CHAPTER 107 DETERIORATION AND RESTORATION OF COASTAL WETLANDS

Similar documents
Unchain the River and Allow it to Build a Delta

MISSISSIPPI RIVER DELTA OVERVIEW

9 th INTECOL Orlando, Florida June 7, 2012

Optimal Design of Sediment Diversions for Delta Restoration: lessons learned from examples

Lab 12 Coastal Geology

PART 5 MECHANISMS OF GROUND SETTLEMENT IN GREATER NEW ORLEANS

PART 4 GEOLOGIC SETTING AND FOUNDATION CONDITIONS IN NEW ORLEANS

Name: Date: Class: Louisiana: Our History, Our Home Chapter 1: Louisiana s Geography - Section 2: Natural Regions Guided Reading

Coastal Litigation in the Context of Science Literacy

SEGMENTED BREAKWATERS AND THEIR USE IN COASTAL LOUISIANA

Wetland attenuation of Hurricane Rita s storm surge

Sediment Deposition LET THE RIVER RUN T E A C H E R. Activity Overview. Activity at a Glance. Time Required. Level of Complexity.

Mississippi River and Tributaries Project Mississippi River Geomorphology and Potamology Program

Sedimentation Dynamics and Stratigraphy of the Middle Breton Sound Estuary, Southeastern Louisiana: Spatiotemporal Evidence for Subdeltaic Evolution

L7/ Historical Perspec=ve, Deltas

THE IMPORTANCE OF SCIENCE IN COASTAL RESTORATION IN LOUISIANA

Subsidence and Silt:

GIS 2010: Coastal Erosion in Mississippi Delta

The Mississippi River Delta Basin and Why We are Failing to Save its Wetlands

KEY CONTROLS ON SEDIMENT BUDGETING IN THE MISSISSIPPI RIVER FROM SOURCE TO SINK

ΛTKINS. Applications of Regional Sediment Management Concepts in Texas Estuarine Restoration Projects. Riparian Workshop Fort Worth, October 17, 2012

Influence of the Major Drainages to the Mississippi River and Implications for System Level Management

Inter State Large Navigable Rivers of the United States

Earth Wind & Fire. Game Changing Restoration Options in the Texas Chenier Plain

Subtidal permanently flooded with tidal water. Irregularly exposed surface exposed by tides less often than daily

Types of Wetlands. Tidal Systems

The Geology of Sebago Lake State Park

MEMORANDUM FOR SWG

Holocene Lower Mississippi River Avulsions: Autogenic Versus Allogenic Forcing*

Regional-scale understanding of the geologic character and sand resources of the Atlantic inner continental shelf, Maine to Virginia

A Proposal to Create an Atlas of Surface Fault Traces in South Louisiana

Coastal Oceanography. Coastal Oceanography. Coastal Waters

West Galveston Bay Regional Sediment Management Plan (An Eco-geomorphologic Approach)

How Do Human Impacts and Geomorphological Responses Vary with Spatial Scale in the Streams and Rivers of the Illinois Basin?

Depositional Environment

Eco-hydromorphic Characterization of the Louisiana Coastal Region Using Multiple Remotely Sensed Data Sources and Analyses

Supplemental Slides. Shore: Junction of Land & Water. Junction of Land & Water. Sea Level Variations. Shore vs. Coast. Sea Level Variations

Shore: Junction of Land & Water. Sediments come off land Most get dumped at the beach Sediment interacts with ocean waves and currents

Sea Level Rise in Miami-Dade County Florida Implications for Management of Coastal Wetlands and the Everglades

Reducing Nitrogen Removal Uncertainty for Operation of Mississippi River Sediment Diversions: Nitrate Reduction Rates In Turbulent Flow Conditions

Chapter 3 Erosion in the Las Vegas Wash

Restoring the Mississippi River Delta for People and Wildlife: Recommended Projects and Priorities 1

Solutions to Flooding on Pescadero Creek Road

Sediment Management in the Coastal Bays

Design of Levee Breaches in Sheltered Water for Flood Risk Reduction & Marsh Restoration ASFMP; June 5, 2014 Presented By:

