Reserves measures have an economic component eg. what could be extracted at current prices?

Similar documents
Seminar 4: Hotelling 2

3.1.3 INTRODUCTION TO DYNAMIC OPTIMIZATION: DISCRETE TIME PROBLEMS. A. The Hamiltonian and First-Order Conditions in a Finite Time Horizon

Macroeconomic Theory Ph.D. Qualifying Examination Fall 2005 ANSWER EACH PART IN A SEPARATE BLUE BOOK. PART ONE: ANSWER IN BOOK 1 WEIGHT 1/3

ANSWERS TO EVEN NUMBERED EXERCISES IN CHAPTER 6 SECTION 6.1: LIFE CYCLE CONSUMPTION AND WEALTH T 1. . Let ct. ) is a strictly concave function of c

This document was generated at 1:04 PM, 09/10/13 Copyright 2013 Richard T. Woodward. 4. End points and transversality conditions AGEC

Essential Microeconomics : OPTIMAL CONTROL 1. Consider the following class of optimization problems

Solutions Problem Set 3 Macro II (14.452)

This document was generated at 7:34 PM, 07/27/09 Copyright 2009 Richard T. Woodward

Midterm Exam. Macroeconomic Theory (ECON 8105) Larry Jones. Fall September 27th, Question 1: (55 points)

E β t log (C t ) + M t M t 1. = Y t + B t 1 P t. B t 0 (3) v t = P tc t M t Question 1. Find the FOC s for an optimum in the agent s problem.

The Brock-Mirman Stochastic Growth Model

Appendix 14.1 The optimal control problem and its solution using

BU Macro BU Macro Fall 2008, Lecture 4

FINM 6900 Finance Theory

Economics 8105 Macroeconomic Theory Recitation 6

Introduction to choice over time

RANDOM LAGRANGE MULTIPLIERS AND TRANSVERSALITY

1. An introduction to dynamic optimization -- Optimal Control and Dynamic Programming AGEC

SZG Macro 2011 Lecture 3: Dynamic Programming. SZG macro 2011 lecture 3 1

1. Consider a pure-exchange economy with stochastic endowments. The state of the economy

Lecture 4 Notes (Little s Theorem)

Cooperative Ph.D. Program in School of Economic Sciences and Finance QUALIFYING EXAMINATION IN MACROECONOMICS. August 8, :45 a.m. to 1:00 p.m.

Problem Set on Differential Equations

This document was generated at 5:08 PM, 09/24/13 Copyright 2013 Richard T. Woodward

Seminar 5 Sustainability

IMPLICIT AND INVERSE FUNCTION THEOREMS PAUL SCHRIMPF 1 OCTOBER 25, 2013

Lecture Notes 5: Investment

Lecture Notes 3: Quantitative Analysis in DSGE Models: New Keynesian Model

Examples of Dynamic Programming Problems

PROOF FOR A CASE WHERE DISCOUNTING ADVANCES THE DOOMSDAY. T. C. Koopmans

T. J. HOLMES AND T. J. KEHOE INTERNATIONAL TRADE AND PAYMENTS THEORY FALL 2011 EXAMINATION

The general Solow model

1 Consumption and Risky Assets

The Brock-Mirman Stochastic Growth Model

Introduction D P. r = constant discount rate, g = Gordon Model (1962): constant dividend growth rate.

Problem 1 / 25 Problem 2 / 20 Problem 3 / 10 Problem 4 / 15 Problem 5 / 30 TOTAL / 100

1. An introduction to dynamic optimization -- Optimal Control and Dynamic Programming AGEC

THE BELLMAN PRINCIPLE OF OPTIMALITY

T L. t=1. Proof of Lemma 1. Using the marginal cost accounting in Equation(4) and standard arguments. t )+Π RB. t )+K 1(Q RB

Problem Set #3: AK models

Graduate Macro Theory II: Notes on Neoclassical Growth Model

Announcements: Warm-up Exercise:

EXERCISES FOR SECTION 1.5

Linear Response Theory: The connection between QFT and experiments

Problem set 3: Endogenous Innovation - Solutions

= ( ) ) or a system of differential equations with continuous parametrization (T = R

CENTRALIZED VERSUS DECENTRALIZED PRODUCTION PLANNING IN SUPPLY CHAINS

HOTELLING LOCATION MODEL

This document was generated at 4:25 PM, 03/29/18 Copyright 2018 Richard T. Woodward

Intermediate Macro In-Class Problems

( ) a system of differential equations with continuous parametrization ( T = R + These look like, respectively:

Lars Nesheim. 17 January Last lecture solved the consumer choice problem.

