Development of Optimum Design Method for the Heat Recovery Ground Source Heat Pump System

Similar documents
PROPOSED SOLUTION - ASSIGNMENT 5

EVALUATION METHOD OF GROUND WATER VELOCITY APPLYING THE GRADIENT OF THERMAL RESPONSE

Modeling of Vertical Ground Loop Heat Exchangers with Variable Convective Resistance and Thermal Mass of the Fluid

Analytical Studies of the Influence of Regional Groundwater Flow by on the Performance of Borehole Heat Exchangers

NEGST. New generation of solar thermal systems. Advanced applications ENEA. Comparison of solar cooling technologies. Vincenzo Sabatelli

Net Export Rule 1 : Deriving the generation value of storage device G(t)

IMPROVEMENTS OF THERMAL RESPONSE TESTS FOR GEOTHERMAL HEAT PUMPS

DESIGN & DEVELOPMENT OF COMBINED UNIT FOR AN AIR CONDITIONING & REFRIGERATION AND SIMULATION OF SYSTEM

An investigation on thermal interaction coefficient for multiple borehole heat exchangers

EXPERIENCE FROM THE FIRST THERMAL RESPONSE TEST (TRT) EQUIPMENT IN FINLAND. N. Leppäharju, I. Martinkauppi, M. Nousiainen

Long-Term Performance of Borehole Heat Exchanger Fields with Groundwater Movement

Lecture 38: Vapor-compression refrigeration systems

1/54 Circulation pump, safety valve, expansion vessel

Analytical Modelling of Short-term Response of Ground Heat Exchangers in Ground Source Heat Pump Systems

Biological Process Engineering An Analogical Approach to Fluid Flow, Heat Transfer, and Mass Transfer Applied to Biological Systems

1. DEFINITIONS. B. BTUH Hourly Rate of change in Mass Heat BTUH = * CFM * ΔT (Air Heat Transfer) BTUH = 500 * GPM * ΔT (Water Heat Transfer)

Principles of Food and Bioprocess Engineering (FS 231) Problems on Heat Transfer

A generic adsorption heat pump model for system simulations in TRNSYS

Ben Wolfe 11/3/14. Figure 1: Theoretical diagram showing the each step of heat loss.

IDEA Campus Energy 2016

BACK TO BASICS: PIPE INSULATION

Tecnomatix Plant Simulation Worldwide User Conference 2016 FLEXIBILIZATION STUDY OF MATERIAL AND ENERGY FLOWS IN MINING

Application of Real-Time Rainfall Information System to CSO control. 2 October 2011 Naruhito Funatsu METAWATER Co., Ltd.

SHAWN NAYLOR. Research Hydrogeologist Center for Geospatial Data Analysis, Indiana Geological Survey

PROPOSED SOLUTION - ASSIGNMENT 3

INSTRUCTOR: PM DR MAZLAN ABDUL WAHID

Battery Energy Storage

Effective Borehole Thermal Resistance of A Single U-Tube Ground Heat Exchanger

Design of a Refrigerator. Department of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering. Abdallah Soliman. Masih Ahmed. Ryan Seballos. EMAE 355 Project 4

Electrical Power Cables Part 2 Cable Rating Calculations

Opportunities for Geothermal Development Created by New Technologies S2-1-2

S O M A M O H A M M A D I 13 MARCH 2014

Thermal Unit Operation (ChEg3113)

Basic Principles of an Adsorption Heat Storage System

Numerical Evaluation of Long-Term Performance of Borehole Heat Exchanger Fields

ton Nonlinear Programming of Field and Plant Vegetable Processing Activities By Robert H. Reed and James N. Boles

Phone: , For Educational Use. SOFTbank E-Book Center, Tehran. Fundamentals of Heat Transfer. René Reyes Mazzoco

Portland Water Bureau. Preparing Portland s Water Supply for The Big One. July 11, Tim Collins, P.E., G.E.

