F. Zimmermann and M.-P. Zorzano, CERN, Geneva, Switzerland

Similar documents
Note. Performance limitations of circular colliders: head-on collisions

INTRA-BEAM SCATTERING, IMPEDANCE, AND INSTABILITIES IN ULTIMATE STORAGE RINGS

LECTURE 18. Beam loss and beam emittance growth. Mechanisms for beam loss. Mechanisms for emittance growth and beam loss Beam lifetime:

Overview of LHC Accelerator

Low Emittance Machines

Accelerator Physics Final Exam pts.

Aperture Measurements and Implications

On behalf of: F. Antoniou, H. Bartosik, T. Bohl, Y. Papaphilippou (CERN), N. Milas, A. Streun (PSI/SLS), M. Pivi (SLAC), T.

On-axis injection into small dynamic aperture

CERN Accelerator School. Intermediate Accelerator Physics Course Chios, Greece, September Low Emittance Rings

The Relativistic Stern-Gerlach Interaction as a Tool for Attaining the Spin Separation

Low Emittance Machines

Electron Cloud Studies for KEKB and ATF KEK, May 17 May 30, 2003

Phase Space Study of the Synchrotron Oscillation and Radiation Damping of the Longitudinal and Transverse Oscillations

Compressor Lattice Design for SPL Beam

Longitudinal Top-up Injection for Small Aperture Storage Rings

Bernhard Holzer, CERN-LHC

Concept of Luminosity

Transverse dynamics Selected topics. Erik Adli, University of Oslo, August 2016, v2.21

TUNE SPREAD STUDIES AT INJECTION ENERGIES FOR THE CERN PROTON SYNCHROTRON BOOSTER

ELIC: A High Luminosity And Efficient Spin Manipulation Electron-Light Ion Collider Based At CEBAF

Operational Experience with HERA

Design Studies for the Proposed CESR Accelerator Test Facility

Advanced Storage Photon Ring Source Upgrade Project:

HE-LHC Optics Development

LHC Upgrade Plan and Ideas - scenarios & constraints from the machine side

Accelerator Physics Homework #3 P470 (Problems: 1-5)

D. Brandt, CERN. CAS Frascati 2008 Accelerators for Newcomers D. Brandt 1

PBL (Problem-Based Learning) scenario for Accelerator Physics Mats Lindroos and E. Métral (CERN, Switzerland) Lund University, Sweden, March 19-23,

Introduction to particle accelerators

Physics 610. Adv Particle Physics. April 7, 2014

Compressor Ring. Contents Where do we go? Beam physics limitations Possible Compressor ring choices Conclusions. Valeri Lebedev.

A Luminosity Leveling Method for LHC Luminosity Upgrade using an Early Separation Scheme

LHC Luminosity and Energy Upgrade

Engines of Discovery

EUROPEAN ORGANIZATION FOR NUCLEAR RESEARCH European Laboratory for Particle Physics. Absolute Luminosity from Machine Parameters

EUROPEAN ORGANIZATION FOR NUCLEAR RESEARCH CERN - SL DIVISION. Multi-TeV CLIC Photon Collider Option. H. Burkhardt

Lattice Design for the Taiwan Photon Source (TPS) at NSRRC

arxiv: v1 [physics.acc-ph] 21 Oct 2014

Accelerator. Physics of PEP-I1. Lecture #7. March 13,1998. Dr. John Seeman

Beam Scattering Effects - Simulation Tools Developed at The APS. A. Xiao and M. Borland Mini-workshop on Dynamic Aperture Issues of USR Nov.

