Dr. Back. Nov. 3, 2009

Similar documents
SOLUTIONS TO HOMEWORK ASSIGNMENT #2, Math 253

MATH 2083 FINAL EXAM REVIEW The final exam will be on Wednesday, May 4 from 10:00am-12:00pm.

Chapter 12 Review Vector. MATH 126 (Section 9.5) Vector and Scalar The University of Kansas 1 / 30

MATH UN1201, Section 3 (11:40am 12:55pm) - Midterm 1 February 14, 2018 (75 minutes)

MATH 1020 WORKSHEET 12.1 & 12.2 Vectors in the Plane

Conic Sections in Polar Coordinates

Classification of algebraic surfaces up to fourth degree. Vinogradova Anna

MATH 16C: MULTIVARIATE CALCULUS

e x3 dx dy. 0 y x 2, 0 x 1.

SOLUTIONS TO SECOND PRACTICE EXAM Math 21a, Spring 2003

A. Correct! These are the corresponding rectangular coordinates.

CALCULUS III. Paul Dawkins

Math 251 Midterm II Information Spring 2018

CALC 3 CONCEPT PACKET Complete

Chapter 13: Vectors and the Geometry of Space

Chapter 13: Vectors and the Geometry of Space

FINAL EXAM STUDY GUIDE

Practice problems for Exam 1. a b = (2) 2 + (4) 2 + ( 3) 2 = 29

No calculators, cell phones or any other electronic devices can be used on this exam. Clear your desk of everything excepts pens, pencils and erasers.

1. If the line l has symmetric equations. = y 3 = z+2 find a vector equation for the line l that contains the point (2, 1, 3) and is parallel to l.

Decomposition of Screw-motion Envelopes of Quadrics

PRACTICE PROBLEMS. Please let me know if you find any mistakes in the text so that i can fix them. 1. Mixed partial derivatives.

MLC Practice Final Exam

MA FINAL EXAM Form B December 13, 2016

SOLUTIONS TO PRACTICE EXAM FOR FINAL: 1/13/2002

Preface.

Chapter 10: Conic Sections; Polar Coordinates; Parametric Equations

Lecture 10. (2) Functions of two variables. Partial derivatives. Dan Nichols February 27, 2018

Calculus III. Math 233 Spring Final exam May 3rd. Suggested solutions

Created by T. Madas SURFACE INTEGRALS. Created by T. Madas

FINAL - PART 1 MATH 150 SPRING 2017 KUNIYUKI PART 1: 135 POINTS, PART 2: 115 POINTS, TOTAL: 250 POINTS No notes, books, or calculators allowed.

Lecture Notes for MATH6106. March 25, 2010

Geometry and Motion, MA 134 Week 1

MATH Final Review

Without fully opening the exam, check that you have pages 1 through 12.

Math 21a Homework 24 Solutions Spring, 2014

1 Vectors and the Scalar Product

mathematical objects can be described via equations, functions, graphs, parameterization in R, R, and R.

9/27/2017 FIRST HOURLY PRACTICE 5 Math 21a, Fall Name:

Solutions to Test #1 MATH 2421

7/8/2010 FIRST HOURLY PRACTICE IV Maths 21a, O.Knill, Summer 2010

1 Geometry of R Conic Sections Parametric Equations More Parametric Equations Polar Coordinates...

MSM120 1M1 First year mathematics for civil engineers Revision notes 3

Math 132 Information for Test 2

Solution Sheet 1.4 Questions 26-31

Worksheet 1.7: Introduction to Vector Functions - Position

Revision Checklist. Unit FP3: Further Pure Mathematics 3. Assessment information

Page Points Score Total: 210. No more than 200 points may be earned on the exam.

Further Pure Mathematics 3 GCE Further Mathematics GCE Pure Mathematics and Further Mathematics (Additional) A2 optional unit

Arc Length and Riemannian Metric Geometry

CELESTIAL MECHANICS. Part I. Mathematical Preambles

ENGI 4430 Surface Integrals Page and 0 2 r

Note: Every graph is a level set (why?). But not every level set is a graph. Graphs must pass the vertical line test. (Level sets may or may not.

The Convolution of a Paraboloid and a Parametrized Surface

Study Guide/Practice Exam 3

Major Ideas in Calc 3 / Exam Review Topics

MULTIVARIABLE CALCULUS

Classification of Quadratic Surfaces

The Convolution of a Paraboloid and a Parametrized Surface

Checking your answers in FP3

Gaussian and Mean Curvatures

Solutions for the Practice Final - Math 23B, 2016

Introduction to Three Dimensions

HOMEWORK 7 SOLUTIONS

Math 3c Solutions: Exam 1 Fall Graph by eliiminating the parameter; be sure to write the equation you get when you eliminate the parameter.

