Bimodal regime in young massive clusters leading to formation of subsequent stellar generations

Similar documents
2D hydrodynamic simulations of super star cluster winds in a bimodal regime

ON THE ONSET OF SECONDARY STELLAR GENERATIONS IN GIANT STAR-FORMING REGIONS AND MASSIVE STAR CLUSTERS

Superbubble Feedback in Galaxy Formation

arxiv:astro-ph/ v1 26 Oct 2004

Supersonic Line Broadening within Young and Massive Super Star Clusters

The Importance of Winds and Radiative Feedback in Massive Star Formation

while the Planck mean opacity is defined by

The Superbubble Power Problem: Overview and Recent Developments. S. Oey

Galaxy Simulators Star Formation for Dummies ^

Some HI is in reasonably well defined clouds. Motions inside the cloud, and motion of the cloud will broaden and shift the observed lines!

SAM GEEN (ITA, HEIDELBERG)

Supernovae. Supernova basics Supernova types Light Curves SN Spectra after explosion Supernova Remnants (SNRs) Collisional Ionization

Theoretical ideas About Galaxy Wide Star Formation! Star Formation Efficiency!

Progenitor signatures in Supernova Remnant Morphology. Jacco Vink Utrecht University

Chapter 11 The Formation and Structure of Stars

Supernovae. Supernova basics Supernova types Light Curves SN Spectra after explosion Supernova Remnants (SNRs) Collisional Ionization

THE ROLE OF RADIATION PRESSURE IN HIGH-Z DWARF GALAXIES

Two Phase Formation of Massive Galaxies

Chapter 17: Stellar Evolution

Spiral Density waves initiate star formation

6 th lecture of Compact Object and Accretion, Master Programme at Leiden Observatory

The Impact of the Galactic Center Arches Cluster: Radio & X-ray Observations

Advanced Cosmological Simulations

Motivation Q: WHY IS STAR FORMATION SO INEFFICIENT? Ṁ M gas / dyn. Log SFR. Kennicutt Log. gas / dyn

The improvement of START

Enrique Vázquez-Semadeni. Centro de Radioastronomía y Astrofísica, UNAM, México

Survey of Astrophysics A110

7. The Evolution of Stars a schematic picture (Heavily inspired on Chapter 7 of Prialnik)

Starburst Dwarf Galaxies

the self-regulated agn feedback loop: chaotic cold accretion

Samuel Boissier, Laboratoire d'astrophysique de Marseille

Theoretical Modeling of Early Bolometric Light Curves of Type IIn Supernovae

Guiding Questions. The Birth of Stars

Lecture 21 Formation of Stars November 15, 2017

Stellar Populations: Resolved vs. unresolved

Gaia Revue des Exigences préliminaires 1

Lecture 23 Internal Structure of Molecular Clouds

Orianne ROOS CEA-Saclay Collaborators : F. Bournaud, J. Gabor, S. Juneau

HR Diagram, Star Clusters, and Stellar Evolution

Lecture 8: Stellar evolution II: Massive stars

Nuclear Star Formation, The Torus, & Gas Inflow in Seyfert Galaxies

Molecular gas & AGN feedback in brightest cluster galaxies

A Review of the Theory of Galactic Winds Driven by Stellar Feedback

Dr G. I. Ogilvie Lent Term 2005 INTRODUCTION

Chapter 11 The Formation of Stars

AGN winds and outflows

High-Energy Astrophysics Lecture 6: Black holes in galaxies and the fundamentals of accretion. Overview

Astr 2310 Thurs. March 23, 2017 Today s Topics

Chapter 19: The Evolution of Stars

Ionization Feedback in Massive Star Formation

AGN Feedback. Andrew King. Dept of Physics & Astronomy, University of Leicester Astronomical Institute, University of Amsterdam. Heidelberg, July 2014

Magnetic fields in the early phase of massive star formation

6. Interstellar Medium. Emission nebulae are diffuse patches of emission surrounding hot O and

Interstellar Medium and Star Birth

Overview spherical accretion

Photoionized winds of cool stars

Cold Clouds in Cool Cores

1.1 Introduction. 1.2 Evolution of massive stars

Gas 1: Molecular clouds

Star Cluster Formation

Cooling, dynamics and fragmentation of massive gas clouds: clues to the masses and radii of galaxies and clusters

arxiv:astro-ph/ v1 8 Mar 2006

Topics for Today s Class

Where do Stars Form?

