Neutrino Fluxes from a Conventional Neutrino Beam using CERN SPL

Similar documents
MARS Code Status. N. V. Mokhov and O. E. Krivosheev. Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory P.O. Box 500, Batavia, Illinois 60510, USA.

Muon Front-End without Cooling

Horn R&D. S. Gilardoni. Speaker A. Fabich CERN AB

Neutrino beamline prospects, concepts Milorad Popovic

Radiation Shielding of Extraction Absorbers for a Fermilab Photoinjector

New Hadroproduction results from the HARP/PS214 experiment at CERN PS

The High-Power-Target System of a Muon Collider or Neutrino Factory

The CNGS neutrino beam

Constraining the T2K Neutrino Flux Prediction with 2009 NA61/SHINE Replica-Target Data arxiv: v1 [physics.ins-det] 1 Apr 2018

MDI and detector modeling

Recent Results from Alysia Marino, University of Colorado at Boulder Neutrino Flux Workshop, University of Pittsburgh, Dec 6 8,2012

Anti-fiducial Muons in MINOS. Matthew Strait. University of Minnesota for the MINOS collaboration

Elementary Particle Physics Glossary. Course organiser: Dr Marcella Bona February 9, 2016

Particle production vs. energy: how do simulation results match experimental measurements?

LBNF Neutrino Beam. James Strait Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory P.O. Box 500, Batavia, IL , USA. on behalf of the LBNF/DUNE Team

SHiP: a new facility with a dedicated detector for neutrino physics

Some thoughts on neutrino beams for. neutrino cross-section measurements. A. Bueno, S. Navas, A. Rubbia. (ETH Zürich)

Results From The HARP Experiment

The ERC ENUBET project high precision neutrino flux measurements in conventional neutrino beams

Marcos Dracos IPHC, Université de Strasbourg, CNRS/IN2P3, F Strasbourg, France

Explorations of Neutrino Flux from the NuMI Beam at Different Positions From the Beam Axis

Weak Interactions & Neutral Currents

Theory English (Official)

The FLUKA study of the secondary particles fluence in the AD-Antiproton Decelerator target area.

Tertiary particle production and target optimization of the H2 beam line in

Discovery of the W and Z 0 Bosons

Marcos Dracos IPHC-IN2P3/CNRS Strasbourg. 2 December 2008 M. Dracos, BENE 1

Charged current single pion to quasi-elastic cross section ratio in MiniBooNE. Steven Linden PAVI09 25 June 2009

The ESS neutrino facility for CP violation discovery

New Results for ν µ ν e oscillations in MINOS

New Results from the MINOS Experiment

Charged Current Quasielastic Analysis from MINERνA

arxiv: v1 [hep-ex] 11 May 2017

Accelerators and Colliders

Code inter-comparison and benchmark for muon fluence and absorbed dose induced by an 18 GeV electron beam after massive iron shielding

Preliminary Design of m + m - Higgs Factory Machine-Detector Interface

Lecture 8. CPT theorem and CP violation

Long Baseline Neutrinos

Latest News On NuMI Beam Simulation

500m. 1000m. /POT/GeV/cm 2. (GeV) E ν 10-14

The T2K experiment Results and Perspectives. PPC2017 Corpus Christi Mai 2017 Michel Gonin On behalf of the T2K collaboration

The Hadron Production Experiment at the PS, CERN

arxiv: v1 [nucl-ex] 7 Sep 2009

Detecting ν τ appearance in the spectra of quasielastic CC events

Neutrino physics with the SHiP experiment at CERN

Physics in Italy

1.1 Machine-Detector Interface

HARP (Hadron Production) Experiment at CERN

Neutrino Scattering in Liquid Argon TPC Detectors

Results from the Tevatron: Standard Model Measurements and Searches for the Higgs. Ashutosh Kotwal Duke University

arxiv: v1 [hep-ex] 30 Nov 2009

Accelerators. Acceleration mechanism always electromagnetic Start with what s available: e - or p Significant differences between accelerators of

The reaction p(e,e'p)π 0 to calibrate the Forward and the Large Angle Electromagnetic Shower Calorimeters

Neutrino Physics at MiniBooNE

arxiv:hep-ex/ v1 19 Jun 2004

The discovery of W ± and Z 0 vector-bosons

Hadron Production Experiments and Neutrino Beams

Neutrino-Nucleus Scattering at MINERvA

Latest Results from the OPERA Experiment (and new Charge Reconstruction)

