Clifford Algebras and Their Decomposition into Conjugate Fermionic Heisenberg Algebras

Similar documents
Unifying Ancient and Modern Geometries Through Octonions

Tutorial 5 Clifford Algebra and so(n)

Quantum Field Theory

As usual, these notes are intended for use by class participants only, and are not for circulation. Week 6: Lectures 11, 12

Attempts at relativistic QM

Quantum Field Theory

Quantum Field Theory

Plan for the rest of the semester. ψ a

Introduction to Modern Quantum Field Theory

Representations of Lorentz Group

HIGHER SPIN PROBLEM IN FIELD THEORY

Quantum Physics 2006/07

The Dirac Field. Physics , Quantum Field Theory. October Michael Dine Department of Physics University of California, Santa Cruz

Extending the 4 4 Darbyshire Operator Using n-dimensional Dirac Matrices

PHY 396 K. Solutions for problem set #6. Problem 1(a): Starting with eq. (3) proved in class and applying the Leibniz rule, we obtain

Lecture 10. The Dirac equation. WS2010/11: Introduction to Nuclear and Particle Physics

Quantum Electrodynamics Test

3.3 Lagrangian and symmetries for a spin- 1 2 field

Quantum Field Theory I Examination questions will be composed from those below and from questions in the textbook and previous exams

Functional determinants

On the old and new matrix representations of the Clifford algebra for the Dirac equation and quantum field theory

arxiv:hep-th/ v1 19 Jul 2001

The role of symmetry in nuclear physics

The Dirac Equation. Topic 3 Spinors, Fermion Fields, Dirac Fields Lecture 13

Geometric Algebra 2 Quantum Theory

On the Heisenberg and Schrödinger Pictures

Physics 582, Problem Set 1 Solutions

7 Quantized Free Dirac Fields

Lecture 4 - Dirac Spinors

Particle Notes. Ryan D. Reece

and C 3 P 0 model in the Charming Strange Sector

Hidden structures in quantum mechanics

Disclaimer. [disclaimer]

msqm 2011/8/14 21:35 page 189 #197

Graded Lie Algebra of Quaternions and Superalgebra of SO(3, 1)

MSci EXAMINATION. Date: XX th May, Time: 14:30-17:00

x 3 x 1 ix 2 x 1 + ix 2 x 3

REVIEW. Quantum electrodynamics (QED) Quantum electrodynamics is a theory of photons interacting with the electrons and positrons of a Dirac field:

A definition of contraction of Lie algebra representations using direct limit

Hamilton-Jacobi Formulation of A Non-Abelian Yang-Mills Theories

Coordinate/Field Duality in Gauge Theories: Emergence of Matrix Coordinates

Quantum Theory and Group Representations

Algebraic Formulation of Hadronic Supersymmetry Based on Octonions: New Mass Formulas and Further Applications

Integrable Hamiltonian systems generated by antisymmetric matrices

3P1a Quantum Field Theory: Example Sheet 1 Michaelmas 2016

Dirac Equation. Chapter 1

Appendix A Notational Conventions

Spin one matter elds. November 2015

Week 3: Renormalizable lagrangians and the Standard model lagrangian 1 Reading material from the books

General-relativistic quantum theory of the electron

Generalized Rarita-Schwinger Equations

ISSN Article

DERIVATION OF DIRAC S EQUATION FROM THE EVANS WAVE EQUATION. Alpha Institute for Advanced Study

Citation for published version (APA): Halbersma, R. S. (2002). Geometry of strings and branes. Groningen: s.n.

Symmetries of the Schrödinger equation and algebra/superalgebra duality

3 Quantization of the Dirac equation

(b) : First, (S.1) = +iγ 0 γ 1 γ 2 γ 3 +γ 5. Second,

Lecture 4 - Relativistic wave equations. Relativistic wave equations must satisfy several general postulates. These are;

Classical-quantum Correspondence and Wave Packet Solutions of the Dirac Equation in a Curved Spacetime

Lie Algebra and Representation of SU(4)

where P a is a projector to the eigenspace of A corresponding to a. 4. Time evolution of states is governed by the Schrödinger equation