Coalbed Methane: Louisiana s Unexplored Energy Resource

Main issues of Deltas

CHAPTER FIVE: THE LOWER MISSISSIPPI REGION AND PLAQUEMINES PARISH

An analysis of storm surge attenuation by wetlands using USGS, FEMA, and NASA data

Wetland Sediment Dynamics at Crissy Field Marsh Annual Report

Appendix A STORM SURGE AND WAVE HEIGHT ANALYSIS

The Coast: Beaches and Shoreline Processes Trujillo & Thurman, Chapter 10

Surface Water and Stream Development

hingeline faults, as determined from sequential survey of benchmarks (Holdahl and Morrison 1974; Watson 1982).

Annual transport rates at two locations on the fore-slope.

The Mississippi River: Its Role in Restoration Efforts and Potential Effects of Climate Change

Developed in Consultation with Florida Educators

Altered morphodynamics in tidallyinfluenced rivers: re-thinking catchment management, flood risk & material fluxes

Planning for the Future of Humboldt Bay: Sea Level Rise, Sediment Management, Sand Spits and Salt Marshes. Joel Gerwein

The Coast: Beaches and Shoreline Processes

Vermont Stream Geomorphic Assessment. Appendix E. River Corridor Delineation Process. VT Agency of Natural Resources. April, E0 - April, 2004

EROSIONAL RATES IN THE POINT AUX CHENES BAY AREA, MISSISSIPPI: Kathleen P. Wacker G. Alan Criss INTRODUCTION

CAUSES FOR CHANGE IN STREAM-CHANNEL MORPHOLOGY

Understanding Oceans, Gulfs & Tides

Lab 7: Sedimentary Structures

Chapter 6, Part Colonizers arriving in North America found extremely landscapes. It looked different to region showing great.

e Southeast Region of the United Statesg

Long-Term Patterns of Coastal Response to Changing Land Use and Climate: Examples from the Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plains

Section 2.1 Ocean Basins. - Has helped determine where ocean basins are located. - Tectonic plates move changing the position of the continents.

Importance of Understanding Coastal Landforms

Moosehead Lake and the Tale of Two Rivers

Monitoring Coastal Marshes for Persistent Saltwater Intrusion

Carbon Sequestration Potential from Coastal Wetlands Restoration Sites

RESULTS FROM THE TEXAS COASTAL SEDIMENT SOURCES: A GENERAL EVALUATION STUDY

The United States & Canada. A Regional Study of Anglo America

Report on the Damage Survey Caused by Hurricane Katrina (Tentative Report)

Smooth Cordgrass Varieties. Description and Performance


Regional Sediment Management

2 Georgia: Its Heritage and Its Promise

Shallow marine facies. Outline 13: The Paleozoic World. Shallow marine and terrestrial facies

Bank Erosion and Morphology of the Kaskaskia River

Hurricane Tracks. Isaac versus previous storms Impacts and solutions. ( Continue by clicking on the slide bar to the right)

Upper Truckee River Restoration Lake Tahoe, California Presented by Brendan Belby Sacramento, California

Grade 8 Science. Unit 1: Water Systems on Earth Chapter 2

SHORELINE AND BEACH PROCESSES: PART 2. Implications for Coastal Engineering

FLUVIAL LANDFORMS. Floodplains

Year 6. Geography. Revision

Mapping the River as it Reconnects with Its Delta: Field Studies in Big Mar and Bohemia

What is weathering and how does it change Earth s surface? Answer the question using

Changes in Texas Ecoregions

AN ASSESSMENT OF RIVER RESOURCES FOR LOUISIANA COASTAL LAND PRESERVATION

Chapter 5. The Sedimentary Archives

Laboratory Exercise #4 Geologic Surface Processes in Dry Lands

Permafrost-influenced Geomorphic Processes

STUDY GUIDE FOR CONTENT MASTERY. Surface Water Movement

Seagrass Transplantation & Environmental & Marine Consulting Services, Inc. Drew Campbell, Vice President & Lead Scientst.

