Math Real Analysis

Similar documents
Discrete Mathematics and Probability Theory Spring 2014 Anant Sahai Note 1

Contradiction MATH Contradiction. Benjamin V.C. Collins, James A. Swenson MATH 2730

STRATEGIES OF PROBLEM SOLVING

CSC Discrete Math I, Spring Propositional Logic

3 The language of proof

Basic Logic and Proof Techniques

The following techniques for methods of proofs are discussed in our text: - Vacuous proof - Trivial proof

LECTURE 1. Logic and Proofs

MATH 271 Summer 2016 Practice problem solutions Week 1

Section 3.1: Direct Proof and Counterexample 1

Some Review Problems for Exam 1: Solutions

Discrete Mathematics & Mathematical Reasoning Predicates, Quantifiers and Proof Techniques

EECS 1028 M: Discrete Mathematics for Engineers

Connectives Name Symbol OR Disjunction And Conjunction If then Implication/ conditional If and only if Bi-implication / biconditional

Discrete Mathematics and Probability Theory Fall 2012 Vazirani Note 1

Mat 243 Exam 1 Review

COMP 182 Algorithmic Thinking. Proofs. Luay Nakhleh Computer Science Rice University

Proofs. Joe Patten August 10, 2018

Mathematics 220 Midterm Practice problems from old exams Page 1 of 8

2. The Logic of Compound Statements Summary. Aaron Tan August 2017

1.1 Statements and Compound Statements

Logic, Sets, and Proofs

CS70 is a course about on Discrete Mathematics for Computer Scientists. The purpose of the course is to teach you about:

MA103 STATEMENTS, PROOF, LOGIC

Before you get started, make sure you ve read Chapter 1, which sets the tone for the work we will begin doing here.

Lecture 2. Logic Compound Statements Conditional Statements Valid & Invalid Arguments Digital Logic Circuits. Reading (Epp s textbook)

Mathematical Reasoning Rules of Inference & Mathematical Induction. 1. Assign propositional variables to the component propositional argument.

ELEMENTARY NUMBER THEORY AND METHODS OF PROOF

MATH10040: Chapter 0 Mathematics, Logic and Reasoning

Math 10850, fall 2017, University of Notre Dame

CS 340: Discrete Structures for Engineers

2.2: Logical Equivalence: The Laws of Logic

Basic Proof Examples

Introducing Proof 1. hsn.uk.net. Contents

1. Propositions: Contrapositives and Converses

Proof worksheet solutions

Discrete Mathematics

Topics in Logic and Proofs

Packet #2: Set Theory & Predicate Calculus. Applied Discrete Mathematics

Foundations of Mathematics MATH 220 FALL 2017 Lecture Notes

Undergraduate Notes in Mathematics. Arkansas Tech University Department of Mathematics

Proof Terminology. Technique #1: Direct Proof. Learning objectives. Proof Techniques (Rosen, Sections ) Direct Proof:

MATH 2200 Final LC Review

Chapter 2: The Logic of Quantified Statements

AMTH140 Lecture 8. Symbolic Logic

COT 2104 Homework Assignment 1 (Answers)

Induction 1 = 1(1+1) = 2(2+1) = 3(3+1) 2

Math.3336: Discrete Mathematics. Proof Methods and Strategy

Steinhardt School of Culture, Education, and Human Development Department of Teaching and Learning. Mathematical Proof and Proving (MPP)

Glossary of Logical Terms

Exercise 2. Prove that [ 1, 1] is the set of all the limit points of ( 1, 1] = {x R : 1 <

Discrete Mathematics and Probability Theory Spring 2016 Rao and Walrand Note 1

Conjunction: p q is true if both p, q are true, and false if at least one of p, q is false. The truth table for conjunction is as follows.