SUPERSYMMETRIC HADRONIC MECHANICAL HARMONIC OSCILLATOR

11 Spinor solutions and CPT

Isospin. K.K. Gan L5: Isospin and Parity 1

BRST and Dirac Cohomology

Emergence of Yang Mills theory from the Non-Abelian Nambu Model

The Lorentz and Poincaré Groups in Relativistic Field Theory

A Note On The Chern-Simons And Kodama Wavefunctions

On the deformed Einstein equations and quantum black holes

Relativistic Waves and Quantum Fields

Introduction to the Mathematics of the XY -Spin Chain

Lightlike solitons with spin

A simple and compact approach to hydrodynamic using geometric algebra. Abstract

arxiv: v1 [quant-ph] 12 Sep 2015

Geometric Algebra and Physics

Lorentz Invariance and Origin of Symmetries

Models of Neutrino Masses

Goldstone Bosons and Chiral Symmetry Breaking in QCD

752 Final. April 16, Fadeev Popov Ghosts and Non-Abelian Gauge Fields. Tim Wendler BYU Physics and Astronomy. The standard model Lagrangian

E 2 = p 2 + m 2. [J i, J j ] = iɛ ijk J k

Lecture 22 - F 4. April 19, The Weyl dimension formula gives the following dimensions of the fundamental representations:

Lecture 5: Orbital angular momentum, spin and rotation

Supersymmetric field theories

Spinor Formulation of Relativistic Quantum Mechanics

Modulo 2 periodicity of complex Clifford algebras and electromagnetic field

Chapter 13. Local Symmetry

Algebra of Complex Vectors and Applications in Electromagnetic Theory and Quantum Mechanics

Statistical physics and light-front quantization. JR and S.J. Brodsky, Phys. Rev. D70, (2004) and hep-th/

Construction of spinors in various dimensions

Two Fundamental Principles of Nature s Interactions

Group representations

The Barut Second-Order Equation: Lagrangian, Dynamical Invariants and Interactions

Modern Geometric Structures and Fields

Parity P : x x, t t, (1.116a) Time reversal T : x x, t t. (1.116b)

Path Integral Quantization of the Electromagnetic Field Coupled to A Spinor

129 Lecture Notes More on Dirac Equation

Physics 217 FINAL EXAM SOLUTIONS Fall u(p,λ) by any method of your choosing.

Division Algebras and Physics

On the quantum theory of rotating electrons

Transcription:

Journal of Physics: Conference Series PAPER OPEN ACCESS Clifford Algebras and Their Decomposition into Conugate Fermionic Heisenberg Algebras To cite this article: Sultan Catto et al 016 J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 766 01001 View the article online for updates and enhancements. Related content - The remarkable algebra so*(n), its representations, its Clifford algebra and potential applications A O Barut and A J Bracken - ALGEBRAS THAT ARE DEFORMABLE INTO FREE ALGEBRAS A A Boyarkin - Some examples of finitely generated algebras V T Markov This content was downloaded from IP address 46.3.194.08 on 0/1/017 at 17:3

International Conference on Quantum Science and Applications (ICQSA-016) Journal of Physics: Conference Series 766 (016) 01001 doi:10.1088/174-6596/766/1/01001 Clifford Algebras and Their Decomposition into Conugate Fermionic Heisenberg Algebras Sultan Catto 1,,, Yasemin Gürcan 3, Amish Khalfan 4,, Levent Kurt 5 and V. Kato La 6 1 Physics Department, The Graduate School, City University of New York, New York, NY 10016-4309 Theoretical Physics Group, Rockefeller University, 130 York Avenue, New York, NY 1001-6399 3, 5 Department of Science, Borough of Manhattan CC, The City University of NY, New York, NY 10007 4 Physics Department, LaGuardia CC, The City University of New York, LIC, NY 11101 6 Columbia University, New York, NY 1007 Work supported in part by the PSC-CUNY Research Awards, and DOE contracts No. DE-AC-076 ER 03074 and 03075; and NSF Grant No. DMS-8917754. Work supported in part by the PSC-CUNY Research Award No:69379-00 47 Abstract. We discuss a construction scheme for Clifford numbers of arbitrary dimension. The scheme is based upon performing direct products of the Pauli spin and identity matrices. Conugate fermionic algebras can then be formed by considering linear combinations of the Clifford numbers and the Hermitian conugates of such combinations. Fermionic algebras are important in investigating systems that follow Fermi-Dirac statistics. We will further comment on the applications of Clifford algebras to Fueter analyticity, twistors, color algebras, M-theory and Leech lattice as well as unification of ancient and modern geometries through them. 1. Clifford Algebras These are associative hermitian matrix algebras [1] with basis γ α ( α = 1,, n + 1) that obey γ α γ β = 1 {γ α, γ β } = 1 (γ αγ β + γ β γ α ) = δ αβ I (1) where I is a unit matrix of the same dimension as γ α. We have γ α = γ α, and γ α (γ β γ ρ ) = (γ α γ β )γ ρ () Content from this work may be used under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 licence. Any further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the title of the work, ournal citation and DOI. Published under licence by Ltd 1

