Statistical Behaviors of Quantum Spectra in Superheavy Nuclei

Similar documents
Theoretical Study on Alpha-Decay Chains of

Density distributions of superheavy nuclei

Observables predicted by HF theory

The effect of the tensor force on the predicted stability of superheavy

Correlation between alpha-decay energies of superheavy nuclei

Relativistic versus Non Relativistic Mean Field Models in Comparison

Shape of Lambda Hypernuclei within the Relativistic Mean-Field Approach

Shell structure of superheavy elements

Nuclear Models Basic Concepts in Nuclear Theory. Joachim A. Maruhn

Lisheng Geng. Ground state properties of finite nuclei in the relativistic mean field model

Isospin and Symmetry Structure in 36 Ar

Some new developments in relativistic point-coupling models

Bound states of anti-nucleons in finite nuclei

Ground-state properties of some N=Z medium mass heavy nuclei. Keywords: Nuclear properties, neutron skin thickness, HFB method, RMF model, N=Z nuclei

Investigations on Nuclei near Z = 82 in Relativistic Mean Field Theory with FSUGold

Shape Coexistence and Band Termination in Doubly Magic Nucleus 40 Ca

RFSS: Lecture 8 Nuclear Force, Structure and Models Part 1 Readings: Nuclear Force Nuclear and Radiochemistry:

Alpha Decay of Superheavy Nuclei

Journey to Superheavy Valley

arxiv: v1 [nucl-th] 21 Aug 2007

Investigation of Nuclear Ground State Properties of Fuel Materials of 232 Th and 238 U Using Skyrme- Extended-Thomas-Fermi Approach Method

c E If photon Mass particle 8-1

Quantum Theory of Many-Particle Systems, Phys. 540

The Nuclear Many-Body Problem

Structure of Atomic Nuclei. Anthony W. Thomas

Fusion Barrier of Super-heavy Elements in a Generalized Liquid Drop Model

arxiv:nucl-th/ v1 27 Mar 2006

Quasifission and dynamical extra-push in heavy and superheavy elements synthesis

FIGURE 1. Excitation energy versus angular-momentum plot of the yrast structure of 32 S calculated with the Skyrme III interaction. Density distributi

Potential energy surfaces of superheavy nuclei

1 Introduction. 2 The hadronic many body problem

PAIRING PROPERTIES OF SYMMETRIC NUCLEAR MATTER IN RELATIVISTIC MEAN FIELD THEORY

Theory of neutron-rich nuclei and nuclear radii Witold Nazarewicz (with Paul-Gerhard Reinhard) PREX Workshop, JLab, August 17-19, 2008

Spectral Fluctuations in A=32 Nuclei Using the Framework of the Nuclear Shell Model

Magic Numbers of Ultraheavy Nuclei

Structure properties of medium and heavy exotic nuclei

Isospin symmetry breaking and the nuclear shell model

FISSION TIMES AND PAIRING PROPERTIES

Influence of Shell on Pre-scission Particle Emission of a Doubly Magic Nucleus 208 Pb

Correlations derived from modern nucleon-nucleon potentials

Transport studies of heavy ion collisions and antiproton-induced reactions on nuclei at FAIR energies

Superheavy Nuclei in the Relativistic Mean Field Theory

Superheavy nuclei: Decay and Stability

How to do C.C. calculations if there is only limited experimental information on intrinsic degrees of freedom?

arxiv:nucl-th/ v1 24 Nov 2004

Mean-field concept. (Ref: Isotope Science Facility at Michigan State University, MSUCL-1345, p. 41, Nov. 2006) 1/5/16 Volker Oberacker, Vanderbilt 1

Correction to Relativistic Mean Field binding energy and N p N n scheme

Microscopic Fusion Dynamics Based on TDHF

Brazilian Journal of Physics ISSN: Sociedade Brasileira de Física Brasil

Covariant density functional theory: The role of the pion

PHY492: Nuclear & Particle Physics. Lecture 6 Models of the Nucleus Liquid Drop, Fermi Gas, Shell

QUANTUM CHAOS IN NUCLEAR PHYSICS

WEAKLY BOUND NEUTRON RICH C ISOTOPES WITHIN RMF+BCS APPROACH

Stability Peninsulas at the Neutron Drip Line

Joint ICTP-IAEA Workshop on Nuclear Structure Decay Data: Theory and Evaluation August Introduction to Nuclear Physics - 1

