Charpy V-Notch Impact Testing

Similar documents
Instrumented Impact Testing

Instrumented Pendulum Impact Testing for Plastics

ME 2570 MECHANICS OF MATERIALS

COMPRESSION TESTING BY MEANS OF CHARPY PENDULUM

FIS Specifications for Flex Poles (Edition May 2008) Original Text: German

PERFORMANCE TEST REPORT. Rendered to: VELUX AMERICA, INC. PRODUCT: SUN TUNNEL Domes TYPES: Acrylic and Polycarbonate

SPECIFIC HEAT OF WATER LAB 11-2

Project PAJ2 Dynamic Performance of Adhesively Bonded Joints. Report No. 3 August Proposed Draft for the Revision of ISO

FCP Short Course. Ductile and Brittle Fracture. Stephen D. Downing. Mechanical Science and Engineering

CALORIMETRY: Heat of Fusion of Ice

Figure 1.1. Relation between Celsius and Fahrenheit scales. From Figure 1.1. (1.1)

Exercises Evaporation (page 451) 23.2 Condensation (pages )

Chapter 7. Highlights:

IE 316 Exam 1 Fall 2011

ISO INTERNATIONAL STANDARD. Metallic materials Charpy pendulum impact test Part 1: Test method

C q T q C T. Heat is absorbed by the system H > 0 endothermic Heat is released by the system H < 0 exothermic

Experiment 2: THE DENSITY OF A SOLID UNKNOWN AND CALIBRATION WITH DATASTUDIO SOFTWARE

TEST METHOD FOR DETERMINING BREAKAWAY FORCE OF A MAGNET

Measurement of Bone Strength and Stiffness using 3-Point Bending

ICE MANTLE MAKER MODEL 452 User Maintenance Manual/Handbook

Instrumented Impact Tests: Effects of Machine Variables and Specimen Position

Experiment: Torsion Test Expected Duration: 1.25 Hours

Instrumented Impact Testing:

LAB 1 PRE-LAB. residuals (cm)

Heat Lost and Heat Gained Determining the Specific Heat of a Metal

Tensile stress strain curves for different materials. Shows in figure below

Influence of impact velocity on transition time for V-notched Charpy specimen*

Hess' Law: Calorimetry

Statics Principles. The laws of motion describe the interaction of forces acting on a body. Newton s First Law of Motion (law of inertia):

FME461 Engineering Design II

ICE MANTLE MAKER MODEL 452 User Maintenance Manual/Handbook

BioMechanics and BioMaterials Lab (BME 541) Experiment #5 Mechanical Prosperities of Biomaterials Tensile Test

HMS-5000 Manual. Product Name: HMS-5000 Hall Effect Measurement System with variable temperature from 80K to 350K. - Manual version: ver 5.

General Accreditation Guidance. Liquid-in-glass thermometers selection, use and calibration

Standard Practice for Heat Aging of Plastics Without Load 1

Structural Metals Lab 1.2. Torsion Testing of Structural Metals. Standards ASTM E143: Shear Modulus at Room Temperature

ME 243. Mechanics of Solids

S HEAR S TRENGTH IN P RINCIPAL P LANE OF W OOD

Determination of Transferable Lower-Bound Fracture Toughness from Small Specimens

Experiment 5. Heat and Temperature

Physics 4C Chapter 18: Temperature, Heat, and the First Law of Thermodynamics

Law vs. Theory. Steps in the Scientific Method. Outcomes Over the Long-Term. Measuring Matter in Two Ways

Laboratory 4 Bending Test of Materials

Lab Activity H4 It s Snow Big Deal

Coefficient of Friction Measurement On Polywater s Friction Table

1. Base your answer to the following question on the information below and on your knowledge of chemistry.

CHEM 334 Quantitative Analysis Laboratory

UNIT I SIMPLE STRESSES AND STRAINS

Station 1: Adiabatic Decompression Materials: Can of compressed air Infrared thermometer Graph paper

Examination in Damage Mechanics and Life Analysis (TMHL61) LiTH Part 1

High temperature He is hot

Standard Test Method for Determining the Charpy Impact Resistance of Notched Specimens of Plastics 1

ISO defines the Rockwell superficial hardness value, HRN, as:

Fracture mechanics fundamentals. Stress at a notch Stress at a crack Stress intensity factors Fracture mechanics based design

MODULE 1 Mechanical Measurements

2. State the direction of heat transfer between the surroundings and the water in the bottle from 7 a.m. to 3 p.m.

ME 207 Material Science I

Nitration of Methyl Benzoate

CHEMISTRY 135 General Chemistry II. Energy of Phase Changes [1]

Lab Investigation 4 - How could you make more of this dye?

