Transverse spin asymmetries at low momentum transfer at STAR

Similar documents
Physics with Tagged Forward Protons using the STAR Detector at RHIC. The Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider The pp2pp Experiment STAR 2009

Driving Cycle Construction of City Road for Hybrid Bus Based on Markov Process Deng Pan1, a, Fengchun Sun1,b*, Hongwen He1, c, Jiankun Peng1, d

A027 Uncertainties in Local Anisotropy Estimation from Multi-offset VSP Data

Name Solutions to Test 3 November 8, 2017

β 1 = 2 π and the path length difference is δ 1 = λ. The small angle approximation gives us y 1 L = tanθ 1 θ 1 sin θ 1 = δ 1 y 1

The strong CP puzzle and axions

Math& 152 Section Integration by Parts

Jackson 2.26 Homework Problem Solution Dr. Christopher S. Baird University of Massachusetts Lowell

13: Diffusion in 2 Energy Groups

(See Notes on Spontaneous Emission)

Tagging with Roman Pots at RHIC. Proton tagging at STAR

1 Which of the following summarises the change in wave characteristics on going from infra-red to ultraviolet in the electromagnetic spectrum?

Space Curves. Recall the parametric equations of a curve in xy-plane and compare them with parametric equations of a curve in space.

Phys 7221, Fall 2006: Homework # 6

In-Class Problems 2 and 3: Projectile Motion Solutions. In-Class Problem 2: Throwing a Stone Down a Hill

A. TILQUIN C.E.R.N., Geneva, Switzerland

Purpose of the experiment

Pi evaluation. Monte Carlo integration

Physics 202H - Introductory Quantum Physics I Homework #08 - Solutions Fall 2004 Due 5:01 PM, Monday 2004/11/15

Phys 4321 Final Exam December 14, 2009

Physics 121 Sample Common Exam 1 NOTE: ANSWERS ARE ON PAGE 8. Instructions:

Particle Lifetime. Subatomic Physics: Particle Physics Lecture 3. Measuring Decays, Scatterings and Collisions. N(t) = N 0 exp( t/τ) = N 0 exp( Γt/)

Problem Set 3 Solutions

Do the one-dimensional kinetic energy and momentum operators commute? If not, what operator does their commutator represent?

Phys 6321 Final Exam - Solutions May 3, 2013

Chapter 0. What is the Lebesgue integral about?

Applied Physics Introduction to Vibrations and Waves (with a focus on elastic waves) Course Outline

Introduction: Measurements in Particle Physics

99/105 Comparison of OrcaFlex with standard theoretical results

8 Laplace s Method and Local Limit Theorems

LECTURE 14. Dr. Teresa D. Golden University of North Texas Department of Chemistry

QUANTUM CHEMISTRY. Hückel Molecular orbital Theory Application PART I PAPER:2, PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY-I

Lecture 3 Gaussian Probability Distribution

Lecture 21: Order statistics

Physics 9 Fall 2011 Homework 2 - Solutions Friday September 2, 2011

AQA Further Pure 1. Complex Numbers. Section 1: Introduction to Complex Numbers. The number system

The Wave Equation I. MA 436 Kurt Bryan

Special Relativity solved examples using an Electrical Analog Circuit

Scientific notation is a way of expressing really big numbers or really small numbers.

Simulation of Eclipsing Binary Star Systems. Abstract

A Brief Review on Akkar, Sandikkaya and Bommer (ASB13) GMPE

Shear and torsion interaction of hollow core slabs

References and Resources:

PHY4605 Introduction to Quantum Mechanics II Spring 2005 Final exam SOLUTIONS April 22, 2005

This final is a three hour open book, open notes exam. Do all four problems.

50. Use symmetry to evaluate xx D is the region bounded by the square with vertices 5, Prove Property 11. y y CAS

Section 14.3 Arc Length and Curvature

APPLICATIONS OF THE DEFINITE INTEGRAL

Light and Optics Propagation of light Electromagnetic waves (light) in vacuum and matter Reflection and refraction of light Huygens principle

University of Washington Department of Chemistry Chemistry 453 Winter Quarter 2010 Homework Assignment 4; Due at 5p.m. on 2/01/10

Electromagnetism Answers to Problem Set 10 Spring 2006

1B40 Practical Skills

( ) ( ) Chapter 5 Diffraction condition. ρ j

25 Which of the following summarises the change in wave characteristics on going from infra-red to ultraviolet in the electromagnetic spectrum?

