Conjectures in Cournot Duopoly under Cost Uncertainty

Similar documents
3.2. Cournot Model Cournot Model

Endogenous timing in a mixed oligopoly consisting of a single public firm and foreign competitors. Abstract

Economics 101. Lecture 4 - Equilibrium and Efficiency

Hila Etzion. Min-Seok Pang

Constant Best-Response Functions: Interpreting Cournot

Welfare Properties of General Equilibrium. What can be said about optimality properties of resource allocation implied by general equilibrium?

Welfare Analysis of Cournot and Bertrand Competition With(out) Investment in R & D

Online Appendix. t=1 (p t w)q t. Then the first order condition shows that

The Multiple Classical Linear Regression Model (CLRM): Specification and Assumptions. 1. Introduction

Market structure and Innovation

,, MRTS is the marginal rate of technical substitution

The Second Anti-Mathima on Game Theory

Managing Capacity Through Reward Programs. on-line companion page. Byung-Do Kim Seoul National University College of Business Administration

Environmental taxation: Privatization with Different Public Firm s Objective Functions

How Strong Are Weak Patents? Joseph Farrell and Carl Shapiro. Supplementary Material Licensing Probabilistic Patents to Cournot Oligopolists *

Pricing and Resource Allocation Game Theoretic Models

Quantity Precommitment and Cournot and Bertrand Models with Complementary Goods

Stanford University CS359G: Graph Partitioning and Expanders Handout 4 Luca Trevisan January 13, 2011

University of California, Davis Date: June 22, 2009 Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics. PRELIMINARY EXAMINATION FOR THE Ph.D.

Econ107 Applied Econometrics Topic 3: Classical Model (Studenmund, Chapter 4)

Module 3 LOSSY IMAGE COMPRESSION SYSTEMS. Version 2 ECE IIT, Kharagpur

Supporting Materials for: Two Monetary Models with Alternating Markets

Perfect Competition and the Nash Bargaining Solution

Supporting Information for: Two Monetary Models with Alternating Markets

A NOTE ON CES FUNCTIONS Drago Bergholt, BI Norwegian Business School 2011

PROBLEM SET 7 GENERAL EQUILIBRIUM

COS 521: Advanced Algorithms Game Theory and Linear Programming

Lecture Notes, January 11, 2010

Chapter 5. Solution of System of Linear Equations. Module No. 6. Solution of Inconsistent and Ill Conditioned Systems

CS286r Assign One. Answer Key

Volume 31, Issue 1. The Stackelberg equilibrium as a consistent conjectural equilibrium

Investment Secrecy and Competitive R&D

(1 ) (1 ) 0 (1 ) (1 ) 0

f(x,y) = (4(x 2 4)x,2y) = 0 H(x,y) =

2E Pattern Recognition Solutions to Introduction to Pattern Recognition, Chapter 2: Bayesian pattern classification

3.1 Expectation of Functions of Several Random Variables. )' be a k-dimensional discrete or continuous random vector, with joint PMF p (, E X E X1 E X

Credit Card Pricing and Impact of Adverse Selection

k t+1 + c t A t k t, t=0

Lectures - Week 4 Matrix norms, Conditioning, Vector Spaces, Linear Independence, Spanning sets and Basis, Null space and Range of a Matrix

Mergers among leaders and mergers among followers. Abstract

Kernel Methods and SVMs Extension

Equilibrium with Complete Markets. Instructor: Dmytro Hryshko

Online Appendix: Reciprocity with Many Goods

Infinitely Split Nash Equilibrium Problems in Repeated Games

Lecture Notes on Linear Regression

Statistics for Economics & Business

A General Model of Information Sharing in Oligopoly

On endogenous Stackelberg leadership: The case of horizontally differentiated duopoly and asymmetric net work compatibility effects

The oligopolistic markets

Stat260: Bayesian Modeling and Inference Lecture Date: February 22, Reference Priors

ON A DETERMINATION OF THE INITIAL FUNCTIONS FROM THE OBSERVED VALUES OF THE BOUNDARY FUNCTIONS FOR THE SECOND-ORDER HYPERBOLIC EQUATION

Inner Product. Euclidean Space. Orthonormal Basis. Orthogonal

Price competition with capacity constraints. Consumers are rationed at the low-price firm. But who are the rationed ones?

