SURFACE WAVE GROUP VELOCITY MEASUREMENTS ACROSS EURASIA

Similar documents
Mid-Period Rayleigh Wave Attenuation Model for Asia

SHORT PERIOD SURFACE WAVE DISPERSION FROM AMBIENT NOISE TOMOGRAPHY IN WESTERN CHINA. Sponsored by National Nuclear Security Administration 1,2

The use of crustal higher modes to constrain crustal structure across Central Asia

24th Seismic Research Review Nuclear Explosion Monitoring: Innovation and Integration

Ambient Noise Tomography in the Western US using Data from the EarthScope/USArray Transportable Array

Observations of long period Rayleigh wave ellipticity

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

Workshop on Geophysical Data Analysis and Assimilation

27th Seismic Research Review: Ground-Based Nuclear Explosion Monitoring Technologies

2008 Monitoring Research Review: Ground-Based Nuclear Explosion Monitoring Technologies

Global Models of Surface Wave Group Velocity

Surface Waves Analysis and Phenomenology

SEISMIC SURFACE WAVES IN A LATERALLY INHOMOGENEOUS EARTH

Surface wave focusing effects: Numerical modeling and statistical observations

EPICENTRAL LOCATION OF REGIONAL SEISMIC EVENTS BASED ON LOVE WAVE EMPIRICAL GREEN S FUNCTIONS FROM AMBIENT NOISE

Average shear-wave velocity structure of the Kamchatka peninsula from the dispersion of surface waves

COMPUTATION OF REGIONAL TRAVEL TIMES AND STATION CORRECTIONS FROM THREE-DIMENSIONAL VELOCITY MODELS

27th Seismic Research Review: Ground-Based Nuclear Explosion Monitoring Technologies

Peer Reviewed Publications

Rayleigh Wave Group Velocity Dispersion Across Northern Africa, Southern Europe and the Middle East

25th Seismic Research Review - Nuclear Explosion Monitoring: Building the Knowledge Base

Workshop on Geophysical Data Analysis and Assimilation

Advanced School on Direct and Inverse Problems of Seismology

Crust and upper mantle P- and S-wave delay times at Eurasian seismic stations

2008 Monitoring Research Review: Ground-Based Nuclear Explosion Monitoring Technologies

27th Seismic Research Review: Ground-Based Nuclear Explosion Monitoring Technologies

Travel time tomography of the uppermost mantle beneath Europe

29th Monitoring Research Review: Ground-Based Nuclear Explosion Monitoring Technologies MODELING P WAVE MULTIPATHING IN SOUTHEAST ASIA

Global surface-wave tomography

28th Seismic Research Review: Ground-Based Nuclear Explosion Monitoring Technologies

Supporting Online Material for

APPLICATION OF A GLOBAL 3D MODEL TO IMPROVE REGIONAL EVENT LOCATIONS

27th Seismic Research Review: Ground-Based Nuclear Explosion Monitoring Technologies

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

28th Seismic Research Review: Ground-Based Nuclear Explosion Monitoring Technologies

Contents of this file

Estimation of S-wave scattering coefficient in the mantle from envelope characteristics before and after the ScS arrival

ATTENUATION OF LG WAVES IN THE EASTERN TIBETAN PLATEAU. Jiakang Xie. Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory of Columbia University

2.1 Introduction. 16 Chapter2

27th Seismic Research Review: Ground-Based Nuclear Explosion Monitoring Technologies

Velocity structure of the continental upper mantle: evidence from southern Africa

29th Monitoring Research Review: Ground-Based Nuclear Explosion Monitoring Technologies

Tomographic imaging of P wave velocity structure beneath the region around Beijing

Minor-arc and major-arc global surface wave diffraction tomography

29th Monitoring Research Review: Ground-Based Nuclear Explosion Monitoring Technologies

Databases of surface wave dispersion

Continent-sized anomalous zones with low seismic velocity at the base of Earth s mantle

Bradley B. Woods and Chandan K. Saikia Woodward-Clyde Federal Services, Pasadena, CA. F C-0046 Sponsored by AFOSR ABSTRACT

620 C 2003 RAS. Geophys. J. Int. (2003) 152,

2011 Monitoring Research Review: Ground-Based Nuclear Explosion Monitoring Technologies

1. A few words about EarthScope and USArray. 3. Tomography using noise and Aki s method

A BROADBAND SEISMIC EXPERIMENT IN YUNNAN, SOUTHWEST CHINA. Sponsored by Defense Threat Reduction Agency. Contract No.