Design Data 1M. Highway Live Loads on Concrete Pipe

A REVIEW OF CALCULUS CONCEPTS FOR JDEP 384H. Thomas Shores Department of Mathematics University of Nebraska Spring 2007

New data structures to reduce data size and search time

Section 5.1 #7, 10, 16, 21, 25; Section 5.2 #8, 9, 15, 20, 27, 30; Section 5.3 #4, 6, 9, 13, 16, 28, 31; Section 5.4 #7, 18, 21, 23, 25, 29, 40

Monte Carlo method in solving numerical integration and differential equation

4 The dynamical FRW universe

Electron Correlation Methods

AP Calculus Multiple Choice: BC Edition Solutions

Physics 741 Graduate Quantum Mechanics 1 Solutions to Final Exam, Fall 2011

Method of Localisation and Controlled Ejection of Swarms of Likely Charged Particles

Lecture 8. Band theory con.nued

Forces from Strings Under Tension A string under tension medites force: the mgnitude of the force from section of string is the tension T nd the direc

First Semester Review Calculus BC

MATH 253 WORKSHEET 24 MORE INTEGRATION IN POLAR COORDINATES. r dr = = 4 = Here we used: (1) The half-angle formula cos 2 θ = 1 2

Theoretische Physik 2: Elektrodynamik (Prof. A.-S. Smith) Home assignment 4

Field-Induced Axion Luminosity of Photon Gas via a-interaction N.V. Mikheev, A.Ya. Parkhomenko and L.A. Vassilevskaya Yaroslavl State (Demidov) Univer

Problems for HW X. C. Gwinn. November 30, 2009

( ) 2. ( ) is the Fourier transform of! ( x). ( ) ( ) ( ) = Ae i kx"#t ( ) = 1 2" ( )"( x,t) PC 3101 Quantum Mechanics Section 1

Chapter 5. , r = r 1 r 2 (1) µ = m 1 m 2. r, r 2 = R µ m 2. R(m 1 + m 2 ) + m 2 r = r 1. m 2. r = r 1. R + µ m 1

MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Physics Department Statistical Physics I Spring Term Solutions to Problem Set #1

Goals: Determine how to calculate the area described by a function. Define the definite integral. Explore the relationship between the definite

Log1 Contest Round 3 Theta Individual. 4 points each 1 What is the sum of the first 5 Fibonacci numbers if the first two are 1, 1?

f(a+h) f(a) x a h 0. This is the rate at which

arxiv:hep-ex/ v1 12 Sep 1998

MIXED MODELS (Sections ) I) In the unrestricted model, interactions are treated as in the random effects model:

THE INTERVAL LATTICE BOLTZMANN METHOD FOR TRANSIENT HEAT TRANSFER IN A SILICON THIN FILM

Solutions to Physics: Principles with Applications, 5/E, Giancoli Chapter 16 CHAPTER 16

7.1 Integral as Net Change and 7.2 Areas in the Plane Calculus

Math 113 Exam 2 Practice

Exploring parametric representation with the TI-84 Plus CE graphing calculator

west (mrw3223) HW 24 lyle (16001) 1

Nuclear Time-Reversal Violation and Atomic Electric Dipole Moments

Kai Sun. University of Michigan, Ann Arbor

200 points 5 Problems on 4 Pages and 20 Multiple Choice/Short Answer Questions on 5 pages 1 hour, 48 minutes

THE KENNESAW STATE UNIVERSITY HIGH SCHOOL MATHEMATICS COMPETITION PART I MULTIPLE CHOICE NO CALCULATORS 90 MINUTES

Review of Calculus, cont d

We divide the interval [a, b] into subintervals of equal length x = b a n

Math 113 Fall Final Exam Review. 2. Applications of Integration Chapter 6 including sections and section 6.8

Math 31S. Rumbos Fall Solutions to Assignment #16

Tests for the Ratio of Two Poisson Rates

Operations with Polynomials

THERMAL EXPANSION COEFFICIENT OF WATER FOR VOLUMETRIC CALIBRATION

Math 113 Exam 1-Review

CONIC SECTIONS. Chapter 11

1 ELEMENTARY ALGEBRA and GEOMETRY READINESS DIAGNOSTIC TEST PRACTICE

Chapter E - Problems

Transcription:

Trnsverse spin symmetries t low momentum trnsfer t STAR Dmitry Svirid (ITEP) for the STAR Collbortion EDS Blois 2011 14th Workshop on Elstic nd Diffrctive Scttering, Qui Nhon, Vietnm, December 15-21, 2011

Amplitudes nd observbles 1 2 3 4 5 s, t M s, t M s, t M s, t M s, t M 4 tot Im s d dt 1 3 t 0 spin non flip double spin flip spin non flip double spin flip single spin flip 2 2 4 s 2 2 2 2 2 1 2 3 4 5 (, ) d 4 * AN s t Im 2 5 1 2 3 4 dt s (, ) d 4 2 * * ANN s t 2 Re 2 5 1 2 34 dt s A Amplitudes nd observbles SS d 4 ( s, t) Re 2 dt s * * 1 2 3 4 A N Coulomb nucler interference Ech mplitude hs hdronic nd electromgnetic prts:, EM HAD s t s, t s, t i i i Min contribution to A N (, ): d 8 ( s, t) Im 2 dt s 1 3 2 4 EM * HAD HAD* EM 5 5 EM terms re clculble from QED? A N t HAD HAD HAD ( 1 3 ) / 2 tot hd t Prmetriztion: 5 r5 Im m p HAD t [ 1 1 2 Re Im ] 2 Re Im t t c 2 2 1 t t c r r r r 2 m tc t 5 5 5 5 N. H. Buttimore et. l. Phys. Rev. D59, 114010 (1999) Dmitry Svirid for the STAR Collbortion EDS Blois 2011 2

