NEWFIRM Quick Guide for Proposal Preparation

Similar documents
NICMOS Status and Plans

EXPOSURE TIME ESTIMATION

FLAT FIELDS FROM THE MOONLIT EARTH

Commissioning of the Hanle Autoguider

Transiting Exoplanet in the Near Infra-red for the XO-3 System

Auto-guiding System for CQUEAN

Southern African Large Telescope. Prime Focus Imaging Spectrograph. Instrument Acceptance Testing Plan

The shapes of faint galaxies: A window unto mass in the universe

Cross-Talk in the ACS WFC Detectors. I: Description of the Effect

You, too, can make useful and beautiful astronomical images at Mees: Lesson 3

SMTN-002: Calculating LSST limiting magnitudes and SNR

AS750 Observational Astronomy

OPTICAL PHOTOMETRY. Observational Astronomy (2011) 1

Point Spread Functions. Aperture Photometry. Obs Tech Obs Tech 26 Sep 2017

LCO Global Telescope Network: Operations and policies for a time-domain facility. Todd Boroson

Data Processing in DES

VRI Photometry of M67 for CCD Standardization at 2.3m VBT

NAOYUKI TAMURA Subaru Instrument Astronomer Subaru Telescope, NAOJ

Keck Adaptive Optics Note 1069

PHYSICS Observing Guide

Capturing and Processing Deep Space Images. Petros Pissias Eumetsat Astronomy Club 15/03/2018

Mitigation of H2RG persistence with image illumination Brian A. McLeod* a, Roger Smith b

1 A photometric probe for Pan-STARRS

Introduction to SDSS -instruments, survey strategy, etc

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph.im] 24 Mar 2009

Calibration of ACS Prism Slitless Spectroscopy Modes

Laboratory Emulation of Observations from Space

Early-Science call for observing time with SAM-FP

Astronomical Techniques I

High contrast imaging at 3-5 microns. Philip M. Hinz University of Arizona Matt Kenworthy, Ari Heinze, John Codona, Roger Angel

Ay Fall 2012 Imaging and Photometry Part I

1 The Preliminary Processing

The Dark Energy Survey Public Data Release 1

Gemini Integration Time Calculators

Note on OSIRIS Wavelength Calibrations D. Le Mignant, Oct. 5, 2007

Narrowband Imaging, or How to Image in Downtown Portland. Duncan Kitchin OMSI Astro Imaging Conference 2010

Scattered Light from the Earth Limb Measured with the STIS CCD

Lab 4 Radial Velocity Determination of Membership in Open Clusters

Persistence in the WFC3 IR Detector: Spatial Variations

Processing Wide Field Imaging data Mike Irwin

BigBOSS Data Reduction Software

FPA#64 and new substrate removed FPAs for WFC3-IR: a trade-off study

The Kunlun Infrared Sky Survey (KISS) with AST3-NIR Camera. Jessica Zheng

Influence of moon light on tip-tilt sensing accuracy using STRAP

Notes: Reference: Merline, W. J. and S. B. Howell (1995). "A Realistic Model for Point-sources Imaged on Array Detectors: The Model and Initial

MID INFRARED ASTRONOMY TECHNIQUES, AND DATA

Earth Flats. 1. Introduction. Instrument Science Report ACS R. C. Bohlin, J. Mack, G. Hartig, & M. Sirianni October 25, 2005

Chapter 6: Transforming your data

The IRS Flats. Spitzer Science Center

Here Be Dragons: Characterization of ACS/WFC Scattered Light Anomalies

Goals of the meeting. Catch up with JWST news and developments: ERS and GO call for proposals are coming!!

