I. HARTLE CHAPTER 8, PROBLEM 2 (8 POINTS) where here an overdot represents d/dλ, must satisfy the geodesic equation (see 3 on problem set 4)

Similar documents
PHZ 6607 Fall 2004 Homework #4, Due Friday, October 22, 2004

Physics 325: General Relativity Spring Final Review Problem Set

Problem 1, Lorentz transformations of electric and magnetic

+ dxk. dt 2. dt Γi km dxm. . Its equations of motion are second order differential equations. with intitial conditions

General Relativity and Differential

Appendix to Lecture 2

x α x β g α β = xα x β g αβ. (1.1)

Special and General Relativity (PHZ 4601/5606) Fall 2018 Classwork and Homework. Every exercise counts 10 points unless stated differently.

Write your CANDIDATE NUMBER clearly on each of the THREE answer books provided. Hand in THREE answer books even if they have not all been used.

=0 x i p j t + (pj v i )

Tutorial Exercises: Geometric Connections

The line element for the hyperbolic plane was given in problem 12, of chapter 8 in Hartle

Exact Solutions of the Einstein Equations

Georgia Tech PHYS 6124 Mathematical Methods of Physics I

Physics 236a assignment, Week 2:

Lecture: Lorentz Invariant Dynamics

Derivatives in General Relativity

General Relativity ASTR 2110 Sarazin. Einstein s Equation

Syllabus. May 3, Special relativity 1. 2 Differential geometry 3

2 General Relativity. 2.1 Curved 2D and 3D space

Mathematical Relativity, Spring 2017/18 Instituto Superior Técnico

The Geometry of Relativity

The Geometry of Relativity

Übungen zu RT2 SS (4) Show that (any) contraction of a (p, q) - tensor results in a (p 1, q 1) - tensor.

General Relativity and Cosmology Mock exam

Ask class: what is the Minkowski spacetime in spherical coordinates? ds 2 = dt 2 +dr 2 +r 2 (dθ 2 +sin 2 θdφ 2 ). (1)

Arc Length and Riemannian Metric Geometry

3 Parallel transport and geodesics

PHZ 6607 Fall 2004 Midterm exam, Due Monday, November 8.

3 The Friedmann-Robertson-Walker metric

PAPER 311 BLACK HOLES

University of Illinois at Chicago Department of Physics

The Klein-Gordon Equation Meets the Cauchy Horizon

A5682: Introduction to Cosmology Course Notes. 2. General Relativity

UNIVERSITY OF DUBLIN

Spacetime and 4 vectors

Third Year: General Relativity and Cosmology. 1 Problem Sheet 1 - Newtonian Gravity and the Equivalence Principle

General Birkhoff s Theorem

THEODORE VORONOV DIFFERENTIAL GEOMETRY. Spring 2009

MIT Course 8.033, Fall 2006, Relativistic Kinematics Max Tegmark Last revised October

Curved spacetime and general covariance

Einstein s Theory of Gravity. June 10, 2009

Tutorial General Relativity

2.1 The metric and and coordinate transformations

Tensors, and differential forms - Lecture 2

PHZ 6607 Special and General Relativity I Handout #1: The case for General Relativity

Einstein Toolkit Workshop. Joshua Faber Apr

Is there a magnification paradox in gravitational lensing?

MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Physics Department Physics 8.286: The Early Universe October 27, 2013 Prof. Alan Guth PROBLEM SET 6

General Relativity I

Solving the Geodesic Equation

arxiv: v2 [gr-qc] 27 Apr 2013

The Geometry of Relativity

Ph236 Homework 4 Solutions

Lagrangian for Central Potentials

Kerr black hole and rotating wormhole

Quantum Black Hole and Information. Lecture (1): Acceleration, Horizon, Black Hole

PHY6426/Fall 07: CLASSICAL MECHANICS HOMEWORK ASSIGNMENT #1 due by 9:35 a.m. Wed 09/05 Instructor: D. L. Maslov Rm.

The Motion of A Test Particle in the Gravitational Field of A Collapsing Shell

Geometry and Motion Selected answers to Sections A and C Dwight Barkley 2016

Chapter 4. The First Fundamental Form (Induced Metric)

Einstein s Equations. July 1, 2008

Frame Dragging Anomalies for Rotating Bodies

Part II. General Relativity. Year

The Gödel Engine (additional material): Derivation of the special solution to the geodesic equations

Marion and Thornton. Tyler Shendruk October 1, Hamilton s Principle - Lagrangian and Hamiltonian dynamics.