Lec 3. Radiative Processes and HII Regions

Modelling star formation in galaxy formation simulations

Feedback, AGN and galaxy formation. Debora Sijacki

Massive Star Formation in the LMC Resolved at Clump Scales

The Birth Of Stars. How do stars form from the interstellar medium Where does star formation take place How do we induce star formation

HII regions. Massive (hot) stars produce large numbers of ionizing photons (energy above 13.6 ev) which ionize hydrogen in the vicinity.

THIRD-YEAR ASTROPHYSICS

Violent Disk Instability at z=1-4 Outflows; Clump Evolution; Compact Spheroids

The Ṁass- loss of Red Supergiants

Chapter 9. The Formation and Structure of Stars

Modelling RSG winds with PION

Dust in dwarf galaxies: The case of NGC 4214

Stellar Evolution: Outline

Implementing sub-grid treatments of galactic outflows into cosmological simulations. Hugo Martel Université Laval

SFEs in clusters. Final value of the SFE. For an isolated clump SFE exp. (t exp. = SFE(t exp. M ( cluster. t ) exp M clump. (t) M gas,i.

Stellar structure and evolution. Pierre Hily-Blant April 25, IPAG

Brown Dwarf Formation from Disk Fragmentation and Ejection

Enrique Vázquez-Semadeni. Instituto de Radioastronomía y Astrofísica, UNAM, México

The Fragmentation of expanding shells. Kazunari Iwasaki (Nagoya Univ.) Collaborate with S. Inutsuka (Nagoya Univ.) T. Tsuribe (Osaka Univ.

A World of Dust. Bare-Eye Nebula: Orion. Interstellar Medium

10/17/2012. Stellar Evolution. Lecture 14. NGC 7635: The Bubble Nebula (APOD) Prelim Results. Mean = 75.7 Stdev = 14.7

Chapter 15 The Milky Way Galaxy. The Milky Way

Detailed Study of a Turbulent multiphase multicomponent ISM

Einführung in die Astronomie II

Killing Dwarfs with Hot Pancakes. Frank C. van den Bosch (MPIA) with Houjun Mo, Xiaohu Yang & Neal Katz

Origin of Bi-modality

Galactic Supershells and GSH Vanessa A. Moss Parkes 50th Symposium 3rd November

Shock Waves: II. HII Regions + Planetary Nebulae

Supernova events and neutron stars

Analyzing X-Ray Pulses from Stellar Cores Pencil & Paper Version

Hierarchical merged Star clusters surviving infant mortality

Philamentary Structure and Velocity Gradients in the Orion A Cloud

Introductory Astrophysics A113. Death of Stars. Relation between the mass of a star and its death White dwarfs and supernovae Enrichment of the ISM

VII. Hydrodynamic theory of stellar winds

Enrique Vázquez-Semadeni. Centro de Radioastronomía y Astrofísica, UNAM, México

Evolution from the Main-Sequence

Transcription:

Bimodal regime in young massive clusters leading to formation of subsequent stellar generations Richard Wünsch J. Palouš, G. Tenorio-Tagle, C. Muñoz-Tuñón, S. Ehlerová Astronomical institute, Czech Academy of Sciences 14th August 2015 Wünsch (AsU CAS) 2G with bimodal regime 14.8.2015 1 / 1

Introduction Motivation: Cooling winds multiple populations young massive clusters have winds stellar winds, SNe collisions hot shocked wind outflow the wind may become thermally unstable inside the cluster if the cluster is massive and compact enough dense warm/cold clumps are formed depends whether they can self-shield against ionising stellar radiation new stars form either in-situ or after clumps sink into the centre 2nd generation (2G) stars enriched by products of massive stars chemical evolution similarities with FRMS scenario (desressin+07) - even fast winds can be captured predicts formation of 2G stars in the centre (may help with mass budget problem) Wünsch (AsU CAS) 2G with bimodal regime 14.8.2015 2 / 1