Laird Thermal Systems Application Note. Precise Temperature Control for Medical Analytical, Diagnostic and Instrumentation Equipment

Pilot applications for Egypt related end-users

Congestion Management in a Smart Grid via Shadow Prices

Rotary Drilling Rotary Drilling Bits

Nonequilibrium unsteady thermodynamic and spatio-temporal properties of ground source heat pumps

EMPIRICAL MODEL OF A 11 kw (NOMINAL COOLING) R134a WATER-WATER HEAT PUMP

Delta T Mitigation Strategies Tested on MIT Hayden AHU s. Outline

Modelling of Primary Frequency Control and Effect Analyses of Governing System Parameters on the Grid Frequency. Zhixin Sun

Instructional Objectives

Wind Generation Curtailment Reduction based on Uncertain Forecasts

FUNDAMENTALS OF HVAC

The DC Optimal Power Flow

Thermodynamics I Spring 1432/1433H (2011/2012H) Saturday, Wednesday 8:00am - 10:00am & Monday 8:00am - 9:00am MEP 261 Class ZA

Chapter 5. Mass and Energy Analysis of Control Volumes. by Asst. Prof. Dr.Woranee Paengjuntuek and Asst. Prof. Dr.Worarattana Pattaraprakorn

Investigations on Performance of an Auto-Cascade Absorption Refrigeration System Operating with Mixed Refrigerants

CONTRIBUTION TO IMPROVING THE PERFORMANCE COEFFICIENT OF A SOLAR ABSORPTION REFRIGERATION SYSTEM

CHAPTER 3 SHELL AND TUBE HEAT EXCHANGER

Peltier Application Note

A thermal conductivity estimation model applicable to Korean weathered granite soils

Summary for TEP 4215 E&P/PI

DESIGN OF INDIRECT-TRANSFER (RUN-AROUND-COILSYSTEM) HEAT EXCHANGERS

Assuming that all items produced are sold, find the cost C as a function of the price p.

Overall Heat Transfer Coefficient

Ocean Thermal Energy Stirling Power Plant (OTE-SPP)

Parametric Study on the Dynamic Heat Storage Capacity of Building Elements Artmann, Nikolai; Manz, H.; Heiselberg, Per Kvols

Pumped Thermal Exergy Storage Past, Present and Future

8.1 Technically Feasible Design of a Heat Exchanger

1. INTRODUCTION TO REFRIGERATION AND AIR CONDITION

International Journal of Advanced Engineering Technology E-ISSN

IBL. Design of Geothermal Heat Source Systems for Heating and Cooling Applications

DIMACS, Rutgers U January 21, 2013 Michael Caramanis

Theoretical and experimental studies on a latent heat thermal energy storage system (LHTES) containing flat slabs of phase change materials

Comparative study of Different Geometry of Ribs for roughness on absorber plate of Solar Air Heater -A Review

Research on Calculation Method of Power Supply Radius Based on Voltage Deviation in Rural Power Network. Ning Wang

FINITE TIME THERMODYNAMIC EVALUATION OF IRREVERSIBLE ERICSSON AND STIRLING HEAT PUMP CYCLES

Heat Exchangers for Condensation and Evaporation Applications Operating in a Low Pressure Atmosphere

Common Terms, Definitions and Conversion Factors

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. especially in last 50 years. Industries, especially power industry, are the large anthropogenic

MPC-D403 MPC-D404. Ultra-small Peltier Coolers. High impedance Low control current High power efficiency

The correct citation for this paper is:

ANALYTICAL AND NUMERICAL MODELING OF FOUNDATION HEAT EXCHANGERS LU XING. Huazhong University of Science & Technology. Wuhan, China

Section 2. Energy Fundamentals

Optimal Demand Response

Power Engineering II. Fundamental terms and definitions

Analysis of pumped heat energy storage (PHES) process using explicit exponential matrix solutions (EEMS)

Willkommen. Welcome. Bienvenue. Ventilation energy efficiency of fans and drives Energy recovery and energy efficiency in ventilation technology

Predicting the Electricity Demand Response via Data-driven Inverse Optimization

Research on Performance of Ground-Source Heat Pump Double U Underground Pipe Heat Exchange

Advanced heat driven hybrid refrigeration and heat pump systems. Z. Tamainot-Telto School Engineering University of Warwick Coventry CV4 7AL - UK)

Radiant Heating Panel Thermal Analysis. Prepared by Tim Fleury Harvard Thermal, Inc. October 7, 2003

Finite-Element Evaluation of Thermal Response Tests Performed on U-Tube Borehole Heat Exchangers

SOLAR POWER FORECASTING BASED ON NUMERICAL WEATHER PREDICTION, SATELLITE DATA, AND POWER MEASUREMENTS

GEOG 402. Soil Temperature and Soil Heat Conduction. Summit of Haleakalā. Surface Temperature. 20 Soil Temperature at 5.0 cm.