Propositional Equivalence

Introduction to Logic

WORKSHEET MATH 215, FALL 15, WHYTE. We begin our course with the natural numbers:

Proofs. Chapter 2 P P Q Q

Writing proofs for MATH 61CM, 61DM Week 1: basic logic, proof by contradiction, proof by induction

1.1 Language and Logic

INTRODUCTION TO LOGIC

MATH CSE20 Homework 5 Due Monday November 4

Logic Overview, I. and T T T T F F F T F F F F

Tools for reasoning: Logic. Ch. 1: Introduction to Propositional Logic Truth values, truth tables Boolean logic: Implications:

Foundation of proofs. Jim Hefferon.

Proof by Contradiction

We have seen that the symbols,,, and can guide the logical

Section 2.1: Introduction to the Logic of Quantified Statements

A Brief Introduction to Proofs

PHIL 422 Advanced Logic Inductive Proof

Predicate Logic. Predicates. Math 173 February 9, 2010

Math 38: Graph Theory Spring 2004 Dartmouth College. On Writing Proofs. 1 Introduction. 2 Finding A Solution

1 Propositional Logic

Lecture Notes 1 Basic Concepts of Mathematics MATH 352

2/2/2018. CS 103 Discrete Structures. Chapter 1. Propositional Logic. Chapter 1.1. Propositional Logic

Propositional Logic. Spring Propositional Logic Spring / 32

Sample Problems for all sections of CMSC250, Midterm 1 Fall 2014

Unit 1. Propositional Logic Reading do all quick-checks Propositional Logic: Ch. 2.intro, 2.2, 2.3, 2.4. Review 2.9

Proofs. Chapter 2 P P Q Q

Exercise Set 1 Solutions Math 2020 Due: January 30, Find the truth tables of each of the following compound statements.

LECTURE NOTES DISCRETE MATHEMATICS. Eusebius Doedel

CSC165. Larry Zhang, October 7, 2014

MATH10040: Numbers and Functions Homework 1: Solutions

Logic and Proofs. (A brief summary)

Proofs. Introduction II. Notes. Notes. Notes. Slides by Christopher M. Bourke Instructor: Berthe Y. Choueiry. Fall 2007

Note: The area of logic that deals with propositions is called the propositional calculus or propositional logic.

Contribution of Problems

Discrete Mathematics and Probability Theory Fall 2016 Seshia and Walrand Note 2

Notes for Math 290 using Introduction to Mathematical Proofs by Charles E. Roberts, Jr.

9/5/17. Fermat s last theorem. CS 220: Discrete Structures and their Applications. Proofs sections in zybooks. Proofs.

Discrete Mathematics. W. Ethan Duckworth. Fall 2017, Loyola University Maryland

Lecture 2: Proof Techniques Lecturer: Lale Özkahya

MTH 299 In Class and Recitation Problems SUMMER 2016

means is a subset of. So we say A B for sets A and B if x A we have x B holds. BY CONTRAST, a S means that a is a member of S.

Foundations of Advanced Mathematics, version 0.8. Jonathan J. White

CSE 20 DISCRETE MATH. Winter

Sequences of Real Numbers

MATH 135 Fall 2006 Proofs, Part IV

586 Index. vertex, 369 disjoint, 236 pairwise, 272, 395 disjoint sets, 236 disjunction, 33, 36 distributive laws

The Process of Mathematical Proof

Logic. Def. A Proposition is a statement that is either true or false.

Transcription:

1 / 28 Math 370 - Real Analysis G.Pugh Sep 3 2013

Real Analysis 2 / 28

3 / 28 What is Real Analysis? Wikipedia: Real analysis... has its beginnings in the rigorous formulation of calculus. It is a branch of mathematical analysis dealing with the set of real numbers. In particular, it deals with the analytic properties of real functions and sequences, including convergence and limits of sequences of real numbers, the calculus of the real numbers, and continuity, smoothness and related properties of real-valued functions. mathematical analysis: the branch of pure mathematics most explicitly concerned with the notion of a limit, whether the limit of a sequence or the limit of a function. It also includes the theories of differentiation, integration and measure, infinite series, and analytic functions.