Neutrino mixing II. Can ν e ν µ ν τ? If this happens:

Results from the OPERA experiment in the CNGS beam

arxiv: v1 [hep-ex] 25 Aug 2015

Subcritical Fission Reactor and Neutrino Factory Based on Linear Collider

Analyzing Data. PHY310: Lecture 16. Road Map

High Energy Physics. QuarkNet summer workshop June 24-28, 2013

6-8 February 2017 Hotel do Mar Sesimbra. Hands on Neutrinos

Nuclear effects in neutrino scattering

Results from HARP. Malcolm Ellis On behalf of the HARP collaboration DPF Meeting Riverside, August 2004

Calculation of the Dose Equivalent Rate from Induced Radioactivity Around the CNGS Target and Magnetic Horn

Status and Perspectives for KM3NeT/ORCA

Recent T2K results on CP violation in the lepton sector

Neutrino Oscillations and the Matter Effect

The MERIT High-Power Target Experiment

Physics Potential of existing and future LBL ν beams

Why do we accelerate particles?

Physics 736. Experimental Methods in Nuclear-, Particle-, and Astrophysics. - Accelerator Techniques: Introduction and History -

Advanced Neutrino Sources

THE MERIT HIGH-POWER TARGET EXPERIMENT AT THE CERN PS

K2K and T2K experiments

PoS(NOW2016)003. T2K oscillation results. Lorenzo Magaletti. INFN Sezione di Bari

The First Results of K2K long-baseline Neutrino Oscillation Experiment

Higgs Factory Magnet Protection and Machine-Detector Interface

European Organisation for Nuclear Research European Laboratory for Particle Physics

Update on MOMENT s Target Station Studies

From Here to a Neutrino Factory: Neutrino Oscillations Now and Again

PoS(EPS-HEP2017)238. Experimental limiting factors for the next generation

Neutrino sources. Atmospheric neutrinos Solar neutrinos Supernova neutrinos High energy neutrino sources Cosmic neutrino background

What If U e3 2 < 10 4? Neutrino Factories and Other Matters

Fall Quarter 2010 UCSB Physics 225A & UCSD Physics 214 Homework 1

Long & Very Long Baseline Neutrino Oscillation Studies at Intense Proton Sources. Jeff Nelson College of William & Mary

Tracking properties of the ATLAS Transition Radiation Tracker (TRT)

The ATLAS Detector at the LHC

Neutrino oscillations from CERN to Pyhäsalmi

Recent Results from K2K. Masashi Yokoyama (Kyoto U.) For K2K collaboration 2004 SLAC Summer Institute

MINOS Flux Determination

Bari Osmanov, University of Florida. OscSNS - proposal for neutrino experiment at ORNL SNS facility

Summary of Shielding and Activation analysis for the European Spallation Source Linac Tunnel

Physics sources of noise in ring imaging Cherenkov detectors

Particle Physics with Electronic Detectors

The Multiple Muon Charge Ratio in MINOS Far Detector

Transcription:

CERN - EUROPEAN ORGANISATION FOR NUCLEAR RESEARCH NuFact Note 2000-53 November 23, 2000 Neutrino Fluxes from a Conventional Neutrino Beam using CERN SPL A.Blondel a,m.donegà b1, S.Gilardoni a2 a Département de Physique, Université degenève, Switzerland b Dipartimento di fisica, Universitá degli studi di Milano Abstract This note describes a possible low energy neutrino beam from a horn-focused pion beam generated by 2.2 GeV protons. 1 CERN and Erasmus student at the Université degenève 2 Supported by the CERN Doctoral Student Program.