Development of a prototype system for seasonal solar heat storage using an open sorption process

Transient Stability Assessment of Synchronous Generator in Power System with High-Penetration Photovoltaics (Part 2)

Comparison of Heat Transfer rate of closed loop micro pulsating heat pipes having different number of turns

Parametric study of irreversible Stirling and Ericsson cryogenic refrigeration cycles

THE DUCT GROUND HEAT STORAGE MODEL (DST) FOR TRNSYS USED FOR THE SIMULATION OF HEAT EXCHANGER PILES.

DESIGNING FOR DOWNDRAG ON UNCOATED AND BITUMEN COATED PILES

Borehole Description

Mathematical modelling of devices and flows in energy systems

Transcription:

12 th IEA Heat Pump Conference May 18 th, 2017, Rotterdam, Netherland Development of Optimum Design Method for the Heat Recovery Ground Source Heat Pump System Takao KATSURA Faculty of Engineering, Graduate School of Hokkaido University

Today s Contents (1) What is the heat recovery ground source heat pump (HR-GSHP) system? 1) Outlines and advantages 2) Applications 1 (2) Design method for the HR-GSHP system by using optimization method 1) Design process of HR-GSHP system and basic concept of the design 2) Determination method of the thermal load of each GSHP unit in the HR-GSHP system by using optimization method (3) Feasibility study of installing the HR-GSHP system using the design method 1) Outlines of subject building and calculation condition 2) Determined thermal load of the HR-GSHP system 3) Temperature variation of heat carrier fluid in the HR-GSHP system 4) Installation effect of the HR-GSHP system

Introduction 2 What is the HR-GSHP system? Outlines- Heating demand Heating demand Cooling demand Supply header Return header GHEX

Introduction 3 What is the HR-GSHP system? Application- Large complex building Restaurant Hotel Hotel Hotel Hotel Hotel Office Office Office Office Office Restaurant Retail store Retail store Retail store Retail store Example of hourly thermal load in annual

Introduction 4 What is the HR-GSHP system? Application- Large complex building

Introduction 5 What is the HR-GSHP system? Application- Food productive process Cold storage Casting Seasoning Drying Vaporing Cooling Packing Heating Sterilization Cooling Shipment Cold water Vapor Cold water Tap water GSHP GSHP Boiler Pre-heated water GSHP GHEX

Introduction 6 What is the HR-GSHP system? Application- Thermal grid system

7 Design method for the HR-GSHP system by using optimization method

Design process of HR-GSHP system and basic concept of the design 8 Concept diagram of HR-GSHP system Basic design concept 1. The GSHP units are operated by priority 2. The GSHP s total heat load are maximized by using the two heat recovery effects

Determination method of the thermal load of each GSHP unit 9 Flow of design method Example of Q ghr, i and Q gcr, j

Determination method of the thermal load of each GSHP unit 10 Flow of design method Example of hourly thermal load (top) and heat extraction (bottom)

Determination method of the thermal load of each GSHP unit 11 Flow of design method Simplifying hourly heat extraction

Determination method of the thermal load of each GSHP unit Optimizing the thermal load of each GSHP unit 12 ) *+, Objective function: J " = )-. Q &'( + )-. Q &'0 Maximized Evaluation variables: Q 234567, Q 284567 Constrains: A. 0 < Q 234567 Q 23456 Constrains by giving the total length Q 23456 = q = 23 L The genetic algorithm (GA) is 2ΔT 2448A 1000 of GHEX, heat extraction rate q applied for the optimization = 23, q B. 0 < Q 284567 Q = and allowable temperatures, 28456 method 28 because the objective Q 28456 = q = 28 L T 2ΔT 24456 1000 function 1inmax and lacked T 1inmin smoothness K *+, + and D KJG IJG Constrains was nonlinear of heat balance according between C. to heat the extraction evaluation and variables heat injection " FG*,I K.E *+, + " FGI,I KJG IJG.E D ) *+, Here, Q 23456 Q 28456 L 2 : Maximum value of GHEX s heat extraction Q pe [kw] : Maximum value of GHEX s heat injection Q pi [kw] q = 23, q= 28 : Heat extraction rate [W/m/K] (Explained later) : Total length of GHEX [m] ΔT 2448A : Maximum temperature variation for heat extraction [ o C] ΔT 24456 : Maximum temperature variation for heat injection [ o C]