Gravitation: Special Relativity

A A + B. ra + A + 1. We now want to solve the Einstein equations in the following cases:

Physics 523, General Relativity Homework 7 Due Wednesday, 6 th December 2006

Chapter 2 General Relativity and Black Holes

Errata for Instructor s Solutions Manual for Gravity, An Introduction to Einstein s General Relativity 1st printing

Gravitational Lensing

Uniformity of the Universe

Accelerated Observers

On the Hawking Wormhole Horizon Entropy

Analytic Kerr Solution for Puncture Evolution

BOUNDARY STRESS TENSORS IN A TIME DEPENDENT SPACETIME

Solutions Exam FY3452 Gravitation and Cosmology fall 2017

Two dimensional oscillator and central forces

PHYM432 Relativity and Cosmology 6. Differential Geometry

arxiv: v1 [gr-qc] 3 Aug 2017

Physics 480/581. Homework No. 10 Solutions: due Friday, 19 October, 2018

The Apparent Universe

We begin our discussion of special relativity with a power point presentation, available on the website.

carroll/notes/ has a lot of good notes on GR and links to other pages. General Relativity Philosophy of general

Orbital Motion in Schwarzschild Geometry

Symmetries 2 - Rotations in Space

FRW cosmology: an application of Einstein s equations to universe. 1. The metric of a FRW cosmology is given by (without proof)

7 Curvilinear coordinates

Physics 351, Spring 2017, Homework #4. Due at start of class, Friday, February 10, 2017

Schwarschild Metric From Kepler s Law

Geometrized units. Specific energy and specific angular momentum

M3/4A16 Assessed Coursework 1 Darryl Holm Due in class Thursday November 6, 2008 #1 Eikonal equation from Fermat s principle

INTRODUCING VECTORS: THE OLD AND THE NEW! The concept of a metric can be introduced as a fairly simple generalization of Pythagoras s theorem.

Ocean Modeling - EAS Chapter 2. We model the ocean on a rotating planet

REVIEW PROBLEMS FOR QUIZ 2

2.3 Calculus of variations

Quasi-local mass and isometric embedding

Physics/Astronomy 226, Problem set 2, Due 1/27 Solutions

Physics 139: Problem Set 9 solutions

Transcription:

Physics 445 Solution for homework 5 Fall 2004 Cornell University 41 points) Steve Drasco 1 NOTE From here on, unless otherwise indicated we will use the same conventions as in the last two solutions: four-vectors v are denoted by an arrow, three-vectors v will be in bold, and we use units where c = 1. I. HARTLE CHAPTER 8, PROBLEM 2 8 POINTS) The line element for the surface of a two-sphere with radius a is ds 2 = a 2 dθ 2 + a 2 sin 2 θ dφ 2. 1.1) Extrema of the functional integral S[x µ λ)] = dλ g αβ [x µ λ)]ẋ α ẋ β = dλ Lx α, ẋ β ), 1.2) where here an overdot represents d/dλ, must satisfy the geodesic equation see 3 on problem set 4) ẍ α = Γ α βγẋ β ẋ γ, 1.3) and of course, the Euler-Lagrange equation Using the line element 1.1) we have L,α = ) 2s 2 φ2 sin θ cos θ, 0, L,α = d ) L dτ ẋ α. 1.4) ) d L dτ ẋ α = 2a 2 θ, φ sin 2 θ + 2 φ θ ) sin θ cos θ. 1.5) Substituting into the Euler-Lagrange equation 1.4) gives the equations of motion θ = sin θ cos θ φ 2, φ = 2 cot θ θ φ. 1.6) Comparing these with the geodesic equation 1.3) gives Γ θ φφ = sin θ cos θ, Γ φ θφ = Γφ φθ = cot θ, Γθ θφ = Γ θ φθ = Γ θ θθ = Γ φ θθ = Γφ φφ = 0. 1.7) By symmetry, the coordinates can always be chosen so that any great circle runs along the equator and is described by θ = π/2, θ = 0, and φ = constant. This satisfies the equations of motion 1.6), which means that any great circle is a geodesic. II. HARTLE CHAPTER 8, PROBLEM 4 10 POINTS) For this problem, we will use the line element ds 2 = [1 Ω 2 x 2 + y 2 )]dt 2 + 2Ωydx xdy)dt + dx 2 + dy 2 + dz 2. 2.1)