Low energy electron storage ring with tunable compaction factor

Lattice Design and Performance for PEP-X Light Source

ILC Damping Ring Alternative Lattice Design (Modified FODO)

Beam Dynamics. D. Brandt, CERN. CAS Bruges June 2009 Beam Dynamics D. Brandt 1

Fundamental Concepts of Particle Accelerators V : Future of the High Energy Accelerators. Koji TAKATA KEK. Accelerator Course, Sokendai

CERN-ATS HiLumi LHC. FP7 High Luminosity Large Hadron Collider Design Study PUBLICATION

HL-LHC: parameter space, constraints & possible options

Theory English (Official)

Simulations of HL-LHC Crab Cavity Noise using HEADTAIL

SBF Accelerator Principles

Run2 Problem List (Bold-faced items are those the BP Department can work on) October 4, 2002

8 lectures on accelerator physics

Plans for CESR (or Life Without CLEO)

Beam Physics at SLAC. Yunhai Cai Beam Physics Department Head. July 8, 2008 SLAC Annual Program Review Page 1

Head-tail instability caused by electron cloud in positron storage rings

10 GeV Synchrotron Longitudinal Dynamics

Longitudinal Momentum Mining of Beam Particles in a Storage Ring

50 MeV 1.4 GeV 25GeV 450 GeV 8 TeV. Sources of emittance growth CAS 07 Liverpool. Sept D. Möhl, slide 1

Beam halo formation in high-intensity beams

Contents. LC : Linear Collider. µ-µ Collider. Laser-Plasma Wave Accelerator. Livingston Chart 6 References

The TESLA Dogbone Damping Ring

A SCALING LAW DERIVED FROM A BROADBAND IMPEDANCE APPLICATION TO SPEAR

Electron Cloud in Wigglers

Longitudinal Dynamics

UPGRADE ISSUES FOR THE CERN ACCELERATOR COMPLEX

Laser-Electron Storage Ring Zhirong Huang and Ronald D. Ruth Stanford Linear Accelerator Center, Stanford University, Stanford, CA (October 16,

A Proposal of Harmonictron

Low alpha mode for SPEAR3 and a potential THz beamline

CERN Accelerator School Budapest, Hungary 7 October Giulia Papotti (CERN, BE-OP-LHC) acknowledgements to: W. Herr, W. Kozanecki, J.

Muon Front-End without Cooling

Fundamental Concepts of Particle Accelerators V: Future of the High Energy Accelerators VI: References. Koji TAKATA KEK. Accelerator Course, Sokendai

SIMULATION STUDY FOR MEIC ELECTRON COOLING*

Linear Collider Collaboration Tech Notes

The Very Large Hadron Collider Beam Collimation System

Tools of Particle Physics I Accelerators

PBL SCENARIO ON ACCELERATORS: SUMMARY

Introduction to Longitudinal Beam Dynamics

Impedance & Instabilities

DEVELOPMENT AND BENCHMARKING OF CODES FOR SIMULATION OF BEAM-BEAM EFFECTS AT THE LHC

FURTHER UNDERSTANDING THE LCLS INJECTOR EMITTANCE*

The FAIR Accelerator Facility

Application of cooling methods at NICA project. G.Trubnikov JINR, Dubna

Introduction to Transverse Beam Dynamics

BEAM TESTS OF THE LHC TRANSVERSE FEEDBACK SYSTEM

Energy Calibration of the LHC Beams at 4 TeV

The Luminosity Upgrade at RHIC. G. Robert-Demolaize, Brookhaven National Laboratory

Exploration of a Tevatron-Sized Ultimate Light Source

ELECTRON DYNAMICS WITH SYNCHROTRON RADIATION

SLS at the Paul Scherrer Institute (PSI), Villigen, Switzerland

CSR Benchmark Test-Case Results

ACHIEVABLE SPACE-CHARGE TUNE SHIFT WITH LONG LIFETIME IN THE CERN PS & SPS

Ultra-Relativistic Heavy Ion Physics (FYSH551), May 31, 2013 Jan Rak and Thorsten Renk

6 Bunch Compressor and Transfer to Main Linac

The Electron-Ion Collider

!"#$%$!&'()$"('*+,-')'+-$#..+/+,0)&,$%.1&&/$ LONGITUDINAL BEAM DYNAMICS

Luminosity Goals, Critical Parameters

day1- determining particle properties Peter Wittich Cornell University

Proposal to convert TLS Booster for hadron accelerator

+.V) eo(o) -2 so - sx. hngc)90w3-- Beam-beam collisions and crossing angles in RHIC*

