ALTRUISM AND REPUTATION cooperation within groups

Similar documents
ALTRUISM OR JUST SHOWING OFF?

Altruism, reputation, and collective collapse of cooperation in a simple model

Altruism or Just Showing Off?

Reciprocity and Trust under an Evolutionary Context

Other-Regarding Preferences: Theory and Evidence

Strategic Games: Social Optima and Nash Equilibria

Understanding and Solving Societal Problems with Modeling and Simulation

ABSTRACT: Dissolving the evolutionary puzzle of human cooperation.

Emerging communities in networks a flow of ties

Alana Schick , ISCI 330 Apr. 12, The Evolution of Cooperation: Putting gtheory to the Test

Introduction to game theory LECTURE 1

Divided We Stand: The Evolution of Altruism. Darwin 101. The Paradox of Altruism. Altruism: Costly behavior that helps others

VII. Cooperation & Competition

EVOLUTIONARY GAMES WITH GROUP SELECTION

CRITICAL BEHAVIOR IN AN EVOLUTIONARY ULTIMATUM GAME WITH SOCIAL STRUCTURE

Evolutionary Game Theory

Darwinian Evolution of Cooperation via Punishment in the Public Goods Game

Evolution of Cooperation in Evolutionary Games for Heterogeneous Interactions

Cooperation in Social Dilemmas through Position Uncertainty

Belief-based Learning

Cooperation Stimulation in Cooperative Communications: An Indirect Reciprocity Game

Institut für Höhere Studien (IHS), Wien Institute for Advanced Studies, Vienna

Communities and Populations

Lecture Notes: Self-enforcing agreements

6.207/14.15: Networks Lecture 16: Cooperation and Trust in Networks

Suggested solutions to the 6 th seminar, ECON4260

9.916 Ingroups and Outgroups

N-Player Prisoner s Dilemma

Iterated Strict Dominance in Pure Strategies

Bounded Rationality Lecture 2. Full (Substantive, Economic) Rationality

Game Theory, Population Dynamics, Social Aggregation. Daniele Vilone (CSDC - Firenze) Namur

Ex Post Nash Equilibrium in Linear Bayesian Games for Decision Making in Multi-Environments

Psychology 4590 Evolutionary Psychology Spring, 2004

Dynamic-persistence of cooperation in public good games when group size is dynamic

Phase transitions in social networks

Evolution of cooperation. Martin Nowak, Harvard University

People talk about Fairness and Trust Stigler (1981) self-interest theory will win. Results = price tag on negative reciprocity

Costly Signals and Cooperation

Evolutionary prisoner s dilemma games coevolving on adaptive networks

Cooperation Achieved by Migration and Evolution in a Multilevel Selection Context

Evolution of Cooperation in Continuous Prisoner s Dilemma Games on Barabasi Albert Networks with Degree-Dependent Guilt Mechanism

Quantum Games. Quantum Strategies in Classical Games. Presented by Yaniv Carmeli

BELIEFS & EVOLUTIONARY GAME THEORY

TI-games I: An Exploration of Type Indeterminacy in Strategic Decision-making

Policing and group cohesion when resources vary

Cooperation. Main points for today. How can altruism evolve? Group living vs. cooperation. Sociality-nocooperation. and cooperationno-sociality

Brief history of The Prisoner s Dilemma (From Harman s The Price of Altruism)

Guilt in Games. P. Battigalli and M. Dufwenberg (AER, 2007) Presented by Luca Ferocino. March 21 st,2014

Computation of Efficient Nash Equilibria for experimental economic games

Internalization. a Game-Theoretic Approach. Rolf Ziegler Institute of Sociology University of Munich

The coevolution of recognition and social behavior

M any societal problems, such as pollution, global warming, overfishing, or tax evasion, result from social

A Dynamic Level-k Model in Games

First Prev Next Last Go Back Full Screen Close Quit. Game Theory. Giorgio Fagiolo

MATCHING STRUCTURE AND THE EVOLUTION OF COOPERATION IN THE PRISONER S DILEMMA

SONDERFORSCHUNGSBEREICH 504

Social Motives in Intergroup Conflict: Group Identity and Perceived Target of Threat

CS 798: Multiagent Systems

C31: Game Theory, Lecture 1

Living in groups 1. What are three costs and three benefits of living in groups?