COMPARISON OF SOME RELIABILITY CHARACTERISTICS BETWEEN REDUNDANT SYSTEMS REQUIRING SUPPORTING UNITS FOR THEIR OPERATIONS

Mixed Taxation and Production Efficiency

Physics 5153 Classical Mechanics. D Alembert s Principle and The Lagrangian-1

Estimation: Part 2. Chapter GREG estimation

ECE559VV Project Report

Power law and dimension of the maximum value for belief distribution with the max Deng entropy

ANSWERS. Problem 1. and the moment generating function (mgf) by. defined for any real t. Use this to show that E( U) var( U)

Games of Threats. Elon Kohlberg Abraham Neyman. Working Paper

Problem Set 4: Sketch of Solutions

Econ Statistical Properties of the OLS estimator. Sanjaya DeSilva

Simulated Power of the Discrete Cramér-von Mises Goodness-of-Fit Tests

Complete subgraphs in multipartite graphs

Uncertainty in measurements of power and energy on power networks

The Order Relation and Trace Inequalities for. Hermitian Operators

Linear Regression Analysis: Terminology and Notation

Bayesian predictive Configural Frequency Analysis

Lecture 3: Probability Distributions

The Minimum Universal Cost Flow in an Infeasible Flow Network

Norm Bounds for a Transformed Activity Level. Vector in Sraffian Systems: A Dual Exercise

CS294 Topics in Algorithmic Game Theory October 11, Lecture 7

MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY 6.265/15.070J Fall 2013 Lecture 12 10/21/2013. Martingale Concentration Inequalities and Applications

CHAPTER 5 NUMERICAL EVALUATION OF DYNAMIC RESPONSE

Analyzing Consumer s Behaviour in Risk and Uncertainty Situations

ELASTIC WAVE PROPAGATION IN A CONTINUOUS MEDIUM

Copyright (C) 2008 David K. Levine This document is an open textbook; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under the terms of the Creative

Economics 2450A: Public Economics Section 10: Education Policies and Simpler Theory of Capital Taxation

Lecture 4: November 17, Part 1 Single Buffer Management

The internal structure of natural numbers and one method for the definition of large prime numbers

1 The Sidrauski model

Games and Market Imperfections

Assortment Optimization under MNL

Ph 219a/CS 219a. Exercises Due: Wednesday 23 October 2013

e - c o m p a n i o n

Uniqueness of Nash Equilibrium in Private Provision of Public Goods: Extension. Nobuo Akai *

College of Computer & Information Science Fall 2009 Northeastern University 20 October 2009

Module 17: Mechanism Design & Optimal Auctions

Week3, Chapter 4. Position and Displacement. Motion in Two Dimensions. Instantaneous Velocity. Average Velocity

Maximizing the number of nonnegative subsets

Cournot Equilibrium with N firms

NUMERICAL DIFFERENTIATION

Appendix for Causal Interaction in Factorial Experiments: Application to Conjoint Analysis

The Expectation-Maximization Algorithm

4 Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) 5 ANOVA. 5.1 Introduction. 5.2 Fixed Effects ANOVA

Economics 130. Lecture 4 Simple Linear Regression Continued

The lower and upper bounds on Perron root of nonnegative irreducible matrices

Ryan (2009)- regulating a concentrated industry (cement) Firms play Cournot in the stage. Make lumpy investment decisions

Discontinuous Extraction of a Nonrenewable Resource

Transcription:

Conjectures n Cournot Duopoly under Cost Uncertanty Suyeol Ryu and Iltae Km * Ths paper presents a Cournot duopoly model based on a condton when frms are facng cost uncertanty under rsk neutralty and rsk averson. Each frm conjectures about the rval s output level, and ts cost functon s assumed to be unknown to ts rval. The Cournot model shows that the expected utlty maxmzng frms, under rsk averson, show dfferent behavors from the expected proft maxmzng frms. Ths mples that each frm can ncrease or decrease ts output, whch depends on the nteracton between both frms under cost uncertanty, assumng that both frms are rskaverse. Keywords: Cournot equlbrum, Cost uncertanty, Rsk averson JEL Classfcaton: D8, L3 I. Introducton Economsts have extensvely analyzed the effects of uncertanty on the optmzng behavor of a sngle agent. These economsts nclude Sandmo (970, 97), Leland (97), Cheng et al. (987), Feder (977), Meyer and Ormston (985), and Km et al. (005). Sandmo (97) has specfcally conducted a systematc study of the theory of the frm under prce uncertanty and rsk averson. He has argued that the uncertanty effect on the optmal output level of rsk-averse frm s negatve. Dardanon (988) has ntroduced a unfed framework for the analyss *Assstant Professor, Department of Economcs, Andong Natonal Unversty, Andong 760-749, Korea, (Tel) +8-54-80-609, (Fax) +8-54-83-63, (E-mal) syryu@andong.ac.kr; Correspondng Author, Professor, Department of Economcs, Chonnam Natonal Unversty, Gwangju 500-757, Korea, (Tel) +8-6-530-550, (Fax) +8-6-530-559, (E-mal) kt603@chonnam.ac.kr, respectvely. The authors wsh to thank two anonymous referees for ther useful comments. [Seoul Journal of Economcs 0, Vol. 4, No. ]

74 SEOUL JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS of two-argument utlty functon wth a random budget constrant and presented the effect of uncertanty on an agent under plausble normalty condtons. Hs analyss showed that the optmal level of the choce varable ncreases for mean-preservng ncreases n rsk n the dstrbuton of the random parameter f the absolute rsk averson ncreases. Hs results are appled n dervng the rules for effcent taxaton under uncertanty. Prevous studes on the duopoly model under uncertanty have assumed that each frm s rsk-neutral and can share or exchange ts nformaton on market uncertanty wth ts rval. Examples of such studes nclude those of Bresnahan (98), Clarke (983a, 983b), Gal- Or (986), Krby (988), L (985), Novshek and Sonnenschen (98), Saka (990, 99), Saka and Yamato (989), Shapro (986), and Vves (984). They have nvestgated how market uncertanty wth ether unknown market demand or unknown constant margnal cost affects frms behavor. Ths paper ntroduces cost uncertanty n a smple Cournot duopoly model and extends prevous analyses n two drectons. Frst, we assume that there s no nformaton sharng or exchange between frms. Each frm does not know the other frm s cost functon at the tme the output s produced. In a Cournot duopoly game, Frm s optmal output choce depends on ts own cost functon and Frm j s output choce, whch also depends on ts cost functon and Frm s output choce (ths type of relatonshp goes on). Ths mples that, n equlbrum, each frm s optmal output depends on the other frm s cost functon as well as ts own cost functon. Therefore, wth uncertanty, each frm has to use ts belefs on the other frm s cost functon, and these belefs can be summarzed n ts own subjectve probablty dstrbuton. Second, we assume that frms are rsk-averse. We show that under rsk neutralty, the wellknown Cournot equlbrum vares based on the assumpton on the objectve functons of the frms. We also demonstrate that the expected utlty maxmzng frms under rsk averson show dfferent behavors from the expected proft maxmzng frms. We adopt the Sandmo s approach (97) to compare the uncertanty case wth the certanty one. The equlbrum output under cost functon uncertanty s lesser or greater than one under certanty, n whch t depends on each frm s conjecture about the other frm s output level. Ths paper s organzed nto sectons. Secton presents our basc duopoly model and analyzes the expected proft maxmzng behavors n t. Secton 3 nvestgates the expected utlty maxmzng behavors

CONJECTURES IN COURNOT DUOPOLY UNDER COST UNCERTAINTY 75 and compares the results wth the certanty case. Fnally, Secton 4 dscusses the concludng remarks. II. Basc Model We consder a smple Cournot duopoly model n whch two frms producng dentcal products face a market demand. The nverse demand functon s derved through P=a-q -q j, where q and q j denote the amount of output produced by Frms and j, respectvely, the demand ntercept s a, and the slope of market demand s one for smplcty. We assume that technology exhbts constant returns to scale, so that Frm has constant unt cost c wth c >0. We brefly repeat the well-known results under certanty n whch the cost functons are exactly known to each other, for comparson wth later results under cost uncertanty. The proft of Frm s descrbed as π = ( a q qj c) q, for, j=, j. () The frst-order condton for proft maxmzaton through () by Frm s π q = a q qj c = 0. () The second-order condton s always satsfed because π q = < 0. (3) From Equaton (), the optmal reacton functon for Frm s derved through q = ( a c qj ). (4) c Therefore, the unque Cournot equlbrum for Frm, q through: s derved