Middle and upper crust shear-wave velocity structure of the Chinese mainland

Contract No. F

Anisotropy in the Australasian upper mantle from Love and Rayleigh waveform inversion

ANEWJOINTP AND S VELOCITY MODEL OF THE MANTLE PARAMETERIZED IN CUBIC B-SPLINES

Some aspects of seismic tomography

Global geophysics and wave propagation

9th Workshop on Three-Dimensional Modelling of Seismic Waves Generation, Propagation and their Inversion

27th Seismic Research Review: Ground-Based Nuclear Explosion Monitoring Technologies

3D IMAGING OF THE EARTH S MANTLE: FROM SLABS TO PLUMES

Global variation of body wave attenuation in the upper mantle from teleseismic P wave and S wave spectra

Global surface wave diffraction tomography

New constraints on the arctic crust and uppermost mantle: surface wave group velocities, P n, and S n

Lateral variation of the D 00 discontinuity beneath the Cocos Plate

27th Seismic Research Review: Ground-Based Nuclear Explosion Monitoring Technologies

29th Monitoring Research Review: Ground-Based Nuclear Explosion Monitoring Technologies

The Earth s Structure from Travel Times

Relocation of a global earthquake data set with a 3-D velocity model

29th Monitoring Research Review: Ground-Based Nuclear Explosion Monitoring Technologies ENHANCEMENTS OF GEOPHYSICAL MODELS FOR MONITORING

What does Seismic Anisotropy tell us about the Lithosphere-Asthenosphere Boundary?

28th Seismic Research Review: Ground-Based Nuclear Explosion Monitoring Technologies

Imaging sharp lateral velocity gradients using scattered waves on dense arrays: faults and basin edges

Seismic interferometry with antipodal station pairs

2008 Monitoring Research Review: Ground-Based Nuclear Explosion Monitoring Technologies ADVANCED WAVEFORM SIMULATION FOR SEISMIC MONITORING

C3.4.1 Vertical (radial) variations in mantle structure

Surface-wave studies of the Australian region

24th Seismic Research Review Nuclear Explosion Monitoring: Innovation and Integration

High-precision location of North Korea s 2009 nuclear test

2008 Monitoring Research Review: Ground-Based Nuclear Explosion Monitoring Technologies

Broad-band ambient noise surface wave tomography across the United States

29th Monitoring Research Review: Ground-Based Nuclear Explosion Monitoring Technologies

Broad-band ambient noise surface wave tomography across the United States

The velocity structure of the crust and upper mantle under China from broad-band P and PP waveform analysis

G 3. AN ELECTRONIC JOURNAL OF THE EARTH SCIENCES Published by AGU and the Geochemical Society

Existence of finite rigidity layer at the base of the Earth s liquid outer core inferred from anomalous splitting of normal modes

Regional 3D velocity structure

PUBLICATIONS. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems

DEVELOPMENT OF AUTOMATED MOMENT TENSOR SOFTWARE AT THE PROTOTYPE INTERNATIONAL DATA CENTER

DEVELOPMENT OF AUTOMATED MOMENT TENSOR SOFTWARE AT THE PROTOTYPE INTERNATIONAL DATA CENTER

2 N.M. Shapiro and M.H. Ritzwoller of the corridor of models provides the uncertainty estimate. Uncertainty estimates allow the identication of the ro

Seismic evidence for widespread deep crustal deformation caused by extension in the western US

GEO-DEEP9300 Lithosphere and Asthenosphere: Composition and Evolution

Love and Rayleigh Wave Tomography of the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau and Surrounding Areas

28th Seismic Research Review: Ground-Based Nuclear Explosion Monitoring Technologies AN UPDATED EURASIAN CRUSTAL MODEL USING MULTIPLE SEISMIC METHODS

