Suriname. January About this Report and the World Database on Protected Areas (WDPA)

Similar documents
Bahamas. January About this Report and the World Database on Protected Areas (WDPA)

Ghana. January About this Report and the World Database on Protected Areas (WDPA)

Belize. January About this Report and the World Database on Protected Areas (WDPA)

Fiji. January About this Report and the World Database on Protected Areas (WDPA)

South Africa. January About this Report and the World Database on Protected Areas (WDPA)

Tanzania. January About this Report and the World Database on Protected Areas (WDPA)

Ethiopia. January About this Report and the World Database on Protected Areas (WDPA)

Cook Islands. January About this Report and the World Database on Protected Areas (WDPA)

Vanuatu. January About this Report and the World Database on Protected Areas (WDPA)

Mali. January About this Report and the World Database on Protected Areas (WDPA)

Cameroon. January About this Report and the World Database on Protected Areas (WDPA)

Congo. January About this Report and the World Database on Protected Areas (WDPA)

Equatorial Guinea. January About this Report and the World Database on Protected Areas (WDPA)

Protected Areas Information Management Systems and Challenges in Korea Hong, Suk-Hwan. Pusan National University

WELCOME & INTRODUCTION

ACRONYMS AREAS COUNTRIES MARINE TERMS

Indicator : Coverage of protected areas in relation to marine areas

World Database on Protected Areas User Manual 1.5

Biodiversity and Protected Areas Management Project

Subject: Request for tenders: GIS Specialist Consultant Pacific Islands Protected Area Portal (PIPAP)

1. The dataset Protected Areas was filtered, removing only sites with: a. Status = Adopted, Designated, Inscribed, and Not Reported.

Data Sources and Methods for the Protected Areas Indicators. July 2012

Calculating the Natura 2000 network area in Europe: The GIS approach

Monitoring of Tropical Deforestation and Land Cover Changes in Protected Areas: JRC Perspective

Welcome to side event. Internationally Designated Areas and their Synergies

Statutory framework of the world network of biosphere reserves UNESCO General Conference 1996

Documentation for the Natural Resource Protection and Child Health Indicators, 2017 Release

West-Estonian Archipelago Biosphere Reserve and Lima Action Plan

Protected Planet National Technical Series: Republic of Korea

HELSINKI COMMISSION Baltic Marine Environment Protection Commission

HELCOM-VASAB Maritime Spatial Planning Working Group Twelfth Meeting Gdansk, Poland, February 2016

EuroGEOSS Protected Areas Pilot

Ecologically or Biologically Significant Areas (EBSAs) in the Convention on Biological Diversity Arctic EBSA workshop as an example

THE SEVILLE STRATEGY ON BIOSPHERE RESERVES

Strategies for biodiversity conservation

Dr Ozlem Adiyaman Earth Sciences and Geo-hazards Risk Reduction Section Division of Ecological and Earth Sciences ( ) NATURAL SCIENCES

The Role of Wilderness in Climate Change Adaptation

Data Sources and Methods for the Protected Areas Indicators. August 2014

Statutory Framework of Biosphere Reserves. The Statutory Framework of the World Network of Biosphere Reserves

Coverage of protected areas

DELIVERING ECOSYSTEM- BASED MARINE SPATIAL PLANNING IN PRACTICE

Country Fiche Lithuania

Global Distribution of Coral Reefs

An Update on Land Use & Land Cover Mapping in Ireland

Natura 2000 and spatial planning. Executive summary

The Danish Maritime Spatial Data Infrastructure (MSDI) Geodata of the Sea

EABRN, 20 years of History and its Future (East Asia Biosphere Reserve Network)

GENERAL RECOMMENDATIONS. Session 7. Breakout discussion. discuss on regional and interregional. proposals 1. COLLABORATION BETWEEN PROGRAMMES

The HELCOM Baltic Sea Action Plan and Marine Spatial Planning

3.3 Threats to Biodiversity

Grant agreement number:

The European Union and its Overseas Entities

IN THE ZONE? Nature and culture in a Swedish Biosphere Reserve. Katarina Saltzman Department of Conservation University of Gothenburg

ARCH PROJET Activity 1 -Synthesis-

SWOS (The Satellite-based Wetland Observation Service) Satellite images for peatland monitoring and management Kathrin Weise, Jena-Optronik GmbH

Biosphere Reserves : Bureaucratic Label or Sustainable Landscape. KAERA COETZER, BFN Erasmus, ETF Witkowski

PAD-US (CBI Edition) Version 2: Standards and Procedures

cooperating sites as the three initial units of a new Southern Appalachian Biosphere Reserve, approved by UNESCO in 1988.

BalticBOOST Appendix 1, WP 3.3 Deliverable 1 Final report 14 February 2017

Vladimir Krever, Mikhail Stishov, Irina Onufrenya

Why do we need a global framework for MPAs in ABNJ? Kristina M. Gjerde IUCN High Seas Policy Advisor

Contents: LEVANTE DE ALMERÍA A INFORMATION SYSTEM OBJECTIVES AND ACTIONS GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM RESULTS

Additional information (material for interactions and analysis chapter) to document 3/1, the PLAN BOTHNIA MSP Assessment

THE SEVILLE STRATEGY FOR BIOSPHERE RESERVES

Ontario s Niagara Escarpment A UNESCO World Biosphere Reserve

United Nations. List of Protected Areas. ,,j.j ^WCPA. lucn. ^K^BV WORLD COMMISSION ^^ ^t^ H UNEP WCMC ON PROTECTED AREAS. The World Conservation Union

Natura 2000 in the marine environment: state of implementation and next steps

1. Project information Jardines de la Reina National Park: Technical support to strengthen management & World Heritage nomination preparation

Ocean planning as a tool for blue growth and smart specialization - Frederico Cardigos -

How important is to be a Biosphere Reserve of UNESCO? The case of Berlenga Islands (Peniche Portugal)

Cluster and S3:EU-USA COMPARISON OF DATABASE AND MAPPING TOOLS

European Commission STUDY ON INTERIM EVALUATION OF EUROPEAN MARINE OBSERVATION AND DATA NETWORK. Executive Summary

Maritime Spatial Planning in the Baltic Sea Region

Community based approaches to natural resource management governance and the role of government

SIF_7.1_v2. Indicator. Measurement. What should the measurement tell us?

United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization Executive Board

Management Planning & Implementation of Communication Measures for Terrestrial Natura 2000 Sites in the Maltese Islands Epsilon-Adi Consortium

Other effective area based conservation. The case of Colombia

Country Fiche Latvia Updated October 2016

The Digital Observatory for Protected Areas (DOPA) Explorer 1.0

The Establishment of a Database on Current Research in UNESCO Biosphere Reserves: Limitations and Opportunities

Resolution XIII.23. Wetlands in the Arctic and sub-arctic

THE NATURESERVE NETWORK

PROPOSED UNESCO FUNDY BIOSPHERE RESERVE

Carpathians Unite mechanism of consultation and cooperation for implementation of the Carpathian Convention

The mapping of habitats: an indispensable tool to the planning and management of protected areas in Catalonia

Private Protected Areas Towards a comprehensive map for South Africa Alta De Vos* & Graeme Cumming

Global Distribution of Northern Fur Seals (2013)

The Governance of Land Use

CAMP SLOVENIA. Mezek Slavko RRC Koper. Project coordinator November 2005

INDICATORS FOR INTEGRATED COASTAL ZONE MANAGEMENT (ICZM)

Maritime Spatial Planning: Transboundary Cooperation in the Celtic Seas Looking Ahead

PROMOTING NATURE CONSERVATION AND SUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT IN THE RURAL AREAS OF HONG KONG