Standard Test Methods for Glass-Bonded Mica Used as Electrical Insulation 1

Experiment 14 It s Snow Big Deal

Acetylsalicylic Acid (Aspirin) Synthesis

MOHAWK COLLEGE OF APPLIED ARTS AND TECHNOLOGY CHEMICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGY DEPARTMENT. Lab Report ROOM NO: FE E309

Lab #9- Calorimetry/Thermochemistry to the Rescue

Flushing Out the Moles in Lab: The Reaction of Calcium Chloride with Carbonate Salts

Heat of Fusion Determining the Heat of Fusion of Ice

PNEUMATIC ENTHALPY COMPARATOR

Put sufficient ice cubes into water (1 M) and wait for equilibrium (both exist) (1 M)

Disciplinary Core Ideas

What Do You Think? Investigate GOALS. Part A: Freezing Water

Thermal and electrical conductivity of metals

Chapter 3: Matter and Energy

TORSION TEST. Figure 1 Schematic view of torsion test

Thermochemistry/Calorimetry. Determination of the enthalpy of vaporization of liquids LEC 02. What you need: What you can learn about

Latent Heat of Fusion

CIE Chemistry A-Level Practicals for Papers 3 and 5

SPH3U UNIVERSITY PHYSICS

5. Repeated Loading. 330:148 (g) Machine Design. Dynamic Strength. Dynamic Loads. Dynamic Strength. Dynamic Strength. Nageswara Rao Posinasetti

Bell Ringer. What are the formulas to obtain the force, acceleration, and mass? And corresponding units. F= ma M= f/a A= f/m

Modern Chemistry Chapter 1 Matter and Changes. Sections 2 & 3 Matter and Its Properties Elements

Determination of an Equilibrium Constant Minneapolis Community and Technical College Principles of Chemistry II, C1152 v.1.16

CHEMISTRY 135 General Chemistry II. Determination of an Equilibrium Constant

Thermodynamics continued

Thermodynamics and States of Matter

Chapter 8: Internal Energy and the Laws of Thermodynamics

Dr.Salwa Alsaleh fac.ksu.edu.sa/salwams

Proceedings of the 28th Risø international symposium on materials science, 3-6 Sept 2007.

Experiment 14 - Heats of Reactions

Chapter 17 Temperature and heat

1. a Draw a labelled diagram of an atom that has 9 protons and electrons and 9 neutrons.

5. STRESS CONCENTRATIONS. and strains in shafts apply only to solid and hollow circular shafts while they are in the

Lab NUC. Determination of Half-Life with a Geiger-Müller Counter

Core practical 13: Determine a value for the specific latent heat of ice

IT-AP INFORMATION REGARDING THE CE MARK

UNIT 1 - FORCE TEMPERATURE IN THERMAL SYSTEMS ACTIVITY LESSON DESCRIPTION SCORE/POINTS

The Energy of Phase Changes

POE Practice Test - Materials

NORMAL STRESS. The simplest form of stress is normal stress/direct stress, which is the stress perpendicular to the surface on which it acts.

MECE 3321 MECHANICS OF SOLIDS CHAPTER 3

Transcription:

Charpy V-Notch Impact Testing ENGR45 Materials Science Laboratory Chad Philip Johnson Submitted: May 15 th 2013

Abstract The Charpy V-notch test is an engineering method that is frequently used to measure the toughness of a material, where the toughness represents the amount of energy a material can absorb until it fractures. The measurement and plotting of toughness values assists in understanding its brittle and ductile characteristics at varying temperatures. Although the Charpy V-notch test is not considered to be very precise compared to other toughness tests, it has been widely adopted because it is a simple procedure to perform and also inexpensive. The test involves a bar specimen of a material specially prepared so that a V-notch is machined into it. It is first secured and then struck in the location of this purposed defect by a special pendulum hammer that is released from a fixed height the resulting amount of energy absorbed by the material is then reported by the machine. In this experiment the CVM energies of two different steel samples were tested: A36 Steel and 1095 Steel. Material Upper Shelf Energy Absorbed Lower Shelf Energy Absorbed Upper Temperature Lower Temperature A36 Steel 200 ft-lb 4.3 ft-lb 60 C -20 C 1095 Steel 4.3 ft-lb 0.0 ft-lb N/A N/A Procedure Many different samples of A36 Steel and 1095 Steel were prepared to specific temperatures through the use of an oven for heating and an acetone bath mixed with dry ice for cooling. A thermal couple was used to monitor the temperatures in both cooling and heating chambers to ensure that the samples achieved the requisite temperature values for each measurement in the experiment. Heat levels in the oven were manipulated by adjusting control knobs on the device while the coldness levels were controlled through addition of dry ice to the acetone bath. The cooling temperatures were more difficult to manage because a specific amount of dry ice had to be added to the liquid to achieve and maintain a desired value; this usually required the addition of many small pieces along with close monitoring of the reported temperature. Many material samples were heated and cooled simultaneously in their respective chambers so that an individual sample could be retrieved at a desired temperature while the remaining