4 / 28 In other words... In calculus, we learn how to apply tools (theorems) to solve problems (optimization, related rates, linear approximation.) In real analysis, we very carefully prove these theorems to show that they are indeed valid.

5 / 28 Thinking back to calculus... Most every important concept was defined in terms of limits: continuity, the derivative, the definite integral But, the notion of the limit itself was rather vague For example, means sin x lim x 0 x = 1 sin (x)/x gets close to 1 as x gets close to 0.

6 / 28 The key notion The key and subtle concept that makes calculus work is that of the limit Notion of a limit was truly a major advance in mathematics. Instead of thinking of numbers as only those quantities that could be calculated in a finite number of steps, a number could be viewed as the result of a process, a target reachable after an infinite number of steps.

7 / 28 What makes analysis different In the words of the author: In algebra, we prove equalities directly. That is, we prove that an object (a number perhaps) is equal to another object. In analysis, we generally prove inequalities. To illustrate: Suppose x is a real number. If 0 x < ɛ for every real number ɛ > 0, then x = 0. That is, to show that a positive number is zero, it is enough to show that it is less than any other positive real number.

8 / 28 Example of a major result using analysis Theorem (Fourier): Suppose f is a continuous function defined on the real numbers such that f (x + 2π) = f (x) for every x, and suppose that f is also continuous. Then f (x) = a 0 2 + [a 1 cos (x) + b 1 sin (x)] + [a 2 cos (2x) + b 2 sin (2x)] + [a 3 cos (3x) + b 3 sin (3x)] + where a n = 1 π π π f (t) cos(nt) dt, b n = 1 π π π f (t) sin(nt) dt

9 / 28 The plan Proofs: we want to prove things in analysis, so we ll start with a brief review of proof techniques. Set theory: before we work with sets of real numbers we have to get comfortable with some basic set theory. This will be review for many, but we ll also introduce a few new concepts and see some neat results. Real numbers: the stars of the show. Limits and all that comes after depend on the structure and properties of real numbers.

10 / 28 The plan, continued Sequences and Series: properties of lists and sums of real numbers: our first real look at limits. Continuous functions: important properties of continuous functions which follow from their examination using limits. The Derivative: We now have the machinery to prove some of the major results: chain rule, mean value theorem, Taylor s theorem.

11 / 28 The plan, continued The Riemann Integral: Again, defined in terms of limits. Fundamental Theorem of Calculus. Sequences of Functions: We can extend our study of limits of sequences of real numbers to limits of sequences of functions. The theory is fundamental to many fields: differential equations, harmonic analysis, functional analysis, etc.

Logic and Proofs 12 / 28

13 / 28 Statements: True or False? In mathematics we wish to establish whether a given statement is true or false. That is, we wish to establish the statement s truth value. Statement: a sentence that can be classified as true or false. Examples of statements: 2x = 4 has a solution. True! If f is a continuous function then f is differentiable. False! Every even number greater than 2 can be written as the sum of two prime numbers. Unknown! (Goldbach Conjecture: solve it and you would be famous!)

14 / 28 Compound Statements Compound statements are constructed from simple statements using connectives: not, and, or, if... then, if and only if. Example: If x and y are both odd numbers, then xy is odd. If simple statements of known truth value are combined using connectives, the truth value of the resulting compound statement can be determined.

15 / 28 Not Not: the logical opposite (negation). If p is a true statement, then not p is false. Example: 29 is prime. true Example: 29 is not prime. false If p is false, then not p is true. Example: 3 is even. false Example: It is not the case that 3 is even. true not p sometimes expressed p.

16 / 28 And And: conjunction of two statements. If p and q are statements, then p and q is true only when both p and q are true. Example: 64 is a square and a cube. true Example: 9 is a square and a cube. false p and q sometimes expressed p q.

17 / 28 Or Or: disjunction of two statements. If p and q are statements, then p or q is true if at least one of p and q is true. Example: 9 is a square or a cube. true Example: 9 is even or prime. false p or q sometimes expressed p q.