2 Introduce new coordinates x = r sin θ cos φ, y = r sin θ sin φ, z = r cos θ. 2.2) Then by comparison to the usual Cartesian and spherical coordinates, we have and by direct substitution Now compute the differentials to see that the off diagonal term in the line element is dx 2 + dy 2 + dz 2 = dr 2 + r 2 dθ 2 + r 2 sin 2 θ dφ 2, 2.3) Ω 2 x 2 + y 2 ) dt 2 = Ω 2 r 2 sin 2 θ dt 2. 2.4) dx = sin θ cos φ dr + r cos θ cos φ dθ r sin θ sin φ dφ 2.5) dy = sin θ sin φ dr + r cos θ sin φ dθ + r sin θ cos φ dφ, 2.6) Substitution of Eqs. 2.3), 2.4), and 2.7) into the line element 2.1) gives 2Ωydx xdy)dt = 2Ωr 2 sin 2 θ dφ dt. 2.7) ds 2 = dt 2 + dr 2 + r 2 dθ 2 + r 2 sin 2 θ dφ 2 + Ω 2 r 2 sin 2 θ dt 2 2Ωr 2 sin 2 θ dφ dt. 2.8) If we define ϕ = φ Ωt, we can rewrite this as the usual flat metric in spherical coordinates with φ ϕ ds 2 = dt 2 + dr 2 + r 2 dθ 2 + r 2 sin 2 θ dϕ 2. 2.9) Let the coordinates x α be Cartesian coordinates constructed from t, r, θ, ϕ) t = t, x = r sin θ cos ϕ, y = r sin θ sin ϕ, z = r cos θ = z. 2.10) The result 2.9) from A means that ds 2 = dt ) 2 + dx ) 2 + dy ) 2 + dz ) 2, 2.11) and that the x coordinates are related to the x a coordinates where a and a can be either 1 or 2) by where R b is a rotation matrix x = R b x b, 2.12) ) cos Ωt sin Ωt Rb =, 2.13) sin Ωt cos Ωt corresponding to a rotation angle of Ωt in φ about the z-axis. The geodesic equations in these coordinates must be ẍ α = 0, where an overdot represents d/dτ. Using Eq. 2.12) we can write this in terms of the rotating coordinates x α. The t and z components are unchanged ẗ = 0, z = 0, which also implies that ṫ is a constant. The x b components are changed to Now contract with the inverse/transpose of the rotation matrix to find Rb ẍ b + 2Ṙ b ẋ b + R b x b = 0. 2.14) ẍ a = 2Ra a Ṙ b ẋ b Ra a R b x b. 2.15)

Since ṫ is constant, we can easily convert the proper time derivatives of the rotation matrices into coordinate time derivatives ẍ a = 2ṫRa a drb dt Note that the rotation matrices have the properties ẋ b ṫ 2 Ra a d 2 Rb dt 2 xb. 2.16) 3 where ɛ a b is the Levi-Chivita matrix Ra a drb dt = Ωɛ a b, Ra a d 2 Rb dt 2 = Ω 2 δb a, 2.17) ɛ a b = ) 0 1 1 0 2.18) So the geodesic equations for the x α coordinates are ẗ = 0, ẍ = Ω 2 xṫ 2 + 2Ωẏṫ, ÿ = Ω 2 yṫ 2 2Ωẋṫ, z = 0. 2.19) In the non-relativistic limit ṫ 1, and the geodesic equations for x and y become C. ẗ = 0, ẍ = Ω 2 x + 2Ωẏ, ÿ = Ω 2 y 2Ωẋ, z = 0. 2.20) where an overdot represents d/dt = d/dτ, in this limit. The Coriolis acceleration is given by ẍ cor = 2Ω ẋ see your favorite classical Mechanics text). For rotation about the z-axis ẍ cor = 2Ωẏ, ÿ cor = 2Ωẋ. 2.21) The centrifugal acceleration is given by ẍ cen = Ω Ω x. For rotation about the z-axis, this gives ẍ cen = Ω 2 y, ÿ cen = Ω 2 x. 2.22) So we can rewrite the non-relativistic limit of the geodesic equation in the rotating x α frame 2.20) as ẗ = 0, ẍ = ẍ cor + ẍ cen, ÿ = ÿ cor + ÿ cen, z = 0. 2.23) III. HARTLE CHAPTER 8, PROBLEM 14 8 POINTS) In a material with index of refraction nx i ), light propagates at a speed ds/dt = 1/n, where ds 2 = dx 2 + dy 2 + dz 2. So the time T that it takes for light to travel along some path x i s) is given by T [x i s)] = dt = ds n[x i s)]. 3.1) Fermat s principle says that light follows a path which is an extremum of T [x i s)]. If we define a geometry with line element ds 2 Fermat = n2 ds 2, then these light paths will be geodesics since the geodesics are the extrema of dλ g Fermat ij dx i dx j dλ dλ = gij Fermat dx i dx j = ds Fermat = ds n[x i s)] = T [x i s)]. 3.2)