76 SEOUL JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS c q = ( a c + c j ), for, j=, j. (5) 3 We then ntroduce the uncertanty through randomness n the cost functon. Each frm knows exactly ts own constant margnal cost but has partal nformaton only on the other frm s margnal cost. That s, each frm has ts subjectve probablty dstrbuton on the other frm s constant margnal cost. We consder the symmetrc uncertanty n whch both frms have uncertan nformaton on the other frm s margnal cost. Before proceedng, we defne the random varables to dstngush them from the nonrandom varables n the followng way: q j Ω, c j Ω, and π Ω j, for, j=, j, where Ω s the set of nformaton avalable to Frm. III. Expected Proft Maxmzng Behavor (Symmetrc Uncertanty) Each frm s rsk-neutral and chooses ts output to maxmze ts expected proft based on ts prvate nformaton. Frm s expected proft gven ts prvate nformaton, Ω, s derved through: { } E( π Ω ) = E ( a q q c Ω ) q j { ( )} = a q c E qj Ω q for, j=, j, (6) where E s the expectatons operator. The frst-order condton of (6) s E( π Ω ) q = a q c E( q Ω ) = 0. (7) j The second-order condton s always satsfed because E( π Ω ) q = < 0. (8) The optmal reacton functons from the frst-order condtons for both

CONJECTURES IN COURNOT DUOPOLY UNDER COST UNCERTAINTY 77 frms are derved through: q = { a c E( q Ω ) } (9) and q = { a c E( q Ω ) }. (0) The unque Cournot equlbrum s derved from solvng Equatons (9) and (0) smultaneously. However, the equlbrum can vary, dependng on each frm s expectaton, E(q Ω j ). Frm can only expect Frm s reacton wth ts prvate nformaton through Eq ( Ω ) = E a c Eq ( Ω) Ω { } = ( ) ( ). a E c Ω E E q Ω Ω () If we assume that both frms have ther prvate nformaton, Frm s expectaton on Frm s reacton, E(q Ω ), s located between the upper bound [E(q Ω )] u and the lower bound [E(q Ω )] l. Therefore, Frm s optmal output, q *, s q mn q * q max. Smlarly, Frm s expectaton on Frm s reacton, E(q Ω ), s located between [E(q Ω )] u, and [E(q Ω )] l, and ts optmal output, q *, s q mn q * q max. Therefore, the possble Cournot equlbrum for ths uncertanty game s shown n Fgure. The pont A represents an equlbrum pont wth (q c, q c ) beng the par of equlbrum output strateges f both frms have perfect nformaton on the constant margnal cost of ther rvals. The equlbrum s shown n the box of dashed lnes f both frms face cost uncertanty. There are multple equlbrum output strateges for

78 SEOUL JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS FIGURE COURNOT DUOPOLY EQUILIBRIA UNDER SYMMETRIC UNCERTAINTY two frms n ths case. Let us then look at how the Cournot equlbrum can be derved. Consder Equatons (9) and (0), whch have four unknowns, q, q, E(q Ω ), and E(q Ω ). We can solve the problem through an teratve substtuton method. q = + ( ) 3 a c + E E c 3 Ωj Ω + + Ec ( ) ( ). j Ω + E E Ec 4 j Ω Ωj Ω + () We assume that the nformaton set of each frm s exclusve to each other to smplfy the expresson: Assumpton : Let Frm j s expectaton on c be wrtten as, E(c Ω j )=c +b, where b s assumed to be a small (relatve to c ) non-systematc bas. Ths mples that Frm s expectaton on Frm j s expectatonal bas, b, s zero: E(b Ω )=0. Then