CHAPTER 12 DIRECT CURRENT CIRCUITS

1 Answers to Final Exam, ECN 200E, Spring

Optima and Equilibria for Traffic Flow on a Network

Final Exam. Tuesday, December hours

Explaining Total Factor Productivity. Ulrich Kohli University of Geneva December 2015

( ) (, ) F K L = F, Y K N N N N. 8. Economic growth 8.1. Production function: Capital as production factor

Solutions from Chapter 9.1 and 9.2

Inventory Analysis and Management. Multi-Period Stochastic Models: Optimality of (s, S) Policy for K-Convex Objective Functions

State-Space Models. Initialization, Estimation and Smoothing of the Kalman Filter

15.023J / J / ESD.128J Global Climate Change: Economics, Science, and Policy Spring 2008

COMPETITIVE GROWTH MODEL

Energy Storage Benchmark Problems

MATH 4330/5330, Fourier Analysis Section 6, Proof of Fourier s Theorem for Pointwise Convergence

Properties of Autocorrelated Processes Economics 30331

Policy regimes Theory

Reading from Young & Freedman: For this topic, read sections 25.4 & 25.5, the introduction to chapter 26 and sections 26.1 to 26.2 & 26.4.

Lecture 20: Riccati Equations and Least Squares Feedback Control

Mathematical Foundations -1- Choice over Time. Choice over time. A. The model 2. B. Analysis of period 1 and period 2 3

O Q L N. Discrete-Time Stochastic Dynamic Programming. I. Notation and basic assumptions. ε t : a px1 random vector of disturbances at time t.

Decomposing Value Added Growth Over Sectors into Explanatory Factors

V L. DT s D T s t. Figure 1: Buck-boost converter: inductor current i(t) in the continuous conduction mode.

2. Nonlinear Conservation Law Equations

Vehicle Arrival Models : Headway

Inventory Control of Perishable Items in a Two-Echelon Supply Chain

Final Spring 2007

Chapter 2. First Order Scalar Equations

Full file at

Problem Set 5. Graduate Macro II, Spring 2017 The University of Notre Dame Professor Sims

Y 0.4Y 0.45Y Y to a proper ARMA specification.

Econ107 Applied Econometrics Topic 7: Multicollinearity (Studenmund, Chapter 8)

Physics 235 Chapter 2. Chapter 2 Newtonian Mechanics Single Particle

Suggested Solutions to Assignment 4 (REQUIRED) Submisson Deadline and Location: March 27 in Class

Math 333 Problem Set #2 Solution 14 February 2003

OBJECTIVES OF TIME SERIES ANALYSIS

Learning a Class from Examples. Training set X. Class C 1. Class C of a family car. Output: Input representation: x 1 : price, x 2 : engine power

Economics 6130 Cornell University Fall 2016 Macroeconomics, I - Part 2

Introduction to DSGE modelling. Nicola Viegi. University of Pretoria

Hydropower Economics: An Overview

Modal identification of structures from roving input data by means of maximum likelihood estimation of the state space model

IB Physics Kinematics Worksheet

Basic Circuit Elements Professor J R Lucas November 2001

Learning a Class from Examples. Training set X. Class C 1. Class C of a family car. Output: Input representation: x 1 : price, x 2 : engine power

Predator - Prey Model Trajectories and the nonlinear conservation law

Online Convex Optimization Example And Follow-The-Leader

5.1 - Logarithms and Their Properties

Phys1112: DC and RC circuits

2.1: What is physics? Ch02: Motion along a straight line. 2.2: Motion. 2.3: Position, Displacement, Distance

Ground Rules. PC1221 Fundamentals of Physics I. Kinematics. Position. Lectures 3 and 4 Motion in One Dimension. A/Prof Tay Seng Chuan

Transcription:

3.2 Non-renewable esources A. Are socks of non-renewable resources fixed? eserves measures have an economic componen eg. wha could be exraced a curren prices? - Locaion and quaniies of reserves of resources like oil and gas are no known and can be expanded wih increased exploraion effor. - Base resource: he mass ha is hough o exis in he earh s crus - esource poenial: Tha which could be exraced given curren and expeced echnologies - World reserve base: esimaes of he upper bounds of resource socks (including reserves no ye discovered) ha are economically recoverable under reasonable expecaions of fuure prices, coss, and echnological possibiliies - eserves: quaniies ha are economically recoverable given presen coss and prices See Perman, p 59. Also he BP Saisical eview of World Energy, 24, has useful informaion on reserves versus producion for various non-renewable energy sources. B. A wo period model Two periods: period and period 1 A fixed sock of known size of a non-renewable resource Iniial sock a period is S. () is exraced in period. Inverse demand funcion: P = a b Demand goes o zero a price a. esource is eiher non-essenial or i possesses a subsiue. Ec 655, 3.2 Nonrenewable resources 1

P a-b Toal benefi o consumers from consuming : B( ) = ( a b) d = a b 2 2 (2.1) Exracions coss: C = c (2.2) Toal ne social benefi: NSB = B C (2.3) b NSB( ) = a c (2.4) 2 2 Assume he social uiliy in each period is equal o he ne social benefis in each period (a srong assumpion). Opimizaion problem: Ec 655, 3.2 Nonrenewable resources 2