Visualizing hurricanes

L _*" I_

MARINE GEOLOGY & GEOGRAPHY

Transcription:

CHAPTER 107 DETERIORATION AND RESTORATION OF COASTAL WETLANDS By Sherwood M Gagliano Hyuck J Kwon Johannes L van Beek Coastal Studies Institute Louisiana State University Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70803 ABSTRACT Coastal Louisiana wetlands are a product of Mississippi River delta building that has occurred over a period of 5,000 years The building process was a gradual one, for riverine and marine processes were very nearly balanced In modern times man's use of the area (flood control, navigation improvement, exploitation of petroleum and other minerals, road building, etc ) has seriously altered the natural balance As a result, overbank flooding has been virtually eliminated and river flow is confined to channels discharging into the outer shelf area Most transported sediment is now deposited in the deep Gulf of Mexico or along the continental shelf Saltwater encroachment in the deltaic estuaries has been detrimental to fauna and flora Even though considerable sediment deposition has resulted from the historic Atchafalaya River diversion and growth of subdeltas, comparative map studies indicate a net land loss rate of 16 5 miles^/year during the last 25 to 30 years Land loss is only one symptom of general environmental deterioration A dynamic management plan is proposed for better utilization of combined freshwater discharge - dissolved solid and transported sediment input from the Mississippi River Controlled flow into estuaries will reduce salinity encroachment and supply badly needed nutrients Large areas of new marshland and estuarme habitat can be built by controlled subdelta diversion Studies of natural subdeltas indicate that these systems are amenable to environmental management, salinities and sediment deposition may be manipulated to enhance desired conditions INTRODUCTION Southern Louisiana is a 300-mile coastal lowland consisting of large tracts of marshes and swamps and innumerable lakes and bays This extensive near-sea-level area, estimated at 4,000,000 acres (O'Neil, 1949), makes up the deltaic plain and marginal components of the Mississippi River delta system and is the result of deposition of river sediment during the past 5,000 years (Fig 1) Like all deltas, that of the Mississippi is a zone of interactions between fluvial and marine processes and constitutes one of the most dynamic situations in nature The interaction of these processes through time results in a dynamically changing complex of environments within delta regions Deposition of sediments vies with subsidence and erosion m a never-ending exchange of land and 1767

1768 COASTAL ENGINEERING M Atchaf" 1 ~Miss' s " m > <D CO n 0 CO H 60 s SJ ft% a, CD CO 0 4J ^S rt J. a O J!\ ' \? CO w H '\ X >> CO U H cw CO CO H O +J n a th O CD f p. ti J.c'' 37 / T3 3 # =^ J 0) <D VJ H CO rh 4J 3 en,p ^ o 4J H ft 0 0 '^\. c u O 0} <D -u O* CO C 0 H CD p-'d a o 1 u p. O CD Z th CO < C B H >, OL 60.P 1 > 7 o V H U t ft 0) U U >.«t> CO 13 V ' O S3 <D < S3 O Q Jv^ V S 0) 4J CD ^ 3 CO T-i T3 cw d 3 CO >,th to 3 th CO ^ JJ 4J o th CO CD 0) TJ M T3 a H CO T3 0 H TH K CO CD CO /\ 0 > O CD ' ) H CO U / s os J U CO *? f H CD CD <v w _ p. 4J.3 p. 4J H CD CO ^ 3 CH CO CD O H O ) CO O ^-v / CO U C <«, 1 0 1 H CD H H CO CD rh th p..a CM rh <«, r-t CO t4 1 CD a V o a H th 60 ^ CO O U 4J CO C5 i 13 fll X& P. O 1H S H H O 60 U O O T3 n o a O CD O H n bot3 CO CO H a >> & p..p c So T) H H 01 /-s cfl O S *-> C H rh 60 3 CO CD H O CO T3 fh,p, ^

