Teaching the Geocentric Model Dr. David H Bradstreet Distributed by Spitz, Inc

Similar documents
Learning Objectives. one night? Over the course of several nights? How do true motion and retrograde motion differ?

History of Astronomy - Part I. Ancient Astronomy. Ancient Greece. Astronomy is a science that has truly taken shape only in the last couple centuries

Claudius Ptolemaeus Second Century AD. Jan 5 7:37 AM

Chapter 02 The Rise of Astronomy

Gravitation Part I. Ptolemy, Copernicus, Galileo, and Kepler

The Birth of Astronomy. Lecture 3 1/24/2018

Lecture #4: Plan. Early Ideas of the Heavens (cont d): Geocentric Universe Heliocentric Universe

Astronomy Studio Exercise Geocentric and Heliocentric World Views Guy Worthey

History of Astronomy. Historical People and Theories

Introduction To Modern Astronomy II

Observing the Solar System 20-1

Lecture #5: Plan. The Beginnings of Modern Astronomy Kepler s Laws Galileo

January 19, notes.notebook. Claudius Ptolemaeus Second Century AD. Jan 5 7:37 AM

1. The Moon appears larger when it rises than when it is high in the sky because

Physics Unit 7: Circular Motion, Universal Gravitation, and Satellite Orbits. Planetary Motion

How big is the Universe and where are we in it?

Teaching the Mystery of Tides and the Moon Dr. David H Bradstreet Distributed by Spitz, Inc

AST101: Our Corner of the Universe Lab 5: Solar System Models

If Earth had no tilt, what else would happen?

Gravitation and the Motion of the Planets

Introduction To Modern Astronomy I

cosmogony geocentric heliocentric How the Greeks modeled the heavens

EXAM #2. ANSWERS ASTR , Spring 2008

Astronomy 100 Section 2 MWF Greg Hall. Outline. Total Lunar Eclipse Time Lapse. Homework #1 is due Friday, 11:50 a.m.!!!!!

DeAnza College Winter First Midterm Exam MAKE ALL MARKS DARK AND COMPLETE.

Earth Science, 11e. Origin of Modern Astronomy Chapter 21. Early history of astronomy. Early history of astronomy. Early history of astronomy

Was Ptolemy Pstupid?

Gravitation and the Waltz of the Planets

Gravitation and the Waltz of the Planets. Chapter Four

In so many and such important. ways, then, do the planets bear witness to the earth's mobility. Nicholas Copernicus

Lecture 19 Copernicus on the Earth s Orbit around the Sun

Early Theories. Early astronomers believed that the sun, planets and stars orbited Earth (geocentric model) Developed by Aristotle

Venus Project Book, the Galileo Project, GEAR

Most of the time during full and new phases, the Moon lies above or below the Sun in the sky.

[05] Historical Perspectives (9/12/17)

Wednesday, January 28

A tour along the road to modern science

Evidence that the Earth does not move: Greek Astronomy. Aristotelian Cosmology: Motions of the Planets. Ptolemy s Geocentric Model 2-1

Test Bank for Life in the Universe, Third Edition Chapter 2: The Science of Life in the Universe

Lecture 3: History of Astronomy. Astronomy 111 Monday September 4, 2017

Exercise 3: The history of astronomy

Motions of the Planets ASTR 2110 Sarazin

Earth Science, 13e Tarbuck & Lutgens

Chapter 2 The Science of Life in the Universe

Astronomy Notes Chapter 02.notebook April 11, 2014 Pythagoras Aristotle geocentric retrograde motion epicycles deferents Aristarchus, heliocentric

Planetary Orbits: Kepler s Laws 1/18/07

APAS Laboratory 1 Planetary Motions PLANETARY MOTIONS

Chapter 4. The Origin Of Modern Astronomy. Is okay to change your phone? From ios to Android From Android to ios

Chapter 2 The Copernican Revolution

Lecture 13. Gravity in the Solar System

PHYS 160 Astronomy Test #1 Fall 2017 Version B

The Puzzle of Planetary Motion versus

Astronomy 101 Exam 2 Form AC-key

Planets & The Origin of Science

Ancient Astronomy. Lectures 5-6. Course website:

3) During retrograde motion a planet appears to be A) dimmer than usual. B) the same brightness as usual C) brighter than usual.

1) Kepler's third law allows us to find the average distance to a planet from observing its period of rotation on its axis.

