Triple Play: From De Morgan to Stirling To Euler to Maclaurin to Stirling

Similar documents
STIRLING'S 1 FORMULA AND ITS APPLICATION

Chapter 2 Infinite Series Page 1 of 11. Chapter 2 : Infinite Series

1985 AP Calculus BC: Section I

The Matrix Exponential

The Matrix Exponential

On the approximation of the constant of Napier

Statistics 3858 : Likelihood Ratio for Exponential Distribution

z 1+ 3 z = Π n =1 z f() z = n e - z = ( 1-z) e z e n z z 1- n = ( 1-z/2) 1+ 2n z e 2n e n -1 ( 1-z )/2 e 2n-1 1-2n -1 1 () z

Thomas J. Osler. 1. INTRODUCTION. This paper gives another proof for the remarkable simple

Discrete Fourier Transform (DFT)

Option 3. b) xe dx = and therefore the series is convergent. 12 a) Divergent b) Convergent Proof 15 For. p = 1 1so the series diverges.

Restricted Factorial And A Remark On The Reduced Residue Classes

A Simple Proof that e is Irrational

MONTGOMERY COLLEGE Department of Mathematics Rockville Campus. 6x dx a. b. cos 2x dx ( ) 7. arctan x dx e. cos 2x dx. 2 cos3x dx

1973 AP Calculus BC: Section I

SECTION where P (cos θ, sin θ) and Q(cos θ, sin θ) are polynomials in cos θ and sin θ, provided Q is never equal to zero.

Differential Equations

Brief Introduction to Statistical Mechanics

Chapter 10. The singular integral Introducing S(n) and J(n)

A Propagating Wave Packet Group Velocity Dispersion

Time : 1 hr. Test Paper 08 Date 04/01/15 Batch - R Marks : 120

SOME IDENTITIES FOR THE GENERALIZED POLY-GENOCCHI POLYNOMIALS WITH THE PARAMETERS A, B AND C

On a problem of J. de Graaf connected with algebras of unbounded operators de Bruijn, N.G.

PURE MATHEMATICS A-LEVEL PAPER 1

07 - SEQUENCES AND SERIES Page 1 ( Answers at he end of all questions ) b, z = n

BINOMIAL COEFFICIENTS INVOLVING INFINITE POWERS OF PRIMES. 1. Statement of results

Probability & Statistics,

H2 Mathematics Arithmetic & Geometric Series ( )

Cramér-Rao Inequality: Let f(x; θ) be a probability density function with continuous parameter

Derangements and Applications

For more important questions visit :

On the irreducibility of some polynomials in two variables

Hardy-Littlewood Conjecture and Exceptional real Zero. JinHua Fei. ChangLing Company of Electronic Technology Baoji Shannxi P.R.

PROOF OF FIRST STANDARD FORM OF NONELEMENTARY FUNCTIONS

u x v x dx u x v x v x u x dx d u x v x u x v x dx u x v x dx Integration by Parts Formula

Chapter Five. More Dimensions. is simply the set of all ordered n-tuples of real numbers x = ( x 1

Deift/Zhou Steepest descent, Part I

EEO 401 Digital Signal Processing Prof. Mark Fowler

That is, we start with a general matrix: And end with a simpler matrix:

Worksheet: Taylor Series, Lagrange Error Bound ilearnmath.net

Differentiation of Exponential Functions

Quasi-Classical States of the Simple Harmonic Oscillator

Calculus II (MAC )

A. Limits and Horizontal Asymptotes ( ) f x f x. f x. x "±# ( ).

They must have different numbers of electrons orbiting their nuclei. They must have the same number of neutrons in their nuclei.

DISTRIBUTION OF DIFFERENCE BETWEEN INVERSES OF CONSECUTIVE INTEGERS MODULO P

Recall that by Theorems 10.3 and 10.4 together provide us the estimate o(n2 ), S(q) q 9, q=1

INTEGRATION BY PARTS

Chapter Taylor Theorem Revisited

10. Limits involving infinity

Note If the candidate believes that e x = 0 solves to x = 0 or gives an extra solution of x = 0, then withhold the final accuracy mark.

1973 AP Calculus AB: Section I

+ x. x 2x. 12. dx. 24. dx + 1)

SCHUR S THEOREM REU SUMMER 2005

An Application of Hardy-Littlewood Conjecture. JinHua Fei. ChangLing Company of Electronic Technology Baoji Shannxi P.R.China

Abstract Interpretation: concrete and abstract semantics

NEW VERSION OF SZEGED INDEX AND ITS COMPUTATION FOR SOME NANOTUBES

UNTYPED LAMBDA CALCULUS (II)