Pairing Interaction in N=Z Nuclei with Half-filled High-j Shell

Isoscalar dipole mode in relativistic random phase approximation

Neutron Halo in Deformed Nuclei

QRPA Calculations of Charge Exchange Reactions and Weak Interaction Rates. N. Paar

Statistical analysis in nuclear DFT: central depression as example

Symmetry energy, masses and T=0 np-pairing

arxiv:nucl-th/ v1 27 Apr 2004

The tensor-kinetic field in nuclear collisions

Instead, the probability to find an electron is given by a 3D standing wave.

arxiv: v2 [nucl-th] 8 May 2014

DI-NEUTRON CORRELATIONS IN LOW-DENSITY NUCLEAR MATTER

E(5) and X(5) shape phase transitions within a Skyrme-Hartree-Fock + BCS approach

Relativistic point-coupling models for finite nuclei

The mere existence of superheavy elements has been a

Lifetime of Antibaryon Bound in Finite Nuclei

What did you learn in the last lecture?

Coexistence phenomena in neutron-rich A~100 nuclei within beyond-mean-field approach

arxiv: v1 [nucl-th] 16 Sep 2008

New T=1 effective interactions for the f 5/2 p 3/2 p 1/2 g 9/2 model space: Implications for valence-mirror symmetry and seniority isomers

Central density. Consider nuclear charge density. Frois & Papanicolas, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 37, 133 (1987) QMPT 540

TWO CENTER SHELL MODEL WITH WOODS-SAXON POTENTIALS

Self-Consistent Equation of State for Hot Dense Matter: A Work in Progress

INVESTIGATION OF THE EVEN-EVEN N=106 ISOTONIC CHAIN NUCLEI IN THE GEOMETRIC COLLECTIVE MODEL

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

Introduction to Theory of Mesoscopic Systems

Symmetry energy of dilute warm nuclear matter

arxiv:nucl-th/ v1 3 May 2006

K Nucleus Elastic Scattering and Momentum-Dependent Optical Potentials

Spin Cut-off Parameter of Nuclear Level Density and Effective Moment of Inertia

Physics Letters B 695 (2011) Contents lists available at ScienceDirect. Physics Letters B.

Pairing and ( 9 2 )n configuration in nuclei in the 208 Pb region

E. Fermi: Notes on Thermodynamics and Statistics (1953))

Nuclear Symmetry Energy in Relativistic Mean Field Theory. Abstract

Lecture 4: Nuclear Energy Generation

Theoretical Nuclear Physics

Evolution Of Shell Structure, Shapes & Collective Modes. Dario Vretenar

Energy Level Statistics of the U(5) and O(6) Symmetries in the Interacting Boson Model

Nuclear structure Anatoli Afanasjev Mississippi State University

Antimagnetic rotation in 108,110 In with tilted axis cranking relativistic mean-field approach *

Heavy Elements and Related New Phenomena

Mean field studies of odd mass nuclei and quasiparticle excitations. Luis M. Robledo Universidad Autónoma de Madrid Spain

The uncertainty quantification in covariant density functional theory.

Nuclear Landscape not fully known

Beyond mean-field study on collective vibrations and beta-decay

Introduction to Nuclear Science

Transcription:

Commun. Theor. Phys. (Beijing, China) 39 (2003) pp. 597 602 c International Academic Publishers Vol. 39, No. 5, May 15, 2003 Statistical Behaviors of Quantum Spectra in Superheavy Nuclei WU Xi-Zhen, 1,4 LI Zhu-Xia, 1,3,4 WANG Ning, 1 and J.A. Maruhn 2 1 China Institute of Atomic Energy, P.O. Box 275(18), Beijing 102413, China 2 Institut für Theoretische Physik der Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universität, Frankfurt am Main, Germany 3 Institute of Theoretical Physics, Academia Sinica, P.O. Box 2735, Beijing 100080, China 4 Center of Theoretical Nuclear Physics, National Laboratory of Lanzhou Heavy Ion Accelerator, Lanzhou 730000, China (Received October 21, 2002) Abstract From the point of view of the interplay between order and chaos, the most regular single-particle motion of neutrons has been found in the superheavy system with Z = 120 and N = 184 based on the Skyrme Hartree Fock model and in the system with Z = 120 and N = 172 based on the relativistic mean-field model. It has been shown that the statistical analysis of spectra can give valuable information about the stability of suprheavy systems. In addition it may yield deep insight into the single-particle motion in the mean field formed by the superheavy system. PACS numbers: 24.60.ky, 27.90.+b, 24.60.-k Key words: statistical properties of quantum spectra, Poisson distribution, superheavy systems 1 Introduction To predict the existence of shell-stabilized superheavy nuclei has been a strong motivation for heavy-ion physics. In the recent three decades with the rapid development of experimental facilities more and more new isotopes have been produced and the expected magic proton number Z = 114 seems to be in reach. [1,2] Superheavy elements are thus a topic of current interest and it is worth while to look at them using various theoretical approaches. The macroscopic-microscopic model was developed quite early. It is based on a generalized liquid-drop model that governs the bulk properties and a single-particle potential from which the shell correction is obtained. [3,4] An alternative macroscopic-microscopic approach is the self-consistent mean-field model. The most widely used self-consistent mean-field models in nuclear physics are the Skyrme Hartree Fock (SHF) [5] approach and the relativistic mean-field model (RMF). [6,7] Based on the above mean-field models one can calculate the shell corrections, and predict the location of expected magic superheavy nuclei. The shell correction resulting from the fluctuation of the energy levels very close to Fermi level provides us with information of shell closures. An alternative shell correction is provided by the statistical study of spectra. As is well known, the statistical property of quantum spectra is closely related to the coupling between energy levels, which depends on the symmetry and structure of the mean field. If the system under consideration has a high degree of symmetry resulting in strong degeneracy of energy levels, the nearest neighboring level spacing distribution will obey a Poisson distribution. This means that the system is quite stable against chaos. If the symmetry of system is broken, a coupling between levels (i.e. their mutual repulsion) appears, and the level-spacing distribution becomes a Wigner distribution. This means that the system will be unstable against chaos. From the point of view of the interplay between order and chaos, the statistical features of spectra for low-lying nuclear energy levels and for energy levels at excitation energy around the neutron separation energy have been well studied both experimentally and theoretically. [8 13] Based on the realistic shell model calculations the spectral statistics of calcium isotopes has been demonstrated. [14] It has also been reported [15] that for a prolate deformation virtually no chaos is discernible while for the oblate case the motion shows strong chaos when the octupole term is turned on. Recently, the statistical features of spectra for the deformed space explored by the fission have been studied and a new insight into fission and hyperdeformation has been given. [16] The extension of this kind of investigations to superheavy nuclear systems is very valuable. Through analysis of statistical properties of spectra in superheavy nuclei we expect to obtain new insight into the behavior of the single-particle motion in the mean field formed by superheavy nuclear systems and, furthermore, to get important information about the stability of systems against chaos, i.e. the possible existence of shell-stabilized superheavy nuclei. The project supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant Nos. 19975073, 10175089, 10175093, 10235030, 10235020, the Nuclear Industry and Science Foundation of China and the Major State Basic Research Development Program in China under Grant No. G200077400

