SOLAR WIND PROTON DENSITY INCREASE AND GEOMAGNETIC BACKGROUND ANOMALIES BEFORE STRONG M6+ EARTHQUAKES. V. Straser*, G. Cataldi

Similar documents
Chapter 8 Geospace 1

Geomagnetic Disturbance Report Reeve Observatory

EFFECT OF SOLAR AND INTERPLANETARY DISTURBANCES ON SPACE WEATHER

Solar-terrestrial relation and space weather. Mateja Dumbović Hvar Observatory, University of Zagreb Croatia

Sun Earth Connection Missions

THE SOLAR WIND & SOLAR VARIABILITY

Space Weather Awareness in the Arctic. Torsten Neubert Head of Section for Solar System Physics

Effect of Solar Flare X-Rays on digisonde fmin values. S. C. Tripathi H. Haralambous

Signatures of Geomagnetic Storms and Coronal Mass Ejections on Electron and Ion Temperatures At Low Latitude Upper Ionosphere

Geomagnetic storms. Measurement and forecasting

Magnetic field nomenclature

Geomagnetic Disturbance Report Reeve Observatory

CHAPTER 2 DATA. 2.1 Data Used

Radio Observations and Space Weather Research

Forecasting Earthquakes and Space Weather

Myagkova I.N., Panasyuk M.I., Kalegaev V.V. Skobeltsyn Institute of Nuclear Physics, Moscow State University, Moscow

Space Weather Effects of Coronal Mass Ejection

Space Physics: Recent Advances and Near-term Challenge. Chi Wang. National Space Science Center, CAS

Effect of CME Events of Geomagnetic Field at Indian Station Alibag and Pondicherry

How is Earth s Radiation Belt Variability Controlled by Solar Wind Changes

Substorms at Mercury: Old Questions and New Insights. Daniel N. Baker Laboratory for Atmospheric and Space Physics (LASP)

Space Weather and Satellite System Interaction

Statistical Study of the Ionospheric Density Variation Related to the 2010 Chile Earthquake and Measured by the DEMETER Satellite

An Introduction to Space Weather. J. Burkepile High Altitude Observatory / NCAR

This project has received funding from the European Union s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie-Sklodowska-Curie grant

Tracking Solar Eruptions to Their Impact on Earth Carl Luetzelschwab K9LA September 2016 Bonus

2-1-4 Preceding Monitoring of Solar Wind Toward the Earth Using STEREO

Relativistic Solar Electrons - where and how are they formed?

Why Study Magnetic Reconnection?

Using the CME-index for short-term estimation of Ap geomagnetic index

Solar Activity during the Rising Phase of Solar Cycle 24

Geomagnetic Sudden Impulses

Variation of Solar Wind Parameters During Intense Geomagnetic Storms

Remote sensing of magnetospheric processes: Lesson 1: Configura7on of the magnetosphere

A NEW MODEL FOR REALISTIC 3-D SIMULATIONS OF SOLAR ENERGETIC PARTICLE EVENTS

Simulation of the charging process of the LISA test masses due to solar particles.

STCE Newsletter. 7 Dec Dec 2015

High energy particles from the Sun. Arto Sandroos Sun-Earth connections

10:10-10 :35 P.K.Manoharan National Centre for Radio Astrophysics

The Sun. Never look directly at the Sun, especially NOT through an unfiltered telescope!!

STCE Newsletter. 29 Jan Feb 2018

Cluster and DEMETER Satellite Data. Fabien Darrouzet (Belgian Institute for Space Aeronomy (IASB-BIRA))

Summer School Lab Activities

On the possibility to forecast severe radiation storms by data from surface and space-born facilities

1.3j describe how astronomers observe the Sun at different wavelengths

Geomagnetic Disturbances (GMDs) History and Prediction

NICT SPACE WEATHER ACTIVITIES

STCE Newsletter. 4 Jan Jan 2016

Space Weather. ~ Affects of solar activities onto Earth. Cause-Effect Time Intervals range from immediate (precisely, 8 minutes) to several days.

Sun-Earth Connection Missions

Solar Flare Variations

Possible stereoscopic Hard X-ray observations with STIX and SORENTO instruments

Research Update on Solar Polar Fields/Coronal Hole IMF and Large Earthquakes, and a Proposed Method for Quantifying Coronal Hole Geo effectiveness

STCE Newsletter. 11 Jan Jan 2016

Science. Earth Science. New Jersey Quality Single Accountability Continuum (NJQSAC) Department: Course Title. Textbook(s): Focus on Earth Science

Comparative study of solar and geomagnetic indices for the solar cycle 22 and 23 C. M Tiwari Dept. of Physics, APS University, Rewa (M. P.