1 Introduction It has been suggested that a conventional low energy neutrino beam from pion decay could be used to study neutrino oscillations [1], [2].Based on the horn study for pion collection for the neutrino factory [3],[4], the fluxes of neutrinos are calculated here for a decay tunnel of 1 meter radius and 5 to 30 meter length.the SPL proton energy of 2.2 GeV (kinetic energy) was assumed. The advantage of the low energy proton beam is that strange particle production is negligible. 2 System configuration Pions are produced from a proton beam of 2.2 GeV (kinetic energy) impinging on a Hg target and focused with a magnetic horn (see Figure 1). R Pion trajectory 10 cm 1.6 cm Inner conductor 0 30 cm 100 cm Z Figure 1: Focusing system 1

The magnetic horn focuses only π +, while π are defocused (and viceversa reversing the current in the horn).pions and muons decay in a cylindrical decay tunnel of 1 meter radius and 5 to 30 meters length.the fluxes are calculated considering a detector of area A=10 m x 10 m = 100 m 2 at a distance L= 50 km.this solid angle is so small that the flux for different (long) distances can be assumed to scale as A/L 2. Pions are generated and tracked by MARS [5]. Instead of a Monte Carlo simulation, an analytical expression of the decay probabilities has been calculated for both pion and subsequent muon decay and for the probability of neutrinos to reach the detector.muon polarisation has been neglected for this first evaluation. 3 Neutrinos from Pions Each pion is first propagated through the horn (pion decays in the focusing system are not accounted for).the probability to decay in the decay tunnel is then calculated.finally the probability that the neutrino coming from that pion reaches the detector is evaluated. As soon as the particle reaches the walls of the decay tunnel, it is assumed to be absorbed, and no further decay is considered.since pion decay is a two body process only one set of centre of mass decay angle produces a neutrino that reaches the far detector.the analytical formula for the probability that a pion with a certain angle and energy produces a neutrino that reaches the detector is given below.it is assumed that the proton beam and the decay tunnel are in line with the detector and the target.the tunnel radius and length are considered small with respect to the target-detector distance. ( ) P (α, β) = 1 A 4π L 2 1 β 2 (βcosα 1) 2 α = angle between pion trajectory and decay tunnel-detector axis β = speed of the pion (in speed of light units) A = detector area L = distance between decay tunnel and detector 2

4 Neutrinos from Muons Muon decay is a three body process and there is a family of neutrinos of different energies that can reach the detector.the muons produced in pion decay produce neutrinos from the process µ + e + ν e ν µ.the calculation of the flux requires integration over the following variables: - pion decay angles θ and ϕ - pion decay length - neutrino energy in the muon rest frame. This integration is performed by uniform sampling.once these are determined, there is only one set of neutrino angles in the muon rest frame for which the neutrino reaches the detector, and the probability that the muons decay before reaching the walls of the decay tunnel can be readily calculated. The analytical formula for the probability density that a muon with a certain angle and energy produces a ν e or a ν µ that reaches the detector is as follows.it is still assumed that the proton beam and the decay tunnel are in line with the detector and the target.the tunnel radius and length are considered small with respect to the target-detector distance. For µ + ν e (ν µ e + ) dp = 6 A de νl x 2 (1 x) ( ) ( ) 2 1 1 βµ 2 2 dcosθ dϕ 2π L 2 E µ 1+β µcosθν (β µcosδ 1) 2 For µ + ν µ (ν e e + ) dp = 1 A de νl x 2 (3 2x) ( ) ( ) 2 1 1 βµ 2 2 dcosθ dϕ 2π L 2 E µ 1+β µcosθν (β µcosδ 1) 2 with x = 2Eν 1 E µ 1+β µcosθν δ = angle between muon trajectory and decay tunnel-detector axis β µ = speed of the muon (in speed of light units) A = detector area L = distance between decay tunnel and detector θν = angle of the emitted neutrino in the centre of mass of the muon decay E µ,e ν = muon and neutrino energies in the laboratory frame 3