Introduction Motivation: Cooling winds multiple populations young massive clusters have winds stellar winds, SNe collisions hot shocked wind outflow the wind may become thermally unstable inside the cluster if the cluster is massive and compact enough dense warm/cold clumps are formed depends whether they can self-shield against ionising stellar radiation new stars form either in-situ or after clumps sink into the centre 2nd generation (2G) stars enriched by products of massive stars chemical evolution similarities with FRMS scenario (desressin+07) - even fast winds can be captured predicts formation of 2G stars in the centre (may help with mass budget problem) Wünsch (AsU CAS) 2G with bimodal regime 14.8.2015 2 / 1

Introduction Motivation: Cooling winds multiple populations young massive clusters have winds stellar winds, SNe collisions hot shocked wind outflow the wind may become thermally unstable inside the cluster if the cluster is massive and compact enough dense warm/cold clumps are formed depends whether they can self-shield against ionising stellar radiation new stars form either in-situ or after clumps sink into the centre 2nd generation (2G) stars enriched by products of massive stars chemical evolution similarities with FRMS scenario (desressin+07) - even fast winds can be captured predicts formation of 2G stars in the centre (may help with mass budget problem) Wünsch (AsU CAS) 2G with bimodal regime 14.8.2015 2 / 1

Introduction Motivation: Cooling winds multiple populations young massive clusters have winds stellar winds, SNe collisions hot shocked wind outflow the wind may become thermally unstable inside the cluster if the cluster is massive and compact enough dense warm/cold clumps are formed depends whether they can self-shield against ionising stellar radiation new stars form either in-situ or after clumps sink into the centre 2nd generation (2G) stars enriched by products of massive stars chemical evolution similarities with FRMS scenario (desressin+07) - even fast winds can be captured predicts formation of 2G stars in the centre (may help with mass budget problem) Wünsch (AsU CAS) 2G with bimodal regime 14.8.2015 2 / 1

The cluster wind Star cluster wind: semi-analytical model by Chevalier & Clegg (1985, Nat., 317, 44) E kin of stellar winds and SN ejecta thermalized, hot gas fills the cluster sources (stars) distributed according to top-hat profile solution of 1D spherically sym. HD equations, cooling neglected sonic point at the cluster border tested by Cantó+00, Raga+01 and others for stellar winds interaction of the wind with the parental cloud not covered here (harper-clark&murray09, krause+12,14, rogers&pittard13, rosen+14, herrera+,... ) Wünsch (AsU CAS) 2G with bimodal regime 14.8.2015 3 / 1

The cluster wind Star cluster wind: semi-analytical model by Chevalier & Clegg (1985, Nat., 317, 44) E kin of stellar winds and SN ejecta thermalized, hot gas fills the cluster sources (stars) distributed according to top-hat profile solution of 1D spherically sym. HD equations, cooling neglected sonic point at the cluster border tested by Cantó+00, Raga+01 and others for stellar winds interaction of the wind with the parental cloud not covered here (harper-clark&murray09, krause+12,14, rogers&pittard13, rosen+14, herrera+,... ) Wünsch (AsU CAS) 2G with bimodal regime 14.8.2015 3 / 1

The cluster wind Star cluster wind: semi-analytical model by Chevalier & Clegg (1985, Nat., 317, 44) E kin of stellar winds and SN ejecta thermalized, hot gas fills the cluster sources (stars) distributed according to top-hat profile solution of 1D spherically sym. HD equations, cooling neglected sonic point at the cluster border tested by Cantó+00, Raga+01 and others for stellar winds interaction of the wind with the parental cloud not covered here (harper-clark&murray09, krause+12,14, rogers&pittard13, rosen+14, herrera+,... ) Wünsch (AsU CAS) 2G with bimodal regime 14.8.2015 3 / 1