29th Monitoring Research Review: Ground-Based Nuclear Explosion Monitoring Technologies

Imaging Moho topography beneath the Alps by multdisciplinary seismic tomography

Lithospheric Tomography Structure Beneath Arabia using Surface Waves Group Velocities

High Resolution Surface Wave Tomography From Ambient Seismic Noise

29th Monitoring Research Review: Ground-Based Nuclear Explosion Monitoring Technologies

Transcription:

SURFACE WAVE GROUP VELOCITY MEASUREMENTS ACROSS EURASIA A. L. Levshin, M. H. Ritzwoller, and L. I. Ratnikova Department of Physics, University of Colorado at Boulder -Contract Number F49620-95-1-0139 Sponsored by AFOSR Abstract Earthquake and nuclear explosion data recorded by the GSN, GEOSCOPE, CDSN, and MED- NET broadband networks and the IRIS/Kyrghyz regional network (KNET) during 1988-1995 have been used to study the characteristics of surface wave propagation across Eurasia. More than 3500 three-component records for different epicenter - station pairs have been processed. Group and phase velocity dispersion curves, spectral amplitude curves, as well as frequency - dependent azimuthal particle - motion anomalies for fundamental Rayleigh and Love waves in the range of periods between about 20 and 300 s have been obtained by means of frequency-time analysis and floating filtering. Data on group velocities have been used to obtain preliminary group velocity maps of the region under study for a broad set of periods. Spatial resolution of these maps depends on the ray coverage, and appears to vary from 600 to 1000 km. Significant lateral variations of Rayleigh and Love group velocities seen on the maps indicate drastic changes of lithospheric shear velocity structure across the region. The Tibetan Plateau, the mountain regions of Central Asia, the Siberian Platform, the Indian Shield, as well as some smaller tectonic features, appear on maps as regions of relatively high or low group velocities. The 2D-inversion of all data into group velocity maps and 3D-inversion for the lithospheric structure of the region is in progress. key words: Eurasia, seismic wave propagation, Love waves, Rayleigh waves, group velocity, polarization 19960624 113 226

OBJECTIVE This research concentrates on making robust measurements of properties of surface waves propagating across Eurasia for periods ranging from 20 to 300 s, and on inverting the observations for elastic structures in the crust and upper mantle of Eurasia. Earthquake and nuclear explosion data recorded by several global and regional broadband networks and arrays in 1988-1995 are used to measure phase and group velocity dispersion, spectral amplitudes and polarization properties of fundamental Rayleigh and Love waves. Tomographic inversion of measurements into 2D-maps of observed wave parameters and 3D-elastic and anelastic structures should allow us to focus existing long-wavelength seismic models to tectonic wavelengths. Such models could be used to enhance the detection and location capabilities of seismic monitoring for complex tectonic regions of Eurasia. PRELIMINARY RESEARCH RESULTS Studies of the crustal and upper mantle structure of the Eurasian continent have a comparatively long history. Global tomographic models of Nataf et al. (1986), Woodhouse & Dziewonski (1989), Masters (1989), Su et al. (1994), Zhang & Tanimoto (1993) discovered the presence of significant long-wave lateral inhomogeneities in the Eurasian mantle. Inversion of body wave data for different regions of Eurasia was a subject of numerous papers (e.g., Vinnik & Ryaboy, 1981; Pavlenkova & Egorkin, 1983; Grand & Helmberger, 1985; Goldstein et al., 1992). Surface waves propagating across Eurasia have been analyzed by Nolet (1977), Patton (1980), Feng & Teng (1983), Lerner-Lam & Jordan (1983), Snieder (1988), Zielhuis & Nolet (1993), among others. These studies provided important information about the crustal and upper mantle structure of the continent as a whole and some of its parts. However, the recent dramatic increase in the number of broadband seismic stations deployed in Eurasia opens the opportunity to focus these models and obtain much more detailed 3D elastic and anelastic models of the continent. Of especial interest are the poorly studied regions of Northern, Central and Southern Asia. A natural subject for this scrutiny are surface waves propagating across the Eurasian continent. Data. Earthquake and nuclear explosion data recorded by the GSN, GEOSCOPE, CDSN, MEDNET broadband networks and the IRIS/Kyrghyz regional network (KNET) during 1988-1995 have been used to study the characteristics of surface wave propagation across Eurasia. Events with surface wave magnitude M, > 5.5 and source depth less than 100 km in and around Eurasia were selected for this purpose. All waveforms which passed quality control and related information were transformed into the CSS 3.0 relational database format before processing. The measurement techniques and data are described in more detail in a companion paper (Ritzwoller et al., 1995). More than 3500 three-component records for different epicenter - station pairs have been analyzed to date. Great circle wave paths corresponding to selected epicenter-station pairs are shown at Figure 1. Processing. Selected records were processed by means of a frequency-time analysis and floating filtering (Levshin et al., 1989, 1994; Ritzwoller et al., 1995). Results of measurements are group and phase velocity dispersion curves of fundamental Rayleigh and Love waves, socalled "cleaned" waveforms, corresponding to these waves, their amplitude spectra and frequencydependent azimuthal polarization anomalies. All these measurements are stored in an extension of the CSS 3.0 database system. Inversion. Group velocity observations were used for constructing preliminary group velocity maps for the region under study for a set of periods between 25 and 250 s with an increment of 25 s. The technique developed by Yanovskaya and Ditmar (1990), and applied to Central Asia group 227