A N mesurements in the CNI region pp Anlyzing Power E704@FNAL p = 200 GeV/c PRD48(93)3026 HJet@RHIC p = 100 GeV/c PRD79(09)094014 no hdronic spin-flip no hdronic spin-flip pc Anlyzing Power pp2pp@rhic s = 200 GeV/c PLB632(06)167 no hdronic spin-flip E950@AGS p = 21.7 GeV/c PRL89(02)052302 no hdronic spin-flip with hdonic spin-flip Dmitry Svirid for the STAR Collbortion EDS Blois 2011 3

Romn pots t STAR Vert. RPs Scttered protons hve very smll trnsverse momentum nd trvel with the bem through the ccelertor mgnets Romn pots llow to get very close to the bem without breking ccelertor vcuum Optiml detector position is where scttered prticles re lredy seprted from the bem nd their coordinte is most sensitive to the scttering ngle through the mchine optics Bem trnsport equtions relte mesured position t the detector to the scttering ngle. x y D x D D y D = 11 21 31 41 Horz. RPs x L eff 22 32 42 13 23 33 43 L 14 24 y eff 44 STAR x y 0 * x 0 * y detector Horz. RPs Detector Pckge Vert. RPs x 0, y 0 : Position t interction point Θ* x, Θ* y : Scttering ngle t IP x D, y D : Position t detector Θ x D, Θ y D : Angle t detector The most significnt mtrix elements re L eff, so tht pproximtely x D L x eff Θ x * y D L y eff Θ y * Dmitry Svirid for the STAR Collbortion EDS Blois 2011 4

In the tunnel Romn Pot bove the bem Horizontl Romn Pots on both sides of the bem To STAR IR Romn Pot below the bem Integrtion of RPs with STAR for RUN-2009: STAR Trigger system STAR Dt qusition system STAR BBC or VPD for normliztion Additionl opportunities for other gols centrl production etc. Dmitry Svirid for the STAR Collbortion EDS Blois 2011 5

Si detector pckge 4 plnes of 400 µm Silicon microstrip detectors: 4.5 x 7.5 cm 2 sensitive re 100 um pitch => good resolution, low occupncy Redundncy: 2X- nd 2Y-detectors in ech pckge Closest proximity to the bem ~10 mm 8 mm trigger scintilltor with two PMT redout Totl 32 silicon plnes by Hmmtsu Photonics in 8 pckges Only 5 ded/noisy strips per ~14000 ctive strips. Trigger Scintilltor Si SVX chips Detector bord Al strips: 512 (Y), 768 (X), 50µm wide 100 µm pitch implnted resistors bis ring gurd ring 1 st stripedge: 490 µm LV regultion Michel Rijssenbeek Dmitry Svirid for the STAR Collbortion EDS Blois 2011 6

Detector performnce nd Elstic cuts Accurte hit cluster selection bsed on individul chnnel pedestls, cluster width nd totl chrge Excellent signl/noise rtio ~20, high detector efficiency >97% Combine clusters in different plnes of ech side into trcks using lignment dt from overlpping regions Convert trck coordintes to IP ngles using trnsport mtrix Anlyze the event for elsticity bsed on 2, number of trcks nd number of contributing plnes Efficiencies of 31 out of 32 Si plnes >97% Elstic correltion: Θ* EAST = Θ* WEST Width is dominted by the ngulr spred in IP ( ) X ( Y ) 2 2 2 2 ( (, mrd X) ( Y) ) / Cut : 2 5 (8.2% elstic event loss) Dmitry Svirid for the STAR Collbortion EDS Blois 2011 7

Inner detector Outer detector STAR System cceptnce nd t rnges Full 2 cceptnce in zimuth ngle 5 ( t ) rnges up to 0.03 (GeV/c) 2 Top detector Number of events in ech t-rnge Bem t<0.005 (Gev/c) 2 0.005< t<0.01 0.01< t<0.015 0.015< t<0.02 0.025< t Bottom detector Dmitry Svirid for the STAR Collbortion EDS Blois 2011 8