18 / 28 If... then If p then q: implication or conditional statement. If p then q is false when p is true while q is false. It is true in all other cases. Example: If n is an integer, then 2n is an even number. true Example: If n is any integer, then 2n + 1 is prime. false Example: If n is an integer and n 2 < 0, then n is prime. true

19 / 28 Other language for conditional statements If p then q is equivalent to p implies q p only if q q if p q provided that p p is sufficient for q q is necessary for p p = q

20 / 28 If and only if p if and only if q: logical equivalence. Equivalent to saying that both p implies q and q implies p true if both p and q are true, or both p and q are false. Example: x 2 = x if and only if x 0. true Example: f is a differentiable function if and only if f is continuous. false p if and only if q also written p q

21 / 28 Negation of compound statements not p and q is equivalent to not p or not q. not p or q is equivalent to not p and not q. not p implies q is equivalent to p and not q.

Standard Proof Techniques 22 / 28

23 / 28 Typical situation We wish to prove a statement (a theorem maybe) of the form if p then q. p is called the hypothesis and q the conclusion. Example: If n is an even integer greater than 2, then n can be written as a sum of two prime numbers.

24 / 28 Proof as an Art Steven Lay: The construction of a proof of the implication p = q can be thought of as building a bridge of logical statements to connect the hypothesis p with the conclusion q. The building blocks that go into the bridge consist of four kinds of statements: 1. definitions, 2. assumptions, 3. theorems that have been previously established as true, and 4. statements that are logically implied by the earlier statements in the proof. When actually building the bridge, it may not be at all obvious which blocks to use or in what order to use them. This is where experience is helpful, together with perseverance, intuition, and sometimes a good bit of luck.

25 / 28 Direct Proof To prove if p then q, assume statement p is true and use facts, theorems and logic to show that q is true. Example: Proposition: If n is an even integer then n 2 is also even. Proof: Suppose that n is an even integer. Then n = 2k for some integer k. Therefore, n 2 = (2k) 2 = 4k 2 = 2(2k 2 ) Since 2k 2 is an integer, 2(2k 2 ) is even, so n 2 is even.

26 / 28 Proof by Contrapositive The contrapositive of if p then q is if not q then not p. An implication and its contrapositive are logically equivalent. (Why?) To prove if p then q, it is sometimes easier to instead prove if not q then not p Example: Proposition: Suppose n is an integer. If 3n + 2 is even then n is even. Proof: We will prove the contrapositive: If n is odd, then 3n + 2 is odd. If n is odd, then n = 2k + 1 for some integer k. Therefore, 3n + 2 = 3(2k + 1) + 2 = 6k + 5 = 2(3k + 2) + 1 Since 3k + 2 is an integer, 3n + 2 is odd.

27 / 28 Proof by Contradiction A statement is either true or false. If assuming the statement is false leads to a contradiction of a hypothesis or known fact, then the statement cannot be false, so must be true. Example: Proposition: There are infinitely many prime numbers. Proof: Suppose (for a contradiction) that there are only finitely many prime numbers p 1 < p 2 <... < p n. Consider the positive integer q = p 1 p 2 p n + 1. q is greater than p n so cannot be prime, and so is divisible by some prime p 1, p 2,..., p n. But dividing q by any of these primes leaves remainder 1, so q is not divisible by any of p 1, p 2,..., p n. This is a contradiction. Therefore, there are infinitely many prime numbers.

28 / 28 Counter Examples A statement of the form p = q" which uses (or implies the use of) the words for all or for every is a statement about a property that applies to every member of some set. To show that such a statement is false, it is enough to produce one example for which p is true but q is false. Example: Conjecture: For every real number x, if x is irrational, then x 2 is irrational. Counerexample: 2 is irrational, but ( 2) 2 = 2 is not. Note that the conjecture is true for some x, for example x = π, but not all x as claimed. A single counter example is enough to refute the claim.