Transcription:

LHC Project Note 244 11.12.2000 Touschek Scattering in HERA and LHC F. Zimmermann and M.-P. Zorzano, CERN, Geneva, Switzerland Keywords: Touschek effect, beam loss, coasting beam Summary We estimate the rate at which coasting beam is generated via the Touschek effect by evaluating analytic expressions for flat and round beams. The Touschek scattering rate computed for HERA at 920 GeV is of the order of one percent over 8 hours. In the LHC at injection the coasting beam component is about 2 10 4 after one hour. At top energy the scattering rate is two times smaller, and, taking into account particle loss due to synchrotron radiation, it will give rise to a steady-state coasting beam component of about 10 5. 1 Introduction In HERA a significant portion of the proton beam is coasting, i.e., not trapped in the rf bucket, potentially impairing the HERA-B experiment [1]. We here explore whether the generation of the coasting beam component can be explained by the Touschek effect, and we estimate the corresponding coasting-beam component at the LHC. 2 Formulae The name Touschek effect [2] refers to a particle-particle collision within a bunch, by which so much energy is transferred from transverse into longitudinal phase space, that the scattered particles leave the stable rf bucket. Since it is caused by a particle-particle collision, the loss rate due to Touschek scattering is quadratic in the bunch population, namely dn b dt = αn 2 b. (1) The number of particles outside the rf bucket increases as N coast = αn 0t 1+αN 0 t N 0 (2) This is an internal CERN publication and does not necessarily reflect the views of the LHC project management. 1

where N 0 = N b (0) denotes the initial bunch population. The traditional expressions for the Touschek effect in an (electron) storage ring refer mainly to flat beams. For such a flat beam (with ɛ x /β x ɛ y /β y ), the Touschek coefficient, α = α fl,isgiven by [3, 4] α fl = 4πr2 pc J(η, δq) (3) γ 2 η 2 V where r p (=1.5 10 18 m) is the classical proton radius, V =8π 3/2 σ x σ y σ z the bunch volume, c the speed of light, γ the energy divided by the rest mass, η =( E/E) max the maximum relative energy deviation accepted by the rf system, δq = γσ x /β x,andjafunction of η and δq, which, for δq < 0.1 and η less than 10 3, can be approximated as [3] J(η, δq) ( ) 2 1 η 4 ln 2.077. (4) πδq δq For round beams, a Touschek lifetime formula was derived by Miyahara [5]. However, it appears that there is a factor of one half missing in his result [6]. The correced formula for a round beam is α rd = πr2 0 c ( ) β x β y δq γ 4 σ x σ y Vη D η (5) with D(ɛ) = e u ( u ɛ ɛ u 3/2 ɛ 1 1 2 ln u ) du ɛ (6) Piwinski has derived the Touschek lifetime for arbitrary aspect ratio [7, 8]. Ignoring the contribution from dispersion his expression reads α piw = r0c 2 8πγ 2 F(τm,B 1,B 2 ) σ z σ x σ y (7) where the brackets denote the average over the whole circumference, and ( ( ) π/2 F (τ m,b 1,B 2 )=2 π(b1 2 B2) 2 (2τ +1) 2 τ/τm κ m 1+τ 1 /τ + τ ( 2+ 1 ) ln τ/τ ) m 2τ 1+τ ττ m (1 + τ) e B 1τ I 0 (B 2 τ) 1+τdκ (8) with I 0 the modified Bessel function, τ = tan 2 κ, κ m = arctan τ m, τ m = β 2 η 2 (β is the relativistic factor), B 1 = 1 ( ) β 2 x + β2 y 2β 2 γ 4 σx 2 σy 2 (9) and [ ] 1/2 B 2 = B1 2 β2 x β2 y. β 4 γ 4 σx 2σ2 y (10) 2