ASTR 1010 Spring 2016 Study Notes Dr. Magnani

What is a Satellite? A satellite is an object that orbits another object. Ex. Radio satellite, moons, planets

Announcements. Topics To Be Covered in this Lecture

a. exactly 360 b. less than 360 c. more than 360 On Figure 1, draw the Earth the next day and justify your answer above.

I. Introduction. II. An Introduction to Starry Night NAME: ORBITAL MOTION

,.~ Readlng ~ What,~,~~ is a geocentric system? Chapter3 J 73

You should have finished reading Chapter 3, and started on chapter 4 for next week.

At Home Phases Demo. Astronomy 210. Section 1 MWF Astronomy Building. Geocentric vs. Heliocentric system. The Motion of the Planets

Lecture 5. Motions of the Planets

Name Class Date. Chapter 29. The Solar System. Review Choose the best response. Write the letter of that choice in the space provided.

Chapter 2. The Rise of Astronomy. Copyright (c) The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display.

Foundations of Astronomy The scientific method-winning or losing?

The following notes roughly correspond to Section 2.4 and Chapter 3 of the text by Bennett. This note focuses on the details of the transition for a

BROCK UNIVERSITY. 1. The observation that the intervals of time between two successive quarter phases of the Moon are very nearly equal implies that

Things to do today. Terminal, Astronomy is Fun. Lecture 24 The Science of Astronomy. Scientific Thinking. After this lecture, please pick up:

Motion in the Heavens

PHYS 155 Introductory Astronomy

Astronomy 1 Fall 2016

The History of Astronomy. Theories, People, and Discoveries of the Past

Kepler s laws. Astronomy 101 Syracuse University, Fall 2018 Walter Freeman. October 2, Astronomy 101 Kepler s laws October 2, / 23

Astronomy 1143 Quiz 1 Review

Directions: Read each slide

Ancient Cosmology: A Flat Earth. Alexandria

The Music of the Spheres

Models of the Solar System, Gravitation and the motion of the Planets A.K.A DEAD WHITE GUYS WEEK! 1/28/14

A100 Exploring the Universe: The Invention of Science. Martin D. Weinberg UMass Astronomy

What was once so mysterious about planetary motion in our sky? We see apparent retrograde motion when we pass by a planet

Reading Preview. Models of the Universe What is a geocentric model?

I'M DEAN REGAS, ASTRONOMER FROM THE CINCINNATI OBSERVATORY. AND I'M JAMES ALBURY, DIRECTOR OF THE KIKA SILVA PLA PLANETARIUM

Remember that for one of your observing projects you can go to a star party (stargazing). This is available at the Lawrence Hall of Science every 1st

Review of previous concepts!! Earth s orbit: Year, seasons, observed constellations, Polaris (North star), day/night lengths, equinoxes

Early Models of the Universe. How we explained those big shiny lights in the sky

9/12/2010. The Four Fundamental Forces of Nature. 1. Gravity 2. Electromagnetism 3. The Strong Nuclear Force 4. The Weak Nuclear Force

Inquiry 6.1 Gravity s effect on objects in motion

Ptolemy (125 A.D.) Ptolemy s Model. Ptolemy s Equant. Ptolemy s Model. Copernicus Model. Copernicus ( )

The Copernican System: A Detailed Synopsis

b. Remember, Sun is a second or third generation star the nebular cloud of dust and gases was created by a supernova of a preexisting

25. What is the name for a theory that describes the overall structure of the universe? A) field theory B) astrology C) cosmology D) astronomy.

Position 3. None - it is always above the horizon. Agree with student 2; star B never crosses horizon plane, so it can t rise or set.

Today. Review. Momentum and Force Consider the rate of change of momentum. What is Momentum?

Chapter 16 The Solar System

Practice Test DeAnza College Astronomy 04 Test 1 Spring Quarter 2009

ASTR 2310: Chapter 2

Transcription:

Epicycles Dome Teaching the Geocentric Model Dr. David H Bradstreet Distributed by Spitz, Inc Copyright 2017 - Contact Software