(Upside-Down o Direct Rotation) β - Numbers

Lecture 37 (Schrödinger Equation) Physics Spring 2018 Douglas Fields

NET/JRF, GATE, IIT JAM, JEST, TIFR

Taylor and Maclaurin Series

Addition of angular momentum

Chapter (8) Estimation and Confedence Intervals Examples

Random Process Part 1

Gradebook & Midterm & Office Hours

Engineering 323 Beautiful HW #13 Page 1 of 6 Brown Problem 5-12

LINEAR DELAY DIFFERENTIAL EQUATION WITH A POSITIVE AND A NEGATIVE TERM

2008 AP Calculus BC Multiple Choice Exam

Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods

Mathematics 1110H Calculus I: Limits, derivatives, and Integrals Trent University, Summer 2018 Solutions to the Actual Final Examination

UNIT 2: MATHEMATICAL ENVIRONMENT

Session : Plasmas in Equilibrium

NEW APPLICATIONS OF THE ABEL-LIOUVILLE FORMULA

Course: INS335 R - DEMOCRATIZATION Responsible Faculty: Kanet, Roger E --- Survey Comparisons --- Responses Individual INS All. Med.

First order differential equation Linear equation; Method of integrating factors

GEOMETRICAL PHENOMENA IN THE PHYSICS OF SUBATOMIC PARTICLES. Eduard N. Klenov* Rostov-on-Don, Russia

Physics 116A Solutions to Homework Set #9 Winter 2012

10. Joint Moments and Joint Characteristic Functions

Ch. 24 Molecular Reaction Dynamics 1. Collision Theory

y = 2xe x + x 2 e x at (0, 3). solution: Since y is implicitly related to x we have to use implicit differentiation: 3 6y = 0 y = 1 2 x ln(b) ln(b)

Fooling Newton s Method a) Find a formula for the Newton sequence, and verify that it converges to a nonzero of f. A Stirling-like Inequality

( A) ( B) ( C) ( D) ( E)

EXST Regression Techniques Page 1

Partition Functions and Ideal Gases

INCOMPLETE KLOOSTERMAN SUMS AND MULTIPLICATIVE INVERSES IN SHORT INTERVALS. xy 1 (mod p), (x, y) I (j)

Law of large numbers

5.1 The Nuclear Atom

Computing and Communications -- Network Coding

EECE 301 Signals & Systems Prof. Mark Fowler

Chapter 11.00C Physical Problem for Fast Fourier Transform Civil Engineering

Estimation of apparent fraction defective: A mathematical approach

The van der Waals interaction 1 D. E. Soper 2 University of Oregon 20 April 2012

Probability and Stochastic Processes: A Friendly Introduction for Electrical and Computer Engineers Roy D. Yates and David J.

Linear Algebra Existence of the determinant. Expansion according to a row.

Solution: APPM 1360 Final (150 pts) Spring (60 pts total) The following parts are not related, justify your answers:

Some remarks on Kurepa s left factorial

ON RIGHT(LEFT) DUO PO-SEMIGROUPS. S. K. Lee and K. Y. Park

Slide 1. Slide 2. Slide 3 DIGITAL SIGNAL PROCESSING CLASSIFICATION OF SIGNALS

Announce. ECE 2026 Summer LECTURE OBJECTIVES READING. LECTURE #3 Complex View of Sinusoids May 21, Complex Number Review

Transcription:

Tripl Play: From D Morga to Stirlig To Eulr to Maclauri to Stirlig Augustus D Morga (186-1871) was a sigificat Victoria Mathmaticia who mad cotributios to Mathmatics History, Mathmatical Rcratios, Mathmatical Logic, Calculus, ad Probability ad Statistics. H was a ispirig Mathmatics profssor who iflucd may of his studts to joi th profssio. Thr hav b a umbr of articls supportig his choic as th bst Mathmatics profssor of th 19 th Ctury (A. Ric, What maks a grat mathmatics tachr? Th Cas of Augustus D Morga, Amr. Math. Mothly 16 (1999), pp. 534-55). O of D Morga s sigificat books was his Essay o Probabilitis ad o thir Applicatio to Lif Cotigcis ad Isurac Offics (Logma, Brow, ad Gr, Lodo, 1838). Th itt of th book was to mak Probability Thory accssibl to studts who o mathmatical traiig byod arithmtic. Thus, whil D Morga givs a logical prstatio, h avoids highr lvl mathmatics, ad sticks to a algorithmic, computatioal approach. Bcaus factorials of whol umbrs play a importat rol i Probability Thory, ad wr difficult to comput i th 19 th Ctury for larg whol umbrs, D Morga itroducs th followig algorithm (pp. 15-16) to approximat!, whr is a whol umbr. Not that [] i D Morga s otatio mas factorial.