4 The metric for the line element ds 2 Fermat is g ij = n 2 δ ij, g ij = n 2 δ ij. 3.3) Recall, from II in the solutions to homework 4, that we can write the geodesic equation as ẍ i = 1 2 gij g kl,j 2g jk,l )ẋ k ẋ l = n 1 δ ij n,j δ kl 2n,l δ jk )ẋ k ẋ l, 3.4) We can rewrite this in usual 3-vector notation as ẍ = 1 n 2ẋx n) ]. n 3.5) IV. HARTLE CHAPTER 9, PROBLEM 1 5 POINTS) Using Schwarzschild coordinates, the line element is ds 2 = 1 2M r ) dt 2 + 1 2M r ) 1 dr 2 + r 2 dθ 2 + r 2 sin 2 θdφ 2. 4.1) Since the angular portion of the line element is the same as the line element for the two-sphere 1.1) with radius r, the area of any surface of constant r is the usual 4πr 2. Therefore the inner and outer surfaces of the shell, with areas 144πM 2 and 400πM 2, are located at radius r 1 = 6M and r 2 = 10M, respectively. The radial thickness of the shell is r2 r 1 dr 1 2M r ) 1/2 5 = 2M du 3 1 1 u) 1/2 4.64M. 4.2) V. RINDLER SPACETIME 10 POINTS) The line element in the Rindler spacetime is Solution prepared by Katrin Schenk ds 2 = x 2 dt 2 + dx 2 5.1) Let z α λ) be a geodesic, where λ is some affine parameter 1, and let v α = dz α /dλ = ṫ, ẋ), be a vector which is tangent to the geodesic an overdot will again represent d/dλ). We will make use of use the conserved quantity E associated with the Killing vector t, and also velocity normalization v 2 = V, where V is a constant. Note that we will not assume that V = ±1; for a general geodesic it can be arbitrary. [For spacelike or timelike geodesics it is conventional to rescale the affine parameter λ by redefining λ kλ, where k is a constant, in order to make d/dλ) 2 = ±1, but it is not necessary to do so.] The conserved quantities give As suggested, we will require the geodesic to obey the boundary conditions ṫ = Ex 2, 5.2) ẋ 2 = E 2 x 2 + V. 5.3) z α 0) = [t0), x0)] = 0, 1), 5.4) v α 0) = [ṫ0), ẋ0)] = α, β). 5.5) 1 This means that dλ/dτ is constant, for timelike geodesics, or that dλ/ds is constant for spacelike geodesics. These conditions can be derived by requiring that the geodesic equation has the same form when written in terms of λ, as it does when written in terms of τ or s.

5 Evaluating Eqs. 5.2) and 5.3) at λ = 0, then gives The solution to Eq. 5.3) which obeys the boundary conditions is given by E = α, V = β 2 α 2 5.6) xλ) = 1 + 2βλ + Vλ 2. 5.7) Using this in Eq. 5.2) and solving for t gives ) αλ tλ) = tanh 1. 5.8) 1 + βλ So at the point Q where λ = 1, we have x = 1 + 2β + V, ) α t = tanh 1. 1 + β 5.9) Using V = β 2 α 2 we can solve for α and β: α = x sinh t, β = x cosh t 1. 5.10) The validity of Eqs. 5.10) can be checked by substituting back into Eqs. 5.9). We now treat α, β as new coordinates defined by Eqs. 5.10), and we compute the metric in these new coordinates. Computing the differentials gives which, from Eq. 5.1), give dα = dx sinh t + xdt cosh t, dβ = dx cosh t + xdt sinh t, 5.11) ds 2 = dα 2 + dβ 2. 5.12)