Clcultion of symmetry A N ( ) N Squre root formul: don t need externl normliztion, cceptnce symmetry nd luminosity symmetry cncel out We hve ll bunch polriztion combintions:,,, -- cn build vrious symmetries ( PB PY ) AN cos N ( ) N ( ) N ( ) N ( ) 1 ( ) N ( ) N ( ) N ( ) N ( ) B ( ) PA cos N B N ( PB PY ) AN cos N ( ) N ( ) N ( ) N ( ) N ( ) 1 ( ) N ( ) N ( ) N ( ) N ( ) where N ( ) N ( ) N ( ) N ( ) B B B B N ( ) N ( ) N ( ) N ( ) B B B B 2 2 ( ) PB PY ( ANN cos ASS sin ) 0.01 1 Both bems polrized hlf of the sttistics, but effect ~ (P B +P Y ) One bem polrized, the other unpolrized full sttistics, but effect is only ~P B (or P Y ) Opposite reltive polriztion effect ~ (P B P Y ) should be close to 0 systemtics check Bem polriztion: P B = 0.602±0.026 P Y = 0.618±0.028 P B P Y = 0.372±0.023 (P B +P Y ) = 1.221±0.038, (P B P Y ) = 0.016±0.038 = 0.013(P B +P Y ) Dmitry Svirid for the STAR Collbortion EDS Blois 2011 9

Rw single spin symmetry N =A N *P N ~ (P B +P Y ) NY ~ P Y NB ~ P B N ~ (P B P Y ) Typicl result for single t-rnge As expected, N N 2.0 B Y N N Low sttisticl errors 2-3% Single bem symmetries use the sme sttistics, but independent polriztion vribles cn be combined N is consistent with 0 proof of 2 sttements: (P B P Y ) ~ 0 nd Low systemtic shifts reflects smll devition of the bem spin from verticl direction the sme by ll clcultions Dmitry Svirid for the STAR Collbortion EDS Blois 2011 10

A N results nd r 5 estimtes Only sttisticl errors shown NO ccount for polriztion nd t uncertinties pp2pp (2003) result Re r 5 = -0.033 ± 0.035 Im r 5 = -0.43 ± 0.56 No significnt contribution of hdronic spin-flip mplitude: r 5 ~ 0 Accurcy improved ~20 times compred to pp2pp (2003) Dmitry Svirid for the STAR Collbortion EDS Blois 2011 11

Normliztion nd N systemtics checks Normliztion is bsed on inelstic event counts ssuming their negligible polriztion dependence Two independent STAR subsystems, both hving 2 cceptnce for forwrd prticles in est nd west: BBC bem-bem counters VPD vertex position detector Normlized counts: K +/ = N +/ /V +/, N +/ -- elstic event counts for certin spin combintion, V +/ -- normliztion fctor from BBC/VPD V ++ V + V + V N ( PB PY ) AN cos K ( ) K ( ) N ( ) 1 ( ) K ( ) K ( ) V +/ differs beyond sttisticl error (0.25%) for VPD/BBC two different physics processes verge Asymmetry vlue in good greement Smll systemtic errors High normliztion qulity but my not be good enough for A NN & A SS N / N N = 1.01 Dmitry Svirid for the STAR Collbortion EDS Blois 2011 12

A NN nd A SS Cnnot use squre root formul hve to rely on normlized counts K +/ All t-rnges 2 2 NN ( ) PB PY ( ANN cos ASS sin ) ( K ( ) K ( )) ( K ( ) K ( )) ( K ( ) K ( )) ( K ( ) K ( )) Double spin effects re seen nd not consistent with 0 Both A NN nd A SS re very smll ~10 3 (except for the lowest t-rnge where lrger systemtic shifts my occur) Need better systemtic error studies current normliztion uncertinties re of the order of the effect Dmitry Svirid for the STAR Collbortion EDS Blois 2011 13

Conclusions nd plns SUMMARY Romn Pots instlled t STAR IR nd integrted into STAR detector for low t studies ~2010 6 elstic events recorded in 40 hours of dt tking in 5 dys with RPs in 2009 t s=200 GeV nd specil mchine optics *=21 m Excellent detector performnce provides extremely clen dt set Single spin symmetry A N obtined with unprecedented 2% ccurcy in 5 t-rnges No significnt contribution of hdronic spin-flip mplitude seen: r 5 ~ 0 Double spin effects re seen, but need more ccurte normliztion studies THE WAY TO THE FINAL RESULT Accurte MC simultions of trnsport nd comprison with dt done Finlize detector lignment bsed on dt nd MC done Derive finl vlues of systemtic uncertinties in t, A N, r 5 in progress Normliztion studies for double spin symmetries in progress. FURTHER PLANS Mesurements of A LL t s=200 GeV longitudinl polriztion is possible with STAR spin rottors Mesurements t s=500 GeV: TOT, diffrction cone slope b, A N (expect r 5 ~0) Dmitry Svirid for the STAR Collbortion EDS Blois 2011 14