B. Incorrect! Presence of all three variables in the equation makes it not cylindrical.

Vector Functions & Space Curves MATH 2110Q

Page Problem Score Max Score a 8 12b a b 10 14c 6 6

Topic 5.6: Surfaces and Surface Elements

MTH 234 Exam 1 February 20th, Without fully opening the exam, check that you have pages 1 through 11.

Multiple Choice Answers. MA 114 Calculus II Spring 2013 Final Exam 1 May Question

Complex Trigonometric and Hyperbolic Functions (7A)

Without fully opening the exam, check that you have pages 1 through 11.

3. Interpret the graph of x = 1 in the contexts of (a) a number line (b) 2-space (c) 3-space

Geometric Modelling Summer 2016

Math 302 Outcome Statements Winter 2013

Conic Sections and Polar Graphing Lab Part 1 - Circles

Math 2E Selected Problems for the Final Aaron Chen Spring 2016

Calculus with Analytic Geometry 3 Fall 2018

Week 4: Differentiation for Functions of Several Variables

Things you should have learned in Calculus II

6.7 Hyperbolic Functions

Conic Sections Session 3: Hyperbola

Center of Gravity and a Characterization of Parabolas

O.K. But what if the chicken didn t have access to a teleporter.

General Technical Remarks on PDE s and Boundary Conditions Kurt Bryan MA 436

Spacecraft Dynamics and Control

Math 122 Test 3. April 15, 2014

Review Sheet for the Final

OHSx XM521 Multivariable Differential Calculus: Homework Solutions 13.1

Solutions to Laplace s Equations

Review for the First Midterm Exam

1 Vectors and 3-Dimensional Geometry

Linear Algebra. Chapter 8: Eigenvalues: Further Applications and Computations Section 8.2. Applications to Geometry Proofs of Theorems.

Friday 09/15/2017 Midterm I 50 minutes

Ma 1c Practical - Solutions to Homework Set 7

7.3 Hyperbolic Functions Hyperbolic functions are similar to trigonometric functions, and have the following

In general, the formula is S f ds = D f(φ(u, v)) Φ u Φ v da. To compute surface area, we choose f = 1. We compute

SOME PROBLEMS YOU SHOULD BE ABLE TO DO

AP CALCULUS AB. Summer Assignment. Page 1

Transcription:

Dr. Back Nov. 3, 2009

Please Don t Rely on this File! In you re expected to work on these topics mostly without computer aid. But seeing a few better pictures can help understanding the concepts. A copy of this file is at http://www.math.cornell.edu/ back/m1920

Paraboloid z = x 2 + 4y 2 The graph z = F (x, y) can always be parameterized by r(u, v) =< u, v, F (u, v) >.

Paraboloid z = x 2 + 4y 2 The graph z = F (x, y) can always be parameterized by r(u, v) =< u, v, F (u, v) >. Parameters u and v just different names for x and y resp.

Paraboloid z = x 2 + 4y 2 The graph z = F (x, y) can always be parameterized by r(u, v) =< u, v, F (u, v) >. Use this idea if you can t think of something better.

Paraboloid z = x 2 + 4y 2 The graph z = F (x, y) can always be parameterized by r(u, v) =< u, v, F (u, v) >.

Note the curves where u and v are constant are visible in the wireframe. Paraboloid z = x 2 + 4y 2 The graph z = F (x, y) can always be parameterized by r(u, v) =< u, v, F (u, v) >.

Paraboloid z = x 2 + 4y 2 A trigonometric parametrization will often be better if you have to calculate a surface integral.

Paraboloid z = x 2 + 4y 2 A trigonometric parametrization will often be better if you have to calculate a surface integral. r(u, v) =< 2u cos v, u sin v, 4u 2 >.

Paraboloid z = x 2 + 4y 2 A trigonometric parametrization will often be better if you have to calculate a surface integral. r(u, v) =< 2u cos v, u sin v, 4u 2 >.

Paraboloid z = x 2 + 4y 2 A trigonometric parametrization will often be better if you have to calculate a surface integral. r(u, v) =< 2u cos v, u sin v, 4u 2 >. Algebraically, we are rescaling the algebra behind polar coordinates where x = r cos θ y = r sin θ leads to r 2 = x 2 + y 2.

Paraboloid z = x 2 + 4y 2 A trigonometric parametrization will often be better if you have to calculate a surface integral. r(u, v) =< 2u cos v, u sin v, 4u 2 >. Here we want x 2 + 4y 2 to be simple. So x = y = 2r cos θ r sin θ will do better.

Paraboloid z = x 2 + 4y 2 A trigonometric parametrization will often be better if you have to calculate a surface integral. r(u, v) =< 2u cos v, u sin v, 4u 2 >. Here we want x 2 + 4y 2 to be simple. So x = y = 2r cos θ r sin θ will do better. Plug x and y into z = x 2 + 4y 2 to get the z-component.