598 WU Xi-Zhen, LI Zhu-Xia, WANG Ning, and J.A. Maruhn Vol. 39 2 Method Aiming for this goal, in this paper we will study the nearest neighbor level-spacing distributions in superheavy systems based on mean-field models. In order to calculate the energy levels of superheavy nuclear systems, the SHF approach and the relativistic mean-field models are employed. [17,18] In the SHF model, nucleons are described as non-relativistic particles moving independently in a common self-consistent field. The energy functional of nucleons is ε SHF = ε kin + ε sk + ε sk,sl + ε c + ε pair ε cm, (1) where ε kin is the kinetic energy functional, ε sk is the Skyrme functional, ε sk,sl is the spin-orbit term, ε c is the Coulomb energy (including the exchange term), ε pair is the pairing energy, and ε cm is the center of mass correction. In the RMF model, nucleons are described as independent Dirac particles moving in local isoscalar-scalar, isoscalarvector, and isovector-vector mean fields usually associated with σ, ω, and ρ mesons, respectively. The energy functional of nucleons in the RMF model, ε RMF = ε kin + ε σ + ε ω + ε ρ + ε c + ε pair ε cm, (2) is composed of the kinetic energy of nucleons, the interaction energies of the σ, ω, and ρ fields, and the Coulomb energy. The pairing energy and center of mass correction are treated in the same way as in the SHF model. The single-particle energies needed in the statistical analysis of spectra are eigenvalues of the one-body Hamiltonion of the nucleons obtained by variation of the energy functional (1) or (2). The SHF and RMF calculations are carried out using the coordinate-space codes of Refs. [19] and [20]. Since the level density of neutrons (protons) changes greatly with the level energy, we introduce an unfolding procedure [21] in order to study local statistical properties of levels, such as the level spacing distribution. This means that for a given stretch of levels (with the same angular momentum and parity), one has to divide them into many sets. In each set, the local mean level spacing S is calculated by the energy interval and the number of levels within the set. From this mean spacing, the level spacing distribution for a given set of levels is readily available. The resultant distribution is obtained by an ensemble average. To quantify the regularity (or chaoticity) of the level spacing distribution in terms of a parameter, we compare it with the Brody distribution P (s, ω) = α(ω + 1)s ω exp( αs ω+1 ), (3) where [ ( ω + 2 )] ω+1 α = Γ. (4) ω + 1 This distribution interpolates between the Poisson distribution (ω = 0) of regular systems and the Wigner distribution (ω = 1) of chaotic ones (GOE). The parameter ω can be used as a simple quantitative measurement of the degree of regularity (or chaoticity), that is, the smaller ω is, the larger the stability of the corresponding system is. 3 Results and Discussions Since we use the coordinate space code to make the SHF and RMF calculations, it is necessary to check whether the size of the coordinate-space box is sufficient. To do so, we examine the influence of the box size on the energy levels and statistical results of spectra for 208 Pb. As is well known, 208 Pb is a very stable nucleus because of the doubly magic structure. Therefore, the typical Poisson distribution of the level spacings is expected in this case, which provides a good check for the minimum box size needed in the model calculations. In Fig. 1 we show the statistical properties of the spectra by histograms for different sizes of coordinate-space box for 208 Pb, where the energy levels are produced by the RMF model with force of NL-Z2. For comparison, Poisson and Wigner distributions are also shown by dashed and dotted lines, respectively. Furthermore, to quantify the regularity of level spacing distributions the best fit Brody parameters are also denoted in each of the subfigures. Clearly with increasing the size of the coordinate-space box the level spacing distribution gradually approaches a Poisson distribution and the best-fit Brody parameters approach zero. When the size of the coordinate-space box is larger than 22 fm (Figs. 1(c) and 1(d)), one can obtain a very regular state (stable state) for 208 Pb. However, for the case of a smaller box (see Figs. 1(a) and 1(b)) the level-spacing distribution greatly deviates from the Poisson distribution, which is in conflict with the well-known fact that 208 Pb is very stable. This means that the results obtained in these cases are not physically correct and cannot be accepted. We would therefore like to mention that the statistical analysis of spectra is one of the most effective approaches for checking whether the coordinate or configuration in mean-field calculations is large enough or not. Thus, in the following SHF and RMF calculations we always set the size of the coordinate-space box larger than 22 fm. According to the shell correction study based on SHF model calculations, [17,18,22] the spherical magic neutron number in the superheavy element region is about N = 184 and all isotones with N = 184 have been predicted to have spherical shapes. The N = 172 shell effect is also strong, but it exhibits an evident force dependence. In Refs. [17], [18], and [22], the proton shell corrections were also studied and it was found that the proton shell corrections are generally smaller than those for the neutrons. With this knowledge, we choose the systems with a fixed proton number Z = 120 and neutron numbers N = 150, 158, 164, 172, 182, 184, and 190, respectively, for this investigation.