velocity data by Wu & Levshin (1994), and Wu et al. (1995), was used for these purposes. This technique is based on a two-dimensional Backus-Gilbert formalism with some specific smoothness constrains. This method allows the estimation of the spatial resolution for a given path coverage of a studied region. Group velocity maps. About half of all group velocity measurements were used for preliminary 2D-inversion into group velocity maps. Some resulting maps for Rayleigh and Love waves are shown in Figures 2-7. Significant lateral variations of Rayleigh and Love wave group velocities seen on these maps indicate dramatic changes of lithospheric shear velocity structure across the region. The Tibetan Plateau, the mountain regions of Central Asia, the Siberian Platform, the Indian Shield, as well as some smaller tectonic features, appear on maps as regions of relatively low or high group velocities. The 2D-inversion of all data and 3D-inversion for lithospheric structure of the region is in progress. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Analysis of part of the surface wave data compiled from broadband seismological networks and arrays deployed in Eurasia during last 8 years shows a close relation between group velocity maps and tectonic regimes forming the Eurasian continent. We expect further significant improvement in the resolution of these maps when all available data will be used for inversion. We plan to concentrate our further efforts in the following directions: (1) Increase by a factor of 2 or 3 the amount of measurements by using the latest available data and continuing to lower the magnitude threshold for event selection. (2) Enhance and automate the quality control of measurements. (3) Estimate the internal consistency of group velocity maps by evaluating group time residuals between predicted and observed group arrival times. (4) Develop techniques for the 3D structural inversion of observed data, including group and phase velocities and polarization anomalies. (5) Apply these techniques for imaging different tectonic regimes forming Eurasia, with special attention to Central and Southern Asia. REFERENCES Feng, C-C., and T-L. Teng, 1983. Three-dimensional crust and upper mantle structure of the Eurasian continent. J. Geoph. Res., 88, 2261-2272. Goldstein, P., W. R. Walter, and G. Zandt, 1992. Upper mantle structure beneath Central Eurasia using a source array of nuclear explosions and waveforms at regional distances. J. Geoph. Res., 97, 14,097-14,113. Grand, S. P., and D. V. Helmberger, 1985. Uppermantle shear structure beneath Asia from multibounce S waves. Phys. of the Earth and Planet. Inter., 41, 154-169. Lerner-Lam, A. L., and T. J. Jordan,1983. Earth structure from fundamental and higher-mode waveform analysis. Geoph. J. R. Astron. Soc., 76, 759-797. Levshin, A. L., T. B. Yanovskaya, A. V. Lander, B. G. Bukchin, M. P. Barmin, L. I. Ratnikova, and E. N. Its, 1989. Seismic surface waves in a laterally inhomogeneous Earth, (ed. V. I. Keilis- Borok), Kluwer Publ., Dordrecht. Levshin, A. L., M. H. Ritzwoller, and L. I. Ratnikova, 1994. The nature and cause of polarization anomalies of surface waves crossing northern and central Eurasia. Geophys. J. Int., 117, 577-590. 228