variable symbol value rms horizontal beam size σ x 450 µm rms vertical beam size σ y 450 µm rms bunch length σ z 60 mm average beta function β x,y 50 m momentum compaction factor α c 0.00127 beam energy E 920 GeV number of proton bunches n b 174 number of protons per bunch N b 4 10 10 revolution time T 0 21 µs transverse emittance (1σ) ɛ x,y 4.1 nm relativistic factor γ 981 bunch volume V 541 mm 3 rms uncorrel. trans. momentum in units of m 0 c δq 0.00883 1st rf voltage ˆVrf,1 100 kv 2nd rf voltage ˆVrf,2 540 kv 1st harmonic number h 1 1100 2nd harmonic number h 2 4400 energy acceptance η 3.4 10 4 3 Estimates 3.1 HERA Table 1: HERA proton-beam parameters Table 1 compiles relevant HERA parameters. HERA has two rf systems operating at the harmonic numbers h 1 (=1100) and h 2 (=4400) with voltages ˆV 1 and ˆV 2. The rf energy acceptance η provided by this double rf system is computed as η ( ) ( E 2e = E max πα c E 0 [ ˆVrf,1 h 1 + ˆV ]) 1/2 rf,2, (11) h 2 where α c denotes the momentum compaction factor. We remark that, roughly, η V rf and σ z 1/ V rf so that α fl 1/ V rf, ignoring the weak dependence of J on the rf voltage. Using the numbers of Table 1, we find J 71 from Eq. (4), and the flat-beam Touschek coefficient, Eq. (3), evaluates to α fl 10 17 s 1. For a two times higher rf voltage, we find J 60 and α 6 10 18 s 1. Evaluating the more adequate round-beam expression, Eq. (5), for the HERA parameters of Table 1, we obtain α rd 6.3 10 18 s, and with a two times higher rf voltage α rd 3.0 10 18 s. Thus, for HERA the round-beam formula predicts a factor 2 longer Touschek lifetime than the flat-beam formula. Note that the ratio of the flat and round Touschek rates, ( ln ( ) ) η 2 δq 2.077 α fl α rd γσ y πηβy 3 D(η 2 /δq 2 ), (12)

0.0075 0.007 rf voltages 100 kv and 540 kv rf voltages 200 kv and 1080 kv 0.0065 0.006 0.0055 0.005 0.0045 0.004 0.0035 0.003 0.0025 0.002 0.0015 0.001 0.0005 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Figure 1: Coasting-beam component in HERA, N coast /N 0 due to Touschek scattering as a function of time in hours, calculated from Eqs. (2) and (7). The two curves refer to two different settings of the rf voltages. could in principle assume any value. Evaluating Piwinski s formula, Eq. (7), we find for the nominal rf voltage α piw 6.24 10 18 s, and with the two times higher rf voltage α piw 2.97 10 18 s, in excellent agreement with the round-beam estimate of Eq. (5). Figure 1 shows the increase of the coasting-beam component in HERA over an 8 hour period for two different rf voltages, calculated using Eq. (2) and the Piwinski formula, Eq. (7). After an 8-hour store the expected fraction of particles outside the rf bucket, due to Touschek scattering, is of the order of 1%. 3.2 LHC We can also estimate the Touschek effect for the LHC. The corresponding parameters at injection and at top energy are listed in Table 2. As in HERA, two rf systems are employed. The rf parameters are taken from Ref. [9]. In case of the LHC, the round beam estimate, Eq. (5), evaluates to α rd 5.0 10 19 s 1 at injection, and α rd 2.0 10 19 s 1 at 7 TeV. From Piwinski s formula, Eq. (7), we obtain similar numbers: α piw 5.3 10 19 s 1 and α piw 2.1 10 19 s 1, respectively. Thus, using N 0 =1.05 10 11 and Eq. (2), coasting beam is produced at a rate per proton of 1.8 10 4 hr 1 during injection and 8 10 5 hr 1 at top energy. Once the protons are outside of the bucket, they lose energy due to synchrotron radiation [10]. This energy loss amounts to dδ/dt 2.8 10 9 s 1 at 450 GeV and dδ/dt 1.0 10 5 s 1 4