Evolutionary Games on Networks. Wen-Xu Wang and G Ron Chen Center for Chaos and Complex Networks

Computing Minmax; Dominance

Biological institutions: an institutional perspective on biological cooperation

Stability in negotiation games and the emergence of cooperation

Game interactions and dynamics on networked populations

Evolution & Learning in Games

Observations on Cooperation

5. Externalities and Public Goods. Externalities. Public Goods types. Public Goods

The Evolution of Cooperation Through Imitation 1

5. Externalities and Public Goods

3650 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON COMMUNICATIONS, VOL. 60, NO. 12, DECEMBER 2012

Routing Games : From Altruism to Egoism

Game Theory and Evolution

Computation of Nash Equilibria of Two-Person Non-Cooperative Games with Maple

Enforcing Truthful-Rating Equilibria in Electronic Marketplaces

The Paradox of Cooperation Benets

Effi ciency in Repeated Games with Local Monitoring

arxiv: v1 [cs.gt] 17 Aug 2016

Lecture 1. Evolution of Market Concentration

Kalle Parvinen. Department of Mathematics FIN University of Turku, Finland

ANNIVERSARY ESSAY. Indirect selection and individual selection in sociobiology: my personal views on theories of social behaviour AMOTZ ZAHAVI

Research Article The Dynamics of the Discrete Ultimatum Game and the Role of the Expectation Level

arxiv: v2 [physics.soc-ph] 29 Aug 2017

Spatial three-player prisoners dilemma

Complexity in social dynamics : from the. micro to the macro. Lecture 4. Franco Bagnoli. Lecture 4. Namur 7-18/4/2008

Application of Evolutionary Game theory to Social Networks: A Survey

Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation

Damon Centola.

Competitive Altruism: Development of Reputation-based Cooperation in Groups. Mark Van Vugt, University of Kent

Graph topology and the evolution of cooperation

arxiv: v2 [q-bio.pe] 18 Dec 2007

Coalition Factor in the Evolution of Non-Kin Altruism

Introduction to Game Theory. Outline. Topics. Recall how we model rationality. Notes. Notes. Notes. Notes. Tyler Moore.

Reputation-based mutual selection rule promotes cooperation in spatial threshold public goods games

Capital, Institutions and Urban Growth Systems

FAIRNESS IS A VIRTUE IN COOPERATION

Play Locally, Learn Globally: The Structural Basis of Cooperation

SF2972 Game Theory Exam with Solutions March 15, 2013

Partners in power: Job mobility and dynamic deal-making

Transcription:

ALTRUISM AND REPUTATION cooperation within groups Krzysztof Kułakowski Małgorzata Krawczyk Przemysław Gawroński Kraków, Poland 21-25 September, University of Warwick, UK

Complex are: text, mind, community, society... The Prisonner s Dilemma: most hard formulation of the problem of cooperation. Payoff: a necessary ingredient of game theory. Our aim: a minimal model of cooperation, payoffs unspecified. Motivation: to include norms, not only strategies. Strategies: complete, specified, depend on payoff and information Norms: uncomplete, general, less dependent on payoff and info [Gary Goertz, in International norms and decision making: a punctuated equilibrium model, Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Portland 2003]

Homo Economicus - a creature who is rational and purely self-regarding Homo Sociologicus - a creature who follows prevailing social norms without regards to selfinterest E. Fehr, H. Gintis, Human motivation and social cooperation, Ann. Rev. Soc. 2007

outline 1. Intro: competitive altruism 2. Minimal model of cooperation 3. Numerical results 4. In-group preference

Why to cooperate? kinship, reciprocity, indirect reciprocity, punishment The Prisoner s Dilemma: cooperate defect cooperate R,R T,S defect S,T U,U Rational choice both defect Individuals ( ) feel a need of social approval to such a degree that there is a little conflict between self-interest and social values. [Talcott Parsons] Change means movement. Movement means friction. Only in the frictionless vacuum of a nonexistent abstract world can movement or change occur without that abrasive friction of conflict. [Saul Alinsky]

a babbler who finds food may not swallow it right away but instead it may hold it in its beak and look around to see whom it can feed. [Amotz and Avishag Zahavi, The handicap principle: a missing piece of Darwin's puzzle, Oxford UP, 1997] I interpret the altruistic behaviour of the babblers ( ) as selfish investments in advertising the claim of the altruist for its social prestige. What will happen to me if I stop to help him?