COASTAL WETLANDS 1769 water areas The balance between rates of deposition and the combined effects of subsidence and erosion by the sea causes shorelines of deltas alternately to advance seaward and to retreat Seaward growth occurs at the mouths of active streams, whereas erosion results near the mouths of inactive streams which no longer transport sufficient sediment to sustain their seaward advance This is the reason that delta building is so often depicted as a contest between the river and the sea If the river deposits sediment faster than the sea is able to remove it, new land is added to the shore, and the delta is said to prograde As the delta is extended, it gradually builds upward or aggrades by processes associated with lateral shifting of channels, by sediment deposition during overbank flooding, and by accumulation of plant and animal remains Under Natural Conditions DETERIORATION OF THE DELTAIC COAST Deterioration of the delta occurs if all or part of it is deprived of the necessary supply of river-borne sediment for its continued outward growth This deprivation results in the reworking and/or removal of the seaward edge by wave attack, and the combined effects of compaction, consolidation, and subsidence lower the surface below sea level Under natural conditions progradation along any given segment of the deltaic shoreline is cyclic During Recent geologic times southern Louisiana has witnessed development of numerous lobate extensions of the delta in areas of active discharge and sedimentation After building one delta lobe, the Mississippi channel usually has shifted as a result of upstream diversion, and a new lobe has been built Many repetitions of this process have produced a deltaic plain that is an aggregate of abandoned or inactive delta lobes, each of which has undergone a degree of deterioration dependant on its relative age Before the Mississippi occupied its present course, the river emptied its water and sediment discharge into shallow waters of the inner continental shelf, building lobes rapidly and efficiently Under these circumstances the rate of new land building was always higher than that of land loss occurring concurrently in abandoned delta lobes From the preceding discussion it might be concluded that when viewed through geologic time a delta system is always in delicate balance that is, on one side of the fulcrum there is an input of discharge and transported sediment and on the other side there are such factors as coastal erosion and subsidence, which cause shoreline retreat The very existence of south Louisiana bears witness to the fact that there has been net progradation over the past 5,000 years Man's Effect on the System Man's intervention in coastal Louisiana has seriously upset the natural balance in the delta system In modern years it has been necessary to alter natural processes in order to prevent flooding and to improve navigation As a result, virtually all overbank flow has been eliminated Furthermore, the modern birdfoot delta is nearing the edge of the continental shelf,

1770 COASTAL ENGINEERING and most transported sediments* are row disappearing into the abyss The river's attempt to divert to a new course that would allow development of a shallow-water delta lobe was aborted The well-known attempted capture of the Mississippi by the Atchafalaya River has now been arrested by control structures, and the Atcbaralaya is restricted to only 30 percent of the total Mi&sissippi florf (U S Army Corps of Engineers, 1951, Fisk, 1952) As a result of these control measures the amount of land building has been sharply reduced, but the rate of land loss m abandoned portions of the deltaic plain continues These restrictions in themselves would have serious repercussions, but other developments have caused further imbalance m the delta system Diking and drainage of marshland for agricultural purposes has been widespread and m many instances unsuccessful After drainage organic marsh soils oxidize and shrink, reducing the drained land surface to below-sealevel elevations Inundation by hurricane-generated storm surge has often resulted m abandonment, numerous rectangular lakes being left as mute testimony to land reclamation failure (Harrison, 1961) Equally serious has been the dredging of innumerable canals to provide access to oil well drilling sites and pipeline right-of-ways These invariably alter circulation patterns in the estuaries, resulting in a general saltwater encroachment of the brackish swamps and marshes Map Studies of Land Loss A fundamental question posed for this investigation, therefore, was, "Is the delta, and for that matter the coastal area on the whole, building or retreating 7 " The question has been approached by a number of workers (Morgan and Larimore, 1957, Treadwell, 1955, Kwon, 1969, Saucier, 1963, Russell, 1936, Peyronnm, 1962, Welder, 1959), who cited specific instances of shoreline advance or retreat However, it has long been a common misconception that erosion occurring along some parts of the Louisiana coast is more than offset by the building of new land m other areas We have attempted to reevaluate this problem by quantitative map studies, we used the ratio of land to water m a given sample area as an index of net loss or gain of land Fortunately, systematic planimetric mapping of coastal Louisiana was initiated in the 1890's by the D S Geological Survey In the 1930's this area was remapped, and use was made of controlled aerial photomosaics Mapping and remapping have continued since the 1940's, so that at present most of the 15-mmute quadrangle areas have been covered at least twice An example of changes that occurred m one small area between 1935 and 1953 is shown in Figure 2 This careful periodic remapping has made it possible to determine the ratio of land to water for a particular area and mapping interval, these values in turn can easily be converted into land loss or gain in acres per year The map shown in Figure 3 was constructed by contouring the land loss or gain rate obtained for each 7 1/2-minute quadrangle From the map several things are immediately apparent As indicated by the patterns, most of the deltaic plain is m a serious condition of deterioration During the last 30 to 40 years land gain has been significant m only a few areas (notably m the lacustrine deltas of the Atchafalaya Basin) Areas of maximum loss generally occur inland from the Gulf shore, where brackish