Masters, G., 1989. Seismic modelling of the Earth's large-scale three-dimensional structure. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A, 328, 329-349. Nataf, H. C., I. Nakanishi, and D. L. Anderson, 1986. Measurement of mantle wave velocity and inversion for lateral heterogeneity and anisotropy. III. Inversion. J. Geophys. Res., 91, 7261-7307. Patton, H., 1980. Crust and upper mantle structure of the Eurasian continent from the phase velocity and Q of surface waves. Rev. Geophys. and Space Phys., 18, 605-625. Pavlenkova, N. I., and A. V. Egorkin, 1983. Upper mantle heterogeneity in the northern part of Eurasia. Phys. of the Earth and Planet. Inter., 33, 180-193. Ritzwoller, M. H., A. L. Levshin, S. S. Smith, and C. S. Lee, 1995. Making accurate continental broadband surface wave measurements. This Volume. Snieder, R., 1988. Large-scale waveform inversions of surface waves for lateral heterogeneity. 2. Application to surface waves in Europe and the Mediterranean. J. Geoph. Res., 93, 12,067-12,080. Su, W., R. L. Woodward, and A. M. Dziewonski, 1994. Degree-12 Model of shear velocity heterogeneity in the mantle. J. Geoph. Res., J. Geophys. Res., 99, 6945-6980. Vinnik, L. P., and V. Z. Ryaboy, 1981. Deep structure of the East European Platform according to seismic data. Physics of the Earth and Planet. Inter., 25, 27-37. Woodhouse, J. H., and A. M. Dziewonski, 1986. Seismic modelling of the Earth's large scale three-dimensional structure. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A, 328, 291-308. Wu, F. T., and A. Levshin, 1994. Surface-wave group velocity tomography of East Asia. Physics of the Earth and Planet. Inter., 84, 59-77. Wu, F. T., A. L. Levshin, and V. M. Kozhevnikov, 1995. Rayleigh wave group velocity tomography of Siberia, China and the Vicinity. Geoph. J. Int., in press. Yanovskaya, T. B., and P. G. Ditmar, 1990. Smoothness criteria in surface wave tomography. Geoph. J. Int., 102, 63-72. Zhang, Y.-S., and T. Tanimoto, 1993. High-resolution global upper mantle structure and plate tectonics. J. Geophys. Res., 98, 9793-9823. Zielhuis, A., and G. Nolet, 1993. Shear-wave velocity variations in the upper mantle beneath Central Europe. GeophysL. J.Int., 117, 695-715. 229

:."'....... :... -... Fi gr 1.. Sorc. Pats ue f Tomographic Inversion of Group Velocity Data. 230

Ivo. 100" 3.0 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.5 3.6 3.7 3.8 3.9 4.0 Figure 2. Rayleigh Wave Group Velocity for T=50 s. 231

' o. 30 100. oo" 3.45 3.55 3.60 3.65 3.70 3.75 3.80 3.85 3.90 3.95 4.05 Figure 3. Rayleigh Wave Group Velocity for T=75 s. 232

e~o o ~ looo C C 3.60 3.65 3.70 3.75 3.80 3.85 3.90 3.95 4.00 4.05 4.10 Figure 4. Rayleigh Wave Group Velocity for T=100 s. 233

6 0. 80 129 100' 3.50 3.55 3.60 3.65 3.70 3.75 3.85 Figure 5. Rayleigh Wave Group Velocity for T=200 s. 234

8o- 100 3.40 3.50 3160 3.70 3.80 3.90 4.00 4.05 4.10 Figure 6. Love Wave Group Velocity for T=50 s. 235

roo 8,100-80o- 10 ',0 4.00 4.10 4.20 4.30 4.40 4.45 4.50 4.55 Figure 7. Love Wave Group Velocity for T=100 s. 236