Superconducting RF Accelerators: Why all the interest?

Similar documents
Short Introduction to CLIC and CTF3, Technologies for Future Linear Colliders

CERN Accelerator School. RF Cavities. Erk Jensen CERN BE-RF

Impedance & Instabilities

WG2 on ERL light sources CHESS & LEPP

Introduction to Collider Physics

ANALYSIS OF HIGH ORDER MODES IN 1.3 GHZ CW SRF ELECTRON LINAC FOR A LIGHT SOURCE

Tools of Particle Physics I Accelerators

Linac JUAS lecture summary

Lecture 5: Photoinjector Technology. J. Rosenzweig UCLA Dept. of Physics & Astronomy USPAS, 7/1/04

The 2015 erhic Ring-Ring Design. Christoph Montag Collider-Accelerator Department Brookhaven National Laboratory

Longitudinal Dynamics

ILC Particle Sources -Electron and PositronMasao KURIKI (Hiroshima University)

Status of linear collider designs:

3. Synchrotrons. Synchrotron Basics

Physics 736. Experimental Methods in Nuclear-, Particle-, and Astrophysics. - Accelerator Techniques: Introduction and History -

Energy Recovery Linac (ERL) Science Workshop

SAST Lecture - III. Linear Accelerators. P N Prakash. IUAC, New Delhi

Fundamental Concepts of Particle Accelerators V : Future of the High Energy Accelerators. Koji TAKATA KEK. Accelerator Course, Sokendai

A Project to convert TLS Booster to hadron accelerator 1. Basic design. 2. The injection systems:

Lecture 1 Introduction to RF for Accelerators. Dr G Burt Lancaster University Engineering

EP228 Particle Physics

Fundamental Concepts of Particle Accelerators III : High-Energy Beam Dynamics (2) Koji TAKATA KEK. Accelerator Course, Sokendai. Second Term, JFY2012

From the Wideröe gap to the linac cell

Introduction to accelerators for teachers (Korean program) Mariusz Sapiński CERN, Beams Department August 9 th, 2012

1.5-GeV FFAG Accelerator as Injector to the BNL-AGS

Geometrical and RF Considerations for All Beam Collisions via Crab- Crossing

Review of proposals of ERL injector cryomodules. S. Belomestnykh

S.Y. Lee Bloomington, Indiana, U.S.A. June 10, 2011

Fundamental Concepts of Particle Accelerators V: Future of the High Energy Accelerators VI: References. Koji TAKATA KEK. Accelerator Course, Sokendai

The TESLA Dogbone Damping Ring

Contents. LC : Linear Collider. µ-µ Collider. Laser-Plasma Wave Accelerator. Livingston Chart 6 References

Particles and Universe: Particle accelerators

Spoke and other TEM-class superconducting cavities. J.L. Muñoz, ESS-Bilbao Academy-Industry Matching Event CIEMAT, Madrid, 27.May.

Physics 610. Adv Particle Physics. April 7, 2014

Accelerator Physics. Tip World Scientific NEW JERSEY LONDON SINGAPORE BEIJING SHANGHAI HONG KONG TAIPEI BANGALORE. Second Edition. S. Y.

The Large Hadron electron Collider (LHeC) at the LHC

Compressor Ring. Contents Where do we go? Beam physics limitations Possible Compressor ring choices Conclusions. Valeri Lebedev.

Diagnostics Needs for Energy Recovery Linacs

Accelerating Applications of RF Superconductivity. - Success Stories. Hasan Padamsee, Cornell University

Frequency and time domain analysis of trapped modes in the CERN Proton Synchrotron

LHC Luminosity and Energy Upgrade

Modern Accelerators for High Energy Physics

Overview of HEMC Scheme

TESLA: a new Tool for Science

Accelerators. Lecture V. Oliver Brüning. school/lecture5

Linac Ring Colliders

Optics considerations for

RF LINACS. Alessandra Lombardi BE/ ABP CERN

Overview of Energy Recovery Linacs

Accelerator Physics, BAU, First Semester, (Saed Dababneh).