The cluster wind Star cluster wind: semi-analytical model by Chevalier & Clegg (1985, Nat., 317, 44) E kin of stellar winds and SN ejecta thermalized, hot gas fills the cluster sources (stars) distributed according to top-hat profile solution of 1D spherically sym. HD equations, cooling neglected sonic point at the cluster border tested by Cantó+00, Raga+01 and others for stellar winds interaction of the wind with the parental cloud not covered here (harper-clark&murray09, krause+12,14, rogers&pittard13, rosen+14, herrera+,... ) Wünsch (AsU CAS) 2G with bimodal regime 14.8.2015 3 / 1

The cluster wind Catastrophic cooling of the wind for massive clusters, cooling has to be taken into account radiative solution by silich+03 T drops at a certain radius predicts different observed X-ray flux (silich+04) - good agreement with observed X-ray fluxes (NGC4303 nuclear SSC; jiménez-bailón+03) above certain mass limit, no stationary wind solution exists catastrophic cooling (silich+03): } energy deposition M SC cooling ρ 2 wind MSC 2 inevitable tenorio-tagle+05 suggests extreme positive feedback (high SFE) Wünsch (AsU CAS) 2G with bimodal regime 14.8.2015 4 / 1

The cluster wind Catastrophic cooling of the wind for massive clusters, cooling has to be taken into account radiative solution by silich+03 T drops at a certain radius predicts different observed X-ray flux (silich+04) - good agreement with observed X-ray fluxes (NGC4303 nuclear SSC; jiménez-bailón+03) above certain mass limit, no stationary wind solution exists catastrophic cooling (silich+03): } energy deposition M SC cooling ρ 2 wind MSC 2 inevitable tenorio-tagle+05 suggests extreme positive feedback (high SFE) Wünsch (AsU CAS) 2G with bimodal regime 14.8.2015 4 / 1

Three wind regimes Bimodal regime quasi-adiabatic regime identical with CC85, cooling has no effect mechanical luminosity (cluster mass) substantially below L crit 3 parameters: L SC, M SC }{{} given by M SC, R SC L SC log T 8 7 temperature velocity va, = 2ηLSC MSC L crit 6 5 density 4 Quasi adiabatic 3 2 1 v < cs sound speed R SC 0 SW SN thermalization R SC v > cs r Wünsch (AsU CAS) 2G with bimodal regime 14.8.2015 5 / 1

Three wind regimes Bimodal regime radiative regime mechanical luminosity (cluster mass) slightly below L crit wind cools down at certain distance out of the cluster 3 parameters: L SC, M SC }{{} given by M SC, R SC L SC log T 8 7 temperature velocity L crit Radiative 6 5 4 3 density 2 1 R SC 0 R SC r Wünsch (AsU CAS) 2G with bimodal regime 14.8.2015 5 / 1

Three wind regimes Bimodal regime bimodal regime (tenorio-tagle+07; wünsch+08), cluster split by R st outer: wind, stationary solution exists inner: thermal instabilities, mass accumulation - secondary SF 3 parameters: L SC, M SC }{{} given by M SC, R SC L SC Bimodal log T 8 7 stagnation radius velocity L crit 6 5 density 4 3 2 temperature 1 R SC 0 R st R SC r Wünsch (AsU CAS) 2G with bimodal regime 14.8.2015 5 / 1

Bimodal regime Heating efficiency and mass loading hot gas inside cluster seems to be colder than energy / mass deposited by stars two new parameters: η ML : mass loading - additional (pristine) gas added to the hot phase η HE : heating efficiency - some thermal energy is lost from the hot phase (on the top of standard cooling) mass loading - evidence for mixing with pristine gas 1 : 1 (e.g. prantzos+07) Wünsch (AsU CAS) 2G with bimodal regime 14.8.2015 6 / 1

Bimodal regime Heating efficiency and mass loading hot gas inside cluster seems to be colder than energy / mass deposited by stars two new parameters: η ML : mass loading - additional (pristine) gas added to the hot phase η HE : heating efficiency - some thermal energy is lost from the hot phase (on the top of standard cooling) mass loading - evidence for mixing with pristine gas 1 : 1 (e.g. prantzos+07) Wünsch (AsU CAS) 2G with bimodal regime 14.8.2015 6 / 1