Determination method of the thermal load of each GSHP unit Optimizing the thermal load of each GSHP unit Example of changing the evaluation variable and objective function 13 Q 23456 Q 234567 Q 234567 Q 28456 Q 284567 Q 284567 Q &. Q &. > Q 28456 Q &. Q 28456

Determination method of the thermal load of each GSHP unit Calculation of heat extraction rate 14 Example of hourly heat extraction Example of temperature variation of heat carrier fluid Q 23 ΔT 24456 T [ o C] ΔT 2448A Q 28 Elapsed time [h] Elapsed time [h] Heat extraction rate per length and temperature difference q [W/m/K] q = Q 2/L 2 ΔT 24

Determination method of the thermal load of each GSHP unit Calculation of heat extraction rate 15 Example of heat extraction rate per length and temperature difference

16 Feasibility study of installing the HR- GSHP system using the design method

Outlines of subject building and calculation condition Outlines of subject building and thermal load Large complex building 17 Restaurant Hotel Hotel Hotel Hotel Hotel Office Office Office Office Office Restaurant Retail store Retail store Retail store Retail store Example of hourly thermal load in annual

Outlines of subject building and calculation condition Outlines of HR-GSHP system and calculation condition 18 Heating capacity : 2,000 kw Cooling capacity : 1,200 kw Condition of soil property Initial ground temperature : 16.5 o C Heat capacity : 3,000 kj/m 3 /K Effective thermal conductivity : 1.5 W/m/K Single U-tube GHEX Depth: 100 m, 72 boreholes

Determined thermal load of the HR-GSHP system Comparison of thermal loads with the conventional GSHP system Thermal load of the HR-GSHP system Thermal load of the conventional GSHP system 19 Heating load for HR-GSHP system Heating load for HR-GSHP system Heating load for HR-GSHP system Cooling load for HR-GSHP system Cooling load for HR-GSHP system Cooling load for HR-GSHP system Cooling load for HR-GSHP system Total thermal load Heating load : 5,442 MWh Cooling load : 3,955 MWh Total thermal load Heating load : 1,303 MWh Cooling load : 883 MWh 4.3 times

Temperature variation of heat carrier fluid Comparison of temperature variations with the conventional GSHP system 20 Temperature variation of T 1in in the HR-GSHP system Temperature variation of T 1in in the conventional GSHP system

Installation effect of the HR-GSHP system Comparison of thermal loads and COPs with the conventional GSHP system 21

Summary (1) A design method applying the optimization method for the HR-GSHP system was introduced. By applying the design method, the total heating and cooling loads of each GSHP unit in the HR-GSHP system were maximized in response to an arbitrarily set GHEX total length. (2) Assuming that an HR-GSHP system is installed in a large scale complex building, the hourly heating and cooling loads of each GSHP unit were determined using the optimum design method. The results showed that the HR-GSHP could cover approximately 4.3 times of the heat load compared to a conventional GSHP system. (3) The average COPs for the HR-GSHP system were 4.6 for heating and 10.3 for cooling. Therefore, the HR-GSHP system also has the advantage of COP compared to the conventional GSHP system. 22

Thank you for your attention 23

Introduction 24 Ground source heat pump (GSHP) systems have gained attention in Japan since ground thermal energy was defined as one of the renewable energies in 2009. However in Japan there are few examples of large GSHP system with a total heating or cooling capacity of more than 500 kw. Heat recovery ground source heat pump (HR-GSHP) system have the potential to promote the installation of large GSHP system.