This presentation offers details on how to use the Epicycles Dome program to teach your students the fundamentals of the Ptolemaic Geocentric Model and to help them discover the a priori systemic oddities which are red flags to a bad theory. Introduction I spend a fair amount of time, especially in my Honors Cosmology course, going through ancient cosmologies and explaining why our ancestors believed what they believed about the workings of the heavens. These were highly intelligent people and they came up with ingenious methods to model what they perceived to be reality in the skies. Unfortunately, they came at many of these observations with deep-rooted prejudices and a priori (preconceived) beliefs which shackled their creativity. The most prevalent and far-reaching of these beliefs were that the Earth was immovable and at the center of the entire universe. Although of course we now know this to be preposterous to the extreme (even to the point that there is no such thing as a center to the universe), it is still a useful exercise to challenge students to prove, without leaving the Earth or using satellites, that the Earth does indeed rotate and that it revolves about the Sun. (Jean Bernard Léon Foucault proved its rotation only in 1851 using a large pendulum in the Panthéon in Paris, and James Bradley accidently discovered the aberration of starlight in 1729 while searching for stellar parallax which proved that the Earth was indeed moving around the Sun as well as giving us a method for determining the speed of light.) The Epicycles Dome program graphically illustrates the main characteristics of the Ptolemaic Geocentric Model. Its many features will be described via the teaching pedagogy that I use in helping students to discover the systemics of the model which can only be explained as it just has to be that way to match the observations. Whenever that is the reasoning, it signals a problem with the theory/model that needs to be improved or discarded in favor of a theory that explains the phenomena. This will become obvious as we go through the lesson. It is critical that you have demonstrated the celestial motions of the planets in the planetarium prior to investigating this geocentric model! You must especially point out the various retrograde paths of the planets and how Mercury and Venus seem to hover around the Sun, never straying from it more than 27 degrees for Mercury or 47 degrees for Venus. Without this background your audience will have no understanding as to why the epicyclical model was devised in order to mimic the motions of the celestial bodies while keeping the Earth stationary.

Teaching with the Program For simplification purposes, let s turn off all the bodies beyond the Sun for now. Uncheck the boxes so that your Control Panel display appears as in Figure 1. Figure 1 Superior Planets off

You dome display should now appear as shown in Figure 2. Figure 2 Outer planets beyond the Sun turned off Let s zoom in to the central part of the model such that we can see the bodies closest to the Earth out to the Sun. Move the scaling slider (see Figure 3) on the Control Panel until you see the dome display as shown in Figure 4. Figure 3 Scale slider zoomed in to inner part of geocentric system

Figure 4 Zoomed in to the inner part of the geocentric system out to the Sun I first emphasize that this diagram is not to any scale, but that s okay for teaching purposes. (Besides, the scale of the geocentric system was unknown! It wasn t until Copernicus postulated his heliocentric model that he demonstrated for the first time using straightforward geometry that a definite scale size was imposed upon his solar system. His values for distances from the Sun to the planets (out to Saturn at that time) in astronomical units were amazingly close to the modern ones!) Click on the Show Side View radio box to turn on the display of the Sun, Moon, Mercury and Venus below the dashed circle near the edge of the dome. Emphasize to your audience that this view will show them the appearance of the planets relative to each other as they appear from the stationary Earth. Press the continuous time step button and let the bodies move a little. You can adjust the speed at which they move by adjusting the time flow slider back and forth. Ask your audience to discuss approximately how much time is passing and how do they know? [Each time the Moon revolves around the Earth is approximately a month, and the Sun revolves in one year.] Ask them to describe the motions that they see. Also point out the motions of the planets and Moon in the narrow display at the bottom of the dome. Ask if the audience can see how the motions that they re seeing within the model spheres correspond to the dance of the planets and Moon that they see in the narrow strip beneath the dashed circle along the periphery of the dome. You will at some point probably want to zoom in closer to the Earth to better display the Moon s and Mercury s orbits as shown in Figure 5.

Figure 5 Zoomed in to see the Moon and Mercury s orbits Do they see any systematic motions going on? Do they understand why Mercury s epicycle has to be smaller than the one for Venus? [The celestial motions of Mercury made it appear to go back and forth by the Sun in smaller arcs (26 degrees on either side of the Sun) compared to 46 degrees on either side of the Sun for Venus.] Why is there no epicycle for the Moon or the Sun? [Neither displayed retrograde motion.] Usually someone in the audience will note that the center of the epicycles of Mercury and Venus are always lined up with the Sun. This is a critical and key observation. If the audience doesn t remark on this fact, then you must point it out. The question now is why do these epicycles always stay centered on the position of the Sun? The answer is because they must in order for this model to work! The center of the epicyclic motion of Mercury and Venus is the Sun; therefore their epicycles are locked on the Earth-Sun line. Turn on the Earth-Sun line in the upper left menu where it says Earth-Sun line as shown in Figure 6 to emphasize this fact.