Expected Performance From WIYN Tip-Tilt Imaging

E-ELT Spectroscopic ETC: Detailed Description

Observing with the Infrared Spectrograph

arxiv:astro-ph/ v2 6 Dec 2006

Chapter 5: Telescopes

Photometric Calibration of the CCD Camera of 1-m Telescope at VBO

The Impact of x-cte in the WFC3/UVIS detector on Astrometry

Large Area Imaging Survey of Near-Infrared Sky with Korean Compact Space Telescopes

September 2008 LGS Science Observing Plan 9/18/08 v1.1, A. Bouchez

UVIT IN ORBIT CALIBRATIONS AND CALIBRATION TOOLS. Annapurni Subramaniam IIA (On behalf of the UVIT team)

Astro 500 A500/L-15 1

CHAPTER 10 Techniques for Background Measurement and Mosaicing

Variable Stars Advanced Lab

The Transneptunian Automated Occultation Survey (TAOS II) Matthew Lehner ASIAA

Lab 4: Stellar Spectroscopy

SKINAKAS OBSERVATORY. Astronomy Projects for University Students PROJECT SUPERNOVA REMNANTS

POLICAN: A near infrared imaging Polarimeter

Analysis of wavelength shifts reported for X-shooter spectra

First On-orbit Measurements of the WFC3-IR Count-rate Non-Linearity

DOME C AS A SETTING FOR THE PERMANENT ALL SKY SURVEY (PASS)

NEON Archive School 2006

Hanle Echelle Spectrograph (HESP)

Studies of diffuse UV radiation

The in-orbit wavelength calibration of the WFC G800L grism

Introduction of near-infrared (NIR) spectroscopy. Ken-ichi Tadaki (NAOJ)

FORCAST: Science Capabili2es and Data Products. William D. Vacca

1. Give short answers to the following questions. a. What limits the size of a corrected field of view in AO?

INTRODUCTION TO THE TELESCOPE

Millimagnitude Accuracy Photometry of Extra solar Planets Transits using Small Telescopes

C. Watson, E. Churchwell, R. Indebetouw, M. Meade, B. Babler, B. Whitney

Determining the Orbital Period of the Cataclysmic Variable CSS1204 Using Data from the Vatican Advanced Technology Telescope

High Signal-to-Noise, Differential NICMOS Spectrophotometry

FMOS. A Wide-field Multi-Object Infra-red Spectrograph for the Subaru Telescope. David Bonfield, Gavin Dalton

Problem Solving. radians. 180 radians Stars & Elementary Astrophysics: Introduction Press F1 for Help 41. f s. picture. equation.

Mid-Infrared Astronomy with IRAIT at Dome C: performances and simulations

Data Reduction - Optical / NIR Imaging. Chian-Chou Chen Ph319

Measurements of the DL0SHF 8 GHz Antenna

A Random Walk Through Astrometry

Astronomy IRAF Tutorial for Exercise II Quick-look Photometry with Imexamine

Water Ice on the Satellite of Kuiper Belt Object 2003 EL61

Monitoring The HRC-S UV Rate: Observations of Vega

The CTA SST-1M cherenkov telescope. for high-energy gamma-ray astronomy. and its SiPM-based camera. Victor Coco (DPNC, Universite de Geneve)

Fundamental limits to the precision in astrometry and photometry using array detectors through the Cramér-Rao minimum variance bound

HETDEX Overview. Hobby Eberly Telescope Dark Energy Experiment. HETDEX is: HETDEX enables a lot of ancillary science. HETDEX Science Workshop Feb 09

Exoplanets Direct imaging. Direct method of exoplanet detection. Direct imaging: observational challenges

Imaging with Micado at the E-ELT. WORKSHOP: Imaging at the E-ELT

SCIENCE PERSPECTIVE OF THE MID-INFRARED IMAGER PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS

Spitzer Space Telescope

Reduction procedure of long-slit optical spectra. Astrophysical observatory of Asiago

Transcription:

NEWFIRM Quick Guide for Proposal Preparation Ron Probst NEWFIRM Instrument Scientist September 2008 NEWFIRM is a 1-2.4 micron IR camera for the NOAO 4-m telescopes. It has a flexible complement of broad and narrow band filters, a dedicated guider, and the largest field of view available at the f/8 R-C focus without vignetting by the telescope structure. Software packages for observation scripting and execution, quick look data reduction in near real time, and full pipeline image processing to a science ready state are being provided. This document provides information necessary to write a technically sound proposal for execution of a scientific program with NEWFIRM. Availability and scheduling NEWFIRM will be shared between the Mayall (northern) and Blanco (southern) 4-m telescopes. Both standard and survey programs may be proposed. NEWFIRM will be available for observations on the Mayall telescope during semester 2008A through the end of 2009B. A policy statement explaining how science programs will be scheduled under these constraints can be found at NEWFIRM Scheduling Policy through 2011. Geometry The detector focal plane consists of four 2048 x 2048 arrays arranged in a 2 x 2 mosaic. Figure 1 shows the mapping of individual arrays, identified by their serial numbers SNxxx, onto the sky. The orientation is fixed; the instrument cannot be rotated. Field of view: 27.6 x 27.6 arcmin including a 35 arcsec wide, cross-shaped gap between the arrays composing the mosaic. Sampling: 0.40 arcsec/pixel Dithering: independent of S/N considerations, a dither pattern of at least 3 points in an L shape spannng at least 70 arcsec separation on each axis is recommended to bridge cosmetic defects and the mosaic gap, and eliminate spurious pointlike sources due to ghosting on bright stars. See also cosmetics and ghosting in the section on Illumination issues below. Programs needing greater sensitivity might wish to fill in this area with a denser dither pattern.

SN022 SN011 North SN019 SN013 East Figure 1. Mapping between arrays and sky. Filter complement There are more NEWFIRM-specific filters than can be accomodated in the Dewar at one time. Some have been provided with non-noao funds and have restrictions placed on their use. For a policy statement on filter availability and filter changes, see NEWFIRM Filter Availability and Policy on Filter Changes. A set of broadband and narrowband filters has been tested on-sky in NEWFIRM and is presently installed in the intrument. Performance data are tabulated below. Broadband: J, H, Ks Narrowband: 1.64 micron [Fe II], 2.12 micron H 2, 2.17 micron Br γ Broadband filters follow the MKO prescription of Tokunaga et al., PASP 114, 180, 2002. A J, H, Ks filter set will remain permanently installed in the Dewar. The narrowband filters are designed to capture the designated emission line feature with high transmission over the entire field of view at zero redshift. Resolution is about 1.3%. The filter bandpass shifts in wavelength with radial position in the field of view. At field center, the designated line falls near the blue edge of the high transmission window; at field corner, near the red edge. The 1.64 micron [Fe II] filter may also be used in conjunction with broadband H for on/off methane band detection of brown dwarfs. The bandpass will shift across the methane absorption edge from field center to field corner as noted above.

Signal levels on star and sky for broadband and narrowband filters Important signal level performance issues for proposal planning: (1) Array SN019 has reduced response in the J and H bands compared to the other arrays, due to a different antireflection coating on this array (see Tables 1 and 2) (2) The J sky background varies substantially with angular distance between the field of view and the Moon (see Fig. 2) (3) The Ks sky background varies substantially with sky temperature, e.g. between summer and winter (see Tables 1 and 2) J and H band performance are tabulated separately for array SN019, and for the other three arrays which are very similar in performance. Table 1. Star and sky levels for broadband filters Filter J H Counts on 10.0 mag 6.9E5 (SN019) 9.6E5 (SN019) star, e-/sec (1) 9.0E5 (others) 10.9E5 (others) Ks Summer ( 22 C ) Ks Winter ( 12 C ) 4.7E5 No change Sky background, e-/sec-pixel (2) 435 (SN019) 2900 (SN019) 565 (others) 3300 (others) 3800 2300 Zero Point: mag 22.3 (SN019) 22.7 (SN019) corresponding to 21.9 No change 1 ADU/sec 22.6 (others) 22.8 (others) Brightest star 10.7 10.9 10.1 No change observable, mag (3) Faintest star, 3σ in 20.3 (SN019) 60 sec, mag (4) 20.5 (others) 19.7 18.7 19.0 Notes: (1) Vega = 0.00 mag; scaled from fainter standards and 2MASS stars (2) J levels are for 50-60 degrees away from full Moon; see also Figure 2 (3) Assumes 1.7 sec integration time and well depth corresponding to 25% nonlinearity correction at peak pixel level (see Fig. 3). (4) Integrated over 40 pixel (3 arcsec) aperture, sky brightnesses as tabulated, and no S/N degradation from sky subtraction. Vega magnitudes.