Parabolic Cylinder z = x 2 Graph parametrizations are often optimal for parabolic cylinders.

Parabolic Cylinder z = x 2 r(u, v) =< u, v, u 2 >

Parabolic Cylinder z = x 2 r(u, v) =< u, v, u 2 >

Parabolic Cylinder z = x 2 r(u, v) =< u, v, u 2 > One of the parameters (v) is giving us the extrusion direction. The parameter u is just being used to describe the curve z = x 2 in the zx plane.

Elliptic Cylinder x 2 + 2z 2 = 6 The trigonometric trick is often good for elliptic cylinders

Elliptic Cylinder x 2 + 2z 2 = 6 r(u, v) =< 3 2 cos v, u, 3 sin v >=< 6 cos v, u, 3 sin v >

Elliptic Cylinder x 2 + 2z 2 = 6 r(u, v) =< 6 cos v, u, 3 sin v >

Elliptic Cylinder x 2 + 2z 2 = 6 r(u, v) =< 6 cos v, u, 3 sin v >

Elliptic Cylinder x 2 + 2z 2 = 6 r(u, v) =< 6 cos v, u, 3 sin v >

Elliptic Cylinder x 2 + 2z 2 = 6 r(u, v) =< 6 cos v, u, 3 sin v > What happened here is we started with the polar coordinate idea x = r cos θ z = r sin θ but noted that the algebra wasn t right for x 2 + 2z 2 so shifted to x = 2r cos θ z = r sin θ

Elliptic Cylinder x 2 + 2z 2 = 6 r(u, v) =< 6 cos v, u, 3 sin v > x = z = 2r cos θ r sin θ makes the left hand side work out to 2r 2 which will be 6 when r = 3.

Ellipsoid x 2 + 2y 2 + 3z 2 = 4 A similar trick occurs for using spherical coordinate ideas in parameterizing ellipsoids.

Ellipsoid x 2 + 2y 2 + 3z 2 = 4 A similar trick occurs for using spherical coordinate ideas in parameterizing ellipsoids. r(u, v) =< 2 sin u cos v, 2 sin u sin v, 4 3 cos u >

Ellipsoid x 2 + 2y 2 + 3z 2 = 4 r(u, v) =< 2 sin u cos v, 2 sin u sin v, 4 3 cos u >

Hyperbolic Cylinder x 2 z 2 = 4 You may have run into the hyperbolic functions cosh x = ex + e x 2 sinh x = ex e x 2

Hyperbolic Cylinder x 2 z 2 = 4 You may have run into the hyperbolic functions cosh x = ex + e x 2 sinh x = ex e x 2 Just as cos 2 θ + sin 2 θ = 1 helps with ellipses, the hyperbolic version cosh 2 θ sinh 2 θ = 1 leads to the nicest hyperbola parameterizations.

Hyperbolic Cylinder x 2 z 2 = 4 Just as cos 2 θ + sin 2 θ = 1 helps with ellipses, the hyperbolic version cosh 2 θ sinh 2 θ = 1 leads to the nicest hyperbola parameterizations. r(u, v) =< 2 sinh v, u, 2 cosh v >

Hyperbolic Cylinder x 2 z 2 = 4 r(u, v) =< 2 sinh v, u, 2 cosh v >

Saddle z = x 2 y 2 The hyperbolic trick also works with saddles

Saddle z = x 2 y 2 r(u, v) =< u cosh v, u sinh v, u 2 >

Saddle z = x 2 y 2 r(u, v) =< u cosh v, u sinh v, u 2 >

Hyperboloid of 1 Sheet x 2 + y 2 z 2 = 1 The spherical coordinate idea for ellipsoids with sin φ replaced by cosh u works well here.

Hyperboloid of 1 Sheet x 2 + y 2 z 2 = 1 r(u, v) =< cosh u cos v, cosh u sin v, sinh u >

Hyperboloid of 1 Sheet x 2 + y 2 z 2 = 1

Hyperboloid of 2-Sheets x 2 + y 2 z 2 = 1

Hyperboloid of 2-Sheets x 2 + y 2 z 2 = 1 r(u, v) =< sinh u cos v, sinh u sin v, cosh u >

Hyperboloid of 2-Sheets x 2 + y 2 z 2 = 1

Top Part of Cone z 2 = x 2 + y 2 So z = x 2 + y 2.

Top Part of Cone z 2 = x 2 + y 2 So z = x 2 + y 2. The polar coordinate idea leads to r(u, v) =< u cos v, u sin v, u >

Top Part of Cone z 2 = x 2 + y 2 So z = x 2 + y 2. The polar coordinate idea leads to r(u, v) =< u cos v, u sin v, u >