COASTAL WETLANDS 1771 Bay \ ij Champagne 0 1935 Fig 2 Land loss and shoreline change in the area covered by the Belle Pass quadrangle, south central Louisiana, 1935-1953 Several types of changes have occurred A, B, and C, Gulf shoreline retreat, D, washover fan development downdrift of retreating shoreline, E, marsh opening

1772 COASTAL ENGINEERING

COASTAL WETLANDS 1773 and fresh marshes are being subjected to saltwater intrusion (Chabreck, 1970, Palmisano, 1970) Subsidence is also undoubtedly a factor, as radiocarbon datmgs of buried marsh peats indicate that these are also areas of high subsidence rates (Coleman and Smith, 1964, Frazier and Osanik, 1969) The net land loss figures are most impressive For the coastal Louisiana wetlands the land loss amounts to approximately 16 1/2 square miles per year (Gagliano and van Beek, 1970) This is an average for the last 25 to 30 years The rates of change of land-to-water ratios established for each 7 1/2-minute quadrangle map can be analyzed m a number of ways One technique involves projection of the rates to establish land-water ratios for specific years within and beyond the period of map coverage Although such projections are based on the assumption that rates of change remain constant, the approach has some validity as a tool for prediction The map presented m Figure 4 depicts successive positions of the 50 percent land-water isopleth m the Mi«sissippi deltaic plain for the years 1930, 1970, and 2000 The lines were constructed by determining land-water ratios for each 7 1/2-mmute quadrangle for each year indicated Values were plotted at quadrangle center points, and contours were drawn on the basis of the points The 50 percent land-water line was selected as an index for analyzing the rate of land deterioration along the highly indented and irregular deltaic coast The map indicates a progressive landward march of this line across the area The predicted position of the line m the year 2000 aids m identifying the most critical areas of deterioration Major estuaries are clearly undergoing rapid and drastic changes Within the estuaries the landward retreat of the line implies increases m both salinity and volume of the tidal prism Areas of Active Sediment Deposition PROSPECTS FOR COASTAL RESTORATION The earlier discussion has attempted to define the symptoms of a disease, what are the prospects of a cure' The key is obviously to be found in those areas where land gain is occurring For example, the Atchafalaya River the Mississippi's only major distributary is actively building a lacustrine delta (U S Army Corps of Engineers, 1951, Fisk, 1952) During the past 50 years Atchafalaya sediments have filled a series of large lakes, and the river is expected to construct a delta lobe into the Gulf within the next few decades In the active delta, where one might anticipate the highest rates of land building, an anomalous situation exists As shown in Figure 5, approximately 75 percent of the total river flow and an equal proportion of transported sediment are discharged through four major outlets or passes As previously mentioned, and as shown m the figure, the mouths of these major passes lie m close proximity to deep water Consequently, most of the sediment transported by the Mississippi is simply dumped into the deep