5 Results 5.1 Fluxes for a 30 meter long decay tunnel Figures 2,3,4,5,6,7, are the fluxes of neutrinos reaching a 100 m 2 detector situated at 50 km from the target for a decay tunnel of 30 m length, and a proton beam of 2.2 GeV kinetic energy impinging on a Hg target. The fluxes of neutrinos per 20 MeV bin are given for 10 23 protons (i.e. the number of protons given by the SPL for one year). 5.2 Fluxes for a 5 meter long decay tunnel Figure 8,9,10,11,12,13, are the fluxes of neutrinos reaching a 100 m 2 detector situated at 50 km from the target for a decay tunnel of 5m length, and a proton beam of 2.2 GeV kinetic energy impinging on a Hg target. The fluxes of neutrinos per 20 MeV bin are given for 10 23 protons (i.e. the number of protons given by the SPL for one year). 5.3 Event number In order to illustrate the sensitivity of such a beam for a search of ν µ ν e oscillations we give in Table 5.3 the number of events making the (unphysical) assumptions that: -allν µ oscillates to ν e - ν e do not oscillate The cross section used is 0.710 38 (cm 2 /GeV) E ν (GeV) which is a reasonable approximation of the ν e n e p cross section in the relevant energy range. Events number are calculated for neutrinos reaching a 1 kt detector situated at 50 km from the target, considering 10 23 protons. length of decay tunnel 30 m 20 m 10 m 5m ν µ ν e from π + decay 208 179 119 69 ν e from µ + decay 0.8 0.5 0.2 0.07 Ratio 3.9 10 3 2.8 10 3 1.7 10 3 1.0 10 3 Table 1: Number of events for different decay tunnel lengths. It can be seen that the contamination of the ν e from the beam can be controlled and reduced to 10 3 by reducing the length of the decay tunnel. 4

Figure 2: ν µ from pion decay (π + µ + ν µ ).Flux of neutrinos reaching a 100 m 2 detector situated at 50 km from the target for a decay tunnel of 30 5

Figure 3: ν e from muon decay (µ + e + ν e ν µ ).Flux of neutrinos reaching a 100 m 2 detector situated at 50 km from the target for a decay tunnel of 30 6

Figure 4: ν µ from muon decay (µ + e + ν e ν µ ).Flux of neutrinos reaching a 100 m 2 detector situated at 50 km from the target for a decay tunnel of 30 7

Figure 5: ν µ from pion decay (π µ ν µ ).Flux of neutrinos reaching a 100 m 2 detector situated at 50 km from the target for a decay tunnel of 30 8

Figure 6: ν e from muon decay (µ e ν e ν µ ).Flux of neutrinos reaching a 100 m 2 detector situated at 50 km from the target for a decay tunnel of 30 9

Figure 7: ν µ from muon decay (µ e ν e ν µ ).Flux of neutrinos reaching a 100 m 2 detector situated at 50 km from the target for a decay tunnel of 30 10

Figure 8: ν µ from pion decay (π + µ + ν µ ).Flux of neutrinos reaching a 100 m 2 detector situated at 50 km from the target for a decay tunnel of 5 11

Figure 9: ν e from muon decay (µ + e + ν e ν µ ).Flux of neutrinos reaching a 100 m 2 detector situated at 50 km from the target for a decay tunnel of 5 12

Figure 10: ν µ from muon decay (µ + e + ν e ν µ ).Flux of neutrinos reaching a 100 m 2 detector situated at 50 km from the target for a decay tunnel of 5 13

Figure 11: ν µ from pion decay (π µ ν µ ).Flux of neutrinos reaching a 100 m 2 detector situated at 50 km from the target for a decay tunnel of 5 14

Figure 12: ν e from muon decay (µ e ν e ν µ ).Flux of neutrinos reaching a 100 m 2 detector situated at 50 km from the target for a decay tunnel of 5 15

Figure 13: ν µ from muon decay (µ e ν e ν µ ).Flux of neutrinos reaching a 100 m 2 detector situated at 50 km from the target for a decay tunnel of 5 16

References [1] K.Hübner in Mandate for the Neutrino Factory Working Group for Accelerator Aspects, May 1999, requested in options to be examined : direct neutrino production from π [2] B.Richter, Conventional Beams or Neutrino Factories: The Next Generation of Accelerator-Based Neutrino Experiments, SLAC-PUB-8587 [3] A.Ball et al., Preliminary Magnetic Horn Studies in the Collection Scheme for a Neutrino Factory, proceedings of the NuFact 99, NIM A 451 (2000) 359-361 [4] A.Ball et al., Updated results of the horn study for the Nufact, Nufact Note 42 [5] N.V. Mokhov, The MARS Code System User s Guide, Fermilab-FN-628 (1995) N.V. Mokhov, MARS Code Development, Benchmarking and Applications Fermilab-Conf-00-066(2000) O.E. Krivosheev and N.V. Mokhov, A New MARS and its Applications, Fermilab-Conf-98/43 (1998) N.V. Mokhov, S.I. Striganov, A. Van Ginneken, S.G. Mashnik, A.J. Sierk and J.Ranft, MARS Code Developments, Fermilab-Conf-98/379 (1998) 17