I wodrd why his algorithm for! workd. That ld m to a Itrmdiat Algbra/Collg Algbra ivstigatio of th algorithm, which ld to Stirlig s Formula, which approximats!. Havig rctly taught Calculus II ad Calculus III at my collg, I wodrd why Stirlig s Formula so closly approximatd!. That i tur ld to th Gamma Fuctio (sigificatly dvlopd by Eulr), a proof by Mathmatical Iductio (D Morga itroducd th trm Mathmatical Iductio, ad mad th procss rigorous) of th Gamma Fuctio for!, ad a proof of Stirlig s Formula usig doubl itgrals i Polar Coordiats, ad Maclauri Sris. I th procss, I also lard som Mathmatics History ad discovrd som itrstig xrciss for Itrmdiat Algbra, Collg Algbra, Calculus II, ad Calculus III.

From D Morga to Stirlig Stirlig s approximatio of! was discovrd by Jams Stirlig (169-177), a Scottish Mathmaticia. Stirlig s approximatio stats that!~ Rfrig to D Morga s algorithm for!, ad otig that.434945 is a approximatio of log, ad.7981799 is a approximatio of log, w hav: (1) Tak th log of th umbr, ad subtract.434945: log log = log () Multiply by : log = log (3) Tak log ad add.7981799 = log + log = log (4) Tak half of th lattr rsult: 1 log log (5) Add th rsults of () ad (4): log + log = log (6) But this a approximatio of th log!, so!~, Stirlig s Formula. This would b a ic xrcis for Itrmdiat Algbra or Collg Algbra studts. Nxt, I wodrd why Stirlig s Formula approximatd!

From Stirlig to Eulr ad th Gamma Fuctio Bcaus th Gamma Fuctio givs! for whol umbrs, I xt lookd at th Gamma Fuctio; Eulr sigificatly cotributd to its dvlopmt. Th Gamma Fuctio provids a formula for th factorial of ay complx umbr with a positiv ral part. I my cas, I was itrstd i th factorial of whol umbrs. So, I sought a iductiv proof of th Gamma Fuctio for whol umbrs, a proof that could b usd i Calculus II. Th Gamma Fuctio stats for whol umbrs : x! x dx To iductivly prov that it is tru for whol umbrs: (1) Vrify it is tru for =.! =1 ad () Assum k! = k x x dx (3) Th (k+1)! should qual u = k 1 x ad dv = x dx k1 x x dx w gt x x x dx = dx =1. Usig Itgratio by Parts with k1 x x dx = k1 x x + ( 1) k x k x dx ( k 1) k! ( k 1)! whr k1 x x = by L Hospital s Rul. So, havig faith i th Gamma Fuctio as accuratly productig! for whol umbrs, I watd to prov that Stirlig s formula was a approximatio of th Gamma Fuctio, ad thus a approximatio of!. That ld m to a itrmdiat rsult usig Calculus III ad polar substitutio that I dd bfor I stablishd that Stirlig s formula approximatd th Gamma Fuctio.

A Itrmdiat Rsult Bfor I could go us th Maclauri Sris o th Gamma Fuctio, I had to stablish a itrmdiat rsult: x dx = Bcaus f(x) = x is a positiv v fuctio, whr is a whol umbr, Lt I = x dx ad A= 1 x I = dx. Th A = x x dx dx which by Fubii s Thorm ca b rwritt A = x y dx dy = x y dxdy. Usig polar substitutio ( x y r ad dxdy rdrd ) w gt A = r rdrd, whr th limit o is to bcaus w ar i Quadrat 1. r Evaluatig this doubl itgral with u substitutio ( u ), w gt A = or A =. Sic I = A = 4 =. This would b a good xrcis for Calculus III studts.

From th Gamma Fuctio (Eulr) to Maclauri (which lads us back to Stirlig) My goal was ow to show that Stirlig s Formula is a approximatio of!, ad thrfor a approximatio of th Gamma Fuctio. To stablish this, I did th followig: x (1)! = x dx by th Gamma Fuctio whr is a whol umbr. () Lt u = (x-) or x= (u+). Also du = dx. Substitutig, w gt (3) u u u u u u 1 du 1 du 1 du u (4) Look at l 1 = l u 1. u (5) Th first two trms of th Maclauri Sris for l 1 = u u u u (6) u = u ad (7) Substitutig th Maclauri Sris approximatio back ito (3) w gt (as ) (8)! ~ u u u u du du = by th Itrmdiat Rsult which taks us back to Stirlig s Formula., This would b a good xrcis for Calculus II studts.

A fial ivstigatio As, how closly dos Stirlig s Formula approximat!. O way to look at this is to look at lim. Bcaus of!, it would b impossibl to apply L Hospital s Rul.! Th radr is ivitd to tackl th problm o thir ow. Howvr, usig Scitific Notbook, lim! = 1, idicatig that as icrass, Stirlig s Formula bcoms!. Coclusio I was itrstd i radig D Morga s work o probability (a first ditio I just addd to my atiquaria math book collctio) to gt a historical prspctiv o th subjct. Who would imagi that i so doig, I would d up dvlopig richmt xrciss for classs from Itrmdiat Algbra through Calculus III, ad larig mor Mathmatics History alog th way.