Table 2. Star and sky levels for narrowband filters Filter name 1644 nm [Fe II] 2124 nm H 2 2168 nm Br γ λ eff, microns 1.644 2.124 2.168 Bandpass, microns (1) 0.015 0.020 0.020 Sky background 145 (SN019) 190 (summer) 255 (summer) e-/sec-pixel 165 (others) 115 (winter) 130 (winter) Counts on 10.0 mag F6 star, e-/sec (2) 4.9E4 (SN019) 5.6E4 (others) 3.7E4 3.2E4 Flux density of 10.0 mag star, mjy (3) Flux density of 10.0 mag star, W m -2 μ -1 (3) 104 68 66 1.2E-13 4.5E-14 4.2E-14 Notes: (1) Bandpass at 90% of maximum transmission. FWHM typically 1.2X wider. (2) Vega = 0.00 mag (3) Derived from Tokunaga and Vacca (PASP 117, 421, 2005) flux densities for MKO broadband filters, with scaling to effective wavelengths for 6400 K star. Vega magnitude. Figure 2 shows the increase in J band sky background, under full Moon, as the angular distance between the telescope pointing and the Moon decreases. The Y axis gives the multiplier for the J band background levels quoted in Table 1. It is very difficult to shield the telescope truss structure from moonlight. At angular distances less than about 20 degrees, the primary mirror is directly illuminated. Lunar phase and distance from target fields should be considered when specifying the range of acceptable scheduling dates for a proposal.

3.0 Moonlight on telescope truss 2.0 1.0 Moonlight on primary 60 50 40 30 20 10 Angular distance from full Moon, degrees Figure 2. Relative increase in J sky background with proximity to full Moon Non-NOAO filters The non-noao filters listed in Table 3 have been purchased by individual researchers for potential use with NEWFIRM in upcoming semesters. Whether or not programs using these filters will be scheduled depends on the recommendations of the TAC, the feasibility of scheduling them for use, and any restrictions placed on use by their owners. Please see NEWFIRM Filter Availability and Policy on Filter Changes for further information before proposing to use any filters in this list. Signal levels on star and sky generally scale relative to the broadband J and H filters in proportion to bandpass. The ultra-narrowband 1056 nm and 1063 nm filters are located in OH line-free regions so the sky background is nill. Detection sensitivity with these filters will likely depend on systematic effects with the sky background and readout electronics, rather than on photon statistics or read noise.

Table 3. Non-NOAO Filters Name Central Wavelength, microns Band pass, microns 1187 nm 1.186 0.011 2096 nm 2.096 0.020 J1 1.048 0.161 J2 1.190 0.153 J3 1.284 0.152 H1 1.556 0.175 H2 1.710 0.168 1056 nm 1.0564 0.0007 1063 nm 1.0631 0.0008 Detector performance and cosmetics NEWFIRM uses four, 2048 x 2048 ORION InSb arrays produced by Raytheon Vision Systems. Arrays are characterized in NOAO s Infrared Detector Test Lab as well as at the telescope. Well capacity: ~100,000 electrons at 400 mv bias System read noise: 35 electrons rms, 1 Fowler sample Dark current: 0.3 electrons per pixel per second System gain: ~8 electrons per ADU Nonlinearity: Few percent at ~40% of full well. Differs between arrays. See Table 4. Responsivity: differs between arrays due to different antireflection coatings. See Tables 1 and 2 for count rates at the telescope.

Table 4. Departure from linear response Onset, ADU Nonlinearity SN011 SN013 SN019 1% 6700 4600 4500 3% 7000 6000 5200 5% 7700 6500 5800 10% 8700 7700 6800 15% 9500 8400 7500 20% 10300 9000 8000 25% 10800 9600 8400 Cosmetics: these arrays exhibit scattered localized or small-area responsivity defects. These include Photo Emissive Defects (PEDs) that have been passivated and have no response; some inoperable rows/columns, usually associated with a PED; fixed cracks; and small debonded regions with no response along edges or at corners.figure 1, obtained during laboratory tests, illustrates these phenomena on array SN013. Fig. 1 PEDs, inoperable rows, diagonal cracks, and debonded corner on SN013.