CONJECTURES IN COURNOT DUOPOLY UNDER COST UNCERTAINTY 79 EEc [ ( Ω ) Ω ] = E[( c + b) Ω ] = c + Eb ( Ω ) = c j E{ E[ E( c Ω ) Ω ] Ω } = E[ E( c Ω ) Ω ] = c j j E{ EEc [ ( Ω ) Ω ] Ω } = Ec ( Ω ) = c + b. j j j The equlbrum output, usng Assumpton and Equaton (), s derved through q* = a c + ( c j + bj). (3) 3 Let the maxmum and mnmum values for the bas, b j be denoted by b j u and b j l, respectvely, so the equlbrum output for frm, q *, s resolved as q mn q * q max, where q mn =/3[a-c +(c j +b j l )]=q c +(/3)b j l, q max =q c +(/3)b j u, and q c means the Cournot equlbrum output of Frm wthout cost uncertanty. Ths mples that f Frm s expectaton on c j s greater (smaller) than real c j, then Frm s equlbrum output, q *, s greater (smaller) than the certanty equlbrum output, q c. Frm j s expectaton on Frm s reacton s also bounded as Eq ( ) j Eq ( j) Eq ( j) Ω Ω Ω, u (4) where Eq ( Ω j) = a ( c + b ) q j and u u Eq ( ) j a ( c b ) q Ω = + j. IV. Expected Utlty Maxmzng Behavor (Symmetrc Uncertanty) We brefly ntroduce the Sandmo s approach before proceedng. Sandmo (97) has studed the theory of the compettve frm under prce uncertanty and rsk averson. The expected utlty of profts can be wrtten as [ ] [ ] E u( π ) = E u( px C( x) B), (5)

80 SEOUL JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS where p s the prce of output and a random varable wth the expected value E(p)=μ, the varable cost C(x) and the fxed cost B. The frst-order condton of Equaton (5) s [ π ] E u( )( p C ( x)) = 0. (6) E(p)=μ s the prce under certanty to compare wth the level of output under certanty. Equaton (6) can be wrtten as [ π ] [ π ] E u( ) p = E u( ) C ( x). (7) Subtractng E[u (π)μ] from each sde of Equaton (7), we derve [ π μ ] [ π μ ] E u( )( p ) = E u( )( C ( x) ). (8) We derve that π=e[π]+(p-μ)x because E[π]=μ x-c(x)-b. Clearly, [ π] u ( π) u ( E ) f p μ. (9) It mmedately follows that [ ] u ( π)( p μ) u ( E π )( p μ). (0) Ths nequalty holds for all p. The nequalty sgn of Equaton (9) s reversed for p μ. However, multplyng both sdes of the nequalty by (p-μ) wll stll hold the nequalty of (0). Takng expectatons on both sdes of (0) and notng that E[u (π)] s a gven number, we obtan [ ] [ ] E u( π)( p μ) u( E π ) E( p μ). However, the rght-hand sde s equal to zero by defnton; hence, the left-hand sde s negatve. We then know that the rght-hand sde of (8) s also negatve. Meanwhle, Equaton (8) can be wrtten as [ π ] E u ( ) ( C ( x) μ) 0,

CONJECTURES IN COURNOT DUOPOLY UNDER COST UNCERTAINTY 8 and ths mples C ( x) μ () because margnal utlty s always postve. Therefore, output under prce uncertanty s smaller than the certanty output. We now assume that both frms are rsk-averse (u >0 and u <0). The objectve functon of the expected utlty maxmzng Frm s { } E u( π Ω ) = E u ( a q qj c Ω) q. () The frst- and second-order condtons of () can be wrtten as ( ) E u ( π Ω) a q c ( qj Ω ) = 0 (3) and E{ u ( π Ω ) a q c ( q j Ω) u ( π Ω )} < 0 (4) because the second-order condton s always satsfed for the rskaverse frms, u ( )>0 and u <0. E[u (π Ω )(a-q -c )]=E[u (π Ω )(q j Ω )] s derved from the frstorder condton (3). Subtractng E[u (π Ω )E(q j Ω )] from both sdes, we then derve E u ( π )[ a q c E( qj )] E{ u Ω Ω = ( π Ω)[ qj Ω E( qj Ω)]}. (5) We know that: π Ω = ( a q c qj Ω ) q and E( π Ω ) = a q c E( qj Ω) q. Therefore, π Ω E( π Ω ) = qj E( qj ) Ω Ω q.