MaxW 1 = + (2.5) 1 ρ, + 1 NSB NSB subjec o: + 1 = S (2.6) Se up he Lagrangian and opimize wih respec o and 1. Try his yourselves. We ge a wo period version of Hoelling s rule: ρ = ( P1 c) ( P c) ( P c) (2.7) An efficien exracion profile requires he ne price of he resource o grow a he social discoun rae. The opimal exracion program also requires ha he wo gross prices, P and P 1, saisfy he following: P = a b P = a b 1 1 + = S 1 ( P c)(1 ρ) = ( P c) 1 (2.8) These condiions will uniquely define he wo prices and quaniies of resources o be exraced for welfare maximizaion. Try problem 1 in Perman, p. 533. Ec 655, 3.2 Nonrenewable resources 3

C. A non-renewable muli-period resource model Noe on ransversaliy condiions wih a non-negaiviy consrain on he sock: T free; x( T) x min (i) x*( T) > xmin hen x(t) is free and λ(t)= or λ(t)=f (x(t)) (F is scrap value). O (ii) x*(t)=x min, hen x(t) is fixed and λ(t) is free. In summary: λ( T ), xt ( ) xmin, λ( T)[ x( T) x ] = min Also noe ha for infinie horizon problems for he ransversaliy condiions, we ake he limi as T. Ec 655, 3.2 Nonrenewable resources 4

Assume: - a finie sock of he resource - a social planner - i coss nohing o exrac he resource - demand funcions: () = D( P()) (2.1) 1 ( ) = ( ( )) inverse demand funcion P D Flow of social welfare a a poin in ime: Objecive: Subjec o: s= () W () = Psds ( ) (2.11) T s= ρ max J= e W( ) d T () ρ = e p() s ds d S = () S() = S S (), () Find he curren valued Hamilonian. We use λ o denoe he curren valued cosae variable in his secion. (2.12) (2.13) FOC s: () (2.14) H = P() s ds+ λ( ()) Ec 655, 3.2 Nonrenewable resources 5

H = P ( ( )) λ( ) = H λ λρ = = S λ = λρ (2.15) (2.16) Solving Equaion (2.16): λ() λ() e ρ = (2.17) From Equaion (2.15), This is Hoelling s rule again. Transversaliy condiions: P() = P() e ρ (2.18) (2.19) P() = ρp() λ ( T) S( T) = (2.2) HT ( ) = (2.21) We can conclude ha S*(T)=. I is opimal o exhaus he resource. Proof by conradicion: Suppose S*(T)>. Then holding T consan, we could have increased consumpion *(T), and his would make social welfare higher since here are no cocs o consumpion. Thus i canno be opimal o leave S*(T)>. Hence S*(T)=. To find he opimal T, we wan he Hamilonian a T o be exacly zero: Ec 655, 3.2 Nonrenewable resources 6

HT ( ) = T ( ) Psds () λ( TT ) ( ) = (2.22) Using he FOC s we can wrie: T ( ) P( sds ) = PT ( ) T ( ) (2.23) Wha happens o P as he resource is exhaused? Two possibiliies: P Case I P() Ec 655, 3.2 Nonrenewable resources 7

P Case II P() lim P( ) Case I: = ; *(T)=. If we are o finish wih a zero rae of exracion, price mus rise infiniely high. This will ake an infinie amoun of ime. Our opimal ime horizon is T. lim P( ) K Case II: = where K is a choke price. (T)=, P*(T)=K. There will be a finie erminal ime. A backsop echnology creaes a ceiling on he price of he non-renewable resource. Case I: T* P( T) = P() e P() = P() e S*( T) = ρt ρ (2.24) () = S (2.25) Ec 655, 3.2 Nonrenewable resources 8

Equaion (2.25) follows because oal consumpion mus equal he sock of he resource. This allows us o solve for a paricular P()*. How? We know ()=D(P(T))=D(P()e ρ ). Subsiue ino Equaion (2.25) gives: ρ DP ( () e ) d= S (2.26) This is one equaion in one unknown. I may be difficul o solve could be highly nonlinear. Case II: P( T) = K P() = P() e S*( T) = ρ (2.27) We don know T or p(). We can use he firs wo equaions of Equaion (2.27) o solve for P(). Then we solve for T* using: P() Ke ρt = (2.28) T () d= S (2.29) () = D( P()) P () = Ke ρ ( T ) ρ ( T ) () DKe ( ) = (2.3) We can subsiue for () in Equaion (2.29) and solve for T*. This gives us he ime o swich o he backsop echnology. Ec 655, 3.2 Nonrenewable resources 9

Example Suppose he inverse demand curve is: P Ke a = (2.31) Noe ha K is he choke price. P K U() = shaded area Ke -a Quaniy of resource exraced, Figure 15.2 A resource demand curve, and he oal uiliy from consuming a paricular quaniy of he resource. Solve for P*(), *(), T*, *(). Ec 655, 3.2 Nonrenewable resources 1

Figure 15.3 Ne price P P T =K Demand P P 45 T Time Area = S = oal resource sock T Time Ec 655, 3.2 Nonrenewable resources 11