Figure 6 The Earth-Sun Line displayed Here we have stumbled upon a red flag in the model/theory. If you cannot explain why the epicycles must be centered on the Sun other than it must be so to explain the phenomenon, then your theory is flawed if not out and out wrong. These red flags should always be emphasized because they stand out as flaws which must eventually be explained or the theory rejected. Of course we know that in the Copernican heliocentric model we don t need epicycles to cause Mercury and Venus to wobble back and forth around the Sun because they are simply closer to the Sun than Earth and they orbit the Sun. In fact, Copernicus was the first to completely untangle the motions of Mercury and Venus from the Sun s motion. In the geocentric model, the relative distances of the bodies from the Earth was simply one of relative motions, i.e., the bodies which appeared to move the fastest were deemed to be the closest to the Earth. However, in carefully inspecting the motions of Mercury, Venus and the Sun, we see that all three orbit around the Earth in one year! So which one is closest to Earth? This was a hotly debated subject within the geocentric proponents, and the major view which we depict here was arrived at because Mercury moves the fastest in its epicycle while it s moving around the Earth, Venus next fastest, and the Sun doesn t retrograde at all, and hence the order we have in this model. This confusion is one rarely discussed reason why the Copernican heliocentric model was so appealing. It unambiguously separated the motions of Mercury and Venus and even established, for the first time, their orbital periods around the Sun (88 days and 225 days, respectively). [See the lessons on Synodic Periods in Volume 3 of the Fulldome Curriculum.] In addition to watching the motions of the closer bodies to Earth, the Control Panel has sliders which, when slid to the right, will reveal a plot of the position of the planets motions showing their retrograde loops. The further the slider is moved to the right, the more of the past history of the motion is displayed, as shown in Figures 7 and 8 for Mercury and Venus, respectively.

Figure 7 Mercury s retrograde loops displayed Figure 8 Venus retrograde loop displayed

Now let s zoom out and concentrate on the planets beyond the Sun. Turn on all the planets in the upper left hand menu and move all the sliders to the far left. Zoom all the way out so that you can see all the planets, and then play time and have the audience carefully watch the motions of the more distant planets. Do they see anything systematic in the way that they move? I suspect that they will not, as the systematics of their motion are a bit more subtle than Mercury and Venus epicycles moving in lock step with the Sun. To help visualize the systematics, turn on the Lines function as shown in Figure 9 and the display will look something like Figure 10. Figure 9 Lines turned on via the Control Panel Figure 10 Epicycle radii Lines turned on

The Lines drawn are the lines from the Earth to the center of the epicycle for each planet as well as the radius of each planet s epicycle to the planet itself. Make sure that the Earth-Sun Line is also displayed. Play time again and see if this helps. If no one picks it up, then you will have to point out that the Earth- Sun Line is always parallel to the planet s epicycle radius. Again, the ancients noted this coincidence but could never explain it other than it has to be this way for the model to work. Another red flag has raised itself in the flawed Ptolemaic model! The basic reason for this coincidence is because the retrograde motion of each planet is a function of its position relative to the Earth in its own orbit. Since we re locking down the Earth and moving the Sun, it s the orientation of the Earth-Sun line that is the determining factor as to when planets exhibit their retrograde motions. You can now move the sliders for the outer planets to the right and continue time moving forward to display their retrograding loops, as shown in Figure 11. Figure 11 Outer planets orbits displayed with their retrograde loops Other questions you could ask your audience might be why Jupiter s retrograde loops are more spread out than Saturn s [because Jupiter moves faster and therefore farther in its orbit than Saturn in the time that the Earth-Sun line sweeps by and signals a retrograde loop]. You could also ask why Mars has only one loop in the time that Jupiter and Saturn have nearly two [because Mars moves so quickly it takes nearly two years in between retrograde loops as the Earth has to catch up with it (or the Earth-Sun line in this case)]. Don t be afraid to experiment with the program! My main purposes in using this teaching tool are to demonstrate how ingenious the system is in reproducing complicated celestial motions, but also to emphasize that preconceived notions can severely hamper scientific progress and that we often tremendously complicate a model in order to save it rather than objectively examine it and propose a newer, simpler one to replace it if the newer model works more simply at explaining the phenomena. But having the Earth move was a huge paradigm shift, and it took over 1500 years to overthrow it!