Illumination issues System responses to illumination by the sky and by pointlike or extended sources need to be taken into account in the observing protocols and time estimates. It does not appear that unusual protocols or reduction procedures, compared to other infrared cameras, will be necessary to remove these aspects of the instrument signature to a satisfactory level. Focus and image quality: At optimum focus for each bandpass, zenith FWHM in 10 sec exposures is 2.3 pixels (0.9 arcsec) in very good seeing. There are calibrated focus offsets between J, H, and Ks bands. Flatfield response: This is a combination of intrinsic detector performance and the illumination pattern produced by NEWFIRM s optics. We see ±5-10% response variations from the mean with low spatial frequency in the J, H, Ks sky and dome flats. Pupil ghost: a background enhancement of up to 1.15 above the mean sky level has been reported for the J filter in the central few arcmin (radially) of the field. This appears to be an additive phenomenon. We are investigating means to define flatfields with this effect modeled and removed. Narrowband flatfields and fringing: narrowband filters show distinct radial response patterns of about one cycle from field center to corner, possibly produced by the bandpass shifting across regions with more or stronger night sky lines in wavelength space. These low frequency patterns sky subtract well. Some high spatial frequency bulls eye fringing can be seen in raw images. These might prove troublesome if the night sky emission is varying rapidly, but in my experiments the fringes sky subtract out. More experience is needed here. Ghosts on bright stars: bright stars can produce three different pupil ghosts. Their characteristics in the J filter are as follows: 1. A ~300 pixel diameter ghost, 17 mag/sq arcsec fainter than the integrated magnitude of the source star. Offset from the source radially with respect to field center by hundreds of pixels; offset depends on source distance from field center. 2. A ~100 pixel diameter ghost, 14 mag/sq arcsec fainter than the integrated magnitude of the source star, and nearly centered on it. 3. A compact starlike ghost (~4 pixels FWHM), 8.5 magnitudes (integrated) fainter than the source star, offset radially from it by hundreds of pixels in a fieldposition-dependent manner.

Given the ~10 mag dynamic range of the arrays, ghost #1 may be detectable only for the brightest stars (3-5 mag). Its size makes it difficult to remove by dithering. However, both its location and its surface brightness are predictable. Ghost #2 may produce compact, low level nebulosity around somewhat fainter stars, 7-8 mag. Ghost #3 has the potential for producing false field stars. Fortunately, a modest dither pattern of tens of arcseconds shifts the ghost by more than its FWHM, so it will likely not print through in a median-combined image. The pipeline reduction team is investigating how best to handle ghost suppression in the data reduction. Residual images (sometimes called retained charge ): very bright stars may produce faint residual images at the same locations in subsequent dithered frames. These residual images fade into the background sky noise over the course of subsequent array reads. From experiments with bright stars, these residuals appear to be ~12 mag (integrated) fainter than the source star. Structure is smooth and flat within the outer contour of the originating star s PSF. Flux is ~10 electrons per second per pixel in the first subsequent frame, decaying to a few e-/sec-pix in following frames. We are investigating means to remove or ameliorate these effects when shifting and combining images in the pipeline reduction software. System operational and efficiency issues Minimum integration time = readout time: 1.7 seconds with one Fowler sample. Coadding is supported. This reduces the data volume with the short integration times necessary for broadband H and Ks observations. Fowler sampling (multiple nondestructive reads) is supported. The minimum integration time becomes 1.7 seconds X number of samples. This technique reduces read noise if it is a significant noise source, e.g. with narrowband filters. NEWFIRM is conceived as a system for carrying out survey-type programs with high efficiency. Observations are driven by scripts created in advance using an observing tool. In this automated mode we have achieved up to 80% efficiency when executing a script with short unguided integrations. Multiplying calculated on-sky integration time by 1.3 should give a good estimate of the total clock time required to execute a program of some hours duration, including modest amounts of time for target acquisition and setup, and assuming good weather.