1774 COASTAL ENGINEERING i-i c

COASTAL WETLANDS 1775 Fig 5 Relative sediment discharge and land accretion in the active birdfoot delta of the Mississippi River Gulf, and there is little accretion of new land In sharp contrast to the major passes, the 25 percent of river flow and transported sediment discharged through minor outlets has built a considerable landmass during historic times This landmass is shown as subdelta accretion in Figure 5 From the standpoint of land building, then, these minor outlets, related to subdeltas, are of primary interest Subdeltas, which are appendages of major delta lobes, are usuallyactive for periods of 50 to 100 years As illustrated in Figures 5 and 6, much of the landmass of the lower delta has been constructed by such subdeltas during historic times The dates shown in Figure 6 indicate the time of subdelta initiation Prior to their development these areas were occupied by embayments Comparative map studies reveal that the subdeltas account for over 80 percent of the new land built m the active delta during historic times One of the most interesting aspects of subdeltas is their cyclic nature that is, during a period of 50 to 100 years they progress through a sequence of stages dictated by interaction of such factors as stream gradient, subsidence, and vegetation change (Welder, 1959, Coleman and Gagliano, 1964, Morgan, 1970) Figure 7 traces the life cycle of the

COASTAL ENGINEERING Fig 6 Subdeltas of the modern birdfoot delta Dates indicate year of crevasse breakthrough (After Coleman and Gagliano, 1964 ) Garden Island Bay subdelta, as expressed by the gradual land area Note that this subdelta was initiated by a in the natural levee of one of the major distributaries through a short initial stage of subaqueous development when it started to increase in area rapidly During th subaenal growth land was added at an average rate of 0 Map measurements indicate that by 1940 the subdelta had 30 square miles of land, utilizing less than 3 percent of the river gain and loss of crevasse or break in 1891 It went until around 1900, is stage of fast 75 miles 2 /year built more than of the total flow Since 1940 the Garden Island Bay subdelta has been in a stage of

COASTAL WETLANDS 1777 Fig 7 Progressive development of the Garden Island Bay subdelta after the crevasse breakthrough in 1891 Maps from U S C G S navigation charts deterioration and has progressively decreased in land area as a consequence of subsidence and coastal erosion This example clearly illustrates the relative rapidity of geological processes associated with subdelta building and deterioration and suggests that subdeltas are highly amenable to manipulation Controlled diversions which will create new subdeltas are believed to be part of the solution to the environmental problem m coastal Louisiana A study correlating subdelta growth with sediment input has been conducted to provide a basis for estimating the likely effectiveness of controlled diversions of river flow in creating new land This study centered on the four major historic subdeltas (indicated as C, D, E, and F in Fig 6) The average growth rate for the four subdeltas was found to be 0 7 square mile per year, using 5 percent of the total flow (Sporadic discharge measurements have been made in the major subdelta channels by the New Orleans District, U S Army Corps of Engineers ) The efficiency of sediment retention ranged from about 50 to over 90

1778 COASTAL ENGINEERING percent, and the average rate of retention was 70 percent Controlled Diversions Seven potential sites for the creation of new subdeltas have also been identified and evaluated three east of the Mississippi and four to the west (Fig 8) Assuming a configuration and size similar to one of the smaller modern subdeltas, average depth and volume for each of the proposed diversion sites have been determined Long-term measurements indicate that the average sediment load of the Mississippi is 300 million tons per year If a 70 percent sediment retention efficiency figure for subdelta deposition is used, our data show that the river would be capable of building 12 3 square miles of new land per year if diversions were to be initiated along the lower reaches This is about 75 percent of the current net annual land loss of 16 5 square miles per year Thus it might be concluded that reestablishment of dynamic equilibrium in the Mississippi deltaic plain can only be approached However, other aspects of our studies indicate that relatively small volumes New Orleans Fig 8 Suggested locations for controlled subdeltas and freshwater input canal m southeastern Louisiana