No. 5 Statistical Behaviors of Quantum Spectra in Superheavy Nuclei 599 Fig. 1 The nearest-neighbor level-spacing distributions of 208 Pb for different sizes of coordinate-space boxes. Subfigures (a), (b), (c), and (d) stand for box sizes of 12, 17, 22, and 30 fm, respectively. The histograms are our numerical results. The dashed lines and dotted lines represent a Poisson distribution and Wigner distribution, respectively. The best-fit Brody parameters are also indicated in each of the subfigures. As the first step to study the stability of superheavy systems from the statistical aspect of the spectra, we perform calculations with the SHF model with several different versions of the Skyrme force including the force SLY6 and then make systematic statistical analysis of the neutron levels for all the above systems. As an example, we show the nearest-neighbor level-spacing distributions of the neutron spectra for systems with neutron numbers N = 158, 172, 184, and 190 in Fig. 2. The histograms represent our numerical results and for comparison we also draw the Poisson and Wigner distributions in dashed and dotted lines. To quantify the regularity of the level-spacing distributions we notice the Brody parameters in each of the subfigures. It can be seen that with increasing neutron numbers from 158 to 172 and then to 184 the level spacing distributions of the neutrons gradually approach a typical Poisson distribution (see Figs. 2(a), 2(b), and 2(c)). For the case with even more neutrons, such as N = 190, however the distribution deviates from the Poisson distribution (see Fig. 2(d)). Therefore the general tendency is that the regularity shown by the level spacing distributions keeps increasing up to N = 184, but after N = 184, this trend stops and the regularity decreases. From this study we may draw a conclusion that for the system of Z = 120 and N = 184 the most regular single-particle motion of neutrons is expected in the mean field formed by superheavy systems based on the SHF model. This means that the corresponding system is more stable than the other systems with the same proton number but different neutron numbers. The RMF model was also used to investigate the possible existence of superheavy systems. In this study there exist many parameter sets which differ in details. For the purpose of the present study, we chose one of the most successful parameter sets for heavy nuclear systems, NL- Z2, to perform RMF calculations. In Refs. [17] and [18] it was predicted that the minimum of the neutron shell correction is located at N = 172 and the proton shell correction at Z = 120 is strongly correlated to neutron number N = 172 by looking at the proton shell corrections along the chain of N = 172 and 184 isotones. Based on this study we choose the same systems as with SHF for investigation.

600 WU Xi-Zhen, LI Zhu-Xia, WANG Ning, and J.A. Maruhn Vol. 39 Fig. 2 The nearest-neighbor level-spacing distributions for systems with proton numbers Z = 120 and neutron numbers (a) N = 158, (b) N = 172, (c) N = 184, and (d) N = 190. The histograms are our numerical results based on the SHF model. The dashed lines and dotted lines represent a Poisson distribution and Wigner distribution, respectively. The best-fit Brody parameters are also indicated in each of the subfigures. We carried out the statistical analysis of the quantum spectra for those systems systematically. As an example, the level-spacing distributions of neutrons for the systems with Z = 120 and N = 158, 164, 172, and 184 are displayed by histograms in Fig. 3. The Poisson and Wigner distributions are also shown in each of the subfigures for comparison, and to quantify the regularity the Brody parameters are indicated in each subfigure. From this figure we can see that the regularity shown by the level-spacing distributions first increases and then decreases with increasing neutron number. This behavior is similar to that in the SHF case. The strongest regularity of the statistical results (the typical Poisson distribution of level spacings), however, appears for N = 172 in the RMF model and not for N = 184 as in the SHF model. This model-dependent difference in prediction of the most stable superheavy systems has also been found in the shell correction study. This implies that there is the relation between the statistical analysis of spectra and the shell correction in characterizing the stability of systems. In order to demonstrate that the statistical analysis of spectra is a valuable approach in characterizing the stability of systems, let us make a comparison between it and the shell correction approach. As is already mentioned, the shell correction reflecting the stability of systems results from the fluctuation of levels very close to Fermi energy, and the statistical property of spectra depends on the local fluctuation of a set of levels, which relates the single particle motion to the stability of the system against chaos. Based on these considerations, we demonstrate the shell correction and Brody parameters for superheavy systems of Z = 120 as functions of neutron numbers in Figs. 4(a) and 4(b), respectively. In each subfigure the solid line represents the results based on the SHF model with the force SLY6, and the dashed line is for the results based on the RMF model with the force NL-Z2. Through the comparison between solid and dashed curves in Figs. 4(a) and 4(b), we have found that there is quite a similar behavior of the Brody parameter and shell correction as functions of neutron number in both the SHF and the RMF. Therefore, we may conclude that the statistical analysis of spectra can indeed give very valuable information on predicting and studying suprheavy systems. Although this study is very preliminary, the significance of this kind of study can go far beyond the investigation on the stability of superheavy systems and may also give a deep insight into the single particle motion in the mean field formed by the superheavy system, which is one of the