The handicap principle : RELIABLE SIGNALS MUST BE COSTLY TO THE SIGNALER

individuals compete to be and to be seen as altruistic [G. Roberts, Competitive altruism: from reciprocity to the handicap principle, Proc. R. Soc. London B 1998] honest broker Land Rover Defender

A minimal model of cooperation 1. Individuals i = 1,,N are characterized by two parameters: - altruism ε(i) = const, -1/2 < ε(i) < 1/2 - time-dependent reputation W(i), 0 < W(i) < 1 2. The probability P(i,j) that i cooperates with j is calculated as 3. When i cooperates, her/his reputation r(i) increases W(i) (W(i)+1)/2 3. When i defects, her/his reputation r(i) decreases W(i) W(i)/2 1 P(i,j) 0 1 ε(i)+w(j) [K. K., P. Gawronski, To cooperate or to defect? Altruism and reputation, Physica A 2009]

Interpretation of the minimal model : competitive altruism Competitive altruism theory is based on two simple premises. First it assumes that there are individual differences in altruism (...). Second, in forming alliances there is competition for the most moral and cooperative partners. As a consequence, people compete to behave more altruistically than others and establish an altruistic reputation. Competitive altruism is just one of several pathways to the development of cooperation in human groups. [M. Van Vugt, G. Roberts, C. Hardy, Competitive altruism: development of reputationbased cooperation in groups, in Oxford Handbook of Evolutionary Psychology, R. Dunbar and L. Barrett (Eds.), Oxford UP, 2007

Probability of successful cooperation (R) against altruism. P(X) U R T S ε

The outcome is weakly correlated with temporary reputation. P(X) W

P(X) Probability of successful cooperation (R) against mean reputation. U R T S <W>

Correlation between altruism and reputation

P(X) a short time or a sparse network U R T S ε

COOPERATION WITHIN GROUPS Prisoner s Dilemma experiment with platoons of males formed for 4-week period of officer training in the Swiss army 1. The intra-group cooperation was found to be clearly stronger than the inter-group one. 2. Individuals believed that members of their own platoons were more willing to cooperate. L.Goette, D.Huffman, S.Meier, The impact of group membership on cooperation and norm enforcement, (March 2006), FRB of Boston Working Paper No 06-7.

Implementation of the bias: In-group preference: N N/2 + N/2 ε(i)+w(j) ε(i)+w(j) + κ if i,j belong to the same group ε(i)+w(j) ε(i)+w(j) - κ if i,j belong to different groups The outcome is the frequency-of-cooperation-matrix F(i,j) and we search for the communities in this matrix, i.e. for clusters which are connected more tightly.

Identification of communities: 1. To define the time-dependent weighted connectivity matrix C ij 2. To set the initial value of C ij = F(i,j) 3. The time evolution of C ij is governed by the equation of motion dc dt ij = Θ( C ) Θ(1 C ) ( C C β ) ij 4. Along with C, we calculate the time dependence of the modularity Q Q 1 kik j = [ Cij ] δ ( gi, g j ) where k = m m ij and δ (, ) = 1 g i g j ij k ik kj i C ij j m = iff i,j belong to the same cluster. 5. We adopt the structure of communities when Q is maximal. ij C ij [M.E.J.Newman, Analysis of weighted networks, PRE 2004; M.J.Krawczyk, Differential equations as a tool for community identification, PRE 2008]

Simulation: N = 300, κ = 0.3, # of games = 15 x 10 5 Results: two clusters of N/4 nodes each, with < ε > 0.25

conclusions 1. Our minimal model of cooperation driven by altruism and reputation has a sociological counterpart in the theory of competitive altruism. 2. Simulations show that the model is able to reproduce the phenomenon of cooperation. 3. The model can be generalized to describe the process of group formation, as observed by Goette et al. 4. In a more realistic version, the model should allow to refrain from playing with agents with bad reputation. [S. Ohtsuki, Y. Iwasa, How should we define goodness? J. Theor. Biol. 2004]

The following webpages are acknowledged: www.tau.ac.il/lifesci/departments/zoology/members/zahavi/zahavi.html www.calvarywilliamsport.com/goods3.htm images.absoluteastronomy.com/images/topicimages/a/au/auguste_comte.gif www.d.umn.edu/cla/faculty/jhamlin/2111/2111schd_files/smith.gif k53.pbase.com/g4/76/416576/2/63511104.ne2hs0d2.jpg www.treehugger.com/galleries/images/arnold-schwarzenegger-hummer.jpg farm1.static.flickr.com/140/318477779_5e171eaf27_b.jpg www.mentortestprep.com/images/diploma4.jpg www.zgapa.pl/zgapedia/data_pictures/_uploads_wiki/f/frankfurt_deutsche_bank_skyscryper.jpg www.mexico-with-heart.com/mex-images/priest-and-people.jpg cache.jalopnik.com/assets/resources/2008/02/2007-land-rover-defender-90.jpg en.wikipedia.org/wiki/file:bundesarchiv_bild_183-r29818,_otto_von_bismarck.jpg www.greendevils.pl/armie_swiata/swiss-army-22.jpg THANK YOU