International Conference on Quantum Science and Applications (ICQSA-016) Journal of Physics: Conference Series 766 (016) 01001 doi:10.1088/174-6596/766/1/01001 The basis elements γ α are linearly independent. The Clifford relation means that the square of each γ α is unity and two different γ α anticommute. (a) Suppose there are n such elements γ α. Define Then Also γ n+1 = ɛγ 1 γ γ n 1 γ n (3) {γ n+1, γ i } = 0 (i = 1,, n) (4) γ n+1 = ɛ ( 1) n (5) so that if ɛ = ( 1) n we have γ n+1 = 1. Thus the basis is generated by n elements γ 1,, γ n. (b) Construction of the algebra (Clifford, Dirac, Jordan and Wigner): Let n = 1. The answer is given by the hermitian traceless Pauli matrices τ 1, τ, τ 3. In this case τ 3 = iτ 1 τ. we have τ i τ + τ τ i = δ i I (6) where I is a unit matrix. The τ i act on complex -dimensional vector space U. We can also write τ = ie where e are the 3 quaternion units. Let n =. We take two commuting sets of Pauli operators σ (1) i and σ () acting in the vector space U U. We have seen that are 4 4 matrices with the properties σ (1) i = τ i I and σ () = I τ i (7) We define [σ (1) i, σ () ] = 0 (8) γ 1 = σ () 1, γ 3 = σ () γ = σ () 3 σ(1) 1, γ 4 = σ () 3 σ(1) (9) Then we find γ 5 = σ (1) 3 σ() 3 and {γ α, γ β } = δ αβ (10) Dirac s notation: σ (1) = σ, σ () i = ρ i. Then γ 1 = ρ 1, γ 3 = ρ, γ = ρ 3 γ 1, γ 4 = ρ 3 σ, γ 5 = ρ 3 σ 3. Next we look at its generalization. For arbitrary n we construct n + 1 different n n matrices that act on the vector space

International Conference on Quantum Science and Applications (ICQSA-016) Journal of Physics: Conference Series 766 (016) 01001 doi:10.1088/174-6596/766/1/01001 U } U {{ U } n factors of dimension n in terms of n commuting sets of Pauli matrices (11) σ (n) = τ I I I Then we construct the following n + 1 hermitian matrices: σ (n 1) = I τ I I σ (1) = I I τ (1) They satisfy γ 1 = σ (n) 1, γ n+1 = σ (n) γ = σ (n) 3 σ(n 1) 1, γ n+ = σ (n) 3 σ(n 1) γ 3 = σ (n) 3 σ(n 1) 3 σ (n ) 1, γ n+3 = σ (n) 3 σ(n 1) 3 σ (n ) γ n+1 = σ (n) 3 σ(n 1) 3 σ () 3 σ(1) 3 (13) γ α γ β + γ β γ α = δ αβ I (α, β = 1,, n + 1) (14) (c) General Representation of the Clifford Algebra: The automorphism group of the Clifford algebra is the unitary group U( n ). Indeed, if then γ α = Uγ α U, (UU = I) (15) γ αγ β + γ β γ α = Uγ α U Uγ β U + Uγ β U Uγ α U = U(δ αβ I)U = δ αβ I (16) For example the following different representations of the Dirac algebra: I : γ 1 = ρ σ 1, γ = ρ σ, γ 3 = ρ σ 3, γ 4 = ρ 1, γ 5 = ρ 3 Weyl rep. (17) II : γ 1 = ρ σ 1, γ = ρ σ, γ 3 = ρ σ 3, γ 4 = ρ 3, γ 5 = ρ 1 Dirac rep. (18) 3

