The modeling of hydraulic fractures applies three fundamental equations:

Similar documents
Hydraulic Fracture Mechanics

INCORPORATING RIGOROUS HEIGHT DETERMINATION INTO UNIFIED FRACTURE DESIGN. A Thesis TERMPAN PITAKBUNKATE

A PKN HYDRAULIC FRACTURE MODEL STUDY AND FORMATION PERMEABILITY DETERMINATION. A Thesis JING XIANG

ANALYSIS OF VERTICAL GROWTH OF FRACTURES IN FRAC PACK OPERATIONS IN RESERVOIR ROCKS

Optimization of a hydraulic fracturing process to enhance the productivity of a fractured well in ultra-low permeability environment

HYDRAULIC FRACTURE OPTIMIZATION WITH A PSEUDO-3D MODEL IN MULTI-LAYERED LITHOLOGY. A Thesis MEI YANG

Quasi-geostrophic motion

Effect of L/D Ratio on the Performance of a Four-Lobe Pressure Dam Bearing

Incorporating viscous, toughness, and intermediate regimes of propagation into enhanced pseudo-3d model

Prediction of Coating Thickness

6. Non-uniform bending

Heat Transfer Correlation for the V-Groove Solar Collector

Alexander M. Linkov Rzeszow University of Technology, Eurotech, Institute for Problems of Mechanical Engineering (Russian Academy of Sciences)

USING EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN AND RESPONSE SURFACE METHODOLOGY TO MODEL INDUCED FRACTURE GEOMETRY IN SHUBLIK SHALE THESIS. Presented to the Faculty

Induced Fractures Modelling in Reservoir Dynamic Simulators

Res. J. Appl. Sci. Eng. Technol., 12(10): , 2016

Modeling of Propagation of Interacting Cracks Under Hydraulic Pressure Gradient. Hai Huang, Earl Mattson and Rob Podgorney

A New Technique for Proppant Schedule Design

3. Using your answers to the two previous questions, evaluate the Mratio

Stability of Smart Beams with Varying Properties Based on the First Order Shear Deformation Theory Located on a Continuous Elastic Foundation

AN ANALYSIS OF AMPLITUDE AND PERIOD OF ALTERNATING ICE LOADS ON CONICAL STRUCTURES

Microdeformation: combining direct fracture height measurement with microseismic response Natalia Verkhovtseva, Greg Stanley

Nhan Hoang Thinh 1, Nguyen Huu Trương 2, Nguyen Van Hung 3, Luong Hai Linh 4, Vu The Quang 5 Petrovietnam University (PVU)

The Measurement of the Gravitational Constant g with Kater s Pendulum

Introduction to Structural Member Properties

WWM Extended to Account for Wave Diffraction on a Vurrent over a Rapidly Varying Topography

Poroelastic and Poroplastic Modeling of Hydraulic Fracturing in Brittle and Ductile Formations

Gas Shale Hydraulic Fracturing, Enhancement. Ahmad Ghassemi

Mechanics of Hydraulic Fracturing

Theoretical Analysis of Flow Characteristics and Bearing Load for Mass-produced External Gear Pump

Deviation from Linear Elastic Fracture in Near-Surface Hydraulic Fracturing Experiments with Rock Makhnenko, R.Y.

If your model can t do this, why run it?

MODELING OF ACID FRACTURING IN CARBONATE RESERVOIRS. A Thesis MURTADA SALEH H AL JAWAD

FRACTURE REORIENTATION IN HORIZONTAL WELL WITH MULTISTAGE HYDRAULIC FRACTURING

Week #15 - Word Problems & Differential Equations Section 8.2

Pressure Transient Analysis COPYRIGHT. Introduction to Pressure Transient Analysis. This section will cover the following learning objectives:

The development of contact and noncontact technique to study the heat dissipation in metals under loading

Journal of Applied Science and Agriculture. The Effects Of Corrugated Geometry On Flow And Heat Transfer In Corrugated Channel Using Nanofluid

Coalbed Methane Properties

Hydraulic validation of the LHC cold mass heat exchanger tube.

2.3. PBL Equations for Mean Flow and Their Applications

Integrating Lab and Numerical Experiments to Investigate Fractured Rock

Modified Formulation, ε-regularization and the Efficient Solution of Hydraulic Fracture Problems

THE EFFECT OF THERMOELASTIC STRESS CHANGE IN THE NEAR WELLBORE REGION ON HYDRAULIC FRACTURE GROWTH

CFD calculation of convective heat transfer coefficients and validation Part I: Laminar flow Neale, A.; Derome, D.; Blocken, B.; Carmeliet, J.E.