Introduction 25 What is the HR-GSHP system? Advantages- Direct heat recovery effect Example of hourly heat thermal extraction load rate Eliminated heat extraction (Blue) Heating load Cooling load Eliminated heat injection (Red)

Introduction 26 What is the HR-GSHP system? Advantages- Indirect heat recovery effect Hourly heat extraction rate (HR-GSHP (Conventional system) GSHP system) Temperature variation of heat carrier fluid (HR-GSHP (Conventional system) GSHP system) T [ o C] Elapsed time [h]

Design process of HR-GSHP system and basic concept of the design 27 Necessity of optimization method for design process Diagram of design process for the conventional GSHP system Diagram of design process for the HR-GSHP system However, Design tool it for is required the GSHP tosystem handle the heat loads of several types of heat pumps. The number of variable increases The optimization method is required to determine the heat loads Introduced HPC2005 Las Vegas

Installation effect of the HR-GSHP system Comparison of electric power consumption with the conventional GSHP system 28 40 %

Design process of HR-GSHP system and basic concept of the design 29 Concept diagram of HR-GSHP system We assume the followings in the modeling 1. Heat gain and heat loss in the piping between the heat pump units and GHEXs 2. The total heat load Q 2,i is covered not only by the GSHP in HR-GSHP system but also by other heat source systems

Modeling of the HR-GSHP system 30 Concept diagram of HR-GSHP system We assume the followings in the modeling 1. Heat gain and heat loss in the piping between the heat pump units and GHEXs 2. The total heat load Q 2,i is covered not only by the GSHP in HR-GSHP system but also by other heat source systems

Modeling of the HR-GSHP system 31 Concept diagram of HR-GSHP system (1) Calculation of total thermal load of GSHP units Heating load Cooling load Q &'( = O Q &'(,8 (If the heat pump unit i=1 supplies heating, the heating load of the heat pump unit i=1 is added to the heating side) Example of hourly Q g2h, Q g2c A 8-. A Q &'0 = O Q &'0,8 8-. Q [kw] Q g2h (Q g2 ) Q g2c (Negative side of Q g2 )

Modeling of the HR-GSHP system 32 Concept diagram of HR-GSHP system Here, (2)Calculation of total heat extraction rate of GSHP units Heat extraction (Heating) Heat Injection (Cooling) Q &.3,8 = Q &'(,8 Q &'(,8 /COP (,8 Q &.8,8 = Q &'0,8 Q &'0,8 /COP 0,8 A Q &.3 = O Q &.3,8 8-. A Q &.8 = O Q &.T,8 8-. Example of hourly Q g1e, Q g1i Q [kw] Q g1e (Q g1 ) Q g1i (Negative side of Q g1 )

Modeling of the HR-GSHP system Concept diagram of HR-GSHP system (3) Calculation of GHEXs heat extraction rate Q 2 = Q &. = Q &.3 Q &.3 33 Example of calculation Q p Q g1e (Eliminated, blue) Q g1 (Green) Q [kw] Q g1i (Eliminated, red) Q [kw] Q p = Q g1

Modeling of the HR-GSHP system 34 Concept diagram of HR-GSHP system (4) Calculation of temperature of heat carrier fluid The temperature variations ΔT pmmin and ΔT pmmax are calculated by applying the simplified following equation ΔT 2448A = Q 23456 1000 ( q = 23 L 2) T 24 = T 28A + T 2UV) 2 Here, ΔT 24456 = Q 28456 1000 ( q = 28 L 2) ΔT 2448A : Maximum temperature variation for heat extraction [ o C] ΔT 24456 : Maximum temperature variation for heat injection [ o C] Q 23456 Q 28456 : Total length of GHEX [m] L 2 : Maximum value of Q pe [kw] (Q pe is positive value of Q p ) : Maximum value of Q pi [kw] (Q pi is negative value of Q p ) q = 23, q= 28 : Heat extraction rate [W/m/K] (Explained later)

Modeling of the HR-GSHP system 35 Concept diagram of HR-GSHP system (4) Calculation of temperature of heat carrier fluid (continuation) The temperature T 1inmin (Minimum value of T 1in ) and T 1inmax (Maximum value of T 1in ) are calculated by the following equation T.8A48A = T [E ΔT 2448A + ΔT. /2 T.8A456 = T [E + ΔT 24456 ΔT. /2 Here, T [E ΔT. : Undisturbed ground temperature [ o C] : Temperature difference between T 1in and T 1out [ o C] (Generally 5 o C) We can predict the temperature variation

Design process of HR-GSHP system and basic concept of the design Basic design concept 36