International Conference on Quantum Science and Applications (ICQSA-016) Journal of Physics: Conference Series 766 (016) 01001 doi:10.1088/174-6596/766/1/01001 III : γ 1 = σ 1, γ = ρ σ, γ 3 = σ 3, γ 4 = σ ρ 1, γ 5 = σ ρ 3 Maorana rep. (19) are unitarily equivalent to the standard representation given above. (d) Reality properties in the standard representation: From the construction given above n + 1 elements of the basis (γ 1,, γ n and γ n+1 ) are real and symmetric while the remaining n elements (γ n+1,, γ n ) are imaginary and antisymmetric. (e) Generation of the n n matrix algebra from the Clifford algebra. γ α and I close under the symmetric Jordan product. They do not close under the matrix product since for instance where γ α γ β = 1 {γ αγ β } + 1 [γ α, γ β ] = 1 δ αβi + iσ αβ (0) σ αβ = 1 i [γ α, γ β ] (1) (called the spin matrices) are hermitian and linearly independent of γ α. Similarly γ α γ β γ ρ will contain a part independent of γ α and σ βρ up to products of γ α of degree n. The product of degree n + 1, namely γ 1 γ γ n γ n+1 () is proportional to the unit matrix as we have already seen. Hence a linear combination of all the powers of γ α from 0 to n span the whole n n matrix algebra. In the case of the Dirac algebra we have I, γ α and σ αβ respectively 1, 5, and 5 4 = 10 in number spanning the 16 independent elements of the 4 4 matrix algebra. (f) Let a = a α γ α. We have a = a α a α I. Let us now show an application: Take 4 of the γ α for n = : γ µ (µ = 1,, 3, 4). Let = γ µ x µ. Let ψ = mψ where ψ is a 4-column. Then ψ = µ µ ψ = ψ = m ψ (3) This is the relativistic wave equation for ψ. ψ = mψ is the Dirac equation. (g) Rotation of n + 1 dimensional vectors. 4

International Conference on Quantum Science and Applications (ICQSA-016) Journal of Physics: Conference Series 766 (016) 01001 doi:10.1088/174-6596/766/1/01001 Consider an infinitesimal transformation of the vector a α This transformation is a rotation if a α = a α + δa α (4) This entails a α δa α = 0. Hence if a αa α = (a α + δa α )(a α + δa α ) = a α a α (5) we must have Now let a = γ ρ a ρ, δa = γ ρ δa ρ (6) {a, δa} = 0 (7) δa = [ i 4 σ αβω αβ, a] = [ i ω, a] (8) where ω = 1 σ αβω αβ. We have Hence {a, δa} = i (a[ω, a] + [ω, a]a) = i (aωa a ω + ωa aωa) = 0 (9) a a + i [ω, a] (30) represents a rotation and 1 σ αβ are called spin generators. In component form we write In the case of the Dirac algebra (n = ) a α = a α + ω αβ a β (31) 1 σ αβ (α, β = 1,, 5) (3) generate 5 dimensional rotations, while 1 σ µν (µ, ν = 1,, 4) (33) generate 4 dimensional rotations. When ω 3, ω 31, ω 1 are real and ω 41, ω 4, ω 43 are imaginary δa = [ i σ µνω µν, a] (34) for the vector a with a 1, a, a 3 real and a 4 imaginary represents a Lorentz transformation in 3 space and 1 time directions (the Minkowski space-time). Under such a Lorentz transformation while + [ i ω, ] (35) 5

International Conference on Quantum Science and Applications (ICQSA-016) Journal of Physics: Conference Series 766 (016) 01001 doi:10.1088/174-6596/766/1/01001 ψ ψ + i ωψ (36) Thus transforms like a vector while ψ transforms like a spinor. Under such a Lorentz transformation the bilinear forms (where ψ = ψ γ 4 ) remains invariant, while transform like vectors.. Grassmann Algebra as Subalgebra of Clifford Algebra ψψ and i ψγ 5 ψ (37) ψγ µ ψ and i ψγ 5 γ µ ψ (38) Grassmann algebra and its conugate Grassmann algebra The Grassmann algebra is the algebra of associative anticommuting numbers. It is of order n if we can choose a basis b ( = 1,, n) such that and b i (b b k ) = (b i b )b k (39) {b i b } = b i b + b b i = 0, (or b i b = 0) (40) The associativity relation is automatically satisfied if b i is chosen to be matrices and they are multiplied with the rules of matrix multiplication. A standard set satisfying the anticommutativity relation can be obtained from the Clifford algebra of order n + 1 by choosing b = 1 (γ + iγ n+ ), ( = 1,, n) (41) We then verify that b = 0, and b b k = b k b for k. In the standard representation γ ( n) are real while γ n+ are imaginary so that b are real non-hermitian n n matrices. Another set of Grassmann numbers b of the same order can be obtained from b by a unitary transformation b = Ub U (4) with UU = I, where I is the n n unit matrix, or by the transformation to the conugate set which are also real and obey Let us now give examples: For n = 1 we have b = 1 ( (σ 0 1 + iσ ) = 0 b = 1 ( (σ 0 1 iσ ) = 1 b b = 1 (γ iγ n+ ) (43) b b k + b k b = 0 (44) ) 1 0 ) 0 0 (45) (46) 6