Particle physics experiments

OVERVIEW OF THE LHEC DESIGN STUDY AT CERN

Abstract. 1. Introduction

Electron Cloud Studies for KEKB and ATF KEK, May 17 May 30, 2003

CEPC Linac Injector. HEP Jan, Cai Meng, Guoxi Pei, Jingru Zhang, Xiaoping Li, Dou Wang, Shilun Pei, Jie Gao, Yunlong Chi

Research with Synchrotron Radiation. Part I

Current and Future Developments in Accelerator Facilities. Jordan Nash, Imperial College London

Traveling Wave Undulators for FELs and Synchrotron Radiation Sources

Studies of trapped modes in the new extraction septum of the CERN Proton Synchrotron

General Considerations

Introduction to particle accelerators

Marcos Dracos IPHC-IN2P3/CNRS Strasbourg. 2 December 2008 M. Dracos, BENE 1

SLAC Summer School on Electron and Photon Beams. Tor Raubenheimer Lecture #2: Inverse Compton and FEL s

Building block. sources: paracle species + intensity (charge) acceleraaon process: energy & intensity

Low energy electron storage ring with tunable compaction factor

Potential use of erhic s ERL for FELs and light sources ERL: Main-stream GeV e - Up-gradable to 20 + GeV e -

The Gamma Factory proposal for CERN

Impedance/Reactance Problems

6 Bunch Compressor and Transfer to Main Linac

Design of a Double Spoke Cavity for C-ADS

4 FEL Physics. Technical Synopsis

Lattice Design and Performance for PEP-X Light Source

Introduction to Particle Accelerators & CESR-C

Coherent Synchrotron Radiation and Short Bunches in Electron Storage Rings. G. Wüstefeld, BESSY, Berlin (Germany)

Transverse dynamics Selected topics. Erik Adli, University of Oslo, August 2016, v2.21

Accelerators. There are some accelerators around the world Nearly all are for industrial (20 000) or clinical use (10 000)

On the future plan of KEK for ILC(International Linear Collider) Junji Urakawa(KEK) Contents

ERL FACILITY AT CERN FOR APPLICATIONS

Why are particle accelerators so inefficient?

Novel, Hybrid RF Injector as a High-average. Dinh Nguyen. Lloyd Young

LIS section meeting. PS2 design status. Y. Papaphilippou. April 30 th, 2007

SPARCLAB. Source For Plasma Accelerators and Radiation Compton. On behalf of SPARCLAB collaboration

Proposal to convert TLS Booster for hadron accelerator

Energy Recovery Linac (ERL) Properties. Physics Dept. & Cornell High Energy Synchrotron Source (CHESS) Ithaca, NY Cornell University

CERN & the High Energy Frontier

PHYS 3446 Lecture #15

Design of an RF Photo-Gun (PHIN)

Swapan Chattopadhyay Associate Director, Jefferson Lab

e + e Factories M. Sullivan Presented at the Particle Accelerator Conference June 25-29, 2007 in Albuquerque, New Mexico e+e- Factories

S2E (Start-to-End) Simulations for PAL-FEL. Eun-San Kim

Engines of Discovery

arxiv: v1 [hep-ex] 24 Nov 2015

An Introduction to Particle Accelerators. v short

USPAS Course on Recirculating Linear Accelerators

ThomX Machine Advisory Committee. (LAL Orsay, March ) Ring Beam Dynamics

Particle Accelerators. The Electrostatic Accelerators

Introduction to Elementary Particle Physics I

Run2 Problem List (Bold-faced items are those the BP Department can work on) October 4, 2002

Higgs Factory Magnet Protection and Machine-Detector Interface

CLIC THE COMPACT LINEAR COLLIDER

Transcription:

Superconducting RF Accelerators: Why all the interest? William A. Barletta Director, United States Particle Accelerator School Dept. of Physics, MIT

The HEP prespective ILC PROJECT X

Why do we need RF structures & fields?