Exam in Fluid Mechanics SG2214

CALCULATION OF COLLAPSE PRESSURE IN SHALE GAS FORMATION AND THE INFLUENCE OF FORMATION ANISOTROPY

CFD calculation of convective heat transfer coefficients and validation Part I: Laminar flow. Annex 41 Kyoto, April 3 rd to 5 th, 2006

MICRO-MECHANICAL ASPECTS OF HYDRAULIC FRACTURE PROPAGATION AND PROPPANT FLOW AND TRANSPORT FOR STIMULATION OF ENHANCED GEOTHERMAL SYSTEMS

Physics Courseware Physics I

Nonlinear correction to the bending stiffness of a damaged composite beam

The effect of proppant size on hydraulic fracturing by a slurry

Meshless analysis of three-dimensional steady-state heat conduction problems

Modeling planar hydraulic fractures driven by laminar-to-turbulent fluid

A Modified Distributed Lagrange Multiplier/Fictitious Domain Method for Particulate Flows with Collisions

232 Calculus and Structures

Robustness to formation geological heterogeneities of the limited entry technique for multi-stage fracturing of horizontal wells

Section A 01. (12 M) (s 2 s 3 ) = 313 s 2 = s 1, h 3 = h 4 (s 1 s 3 ) = kj/kgk. = kj/kgk. 313 (s 3 s 4f ) = ln

Euler-Bernoulli Beam Theory in the Presence of Fiber Bending Stiffness

Methods for Optimal Control of Hydraulic Fracturing Process

Effects of Radiation on Unsteady Couette Flow between Two Vertical Parallel Plates with Ramped Wall Temperature

Exercise 19 - OLD EXAM, FDTD

Notes: Most of the material in this chapter is taken from Young and Freedman, Chap. 12.

INTRODUCTION DEFINITION OF FLUID. U p F FLUID IS A SUBSTANCE THAT CAN NOT SUPPORT SHEAR FORCES OF ANY MAGNITUDE WITHOUT CONTINUOUS DEFORMATION

3D ANALYSIS OF H-M COUPLED PROBLEM WITH ZERO-THICKNESS INTERFACE ELEMENTS APPLIED TO GEOMECHANICS

Hydraulic Fracture Propagation in Unconventional Reservoirs: The Role of Bedding Plane

Proppant Transport & Screenout Behavior. R.D. Barree

Deformation Processing - Rolling

Sand Control Rock Failure

Keys to Successful Multi-Fractured Horizontal Wells In Tight and Unconventional Reservoirs

THE FIRST SUCSESSFUL MULTI STAGED FRACTURING IN A DEEP VOLCANIC GAS RESERVOIR IN JAPAN

CMU Fall VLSI CAD

Part 2: Introduction to Open-Channel Flow SPRING 2005

Computer simulation of hydraulic fractures

Flow of Non-Newtonian Fluids within a Double Porosity Reservoir under Pseudosteady State Interporosity Transfer Conditions

NON STANDARD FITTED FINITE DIFFERENCE METHOD FOR SINGULAR PERTURBATION PROBLEMS USING CUBIC SPLINE

INFLUENCE OF TUBE BUNDLE GEOMETRY ON HEAT TRANSFER TO FOAM FLOW

2016 PRELIM 2 PAPER 2 MARK SCHEME

Large eddy simulation of turbulent flow downstream of a backward-facing step

2015 Training Course Offerings

Thermal Analysis of Axial Flux Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor using 3D Finite Elements

The Pennsylvania State University. The Graduate School. Department of Energy and Mineral Engineering

PETE 693 WELL STIMULATION, Spring 2014 Instructor: Dr. Dare Awoleke. Midterm, Thursday, 10 th April, 2014 Duration: 8:15 10:45am

Comment on Experimental observations of saltwater up-coning

Comparison of Heat Transfer Conditions in. Tube Bundle Cross-Flow for Different Tube Shapes

Pre- and Post-Fracturing Analysis of a Hydraulically Stimulated Reservoir

Recent Advances in Borehole Sonic Technology

Comparison of Efflux Time between Cylindrical and Conical Tanks Through an Exit Pipe