samples remained to equilibrate to more extreme temperatures for other Charpy V-notch measurements. The temperature control station used for preparing samples is shown in Picture 1 below. Picture 1. Temperature control station for Charpy V-notch samples. Operation of the Charpy V-notch machine was uncomplicated, although great care was taken in every part of the procedure to ensure that all safety precautions were followed. The pendulum hammer is necessarily massive and swings with a large amount of energy when it is breaking a sample. In order to obtain accurate experimental data, samples had to be inserted into the machine with five seconds of removal from the heating or cooling chamber. The hammer was then immediately released so that a minimal amount of thermal energy was exchanged with the surroundings. Failure to take a nearly immediate impact reading has a negative effect on the accuracy of the associated energy reading. The Charpy V-notch machine used in this experiment is shown in Picture 2 on the following page. The machine had not been serviced in many years so a calibration reading was performed by swinging the hammer without a loaded sample. The resulting value given by the machine was then subtracted from all subsequent measurements so that the true measured values could be determined. This data was then used to construct a ductile-to-brittle transition curve within a graph of impact energy

versus temperature for each sample using the software Charpy Regression Test v2 found at the website http://www.novanumeric.com/samples.php?calcname=charpy. Information about each material was then obtained from this statistical plotting of data. Results Difficulties existed in completing all of the measurements planned for the experiment. In the case of A36 Steel only four of the expected six measurements were taken. For the initial measurement for a sample at room temperature the hammer was reset to its raised position after the impact but before the value for the impact energy was recorded. This adjustment altered the reading and the measurement could not be repeated due to a lack of available A36 Steel samples. The four measured values two heated samples and two cooled samples are shown in Figure 1 located at the end of this report. Also, a brittle-toductile transition curve was produced for this material and is shown in Figure 2. Using this statistical curve the following values were found: ~20 C upper temperature, ~200 ft-lb upper shelf energy, ~-60 C lower temperature, and ~4.3 ft-lb lower shelf energy. As is evidenced in these figures, A36 Steel is capable of absorbing a much larger amount of energy at a higher temperature than at a lower temperature. The approximate Picture 2. Charpy V-notch machine. transition temperature is -20 C, which represents the point at which A36 Steel changes from being a brittle substance to a ductile substance. This is also the temperature at which it is expected that 50% of the fracture will be brittle. For the 1095 steel sample only two measurement could be taken due to time constraints: one at room temperature and another at ~78 C. The third measurement at an extreme cold temperature (approximately -78 C) could not be performed due to difficulties in cooling the sample to this

temperature. With only two data points a brittle-to-ductile transition curve could not be produced. A simple plotting of data communicates the likely upper and lower energy shelves 4.3 ft-lb and 0ft-lb, respectively but the upper and lower temperatures cannot be confirmed nor can the transition temperature. The value for the lower shelf is expected to be accurate because the steel sample is so brittle that it absorbs nearly zero energy from the hammer. However, it is possible that the value for the upper shelf is incorrect. Conclusion Time constraints on the experiment prevented ample readings to be obtained for the 1095 Steel sample so that a brittle-to-ductile transition curve could be produced. Also, an additional reading is required at higher temperatures to confirm that the value obtained for the upper shelf is accurate. For the A36 Steel sample, a reasonable representation of the material's brittle and ductile temperatures was created, although it is desired that more measurements be taken to increase the accuracy of the associated curve. Additional measurements are required to obtain a complete set of data for the 1095 Steel sample so that the toughness properties of each material can be compared and further investigations can be made into each.

A36 Steel Charpy V-notch Energy vs. Temperature 250 200 Energy (ft-lb) 150 100 50 0-80 -60-40 -20 0 20 40 60 80 100 Temperature ( C) Figure 1. A36 Steel Charpy V-notch measured values. Figure 2. Brittle-to-ductile transition curve for A36 Steel.

1095 Steel Charpy V-notch Energy vs. Temperature 5 4 Energy (ft-lb) 3 2 1 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 Temperature ( C) Figure 3. 1095 Steel Charpy V-notch measured values.