Possible DC accelerator? C B + V -

Maxwell forbids this! B C E = db dt or in integral form E ds = C t B n da S There is no acceleration without time-varying magnetic flux + V -

Will this work? B RF-cavity

We can vary B in an RF cavity B Note that inside the cavity db/dt 0 RF-cavity However, Synchronism condition: rev = N/f rf

We can arrange rf-cavities in many ways Microtron Synchrotron Linac

RF cavities: Basic concepts Fields and voltages are complex quantities V = Ve i t + o At t = 0 particle receives maximum voltage gain Z o is the reference plane

Basic principles: Reciprocity & superposition If you can kick the beam, the beam can kick you ==> Total cavity voltage = V generator + V beam-induced Fields in cavity = E generator + E beam-induced

Basic principles: Energy conservation Total energy in the particles and the cavity is conserved Beam loading U i U f W c W c = U i - U f

Basic components of an RF cavity Outer region: Large, single turn Inductor B I Central region: Large plate Capacitor Power feed from rf - generator E d Wall current Displacement current Beam (Load) current R a

Lumped circuit analogy of resonant cavity I(t) R Z( ) = [ j C + ( j L + R) 1 ] 1 V(t) C L Z( ) ~ 1+ 2 2 + ( RC) 2 o 1 The resonant frequency is o = 1 LC Width to reduce Z by e 2 0 = R LC = 1 Q

Figure of Merit: Accelerating voltage The voltage varies during the time that bunch takes to cross the gap reduction of the peak voltage by = sin ( 2 ) 2 where = d c E pk d V t For maximum acceleration T rf 2 ==> = 2/

Figure of merit from circuits - Q Q = o o Energy stored Time average power loss = 2 o Energy stored Energy lost per cycle E = μ o 2 v P = R surf 2 H s 2 1 dv = 2 L I * oi o H 2 1 ds = 2 I oi * o R surf R surf = 1 Conductivity o Skin depth ~ 1/2 Q = L C R surf = o 1

What makes SC RF attractive?

Recall the circuit analog I(t) V(t) C R surf L As R surf ==> 0, the Q ==> In practice, Q nc ~ 10 4 Q sc ~ 10 11

Figure of merit for accelerating cavity: power to produce the accelerating field Resistive input (shunt) impedance at relates power dissipated in walls to accelerating voltage R in = V 2 (t) P = V o 2 2P = Q L C Linac literature more commonly defines shunt impedance without the 2 R in = V o 2 P ~ 1 R surf For SC-rf P is reduced by orders of magnitude BUT, it is deposited @ 2K

Translate circuit model back to directly driven, re-entrant RF cavity model Outer region: Large, single turn Inductor L = μ o a 2 2 (R + a) I B Expanding outer region raises Q Central region: Large plate Capacitor C = o R 2 o = 1 d LC 2((R + a)d = c R 2 a 2 1 2 E d Wall current Displacement current R Beam (Load) current Narrowing gap raises shunt impedance Q set by resistance in outer region Q = L C R surface = L R surface a

In an ideal pillbox, is independent of L L R E z Relative intensity C E z B L T 010 B r/r E z (r) = E o J o c r ==> = 2.405 c R

Simple consequences of pillbox model L Increasing R lowers frequency ==> Stored Energy, E ~ -2 R E ~ E z 2 E z Beam loading lowers E z for the next bunch B Lowering lowers the fractional beam loading Raising lowers Q ~ -1/2 If time between beam pulses, T s ~ Q/ almost all E is lost in the walls

The beam tube makes the field modes (& cell design) more complicated Peak E no longer on axis E pk ~ 2-3 x E acc FOM = E pk /E acc a E z o sensitive to cavity length Mechanical tuning & detuning B Beam tubes add length & $ s w/o acceleration Beam induced voltages ~ a -3 Instabilities

Comparison of SC and NC RF Superconducting RF High gradient ==> 1 GHz, meticulous care Mid-frequencies ==> Large stored energy, E s Normal Conductivity RF High gradient ==> high frequency (5-17 GHz) High frequency ==> low stored energy Large E s ==> very small E/E Large Q ==> high efficiency Low E s ==> ~10x larger E/E Low Q ==> reduced efficiency

Linacs can be considered as a series of distorted pillbox cavities Rf-power in a In warm linacs nose cones optimize the voltage per cell with respect to resistive dissipation Q = L C R surface

Linacs cells are linked to minimize cost ==> coupled oscillators ==>multiple modes Zero mode mode