A Numerical Study of Laminar Natural Convection Heat Transfer and Radiation from a Rectangular Vertical Fin Array Quasi-3D approach

ractical Geomechanics for Unconventional Resources

CHAPTER 2 MODELING OF THREE-TANK SYSTEM

Keywords Mechanics, Extraction, Perforation, Fracturing ε = Strain Summary

Finite Element Analysis of J-Integral for Surface Cracks in Round Bars under Combined Mode I Loading

Development and Validation of Fully-Coupled Hydraulic Fracturing Simulation Capabilities

A = h w (1) Error Analysis Physics 141

Numerical Analysis on the Interaction between Two Zipper Frac Wells with Continuum Damage Model

What Microseismicity Tells Us About Re-fracturing An Engineering Approach to Re-fracturing Design

arxiv: v1 [math.na] 18 May 2018

Chapter 5 FINITE DIFFERENCE METHOD (FDM)

158 Calculus and Structures

Transcription:

Te modelin of ydraulic fractures applies tree fundamental equations: 1. Continuity. Momentum (Fracture Fluid Flow) 3. LEFM (Linear Elastic Fracture Mecanics)

Solution Tecnique Te tree sets of equations need to be coupled to simulate te propaation of te fracture. Te material balance and fluid flow are coupled usin te relation between te fracture widt and fluid pressure. Te resultin deformation is modeled trou LEFM. Complex matematical problem requires sopisticated numerical scemes. D models provide tractable solutions but are limited by assumptions 3D and pseudo-3d are less restrictive but require computer analysis

Perkins-Kern-Nordren Model (PKN) witout leakoff Te followin assumptions simplify te complex problem: 1. Te fracture eit, f, is fixed and independent of fracture lent.. Te fracture fluid pressure is constant in te vertical cross sections perpendicular to te direction of propaation. 3. Reservoir rock stiffness, its resistance to deformation prevails in te vertical plane; i.e, D plane-strain deformation in te vertical plane 4. Eac plane obtains an elliptic sape wit maximum widt in te center, w(x, t) 1 p f G Scematic representation of linearly propaatin fracture wit laminar fluid flow accordin to PKN model

Perkins-Kern-Nordren Model (PKN) witout leakoff 5. Te fluid pressure radient in te x-direction can be written in terms of a narrow, elliptical flow cannel, p 64 q x 3 w f 6. Te fluid pressure in te fracture falls off at te tip, suc tat at x = L and tus p =. 7. Flow rate is a function of te rowt rate of te fracture widt, q x f 4 w t 8. Combinin provides a non-linear PDE in terms of w(x,t): G w w 0 subject to te followin conditions, 64(1 ) w(x,0) = 0 for t = 0 f t x w(x,t) = 0 for x > L(t) q(0,t) = q i / for two fracture wins

Geertsma-de Klerk (GDK) Model witout leakoff Assumptions: 1. Fixed fracture eit, f.. Rock stiffness is taken into account in te orizontal plane only. D plane strain deformation in te orizontal plane. 3. Tus fracture widt does not depend on fracture eit and is constant in te vertical direction. 4. Te fluid pressure radient is wit respect to a narrow, rectanular slit of variable widt, p(0, t) p(x, t) 1q i f x dx 3 0 w (x,t) Scematic representation of linearly propaatin fracture wit laminar fluid flow accordin to GDK model

Geertsma-de Klerk (GDK) Model witout leakoff Assumptions: 5. Te sape of te fracture in te orizontal plane is elliptic wit maximum widt at te wellbore w(0, t) (1 )L(p f G ) Scematic representation of linearly propaatin fracture wit laminar fluid flow accordin to GDK model

Net pressure at wellbore, psi Stimulation Comparison 1000 900 800 700 600 500 400 300 00 100 0 PKN KGD 0 000 4000 6000 8000 Fluid volume, als

fracture lent, ft Stimulation Comparison 3000 500 000 1500 1000 500 PKN KGD 0 0 000 4000 6000 8000 Fluid volume, als

maximum widt at wellbore, in Stimulation Comparison 0.400 0.350 0.300 0.50 0.00 0.150 0.100 0.050 0.000 PKN KGD 0 000 4000 6000 8000 Fluid volume, als

3D Applications Primarily for complex reservoir conditions Multiple zones wit varyin elastic or leakoff properties Closure stress profiles indicate complex eometries Vertical fracture profile illustratin te canes in widt across te fracture