8 SEOUL JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS Clearly, t follows that u ( π Ω) u E( π Ω), f qj Ω E( qj Ω). The followng nequalty now holds for all q j Ω, u ( π Ω ) qj E( qj ) u E( π ) qj E( qj ) Ω Ω Ω Ω Ω. Takng expectatons on both sdes, we derve E{ u ( π Ω )[ q Ω E( q Ω )]} E{ u [ E( π Ω )][ q Ω E( q Ω )]} j j j j = u [ E( π Ω )][ E( q Ω ) E( q Ω )] = 0. j j (6) From Equatons (5) and (6), we derve E{ u ( π Ω )[ a q c E( q Ω )]} j = [ a q c E( q Ω )] E[ u ( π Ω )] 0. j (7) Ths mples that the followng nequaltes must be satsfed for optmal decson: q a c E( q Ω) (8) and q a c E( q Ω). (9) The present model shows that each frm does n fact react to the other n a way that depends on conjectures based on ts nformaton. Let r j be Frm s response to the change n Frm j s output level. r j s equal to -(/) under certanty but r j s equal to and less than -(/) under cost uncertanty. Ths means that f Frm j reduces ts output by

CONJECTURES IN COURNOT DUOPOLY UNDER COST UNCERTAINTY 83 unt, Frm ncreases ts output by equal to and less than / unt. Ths makes Frm s reacton functon to move nward by k (=, ) under cost uncertanty (compared wth certanty stuaton). Let k be the amount of output, q whch s reduced under cost uncertanty by Frm. We follow the Sandmo s approach (97) and the certanty equlbrum output, q c, can be compared wth the uncertanty equlbrum output, q *, when b =b j =0. Equatons (8) and (9), f b =b j =0, become q = ( a c q ) k (30) q = ( a c q ) k. (3) Equatons (30) and (3) show that reacton curves of both frms under cost uncertanty are nsde ther certanty reacton curves. Solvng (30) and (3), the equlbrum outputs under cost uncertanty are * c 4 q = q + k k (3) 3 3 * c 4 q = q + k k, (33) 3 3 where q c s the Cournot equlbrum output under certanty. Let k j /k be the relatve sze of the amount of output from both frms (reduced under cost uncertanty). The values of k s measure the dfference of the frms reacton between uncertanty and certanty. Uncertanty n the cost functon s generated by random elements, such as uncertanty delvery and tmng of nputs, uncertan prces of nput factors, and uncertan technologcal relatonshp between nput and output. Therefore, these rsk factors affect the rato. We derve three possble cases, when compared wth the results under certanty stuaton (Fgure ). The followng theorem s derved after solvng (3) and (33). Theorem Supposng that both frms are rsk-averse, there exst three Cournot

84 SEOUL JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS FIGURE COURNOT DUOPOLY EQUILIBRIA UNDER RISK AVERSION equlbrum cases under cost uncertanty: Case : If k k, then q * q c c and q * q k Case : If 0 k Case 3: If (representng Area K n Fgure ). k k >, then q *<q c c and q *>q (representng Area L n Fgure )., then q *>q c c and q *<q (representng Area M n Fgure ). The equlbrum output level under cost uncertanty depends on the relatve sze of k and k, that s, the nteractve behavor of both frms. The followngs are observed f the results are compared wth the results under certanty: () both frms reduce ther optmal level of output n Case ; () Frm ncreases ts optmal output whereas Frm reduces ts optmal output n Case ; and () Frm decreases ts optmal