Subregional Cooperation for Strengthening Marine Protected Areas in North-East Asia

U.S. Marine Protected Areas Boundaries: MPA Inventory

Group of Experts on Protected Areas and Ecological Networks 9th meeting 4-5 October 2018

Stevns Klint SITE INFORMATION. IUCN Conservation Outlook Assessment 2014 (archived) Finalised on 27 October 2014

Chapter 6. Fundamentals of GIS-Based Data Analysis for Decision Support. Table 6.1. Spatial Data Transformations by Geospatial Data Types

Biodiversity and Ecosystem services Thinking globally, acting locally

Geodiversity, Geoheritage & Geoconservation

Transcription:

WDPA Data Status Report About this Report and the World Database on Protected Areas (WDPA) Map showing protected areas in the WDPA Suriname January 2015 The WDPA is the most comprehensive global dataset on terrestrial and marine protected areas, incorporating the official UN List of Protected Areas. The WDPA dataset is not necessarily a complete representation of all the protected areas which have been designated in country. The quality of the WDPA depends on the accessibility of accurate, comprehensive, up-to-date protected areas information from data holders. This report describes the current status of data in the WDPA for all sites included in the January 2015 monthly release for Suriname. The WDPA is updated each month, and the information in this factsheet may have been superseded by a more recent update. This fact sheet has been produced with support from the 10th European Development Fund through the BIOPAMA (Biodiversity and Protected Areas Management) Programme. The contents of this publication are the sole responsibility of UNEP-WCMC and can in no way be taken to reflect the views of the European Union nor of the ACP Secretariat. The boundaries and names shown, and the designations used on this map do not imply official endorsement or acceptance by the United Nations. SUR Report prepared on 23/02/2015 Page 1 of 5

Protected areas data in the WDPA for Suriname There are 22 protected area records stored in the WDPA for Suriname, 20 are national-level protected areas with 2 designated under international and regional agreements or 95% of the data have boundaries in polygon format, with the remaining 5% depicted in point format (i.e. a single latitude and longitude point for the protected area). See Figure 1. Figure 1: Ratio of points to polygons 5% 95% Polygons Points Of the 22 protected areas, 10 (45%) include a marine component. These protected areas may be either partially or completely within the marine environment. Data for protected areas designated under international conventions and agreements There are 2 protected areas in the WDPA designated under international or regional conventions or agreements. 1 is a World Heritage Site (WHS); 1 is a Ramsar Wetlands of International Importance; See Figure 2. 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 Figure 2: Number of WHS, Ramsar and MAB sites WHS Ramsar MAB Data for national-level protected areas There are 20 national-level protected area records in the WDPA. IUCN Management Categories have been reported for 14 of these records. The remaining 6 are recorded as Not Reported. Figure 3: National-level protected areas by IUCN Management Category NR, 30% II, 10% Figure 3 shows the allocation of IUCN Management Categories across national-level protected area records in the WDPA (numbers of sites in each category are shown in Table 2 at the end of this report). VI, 10% IV, 50% SUR Report prepared on 23/02/2015 Page 2 of 5