Bimodal regime Heating efficiency and mass loading hot gas inside cluster seems to be colder than energy / mass deposited by stars two new parameters: η ML : mass loading - additional (pristine) gas added to the hot phase η HE : heating efficiency - some thermal energy is lost from the hot phase (on the top of standard cooling) mass loading - evidence for mixing with pristine gas 1 : 1 (e.g. prantzos+07) obs. evidence for low heating efficiency missing energy from X-ray luminosities (rosen+14) recombination line profiles of SSCs in Antennae have moderately supersonic widths (gilbert&graham07) Wünsch (AsU CAS) 2G with bimodal regime 14.8.2015 6 / 1

Heating efficiency 2 Bimodal regime HII region coinciding with SSCs in M82 are very compact (silich+09) evidence for high heating efficiency in M82 defined globally: η HE = 30 100 %, strickland&heckman09) Wünsch (AsU CAS) 2G with bimodal regime 14.8.2015 7 / 1

Heating efficiency 2 Bimodal regime HII region coinciding with SSCs in M82 are very compact (silich+09) evidence for high heating efficiency in M82 defined globally: η HE = 30 100 %, strickland&heckman09) Wünsch (AsU CAS) 2G with bimodal regime 14.8.2015 7 / 1

Bimodal regime Evolution of Massive Compact Clusters (wünsch+11) evolution of the critical luminosity (L crit ) for 10 7 M cluster with R SC = 3 pc Starburst99 with Geneva evolutionary tracks (HighMass winds) 44 L crit : η he =1, η ml =0 log L SC, L crit [erg s -1 ] 42 40 38 L SC L crit : η he =0.05, η ml =1 36 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 t [Myr] Wünsch (AsU CAS) 2G with bimodal regime 14.8.2015 8 / 1

Bimodal regime Influence of ionising radiation Analytical estimate (palouš+14) dense warm gas sinks into centre: stream + central clump self-shielding mass of the central clump m self = ṄUV,SC µmh α kt ion P hot can streams of falling mass cool before they fall into centre? ( ) 3 t SS = 1 4 πq2 UV R5 SC R 2 st (1 + η ml ) 1Ṁ 1 SC µm Hα 2 kt P hot. central clump P = P ionised hot hot stream SF * * * * Wünsch (AsU CAS) 2G with bimodal regime 14.8.2015 9 / 1

Bimodal regime Influence of ionising radiation Analytical estimate (palouš+14) dense warm gas sinks into centre: stream + central clump self-shielding mass of the central clump m self = ṄUV,SC µmh α kt ion P hot can streams of falling mass cool before they fall into centre? ( ) 3 t SS = 1 4 πq2 UV R5 SC R 2 st (1 + η ml ) 1Ṁ 1 SC µm Hα 2 kt P hot. central clump P = P ionised hot hot stream SF * * * * Wünsch (AsU CAS) 2G with bimodal regime 14.8.2015 9 / 1

Bimodal regime Influence of ionising radiation Analytical estimate (palouš+14) dense warm gas sinks into centre: stream + central clump self-shielding mass of the central clump m self = ṄUV,SC µmh α kt ion P hot can streams of falling mass cool before they fall into centre? ( ) 3 t SS = 1 4 πq2 UV R5 SC R 2 st (1 + η ml ) 1Ṁ 1 SC µm Hα 2 kt P hot. central clump P = P ionised hot hot stream SF * * * * HealPix ray/cone tree node HealPix ray/cone RHD simulations: radiation treated by TreeRay: tree + reverse ray-tracing; wünsch+(in prep.) target cell Wünsch (AsU CAS) 2G with bimodal regime 14.8.2015 9 / 1

RHD simulation Bimodal regime Simulations AMR code Flash 128 3 grid M&E src: Schuster distribution optically thin cooling: raymond+76 fixed stellar gravity self-gravity: tree code (wünsch+15) heating by ionising radiation: TreeRay Wünsch (AsU CAS) 2G with bimodal regime 14.8.2015 10 / 1