Modes of a two-cell cavity

9-cavity TESLA cell

Enter Superconductivity 1911

Electrons in Solids - naïve picture

Energy distribution of electrons in normal conductors E Fermi level T = 0 T > 0

Electron-Phonon interaction ==> electron pairs - BCS theory An e - moving thru a conductor attracts nearby ions. The lattice deformation causes another e -, with opposite "spin", to move into region of higher + charge density. The two e - are held together with a binding energy, 2

In superconductors interaction of electrons with lattice phonons ==> pairs (bosons) Possibility of Bose condensate at T critical Two fluid model: E Energy gap - For T c >T > 0, excitation of unpaired electrons where 2 is the energy to break apart the Cooper pairs, until no electrons are paired above T c T = 0

DC conductivity in superconductors DC resistance = 0 because unpaired electrons are shorted out by Cooper pairs. dc

RF Resistance in Superconductors RF resistance is finite because Cooper pairs have inertia unpaied electrons see an electric field. Exponential drop Compare with Cu: R s ~ 10 m 1.5 GHz Residual resistance More resistance the more the sc pairs are jiggled around More resistance the more unpaired electrons are excited

Q In practice several effects limit the most important measure of cell performance 10 11 Residual losses Ideal 10 10 Quench 10 9 Multipacting Thermal breakdown 10 8 Oxide interface Field emission Grain boundaries 0 25 50 MV/m Accelerating Field

Multipacting Solution First spherical, later elliptical shape cells. 350-MHz LEP-II cavity (CERN) Electrons drift to equator Electric field at equator is 0 MP electrons don t gain energy MP stops

Thermometry at a quench point

Why do we need beams? Collide beams FOMs: Collision rate, energy stability, Accelerating field Examples: LHC, ILC, RHIC

In LHC storage rings Limited space & Large rf trapping of particles V/cavity must be high Bunch length must be large ( 1 event/cm in luminous region) RF frequency must be low Energy lost in walls must be small R surf must be small SC cavities were the only practical choice

For ILC SC rf provides high power, high quality beams at high efficiency ~13 km ~4.5 km ~13 km To deliver required luminosity (500 fb -1 in 4 years) ==> powerful polarized electron & positron beams (11 MW /beam) tiny beams at collision point ==> minimizing beam-structure interaction To limit power consumption ==> high wall plug to beam power efficiency Even with SC rf, the site power is still 230 MW!

Why do we need beams? Intense secondary beams FOM: Secondaries/primary Examples: spallation neutrons, neutrino beams 1 MW target at SNS

The Spallation Neutron Source 1 MW @ 1GeV (compare with ILC 11 MW at 500 GeV (upgradeable to 4 MW) ==> miniscule beam loss into accelerator ==> large aperture in cavities ==> large cavities ==> low frequency ==> high energy stability ==>large stored energy ==> high efficiency at E z ==> SC RF SNS

Proton Intensity Frontier Option: Project X Initially NOvA Possibly DUSEL later 200 kw at 8 GeV >2 MW at 120 GeV Recycler 3 linac pulses / fill Main Injector 1.4 sec cycle Stripping Foil ILC-style 8 GeV H - Linac 9mA x 1 msec x 5 Hz

Matter to energy: Synchrotron radiation science Synchrotron light source (pulsed incoherent X-ray emission) FELs FOM: Brilliance v. B = ph/s/mm 2 /mrad 2 /0.1%BW Pulse duration Science with X-rays Imaging Spectroscopy ERLs 3 rd Generation Sources

Matter to energy: Energy Recovery Linacs Hard X-rays ==> ~5 GeV Synchrotron light source (pulsed incoherent X-ray emission) Pulse rates khz => MHz X-ray pulse duration 1 ps High average e-beam brilliance & e-beam duration 1 ps One pass through ring Recover beam energy High efficiency SC RF

Even higher brightness requires coherent emission ==> FEL Free electron laser FOM: Brightness v. Time structure

Full range of FEL-based science requires Pulses rates 10 Hz to 10 MHz (NC limited to ~ 100 Hz) High efficiency Pulse duration 10 fs - 1 ps High gain Excellent beam emittance ==> Minimize wakefield effect ==> large aperture ==> low frequency Stable beam energy & intensity ==> large stored energy in cavities ==> high Q ===> SC RF

8 GeV Superconducting Linac With X-Ray FEL, 8 GeV & Spallation Sources, ILC & -factory Hegemony in accelerator-based physics