CONJECTURES IN COURNOT DUOPOLY UNDER COST UNCERTAINTY 85 output whereas Frm ncreases ts optmal output n Case 3. V. Concludng Remarks Ths paper presents a Cournot duopoly model based on a stuaton when frms are facng cost uncertanty under rsk neutralty and rsk averson, and compares the results wth certanty case. The Cournot duopoly model shows that the expected utlty maxmzng frms show dfferent behavors from the expected proft maxmzng frms under cost uncertanty. A comparson wth the results under certanty shows that each rsk-averse frm can ncrease or decrease ts output, whch depends on the nteracton between both frms under cost uncertanty. (Receved 4 February 00; Revsed 6 August 00; Accepted 5 August 00) References Bresnahan, T. F. Duopoly Models wth Consstent Conjectures. Amercan Economc Revew 7 (No. 5 98): 934-45. Cheng, H. C., Magll, M., and Shafer, W. Some Results on Comparatve Statcs under Uncertanty. Internatonal Economc Revew 8 (No. 987): 493-507. Clarke, R. N. Colluson and the Incentves for Informaton Sharng. Bell Journal of Economcs 4 (No. 983a): 383-94.. Duopolst Don t Wsh to Share Informaton. Economcs Letters (Nos. - 983b): 33-6. Dardanon, V. Optmal Choces under Uncertanty: the Case of Two- Argument Utlty Functons. Economc Journal 98 (No. 39 988): We need a strong assumpton (for example, that a rsk-neutral Frm s expectaton on a rsk-neutral Frm j s reacton, E(q j Ω ) s the same as a rskaverse Frm s expectaton on a rsk-averse Frm j s reacton), so we can compare a rsk-neutral frm s behavor wth a rsk-averse frm s behavor under symmetrc uncertanty. That s, b j under rsk neutralty s the same as that under rsk averson. The result n ths case s smlar to that of comparng a rsk-averse frm under certanty wth a rsk-averse frm under uncertanty. Note that we cannot compare a rsk-neutral frm s behavor wth a rsk-averse frm s behavor under symmetrc uncertanty f a rsk-neutral Frm s expectaton on a rsk-neutral Frm j s reacton, E(q j Ω ), s dfferent from a rsk-averse Frm s expectaton on a rsk-averse Frm j s reacton.

86 SEOUL JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS 49-50. Feder, G. The Impact of Uncertanty n a Class of Objectve Functons. Journal of Economc Theory 6 (No. 977): 504-. Gal-Or, E. Informaton Transmsson-Cournot and Bertrand Equlbra. Revew of Economc Studes 53 (No. 986): 85-9. Km, Soojong, Km, Iltae, and Ryu, Suyeol. Left-sde Relatvely Strong Increases n Rsk and Ther Comparatve Statcs. Seoul Journal of Economcs 8 (No. 005): 45-57. Krby, A. Trade Assocatons as Informaton Exchange Mechansm. The RAND Journal of Economcs 9 (No. 988): 38-46. Leland, H. E. The Theory of the Frm Facng Uncertan Demand. Amercan Economc Revew 6 (No. 3 97): 78-9. L, L. Cournot Olgopoly wth Informaton Sharng. The RAND Journal of Economcs 6 (No. 4 985): 5-36. Meyer, J., and Ormston, M. Strong Increase n Rsk and Ther Comparatve Statcs. Internatonal Economc Revew 6 (No. 985): 45-37. Novshek, W., and Sonnenschen, H. Fulflled Expectatons Cournot Duopoly wth Informaton Acquston and Release. Bell Journal of Economcs 3 (No. 98): 4-8. Saka, Y. Informaton Sharng n Olgopoly: Overvew and Evaluaton. Part I. Alternatve Models wth a Common Rsk. Keo Economc Studes 7 (No. 990): 7-4.. Informaton Sharng n Olgopoly: Overvew and Evaluaton. Part II. Prvate Rsks and Olgopoly Models. Keo Economc Studes 8 (No. 99): 5-7. Saka, Y., and Yamato, T. Olgopoly, Informaton and Welfare. Journal of Economcs 49 (No. 989): 3-4. Sandmo, A. The Effect of Uncertanty on Savng Decsons. Revew of Economc Studes 37 (No. 3 970): 353-60.. On the Theory of the Compettve Frm under Prce Uncertanty. Amercan Economc Revew 6 (No. 97): 65-73. Shapro, C. Exchange of Cost Informaton n Olgopoly. Revew of Economc Studes 53 (No. 3 986): 433-46. Vves, X. Duopoly Informaton Equlbrum: Cournot and Bertrand. Journal of Economc Theory 34 (No. 984): 7-94.