Bimodal regime Simulations Evolution of accumulated mass 6 M sc = 10 7 M Sun, β = 1.5, R h = 2.38 pc, η HE = 0.05, η ML = 1.0 6 5.5 5 5.5 5 log mass [M Sun ] 4.5 4 3.5 3 total mass inserted 3 sinks+gas 2.5 sinks 2.5 gas windcal 2 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 2 time [Myr] first supernova 4.5 4 3.5 Wünsch (AsU CAS) 2G with bimodal regime 14.8.2015 11 / 1

Bimodal regime Simulations Evolution of accumulated mass log mass [M Sun ] 6 5.5 5 4.5 4 M sc = 10 7 M Sun, β = 1.5, R h = 2.38 pc, η HE = 0.05, η ML = 1.0 Mass budget at 3.5 Myr: 1G stellar mass: 10 7 M inserted by winds: 4 10 5 M mass loaded: 4 10 5 M 2G stellar mass: 7 10 5 M 3.5 very compact, in the centre should stay in the cluster during 1G tidal removal (khalaj&baumgardt15) 3 total mass inserted sinks+gas 3 2.5 sinks gas 2.5 2 windcal 2 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 remains in dense phase: 14000 M rapidly removed by SNe time [Myr] first supernova 6 5.5 5 4.5 4 3.5 Wünsch (AsU CAS) 2G with bimodal regime 14.8.2015 11 / 1

Bimodal regime Parameter space study Simulations 5 6.5 η ml 4 3 2 1 bimodal but no self-shielding compact 2G extended 2G 6 5.5 5 4.5 log accumulated mass [M Sun ] 0 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 η he not bimodal 4 Wünsch (AsU CAS) 2G with bimodal regime 14.8.2015 12 / 1

Summary & conclusions Summary wind cooling leading to bimodal regime is inevitable for high and compact enough cluster dense gas formed by thermal instability stays in the cluster and self-shields against ionising radiation secondary SF heating efficiency compact/extended 2G low heating efficiency SF in the central clump: 2G concentrated in the cluster centre; high heating efficiency SF in streams: 2G dispersed throughout the cluster much more difficult to capture SN ejecta; rapidly remove remaining accumulated gas Wünsch (AsU CAS) 2G with bimodal regime 14.8.2015 13 / 1

Summary & conclusions Summary wind cooling leading to bimodal regime is inevitable for high and compact enough cluster dense gas formed by thermal instability stays in the cluster and self-shields against ionising radiation secondary SF heating efficiency compact/extended 2G low heating efficiency SF in the central clump: 2G concentrated in the cluster centre; high heating efficiency SF in streams: 2G dispersed throughout the cluster much more difficult to capture SN ejecta; rapidly remove remaining accumulated gas Wünsch (AsU CAS) 2G with bimodal regime 14.8.2015 13 / 1

Summary & conclusions Summary wind cooling leading to bimodal regime is inevitable for high and compact enough cluster dense gas formed by thermal instability stays in the cluster and self-shields against ionising radiation secondary SF heating efficiency compact/extended 2G low heating efficiency SF in the central clump: 2G concentrated in the cluster centre; high heating efficiency SF in streams: 2G dispersed throughout the cluster much more difficult to capture SN ejecta; rapidly remove remaining accumulated gas Wünsch (AsU CAS) 2G with bimodal regime 14.8.2015 13 / 1

Summary & conclusions Summary wind cooling leading to bimodal regime is inevitable for high and compact enough cluster dense gas formed by thermal instability stays in the cluster and self-shields against ionising radiation secondary SF heating efficiency compact/extended 2G low heating efficiency SF in the central clump: 2G concentrated in the cluster centre; high heating efficiency SF in streams: 2G dispersed throughout the cluster much more difficult to capture SN ejecta; rapidly remove remaining accumulated gas Wünsch (AsU CAS) 2G with bimodal regime 14.8.2015 13 / 1

Summary & conclusions Thank you! Wünsch (AsU CAS) 2G with bimodal regime 14.8.2015 14 / 1