International Conference on Quantum Science and Applications (ICQSA-016) Journal of Physics: Conference Series 766 (016) 01001 doi:10.1088/174-6596/766/1/01001 b = 0, b = 0 (47) b = UbU, and b = Ub U (48) are not real in general. For n = (Dirac algebra) we can construct a Grassmann algebra of order and its conugate, briefly: b 1 = ρ 1 + iρ b = ρ 3 σ 1 + iσ (49) (50) b 1 = b = 0, b1b = b b 1 (51) b 1 = ρ 1 iρ b = ρ σ 1 iσ 3 (5) (53) b 1 = b = 0, b 1 b = b b 1 (54) 3. Fermionic Heisenberg Algebra If the Grassmann algebra b and its conugate b are taken together we obtain b b k + b k b = 1 4 {γ + iγ n+, γ k iγ n+k } = δ k I (55) These relations are also invariant under the unitary transformation b Ub U. Thus from b and b k we obtain the Fermionic Heisenberg algebra {b, b k } = 0, {b, b k } = 0, {b, b k } = δ ki (56) These have the same structure as Poisson bracket relations among canonical variables (coordinates and momenta) in classical mechanics. The difference is that the Poisson bracket is anticommutative while the bracket used for the Fermionic Heisenberg algebra is commutative since it is an anticommutator. In the bosonic Heisenberg algebra commutator brackets with same formal properties as Poisson brackets are used. The n generators γ 1,, γ n of the Clifford algebra of order n + 1 can be recovered from the two conugate Grassmann algebras through γ = b + b, γ n+ = i(b b n+ ) (57) The last element γ n+1 of the Clifford basis can be expressed by means of b, b through the relation Now γ 1 γ n+1 γ γ n+ γ n γ n γ n+1 = i n I (58) γ γ n+ = i(i b b ) (59) 7

International Conference on Quantum Science and Applications (ICQSA-016) Journal of Physics: Conference Series 766 (016) 01001 doi:10.1088/174-6596/766/1/01001 so that 4. Further Remarks γ n+1 = n (I b b ) (60) =1 The present authors earlier developed octonion and split octonion [], [3] algebras that led into algebraic foundations of color symmetries in nature, into quark-antidiquark symmetries [4], [5], exotics and pentaquark formations. The formulations we put forth in this paper also have deeper applications in hadronic physics and in astrophysics. Further applications into Fueter analyticity, quaternion analyticity, twistor formalism, hyperbolic extensions of exceptional groups, M-theory and Leech lattices will be published in our forthcoming papers. References [1] S. Catto, Y. Gürcan, A. Khalfan and L. Kurt, Journal of Physics,411 (013) 01009 [] S. Catto, Y. Gürcan, A. Khalfan and L. Kurt, Journal of Physics,563 (014) 010096 [3] S. Catto, Y. Gürcan, A. Khalfan and L. Kurt, Journal of Physics,670 (016) 01016 [4] S. Catto and F. Gürsey, Nuovo Cimento A 86 (1985) 01 [5] S. Catto and F. Gürsey, Nuovo Cimento A99 (1988) 685 Acknowledgments: One of us (SC) would like to thank professor Abdullah Algın for the invited talk given at ICQSA-016 meeting in Eskişehir, Turkey, and for his kind hospitality. He is also grateful to late professor Feza Gürsey for useful discussions on many of the ideas presented in this coference. We would like to thank Professors Vladimir Akulov, Itzhak Bars and Francesco Iachello for many enlightening conversations. 8