment and instruments shall meet the required regulations. Water pump shall be equipped with more than 2 cylinders and its pressure keeps stable. Flow during water injection and pressurization shall be no less than 120 L/min, effluent shall be well-distributed. Pressure gauge and water level gauge shall response quickly, working pressure shall be kept within 1/3-3/4 of the range of extreme pressure value. (2) Joints shall be all well sealed. Otherwise, curves will deform due to the data distortion caused by water leakage. (3) Holes shall be flushed clean. Otherwise, E type curves are easily seen, and the permeable rate is low. (4) Pressure during the second grouting of T6# hole shall not be too high, so as to ensure that the fault zone will not be wholly blocked, which will affect the results of pressure water test. 590

(5) Diamond bits are allowed for use in priority if meeting the requirements of the strata, so as to make the wall of hole smooth and ensure the good quality of sealing up. (6) No staying long near hole top and high pressure tube. People without fixed duties are prohibited to go close in case of accidents. Testing data arrangement (1) Calculation of pressure loss in the high water-pressure test Grouting section is served as the working tube for this drilling-hole water-pressure test, with the same inner diameters of 75 mm.in this water-pressure test, water column pressure shall be considered because that both the testing device and water source are not at the same elevated height(height difference is 15 m) as those of testing section. P S =ρgh=0.15 MPa (2) Data compilation 35 groups of data are acquired in this test. After analyzing, checking and synthetically considering the influence that grouting will do to pressure water test and after deducting the pressure loss, respectively third group data from all the five groups of data from every data stage is shown in table 1: Table 1 Data sheet of packer test Pressure(MPa) 0.00 0.85 1.85 2.85 3.85 2.85 1.85 0.85 0.00 Flow rate(l/min) 0.00 18.77 38.52 58.83 77.36 58.63 38.09 19.48 0.00 P-Q curve for high pressure water test was drawn as fig.4: Fig.4 Curve chart of flow rate and pressure for high pressure pressure water test Permeability analysis (1) Permeable rate Length of testing section is 8m.Permeable rate is calculated by taking the pressure value (P4) and the flow value (Q4)of the max pressure stage (the 4th stage)⑴, calculated permeable rate of the testing section was 2.51Lu. q Q 4 = (1) LP4 Where, q permeable rate of the testing section Lu; L length of testing section, 8 m; Q 4 calculated flow amount of the 4th stage, 77.36 L/min; P 4 testing pressure of the 4th stage, 3.85 MPa. Two significant figures are taken for permeable rate of the testing section. (2) Osmotic coefficient 591

According to the Drilling Pressure Water Test Procedures of Water Resources and Hydropower Engineering, on condition that permeable rate is low (less than 10Lu), data of the max pressure stage is taken as osmotic coefficient in the pressure water section in the rock body of the crevices and calculated as per equation (2). The calculated osmotic coefficient is 3.1 10-2 m/d. Q L K = ln (2) 2πHL Where, K osmotic coefficient of rock body (m/d); H testing waterhead (385 m); Q press-in flow amount(111.4 m 3 /d); L length of testing section (8 m); r 0 radius of the drilling hole (0.0375 m). r 0 Results analysis for the high pressure water test From P-Q curves of this high pressure water test, we can see that, boosting curve is a straight line going through the original point, the depressurizing curve nearly overlaps with the boosting curve(under the same pressure while boosting or depressurizing, they can be identified as almost overlapped if the absolute difference of the flow rate is less than 1L/min ). It works out that in the whole pressure water test, permeable state of the testing fine-grained sandstone section is laminar flow, and generally there is no difference in the crevices; according to the synthetic analysis of permeable rate and osmotic coefficient that the permeable rate of this rock body shall be classified as low permeable rate with good integrity of the rock body in the fine-grained sandstone. Conclusion According to the seismic exploration data, ground drilling and underground drilling data, dip angle of F16 fault is further verified at around 70,with a fall ranging from 30 to 150 m; permeable rates are respectively 0.8333 m/d, 0.9562 m/d, 1.0554 m/d according to the pumping test for the Bu 22 drilled holes on the ground. Permeable rate of the testing section is 2.51Lu through pressure water test, while osmotic coefficient of the testing section is 3.1 10-2 m/d, according to the synthetic analysis of permeable rate and osmotic coefficient that the permeable rate of this rock body shall be classified as low permeable rate with good integrity of the rock body in the fine-grained sandstone. Hydrogeological parameters such as permeable rate and osmotic coefficient of F16 fault provide key basis for setting up anti-coal pillars of F16 fault in a reasonable way. References Fan B, Luo PP (2010) Research status and outlook of testing theory in pressure water test of drilling holes. Coal engineering (1) 592