No. 5 Statistical Behaviors of Quantum Spectra in Superheavy Nuclei 601 most fundamental problems in superheavy nuclear study. It may be hoped that this will open up a new research field on the transition from order to chaos in superheavy region. Fig. 3 The same as Fig. 2 for systems with proton numbers Z = 120 and neutron numbers (a) N = 158, (b) N = 164, (c) N = 172, and (d) N = 184. The histograms are our numerical results based on the RMF model. Fig. 4 (a) The neutron shell corrections for Z = 120 isotopes calculated in the SHF model with the force SLY6 ( solid line) and the RMF model with the force NL-Z2 (dashed line); (b) The best-fit Brody parameter as a function of neutron numbers for Z = 120 isotopes. The solid and dashed lines stand for the SHF model with the force SLY6 and the RMF model with the force NL-Z2, respectively. Acknowledgments Two of the authors (Wu and Li) are indebted to the Alexander von Humboldt-Stiftung for financial support and to the Institut für Theoretische Physik der Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universität for its warm hospitality. We also thank Dr. M. Bender for providing us with part of the nuclear level data.

602 WU Xi-Zhen, LI Zhu-Xia, WANG Ning, and J.A. Maruhn Vol. 39 References [1] S. Hofmann, Rep. Prog. Phys. 61 (1998) 639. [2] Yu.A. Lazarev, Yu.V. Lobanov, Yu.Ts. Oganessian, et al., Phys. Rev. C54 (1996) 620. [3] U. Mosel and W. Greiner, Z. Phys. 217 (1968) 256; Z. Phys. 222 (1969) 261. [4] S.G. Nillson, C.F. Tsang, A. Sobiczewski, et al., Nucl. Phys. A131 (1969) 1; ibib. A115 (1968) 545. [5] P. Quentin and H. Flocard, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 28 (1978) 523. [6] P.-G. Reinhard, Pep. Prog. Phys. 52 (1989) 439. [7] P. Ring, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 37 (1996) 194. [8] R.U. Hag, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 48 (1982) 1086. [9] B.M. Mottelson, Nucl. Phys. A557 (1993) 717c. [10] J.D. Garrett, J.Q. Robinson, and A.J. Foglia, Phys. Lett. B392 (1997) 24. [11] O. Bohigas, R.U. Hag, and A. Pandy, Fluctuation Properties of Nuclear Energy Levels and Widths Comparison of Theory with Experiment, Nuclear Data for Science and Technology, ed., K.H. Bockhoff, Dordrecht: Reidel (1983) pp. 809 813; Phys. Rev. Lett. 54 (1985) 1645. [12] A. Bulgac, G. Do Dang, and D. Kusnezov, Phys. Rev. E58 (1996) 196; Ann. Phys. N.Y. 242 (1995) 1. [13] A. Pandey, Quantum Chaos and Statistical Nuclear Physics, eds. T.H. Seligman and H. Nishioka, Lecture Notes in Physics 263, Springer-Verlag, Berlin (1986). [14] J.M.G. Gómez, V.R. Manfred, and L. Salasnich, Phys. Rev. C58 (1998) 2108. [15] W.D. Heiss, R.G. Nazmitdinov, and S. Radu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 72 (1994) 2351. [16] Xi-Zhen Wu, Jian-Zhong Gu, Yi-Zhong Zhuo, Zhu-Xia Li, Yong-Shou Chen, and W. Greiner, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79 (1997) 4542. [17] A.T. Kruppa, M. Bender, W. Nazrewicz, et al., Phys. Rev. C61 (2000) 034313-1-13. [18] M. Bender, K. Rutz, P.-G. Reinhard, et al., Phys. Rev. C60 (1999) 034304-1-20. [19] P.-G. Reinhard, Computational Nuclear Physics, eds. K. Langanke, S.E. Koonin, and J.A. Maruhn, Springer- Verlag, Berlin (1991) p. 28. [20] K. Rutz, Ph.D thesis, J.W. Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main, Ibiden-Verlag, Stuttgart (1999). [21] T.A. Brody, et al., Rev. Mod. Phys. 53 (1981) 385. [22] S. Ćwiok, J. Dobaczewski, P.H. Heenen, P. Magierski, et al., Nucl. Phys. A611 (1996) 211.