at 7 TeV [11]. If the collimators provide an energy aperture of 3.9 10 3 [12], a scattered proton is lost after about τ loss 390 hours at injection or after τ loss 6.5 minutes at top energy, respectively. While the energy drift due to synchrotron radiation is unimportant at injection, in collision it gives rise to a steady-state coasting beam fraction of α piw N 0 τ loss 10 5. variable symbol value (inj.) value (top) rms horizontal beam size σ x 883 µm 220 µm rms vertical beam size σ y 883 µm 220 µm rms bunch length σ z 130 mm 77 mm average beta function β x,y 100 m 100 m momentum compaction factor α c 0.000347 0.000347 beam energy E 450 GeV 7000 GeV number of proton bunches n b 2800 2800 number of protons per bunch N b 1.05 10 11 1.05 10 11 revolution time T 0 800 µs 800 µs transverse emittance (1σ) ɛ x,y 7.8 nm 7.8 nm relativistic factor γ 480 480 bunch volume V 4515 mm 3 166 mm 3 rms uncorrel. trans. momentum in units of m 0 c δq 0.00424 0.0171 1st rf voltage ˆVrf,1 750 kv 16000 kv 2nd rf voltage ˆVrf,2 3000 kv 0kV 1st harmonic number h 35640 35640 2nd harmonic number h 17820 17820 energy acceptance η 0.88 10 3 0.34 10 3 Table 2: LHC parameters at injection and top energy. 4 Conclusion In HERA, the coasting beam component generated by Touschek scattering is estimated to be about 1% over 8 hours. This may be compatible with observations, but it is probably not the dominant effect, since recent studies [13] suggest that about 4% coasting beam is generated in 3 hours and that the dominant process exhibits diffusion characteristics. In the LHC, after 1 hour at injection energy a coasting beam fraction of 2 10 4 has been created by the Touschek effect. At top energy, protons are scattered outside of the rf bucket at a rate of 10 4 per proton and hour, i.e., two times smaller than at injection. Taking into account the loss of these protons within 6 7 minutes due to synchrotron radiation and energy collimation, the steady-state coasting-beam component at top energy is about 10 5. A more refined calculation of the Touschek scattering would take into account the contribution from dispersion and the variation of lattice parameters around the ring. 5

Acknowledgements We thank D. Kaltchev, A. Piwinski, F. Ruggiero, A. Verdier, and R. Wanzenberg for useful comments and inspiring discussions. References [1] K. Ehret et al., Observation of coasting beam at the HERA Proton Ring, DESY 00-018 (2000). [2] C. Bernadini et al., Phys. Rev. Letters, vol. 10, p. 407 (1963). [3] R.P. Walker, Calculation of the Touschek Lifetime in Electron Storage Rings, PAC 1987. [4] U. Voelkel, DESY 67/5, 1967. [5] Y. Miyahara, Jap. J. Appl. Phys., vol. 24, p. L742 (1985). [6] A. Piwinski, private communication (2000). [7] A. Piwinski, The Touschek Effect in Strong Focusing Storage Rings, DESY 98-179 (1998). [8] A. Piwinski, Touschek Effect and Intrabeam Scattering, in A. Chao and M. Tigner (eds.), Handbook of Accelerator Physics and Engineering, World Scientific (1999). [9] E. Shaposhnikova, Longitudinal Beam Parameters during Acceleration in the LHC, SL Note in preparation (2000). [10] A. Verdier reminded us of this effect. [11] The LHC Study Group, The Large Hadron Collider - Conceptual Design, CERN/AC/95-05 (1995). [12] D. Kaltchev, private communication (2000). [13] M.-P. Zorzano and R. Wanzenberg, Intrabeam Scattering and the Coasting Beam in the HERA Proton Ring, CERN-SL-2000-072-AP, DESY-HERA-00-06 (2000). 6