3D Components Assumptions 1. 3D stress distribution linear elastic beavior propaation criterion iven by fracture touness. D fluid flow in fracture laminar flow of newtonian or non-newtonian fluid 3. D proppant transport 4. Heat transfer 5. Leakoff Leakoff is 1D, to fracture face

3D Formulation Elliptic D.E. for elasticity Convective-diffusive eq. for eat transfer Parabolic D.E. for leakoff Solution Finite element metod discretization of formation to solve for stresses and displacements Boundary interal metod discretization of boundary

3D Pseudo 3D models (P3D) Crack eit variations are approximate dependent on position and time 1D fracture fluid flow Similar to PKN, i.e., vertical planes deform independently D P3D 3D

3D Comparison to validate D models Example A: Stron stress barriers, neliible leakoff More examples in Capter 5 of SPE monorap Vol 1 3D simulator

Dynamic Fracture Propaation Desin PKN Model Includes effects of non-newtonian fluids and net-to-ross eit 1. Initial uess of maximum wellbore widt, w wb = 0.10 in.. Calculate te averae widt, w w 4 wb 3. Calculate te effective viscosity, e n1 80.84q 47880K i w 4. Calculate dimensionless time, 41 B 1.7737x10 e 5 3C q i G /3 5 n t D t B

Dynamic Fracture Propaation Desin Includes effects of non-newtonian fluids and net-to-ross eit 5. Calculate dimensionless widt, 0.1645 w D 0.78t D 6. Calculate te maximum wellbore widt, 7. Test for converence, 161 q e 5.078x10 e i C G w wb ew D n 1/3 PKN Model n w wb n1 w wb TOL YES Continue NO Go to step ) wit updated w wb.

Dynamic Fracture Propaation Desin Includes effects of non-newtonian fluids and net-to-ross eit 8. Calculate te fracture lent, 1. Calculate te fracture volume, 10. Calculate te fracture pressure 5 1 q a 7.4768x10 e i 8 4 56C G.695 L D 0.5809t D L al D w L V 1 n 1/3 8 PKN Model P f (0,t) 1/ 4 3 0.0975 G q i e L 1 3,min 11. Update pumpin time and repeat te procedure, startin at step 1).

Dynamic Fracture Propaation Desin GDK Model 1. Initialize te procedure by uessin w wb = 0.1 in.. Calculate te dimensionless fluid loss parameter and fracture lent, n sp 8V 1 we w n t 8C L ) ( 1 8 1 0.11168 L erfc L e L n sp V we w n i q C L 3. Averae widt, wb w 4 w 4. Calculate te effective viscosity, 1 n w i 80.84q 47880K e

Dynamic Fracture Propaation Desin GDK Model 5. Simplified expression for fracture widt, w wb 84(1 ) 0.195 e G q i L 1/ 4 6. Test for converence, n w wb n1 w wb TOL YES Continue NO Go to step ) wit updated w wb. 7. Volume of one win of te fracture, V Lw wb 48 8. Bottomole fracture pressure,

wb wb Stimulation YES Continue NO Go to step ) wit updated w wb. 7. Volume of one win of te fracture, Dynamic Fracture Propaation Desin V Lw wb 48 GDK Model 8. Bottomole fracture pressure, P f (0, t) 1/ 4 3 3 0.0375 G q i e 1 3 L,min 9.Update pumpin time and repeat te procedure, startin at step 1).

Nomenclature a = lent constant, ft. B = time constant, min. C = fluid loss coefficient, ft/(min) 1/ E = widt constant, in. G = sear modulus, psi n = ross fracture eit, ft. = net permeable sand tickness, ft. K = consistency index, (lbf-sec n )/ft L = fracture lent, ft. L D P f q i t t D = dimensionless fracture lent = bottomole fracture pressure, psi = flow rate into sinle win of fracture, bpm = pumpin time, min. = dimensionless time V = volume of sinle win, ft 3 V sp = spurt loss, ft 3 /ft w = volumetric averae fracture widt, in. L D P f q i = dimensionless fracture lent = bottomole fracture pressure, psi = flow rate into sinle win of fracture, bpm t = pumpin time, min. t D = dimensionless time V = volume of sinle win, ft 3 V sp = spurt loss, ft 3 /ft w = volumetric averae fracture widt, in. w D w wb w we L e = dimensionless fracture widt = fracture widt at wellbore, in. = fracture widt at wellbore at end of pumpin, in. = dimensionless fluid-loss parameter includin spurt loss = effective fracture fluid viscosity, cp = orizontal, minimum stress, psi = poisson s ratio