Completeness of WDPA Data Attributes for Suriname The WDPA requires that a minimum set of information is provided with each protected area record. These data attributes are defined by the WDPA Data Standard. Table 1 shows the extent to which key attributes have been reported by data providers for all protected area records in the WDPA for Suriname. Table 1: Completeness of selected attributes Attribute Completeness IUCN Category 73% Status (designated or proposed) % Status Year 73% Governance Type 0% Management Authority 0% Link to Management Plan 0% The WDPA Data Standard can be accessed at http://www.unep-wcmc.org/resources-and-data. Data sources in the WDPA for Suriname Data in the WDPA have been obtained or validated from 3 sources for Suriname. Figure 4 shows the breakdown of when protected area records in the WDPA were last updated or validated. Figure 4: Percentage of records updated or validated by year 5% 5% 5% Data for protected areas designated under international agreements and conventions have been sourced from the relevant convention secretariat. This includes: UNESCO World Heritage Centre, Ramsar Convention Secretariat and UNESCO Man and The Biosphere Programme. Not reported 2004-2008 <1999 86% 2009-2011 1999-2003 2012-2014 Data for national-level protected areas in the WDPA have been sourced from national authorities wherever possible. Information may also be supplemented by data from other agencies or organisations working in each country. As part of the update process for national data, national authorities are given the opportunity to review, validate and, where necessary, edit all existing WDPA records for their country. All updates to the WDPA by national authorities take priority over other sources and are considered to be the authoritative version. There is one record in the WDPA with no reported source for Suriname. The three sources for national-level data in Suriname are: Conservation International, Washington, USA; Amazonia SURPA; Natuurbeschermingscommissie - Nature Protection Commission, c/o Nature Conservation Div. of the Forest Service, Suriname. SUR Report prepared on 23/02/2015 Page 3 of 5

Table 2: WDPA Data for Suriname (as of January 2015) Polygons Points Total Realm: terrestrial or marine Terrestrial 12 0 12 Marine (partially or completely) 9 1 10 Status: designated or proposed Designated 16 1 17 Proposed 5 0 5 Status not reported 0 0 0 International Protected Areas 2 0 2 UNESCO World Heritage Sites 1 0 1 Wetlands of International Importance (Ramsar sites) 1 0 1 UNESCO Man and Biosphere Reserves 0 0 0 Regional Protected Areas 0 0 0 Baltic Sea Protected Area (HELCOM) 0 0 0 Cartagena Special Protected Area 0 0 0 Marine Protected Area (CCAMLR) 0 0 0 Marine Protected Area (OSPAR) 0 0 0 Site of Community Importance (Habitats Directive) 0 0 0 Special Protection Area (Birds Directive) 0 0 0 Specially Protected Area of Marine Importance (Barcelona Conv.) 0 0 0 National Protected Areas: IUCN Management Category 19 1 20 Ia: Strict Nature Reserve 0 0 0 Ib: Wilderness Area 0 0 0 II: National Park 2 0 2 III: National Monument or Feature 0 0 0 IV: Habitat/species management area 9 1 10 V: Protected Area with sustainable use 0 0 0 VI: Protected Landscape/Seascape 2 0 2 Not Reported (NR) 6 0 6 Total number of records in the WDPA for Suriname 21 1 22 SUR Report prepared on 23/02/2015 Page 4 of 5

WDPA Quality Indicators for Suriname The percentage of records with boundaries in polygon format The WDPA stores all records with spatial (location) data. These data can be polygons which represent the boundaries of the protected area, or a single latitude/longitude point which shows the general location of the protected area. This indicator shows the percentage of records with boundaries - the preferred spatial data. 95 0 95 The percentage of data attributes which have been reported by the data provider Each record in the WDPA has 25 fields for which data attributes are requested. This indicator shows the weighted percentage of data fields which have been reported, based on the minimum, core and complete attributes. 86 63 88 99 The percentage of records updated or validated by the data provider in the last 5 years UNEP-WCMC sets a target to update each record in the WDPA at least every five years. This indicator shows the percentage of records updated in the last 5 years (since January 2010). 9 0 91 The percentage of records where the area of the polygon is within 5% of the area reported The area (km 2 ) reported for a protected area may sometimes differ from the calculated GIS area of the boundary polygon provided, possibly indicating a discrepancy within the information submitted. This indicator shows the percentage of records where the area of the polygon is within a threshold of 5% of the area reported. The threshold allows for differences due to projections and software used for calculating the GIS area. 33 0 67 0 The range of scores for individual countries in the WDPA Country score for Suriname in January 2015 (solid circle) and 2014 (dotted circle) Overall score for the WDPA SUR Report prepared on 23/02/2015 Page 5 of 5