Solar Sector Structure: Fact or Fiction?

Space weather. Introduction to lectures by Dr John S. Reid. Image courtesy:

michele piana dipartimento di matematica, universita di genova cnr spin, genova

Rationale for a European Space Weather Programme

This page intentionally left blank!

The Solar Wind Space physics 7,5hp

Solar eruptive phenomena

STCE Newsletter. 18 Jan Jan 2016


SPACE WEATHER: STORMS FROM THE SUN

The Sun sends the Earth:


Space Weather. S. Abe and A. Ikeda [1] ICSWSE [2] KNCT

Possible Correlation between Solar Activity and Global Seismicity

Space Physics. An Introduction to Plasmas and Particles in the Heliosphere and Magnetospheres. May-Britt Kallenrode. Springer

Solar Energetic Particles measured by AMS-02

The Magnetic Sun. CESAR s Booklet

Interplanetary Field During the Current Solar Minimum

rising phase of solar cycle 24 based on

Study of Solar Proton Event Observed using Riometers

MONITORING OF COSMIC RAYS IN REAL TIME AND INFORMATION SYSTEM OF THE MOSCOW COSMIC RAY STATION

DEUTSCHE WELLE SOLAR GEOPHYSICAL ACTIVITY REPORT FEBRUARY 2007

19:00-20:30 Welcome Reception at the Wäinö Aaltonen Museum of Art. 09:40-10:10 An Historical Perspective on Coronal Mass Ejections: 5$

Radio Emission from the Sun Observed by LOFAR and SKA

BIRA-IASB, 30th October 2006

Solar Flare Durations

RELATIVISTIC ELECTRONS AND ULF-ACTIVITY DYNAMICS DURING CIR- AND CME-STORMS IN MAY 2005

PC index as a standard of magnetospheric disturbances in the auroral zone

Radio Probes of Extrasolar Space Weather

Relationship between Interplanetary (IP) Parameters and Geomagnetic Indices during IP Shock Events of 2005

How did the solar wind structure change around the solar maximum? From interplanetary scintillation observation

Atmospheric Structure

STCE Newsletter. 6 Jan Jan 2014

Solar and Interplanetary Disturbances causing Moderate Geomagnetic Storms

Introduction to the Sun and the Sun-Earth System

INTERPLANETARY ASPECTS OF SPACE WEATHER

If the Sun is so quiet, why is the Earth still ringing?

Inverse Correlations between Daily Average Energy of Global 0.01 to 1 M Earthquakes and Solar Flux Units: Possible Source of Coupling

The Solar wind - magnetosphere - ionosphere interaction

Time Series of Images of the Auroral Substorm

Plasma and Magnetic Field Observations of Stream Interaction Regions near 1 AU

Solar Transients P.K. Manoharan

Physics 343 Lecture # 5: Sun, Stars, and Planets; Bayesian analysis

Report from Finland. Kirsti Kauristie Finnish Meteorological Institute

Transcription:

SOLAR WIND PROTON DENSITY INCREASE AND GEOMAGNETIC BACKGROUND ANOMALIES BEFORE STRONG M6+ EARTHQUAKES V. Straser*, G. Cataldi *International Earthquake and Volcano Prediction Center E-mail: valentino.straser@alice.it Abstract. This research analyses the relationships between ion density variations in the solar wind, recorded by the ACE satellite, and variations in the geomagnetic and interplanetary magnetic fields, as measured by the GOES 13 and 15 satellites before earthquakes with a magnitude of M6+. From the data presented, from January 1, 2012 to 31 December 2013, correlations can be established between solar activity, seismic events, and the geomagnetic background linked to the plasmasphere. 1. Instruments used The geomagnetic field is detected by analogue radio receivers ultra-low-noise high-speed precision operational-amplifiers in the SELF bands ( <3 Hz), ELF (3-30 Hz), SLF (30-300 Hz), ULF (300-3000 Hz), VLF (3-30 khz) and LF (30-300 khz), using coil antennas and antennas sensitive to magnetic fields. The SELF/ELF radio receiver equipped with a coil antenna vertically aligned parallel to the Z- component of the geomagnetic field is formed by three multilayer coils wound around a ferromagnetic core and connected in series (magnetic induction antenna) for a total of 468.4k windings. The total theoretical inductance reaches 1.18MH. Digital-to-Analogue Conversion (DAC) of the signals is performed at 24-bit with a Sample Rate of 192kHz and a resolution varying between 0.5 and 3Mhz. 2. Area of Experiment and Preliminary Data Analysis The data used (from January 1, 2012 to 31 December, 2013) concern the change in solar wind ion density detected by the ACE satellite in orbit near L1 Lagrange, 1.5 million km from Earth; the Solar 280