COASTAL WETLANDS 1779 of fresh water introduced into the upper ends of mterdistnbutary estuary systems could be used to offset salinity intrusion and introduce badly needed nutrients, both of which would offset conditions leading to rapid deterioration of brackish and fresh marshes (see Fig 8) Such a dynamic management plan would have a number of benefits 1 The trend of land loss could be reversed, 2 Extension of the landmass would provide a valuable buffer zone for reducing hurricane-generated storm surges, 3 A highly irregular subdelta coast with maximum length of 3andsea interface could be created, which would enhance productivity of fisheries and wild life, 4 Judicious spacing of controlled subdeltas could create new estuaries and increase the total areas of existing ones During early settlement and initial utilization of the Mississippi valley and delta it was absolutely essential to prevent annual flooding and to improve navigation Accomplishment of these tasks has made possible the unprecedented growth and development that south Louisiana is experiencing today However, we have entered an era of total utilization of the Mississippi delta system Because of the delicate natural balance associated with the delta, it is mandatory that a new long-term dynamic management plan be devised for orderly development and use of the area It is the aim of our present studies to contribute to that goal ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The Coastal Studies Institute, Louisiana State University, is supported by the Geography Programs, Office of Naval Research, under Contract N00014-69-A-0211-0003, NR 388 002 This study was funded by the Department of the Army, New Orleans District, Corps of Engineers, Contract No DACW 29-69-C-0092 The authors gratefully acknowledge the cooperation of personnel of the New Orleans District Office m providing data and guidance

1780 COASTAL ENGINEERING REFERENCES Chabreck, R H, 1970, Marsh zones and vegetative types m the Louisiana coastal marshes Ph D Dissertation, Dept Botany and Plant Pathology, La State Univ, Baton Rouge Coleman, J M, and S M Gagliano, 1964, Cyclic sedimentation in the Mississippi River deltaic plain Trans Gulf Coast Assoc Geol Soc, 14 67-80 Coleman, J M, and W G Smith, 1964, Late Recent rise of sea level Bull Geol Soc Am, 75 833 Fisk, H N, 1952, Geological investigation of the Atchafalaya basin and the problem of Mississippi River diversion U S Corps of Engineers Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, Miss, 145 pp Frazier, D E, and A Osanik, 1969, Recent peat deposits Louisiana coastal plain In (E C Dapples and M E Hopkins, eds ) Environments of coal deposition, Geol Soc Am Spec Paper 114, pp 63-83 Gagliano, S M, and J L van Beek, 1970, Geologic and geomorphic aspects of deltaic processes, Mississippi delta system In (S M Gagliano, R Muller, P Light, and M Al-Awady) Hydrologic and geologic studies of coastal Louisiana, La State Univ, Coastal Studies Institute and Dept of Marine Sciences, vol I, 140 pp Harrison, R W, 1961, Alluvial empire Arkansas (Pioneer Press) Kwon, H J, 1969, Barrier islands of the northern Gulf of Mexico coast sediment source and development La State Univ, Coastal Studies Series No 24, 51 pp Morgan, J P, 1970, Deltas A resume J Geologic Education, XVIII(3) 107-117, and P B Larimore, 1957, Changes m the Louisiana shoreline Trans Gulf Coast Assoc Geol Soc, 7 303-310 O'Neil, Ted, 1949, The muskrat in the Louisiana coastal marshes La Dept Wildlife and Fisheries Commission Tech Report, 28 pp Palmisano, A W, 1970, Plant community-soil relationships in Louisiana coastal marshes Ph D dissertation, Dept Botany and Plant Pathology, La State Univ, Baton Rouge Peyronnin, C A, Jr, 1962, Erosion of Isles Dernieres and Timbalier Islands J Waterways and Harbors Div, Am Soc Civil Engrs, No WW1, pp 57-69

COASTAL WETLANDS 1781 Russell, R J, 1936, Physiography of the Lower Mississippi River Delta La Dept Conservation Geol Bull 8, pp 3-199 Saucier, R I, 1963, Recent geomorphic history of the Pontchartrain basin, Louisiana La State Univ, Coastal Studies Series No 9, 114 pp Treadwell, R C, 1955, Sedimentology and ecology of southeast coastal Louisiana La State Univ, Coastal Studies Institute Tech Report No 6, 78 pp U S Army Corps of Engineers, 1951, The Atchafalaya River study Mississippi River Commission, Vicksburg, Miss, vol 1, 47 pp Welder, F A, 1959, Processes of deltaic sedimentation in the Lower Mississippi River La State Univ, Coastal Studies Institute Tech Report No 12, 90 pp