Wind Density (ENLIL Heliosphere Ecliptic Plane); variations in the Interplanetary Magnetic Field or IMF (GOES) and the flow of X-rays (GOES). The induction magnetometer of the Radio Emissions Project station is located at Albano Laziale, Rome, Italy, Lat: 41 41'4,27"N, Long: 12 38 '33.60 "E, and reads the intensity and frequency of the Earth's magnetic field every 60 seconds. The data series was labelled with time markers of M6+ seismic events that took place on a global scale (provided in real time by the USGS, INGV and CSEM), which confirmed the existence of perturbations in the interplanetary medium (solar wind) and in the Earth's geomagnetic field in the interval of time preceding the M6+ seismic events [1]. The results of the study showed that the M6+ seismic events that occurred between 2012 and 2013 were all preceded by an increase (of a "gradual" type) in solar wind proton density, plus an increase in the Z component of the earth's magnetic field (Fig 1). Figure 1. The time interval (in minutes) that elapses between the start of a (gradual) solar wind proton density increase and the earthquakes recorded in 2012-2014. 281

3. Seismic Geomagnetic Precursors (SGP) and earthquakes Seismic Geomagnetic Precursors or SGP are variations in the Earth's geomagnetic field, (geomagnetic anomalies), associated with a change in solar activity, which precede strong M6+ earthquakes [2,3]. As shown by the data from monitoring the SELF-ELF band, the spectrographic characteristics of these radio emissions are identifiable as typical of a geomagnetic disturbance that occurs due to an increase in solar activity, and show up as general increases in the Earth's geomagnetic field at a frequency ranging from <3Hz to ~10-15Hz, with an intensity directly proportional to their wavelength. The same anomalies, if observed through a fluxgate magnetometer, reveal intense geomagnetic field variations produced by the increase in solar activity. By analysing data on global M6+ seismic activity, and data from electromagnetic monitoring of the SELF/ELF band between January 1, 2012 and December 31, 2012, it has emerged that all M6+ earthquakes that took place on a global scale were preceded by an increase in the natural electromagnetic background between <3Hz and ~10-15Hz. Taking as a reference the maximum intensity (Fig. 2) recorded for an electromagnetic anomaly (SGP), it was possible to calculate the time lag between this and the M6+ earthquake. The average time lag was ~598 minutes (~9 hours). The minimum time lag recorded was 1 minute (M6.4 Balleny Islands, October 9, 2012); the maximum time lag recorded was 2,241 minutes (M6.0, Kuril Islands, September 9, 2012). The distribution of the time intervals tends to decrease in relation to the increase in earthquake magnitude. 282

Figure 2. Solar wind ion density related to global M6+ seismic activity. S (the beginning of the increase), Ti (the time between the proton increase and the associated earthquake). 4. Variation in proton density and earthquakes Analysis of ionic variation in the solar wind (interplanetary medium) has confirmed that all M6+ earthquakes that occurred on a global scale between 2012 and 2013 happened after a "gradual" change in proton density with energy divided into 5 groups: 1060-1900 kev, 795-1193 kev, 310-580 kev, 115-195 kev, 47-68 kev. In some cases, an increase in proton density was overlapped by an increase in electron density with energy divided into 2 groups: 175-315 kev e 38-53 kev. The increases occurred as the result of a solar flare or the presence of a coronal hole. The ion increase recorded by the ACE Satellite near the L1 Lagrange Point was observed using data provided by the Solar and Heliospheric Observatory (SOHO) and the WSA (Wang-Sheeley - Arge) ENLIL Heliosphere Nowcast (CCMC, University of Colorado). The data measuring the ion density were converted into "Dyinamic Plots" and published on the website of the National Oceanic and 283

Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)/SWPC (Space Weather Prediction Center). The average time lag between the increase in solar activity and the 360 M6+ earthquakes was 9,958.4 minutes (quantifiable as 165.9 hours or 6.9 days). The maximum time lag was recorded before the M7.0 earthquake that struck Indonesia on April 6, 2013. The minimum time lag was recorded before the M6.0 earthquake in the Mariana Islands on November 19, 2013. 5. Implications of the theory and experimental comparisons The variation in the Earth's geomagnetic activity was primarily modulated by the variation in ion density (protons and electrons) present in the interplanetary medium that interacts with the Earth's magnetosphere, and the amount of X-rays that, starting from the solar corona, reach the earth's ionosphere [4]. All the earthquakes analysed (Fig. 3) were preceded, albeit with variable timing, by an increase in proton density. While, in general, it was noted that an ion increase can even precede more than one M6+ seismic event, for example, in the case of the recent earthquakes that occurred in July 2014, which struck 7 days after a major increase in solar activity. The perturbation arriving from the Sun was intercepted by the ACE satellite, and a few minutes later also by GOES 13 and 15. After the latter, from measurements of the variation in the geomagnetic field, several hours may pass. The temporary interruption of the flow may be interpreted as the time necessary to "inject" the high-energy particles into the plasma sphere. The time interval between the values given by GOES 13 and 15 and the associated earthquake, is instead recurring, and varies according to multiples of 8 minutes, a time interval that agrees with the study by Dr. David Sibek; the two fields merge or "reconnect" briefly, forming a portal through which the particles flow [5,6]. Overall, 94% of the M6+ earthquakes studied occurred after the onset of a radio anomalies, an increase in the geomagnetic background, and subsequent normalisation; the remaining 6% during the increase itself. In particular: 29% of the M6+ earthquakes occurred within 1 284

hour of the normalization of the geomagnetic background; 16% within 61-120 minutes, 12% within 121-240, 28% within 241-480 further minutes, 15% of the earthquakes after more than 8 hours. Figure 3. Spectrographic characteristics of the Seismic Geomagnetic Precursors (SGPs) and time intervals associated with the M6+ seism that occurred in 2012. 6. Results of the correlational study Analysis of the data on solar activity, geomagnetic activity and global M6+ seismic activity has confirmed that between January 1, 2012 and 31 December, 2013 global seismic activity has always been preceded, in comparable intervals, by a rise in proton density of the interplanetary medium recorded by the ACE (Advanced Composition Explorer) Satellite, in orbit around the L1 Lagrange point, at 1.5 million km from Earth, from an increase in the geomagnetic background and geomagnetic anomalies, detected 24/7 by the Radio Emissions Project monitoring station (Albano Laziale, Rome, Italy). For application, the method lends itself as a candidate to analyse M6+ seismic precursors on a global scale, and to check a link and 285

synchronicity of an electromagnetic type between the Sun and the Earth. References 1. G.Cataldi, D.Cataldi, V.Straser, Earth s magnetic field anomalies that precede the M6+ global seismic activity. Geophysical Research Abstract, Vol 16, EGU2014-1068, 2014, EGU General Assembly 2014. 2. G. Cataldi, D. Cataldi, V. Straser, Variations Of Terrestrial Geomagnetic Activity Correlated To M6+ Global Seismic Activity Geophysical Research Abstracts, Vol. 15, EGU (European Geosciences Union) General Assembly 2013. 3. J.Y.Liu, Y.I.Chen, S.A.Pulinets, Y.B.Tsai, Y.J.Chuo. Seismo- ionospheric signatures prior to M 6.0 Taiwan earthquakes. Geophysical Research Letters, 2000, v. 27, Issue 19, p. 3113-3116. 4. Khazaradze, N.G., Metskhvarishvili, R. Ya., Elizbarashvili, M.A., Mininoshvili, Z.N., Metskhvarishvili, I.R., Nekrasova, V., Metskhvarishvili, M.R., and Khorbalazde, L.R.,. Anomalous solardiurnal variations in cosmic rays related to crossing of the IMF sector boundaries by the Earth and the problem of earthquake. Geomagnetism and Aeronomy, 2007, v. 47, no.3, p. 395-398. 5. V.Straser, Can IMF And The Electromagnetic Coupling Between The Sun And The Earth Cause Potentially Destructive Earthquakes?, New Concepts in Global Tectonics Newsletter, 2012, no. 65, p. 27-34. 6. Phillips, T., 2008. Magnetic Portals Connect Earth to the Sun. http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2008/30oct_ftes.htm 286